At first glance, Benjamin Stolz would appear to be the perfect prize for Republican presidential candidate Ron Paul.
Stolz, 18, a freshman at the University of Maryland, agrees wholeheartedly with Paul on a range of issues — from seeing foreign intervention as too costly to agreeing that government spending should be cut. Stolz, an enthusiastic first-time voter, also admires Paul’s frankness and the Texas congressman’s ability to draw diverse crowds.
And Wednesday night, Stolz attended his first political rally, waiting in a long line at the Ritchie coliseum in College Park to hear Paul speak, joining nearly 2,000 other students who chanted “End the Fed” as the candidate took the stage.
But Stolz, though seemingly easy pickings for the Paul camp, is actually Paul’s problem.
Stolz did not file the right paperwork to vote in his adopted state of Maryland in Tuesday’s Republican primary, when 37 delegates will be at stake. And for all his enthusiasm for Paul’s ideas, which he calls “classical liberalism,” Stolz will not be casting a ballot for him this season, either in Maryland or in his home state of New Jersey.
“I’m waiting until the real thing to make a decision,” Stolz said, referring to the November elections, adding that he would vote for Paul then if he made a third-party run. “The two-party system has collapsed. Paul is better than that.”
That, in essence, has been the Ron Paul story this campaign season: enthusiastic crowds who love Paul’s fierce independence but fail to carry him to victory at the polls. After running in 30 states and gaining a scant 50 delegates, according to the Associated Press, Paul has learned a hard lesson: Crowds don’t vote.
Even though Paul has had a superior ground game in many smaller caucus states and has raised nearly $40 million, he has been unable to grab a victory in any state and has tallied about 1.1 million votes, half Newt Gingrich’s haul and a quarter of Mitt Romney’s.
The problem is this: Although Paul is running to lead a party that looks like him — older, whiter, Southern — his crowds are younger, war-weary, more diverse and less likely to identify with one party or to vote.
The same independent streak that leads the young and the restless to Paul’s libertarian philosophy seems to make it more unlikely that these supporters will pick a side and a party, which is a requirement for many of the primary and caucus contests.
A University of Maryland “Youth for Ron Paul” Facebook page underscores this point, suggesting that party affiliation is best sold as a short-term fling: “If you haven’t yet, PLEASE register Republican (for just a month) to vote for Ron Paul in the MD primary.”
Polls show that 18- to 29-year-olds made up 15 percent or less of voters in every state where exit polls exist and that Paul lost the youth vote in every contest after Florida.
And although Paul is often considered to be the grandfather of the tea party, he has struggled to gain a sizable share of those voters. Paul earned single-digit support among strong tea party backers in 11 of 18 contests where exit polls are available.
Paul aides call the crowd and vote total disparity a “puzzler,” and they see a hard-core group of supporters who show up at rallies and the polls but a curious, less committed “outer ring” of new converts who don’t show up.
Political observers say Paul, who played above his size in early contests, has underperformed and faded down the stretch.
“He is like an art film that everyone in the artistic film community loves, but it bombs at the box office. He has a small, very passionate following that shouts bigger than its size,” said John Feehery, a Republican strategist. “They did well in smaller states, but at the end of the day you have to ask yourself if they really have that much power and if the tea party has that much power. ”
Yet in the GOP primary race, Paul and his aides see a kind of victory that can’t be measured in delegates. They see a party that is very much coming around to Paul’s limited-government, get-rid-of-it approach to almost everything. In rival Rick Santorum’s rhetoric about freedom and the Constitution, which Romney has tried to match, they see Paul’s fingerprints. And they note that Gingrich’s recent comments that the Afghanistan mission “may not be doable” edge close to Paul’s stance of a complete withdrawal.
Paul says that the race isn’t over yet and that there is still counting to be done in the state conventions, which they maintain will add many more delegates to Paul’s column.
“We haven’t counted all the votes yet because the delegate process is ongoing and we have a lot of states that we haven’t won the straw vote, but we’re going to see a lot of delegates come from this,” Paul said, when asked why he draws big crowds, but few votes. “One thing that is noticeable is that young people are more energetic and people notice them. Why we’re not in first place? It just means that this message is not received by everybody, but those numbers are changing.”
Paul certainly expanded his support beyond what he received in 2008, finishing a strong third in the Iowa caucuses and second in New Hampshire.
And although this could be the 76-year-old Paul’s last political race, there is still a second act: Sen. Rand Paul, R-Ky.
Although Rand Paul, who proclaimed himself the tea party senator when he won his Senate seat in 2010, has only rarely campaigned with his father, he is very much a part of his father’s race.
Among Rep. Paul’s top advisers is Trygve Olson, who advised Rand Paul during his Kentucky campaign.
In the younger Paul, tea party voters see something different.
Where Rep. Paul can be long-winded and professorial, Sen. Paul is direct and folksy.
“I would be a Rand Paul supporter in a heartbeat, but I’ve never seen myself as a Ron Paul supporter because I never thought Ron was someone who was able to govern,” said Ryan Rhoads, an Iowa tea party leader. “Ron Paul gets distracted on the podium. But Rand can explain what he believes, and does a better job of going out and trying to enact it.”
Whereas most candidates can at most hand off a list of contacts, Rep. Paul would hand off to his son an infrastructure, an organization (Campaign for Liberty) and a hard-core group of supporters looking to carry on the movement.
“Rand Paul is an omnipresent factor in this campaign. He helps us. It means that every dollar, every vote, every name and every piece of data is not in vain. It gives us purpose, something to learn from, something to improve on,” said Doug Wead, a senior adviser to the Paul campaign. “Even defeats are cherished and analyzed. A defeat, because of Rand, is a curiosity. It’s unspoken, but it’s very much present.”



Why Ron Paul can’t win a primary race?? Should be. “Why can’t the lying, corrupt, bought and paid for, unethical, biased media ever print or tell the truth?” Only Ron Paul 2012!!
With a trillion dollars worth of cuts in the first year, Ron Paul is a mortal threat to the ruling cabal.
If anyone cuts a trillion dollars in one year, its more than the cabal that will be hurting. Read up on Europe and their austerity woes and get back to me about that.
Yes we can and must stop the war spending and profiteering, and promote better programs that rely on tax dollars. Still, we need to be sane and responsible about cutting as well. The impacts of cutting too fast can be existentially threatening.
In general, you are correct that the media is all corporate owned and controlled. They suppress anything or anyone that talks about real change or solutions. We should all be wary of the popular press. It is not “liberal” or “conservative”, it is corporate.
If you want to see real candidates discuss real issues that affect OUR lives, vote for candidates that will support getting the money out of elections. That is the only hope our democracy has.
re:”
The impacts of cutting too fast can be existentially threatening.”
They’ve been telling us that lie now for decades. What makes you think they want to stop? Sooner or later, we’re going to just have to grip it and rip it and change that bandage.. I think sooner the better. It won’t be as bad as it would be with $30 trillion, for example, in debt hanging over our collective heads. Its so easy for them to add debt, it should be just as easy to remove it.
Such a short sighted and purely ideological position. All debt is not bad. Deleveraging can produce benefits provided it is not too sudden.
What you are seeing unfold in Spain and Greece demonstrates the pain that excessive austerity can cause. With youth unemployment above 50%, they are rife with social ills that always accompany such dysfunction. When done too quickly, the damage caused by civil unrest and sub-optimal participation makes the bad turn ugly in a hurry. Once the beast is unleashed, it is hard to regain a footing.
Our problem is we spend too much on war and military. It is not sustainable. If we spent what we spend on arms and bases and wars in productive investment, within a mere few years our economy would be the strongest in the world.
The recent trends of regressive taxation and deregulation have harmed consumers and home owners. Cutting non-military spending at this moment would destroy our stability.
As with most complex issues, its not the what its the how that matters. The current anti-government movement is dangerous to our continued existence.
Huh?
Didn’t he win the caucus here in Maine but the Maine GOP stole it from him?
Yes, I think voter fraud might have raised its ugly head. I think I read somewhere there was an investigation going on about it… I can’t remember where I read that..
he can’t win because the Corporation controlled media doesn’t want him in, so they refuse to even acknowledge he is running, it’s gotten so bad some people think he has dropped out, if they gave every candidate fair, unbiased reporting then he would get a fair chance, I can not believe people actually want the NDAA and the Patriot Act, I thought this was the “Land of the Free”… guess the jokes on us
It’s the dumbing down of America. People get their news in 30-60 second news clips with talking points. The media determines who the front runner is and everybody just wants to vote for the winner or not “waste their vote”. The multi-national corprorations run this Country and the masses are too stupid to do anything about it.
I bet they could get people to vote for a tree if they pushed it enough…
He can’t win because Republicans are liars when they say they want limited government and decreased spending.
Guys cnn viewership has dropped 50% in the last year. They just released there number 2 days ago. We are doing a great job. Ron Paul 2012!
I hope they go out of business and take the rest of the liars with them…
Freedom isn’t that popular. It is no surprise that the norm throughout history is tyranny and slavery.
“First they ignore you, then they ridicule you, then they fight you, then you win” – by Mahatma Gandhi.
… well, the news media has definitely tried the first two…
Ron Paul appeals to the young, and also has supporters from both sides of the political spectrum, making him the only republican who can possibly beat Obama. Not many other candidates have ever had as passionate group of supporters as this grandfather, nor have most candidates faced as much resistence within their own party as Paul or been subjected to as many internal dirty tricks as he has (look at the disgusting caucus fiasco in Maine: where are those “final vote tallies” Webster promised us on March 10, anyway?). The mainstream media ignores and fears Paul. Yup. He must be doing something right.
” Paul has learned a hard lesson: Crowds don’t vote.”
Corporations cant vote,
That doesnt stop corporations from trying to fix elections!
Ron Paul 2012!!!