A Massachusetts physician was formally nominated to be the Green Party’s contender for the U.S. presidency Saturday afternoon at the downtown Baltimore Holiday Inn.

Jill Stein, who was the expected nominee, beat out actress Roseanne Barr handily. Stein amassed a majority of delegates’ votes just before 4 p.m. at the Greens’ annual national meeting, which opened Thursday at the University of Baltimore before moving near the Inner Harbor for Saturday’s presidential nominating convention.

It was the first national political convention in Baltimore since Democrats nominated Woodrow Wilson in 1912.

“We are the 99 percent, and this is the year we take our country back,” Stein said to the crowd gathered in a conference room off the hotel’s lobby. Organizers said Saturday that about 350 people registered to attend the national convention.

Stein garnered 193.5 votes from delegates, and Barr collected 72, according to preliminary tallies. There were 294 delegates present for the nominating convention, organizers said. One delegate split his or her vote between Stein and a minor entrant, they said.

“Voting for either Wall Street candidate gives a mandate for four more years of corporate rule,” Stein said in her nomination speech, lumping President Barack Obama and his opponent, former Massachusetts Gov. Mitt Romney, as candidates beholden to commercial interests.

Stein’s address outlined her Green New Deal, a policy plan with planks including forgiving student loan debt and placing a moratorium on foreclosures and evictions. The current two-party system is broken, said Stein: “That’s why I say I’m practicing political medicine because it’s the mother of illnesses.”

As Stein drew to a close, the crowd began cheering, “Let Jill debate.” The chant reflected the challenges the Greens face now that their candidate has been chosen.

Stein and her running mate, anti-poverty advocate Cheri Honkala, want to be recognized on ballots across the country and to be given the opportunity to face off against the mainstream competitors.

To get the Stein-Honkala ticket on ballots in Maryland, the Greens need to submit 3,000 signatures to the state elections board by Aug. 6, said Brian Bittner, chairman of the Baltimore City Green Party and lead local organizer for the convention.

About 4,000 people have already signed petitions, which the Greens intend to submit to the elections board next week, he said. If fewer than 3,000 of those are certified, there’s still time to gather more, he said.

“We’ve nominated a really great candidate for president,” Bittner said. And the convention went off without a hitch, he said: “Everybody had a really good time.”

Convention participants seemed prepared to return to their home states and fight for their candidates to be represented.

Tara B.P. Colon, a Honkala supporter from Philadelphia representing the Poor People’s Economic Human Rights Campaign, said she was determined to find a way to have Greens participate in debates with Obama and Romney.

“Whether they want us there or not,” Colon said. “Even if I personally have to break down the doors to get us in.”

Before Stein took the stage, Honkala told the crowd about her conversion from homeless mother to politician. Last year, she ran for sheriff of Philadelphia, promising she would not evict people from homes that had been foreclosed upon.

On the cold winter night she decided to occupy an abandoned, heated house to keep her son alive, Honkala told the crowd, “my hunger for justice was born.”

Join the Conversation

24 Comments

  1. Stein and Barr?? How can anybody take this seriously?
    Stein has been an embarrassment and irritant to Ma. for years, sticking her ultra liberal nose into every stupid issue.

      1. Considering the quality of what dominates prime time, that might not be so bad. She won’t gain much recognition from the sheeple, but she won’t be reduced to a clown act either.
        Even so, she ought be included in televised debates. To a growing number, her message based on Green Principles is a fresh breeze in the stagnant air of the usual two-party wind machine.

        1. For sure!  I would love to see the Greens run a smart, reasoned candidate that makes the other two look stupid.  Instead they again run a fringe candidate simply to speak some issues.

          1. Of course, any party seeking fundamental change is going to be on the margin of the politics as usual stage. As for being a fringe group, ther’s nothing wrong with that except for the fact that “fringe” is the short-cut version of “lunatic fringe,” effectively used by Teddy Roosevelt in dealing with opposition he didn’t want to bother with. To be truly mainstream, it would be just another corporate-financed front group for the power elite, perhaps with some democratic features thrown in for appearances. I understand perfectly well what you refer to, but what I heard Dr. Stein say in an interview with Amy Goodman yesterday leads me to believer her to be intelligent, reasoned, articulate and determined. She faces overwhelming odds to be sure, but the arguments need to be made out there on the airwaves where people can see and hear them expressed. It would be nice if the Greens had a stable of of polished, power speakers and personages, the sorts people identify with immediately (think of Obama at the 2004 Democratic convention, the event that catapulted his political fortunes) but that hasn’t been the nature of political insurgencies – “third” parties if you will- in our national history, except perhaps for a century ago when Teddy Roosevelt bolted the GOP and ran as the Progressive candidate for president. Socialist Eugene Debs gained national stature that same year by being persistent and by offering real reasons for questioning the major parties’ ability to fairly govern the country. But no challenges, no matter how rational, can or will be be taken seriously while the corporate power elites who underwrite our political pageants decide who will be heard and who will not. Blogs and the other vehicles – the occupy movement – are effective to a point, but they tend to preach to each other and lack any cohesion and central theme of the sort necessary to get the message out to the rank and file . The TV debates make that easier. The whole country gets to see all the choices at the same time and it makes a difference in building any sort of momentum. This, the two major parties understand full well, and they want nothing to do with it.

        2. “but she won’t be reduced to a clown act either.”
          You haven’t had to put up with her clown acts here in Mass. for years and years running half-##### campaigns in every race imaginable, actually getting quoted in the local papers on occasion (just for a good snicker) and getting involved with every strange cause du jour.   Just her wanting to forgive all the student loans out there shows how far off kilter she is. It sounds all warm and fuzzy, but how could it realistically be done?

      1. In other words, democracy is dead so lets all just roll over and be good serfs for the plutocrats.  

        No thanks Kev.  

          1. I am saying the green party is a viable party and their candidate, nominated and elected through the democratic process, should be allowed to go head to head with the anointed ones.  

          2. There is a huge amount of discontent with the politicians in this country.  We are approaching critical mass and anything can happen.  The idea of a Green president is more appealing than many other options.  

            The debate commission, another name for the Demoblican/republocrat party has deliberately set the bar for participation too high for anyone to achieve.  They are doing all Americans, except the few who own us, a huge disservice by continuing their charade.  

          3. The truth is that they will not and cannot win. Just as I told the Ron Paul people many months ago he would not win I’m telling you right now, even if they are allowed to debate, they will not win.

          4. They cannot win and cannot even inject fresh ideas into the dialogue if we allow the ruling party total dominance.  The system is a sham and you want to roll over and play dead!?!?!  

            My grandchildren thank you…….for nothing.  

          5. “…green party is not the answer.”

            So, Kevin, the answer is…?

            If kept from the debate, one can never win, that is almost guaranteed.

            Why not multiple questions, and solutions?

            There are are often more than two sides to an issue.

            And with the Demmicans and Republicrats it is arguable that they even ARE two sides, just two shades.

  2. I could see (maybe) the relevance of this story if a local person had been quoted or a story on the Maine delegation, this however is irrelevant to Maine. 

    1. Members of the Maine Green Independent Party would probably take issue with that assumption. It’s difficult for some, I know, but there are happenings outside the State of Maine that might hold interest for readers here. I think there are Mainers at the Green Party’s national convention, just as there will be at the GOP and Democratic national conventions later on, even though many, perhaps most Maine voters don’t belong to either of those parties.

      1.  The vast majority of Mainers really don’t care. Maybe with a local angle but otherwise its like the New York Times covering 5 people with signs hanging out in the rain at the Federal building in Bangor. No relevance.

      2. Maine doesn’t have a green party. I believe the democrtic party runs on their platform along with other issues. It’s hard to be everything to everyone, yet the Dems have pulled it off as greens, and took the 5% that was needed for the green to maintain a party in Maine.

Leave a comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *