Shoemakers from Maine joined members of the state’s congressional delegation Wednesday on Capitol Hill to argue against dropping tariffs through a proposed trade agreement, charging that eliminating existing tariffs would hurt American manufacturers.

Negotiations continue regarding the Trans-Pacific Partnership, a free trade agreement that includes Australia, Brunei, Chile, Malaysia, New Zealand, Peru, Singapore, Vietnam and the United States.

According to a recent release from the Office of the U.S. Trade Representative, the Obama administration views the partnership as a way “to support jobs for American workers by boosting American exports to the dynamic Asia-Pacific region, promote manufacturing, innovation, and entrepreneurship, and at the same time, reflect in the agreement important values on key issues such as worker rights and the environment.”

Workers from Boston-based New Balance’s plant in Norridgewock, Maine, joined with Republican Sen. Susan Collins, Democratic U.S. Rep. Mike Michaud and others to argue against dropping tariffs. According to the company, New Balance is the only athletic shoe firm that makes footwear in the United States. It has five factories in New England, including three in Maine in Norridgewock, Norway and Skowhegan, where they employ roughly 870 people.

“Trying to put faces to jobs is what we were trying to do,” said Raye Wentworth, plant manager at the Norridgewock facility, who has worked for New Balance for 29 years and was in Washington, D.C., with a number of her fellow workers Wednesday. “I feel we were successful. I think we got to some really good representatives that heard our story. I felt supported, I felt like they understood.

“It’s not just about the jobs, it’s about the communities, how devastating it would be if we ever were to have to close our doors.”

Michaud said he learned Wednesday during a meeting he set up between New Balance officials and U.S. Trade Representative Ron Kirk that Kirk will be visiting one of the Maine factories this fall.

“I’m pleased that Ambassador Kirk accepted my invitation to tour a Maine New Balance facility,” said Michaud. “It will be extremely valuable for him to see firsthand how important these jobs are to not only our workers but also to our state. I really appreciate him taking the time to come up to Maine. It’s critical that we make sure this new trade agreement doesn’t disadvantage our domestic manufacturers and threaten the thousands of jobs they support.”

According to a release from Michaud’s office, through free trade agreements, tariffs normally are phased out. If that happens, the release asserted, “Vietnam’s currency manipulation, state-owned enterprises, and low labor and environmental standards will give its footwear factories a significant and unfair advantage over American producers like New Balance.”

Michaud said Wednesday that even with tariffs in place, Vietnam’s footwear sector has managed to grow to the second largest exporter of shoes to the U.S., second behind only China, according to a transcript of his remarks.

“These tariffs not only level the playing field, but they keep the doors to New Balance’s factories open. They make it possible for all 4,000 American workers in the U.S. footwear sector to keep their jobs,” he said. “In addition, and a point not to be overlooked during the conversations about reducing the deficit, these tariffs raised $19 billion in revenues over 10 years.

“I delivered this message directly to the President when I handed him a pair of personalized, hand-crafted New Balances made at their Norridgewock facility.”

Collins noted that Maine has a long shoemaking history, once one of the largest industries in Maine with more than 30,000 workers. Today, she said, there’s about 900 total shoemaking jobs in Maine.

“Domestic rubber footwear manufacturers depend on the long-standing duties that are levied on certain imported footwear products to continue to manufacture and produce high-quality, American made footwear,” Collins said, according to a transcript of her remarks. “I am extremely concerned that a Trans-Pacific free trade agreement that does not recognize the importance of these duties to the domestic industry could put U.S. manufacturers at an overwhelming disadvantage compared to their competitors who have opted not to manufacture in the U.S., and as a result, could force the remaining domestic production overseas.”

Raye said she told officials that Maine has seen factories closing down in recent decades to move overseas. The country is losing the craftsmanship it needs to succeed, she said.

New Balance in Maine is growing, she noted, having added 70 jobs at her facility in Norridgewock recently. Part of the reason for growth is increased efficiency, she said. It used to take eight days to make a pair of shoes, she said. Now it takes them three hours.

“We’re not just lucky that we’re here today and that we are staying competitive. It’s because of our associates and their commitment to domestic manufacturing, to continue to make us better,” she told the Bangor Daily News.

Collins referenced the recent controversy surrounding the sourcing of the U.S. Olympic uniforms, which were made in China.

“To all those people who care about the ‘Made in the U.S.A.’ label, I would say this is your opportunity to support American workers and ensure the survival of a domestic footwear manufacturing industry,” she said.

U.S. Sen. Olympia J. Snowe, R-Maine, didn’t attend the conference but met with company officials later on Wednesday. She said in a release that New Balance has been a cornerstone of Maine and New England’s manufacturing base.

“When other companies were relocating jobs overseas, New Balance hired more Americans to produce high quality, Made-in-the-USA lines,” Snowe said. “Just as Maine’s footwear manufacturing workers have redoubled their efforts to compete with an ever-increasing number of foreign imports, so too have I worked — and will continue to work — to defend these jobs from the type of across-the-board tariff reductions that could open the floodgates to subsidized imports.”

Join the Conversation

25 Comments

  1. Obama says he is against shipping jobs overseas, now is the time to prove it! Lets see if he is just all talk!

    1. but this is capitalism.  This is the free enterprise system at work. This is how it supposed to work. People say he is a social capitalistic hating person. Then get pissed that he does something like this because American Jobs might leave the state. 

  2. Why should the rest of us be forced to pay to ” ensure the survival of a domestic footwear manufacturing industry”?  US manufacturers need to compete, not be artificially propped up at our expense. 

    1. A pair of NBs don’t cost any more than the Chinese Nike and I think they are better quality.

      1. Actually, the NB Minimus 0’s are more expensive then and comparable to what used to be NIKE’s waffle before NIKE inserted arch support. The new NIKE waffles definitely lost quality too. So it’s worth the extra $50 to go NB for the quality.

        1. Because state-owned enterprises in COMMUNIST Vietnam and COMMUNIST China can flood our market with cheap product made with slave labor and choke out our own products. That’s why.

  3. Time to get out and buy NB before they go. This is something that Obama will let go over seas because he doesn’t care about US. Just undermining the American people and lining his pocket. Don’t believe me. Just ask him for a stamped copy of his birth cert. I can’t even get back across the border without me, and this guy Barry (maybe) gets elected Pres. What a joke. He isn’t even smart enough to watch the kiss cam.

    1. Don’t tell me you and D. Trump are still stuck on the president being born out of the country?
      Here is a bulletin for you Hawaii is in the United States. 

      1. Are you sure? Has his birth cert. Has you ever looked at it or anyone else for that matter.

        1. If you want to waste your time questioning the Presidents birth place go to it.  You may want to check with Trump as he sent many people over to Hawaii, the people should be getting back to him soon as it must be close to a year since he sent them.
          What a joke.

  4. Obama is going to have to support the tariff unless he wants to see the Country go thru another NAFTA mess, which is what a lessening of tariff’s is clearly going to do. Maine has already, courtesy of Willie and Gore, lost Dexter and Hathaway. NB’s 900 folk’s are hanging on in Maine by not a lot and with the now clearly seen currency manipulation of China that is actually forcing companies to come back to the US, it’s time to keep the pressure on, and support American business and job’s, Republican as that sounds. The newest currency manipulator, Vietnam, is looking to use their lax, to the point of non-existent, labor and environmental standard’s to copy the Chinese model for as long as they can. But even they are going to run into the ‘China issue’ eventually.

    In the mean time, here in the US, the fact that so many company’s are coming back here after they have been ‘burned’ by overseas condition’s should be seen as huge vindication by these American community’s, that have been staying the course and maintaining their community’s business effort’s, by investing, maintaining and expanding their local utility’s and roadway’s. With the economy slowly coming back, and we are all keeping a close eye on it’s recovery, this business effort needs to be supported, and where possible, expanded. NB is the first of what is hoped to be many business’s that come home to Maine. This is not the time for Washington to go ‘Corporate’ and let badly needed business, and employment, get away from us simply because we, as a Country, are playing by the same business rules that everyone else is supposed to be, but is being abused because they feel they ‘can get away with it’ because we don’t want to be seen as a ‘bully’. Had Washington been more serious, and a lot less short term profit-oritented, Maine would’ve been a lot better off. Now is the time for the entire Maine Congressional Delegation to tell Obama ‘No releasing of the tariff’s’. Their effectiveness on this is gonna go along way in the upcoming election’s.

    1. I don’t believe the President has the stones to challenge China.  I base this on the lack any constructive dialog or progress in the last 3.5 years.
      If the tariff saves jobs wouldn’t logic extend that more tariffs will save more jobs?  You may save NB jobs but when there is a retailation by China establishing a counter tariff, we’ll just lose jobs elsewhere.  Tariffs are the wrong solution to saving American jobs.  

      1. The tariff issue is one that is in a Chinese-checker’s type (pardon the pun) environment. Will a tariff on Chinese shoes result in a Chinese tariff on some of our product’s elsewhere that go into China ? No doubt it will. But that’s what’s part of this whole issue, the opening of free trade (Yes I said FREE TRADE ) market’s and letting everyone compete, on equal term’s. The Chinese and other’s don’t simply because their labor market’s are State-controlled as far as wage’s, working condition’s and, in the Chinese’s case their infamous 1 Child Only Policy, family interest’s (for lack of a better term). Add to this is the fact that these same Government’s subsidize (read as Gov’t supported ) their industries thru power supply term’s (the Chinese 3 Gorges Dam is the major Chinese subsidy here), State-supported transportation of raw material’s and then the same State-supported transportation of those same goods to US Port’s (anyone guess what that COSCO or OOCL logo is on all of those CONEX ship’s and container’s means ? ) for import is a massive cost benefit (State subsidy) to those State-supported business’s that our US business’s can’t even begin to cope with, much get in any meaningful way.  
         
        No, a tariff might not be nice. But it’s the only way that US Business’s can begin to assert themselves in the Global Marketplace thru legal, and clearly understandable, means. It’s something that the Chinese are slowly finding out for themselves. How long it takes depends on just how long the Chinese want to suffer thru this. Given their economy, and the rising level of economic discontent that is being seen more and more, it’s not gonna be too long before they have to settle for the inevitable. We know it, and so do the Chinese, and the Vietnamese if they’re smart enough to read the ‘tea leaf’s’. The only really unanswered question is when is their learning gonna catch-up with the sense of reality. Time and history are the only one’s that can answer that question…..

        1. It doesn’t allow for equal terms, if USA has OSHA and Chinese does not need to follow such rules, including chemicals used. For example the United States spent years getting rid of lead in products and then with free trade lead came back into the county. If they do not follow equal rules, or equal terms as you say, I do not think free trade helps our nation.

          As you also say, how long will it take for the other countries to level out? How long do we have to suffer through it too?

  5. New Balance are great footwear, I have been buying them for over 10 years and I always look for the “Made in America” logo.  NB does have footwear made out of the country.

  6. I would like to see an accounting of all of the “Free Trade” agreements and whether or not they have ever actually created jobs in America. We cannot make things cheaply enough for the folks in Vietnam and Myanmar to buy, but this will certainly result in more sweat-shops in these poor nations, resulting in a loss of American jobs. I am with the shoe workers – OUR shoe workers!

Leave a comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *