Olympia Snowe left Congress abruptly in “the year of the woman,” and the race is on to find a leader who champions the issues that matter to women and families.

Efforts in Maine and across the United States to end access to birth control and other basic health care have rekindled the gender wars and given new emphasis to where candidates stand on so-called “women’s issues.”

It’s true that conservatives have been trying to turn back the clock on reproductive rights. Republican proposals in Congress would order a woman who needs an abortion to undergo an invasive ultrasound. Efforts have been made to defund Planned Parenthood, which provides primary and preventive health care to millions of women. The GOP also has voted to cut funding for prenatal services and seeks to repeal Obamacare — the law that, among other things, prevents insurers from charging women higher rates or denying benefits outright while covering thousands of women 26 and younger.

But there’s much more to “women’s issues” than reproductive rights.

Close to home, the Legislature has battled attempts to insert government into the sacred doctor-client privilege, and also faced efforts to weaken child labor laws, prohibit unions in women-dominated child care, shift income taxes to the middle class and put more guns in the hands of teenagers.

To support working women and their families, we must close the gender pay gap and seriously address the poverty rate among women and children, in addition to continuing the fight to ensure access to affordable health care. Laws that affect the jobs and pocketbooks of women and their families include those regarding minimum wage, family leave, child care, collective bargaining and gender discrimination.

The average female full-time worker still makes 77 cents for every $1 a man does at the same job, or $10,784 less annually, according to U.S. Census data. Over a lifetime, this is a huge gap that leads women to poverty as senior citizens. The gap shrinks to 87 cents for women in unions.

A woman making the federal minimum $7.25 an hour full-time earns $14,500 a year — $3,100 below the poverty line for a family of three. Congress has raised that wage only three times in the past 30 years, even as food prices doubled and tripled.

A Rutgers University study found that a woman who gets 30 or more days of paid maternity leave is 50 percent more likely to get a raise the year after her child’s birth than those with no paid leave.

These are the issues that women care about, not whether their representative in Congress is a maverick. Raise the minimum wage. Bolster family leave. Improve child care. Strengthen unions. And balance the budget to protect programs that help families prosper.

Before I was in government, I was holding government accountable as a civil rights lawyer fighting gender discrimination in the workplace. In six years in the Legislature, I’ve consistently voted for legislation that creates economic opportunities and protects fundamental rights, especially for women and children. The Maine Women’s Lobby gave me a 100 percent rating in its most recent review, in part because I voted to increase the minimum wage, expand family leave, strengthen unions, empower child-care workers to collectively bargain, reform the tax code, and expand broadband to rural communities where women struggle disproportionately to access education, job training and global markets.

Angus King may be independent, but he has been absent the last six years when it comes to protecting economically brutalized middle-class families, especially those led by single mothers.

While governor, King vetoed a law that would have raised the minimum wage, vetoed a law that would have given parents 24 hours a year of unpaid leave to take sick kids to the doctor, weakened labor unions and spearheaded legislation that denied the most egregiously injured workers benefits to support their families. He said these were fiscal — and not policy — decisions, but the $1.2 billion budget deficit his administration created tells a different story. We spend a lot of time in the Senate trying to close the structural budget deficit created during the King administration.

Women — 52 percent of the U.S. electorate — are woefully under-represented, comprising only 17 percent of Congress.

While you certainly don’t have to be a woman to support women’s rights, you do have to have a record of increasing the financial security of women and their families.

Cynthia Dill, a candidate for U.S. Senate, is a state senator representing South Portland, Cape Elizabeth and a portion of Scarborough.

Join the Conversation

14 Comments

  1. It’s not just about women, but the families they increasingly support financially in addition to their traditional role as home makers. And it’s not about the gender of the candidate, but the record of what they have done to bolster women and their families. Sen. Dill has the best voting record of any of the U.S. Senate candidates. Being a woman doesn’t hurt when it comes to empathy for the plight of women, but it’s not the only thing.

    1. Yes Bob, One of the Quimby 4 would love Dill to win !!  Hows your buddy Kruger doing these days ??  What a joke !

    2. Generalizing any group, be it women, different races, religions or political affiliations is what has created many injustices. There are honest and ethical people in every group, but also there are abusers of any program or entitlement. When people (and the government) realize that there is not and never will be “one size fits all” in any agenda or ideaology, we might see progress. 

  2. Guess she has to run on something other than helping Roxie ramrod her 3.2 million acre park now.  

  3. One of the biggest causes of poverty is single women having children with no committed partner in the picture.  They are ensuring a life of poverty for themselves and their children.  There is no reason that the taxpayers should have to support such poor decision making.

    1. Yes, that seems to be the GOP view: cut back assistance for the children involved and make birth-control less available so we can punish women for making such “poor decisions”.

    2. What a distorted view of women.  Believe it or not, there are many unmarried women who have children who are not living in poverty.
      And for those who are living in poverty, what do you suggest?  Letting children starve to death or live in cardboard boxes under the bridge? 

      1. No one (that I know) wants children to suffer. We also know that there are indeed  single women who do not have to raise their children in poverty. But will you negate the fact that many (not all) who are demanding free birth control don’t appear to use it?

  4. Did Ms. Dill pay herself from her PAC to write this column?
    Or is it just her blog she pays herself to write?

  5. How about a ‘Year of the Children’? You know, those cuddly little bundles of joy that are going to spend fifty of their next sixty-five years paying off all the government debt Ms. Dill and her ilk are now buying votes with?

    Regrettably, I have to include the Republicans in ‘ilk’ (see Susan Collins and the Eastern Maine Processing and Distribution Facility in Hampden, for instance).  But some of the Republicans at least pay lip service to constraining reckless spending, and something may yet come of that.

  6. Looks to me like Dill believes she should get votes just because she is a woman and would fight for “women issues”. As a woman voter, I would love to see more women in our government, BUT the women I would vote for would most certainly need to be intelligent enough to do so. From what I have seen of this woman, she is NOT one I would cast a vote for even though I am also a Dem. “Creative” finances, involving herself in issues out of her district while there are so many issues in her own district to deal with, stupid publicity stunts…the list could go on as to why I will not vote for Dill.

    1. Since (at this writing) the article above came out, two days ago, and presently there are only 11 posts, I think (hope) we have nothing to worry about, MaineKat!  I think her “overwhelming support”  is all in her head.
      Furthermore, I haven’t taken the time to verify her typical “factual” statements in this article, but in the past it is well known by those who are curious enough to “verify”, many of her statements are either baseless or are created from statistical studies of the year 2000-2001.  Pathetic and pitiful to think that this woman thinks she could ever replace Olympia Snowe. 

  7. Guess Bob didn’t read this. Not only is the title about women, but the entire article. So, Bob, perhaps you should let Dill know it is about more than the gender of a candidate. lol As for your claim that Dill has “the best voting record of any of the U.S. Senate candidates” I believe a quick search would show what a wild claim that one is.

Leave a comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *