AUGUSTA, Maine — The six candidates who aspire to be Maine’s next U.S. senator have spent months laying out plans for what they would do if elected. But they can expect to arrive at a place where doing nothing has become the norm and where balancing the interests of the state and nation has become increasingly difficult.
Democrat Cynthia Dill, Republican Charlie Summers and independents Angus King, Danny Dalton, Andrew Ian Dodge and Steve Woods are competing to succeed retiring Republican Sen. Olympia Snowe.
Maine’s next senator needs to “find common ground and keep the best interests of the people of Maine — and all Americans — in the forefront,” former Senate Majority Leader George J. Mitchell, said Wednesday. He was echoed by Snowe, who said, “The country has been placed on hold on so many issues that contribute to whether or not we can change the course on jobs, the debt, the deficit and the quality of life so many Americans cherish.”
Budget and economy
Although “pork” has become a dirty word, states rely heavily on federal funding and the Senate plays a huge role in how that money is allocated.
Maine receives more money from the U.S. government than it pays into federal coffers. In August 2011, the Economist reported that between 1990 and 2009, federal spending in Maine outpaced its federal tax payments by $75.6 billion. The magazine places Maine behind only six states as the greatest recipient of federal largesse.
A Tax Foundation calculation based on 2005 numbers ranks Maine 13th — receiving $1.41 back for every dollar paid to the feds — in terms of return on payments to the federal government.
A new senator might find good reason to continue that flow of cash.
“If you invest federal dollars in early childhood, you help reduce the cost of K-12 education, of welfare, incarceration and crime because you have created a healthier, more self-sufficient individual,” said Laurie LaChance, president of Thomas College in Waterville and former state economist.
But immediate concerns about the debt and federal spending might preclude that type of investment.
“The biggest issues we will face are fiscal issues,” Maine Republican Sen. Susan Collins said Wednesday in a phone interview. “We have a $16 trillion debt that’s unsustainable. We have needs in everything,” from a crumbling infrastructure to security against terrorism including cyberattacks.
“We will need to revitalize our economy in a way that doesn’t worsen our debt,” Collins added. “It’s been three years since the Senate passed a budget, and that’s outrageous. We need to stop kicking the can down the road on issues that are so important to our families and our country’s prosperity.”
As a matter of economic security, Snowe says Maine’s new senator must contribute immediately to consensus-building that will break Congress’ political and procedural status quo, which inhibits businesses from planning for the future with any sense of security.
Scott Moody, president of the conservative Maine Heritage Policy Center, agreed.
“The country cannot afford this unsustainable accumulation of debt because it is fueling another time bomb, which is the interest payments,” Moody wrote in an email.
But any talk of trimming either Social Security or Medicare to balance the budget or reduce debt upsets a large segment of the state’s population.
With a median age of 42.7 and 16.3 percent of its population age 65 or older, Maine has a rapidly aging population that’s comparatively more dependent on social programs. A third of Mainers older than 65 rely solely on Social Security as their income source, according to Lori Parham, Maine state director for AARP. The average annual benefit for Mainers receiving Social Security is $13,100, according to the AARP Public Policy Institute.
Transportation
The tension between taking action to reduce the national debt and ensuring that Maine’s most pressing transportation infrastructure needs are met will pose another challenge. All states receive more for transportation than they pay into federal coffers. An October 2012 Center for American Progress report notes that Maine received $1.46 in Federal Highway Administration funding for every $1 the state paid into the Highway Trust Fund in 2008, adjusted for the two-year lag in payment.
David Cole, who served as the state’s transportation commissioner from 2003 until 2011, noted the new senator soon will be “in the middle of a major debate on what will hopefully be a longer-term highway reauthorization bill to address the country’s aging infrastructure and economic competitiveness.” The recently enacted federal transportation bill, MAP-21, runs out at the end of September 2014. The estimated allocation of Federal Highway Administration funds under MAP-21 to Maine for fiscal year 2012 is $178.8 million, according to the U.S. Department of Transportation.
But the ground rules will be different.
“For many years the federal Highway Trust Fund was a healthy and reliable source of funds to build our nation’s highways, bridges and transit systems, but the gas tax that supports it is no longer a sustainable model due to more fuel-efficient vehicles coming on line,” Cole said.
To highlight Maine’s situation, Cole cited “Connecting Maine,” a long-range transportation plan completed in 2010 that identifies about $3 billion in unmet need based on historic funding levels.
“We were very fortunate to have Sen. Snowe on the Senate Finance Committee, which is obviously a key position,” said Maria Fuentes, executive director of the Maine Better Transportation Association. “We are also fortunate to have Sen. Collins on the Appropriations Committee, where already she has proven her mettle by getting the truck weights legislation passed in Senate. … It will be difficult for a new senator to have the clout of someone like Sen. Snowe since she was there for so long, but without people in key positions, Maine will be at a big disadvantage.”
Energy and environment
The nation’s energy policy has prompted significant debate in this year’s U.S. Senate campaigns, but opinions in Maine differ on where those policies should focus.
“What America and Maine thrive on is abundant and affordable energy,” said Jamie Py of the Maine Energy Marketers Association. “We need to seriously enhance North American supply of oil, gas and other sources of energy, especially if we have an abundance of oil, gas and coal. We can look at renewables, but in the short term we need to ensure we have an adequate supply.”
Beth Nagusky, Maine director of Environment Northeast, argues that federal energy policy must acknowledge and account for climate change.
“The ski industry, maple syrup, forestry, fishing and farming all stand to be impacted,” she said. “It would be a disservice to the state if Maine’s next senator did not take on global warming.”
“Energy has long been a disadvantage to Maine,” said LaChance. “Greater federal support for conservation and independence could help minimize the disadvantage Maine has on energy. It would foster business growth and add security to families.”
Education
Much of the communication about state and national education reform initiatives takes place between the Maine Department of Education and federal officials. However, with Maine’s fiscal year 2012 allocation of federal funds for elementary and secondary student programs estimated at more than $147 million, the stakes make it imperative that Maine’s next senator be a strong advocate for Maine schools, educators say.
Action on the federal level sets the stage for what happens in the state, LaChance said.
“We have to focus on regaining the national and state dominance in education,” she said. “The way the world economy is evolving requires ever-increasing levels of education if we are going to compete. Education across the entire spectrum of life is the most important thing we can do.”
The latest report on Maine schools’ compliance with federal No Child Left Behind standards, released this week, shows that only 35 percent of Maine schools met the federal targets. That adds importance to the Maine Department of Education’s effort to gain flexibility from those standards with a waiver request submitted in September.
“I believe that the next senator from Maine needs to understand the importance of local control of education in Maine,” said Connie Brown, superintendent of the Augusta School Department. She also would like to see Maine’s next senator ensure the Elementary and Secondary Education Act, also known as No Child Left Behind, become more flexible with testing.
“The current obsession with standardized testing needs to be tempered with allowing children to be curious, to explore and to take their time to learn,” Brown said.
What to expect
Collins said committee assignments will be important for her new colleague because that’s where much of the Senate’s work takes place. Collins and Snowe agreed that continuing the close collaboration on committee assignments they have enjoyed during the past 14 years will be essential.
“The Senate is a small place,” Collins said. “Having good relations with people on both sides of the aisle makes you a good senator.”
Asked to offer a single piece of wisdom acquired during their years in the Senate, Collins and Snowe echoed Mitchell’s advice to “find common ground and keep the best interests of the people of Maine — and all Americans — in the forefront.”
“It’s a time in America that requires urgent action and tangible solutions,” Snowe said, reiterating that the first step toward those tangible solutions will be to break through the “polarization and partisanship” that reflect the “strong divisions within the institution” of the Senate.
When asked Wednesday to compare that challenge to attaining peace in Northern Ireland, former Sen. Mitchell smiled, shook his head and walked away.



“The Senate is a small place,” Collins said. “Having good relations with
people on both sides of the aisle makes you a good senator.”
Angus is that person.
Angus King 2012!
So, you’re actually a comedian, right? For a moment there I thought you were serious! lol.
I think the ” independants ” are left out of the committee selection process and are dealt the leftovers. Not a good position for any state !
Ask Lieberman and Sanders – You will see that you are wrong!
“A new senator might find good reason to continue that flow of cash.” Sure, let’s keep taking $1.41 for every dollar we send in. Who cares, as long as someone (anyone) else makes up the difference. Now THAT is typical liberal fiscal policy!
So . . . we should take less and send in more. Uh huh. Just dig a little deeper in our pockets so we can fund those many failed military projects that benefit other states and line Republican pockets. Right. Now THAT is typical conservative fiscal policy.
We , like this country , should spend only what we take in.
So . . I can assume that you paid cash, in toto, for your last house and/or car ? Or did you finance it or them, borrowing money and paying in back in pieces with dollars made somewhat cheaper by inflation over the payback period ?
paid cash for the last two vehicles purchased…..only debt service is on the mortgage and at 4.6% for their interest, I’m crushing real inflation over the 20 year term
Bankers own this planet and will continue to do so until the day humans learn to stop playing their games…
Good for you ! You’ll be humming all the way to work when the inevitable inflation hits. And the bank will probably call you then with an alternative “good deal”.
I’m not liberal or conservative and think for myself. However, I do know that Bill Clinton left a big surplus when he left office and it was all gone before Obama came in. Bill Clinton believes Obama can assist in bringing it back, in time while Romney and Ryan want to take away from seniors and give us some type of token voucher plan instead of actual dollars. Simple choice for me.
Hey clueless – Obama / Reid / Pelosi haven’t passed a budget – even one of their own making! They should be in jail, and if they were republican, the media and the country would make it so.
Hey Clueless! How many have been presented and shot down by the useless Ropub Congressmen? (clue) ALL! They were even voting against their own bills when they drew bi-partisan support.
Favorite rant of the day:
“.. red states have the highest percentage of folks taking federal dollars out of the system even as they whine and swagger about being “small government” advocates; the casual and clueless, almost daily, exhibitions of racism common in the South; the glorification of traitors known as the worship of the “lost cause” of the Confederacy.”
Second favorite rant of the day:
“Hang out in my living room on any national election night and at some point in the evening, usually around 7 p.m. Pacific time, you’re almost certain to hear me scream something like: “Why in the hell does the United States—and by extension the entire free world, capitalist dominion, and all of Christendom—allow its government to be held hostage by a coalition of bought-and-paid-for political swamp scum from the most uneducated, morbidly obese, racist, indigent, xenophobic, socially stunted, and generally ass-backwards part of the country?” Dixie
Because of—- “Democrazy” !
Ain’t it Great!
The only place in the world where Millionaires and Billionaires spend “Millions” in Dollars to convince the electorate that they need Tax Breaks in order to provide them with jobs!
LOL
surpluses and deficits address annual revenues only. Sure Clinton had a ‘projected’ surplus for two years but the money was quickly spent by eager politicians, and certainly Bush and company comprised the majority of those politicians. However, the Rs did NOT act alone in spending the surplus revenue and had plenty of bipartisan support in the spend-athon….including the money spent on Iraq and Afghanistan.
The national debt at the end of Clinton’s term was around 5 Trillion and not one single dime was spent to pay down the balance…his ‘surplus’ was effectively meaningless
For those of you who want to cut federal spending let me draw your attention to the figures from 1990-2009. 75.6 billion more was sent to Maine over the amount in federal taxes. How many jobs do you want to sacrifice?
Looting your neighbors is dishonorable: and looting your neighbors’ children (which is what deficit spending amounts to) is almost literally ‘taking candy from a baby’. How much honor do you want to sacrifice?
I imagine it is honorable to create a society of homeless, starving unemployed.
That is what current policy does plus add dependent.
So I assume that you would be in favor of cutting all federal money sent to the State of Maine? This would immediately solve the homeless, food, and employment problem? If the concept of receiving more federal money than what is paid in federal taxes offends you it might be a good idea for you to move to a county in Maine that receives the least in federal money. Or, even better, move to a state that pays more in federal taxes than it receives so that your superior attitude has a basis in fact.
Or Cheesecake could move to Greece, which is what the US will be like if we continue to follow our current path.
From what has been said … Cheesecake already knows what the US will be like maybe dhume should travel to Greece so HE, or she, can see where we will be going.
I’ve already been to Greece. Unlike Larry I can’t foresee the future. I can see the present and I can see that if federal dollars are cut and nothing is put in their place a lot more people will be hurting. Now if you want to cut federal dollars let’s cut them all. Shut down Bath Iron Works and any other recipients of federal money. How about having the State of Maine get fewer dollars back from their federal taxes? So Larry, what’s your solution?
I have already told you my solution. Slowly wean people from the teat of government, before the whole darn economy collapses.
I was in Greece for a year in ’73 & 74 and was astounded how the “cradle of civilization” had improved over the centuries. The first thing I noticed was guards at the airport armed with automatic weapons.
Nice but what does slowly wean mean? Where do you start? Does it involve increasing taxes? If I remember wasn’t the Baader-Meinhof group and Carlos the Jackle the terrorists of the day? Now we have the guards at the airports, and at times of increased anxiety, with automatic weapons. But that is relatively meaningless since terrorism has been with us for a long long time.
Simple, start bt getting the able bodied off welfare, bring military units back to the US and use them on the borders, lower subsidisies to non viable corporations, pass laws protecting jobs for American citizens, get rid of Obamacare … I could go on and on but there is a start.
But it is up to the voters to create a congress that has the guts to do these things, and I doubt that the voters are willing to give up “their’s” enough to make these sacrifices possible.
terrorism is ancient and will never go away, but we can cut government support for it by making it no longer profitable for government sponsorship.
Easier said than done even with a compliant Congress. It all depends on how you define “able-bodied” “subsidies” “non-viable” and the problem of jobs isn’t protecting them its getting them back from overseas. To bring jobs back from overseas you are going to have to pay a lot more for the products made here. You would also have to pay a lot more for agricultural products if they are harvested by American citizens assuming that the military could seal off the borders. In addition, if you get rid of Obamacare your insurance rates would continue to rise faster than with Obamacare since people without insurance would continue to use emergency rooms and the costs of their inability to pay would be passed on the rest of us.
That is what has to happen, if it isn’t then our economy will fail and the problem will solve itself. I and many others will die and or live in abject poverty and folks like you will stand around and try to figure out what happened.
As the mechanic said about oil changes .. you can pay me now or pay me later.
We either fix the problem now or let it go until everything fails. take your choice.
SHUT UP Larry…..you’re ruining Mr. Hume’s American dream!!
You’re right. The reason I said what I said is because dhume suggested that Cheesecake move to another state that spends more than it contributes. My point was that Greece is a perfect example of what happens when outgo exceeds income as dhume wrongly thinks is ok. Thanks.
Subject: [bdn] Re: Send money, cut spending and welcome to the Senate
larryincamden wrote, in response to libsux:
From what has been said … Cheesecake already knows what the US will be like maybe dhume should travel to Greece so HE, or she, can see where we will be going.
Link to comment
Yes, cutting Federal aid to the states to support the poor will cause changes to peoples lifestyles, but if it is not done all at once yhose people will survive.
If the aid is cut off suddenly by the federal government collapsing far fewer people will survive and the pain will be far worse.
Make no mistake, if spending is not brought under control the government will collapse in the future.
This is not just a question of cutting federal aid to the poor. If you check out the graph you will see that federal money is spent in many areas. You would be creating more poor by cutting federal aid since salaries and procurement etc. are also paid for by federal money
My freaking point is that it will be worse if it isnt fixed before the economy goes over the cliff.
You only point out why we can not fix it under the present course of action. Which is a stupid option. Not that I think YOU are stupid.
Larry, don’t even bother poking the sleeping American bears….
just remember, these are the ‘compassionate’ people, the reality of an unsustainable, centrally planned fiat economy and the massive poverty and destitution that inevitably will come to pass in its wake is of no interest to them, because when the truth is posed before them in such a manner their only response is, “Shut up and stop ruining my Ameirican dream”!
And of course, the thing about the American dream is that you’ve gotta be asleep to believe it!
Are you still under the impression that spending money we don’t have – and that ‘net-payer’ states don’t have – will have any other result in the long term?
Speaking of comedians, Al Franken is in the senate and that is a joke.
We who laugh last, laugh best. Yahoo AL!!
“Asked to offer a single piece of wisdom acquired during their years in the Senate, Collins and Snowe echoed Mitchell’s advice to “find common ground and keep the best interests of the people of Maine — and all Americans — in the forefront.”
“It’s a time in America that requires urgent action and tangible solutions,” Snowe said, reiterating that the first step toward those tangible solutions will be to break through the “polarization and partisanship” that reflect the “strong divisions within the institution” of the Senate. If they are so sure these are the needs of the country then they need to be in Washington on the senate floor preaching. Their leadership is needed more in rallying the troops so to speak than bowing wind into the news media. Get all your cronnies off their dead butts and start taking care of the country. I am not paying you to be followers i am paying you to be leaders.