AUGUSTA, Maine — New polling data released this week on the election to succeed Olympia Snowe as a U.S. senator from Maine already have begun reshaping campaign strategies as the race enters its final 46 days.

A survey by the Maine People’s Research Center pegged independent U.S. Senate candidate Angus King’s support at 44 percent. Republican Charlie Summers followed with 28 percent, and Democrat Cynthia Dill netted 15 percent. The survey indicates that 7 percent remained undecided in the contest, and a combined 6 percent chose independents Steve Woods, Andrew Ian Dodge or Danny Dalton.

North Carolina-based Public Policy Polling placed Summers much closer to King, who registered 43 percent support in a survey conducted Sept. 17 and 18. Summers came in at 35 percent and Dill garnered support from 14 percent of those polled. The firm’s poll — which didn’t ask about Woods, Dodge and Dalton — found 8 percent of respondents undecided.

Republicans pounced on the new results — which reflect a double-digit decline from the 55 percent support King received in the most recent public survey, a June poll done by Critical Insights — as proof that King’s popularity among voters is rapidly waning.

“These numbers are even more interesting than they initially appear,” Matthew Gagnon, a Republican strategist, wrote Thursday on his Pine Tree Politics blog. “According to polling analyst Nate Silver of the New York Times, in the 2012 election cycle, PPP has what is known as a ‘house effect’ of 3.1 percent in favor of the Democrats. … Given that King is rightly viewed as the de facto Democrat in the race, that suggests that the race may be even tighter than this poll suggests.”

Even if the latest polls show a closer race, Silver wrote Thursday on his FiveThirtyEight: Political Calculus blog that his calculation model still “gives Mr. King an 84 percent chance of winning, Mr. Summers 11 percent, and Mrs. Dill 5 percent.”

“I don’t subscribe to some of the breathless analysis that the new polling data shows a significant decline for King,” said Michael Cuzzi, a former Democratic campaign strategist who manages the Portland office of VOX Global, a Washington, D.C.-based public affairs consulting firm.

Cuzzi called the latest poll numbers “a more reasonable snapshot of the race.”

King “was never going to get 50 percent in a three-way race,” he said.

“I think the important thing to realize with these numbers is that it’s a reality check,” Cuzzi said. “Expectations around Angus King were otherworldly. Today, they still show a pretty strong advantage for Angus King. If he wins by 8 or 10 or 12 percent, that’s still a very significant margin in a three-way race.”

The impact of new polling data quickly manifested itself in campaign activities.

Striving to defang attack ads from national Republican groups, the King campaign fired back Thursday with a list of Republican “mistruths, accusations and personal attacks” against King, and a call for Summers to demand that the National Republican Senatorial Committee and the U.S. Chamber of Commerce pull ads critical of King from the airwaves. King also spent Thursday fundraising in Washington, D.C.

Meanwhile, Summers’ campaign drew attention to national political analyses that deem the U.S. Senate race in Maine to be competitive, with Summers gaining on King.

The narrowing poll margin should spur Summers to “relentlessly challenge King, to continue to dislodge voters from his camp while simultaneously focusing on building up his own favorability numbers,” Gagnon wrote Friday in an email to the BDN. “He needs to offer a viable, real alternative to voters who sour on King.”

Gagnon suggested that Summers emulate Sen. Scott Brown, R-Mass., who in 2010 ran a series of ads that “focused positively on his ideas, personality and approach to government” after polling data showed his opponent, Democrat Martha Coakley, slipping in the polls.

Brown won over undecided or wavering “regular Massachusetts” voters with his “famous truck ad (Scott Brown is just a regular guy driving a beat-up old truck who is concerned about the country),” Gagnon said. “Summers needs to do something similar. He has to fill the vacuum left by voters who no longer believe that King is who he says he is, and he has to do that by offering a positive vision of who he is and why he would be a good senator.”

In an effort to sway undecided Republicans or Republican-leaning independents, Summers’ campaign pointed to PPP analyst Tom Jensen’s suggestion that King “may need to more explicitly say he’s going to organize as a Democrat if he wants to win this race.” King has consistently declined to say whether he would caucus with either party if elected.

Cuzzi labeled Jensen’s suggestion “ridiculous” and said doing so would be “incredibly harmful” to King’s campaign. “It would be antithetical to everything King has built his campaign upon,” he said.

Instead, King must use the remainder of the campaign to “paint a much clearer picture of what he wants to accomplish in the U.S. Senate,” Cuzzi said. “Much of the campaign has been about his personality and process of changing the Senate.”

At this point, King needs to “make a forceful, compelling argument to elect him in the face of this money coming in from outside,” Cuzzi said.

Cuzzi and Gagnon both believe the new polling data will encourage more spending from national groups to influence the Senate race in Maine.

Polling data in other states reflects a shrinking likelihood that Republicans can gain a majority in the U.S. Senate this year. Silver on Thursday calculated the chances of the Democrats retaining control of the Senate at 79 percent, up 9 points from Tuesday. For that reason, Cuzzi expects national Republican groups to funnel more money into Maine. “They see a race that is on the margins and potentially that they can move,” he said.

The new poll results “send a signal to activists, supporters, volunteers, operatives and donors who may have been sitting on the sidelines that something is going on here, and that their time, effort and money will not be wasted, as it would have been before,” Gagnon said. “Getting that energy and money off the sidelines is the single most important thing that changes in polling can do. It can also lead ally groups to smell an opportunity and begin to play in the race, as you saw the NRSC recently do.”

Cuzzi dismisses speculation that national Democratic party groups would buy ads to support King indirectly, assuming he would caucus with Democrats, as a way to counter ad buys by conservative groups, such as Freedom PAC, designed to weaken King’s progressive base by trumpeting Dill.

“If they did so, I think it would harm [King] with any moderate Republicans and unenrolled voters,” he said. Doing so could damage both King and Dill and “create a running lane for Summers.”

Gaining but still trailing badly in the polls, Dill “must remain an aggressor, challenging Summers and King and creating distinctions on issues that resonate beyond the Democratic base,” Cuzzi said. “Without funds to pay for significant advertising, Dill must deploy her allies and create newsworthy campaign events that spread her message in the traditional media and online.”

Join the Conversation

50 Comments

  1. Yep. King demands that the outside groups stop bring up his record as Gov. King wants the public to believe is version of his time as Gov. 

    1.  Usual counter attack from one of Karl (Turd Blossom) Rove’s handlers, we see through your lies, shame on u.

      1.  Not my lies. King failure as Gov. Look at those facts, all a matter of public record. Go a head believe King version if it makes you feel better. NEVER let facts get in the way of your decision.

  2.   Matt Gagnon”s opinions in this matter are about as reliable and “independent” as the opinions of Charlie Summers’ wife.  Matt is like the man falling out of a 40 story building.  If you ask him how he’s doing as he passes a tenth story window he’d say “pretty good so far.”  Charlie Summers is doing “pretty good so far.”
      Can we say “Senator King.”

    1.   He won’t be part of the rabid Republican caucus, as would Summers, would vote for responsible budgeting that included tax increases, would do far more to protect Social Security and Medicare, and would not reflexively vote for more Pentagon spending.  Would I prefer a Democrat? Yes.  Can Dill win?  No.

      1. And wouldn’t drop the ball for the Vets like those other idiots did.  I need to say Thank You Sen. Snowe and Sen. Collins.  I take back every bad thing I said about you.

      2. His flirtation with the wrongheaded austerity of Simpson-Bowles is responsible only when compared to the “return to the 1890’s” proposals of Paul Ryan. If you prefer Dill, vote for her. National and many local Democrats are scared of the LePage election. Conditions are not the same.

        1. I agree that the flirtation with Simpson-Bowles is wrongheaded.  Politics is the art of the possible; until we have instant run-off voting, I am going to vote strategically.

          1. Well, after your corrupt buddies President Rove, Cheney The Friend Shooter, and Shrubby Puppet Bushie nearly destroyed the nation and left us in fiscal ruin, I’d say the current President has done pretty darn well.  So keep on inhaling the Fake-News and Rush Limpmind delusion gas.  Come November 6th, the MittTwit, aka The Hater Of At Least Half The Country By His Own Admission,  is going to POUNDED into electoral oblivion.  And underneath the sad and pathetic delusions, you know it.

          2. Despite the car wreck of an economy Bush II handed the President, we have seen more private sector job growth in less than four years than we saw under eight full years of Bush II.

  3. King need not be concerned about instilling an aura of mystery concerning his political positions and flawed ideology to Mainers. An unproductive and dilatory tour at the Blaine House, lavish payoffs from the Federal government to underwrite his Quixote quests, and the rapacious destruction of Maine’s wilderness are all too familiar themes to those who have eyes to see.  Like his ebony inamorata in Washington, King will pursue an agenda of moral decline and uncontrolled spending, ignoring the wishes of hard-working Mainers while ushering our children and grandchildren into an age of government excess that resigns them to a common existence. This mildewed megalomaniac of average intellect will unlikely go away in the near future; however, he should be reminded frequently!  and often! that a failed legacy cannot be easily obfuscated.

    1. You sound exactly like one of Karl Rove handlers who are paid to lie, take medication and you will feel better soon.

    2. We ain’t buying that load of Bovine Fodder!

      ” Spending Sprees” are  the other side of the  equation that Republican’s use to destroy the Government!

      Tax Pledges are their favorite!

      Republicans Spend like crazy in their quest for world domination at the expense of the Taxpayer!

    3. Summers is a LeBUFFOON stooge, toadie, and LIAR.  He LIED about “voter fraud” that doesn’t exist and tried to suppress voters.  But I guess that didn’t turn out so well for him in the peoples’ veto, did it?  He is one of the two BUFFOONISH “Charlies”, that other being the goofball Webster.  We will not forget “The Two Corrupt Charlies,” and King is miles beyond anything your LeBUFFOON toadie has to offer.  You have stated nothing but hyperbolic TeaPublican lies.  Glad to hear you are concerned about fiscal responsibility.  Maybe you should show it by telling your TeaPublican corporate toadie pawns to stop smooching the toenails of your corporate masters who give our money to the oil companies, help your corrupt buddies like MittTwit RobMe hide their money in the Caymans and Swiss banks, and dance for joy every time they ship another job to China.  TeaPublican corporate toadies are the worst and most corrupt liars and unpatriotic unchristian hypocrites every known to walk this planet.

      1. Sounds like MittTwit RobMe and King Angus have a lot in common. Yeah, you make them sound exactly the same. Thanks for reminding me NOT to vote for the King!

      2. Don’t you ever get tired of listening to yourself butcher the english language and beat up the right wing? It doesn’t matter who is in office or running for office. If they have an “R” after their name, you will beat them up to a pulp and call them names that haven’t even been invented yet. You are just a very angry liberal that didn’t get his way in ’10. Fortunately for you, things will probably sway to the left again this fall and you’ll get your little Commie friends back in the House and Senate. Fortunately I’m 3 years to my retirement and I’ll be able to book it down to  N.H. and dwell there until the Libs screw that state into the ground too.

    4.   You were clearly never taught to “eschew obfuscation.”  Consider two of the greatest speakers of the English language, Lincoln and Churchill.  Neither saw a speech or an essay as an opportunity to display the breadth of their vocabulary, but as a chance to communicate with their listeners or readers.
        Put your own insecurity aside and learn to write crisply and clearly.
        As to the substance of your analysis: it is conclusory, not analytical.  Don’t tell your readers what to think; convince them.
        Finally, your reference to an “ebony inamorata” shows that your pomposity is exceeded only by your racism.  Given the President’s gender, the correct noun is inamorato. 

      1. So, what sort of a grade do you give him (presumed him)?  B+ for creative writing but points off for being ineffectual and less than effective communicator?

    5. Erudite, a welcome contrast to much of the venom spewed on these lists but probably just a unfair as the carpet bagging attack ads from the USCC.

    6.  Quequeeg,

      Except for your reference to Obama as King’s “Ebony inamorata”, a phrase I have noticed you use at every opportunity, I agree with every single word and thought and point in your very well written, very clear post.

      (Here. for our other readers, is the official definition of Inamorata:

      in·am·o·ra·ta
       “[ in àmmə rtə ]   
      lover or beloved woman: a woman whom somebody loves or with whom somebody has a romantic relationship”

       I really don’t get your attachment to this phrase in describing King’s relationship with the President…except that it suggests your leanings are to the far right.)

      Interesting though that those on the left and those on the right see King the same way overall as they really take a close look at who he is..pure plutocrat, not very deep, not very consistent, not a good leader.

      As more and more left and right take a hard look at King, especially democrats foolishly continuing to support him even though DEMS are 79% assured of holding an even stronger senate majority, King’s share will decline.

      The more  Summers actually says or the more is actually said about Summers and who he is the more I see his share of the pie finishing as well and I see most of it drifting to the largest undecided block ever right up to the finish line.  

      I think as much as 20% will refuse to vote for any of the three principal candidates and my hunch is the winner  will have only 27%- of the vote.

      And what will that mean for Maine about whoever we send to Washington?

      Why don’t we just draw straws and get it over with.

      1. King’s use of “independance” has always seemed to me to be a marketing tool. A rich man’s end run around the Democratic primary.. His views are no different that many so called Blue Dog democrats. He should still be thanking Jonathan Carter for siphoning off Brennan votes in 1994.

      2. Thank you for the kind response. While Mr. Chenard is correct about gender, the use of  inamorata  was deliberate to emphasize an unhealthy form of adulation that  borders on insanity and blind acceptance of a weak and ineffectual man-child… to the point that some in the media (Chris Matthews, notably) have been aroused with tingling sensations.

        1.   The use of the word “ebony” is an unhealthy form of racism.  We are all out of Africa; our ancestors simply left in different millenia.  It is stunning that you would use the phrase “man-child” to describe the President: it smacks of the early 20th century habit of calling a black man “boy.”  
            The President has the intellect to have made the Law Review at the best law school in America, the political skill to have achieved Truman’s dream of a near-universal health insurance program, the wisdom to undo 30 years of Wall Street deregulation, and the cool command to have ended one of Bush’s wars, begin the end of another of Bush’s wars, and brought Bin Laden and scores of others to justice.
            Get over your sense of inferiority and accept that President Obama is a far, far better man than you.
            

          1. Regrettably Chenard, like most of his/her ilk, has to resort to ad hominem attacks when there is no substance to proffer in rebuttal. Obama’s introduction at the Law Review, like other social and politically motivated events in his life, were mandated through Affirmative Action and not to intellectual or experiential  substance. If you would do yourself the favor of reviewing any one of the  “seminal” posts credited to Obama – which for some strange reason are as sparse as hen’s teeth, you would find a decided absence of intellectual depth. But then calling someone a racist seems to have been an effective ploy for years when liberals find that their milking stool is precariously poised to tumble over because it’s legs are hollow and the milk maid has gone mad.

  4. Sooner or later one of them might consider speaking in depth from the intellect and heart about issues. Something tells me it’ll be the one who fears his or her own abilities the least.

    Forget the polls! Mainers, they’re on their knees begging…..what do you want?  Speak up now!

  5. Does anyone remember the Voter ID fiasco that Charlie Summers brought upon us?  Remember the massive voter “fraud” that ran rampart throughout the state?  Turned out to whimper than a roar.  This concocted fear came from an out-of-state, agenda driven political action committee seeking to disenfranchise voters – especially traditional democratic voters.  Charlie showed his leadership skills by bowing down and sucking up to the outside interest groups, and having Mainers go to the polls to quash this short-sighted directive.

  6. The King
    should be called Houdini. The illusion of “independence” is definitely a great
    escape from reality. It doesn’t really matter, which is very sad. Folks vote
    for the image, not the record & reality. Yeah, we get what we deserve. I
    really don’t understand why people feel so passionate in their support for a
    charlatan.  Angus King cares NOTHING
    about anyone but himself yet thousands of sheep identify w/this guy.  You make the bed that the rest of us have to
    sleep in.  Thanks Bedbugs.

  7.                                                                            VOTE KING

  8. You can’t put enough lipstick on Anguish to distinguish him from any other porcine slopper at the trough, and poor Cindy uses too much and gets it on crooked.

    It’s Summers for me, all the way.

  9. Dill is real……she entered BEFORE the opportunists decided to run….AFTER Snowe pulled out………….she has more conviction, passion, and the best skill set for Washington than the two guys….in my opinion…….How many times has Summer’s run? The King has no clothes……”….
    DEMOCRAT ERSKINE BOWLES CALLED RYAN BUDGET ‘SENSIBLE, STRAIGHTFORWARD, SERIOUS’….

  10. Due the the repugnant Republican national platform, due to the Republicans selecting Ryan as VP candidate and due to the fact that those running as Republicans are something other than Republicans, the opposition could run the Gerber baby and win. Other down ballot races will prove to have similar disastrous outcomes. The Republicans are going to be getting a proverbial trip to the woodshed.

  11. RE ”  ‘King needs to “make a forceful, compelling argument to elect him in the face of this money coming in from outside,’  Cuzzi  said.”

    Yes. He would have us believe he would be a significant force for ending the Senate’s dysfunction without providing specifics as to why this would be so.

    What makes him believe his persona would be  a significant factor in breaking the log jam?

    Which senators does he believe he would be able to persuade to become less partisan?

    That the senators he would be working with to make the Senate less partisan  would be Democrats and Republicans, what  necessitates his running  as an Independent rather than as a D or R?   (Whether D or R or I, a senator is free to vote his conscience. ) 

  12. I’ve seen lots of (GOP SuperPac) ads for Dill and King – but Old Charlie Summers seems to be MIA.

    Why is Charlie hiding from the voters?

    Is he scared?

    I think so.

    Yessah

Leave a comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *