AUGUSTA, Maine — Giving students more control over their education, along with greater accountability and flexibility are the centerpieces of a new direction for Maine’s K-12 schools outlined by the state’s education commissioner Tuesday.
At the Capital Area Technical Center at Cony High School, Stephen Bowen unveiled a plan that he and his staff have spent months researching and preparing.
Although the plan does not include any new programs or major policy initiatives, Bowen said it gives the state’s Education Department a sharper focus and, more importantly, puts students at the center.
“We need to build an education system that reaches every student,” he said. Part of that means building a system with “unprecedented flexibility and multiple avenues for student success.”
Chris Galgay, head of the Maine Education Association, the state’s teachers’ union, said he’s still analyzing the department’s proposal but said the union is willing to work with the department on the plan.
The plan released Tuesday, titled “Education Evolving — Maine’s Plan for Putting Learners First,” was spurred by public comment that Maine’s Department of Education lacked direction, and consequently, the state’s schools lack any comprehensive plan.
The comments were gathered last year when Commissioner Bowen held listening sessions around the state.
The plan states that although Maine’s test scores, drop-out-rates and other indicators of success are strong nationally, “progress is slow. Test scores are essentially flat, and graduation rates, while up slightly, are gaining too slowly.”
To pick up the pace of improvement, the department recommends a number of changes.
For example, students shouldn’t be grouped by age, but by ability, the report states. Their school schedule should be flexible and allow internships. Students should be able to take online courses that count for credit. They should be able to, in part, guide their own learning to their interests, according to the report. All of this might help keep Maine students engaged and lower the drop-out rate.
And all of these ideas must be implemented without spending more money, Bowen stressed Tuesday.
“We understand the limits that we confront,” he said. “We can’t start new programs, I can’t go to the Appropriations Committee and say ‘I need this much money.’ This needs to be about ‘How do we make better use of the resources we’ve got?’”
One major cost saver would be implementing technology system-wide and getting away from paper.
Meanwhile, teachers should be given access to help, such as information on which textbooks are effective and how other teachers have made an effect in important subject areas. The state will work with stakeholders to create guidelines how well the teachers perform, according to the plan.
For teachers who don’t perform well, the state will create regional centers for professional development training. Teachers might also be given data on their students, if the state department is allowed to start tracking students’ learning through the years.
“Ensuring that education policies and programs at both the state and local levels are effective requires a robust, transparent accountability and improvement system that tracks the growth and achievement of every learner,” the plan states.
Under No Child Left Behind, the state is allowed to track groups of students and can, for instance, look at how last year’s eighth-graders compare to this year’s eighth-graders. The department wants to better track individual students, which would let the department identify under-performing schools and help tailor learning plans for individual students.
There are already schools in Maine innovating and finding new ways to captivate students, Bowen said, and he wants his department to organize those good ideas and make them accessible to other schools.
Maggie Stokes, a fourth-grader from Oakland, spoke about her experiences that have allowed her better control over her curriculum.
“I like the new way of learning because it makes fourth grade a lot more interesting,” Stokes said Tuesday while standing on a box to reach the podium. “We have goals and we make our own rules with the teacher’s help based on the standards. And we have lots of voice and choice, which I like.”
Gareth Robinson, an eighth-grader at Auburn Middle School, said technology has been the key to his level of engagement inside the classroom and away from it.
“I wouldn’t want to go to a school without technology; I can’t even imagine what it would be like,” he said, using his iPhone to read his speech. “If I had a choice, I’d rather be clicking.”
Two Sumner Memorial High School students who participate in the Pathways program, which allows them to learn in alternative ways, talked about the benefits of online classes, internships, adult education and independent studies to supplement their time in the classroom.
Kaytie Scully, a senior at Sumner, admitted she had a rough start to her high school career, but she has found purpose by enrolling in a certified nursing education course through adult education. She will get both high school credit and a professional certificate when she’s done.
Morgan Horn, a junior at Sumner, has been able to take summer classes and to do work outside of normal school hours so that she can graduate a semester early and go to college.
The department has highlighted 10 different areas that could benefit from having online discussions about what is working, such as in special education, textbook selection, digital learning programs and in how schools integrate the community into learning and more.
“Teaching has been and continues to be a largely solitary practice providing few opportunities for collaboration and sharing of best practices. With the advent of the Internet, the sharing of new ideas and new approaches to teaching can be far more readily facilitated,” the report states. “Instructional materials, research on best practices, and even videos of effective instructional methods can be shared instantly across the state and around the world. Today, though, no single statewide library of such materials exists.”
Aside from creating databases, online guides and regional professional development centers, the plan takes few other steps on telling people how, exactly, this plan will work. The Education Department doesn’t say how it might implement its biggest ideas, like changing age-based school levels or using online courses for school credit. The department intends to form committees to work on these plans.
Galgay, representing the union, said it’s difficult in Maine to mandate anything because local school districts have authority over their schools.
William Shuttleworth, the superintendent of Camden-area schools supports the plan, which he called “rather radical.”
“I am most drawn to the concept of ‘any time, anywhere learning,’ making the world a student’s campus. The role of schools must change to adapt to the incredible learning opportunities that exist outside of school,” Shuttleworth said. “[This plan] will take our current professional staff, all of us, to shape-shift from a teacher owned and directed model for education to a student-centered model. Having been in the business for 40 years, I fear it will take quite a while.”
Some of the Maine Department of Education’s plans, particularly the policy-driven aspects, won’t begin until at least 2013.
More details may emerge at a work session with the Legislature’s Education Committee scheduled for Wednesday morning.



They should be able to take online courses for credit, but not in the abscence of going to school.
I agree. Furthermore, I think if a student is that advanced, they should not be allowed to graduate when they are 14 or 15. They should be able to go through their adolescence with their classmates, while the school stipulates the graduation. During this time, the gifted child could be using time spent at school to enroll and take online college courses. By the time the child is matured enough to enter college, he or she will be a junior or even a senior. And obviously could use this time to pursue graduate studies.
Ted Kaczynski, the unabomber, graduated high school when he was 15, and often found himself left out of the loop.
And I can see no reason to track a single student. What’s the reasoning? How would they justify using that information as it regards another student or a policy? Kids have rights too, which is the reason why the no child left behind law prohibits this.
yours is the second comment i read questioning the tracking of single students. i could see where a problem student cant keep up and the teacher needs to show that it is not the teacher but the student who is the problem. this comes into the assessment of teachers, and how well they are teaching. if a teacher is doing his job he should not be penalized for poor student performance, when there is a history pertaining to an individual student.
But they want to track individual student’s, not for the student’s sake, but to identify “under performing schools”. There are plenty of other tools that can be used to identify under performing schools, and I honestly can’t see how tracking single students would assist in doing this. Each of those student’s being tracked would have their own strengths and weaknesses.
The law doesn’t allow it for a reason. It allows group tracking, but not individual.
Excuse me for not understanding what you or the law allows. Are you saying that if there is a class of say 20 kids and 15 of them are not performing dragging down the class average, the whole class should be held back? Or how about a class with 15 kids who bust their butts and get good to excellent marks but are saddled with 5 who do nothing. Should the do nothings be allowed to graduate with the scholars?
What I am saying doesn’t have anything at all to do with a class of kids. What I’m saying is ; and according to this article, the No Child Left Behind law prohibits the tracking of single students …for any reason. It doesn’t prohibit the tracking of a group of students, for any reason. This Commissioner wants to track individual students (which is prohibited) for a questionable reason, which is identifying under performing schools.
Why is the Commissioner proposing tracking individual students, when he knows that it’s prohibited? And his reasoning is questionable; how can you judged an entire school system by tracking an individual a few individual students separately? That doesn’t make sense.
No one should graduate without achieving all of the standards set by the school district and state. Using the group tracking method, you would find out those who actually don’t meet the standard, but end up graduating. That’s an indication of a under performing school district.
Why would you not want individual students tracked, evaluated and graded?
big brother is watching
Can you imagine the increased number of staff (non-teaching, of course) that individual tracking would require?
So your opposition to this basically revolves around the premise that if we change the way we educate our kids, we will create a bunch of little UnaBombers?
No, I don’t have any opposition to the proposal, with the exception of tracking individual students. My comment about the gifted students was a suggestion. I have seen kids that have graduated when they are 15, enter college at 16 and drop out by the time they are 18 (around the time they should be starting college).
My suggestion allows the student to grow both academically and socially with their peers.
I just used the unabomber as an example of how hard the social adjustments can be for a gifted child that is academically with their peers, but socially are not.
It seems that you are worried that over achievers, few and far between these days, will be socially stigmatized if they are recognized and pushed beyond their peers age. What most of us should be concerned about are those who are pushed through the system without gaining the ability to read and write at a minimum level of competency.
Unless a child is mentally handicaped, there is NO excuse for them graduating HS or elementary school, classified as funcitonally illiterate.
With the graduation rates in Maine being within the top echelon of the nation, I think it’s fair to be concerned with both types of students; the gifted and the under achievers. Obviously both need re-direction, and both are unique.
I would welcome you to identify “mentally handicapped”, what if it’s a simple learning disability?, what if it’s a parental non attention issue?, what if it’s a biological problem?
I agree, there is no excuse for pushing student’s through if they are not up to the standards. But if they are being pushed through, that’s an administrative problem that ought to be corrected. Succinctly, tracking one student will not demonstrate a pattern of pushing through, tracking a group of under achieving student’s will better do that, AND, perhaps better diagnose what is in common with them.
yeah, perfect. Let them copy/paste the answers from the internet while never really learning anything…
I’m not sure I get the part where they want to evaluate the students individually. I was always under the impression that the teachers, who are the ones who are in direct contact with the students, should have a pretty good handle on who is doing the work and who is not. Unless something has drastically changed that I was unaware of, shouldn’t we be asking the teachers?
Years ago those students that didn’t pass the required tests to reach the next grade level were left behind to repeat the year. It was a simple system that allowed the children to make the decision to do the work or not. Some children develop earlier than others and were allowed to skip a grade if they showed the ability.
Quoted from the article: “The state will create rigorous evaluation methods to determine how well the teachers perform, according to the plan.”
Rigorous (Rigor)
1
: manifesting, exercising, or favoring rigor: very strict2a : marked by extremes of temperature or climateb : Harsh, Severea (1) : harsh inflexibility in opinion, temper, or judgment :Severity (2) : the quality of being unyielding or inflexible :Strictness (3) : severity of life : Austerityb : an act or instance of strictness, severity, or cruelty3: a condition that makes life difficult, challenging, or uncomfortable; especially : extremity of cold
Gotta love the consistency of the State of Maine when it comes to its teachers…Which definition of rigorous do you think the state is planning on for its teachers and their evaluations? “extreme”, “harsh”, “severe”, “inflexibility”, “cruelty”, “uncomfortable”, or a combination of several???
The GOP goal is to destroy the public education system, so corporations and billionaires can add schools to their list of conquests.
Rich kids will be taught well, poor kids in religious charter schools for the poor will be taught that evolution is a lie and global warming is a farce.
Whoa, Spruce, put down the kool-aid…
this plan seems like a big bag of fail.
Do you suppose that this plan was as well thought out and vetted as most of the others put forward by Big Paulie and the Maine Heritage Center? Seems long on ideals and short on ideas. Typical. Hang on schools, another unfunded mandate for towns to suck up take.
This is just more of the same. Continue to blame the teachers without acknowledging that parents and students, themselves, must be held accountable as well. Provide the teachers with what they need to do their jobs effectively. Give them the physical support, materials and additional professional training when needed. Start listening to them and stop making excuses why you can’t/won’t provide necessities. Example: I had an extremely violent and disruptive child in my classroom of 19 other students. This child qualified for ed. tech. help. It was NOT provided. Because of the child’s outbursts and no help with this problem, I lost months of teaching time.
It’s been my experience that most teachers want to do their best for every child, but other factors get in the way- and sometimes, it’s the administration!
Giving students more control you’re kidding???????? wake up what you need is everyone involved. parents, grandparents need to be involved , looking for something to do? Go volunteer at your local school. Work with these kids one on one. This will NOT work, I will tell you why. Not all children learn the same way. The children that will have a problem with this are the ones that are failing.
I agree. I work in schools, and I am waiting for the “empower the kids crowd” to ask the bazillionth of today’s kids, “so, what do you want to do…uh, I dunno, play some xbox…that’s technology, right?”
The driven, focused students who have SUPPORT AT HOME will flourish (as they will under nearly any system). The ones with no focus, ambition, or people at home who are interested in the student’s education (and let the students stay home half the time or more will not be successful. Giving them MORE power over their education is not the answer to a societal problem. Of course there should be multiple pathways to a student’s success, but there is a pretty clear line as to when that student also simply has things he or she needs to do in schools. How about the education commissioner talk about trying to get more teeth into truancy laws, work with the district attorney, etc. Somebody please tell me the plan that will work for a student who misses 30, 40, EIGHTY or more days of school. Trust me, those cases are not rare.
I agree. I work in schools, and I am waiting for the “empower the kids crowd” to ask the bazillionth of today’s kids, “so, what do you want to do…uh, I dunno, play some xbox…that’s technology, right?”
The driven, focused students who have SUPPORT AT HOME will flourish (as they will under nearly any system). The ones with no focus, ambition, or people at home who are interested in the student’s education (and let the students stay home half the time or more will not be successful. Giving them MORE power over their education is not the answer to a societal problem. Of course there should be multiple pathways to a student’s success, but there is a pretty clear line as to when that student also simply has things he or she needs to do in schools. How about the education commissioner talk about trying to get more teeth into truancy laws, work with the district attorney, etc. Somebody please tell me the plan that will work for a student who misses 30, 40, EIGHTY or more days of school. Trust me, those cases are not rare.
I agree. I work in schools, and I am waiting for the “empower the kids crowd” to ask the bazillionth of today’s kids, “so, what do you want to do…uh, I dunno, play some xbox…that’s technology, right?”
The driven, focused students who have SUPPORT AT HOME will flourish (as they will under nearly any system). The ones with no focus, ambition, or people at home who are interested in the student’s education (and let the students stay home half the time or more will not be successful. Giving them MORE power over their education is not the answer to a societal problem. Of course there should be multiple pathways to a student’s success, but there is a pretty clear line as to when that student also simply has things he or she needs to do in schools. How about the education commissioner talk about trying to get more teeth into truancy laws, work with the district attorney, etc. Somebody please tell me the plan that will work for a student who misses 30, 40, EIGHTY or more days of school. Trust me, those cases are not rare.
I don’t think penalizing those kids because they have lousy parents is the way to go. They may decide “to heck with this” and drop out. That would be sad; just because their parents don’t care doesn’t mean these kids don’t have potential.
I was one of those kids that didn’t have support at home…I probably missed on average 30 days of school a year and I don’t think cracking down on truancy would have helped. Once, I got something like 30 detentions for being late a ridiculous number of times… it would made me angry at the school because it was my parents, not me, but I had not control over them and what time they decided to bring me to school (there was no bus).
I really don’t know what we could do about parents like that…they will always exist. From my experiences, those types of parents really just do not care and nothing anyone does is going to make them care.
I like the ideas in the article…especially about not lumping kids together just because they are the same age. I like the idea of high school kids being able to take classes outside of high school. I don’t think our education system focuses enough on real skills. High school is, in many ways, a waste of time as far as what is taught. Perhaps if student feel they are being taught things they can actually apply to the real world, they may be more interested.
I don’t think penalizing those kids because they have lousy parents is the way to go. They may decide “to heck with this” and drop out. That would be sad; just because their parents don’t care doesn’t mean these kids don’t have potential.
I was one of those kids that didn’t have support at home…I probably missed on average 30 days of school a year and I don’t think cracking down on truancy would have helped. Once, I got something like 30 detentions for being late a ridiculous number of times… it would make me angry at the school because it was my parents, not me, but I had no control over them and what time they decided to bring me to school (there was no bus).
I really don’t know what we could do about parents like that…they will always exist. From my experiences, those types of parents really just do not care and nothing anyone does is going to make them care.
I agree. I work in schools, and I am waiting for the “empower the kids crowd” to ask the bazillionth of today’s kids, “so, what do you want to do…uh, I dunno, play some xbox…that’s technology, right?”
The driven, focused students who have SUPPORT AT HOME will flourish (as they will under nearly any system). The ones with no focus, ambition, or people at home who are interested in the student’s education (and let the students stay home half the time or more will not be successful. Giving them MORE power over their education is not the answer to a societal problem. Of course there should be multiple pathways to a student’s success, but there is a pretty clear line as to when that student also simply has things he or she needs to do in schools. How about the education commissioner talk about trying to get more teeth into truancy laws, work with the district attorney, etc. Somebody please tell me the plan that will work for a student who misses 30, 40, EIGHTY or more days of school. Trust me, those cases are not rare.
So, they will implement this from kindergarten through 12th grade? When my son began school, I decided not to send him to public school because they did not have fulltime kindergarten and no standards. Before my son was accepted at the private school, he had to meet with the senior kindergarten teacher in order to meet certain standards. I know this could be done in public school also. Yes, the public school has to accept everyone, but there is nothing wrong with the initial testing of each student. And, this could and should be developed so that it is not intimidating for the child.
This plan will be an utter failure even though I’m sure Mr. Bowen will tell us in a few years, “We’re not quite where we want to be yet but we are making good progress.” What needs to happen is for more parents to become much-much-much more involved in every aspect of their children’s lives. Especially how they are doing day to day in school. That wouldn’t cost a dime! That’s something that certainly won’t be told to you by a political putz like Mr. Bowen who wants you to believe that he has all the answers and you the voter need do nothing but sit back and let everyone else educate, socialize, and instill higher aspirations into your children.
Let me make this easy to understand. If your child disrespects you from time to time, guess what he/she is doing all day long at school? No one, child or adult will ever learn anything unless they have respect for the process (WANT to gain educational skills/Have aspirations to learn) and those running it (Aids, lunch ladies, custodians, bus drivers, teachers, and administrators). None of those people will stand a chance of educating, socializing, or instilling higher aspirations into a child UNLESS that child’s parents are FIRST doing likewise at home or at the very least backing those efforts by school staff 100% whenever the need arises. In many cases, I’d have to say neither of those is currently taking place.
If you think I’m onto something here, you’re likely working hard as a parent. If you think I’m full of it, then in my mind and experience it’s not your child or the school that is the problem, the problem is you!
Good thing I’m not running for office, huh?
we need to have the children realize that going to school is their job — mom and dad need to be more involved and let’s get over this nobody fails idea that is promoted today so some ones feelings are not hurt — if you do not acheive you fail
I know it’s shocking, but I agree totally. Respect must start at home.
The definition of insanity is to continue to do things the same way. achieving the same failed results.
Education in this state and further more the country is an obvious failure. Not because we haven’t spent enough money either. As long as we allow the unions to dictate the direction we can take as tax payers and parents, things will not improve.
The school year should be longer with fewer holidays and no teacher in-service during the regular school schedule. There is plenty of opportunity for teacher education and chit-chat during the summer!
Why are we surprised to see so many from other countries that have higher education standards taking the more technical and highly compensated jobs away from us!
Let’s not continue to be in denial and end up a third world country.
Very simplistic observation.
I’m an educator for over 30 years. I agree with the notion of a longer school year to become more competitive on a global level. One big question to consider. Who do you think is going to pay for the expenses with a longer school year?
Many successful homeschoolers use the approach described in this article. They are proof that longer days and a longer school years is not needed to provide a quality education. In fact, shorter days and fewer days will in fact produce a better quality education as long as a skilled and knowledgeable teacher is involved.
Who is this guy big Pauleys nephew?
Although the plan does not include any new programs or major policy initiatives, Bowen said it gives the state’s Education Department a sharper focus and, more importantly, puts students at the center. He has done nothing.
It’s comforting as a now retired homeschooling parent to see that public education is now advocating many of the things that homeschooling parents have known and embraced for decades. This approach has worked wonderfully for thousands of homeschooling families across the country.
Yet more edu-speak goobleygook from Augusta (or rather MHPC). I really think one could read Bowen’s missive and substitute the word “rutabaga” for tripe like “unprecedented flexibility and avenues for student success” without losing much. Here’s what this will translate to: yet more attacks on public school teachers (who might have the hardest job in this state on a day-to-day basis); more contract work for private-side education concerns, who, after all, produce all the wonderful online courses Johnny will be taking in the middle of July; and more calls for things like magnet schools and charter schools and what not to provide that flexibility and those avenues. I’m sorry, but a public high school in a Maine mill town could have Jesus of Nazareth teaching about religious history and Einstein discussing math, but if the kids there have not bought into learning (and, perhaps most importantly, if their parents haven’t either) nothing, absolutely nothing is going to happen. Period.
I currently work at an Independent School in the Midcoast and this has been the philosophy for the last 39 years.