PORTLAND, Maine — Tricia Clark will keep her fingers crossed when the Legislature reconvenes this week and takes up a budget plan that calls for sharp cuts in Medicaid and health care spending.

Clark, 19, stands to lose out when the Legislature votes on a plan to slash spending on Medicaid and a slew of other programs ranging from mental health assistance and school grants to dental care, drug abuse treatment and prescription drugs.

Clark is one of nearly 7,000 young adults who will lose Medicaid coverage if the Legislature approves a proposal to eliminate 19- and 20-year-olds from the state’s Medicaid program, which goes by the name MaineCare in Maine.

That’s a tough pill to swallow for Clark, who lives in a studio apartment in Portland, makes a low wage as a kitchen assistant and dishwasher and is still getting on her feet after being homeless for six months last year.

Without Medicaid coverage, she’ll have to cover the costs for her primary care physician and therapist, which she says she can’t afford.

“What’s shocking to me is that medical coverage seems like a bare essential — and I can’t believe they’re taking that away,” she said.

In his effort to cut state spending, Gov. Paul LePage proposed revamping the state’s Medicaid program and eliminating other services and programs administered by the Department of Health and Human Services. Medicaid is a federal program administered by the states that serves as the country’s primary health insurance program for low-income Americans.

Supporters of the cuts say that welfare spending is unsustainable and that Maine provides Medicaid coverage to 35 percent more of the population that the national average. The latest proposed cuts, which must be approved by the full Legislature, will help close an $83 million budget shortfall at the health department.

Last month, the Legislature approved a first round of sharp Medicaid cuts.

Lawmakers froze enrollment in Medicaid for childless adults, meaning that none of the 14,000 or so who now receive benefits will be denied, but that no new enrollees will be allowed. (There’s a waiting list of more than 18,000 for the program.) Legislators also eliminated coverage for parents with incomes between 133 percent and 200 percent of the federal poverty level, casting nearly 12,000 people off coverage.

This week, the Legislature is taking up a budget with additional proposals that, if approved, will cut more people off Medicaid and other health care programs.

Those proposals include eliminating Medicaid coverage for parents with incomes between 100 and 133 percent of the poverty level, as well low-income 19- and 20-year-olds.

LePage’s original proposal also eliminated prescription drug coverage for the elderly and disabled by doing away with the Medicare Saving Program and the Drugs for the Elderly program. The Legislature’s Appropriations Committee, though, approved a plan last week that merely cuts those programs rather than eliminating them altogether.

Other proposals on the table include reducing funding for the state’s Head Start programs; eliminating or reducing funding for dental, vision, chiropractic, occupational therapy, smoking cessation and physical therapy services; and reducing or eliminating Fund for a Healthy Maine programs, which receive Maine’s annual tobacco settlement payments and distribute them for school grants, child care, dental, immunization and other programs.

Opponents of the cuts say not only do the proposals hurt the neediest and most vulnerable residents, but they’re also illegal under federal Medicaid rules.

Rep. Mark Eves, the ranking Democrat on the Health and Human Services Committee, said it’s “completely irresponsible” to move forward with some of the proposals knowing that the Secretary of Health and Human Services Kathleen Sebelius will deny many the cuts. He also doesn’t think Mainers have much of a stomach for taking prescription drugs away from the elderly and the poor.

“I think people inherently understand and sympathize with the need for seniors with disabilities to continue taking their medication,” Eves said.

But supporters of the cuts say tough times call for tough measures. The state will be asking for waivers from the federal government for some of the proposal, said Stefanie Nadeau, the head of MaineCare Services.

In the meantime, Tricia Clark isn’t the only one hoping the Legislature doesn’t approve all the cuts.

Jean Greenleaf, 73, of Winthrop, originally stood to lose funding for the drugs she takes for diabetes, cholesterol, a stomach disorder and depression under LePage’s original budget proposal. It appears her prescription drug coverage will be saved under the Appropriations Committee’s compromise, but she’s likely to lose coverage for hospital visits, which would expose her to more than $1,200 in payments that are now covered.

That’s a lot of money for Greenleaf, a widow who brings in $1,175 a month in Social Security and another $150 to $200 a month from office cleaning jobs. There’s little money left over after she pays $400 a month on the mortgage of her Winthrop home, electricity, phone, food and, in the cold-weather months, oil for heat.

“I think it’s kind of cruel to do this to the elderly, especially those who can’t work,” said Greenleaf. “I’ve been worried to death about my pills. And there are a lot of people a lot worse off than I am.”

Join the Conversation

28 Comments

  1.   Republicans like the Sadist Paul Lepage have been busy selling America out to their crooked pals on Wall St.
     Money to help Canada’s communist potato farmers? YES! Money to help Maine’s elderly? NO! Money to help Quebec power ship electricity they stole from the Cree nation ? YES! Money to help Maine’s  mentally disabled? NO!Money to help Canadian gas companies ship stolen natural gas to South African billionaires? YES! Money to  help Maine people buy affordable heath insurance? NO!

  2. Cutting poeple out of health care completely is a shortsighted solution.  People need health care and it helps society to be more secure.  It is better to have a doctor help people than not to help them.

    I suggest that the shortfall be met by reducing the reimbursements to the service providers.  Doctors would have to decide who they should see based on their values.  I think the health profession gets far too much money, Particularly doctors and administrators.  Their fees are sometimes prohibitive to treatment. 

     Dock the doctors.

    1. Administrators – definitely.  Doctors?  Medical school and malpractice insurance to keep the ambulance chasers at bay – definitely NOT.   Having patients demanding the best of care and not be willing to pay for it will only lead to a dearth of qualified doctors, or doctors from overseas.  That’s happening already.

      Mainecare already owes millions to providers and hospitals from years ago.  They just decide when and what they’re going to pay.

      If you or I called the Bangor Hydro and said: “Gee, I know my bill is $200.00, but I feel that your electricity service is only worth $125, so that’s all I’m going to pay you, and since my revenue has not matched projections for this month, I’m hoping to be able to send a check for at least a partial payment next month.  Oh, and if you so much as forget to add “Jr.” to my name, I’m going to refuse to pay you AT ALL because you didn’t do your due dilligence to make sure the bill was correct.  Your loss.  You should have done better at billing.”  how long do you suppose it would be before we were sitting in the dark? 

      I’m not at all being facetious about that.  Insurance companies and the state will go to extraordinary lengths to NOT pay for services rendered.  And as an aside, a large majority of MaineCare recipients are dishwashers in restaurants or serve the public in some other capacity.

      It’s amazing really what they are allowed to get away with.

  3. How many people in the above-mentioned catagories have high cable TV bills or expensive cell phone packages? 

      1. Some Medical Centers,  Hospitals, Drs., and Dentist  have sliding scale fees for people who are low income with no insurance.  Perhaps this would help some that may loose their coverage.

      2. Bravo – I had been trying to figure out just what to say and you did a great job.  Would the ones complaining like us to check out just what they have?

  4. Again LePage continues his war on the poor. He said he woud create jobs, yet didn’t tell us they would be jobs for his family. Hanging up an ” Open for Business” sign is a joke. This story states that Maine pays 35% more than other states for medical care to its residents. Maybe something beside hanging a sign needs to be done to create and retain jobs in the state. High taxes, useless inspections of cars, ridiculous registration fee’s, no wonder business don’t move here.

  5. I tell ya what……impeach the man! Get him out of the Blaine house ASAP! Some of the people of Maine thought that he as a good choice for Governor. Well hind sight is 20/20. The Oppressors in Augusta cannot do this.  They are taking things away from us without OUR permission.  That is theft. Plain and simple. Why do we have to pay for others mistakes? Augusta screwed up by giving out benefits to people who were ineligible. Well LePage….I think it’s high time your “people” pay for that mistake. It’s not the Maine peoples fault. Take responsibility for YOUR actions and leave us alone! Many of us will actually literally die if this is legislation is passed. If that happens can u live with being labeled a killer of elderly, disabled, poor, women, and children? How can u sleep at night?

    1. I don’t think the death or destruction of the poor and elderly bother him one bit. We can make him completely powerless by voting straight Democrat in November. Then they can undo some of this clown’s damage.

  6. Let’s see now.  We sent most of the good manufacturing jobs out of State…check.  we changed the health insurance rules so the average person can’t afford it….check.  Not, if we can cut any assistance for their prescriptions, maybe some will go without and die so we won’t have to put so many in the trucks to haul out of State.  The Dogs are in the Kitchen!  Maybe Nazi labor camps are next step. Hitler used the same tactics to blame all the problems on someone else.

  7. Maine has one of the oldest populations in the entire United States of America. Most of the current crop of elderly Mainers are people who have worked hard their entire lives. During their working years they may not have made a lot of money, but for the most part they paid their taxes, put a roof over their family’s head, put food on the table and raised their children without being a burden on the State. During their working years they may not have made a lot of money, but they did the jobs that needed to be done. They worked on farms, they fished, they did manual labor. . They never made enough money during their working years to have retirement funds and the type of work they did did not come with a pension. Now they are existing on Social Security which might and the keyword there is might give them enough to live on, in too many cases just barely enough.   Old people, unfortunately, get sick and when they do get sick they become very expensive to keep alive. Over the years Mainers have voted into office people who were concerned about their fellow Mainers. They passed laws that helped old people in their final years of life. In 2010 a new breed of legislator came on the scene, Tea Party Republicans. These tea party Republicans decided that it was more important to give tax breaks to the wealthy and to pay for these tax breaks on the backs of the poor, the sick and the disabled and yes the elderly. The sitting Governor declared war on Maine’s most vulnerable Citizens and with the help of his tea party republicans currently in control in Augusta has made that war the primary focus of his administration. To hear The Governor of The State of Maine tell it all of Maine’s problems could be solved if we  just didn’t have all of these poor, disabled, sick and old people around. He has proposed time after time that Maine  eliminate the Drugs for the Elderly and Medicare Savings Programs. Eliminating these two programs would mean a death sentence for some of Maine’s elderly. It is a crying shame when LePage’s tea party supporter’s tax dollars become more important then the life of an elderly Mainer who’s only crime was living too long.

    1. “They passed laws that helped old people in their final years of life.”

      And the ones that need that help stayed and those that could afford to pay for it moved to Florida to avoid paying Maine’s punitive taxes.  Of course they are only there for 6 months and a day so they still get to live in Maine, for free.

      In your world, how would you fix that problem?

      1. They move to Florida purely to avoid Maine’s punitive taxes? Why not just move to NH? It’s a lot closer.

          1. I don’t know anyone who does this. You apparently do. Could you ask them and get back to us. Find out if it is the warm weather.

  8. On another thread they’re arguing to keep 3 year olds in Head Start…I guess Mainer’s need to prioritize were what little bit of money we have is going to go for.  I for one would pay extra in taxes to see that the elderly are taken car of.  Three year olds should be taught what they need for a 3 year old by their parents.  Most of these children are already getting one on one services through the state anyway in order to help out the parents that say they can’t handle their out of control 2 and 3 year olds they get them labeled and presto they qualify for assistance in everything from getting their child up and dressed in the morning to “playing” with them for several hours a day after school or head start to give the stay at home parent a break.  We don’t have all the money we used to have so something has to give — I hope its not in the area of watching our elderly population die in front of our eyes.

  9. Make up my miond, you complain about high taxes then you want us to keep giving government (your and my tax dollars) away.  You can’t have it both ways.  If you want LaPage to give more to the poor, then why don’t you voluntarily send in more tax dollars? The guy is just trying to balance the budget, you know that means don’t spend more than you can take in.

    The US Park Service doesn’t want us to feed the wild animals for fear they will forget how to fend for themselves.  Too bad government didn’t adopt that policy for people 35 years ago when the democrats began controlling the Maine legislature for decades.  Yes there are people who are truly needy and we need to help them.  The problem is we also have more that don’t need help and for generations have lived off the generous government programs, to the point we can’t do it anymore.  We’re not going to stop that abuse without some innocent people getting hurt in the process, but I don’t think there is any other way.

    1. If the administration were concerned about “balancing the state budget” they would not have cut $350,000,000.00 in revenue.  This administration creates holes so they can justify the cuts.  As a tax payer, I’m still looking for my cut of the $350,000,000.00 in savings. Haven’t found it yet.  Had to send the state a bigger check than usual on 4/15 and looks like property taxes are up this year.  Good grief!

    2. So it’s okay with you if you hurt innocent people in the process?  What a jerk…

    1.  The feds will NEVER approve the cuts to Mainecare…..and when LePage put those cut to action watch the class action lawsuits pile up. Where are all the millions of dollars going to come from to cover those ? Not to mention the HUGE fines the feds will throw our way too…

  10. Too much is being taken from those who can least afford it…this is not “shared sacrifice.”  It is a travesty in which the low income retirees and children are being scavanged for a few dollars that would be meaningless to millionaires.

    1.  Most of the millionaires don’t live in Maine.  Those who can do so establish residency in a tax friendly state and “visit” Maine for 182 days a year. Even the liberals who claim we should pay more in taxes do it.

  11. Cutting the full time health care benefits for the part time government employees (the legislators) would be a good place to save some money. Don’t expect the Democrats OR the Republicans to propose that though. Leaders lead from the front.  These “leaders” use the people as human shields.

Leave a comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *