“Corporations are people” Mitt Romney is often quoted, arguing that what is good for corporations is good for people. But this is a backwards way of looking at the truth; it’s not the cart that pushes the horse. If corporations are made of people, then what is good for people is good for corporations.

There is always talk that Maine is not business-friendly. But if we really want to attract business, the question we should be asking is, “How can we be more family-friendly?” How can we improve the quality of life here in Maine so this is the place where people want to continue to live and raise their families?

I met Paul at a Birth Roots parenting class, a new father, like me, of a beautiful baby girl. Paul works for a company with affiliates in Chicago and Portland and he told me he chooses to live in Maine even though it means he makes 20 percent less than his peers in Chicago.

Paul isn’t the only one making this choice. People always are moving to Maine from big cities such as New York because they want a different way of life and they bring their business and their clients with them.

There is something about living in Maine that transcends pure economic rationale, something about the beauty and the community that nourishes the soul. In Maine, you feel you can live better even with less money. But Maine didn’t just happen this way by accident, it took us communally investing in our future and valuing what is truly priceless.

So what can we do to make Maine the most family-friendly state? Cutting Head Start, as the Maine State Legislature just did, is the exact opposite of what we want to do. Research continuously has shown that early childhood education is the best investment we can make. A study in California’s San Bernardino County showed society receives nearly $9 in benefits for every $1 invested in Head Start children. These benefits include increased earnings, employment, family stability, decreased welfare dependency, crime costs, grade repetition and special education.

Failure to support early childhood education is catastrophic for our country and our children. The argument that by spending this money now we are mortgaging our children’s future simply cannot be made. If we don’t make this investment now there may be no family home to mortgage.

The Maine State Chamber of Commerce needs to back the reinstitution of full funding to Head Start. In fact, they need to advocate increased funding. These children are the innovators and business owners of the future.

If we want Maine and America to stay in business, investing in our children and our families is the only way to remain globally competitive. The bumper sticker says: “Maine, the way life should be.” Let’s try to keep it that way.

Please contact members of your local Chamber of Commerce and tell them to use their lobbyists in Augusta so putting families first is Maine’s first order of business.

Orion Breen is a member of Our Exchange Portland.

Join the Conversation

21 Comments

  1. At what point in time are parents going to take responsibility for their children? I know they used to. There was a time when people arranged for the care of their young children on their own and paid the costs.

    IMO, if Head Start was living up to it’s mantra, there would be virtually no children going through the school system that were considered functionally illiterate. They would be blowing away children from other industrial nations with their math and language skills. I have come to the conclusion that all Head Sart and Pre School programs are is tax payer funded baby sitting services.

    1. Exactly right. In fact there are any number of other programs that fall so short of their intended goal you wonder how they could have justified their existence for decades.

      1.  The number one goal of every government program is to grow and consume ever more resources. 

    2. You’re quite right, and I’ll bet that the “child care” element is not a trivial part of its support.  When I went through the UMO Ed program, the researched show that the advantages of Head Start ended by fifth grade.  I’ve heard it’s closer to third grade now…not sure if that says more about the education system or Head Start.

      Head Start “feels” like the right thing to do, and maybe some of the intangibles are valuable.  It’s worth an honest discussion. 

    3. “At what point in time are parents going to take responsibility for their children?”

      Excellent point … except for one thing.  Lamenting that we don’t live in a Utopian society will not make it utopian.  Not recognizing the reality of society as it is today will not improve the society of tomorrow, nor will it help the debt that our children face.  Sometimes we do need to spend that money in order to avoid an even greater expense in the future.  In my opinion it’s one thing to say an adult should be responsible for themselves (and their children) but it’s another thing entirely to punish the children when the adults fail.  Doing that makes us just as responsible as the parent.

      1. Which utopia are you interested in? As it stands now the children that are comming up in this ‘Utopia’ are being taught that they and their parents aren’t responsible for their feeding and care. They are taught that they will never have to feel the slightest pain.
        They are being taught that they need medication just to get through school.
        They are being taught that they have no responsibilty to learn in school, why make the effort when you will go to the next grade anyway.
        They are being taught that when they get out of HS they can apply for Disability because they have a long diagnosis of ADD, ADHD, etc. etc.
        They are learning very well the ins and outs of working the system.

        They aren’t being taught self reliance, personal responsability, pride in themselves and their accomplishments.

        There was a time, not too many years ago when children knew that if they didn’t do the work required to advance through to the next grade level, they were going to repeat their current grade. There were no ifs ands or buts about it. Guess what? Not very many flunked. That was back in the day when the USA school system was the envy of the world. If the news and advertisements on TV are to believed we have fallen to 17th. Do you feel comfortable with this ‘Utopia’?

        BTW, at that time there was no Head Start/Pre-school.

      2. Dropping a government program that provides no benefit other than as a baby sitting services does not punish anyone.  Continuing to fund it makes us irresponsible adults.

  2. I really must comment. After teaching in the classroom for 26 yrs, Head Start, in my opinion, is a waste of tax payers money. Why? It is mainly a babysitting service. Yes, education is introduced, but to little avail. Children come into school, ready to learn, based on their family dynamics, period. None of these social programs has enhanced students ability to learn. In a tough economic time, Head Start should be one of the first to go.

  3. LOL.

    How long before the BDN just adds an extra section titled “Head Start?”

    The preposterous claims of the extraordinary benefits of Head Start and the catastrophic effects of ending the glorified babysitting service have been debunked by the Obama administration’s own HHS.  Let it die the natural death it deserves.

  4. So while Republicans and some Democrats are focused on the rights and profits of the wealthy and at the Federal level spending more and more on Defense, the rest of the world is investing in themselves. They’re spending their money on education, infrastructure and research.

    But yeah, let’s cut head start so we can give more guys like Poliquin tree tax credits or whatever. “Open for Business!” What a joke.

      1. There are several countries that spend more on education and many more that spend similar rates. As for infrastructure, China and India for example spend 5 times as much as we do. We need to make cuts, but our priorities aren’t straight. It’s about proportion and these kinds of cuts aren’t proportional. Penny wise, pound foolish for sure.

        1.  And the quality of life for the average person in China and India is better or worse then the US?

          1. And their current increases in spending would impact their pasts how? Their current spending would have immediate impact how?

        2.  I think it is more about perception than proportion. When India builds a superhighway in 2010 and we built the same in 1960…. are we falling behind or are they catching up?

          1. It’s both. Given the age of our infrastructure, population shifts, new technologies and needs — why are we waiting for them to catch up? We should be the ones driving things forward and we’re not.

            I’m not saying we ought to throw money at our problems, but starving them is no where near a viable solution.

    1.  They also have expectations for their children, we have none.  Unless maybe a sports career which seems to be all that we are interested in any more – sports!

      1. So what’s the solution to that? Underfund our education programs? Institute more standardized tests?

  5. Mr. Breen, you are very articulate and compassionate. Thank you for taking the time to write this most compelling argument for Head Start. I remember the sheriff of Washington County, I think it was, making a plea to keep head start in the BDN. His view was that it keeps crime down.

    1. From the Brookings Institute (liberal think tank) report.
      The study demonstrated that children’s attendance in Head Start has
      no demonstrable impact on their academic, socio-emotional, or health
      status at the end of first grade. That’s right. If you were a mother who
      lost the lottery, couldn’t get your child into Head Start, and had to
      care for her at home, she was no worse off at the end of first grade
      than she would have been had she gotten into Head Start. That isn’t to
      say that she was well off. In the critical area of vocabulary,
      3-year-olds entered the study at the 29th percentile in terms of
      national norms and finished first grade at the 24th percentile whether
      or not they attended Head Start. That is not good.

      In other words its all about the home…. and there is nothing HeadStart can do about that.

Leave a comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *