AUGUSTA, Maine — Maine’s attorney general Tuesday asked for a court review of the federal government’s decision not to rule on the state’s request to make about $20 million in cuts to the state’s Medicaid program as quickly as the LePage administration had asked.

Attorney General William Schneider filed documents with the 1st Circuit Court of Appeals in Boston on Tuesday asking for the court to review the federal Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services’ failure to act by Sept. 1 on Maine’s request for an amendment to its Medicaid state plan.

Schneider also asked the court to order federal officials to issue a ruling on Maine’s request to cut Medicaid and to pay Maine’s state share of related Medicaid expenses for the time they take to consider the request.

In filing the court documents, Schneider is following through on a threat he made to take legal action if Maine didn’t get its way in its efforts to trim about 36,000 people from the Medicaid rolls as a budget-balancing measure. The cuts in question are related to reductions approved as part of two supplemental budget packages passed by lawmakers this year.

“The failure of the [Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services] to take action in consideration of the State’s critical time constraints is in effect a denial of Maine’s proposed [State Plan Amendment],” Schneider said in a prepared statement. “Given the response from CMS, Maine has no choice but to present this matter to the United States Court of Appeals for the First Circuit.”

A spokesman for the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services said he couldn’t comment on pending litigation.

The court action follows a letter the federal government issued Friday to tell state officials the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services still was reviewing Maine’s request for an amendment to its Medicaid state plan and it wouldn’t make a decision by Sept. 1.

The LePage administration had requested a decision by Sept. 1 when it submitted its request for the Medicaid plan amendment on Aug. 1. In Friday’s letter to LePage, acting administrator Marilyn Tavenner noted that the Medicare and Medicaid office has 90 days to review such a request.

The state Department of Health and Human Services had been planning to implement the Medicaid cuts by Oct. 1. But if the federal government uses the full 90-day time frame it’s allowed to rule on the state’s Medicaid-trimming request, the state might not have a decision in hand until the end of October.

The state cuts would eliminate coverage for 19- and 20-year-olds, tighten income eligibility requirements for low-income parents and scale back Medicaid access for elderly residents who also qualify for Medicare benefits.

State Health and Human Services Commissioner Mary Mayhew said her department will move ahead with preparations to implement the Medicaid cuts, pending approval from the federal government or the outcome of the state’s court action.

“I am disappointed to receive the letter from the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services stating that they will not act on our request for an expedited approval of our State Plan Amendment within 30 days, and that we are forced to take legal action to make reductions that were approved by the Maine State Legislature,” she said in a prepared statement.

Democrats opposed the Medicaid cuts that were part of a May supplemental budget package. Rep. Peggy Rotundo of Lewiston, the lead Democrat on the Legislature’s Appropriations Committee, said Tuesday it was “unconscionable” that the LePage administration was taking legal action to advocate for the cuts.

“The governor’s choosing to spend taxpayer money to go to court to take away health care from the elderly and disabled in Maine,” she said.

Whether the LePage administration is allowed to make many of the proposed Medicaid cuts has been uncertain since lawmakers approved them.

The Affordable Care Act, the Obama administration’s health care reform law, largely prohibits states from making cuts to existing Medicaid services before a 2014 expansion of Medicaid, a program funded by states and the federal government that provides health insurance to low-income residents.

While the Supreme Court in June largely upheld the federal health care reform law, the court ruled it unconstitutionally coercive for the federal government to withhold all Medicaid funds from a state that doesn’t participate in the Medicaid expansion.

The LePage administration saw that portion of the ruling as a sign it’s legal to go ahead with cuts to existing Medicaid services simply by applying to the federal government for a routine amendment to Maine’s Medicaid State Plan.

Join the Conversation

124 Comments

  1. But it’s ok if Governor Lepage holds back bond money till 2015 that the PEOPLE voted for to be released this year?

      1. If this doesn’t tell ALL the people of Maine that LePage only represents himself and SOME OF  his disciples.  Obviously some of his supporters will suffer due to his arrogance unless they sell their home at rock bottom prices and move to one of LePage’s approved cities.   This behavior is so sickening but really just “par” for his course… very selfish, narcissistic, anti-social and child-like, spiteful, arrogant… you know, sometimes there just aren’t enough words!!! Anyone who votes for him again deserves having their life dictated by him.    

        1. Well someone voted for him. He didn’t get elected by himself. Voters should take a good long look in the mirror and decide early if they wish to keep getting the BIG boot up the butt for another 4 years. Same goes for the national elections. Be very thoughtful of your right to vote and execute that right with full awareness  to where we go if the wrong party is voted in. And be wary of lies that will be spewed all over the air waves the next 2 months.

    1. Holding back the years
      Thinking of the fear I’ve had for so long
      When somebody hears
      Listen to the fear that’s gone

      Strangled by the wishes of pater
      Hoping for the arm of mater
      Get to me sooner or later

      1. I hope you don’t think people look at you as deep or insightful with your mimicking drivel do you?

         What’s next? Gonna recite something by Cindy Lauper or the Knack?

        1. Is it just destiny, destiny?

          Or is it just a game in my mind, (Billy Schneid)?

          (For those of tender years, this is an adaptation of part of the lyrics in My Sharona, a song of teenage lust, by the Knack.)

      2. Strangled by the wishes of father
        Hoping for the arm of mother
        Get to me sooner or later, alligator
        Catchy  jingle
        But i would recommend keeping your day job

    1. I see. So the Feds have the right to force the states to spend money? The Supreme Court might disagree.

      1. The Feds have been forcing States to comply and Maine has been forcing towns and cities to appropriate and spend funds(education requirements come to mind) raised through taxation all along…they’re called unfunded mandates.

  2. The LePage Administration knew that the feds normally take the full 90 days to rule on a waiver request. The LePage Administration waited until August 1 to submit the request for a waiver. Why didn’t LePage submit the request earlier? Now because the feds are not doing what LePage wants he is going to take them to court. For the past 19 months all we have heard from LePage and his tea party parrot minions is that we are broke. Is getting in a court battle with a branch of the Federal Government going to be free? I hardly think so. It would appear that this is another case of LePage thinking he can bulldoze his way through the process. Now it is going to cost Maine Taxpayers plenty for his bull headedness. This tea party insanity has to end before we are bankrupt. On November 6th we can put an end to this madness by taking away LePage’s majorities in the Maine House and Senate.

    1. They didn’t submit it earlier because they thought that SCOTUS was going to deem Obamacare unconstitutional. But then something happened on the way to victory for the AG and LePage (as well as all the other States who piled onto the lawsuit).

  3. If they had submitted their request when the budget was passed in May or even July,  they would have had their answer before Oct 1. Are they hoping a rushed review will favor them? Schneider is Lepage’s  errand boy, not a constitutional officer. I can’t wait to see him, Poliquin, and Summers out the door.

    1. We have a short bus State Government. 
      They’re so proud of being special they’ll sue for special treatment.
      Make it a Federal Case, in fact.

    2. As we approach November 6th it appears more and more likely that the only “rush” we’ll be feeling will be the back draft created by republicans getting the boot out of office. If you think they’re floundering as a political party much like an inflated balloon released untied now, just wait to watch em scatter hither and thither after we vote!

      1. Here in Maine and many other places, the TeaPublican Corporate Toadies who dance for joy every time a job is offshored, who dance for joy every time a billionaire gets another tax cut, who dance for joy every time a person dies because they can’t afford healthcare while their insurance company CEO masters buy more mansions, who dance for joy every time a poor person goes hungry while oil companies get billion dollar tax subsidies, and more, yes, these rotten corporate stooges, are going to get SMASHED TO SMITHEREENS at the voting booth in November.  No doubt about it.  Folks have had enough of their LIES and them doing everything they possibly can to steal from the 99% while further lining the pockets of themselves and their corporate masters. 

      2. I’m gonna cast an absentee ballot early so if I die between now and November, my legacy will be booting out as many Republicans as I can on my way out.

      1.  Rockalong,

        I couldn’t agree more.  The attorney General in most states is elected by the people and so it should be in Maine.

         “We the people” should make that a TOP priority.  I believe it requires a change in our constitution..a long process but we can meanwhile let this attorney general ( and hopefully we will have a new one after Nov 6.)know.that we expect them to act on behalf of we the people..and of course we have to demand that of our legislature as well.

        If the legislature were following the will of the people, then the AG automatically would be too.

        That he is not means neither our legislature nor our Governor has a finger on the pulse on the public interest

    3. Same thing with the voting issues around the country,they wait to the last minute  hoping a rushed review will favor them.Typical republican ,rules are for everyone but them

  4. Waah, I didn’t get my way and now I want to take legal action because I didn’t get my way…waah, waaaaah.
    If you think Lepage and his cast of idiots are capable of running a state I hope this article changes your mind. Let’s go waste more money because he simply did not get his way, because he simply has to actually WAIT for someone to get back to him. 
    If you thought the Democrats were people who wasted money, take a look at money Lepage is wasting.
    It doesn’t matter what the law says, as this article points out, if they don’t get their way then I will act on the threat of suing and taking this to court.
    By the time this is taken into consideration, the 90 day window will be up and the Feds will have already responded.
    I hope the Boston circuit laughs and throws this case out.

  5. Quit wasting our money on these pet projects of the TeaPotty!  Most of the voters don’t even want this.  Spend Bubba LePage’s money on it.

  6. No politics here folks, move along, nothing to see here ….nothing the voters need to know, you are too stupid anyways to realize we have our own agenda, and it is not yours.

    1. Schneider is a joke and now it’s on record. The 1st Circuit in Boston is, as a matter of law, going to tell him, and in no uncertain terms, that the Fed’s have no obligation to respond according to Maine’s demand. In fact, and it’s going to be written in their ruling, that Maine knew full well of the Fed’s 90 day window and deliberately ignored it in trying to get a ruling done for purely political, not health related, reason’s. What ever case’s Maine now has before the Federal Court’s are in serious trouble since the Federal Court’s are going to ask themselve’s, with good reason, just who is in charge of the AG’s Office and can they read their own Statute’s ? Maine just took a huge shot in the too-too and we have the Governor and the AG to thank for it. And with the AG an elected position thru the State Senate, Lil’ Billy is now going to be facing a very not-so-nice bunch of legislator’s after the clearly seen election’s that are coming. If he thought Peggy Rotundo was a problme now, wait until after the election and the AG’s Office is put under the microscope of OPEGA. It’s inevitable now and the ride from here on out just get’s nastier. 2016 is coming and in this case it’s coming faster than anyone expect’s.   

  7. Give me a break! We’re going to spend money on a lawsuit to have the court tell us HHS is acting within the rules.. Another ploy for attention by LaPage. Use that money to fund the deficit caused by his failure to balance the DHHS budget on reality not wannas!!

  8. Be careful of what you ask….you may get an answer you don’t want.  Funny how the tea baggers are so quick to use the very courts it derides for taking the country in the wrong direction.  Perhaps Washington is just thinking of a polite way to tell us to go to hel…..lo.

  9. If Lepage, Republicans, and particularly the Tea Party, were able to completely eliminate healthcare coverage for the poor, they would.

    The way they see it, people that receive any kind of assistance are a drain on resources and we’d all be better off if they could be eliminated.

    LePage is a stooge for the extreme right wing and couldn’t care less about middle class Mainers.

    The policies that the Tea Party advocates will destroy our country.

    1. “The way they see it, people that receive any kind of assistance are a drain on resources and we’d all be better off if they could be eliminated. ”

      Ah-yup, and as if that is not bad enough, what good have THEY done, yet ?

      1. I wonder if they count the pensions that are given to, say people like LePage and other government workers are considered assistance. Because it is all taxpayer monies. It basically is
        all handouts with that kind of mentality running loose in state and federal houses.

    2.  What is and what continues is what we allow

      It cannot happen without our consent.. if we do not speak up as these decisions are made we are giving our consent.

      It isn’t as simple as who we vote for on Nov 6.

      It requires that  we check in as “present’ and engaged  every day on every issue that affects our lives, our livelihoods, our futures, our children’s futures.

  10. So, we have an AG (and Governor) who can neither meet deadlines or play by the rules.  And their procrastination will cost us how much?  Can the gang who can’t shoot straight do any more damage?

    1. who can neither meet deadlines or play by the rules ….  

      Do people like that, and who will not compromise, to boot, deserve to govern, ever? 
      Remember it when you vote.

  11. heres a right to life plan lets take peoples healthcare away so they dont have healthcare and they get sick go broke and die.  yes some people do die because they dont have health insurance.

      1.  They’re too busy lighting up more death row inmates in Texas and planning to shoot the next doctor.

      1. But the stock market suggests lots of recovery.
        How can we trust Republicans who don’t want to talk about Wall St. or the last GOP GOVERNMENT’S record ?

        lol

          1. The banking problems of the ’80s and ’90s came primarily, but not exclusively, from unsound real estate lending. They started inventing creative accounting strategies that turned their businesses into Ponzi schemes that looked highly profitable, thereby attracting more investors and growing rapidly, while actually losing money. You’ve heard of Michael Milken, AKA  the Junk Bond King.  Racketeering and securities fraud, I believe that Mr. Milken was a HUGE wall street cat and guess what, he got caught. And there is the S&L fiasco you have been dreaming about in your sleep. Wall Street greed at its best. Barny Frank and the Dems, I think not.

          2. The law sponsered by Frank that changed some of the S&L into other Banking areas started the mess. I do not recall the law, but it was sponsered by Frank and the Dems and it is so.

          3. Well i’m sorry to say that I believe your wrong. The Savings and Loan banking junk bond debacle, happened way before Barney Frank became involved with legislature on Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac.    “and it is so”, would not stand up in any court as evidence.

          4. That is your right as it is my right that the laws were changed with Frank, and that was the reason for the mess.

          5. Yes sir, it is your right to have your opinion. As it certainly is my right to point out that your opinion holds no water in the truth. Doesn’t take much to disprove your opinion as a fallacy. Just a little reading is all. You should try it. Let me help you out on this. A fallacy is usually an error in reasoning often due to a misconception or a presumption.

      2. In case you forgot your history lessons, who do you think caused the “Great Depression”? Repubs or Dems?
        It not only caused the US poverty it affected the world.
        What did these parties do to fix that?
        Give up yet?
        Look up and read about  Smoot and Hawley and when your done, remember doesn’t matter if it’s Maine, Montana or D.C.  Repubs Dems or Tea they all work under one roof. If that doesn’t give you pause for thought, what goes on under your roof that you don’t know about, that you have no say in?

        1. Here is the Smith/Hawley tariff Act, created by two republicans in the post war era to protect American jobs and American companies:

          http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Smoot-Hawley_Tariff_Act

          And yes, Scintillate, it is true, many very important initiatives like creation of Clean Water Act were under Republican leadership.

          That was a very different Republican Party with a very different vision and very different values from the tyranny of the ignorant majority we have today holding us back in the U.S. Legislature an in many State legislatures from moving forward productively on economic recovery and a switch from consumerism to production in the U.S.

          1. I thought we were talking meds , taxes and money. Clean air and water
            never should bs e been contaminated, still waiting for those to happen.
            How about the DDT when will that be gone?
            How about makinga war to fix the mess both repubs and Dems whose
            grand idea was that?
            The bottom line is politicians period

        1. and its increase? If it has increased which it has, it is under Obama’s fault. How come are troops are not home yet? Stilled getting killed. Yes, Bush sent them, but there is a lot still there, and still getting killed. This under Obama’s watch.

      3. Oh give us a break.  Bush inherited a huge surplus from Clinton and totally SQUANDERED it, exploded the debt, flattened wages, and offshored jobs, and you TeaPubs darn well know it.  ReFoolLicans are the WORST money managers in history.  Reagan vastly exploded the debt too.  And so Bushie RUINS the economy, hands Obama a near great depression and far less revenue because Bush threw millions of people out of work and destroyed millions of businesses, and then the delusional LYING TeaPotties blame Obama for the current debt.  It is disgusting.  So enjoy the TeaPub LIES and DELUSIONS all you want. In the last 4 years Obama has created nearly 5 million jobs, restored the stock market, saved us from a great depression, cut taxes for most Americans, saved the auto industry, and took out Bin Laden. And MittTwit RobMe? A legacy of being a FAILED governor in MA who wouldn’t run for re-election because his poll numbers were in the toilet, and a business record of destroying jobs and hiding his own silver spooned millions in Bermuda, Switzerland, and the Cayman Islands. Truth hurts, doesn’t it? Yup. The TEAPOTTY is OVER come November when we SMASH them to pieces at the voting booth.  And PS:  LeBUFFOON is a pathetic JOKE and underneath the nonsensical delusions, you know that too.

        1. Well you guys are so fond of blaming Bush for everything under his Presidency, if the shoe fits where it. The deficit, including clunkers is Obama’s watch. Obama has made a mess out of the health system, trying to say Obama care will fix things. It will make a total mess out of Medicare.

          1. “The deficit, including clunkers is Obama’s watch.”

            The deficit is largely the result of putting the Bush Administration’s wars on the federal budget, where they should have been all along.

      4. “Except increse the Federal Deficit.”

        The deficit increase is because the Bush Administration kept the their wars off the budget, while Obama properly put them on the budget. The reality is that federal spending, tax rates and  deficit spending have all decreased under the Obama Administration. You are arguing with Imaginary Obama.

        1. The deficit is reduced? I do not tink so. Fuel prices are at some of the highest rates, especially before winter. Well, they always blamed Bush for high prices so, you have to do Obama too. Obama care was a mess that is going to be. You say deficit spending, what was it at the beginning of his admin, and what is it now? The buck stops at his office, cash for clunkers was that not under his admin.

      5. There is an abundance of great reading material that will dispute your claim. I hear google is a good start to research the material needed to see your ideas are all limp and lame.

  12. Attorney General William Schneider has been milking the US healthcare system for decades and now he want s to make sure no one gets any benifits.

  13. What a waste of taxpayer money. The rules are clear: The federal government has 90 days to respond to the LePage administration’s request. The feds are under no obligation to act by the timetable LePage wants.

    When is LePage going to get the hint that he can’t do whatever he wants?

    1. But it’s an election year.  Get it done before Nov. and the Republicans can tout it as an accomplishment.

  14. As the comments here attest, it is all well and good to argue about the legality of this or that healthcare issue.  However the bottom line is this; one way or another we all pay for healthcare.  Do you get that?  One way or anther we all pay!  Consequently we  we should endeavor to make healthcare for all as cheap and accessible as possible.  That means removing the “for profit” part of healthcare.  Support universal healthcare for all Americans.  It will save you money while giving all Americans equal opportunity to a long and fruitful life.  To do otherwise is merely passing the cost along to other less obvious forms of payment which are not as effective at providing good healthcare for all regardless of the cost.  And the cost will always be more when the “for profit’ motive is part of the equation.

      1. My many relatives in New Brunswick love the Canadian system.  It works!  What is more, they are long past being amused at the lies our American right-wing party spin about their healthcare system.  No one dies in Canada for lack of medicine.  No one dies in Canada because they are treated and released before dealing with the problem as Americans who lack insurance are.  Yes there is a wait for elective procedures but there is not a wait for treatment of an illness which requires immediate attention.  No one loses their home or goes bankrupt over medical bills in Canada.  And here is the kicker, people live longer in Canada!

    1. A single payer system could easily be done with a consumption fee, or tax if you like. We all consume and we all would pay. And the health care would be equal amongst all that needed it.
      Its just that simple.

  15. “The state cuts would eliminate coverage for 19- and 20-year-olds, tighten income eligibility requirements for low-income parents and scale back Medicaid access for elderly residents who also qualify for Medicare benefits.”    Don’t complain about LePage because you don’t like him, stand up and say you want to pay for able bodied adults to get medicaid!

    1.  In what part of your quote does it say able bodied adults get medicaid?I absolutely agree about the 19/20 year olds but going after the elderly/disabled isn’t how to do it.Nobody will attack the REAL problem-people under 40 afraid of their shadow and getting a check.

    1. The feds are going to deny it anyway. A state can’t ask for a waiver to balance it’s budget. Scheider’s whole argument is based on an expansive interpretation of the ACA decision on that law’s Medicare expansion provisions.

  16. And this is the same AG that could only muster a slap on the wrist and a “don’t do it any more” when Poliquin blatantly violated the state constitution. Give me a break – this guy is just a facilitator for the ultra-right to violate and/or circumvent the legal system.  

  17. It’s hard to see the meal tickets and free rides cancelled, isn’t it? Lepage is doing exactly what he promised to do during the election: Get rid of the freeloaders. It’s way past time for those who CAN work, to actually get a job. As a working person, doing a job I hate, at least I pay my own way. Get a life you bums and stay out of my back pocket.

    1. Ever stop to think we’re not lazy bums?  Most of us, like myself have paid into this system for over 30 years. It’s not an entitlement,free ride or any of that.  Its a refund of what we have paid into it

      1. Ah yes, one of the “entitlement group”. You used the services for 30 years, now you want your money back.

        1.  Can you read and comprehend?  “paid into this system for over 30 years” so that it would be there when needed: Social Security and Medicare.  These are NOT entitlements — they are assurance programs,  just like any other insurances.  You pay into them for years, then are able to collect when needed. 

          1. I can read fine, it’s you that can’t! Show me one mention of Social Security in the entire article. Social Security and Medicare are federal programs. Stop making stuff up !

          2. I guess you can read but don’t understand. I said PAID IN TO IT for 30 years, not collected. And yes we have paid into the State system. Its called state income tax, excise tax on cars, sales tax, ect. This is not made up stuff, look at your paycheck stub, if you have one

    2. The rub here, is that not everyone affected by these changes are freeloaders, as you so kindly call them.  But don’t let facts get in the way of your misguided anger about where you are in your life.

    3. How angry do you get when  state and federal pensioners are  in your back pocket also. Because the monies they are getting are paid for by you the tax payer. That money was not saved by them like the private pensioner saved during their work life. You know there is all kinds of welfare.

  18. They’re rubbing their hands like Fagin trying to dump the poor and the sick.Disgusting how they can’t wait one minute for people to sicken and die.

  19. Oh yes, anything that these TeaPublicans can do to hurt the poor and help the rich they will do.  What else is new?  How anyone could even think about voting for these corporate toadies is beyond me.  Steal from the poor and middle class and give it to the rich.  That is ALL they think and all they do.

  20. If I wasn’t a Republican when I stated reading this, I sure would be one now. I have never seen as much hate, disrespect, misinformation, made up facts and BS as I have just read here. SAD!

    1. It is not very hard to change your affiliation on your voter registration, thanks to independent voices and those who are more moderate than either far right or far left, you can even change this right up until voting day!

  21. The good old boys club seems pretty intent on pushing thru their medicare cuts.I wonder if they would be so intent if it were their perks and bennies that were being cut.Maine lawmakers have funded their companies or ones they work for on the backs of maine taxpayers for years 

  22. Five will get you ten that Mr. Schneider enjoyed a three day weekend in Boston on the taxpayer’s dime prior to filing these papers.

  23. I trust that someone in Treasurer Poliquin’s office is keeping track of the taxpayer dollars the Attorney General has spent over the past two years seeking judicial confirmation of Governor LePage’s peculiar notions of how our democracy is supposed to work and who has the authority to dictate its terms. 

  24. “The LePage administration had requested a decision by Sept. 1 when it submitted its request for the Medicaid plan amendment on Aug. 1. In Friday’s letter to LePage, acting administrator Marilyn Tavenner noted that the Medicare and Medicaid office has 90 days to review such a request.” – So spend a lot of taxpayer (my) money on a frivolous lawsuit to make a political point?  Disgusting.

  25. So they get notice of this on Friday, and Schneider files on Tuesday. Five will get you ten he used it as an excuse to spend a three-day weekend in a 5-star hotel in Boston with the Maine taxpayer footing the bill.

  26. In scanning through these comments, one is appalled to see numerous grammatical errors and spelling mistakes put forth by the right-wingnuts. It doesn’t look like they know how to use grammar-check. Hint: it’s just as easy as spell-check. It is obvious that the Republicans appeal to the poorly educated. One also notices that the liberals (usually, well-educated and able to do some independent thinking) are rarely guilty of such.
    Just an observation…

  27. the majority of the people harmed by these cuts are the working poor and their children. many have to hold two jobs just to make ends meet and still don’t have medical coverage.

  28. “If anyone has material possessions and
    sees his brother in need but has no pity on him, how can the love of God be in
    him? Dear children, let us not love with words or tongue but with actions and in
    truth.” 1 John 3:17-18

  29. It’s unconscionable that these people in control are willing to allow citizens to suffer at their stubborn hands.

    It is not right to try to make these cuts to balance the budget. People need help to survive in this world.

  30. Well, my comment is under review for using the word plague in LePage’s name as in Le + Plague.  My comment simply asked why he doesn’t just wait his turn like everyone else?  If it takes a government agency 90 days, then you should be prepared to wait 90 days!  LePage and his minions just can’t wait to cut off essential services to the aged and disabled just in time for winter!  How are people going to afford oil AND higher healthcare costs?  Can’t you at least wait until Spring?

Leave a comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *