EASTPORT, Maine — There’s a new tidal energy project in town, or at least a new version of an old project that dates from the era of Franklin Delano Roosevelt.

As something of a geographic anomaly, the Bay of Fundy, which separates Down East Maine from Nova Scotia and New Brunswick, generates the highest vertical tides in the world. Hydrology studies have shown there are tidal variations of more than 50 feet in some places and at some times of the year. In a single 12-hour tide cycle, 115 billion tons of seawater flow in and out of the bay, which is more than the combined flow of all the freshwater rivers in the world.

That’s a lot of energy, a reality that wasn’t lost on FDR, whose family’s summer compound on New Brunswick’s Campobello Island fronted Passamaquoddy Bay, which has a twice-a-day tidal flow of 70 billion cubic feet and tidal variations of as much as 20 feet. As a candidate for vice president in 1920, Roosevelt first proposed a massive public works project that would harness that tidal energy to produce electricity. Later, as president, he was able to secure $7 million in federal funding for a project estimated to cost $36 million.

Known locally as the “Quoddy Dam Project,” it was less than half-completed before being abandoned in 1936 for reasons grounded in a lack of investors and the objections of the era’s existing electrical utilities, which feared the project would generate electricity at rates lower than their own.

Despite that Depression-era false start, the potential for converting tidal energy into electricity persists, as do efforts to harness it. For eight years, Portland-based Ocean Renewable Power Co. has been working out of Eastport and Cobscook Bay while conceptualizing, fabricating, testing and refining what has evolved into a 90,000-pound, 98-foot turbine. It was submerged in Cobscook Bay in August at a depth of 82 feet for a year of testing that is being underwritten by the U.S. Department of Energy as part of a $10 million grant.

Should a year of field testing ORPC’s first TidGen unit prove the turbine to be technologically viable and environmentally benign, four identical turbines are expected to be phased into use over the next few years. Collectively, they are expected to harness the force of the region’s iconic tides to generate as much as 4 megawatts of power, enough electricity to power 1,000 homes.

Now, in the shadows of that project, is a tidal energy concept first proposed to the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission in 2009 by Tidewalker Associates, an entity created in 2005 by Normand Laberge of Trescott. He envisions constructing a 1,200-foot barrage, or small dam, that would capture and use as a powerhouse energy source the tide that flows into and out of Half Moon Cove, which separates Eastport from Perry and the Pleasant Point Passamaquoddy Indian Reservation.

The 950-acre surface area of the cove was created when the existing Route 190 causeway that links the reservation to Eastport was built as part of the infrastructure for FDR’s tidal power project. The barrage that Laberge is proposing would extend across the Bar Harbor passage into the cove from the terminus of Toll Bridge Road in Eastport to the terminus of Old Eastport Road in Perry.

The Half Moon Cove Tidal Barrage project would be situated at the same latitude as the Annapolis Royal Generating Station in Nova Scotia. For more than 20 years, its 18-megawatt powerhouse has used the tidal waters that flow into and out of the Annapolis River as a no-cost fuel source.

“The Half Moon Cove project isn’t on a river and wouldn’t create a reservoir,” Laberge said Thursday. “It doesn’t change the environment, and it can be engineered so it doesn’t affect the intertidal zone, so clamming wouldn’t be affected. Scallops could still be harvested by divers or by small draggers.”

There is no shortage of regulatory hoops and environmental impact studies between Laberge’s concept and federal and state approval. If the project as envisioned were to be built today, Laberge estimates it would cost as much as $50 million and have a generating capacity of 9 megawatts, more than twice the output of ORPC’s initial generating project. Where that money would come from remains an unknown, he said.

Laberge recently filed with FERC a pre-application document that outlines the specifics of the proposed tidal dam project, as well as a notice of intent to seek a license to pursue the project. That document is being circulated among stakeholders, who Laberge said include fishermen who work the cove, owners of properties that front Half Moon Cove, and the communities of Eastport, Perry and Pleasant Point. The Passamaquoddy Tribe owns the most property on the cove, said Laberge, who now works as the tribe’s energy director.

“Eventually the tribe will decide by referendum if it wants to invest in the project,” Laberge said Thursday. “I went to the tribe in 2006 to see if they wanted to get involved, but at that point they were focused on an LNG [liquified natural gas] terminal and left it at ‘keep us informed.’ At this point the tribe’s energy efforts are directed toward wind.”

Between now and year’s end, Laberge will be fielding public comment on the project from both government entities and other interested parties. His timeline calls for a public scoping session in mid-November, which may include a site visit. Environmental and cultural resources impact studies would take place between March and December 2013. A draft license application would be prepared, circulated and discussed in 2014 before a final application is submitted to FERC in 2014.

Laberge is scheduled to meet Monday with Bob Peacock, the chairman of the Eastport City Council, to discuss the proposed project. Peacock’s shorefront home on Toll Bridge Road is adjacent to the proposed barrage.

“I have a lot of questions,” Peacock said Friday. “I need to better understand what would be the benefits to the community.”

Join the Conversation

24 Comments

  1. Well like wind and solar it’s all about the cost and generation efficiency of the design. 

    Good luck getting anything put in the water off the Maine coasts without the NIMBY and ecomentalists having a field day.

    1.  I agree with the difficulty, perhaps they ought to strap King Angus to the plow. He has been mightily successful destroying our mountains with a wonderfully subsidized tax incentive, to boot, which, I presume, you are happily paying.

  2. Personally I think it is a great source of cheap energy that just keeps giving day after day forever. If the hurdles can be jumped over then build away. In reallity if approved in ten years it will coast 2-3x as much and no longer feasible at those prices. just think if this had been built fully back in 1936 the energy it would have been harvesting just like the Hoover dam.

  3. For the people’s sake.don’t support anything that is good for the area,(pun intended). I do wonder where the power is distributed and how it supports the local area?

    I understand all power supplied into the grid may increase the power sent out of state. Is this true? Wbo knows for sure.

  4. Big Power grew up to become Big Oil and it is no surprise, and not even hidden in the background back then, that they would have none of alternative resources at the detriment of their coffers. They continue this fight to this day but there is a more informed and determined citizenry that is posing a concentrated pushback. And there is one administration that has worked to promote and incorporate alternative energy projects into the forefront. It is one of the main reasons I am voting to continue the  advocacy of this administration. 

        1. I didn’t call it junk science, ptrb did.  Just wanted to know his judgement criteria for calling it junk.

      1. Republicans/Teahadists/WrongPaulers worship Ignorance.

        One more example of the Nation’s decline in STEM.

        Yessah

  5. Fellows, ladies, and all connected to the coast of Maine, one must remember, the coast has been conquered, the packing plants are all closed. This majestic coast of Maine is for one thing, and, that is for the rich to sail their boats up and keep them clean. Clammers and lobstermen are allowed, tolerated, cause, the flattys like to treat their important visitors to their sea preserve, some sea food. How dare anyone propose a use that might blight the landscape, how shallow of mind fellow sirs, that one might even consider to harness the natural power of the sea and moon, the tide ebbs and flows twice in twentyfour hours, for the delight only,! of the summer visitor.

  6. this Laberge cat looks a bit too much like Christopher Lloyd as Doc Brown for my liking.

    if i were the good people of  half moon cove and the surrounding environs, i would carefully check all the fine print for a plan to run a giant cable to a clock in the town center.

  7. As long as the electric generator portion is above water and not submerged by it, like the stupid ORPC design; it will probably survive the test of time. 

    The ORPC design is flawed from the get-go, the best of seals, including the ones that swim; eventually fail.

    Of course we all know that the local politicians have to be swayed to get on board with this project. Since they already backed one to the hilt and gave away the boat school property in the process, a second project is going to be a very hard sell. 

    The president of the city council is a NIMBY instantly, anything he says opposing this project should be totally ignored.

  8. The whole tidal power deal happening down east is the biggest scam going since the Lubec “Gold from Sea Water” scam.  It won’t supply enough power to make any differance and the cost of it will astronomical and paid for by your taxes and electric bills.   Last I checked the flow of the tide comes to a stop several times a day as it shifts from high to low…..will the lights go out during these periods?

    1. Do you really think they’re going to rip out the existing electrical supply lines when they hook up the hydro power lines? They’re supposed to SUPPLEMENT the power, not replace it. Why do people find this concept so hard to digest? Could you be any more negative>?

  9. I’m sure we can find some guppy that is convenienced by these things and kill it outright.  Heaven knows we shouldn’t have more electricity.

  10. “The Half Moon Cove Tidal Barrage project ….. the tidal waters that flow into and out ……. as a no-cost fuel source.”
     
    I think we’ve learned from our experiences with inland or offshore grid scale wind power projects that having a “no cost fuel source” is irrelevent if the cost of the infastructure and transmission are exhorbitently expensive.  The wind is free, but the wholesale cost of power generated by inland wind is roughly 3 times more expensive than conventional sources despite the “free”  source.   Offshore wind, based on contracts for the upcoming projects on the Cape and in Rhode Island will be 6-8 times more expensive than conventional sources.  And that includes the fact that these projects are very heavily subsidized with your Federal tax dollars.   On a megawatt to megawatt comparison wind is subsidized at a rate at least 12 times than any other source – except solar.  These are facts, not hyperbole.

Leave a comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *