CONCORD, N.H. — Mitt Romney cruised to a solid victory in the New Hampshire primary Tuesday night, picking up steam from his first-place finish in the lead-off Iowa caucuses and firmly establishing himself as the man to beat for the Republican presidential nomination.
“Tonight we made history,” Romney told cheering supporters before pivoting to a stinging denunciation of President Barack Obama. “The middle class has been crushed … our debt is too high and our opportunities too few,” he declared — ignoring the rivals who had been assailing him for weeks and making clear he intends to be viewed as the party’s nominee in waiting after only two contests.
His Republican rivals said otherwise, looking ahead to South Carolina on Jan. 21 as the place to stop the former Massachusetts governor. Already, several contenders and committees supporting them had put down heavy money to reserve time for television advertising there.
Even so, the order of finish — Ron Paul second, followed by Jon Huntsman, with Newt Gingrich and Rick Santorum trailing — scrambled the field and prolonged the increasingly desperate competition to emerge as the true conservative rival to Romney.
With his victory, Romney became the first Republican to sweep the first two contests in competitive races since 1976. Based on partial returns, The Associated Press estimated that turnout would exceed the 2008 record by about 4 percent.
Romney fashioned his victory despite a sustained assault by rivals eager to undermine his claim as the contender best situated to beat Obama and help reduce the nation’s painfully high unemployment. Gingrich led the way, suggesting at one point that Romney, a venture capitalist, was a corporate raider. The front-runner’s defenders said the rhetoric was more suitable to a Democratic opponent than a conservative Republican.
Returns from 69 percent of New Hampshire precincts late Tuesday night showed Romney with 38 percent of the vote, followed by Texas Rep Paul with 24 percent, former Utah Gov. Huntsman with 17 percent and former House Speaker Gingrich and former Pennsylvania Sen. Santorum with 10 percent each.
In interviews as they left their polling places, New Hampshire voters said the economy was the issue that mattered most to them, and a candidate’s ability to defeat Obama outranked other qualities.
Romney had won in Iowa by a scant eight votes over Santorum, and gained barely a quarter of the vote there.
On Tuesday, he battled not only his rivals but also high expectations as the ballots were counted, particularly since his pursuers had virtually conceded New Hampshire, next door to the state Romney governed for four years.
Seeking to undercut Romney’s victory, Gingrich and others suggested in advance that anything below 40 percent or so would indicate weakness by the nomination front-runner.
They didn’t mention that Sen. John McCain’s winning percentage in the 2008 primary was 37 percent.
Romney’s win was worth at least four delegates to the Republican National Convention next summer. Paul earned at least two delegates and Huntsman at least one. Another four remained to be awarded, based on final vote totals.
“Tonight we celebrate,” Romney told his supporters. “Tomorrow we go back to work.”
Unlike Iowa and New Hampshire, where unemployment is well below the national average, joblessness is far higher in South Carolina. That creates a different political environment for the race.
The state also has a reputation for primaries turning nasty, and it appeared that all of Romney’s pursuers read the new Hampshire returns as reason enough to remain in the race.
Texas Gov. Rick Perry, who skipped New Hampshire to get a head start in South Carolina, said Tuesday’s results showed “the race for a conservative alternative to Mitt Romney remains wide open.”
“We’re nibbling at his heels,” Paul said of Romney.
Huntsman had staked his candidacy on a strong showing in New Hampshire, and he announced after the polls closed that he had passed his own test. “Where we stand is a solid position and we go south from here,” he said.
Despite struggling to gain 10 percent in New Hampshire, Gingrich and Santorum also said they were in.
About one-third of Republican voters interviewed as they left their polling places said the most important factor in choosing a candidate was finding someone who could defeat Obama in the fall. Romney won their support overwhelmingly.
He ran about even with Huntsman among the one-quarter of the voters who cited experience as the most important factor in selecting a candidate to support.
Paul ran first among voters who cited moral character or true conservatism.
As was the case last week in Iowa, the economy was the issue that mattered most to voters, 61 percent of those surveyed. Another 24 percent cited record federal deficits.
Romney carried the first group and split the second with Paul.
The survey results came from interviews conducted for The Associated Press and the television networks with 2,670 voters across the state. It had a margin of sampling error of plus or minus 3 percentage points.
New Hampshire has a rich history of humbling favorites, front-runners and even an occasional incumbent.
The state’s Republican voters embarrassed President George H.W. Bush in 1992, when he won but was held to 53 percent of the vote against Pat Buchanan, running as an insurgent in difficult economic times. Buchanan, who never held public office, won the primary four years later over Sen. Bob Dole of Kansas, who was the nominee in the fall.
In 2000, national front-runner George W. Bush rolled into the state after a convincing first-place finish in Iowa but wound up a distant second behind McCain. Bush later won the GOP nomination and then the presidency.
Twelve Republican National Convention delegates were at stake on Tuesday, out of 1,144 needed to win the nomination.
Obama was unopposed in the Democratic primary.
In his first presidential run in 2008, Romney finished second in the state to McCain. This time, he campaigned with the Arizona senator’s endorsement, as well as backing from Sen. Kelly Ayotte and numerous other members of the state’s Republican establishment.
Romney committed a pair of unforced errors in the campaign’s final 48 hours, and the other contenders sought to capitalize.
On Sunday, after a pair of weekend debates only 12 hours apart, the millionaire former businessman said he understood the fear of being laid off. “There were a couple of times when I was worried I was going to get pink-slipped,” he said, although neither he nor his aides offered specifics.
And on Monday, in an appearance before the Nashua Chamber of Commerce, Romney was discussing health insurance coverage when he said, “I like being able to fire people who provide services to me. If someone doesn’t give me the good service I need, I’m going to go get somebody else to provide that service to me.”
Huntsman, a former Utah governor, saw an opening. “Gov. Romney enjoys firing people. I enjoy creating jobs,” he said.
And Gingrich said Bain Capital, the venture capital firm Romney once headed, “apparently looted the companies, left people totally unemployed and walked off with millions of dollars.”
Romney has made his business experience a cornerstone of his presidential campaign, saying that Bain on balance created 100,000 jobs, and as a result, he understands how to help boost employment.
He sought to shrug off the attacks, saying he had expected them from Obama in the fall, but Gingrich and others had decided to go first. “Things can always be taken out of context,” he said.
___
Associated Press writers Philip Elliott, Shannon McCaffrey, Kasie Hunt, Beth Fouhy and Holly Ramer in New Hampshire, Brian Bakst in South Carolina and Connie Cass in Washington contributed to this report. Espo reported from Washington.



So, having gotten 1/3rd of the vote is a win? With that thinking, he could be Governor of Maine!
I wonder if that is how he became MA Governor…
Surprise, surprise! America has always liked plastic flip-flops
Why can’t we get a candidate that we can get behind(rhetorical question)?
As an aside, NBC news poll showed NH as either angry or very angry at Obama to the tune of 81%.
check out the Gallup poll graphic, which shows a pretty straight line of approval and disapproval ratings hovering in the mid 40-50% range. not sure where you get the 81% disapproval figure. Obama’s approval was lowest in the fall, below 40%, but seems to be on the uptick as his disapproval numbers drop.
http://www.gallup.com/poll/113980/gallup-daily-obama-job-approval.aspx
Thanx for the link, although I didn’t click on it. The national has been 45% approval, but the NBC evening news said with NH voters, the poll I quoted was 81%
Polls are notoriously wrong anyway. :-)
hard to explain, perhaps NBC was polling today’s primary voters, which would make them GOP, of course.
Actually it was an general inclusive poll from yesterday. Wish I could give a link, but I’m still a bit of a computer illiterate, hence my TV news quotes. Doesn’t really matter anyway; polls don’t influence my opinions. Too many people are subliminally influenced by them and human nature wants us to vote for the ‘winner’.
NH is probably one of the most Libertarian leaning states in America. You shouldn’t put much weight in that poll. You have to understand the dynamics of NH. I used to live there. :)
I too have lived in NH (Keen and Walpole area). You hit the nail on the head with your assessment of them.
If you look back at my posts, you’ll see what I think of polls. :-)
Less than 30% of precincts reporting and BDN is already reporting a Romney win? A bit premature, don’t you think? And of course, BDN will completely ignore Ron Paul. In fact, I doubt BDN will even mention his name. Lickspittles, all.
You think that is bad…NBC and CNN both projected him winning with 11% reporting…the media is on the quick assumption for Romney to win everything now it seems.
Didn’t you know…….Goldman Sachs and the media are backing Romney.
I was hoping Huntsman had a chance….
So, Mittens spent 7 years and millions of dollars (he earned from firing people) working to win the NH Primary – and can’t get 40% of the vote – in NH – which is next door to Mass. – where he was Governor?
This Great Victory makes LePage’s win look like a landslide.
What joke.
yessah
Poor showing for Santorum: thought Iowa would give him momentum. I guess his brand of social conservatism doesn’t play well in NH…
The stress on the Clown Car springs is growing lighter and lighter. Still it’s looking pretty sad. Soon it will be time to haul it to the scrap yard under the power of a single strong donkey.
As someone who is not a fan of Obama in any way, shape, or form; I can honestly say that what the repubs are presenting as ‘Presidential’ candidates is grotesque. Yes, I’m a RP supporter but I wouldn’t care if he was a D or an R, I’m just looking for someone who’ll actually represent the people and do their best to uphold the constitution. It’s beginning to seem as though that’s just too much to ask!! In my opinion Progressive left and Super Conservative right are one and the same. They’re not in it to do what’s best for everyone, they’re in it to push their views on the rest of us. I’ve had enough and am voting my conscience. No matter who you all vote for, I hope you do the same.
Well I support Ron Paul but my conscience know that as long as voters and taxpayers let the FBI get away with committing voter fraud there is no democracy.
see
http://www.thelandesreport.com/Donsanto.htm
Why won’t the Department of Justice (DOJ) investigate
electronic vote fraud?
Is it because the DOJ and FBI have long been involved in it, themselves?
The Cincinnati Bell-FBI
scandal: Leonard
Gates, a Cincinnati Bell employee for 23 years, testified that in
the late 1970’s and 80’s, the FBI assisted telephone companies with hacking
into mainframe election computers in cities across the country.
He spoke with agents from both the DOJ (U.S.
Attorney Kathleen M. Brinkman) and FBI (Agent Love), but to his
knowledge, neither agency took further action.
Leonard Gates 1987Deposition, plus
1985 Background Material from Jim Condit, Jr.
//Pandora’s Black Box
&
http://www.votefraud.org/expert_strunk_report.htm (contains case
number)
Gates testified, P. 28, “He
(Gates’s supervisor, Mr. Jim West,) said the programming was obtained out of
California, and that the programming had been obtained through the FBI, and all
this kind of stuff, and that was about it.”
Page 34 excerpt: “And
I knew that we did do certain things under certain court direction, under
certain court orders, and I just didn’t see where they would have a court
order to get into that, and I expressed my concern to Mr. Dugan (President of
Cincinnati Bell). Mr. Dugan said it was a very gray area, and that they
were into like New York and Atlanta, Georgia, and to the other computers, you
know. This was just small compared to what was going on.”
Page 39, “…and I said, “Well, do you (Mr.Fedrich, vice
president of Cincinnati Bell) have a blanket court order on this or what?”
And he kind of weasel-worded me, to be honest with you. He said “Well, our
relationship with the FBI is very, very close.”
Excerpt from Nov 1996, Pandora’s
Black Box by
Philip M. O’Halloran of Relevance, The Cincinnati Election Wiretapping
Scandal: