BANGOR, Maine — State Sen. Nichi Farnham on Wednesday responded to the Maine Democratic Party’s request for a Maine Ethics Commission investigation into allegations that she improperly coordinated with a political action committee to funnel $73,000 into advertising targeting her opponent.

In a letter to ethics commission staff, attorney William Logan asserted that Farnham never discussed the advertising expenditure with the political action committee, the Maine Senate Republican Majority PAC, and that she wasn’t aware of the ad buy.

Democrats earlier this month filed a formal complaint with the Maine Ethics Commission alleging that Farnham, a first-term state senator from Bangor, violated rules surrounding so-called independent expenditures because Farnham was listed as a principal officer and decision maker for the Senate Republican Majority PAC when the committee purchased $73,000 in television advertising targeting her opponent, Democrat Geoffrey Gratwick.

“There were no discussions whatsoever between Sen. Farnham and the PAC regarding any of the PAC’s independent expenditures,” Logan wrote. “In short, Sen. Farnham had no knowledge of any expenditures made by the PAC, and played no role in making any decisions related to expenditures. That is quite simply because Sen. Farnham had disassociated from the PAC well before the PAC began to make decisions related to independent expenditures.”

Maine election law allows outside groups such as political action committees and political parties to make unlimited independent expenditures supporting or opposing candidates as long as the expenditures aren’t coordinated with candidates. Under state election law, if a political committee coordinates an expenditure with a candidate, the expenditure counts as a contribution to the candidate.

Farnham is running as a publicly funded candidate under the Maine Clean Election Act, which means she’s prohibited from accepting any kind of contribution. But even candidates who don’t receive public funds can’t accept contributions larger than $350.

The Democrats’ complaint stemmed from $102,000 in TV advertising the Senate Republican Majority PAC recently purchased targeting Democratic Senate candidates in three districts. The bulk of the ad buy targeted Gratwick, according to an expenditure report the PAC filed Wednesday with the Maine Ethics Commission.

Maine Democratic Party chairman Ben Grant called the case “an egregious violation” of state election law. “The fact that it has been committed by the chair of the committee responsible for Maine campaign finance laws makes it particularly galling,” he said.

Farnham is chairwoman of the Legislature’s Veterans and Legal Affairs Committee, which has jurisdiction over election matters that come before the Legislature.

When the Democrats filed their complaint, the Maine Senate Republican Majority PAC’s registration paperwork, filed with the state Ethics Commission on Feb. 3, listed Farnham and Sen. Thomas Saviello, R-Wilton, as the principal officers and the “primary fundraisers and decision makers.”

Farnham said earlier this month she agreed to be listed temporarily as a principal officer for the PAC, but that she never intended to be involved with the committee during the election season. A consultant for the PAC, James Cote, said her name should have been removed from the paperwork and that it was “an administrative oversight” that her name remained on the paperwork.

In an affidavit included with her response to the ethics commission, Farnham said she has had no involvement with the committee since March.

The ethics commission will take up the complaint at an Oct. 31 meeting.

Since filing the complaint, Democrats and their allies have made the ethics allegations against Farnham a political rallying point. Some 25 Bangor residents called attention to the allegations Tuesday at a rally organized in part by the state Democratic Senate Campaign Committee. And a political committee backed by Democratic-leaning groups, the Committee to Rebuild Maine’s Middle Class, has produced anti-Farnham TV and radio ads detailing the Democrats’ complaint.

Republicans also have filed an ethics commission complaint against Gratwick, alleging some of his campaign mail lacked a required funding disclosure statement.

The Senate Republican Majority PAC is the state Republican party’s primary campaign arm for state Senate seats.

Join the Conversation

50 Comments

  1. As stated before, Nichi Farnham is a lady of high integrity,  and she would not be a part of anything unethical or illegal. 

      1. 80% of Maine people voted AGAINST democratic ideology in the last election….now lets see….who did Maine voters think was the guilty or incompatant ones….dont tell me……let me guess…

    1. It is possible for the same person to have integrity and be unethical.  It’s not all or nothing. Regardless of the details, the way that she’s handled this mess, and her whole campaign, should convince you that she’s not the person you want representing you.

      1. I think what you meant is that She has handled this issue just fine, but how she has been dragged through the mud for clearly political reasons, with the backing of Dr, Tax Gratwick, is the problem. She has the integrity, its the your Dems who have been unethical.

    2. That she has been active in this PAC shows that she is NOT the “nicey nice moderate” she presents herself to be in public.  She is a TEAPublican right winger who votes with LeBUFFOON 92% of the time.  She does not represent the values of the district.  She even voted for the LIES used to try to remove same-day voter registration.  THAT is enough reason to get rid of her.  She SHOULD have known she was still listed as a leader of this PAC because she allowed herself to be listed, just as she SHOULD have known that she actually did have to run for re-election this year.  (MY GOD, who would ever vote for an INCUMBENT who didn’t even realize her own term of office??)  Her husband has recently given a thousand dollars to this PAC, she was listed as a leader just last February and had been active in the PAC as of just last March, and she should have darn welll known better.  What are we going to do, give a free pass to election law violators every time they say, “Oops, I forgot to remove myself from the paperwork?”  NO!  She is a State Senator and grown adult who is supposed to be abreast of these things, and if she didn’t want to be associated, she shouldn’t have allowed herself to be associated in the first place.  That she did is reason enough to be rid of her, let alone her 11th hour rush to fix her mess.  She needs a good hefty fine as the VIOLATOR she is.

      1. look Tinkerbell, Her fine will be that she is re-elected and the People of Maine will have spoken about this false attack on her integrity. And that will be…’fine’…

  2. It is plain to see that when a candidate can’t win with their political philosopies; then it is time to try and ruin their advesary with hyped up charcater assasinations!

    1. When talking about making character assasinations, you are obviously talking about the Republicans.

  3. “And a political committee backed by Democratic-leaning groups, the Committee to Rebuild Maine’s Middle Class, has produced anti-Farnham TV and radio ads detailing the Democrats’ complaint.”
    Interesting that they’re spending so much money talking about ethics violations that haven’t even proven to be true yet.  Farnham must’ve done a good job in the legislature because the dems aren’t going after her for issues that matter.  

  4. Farnham said earlier this month she agreed to be listed temporarily as a principal officer for the PAC, but that she never intended to be involved with the committee during the election season
    Are you kidding me!?!

  5. i will be on your board but just put my name there so i can get the credit   ….. BUT   if it comes out….  i had nothing to do with you.               you and I would be held accountable   why not her

  6. Like doing the same thing for 35 years with the same poor results, Maine’s Democratic Party simply cannot give up on trying to fabricate ethics violations.  Desperation is a losing tactic, folks, and greatly impairs your credibility and the effectiveness of decent members of the Democratic party who do not engage in the slimly tactics of the Left.

    Also, please note that this kind of manufactured crap does not seem to be working on the national level.  After months and months of hearing the Obama campaign’s version of who and what Romney is, I was pleasantly surprised to discover that the Romney that appeared at the debates bore no resemblance to the caricature promoted by the Democrats.  What a way to squander credibility and blow an election!

    1.  Kinda like the Charlies and their blatant and unproven accusations of “Voter Fraud”?  Seems like that was not a Dem fabrication, East!

  7. She has many apologists, but I am not impressed with Sen. Farnham’s actions. She is a cheat at worst, and aloof at best. Time for a change in representation.

    1. Senator Farnham- 62%
      Dr. Tax Gratwick- 34%

      Just a guess at why this attack on the Senator and a guess at the result….all for fun or course…

  8. James Cote, said her name should have been removed from the paperwork and that it was “an administrative oversight” that her name remained on the paperwork.
    Oh yeah, just an oversight yeah that’s it.

  9. Maine Dems try running on a platform about how you will imrove The Maine economic landscape and let the regulatory Politicsl agencies do thier job instead of witch hunt posing asca platform!

    1. You mean like Charlie Summers and Charlie Webster and their voter ID witch hunt? Find any witches did you? No? Surprise.

    1. How do you know she is not lying in the face of so much evidence against her?

      Maybe you’re being taken for a ride.

  10. Why do the Dem’s alway have to tear down others to get an advantage? It’s always about the others and never about them. Obama tears down Romney, but can’t tell people what he can do for the country. Nichi has done a good job. If you don’t agree with her vote for the other person. Stop complaining…

    1. I’d be happy if “R”s could see the dirtballs they keep voting for as something less than saints.

      1. um…80% of Mainers voted for someone other than democrats…with approx 49% registered repubs….so…what is it you are saying about mainers?

  11. you are absolutley false about her invlovment and have not a lick of evidence to back up such a scurrilous and defamatory claim…..but please….continue…..

    1. So you are claiming that when she signed the legal forms showing her to be ” principal officer and decision maker” she was falsifying legal documents?
      .
      Wow, that’s even WORSE than what what others are claiming. Lying and falsifying legal instruments is a felony.
      .
      You must really dislike and distrust her to make that assertion.

        1. She says she was a placeholder.  I’m pretty sure that means she didn’t plan to run for reelection but put her name on the nominating papers holding a place for someone else who they were trying to convince to run but hadn’t yet.  That person was termed out and prevented from running for the office they held at that time.  (This other potential candidate must have been a Republican House of Representatives member in that senate district who is termed out this year. Shuld be easy to figure out who).  This “placeholding” is the game these politicians play in Augusta to keep themselves and/or their friends in office.

          She was planning to be on the PAC while this other person ran for her senate seat.  When the termed-out  candidate refused to run, she reluctantly stayed on the ballot and forgot to take herself off of the PAC board.

  12. Nichi Farnham is innocent of anything unethical unless proven guilty.  A complaint has been filed and the commissuioon will decide.   I believe her innocence.

    1. And if she was a “D” you’d claim she was guilty. Partisan garbage. Um…yeah…I’m sure she didn’t know she was head of the PAC of a $73,000 ad campaign which blasted Gratwick. Riiiiight. 

  13. This is not a Democratic/Republican issue…..It is an issue of fairness.  I don’t care one whit who wins elections because I don’t think they are relevant to anything important….But just for the sake of the game…Let’s be fair and play by he rules. As Sen.Gene McCarthy used to say, “Politics is like being a football coach; you’ve got to be smart enough to understand the game and dumb enough to think it’s important.”

    1. um..this is not fottball…that is a great quote for football, but take a look around….if the legislative process is irrevelant, than who in your opinion will find solutions to this states serious problems…

  14. Just received another negative mailer from Farnham and her Republican friends. I guess she has nothing positive to say about her own record.

    1. Party can send out anything it wants you know…if you have questions, call the party headquarters and see who is sending them…..its no different than the democrats…..both sides can send them ad nauseum, without the candidates knowledge or approval…

      1. The only negative mailings I see are from republicans. All I ever see from Farnham are negative mailings. I found the same thing to be true during her last campaign. As far as I am concerned the candidate is responsible even if someone else puts their name on the mailing.

  15. “It was a mistake and the attacks are politically motivated”  How original!

    Heard it a thousand times. The Mayor of  DC used it even they had him on video smoking crack with a hooker.

    It has become the “the dog ate my homework” for politicians.   Is anyone still buying this anymore?

    1. Yeah… Nobama’s working that line pretty hard after four Americans were murdered “over a movie trailer”…

Leave a comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *