Maine ships get cleaner engines as part of program to dramatically reduce emissions

Two older diesel engines rest on blocks at Billings Diesel and Marine boatyard in Stonington in front of The Pink Lady, a whale watching boat operated out of Boothbay Harbor by Cap'n Fish's Whale Watch. Work crews at the boatyard are installing two new &quotclean diesel" engines in The Pink Lady II that will reduce air pollution emissions by 21 percent and save roughly 3,000 gallons of
fuel annually.
Kevin Miller | BDN
Two older diesel engines rest on blocks at Billings Diesel and Marine boatyard in Stonington in front of The Pink Lady, a whale watching boat operated out of Boothbay Harbor by Cap'n Fish's Whale Watch. Work crews at the boatyard are installing two new "clean diesel" engines in The Pink Lady II that will reduce air pollution emissions by 21 percent and save roughly 3,000 gallons of fuel annually. Buy Photo
Posted Nov. 13, 2011, at 7:25 p.m.
Last modified Nov. 14, 2011, at 12:13 a.m.
Print this   E-mail this    Facebook this   Tweet this     

STONINGTON, Maine — New car shoppers visiting any dealer lot today will find plenty of examples of how the automotive industry has responded to increasingly stringent regulations on the unhealthy stuff that spews from vehicle tailpipes.

From low-emission to zero-emission vehicles and hybrids to “clean diesels,” consumers can choose from a variety of technologies that mean today’s new cars belch a fraction of the pollution emitted by cars in the 1960s and 1970s while burning substantially less fuel.

But commercial ships are estimated to emit nearly half as much particle pollution — or soot — as all of the world’s cars combined and therefore represent major contributors to smog and air pollution problems in coastal areas.

Thanks to a unique state-federal program, however, nearly 70 vessels in Maine and New Hampshire have received new, cleaner-burning marine engines during the past three years and in the process helped provide work to Maine boatyards during a tough economic period.

“It has definitely helped,” said Greg Sanborn, service manager at Billings Diesel and Marine, a Stonington boatyard that has received 14 of the contracts. “On the mechanical side, we probably would have held our own. But this has really provided a shot in the arm.”

The engine “repowering” program really began in 2008 as part of the economic stimulus plan passed by Congress. Maine received roughly $1.4 million the next year through a U.S. Environmental Protection Agency program in which boat owners can receive federal grants to cover up to 50 percent of the cost of replacing their old powerhouse with a new “clean diesel” engine.

That initial grant paid for engine replacements — or repowering — on 52 vessels ranging from lobster boats to mail boats and larger ferries. Vessel owners were allowed to choose which Maine boatyard could do the work and often used the savings from the federal grant to pay for additional work.

Maine since has received additional money from the EPA to pay for 17 more repowering projects.

Lynne Cayting, a Maine Department of Environmental Protection staffer who administered the federal grant program in this state, said the majority of the vessels in the first round were lobster boats. That’s because fishermen realized that they could substantially reduce fuel consumption by switching to new diesel engines, she said.

Cayting, who directs the DEP’s mobile air pollution sources program, compared the marine engine repowering program to another clean diesel program in which the department retrofitted more than 500 school buses to illustrate the scope of the reductions.

“The 52 vessels we did under the stimulus program had greater emissions reductions than those 500 school buses because the engines I am replacing are nonregulated engines,” Cayting said. “So they are very dirty engines.”

Although vehicle traffic and industrial sources often get the blame for smog, ships emit a significant portion of the soot and smog-causing pollution around the globe, according to recent research.

A 2009 study by the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration and the University of Colorado at Boulder determined that diesel-burning commercial ships emit 2.2 million pounds of particle pollution each year. That figure represents roughly half of the particle pollution produced by all of the cars around the globe.

“Since more than 70 percent of shipping traffic takes place within 250 miles of the coastline, this is a significant health concern for coastal communities,” Daniel Lack, a University of Colorado researcher who was lead author of the study, said at the time.

Roughly half of the pollution from ships are sulfates that are the target of recent low-sulfur fuel requirements for large ships as well as more aggressive rules for cars and trucks. But smaller boats, such as lobster boats, are not subject to the same requirements as large cargo or cruise ships, Cayting said.

Boatyards from southern Maine to Jonesport have received work through the grant program. Last week at Billings Diesel and Marine in Stonington, a crew was busy finishing installation of two new Caterpillar engines on the Pink Lady II, a whale watching boat that operates out of Boothbay Harbor.

The Pink Lady II and the Governor Curtis ferry operated by the Maine State Ferry Service are the two most recent recipients of the federal matching grants. The improvements are expected to reduce nitrogen oxide and particulate matter emissions on the Pink Lady II by 21 percent as well as lower annual fuel consumption by 3,000 gallons. The Governor Curtis, meanwhile, is expected to realize a 44 percent reduction in emissions and save 8,250 gallons of fuel, according to figures supplied by the EPA.

Sanborn at Billings Marine acknowledged that he is not typically a big fan of government grant programs. But Billings Marine has received a substantial chunk of the repowering projects because of the boatyard’s location, ability to handle larger vessels and work with some of the more sought-after engine types.

And like other vessels that have passed through Billings Marine, the Pink Lady II is also getting some cosmetic and other work performed while in dry dock. Sanborn said most projects take two to three weeks to complete and involve anywhere from 120 to 250 man hours.

“This has worked very well,” he said. “I think they have gotten good value for their money.”

Cayting said there were no other models for Maine to work with when designing the program. But she credited boatyards for working with her to recommend ways to implement the program.

Similar articles:

Marketplace News

Marketplace

Guidelines for posting on bangordailynews.com

The Bangor Daily News encourages comments about stories, but you must follow our terms of service.

In brief:

  1. Keep it civil and stay on topic
  2. No vulgarity, racial slurs, name-calling or personal attacks.
  3. People who harass others or joke about tragedies will be blocked.

The primary rule here is pretty simple: Treat others with the same respect you'd want for yourself. Here are some guidelines (see more):

  • maine 456

    Part of it is that its all about speed these days, I never understood these lobsterboats that have 1000 hp and burn 60 gallons an hour, its probably why a lot of the younger guys with new boats went under when the lobster prices crashed. 
    a 32′ boat with full displacement hull and a small single diesel could probably do a weeks worth of hauling on the same amount of fuel a 25knot boat uses in a day.

  • Anonymous

    Maine 456 is absolutely correct, run a yanmar diesel in a TJ28 and you will be amazed at the efficiency

  • Anonymous

    Don’t really know any “younger guys” who went under. While 1000 hp is a little much. A 32′ boat does not cut it in todays fishery.

  • Anonymous

    “That’s because fishermen realized that they could substantially reduce fuel consumption by switching to new diesel engines, she said.”
    Then I suggest they do it with their own freaking money.  

  • Anonymous

    Yanmar Diesels are not cut out for commercial work, and and a TJ28, or any 28 for that matter, will get you three or four months of fising inshore at the most. It takes a bigger boat to fish a longer season. Another point is some guys have figured out that if you put in a bigger engine and dont run it hard you can cruise at the same speed and burn less fuel than if you used a smaller engine and tried to cruise at that same speed. Just because they have 1000HP in the boat doesn’t mean they are burning 60gal/hr.

  • Anonymous

    I agree. This is the stimulus package at work.

  • Anonymous

    The USDA kept sending me information on grant money that was available to people in my line of work.  A lot of guys I know bought into it.  I would have no part of it.  If I can’t prosper through my own decisions and efforts, then I need to change the way I do things or find a new line of work.  I don’t need or want the government involved.

  • Anonymous

    This actually mandated by the EPA to get lower NOX emissions/soot particulate. They already mandated low sulfur diesel fuel. Engine refits have been going on for some time now. Its not much different than getting an old car off the road. You will find that the Feds are going to get involved whether you like it or not. They have their hands in every aspect of my shipboard operations. 

  • Anonymous

    I understand what you are saying.  The marine diesels that are available now have to meet emission standards that weren’t in place just under ten years ago.  My issue is with any type of grant program where public money is given to fishermen, or whoever, for whatever reason.  The diesel that I have now is no longer being manufactured because it could not be made to meet current emission standards, but I can still run it.  It’s just that when I go to replace it that I will have to either have it rebuilt, buy a rebuilt , or buy a new engine that meets the standards.  My point is that it’s my responsibility to pay for that upgrade, not other taxpayers.

  • Anonymous

    yanmar diesels are top notch I have been a diesel mechanic for over 25 years.  Have seen them in many applications they always pan out

  • Anonymous

    Rebuilding your engine may require it to remanufactured to a new standard if a certified kit is available. You may already know this but check out: http://www.epa.gov/otaq/regs/nonroad/marine/ci/420f09003.htm

    If it benefits us all for you to “clean up your act” (LOL) you shouldn’t feel like it is all your responsibility if they changed the rules on you midstream. Just my two cents. Take care.

ADVERTISEMENT | Grow your business

Marketplace Coupons

ADVERTISEMENT | Grow your business