POLL QUESTION

70 percent of Maine schools failing national standards

Posted Oct. 03, 2011, at 3:01 p.m.
Last modified Oct. 04, 2011, at 9:02 a.m.
Print this   E-mail this    Facebook this   Tweet this     

Poll Question

Education Commissioner Stephen Bowen.
Pat Wellenbach | AP
Education Commissioner Stephen Bowen.

Related stories

BELFAST, Maine — Camden Hills Regional High School graduates more than 90 percent of its students, sends them off to places such as Harvard University and consistently beats the state’s testing standards in reading, math, writing and science.

It’s also a failing school in the eyes of the federal government, joining other so-called failing schools such as Orono High School, Bangor High School and Hampden Academy. And that is a label that education officials, including Maine Education Commissioner Stephen Bowen, believe to be a strong example of why the national school accountability system simply does not work.

Under the strictures of the federal No Child Left Behind Act, less than 30 percent of schools in Maine are making adequate yearly progress as measured by student test scores and attendance, according to a report released Monday morning by the Maine Department of Education.

“I don’t like it. Who does?” said Superintendent William Shuttleworth of Five Town Community School District, which includes Camden Hills Regional High School. “When the average citizen first reads that, they say things must be troubled up there. But we’re one of the best schools in New England.”

The 2001 No Child Left Behind Act may have been designed to promote school accountability and teacher success. But the controversial law has had other consequences, one of which is a credibility gap when it comes to the annual results, Bowen said Monday afternoon.

Although the new report indicates that Maine schools have gotten much worse over the last year, the commissioner said that the state’s poor showing reflects problems with the federal accountability system and not necessarily with schools or students.

“If you’re saying that only 30 percent of schools in this state are making adequate yearly progress, well, that just doesn’t pass the straight-face test,” Bowen said. “We do need to have accountability. We do need to ensure that schools are getting kids to meet standards … But what you’re seeing all over the country is more and more schools considered to be failing, even if your school is making progress.”

Under No Child Left Behind, Maine schools must meet higher testing targets each year in order to make adequate yearly progress. The ultimate goal is to have 100 percent of students proficient in reading and math by 2014.

Shuttleworth and others who decry the use of a single standardized test to prove proficiency say that some students may be poor test takers who intend to go on to a trade school or into the work force. Some may be English language learners. Others may have learning disabilities or be receiving special education.

“You have to have very high — but reasonable — standards of achievement,” the superintendent said.

The 2011-12 status of schools’ progress is based on last year’s test results and targets. The target in reading, for instance, required 78 percent of all high school juniors to show proficiency. That target was 7 percentage points higher than the previous year.

In math, the target was 12 percentage points higher, with 66 percent of juniors needing to show proficiency.

At Camden Hills Regional High School, 63 percent of students tested proficient or better in reading and 62 percent were proficient or better in math, according to high school assessment results released by the Maine Department of Education on Monday.

This year, only 184 schools out of 608 in the state are considered to be making adequate yearly progress. Last year, 44 percent of the state’s schools made adequate yearly progress.

The number of schools that have not met targets for at least two years in a row, or “continuous improvement priority schools,” has increased from 137 last year to 223 this year, according to the Maine Department of Education.

Bowen said that the testing system is “demoralizing to schools.”

“You are essentially making a major determination about the quality of the school based on how well kids do on an assessment instrument given at one point in time each year, and that’s it,” he said. “It’s unfair to draw such a sweeping conclusion about a school based on one instrument.”

Last month, President Barack Obama announced a waiver program for states to opt out of testing thresholds outlined in No Child Left Behind, which Bowen said was a welcome move.

“It’s going to allow us to move away from that one snapshot model to try to get a more comprehensive picture of how well schools are doing,” he said.

The president’s plan would allow new flexibility in how schools measure student, teacher and administrator achievement; how schools develop programs designed to improve student achievement; and how schools use federal funding for innovative programming. In order to obtain a waiver from No Child Left Behind standards, states must develop plans to meet those assessment and curriculum goals.

Shuttleworth said that would be time very well spent. Right now, Maine is the only state to use the Scholastic Aptitude Test as a gauge of how its 11th-graders are doing, according to the Maine Education Association website.

“That test was never designed to be a test given to everybody,” the superintendent said, adding that it was intended to filter out the students who are ready for college.

But now all juniors in Maine, regardless of whether they plan to go on to college or not, are asked to take the test.

“The expectation is that unless there is catastrophic reason not to test a child, they must all take it,” Shuttleworth said.

A school’s test results are compared from year to year to determine if it is making adequate yearly progress.

“Maine has the highest bar of any state in America, I’d say,” the superintendent said.

If that bar isn’t met, the school is penalized. Camden Hills Regional High School must allocate a certain amount of money toward improvements such as redesigning curriculum and training staff.

“It’s disingenuous,” Shuttleworth said. “I’d rather put that money into opportunities so that those kids can be competitive in the world of work.”

Commissioner Bowen said that the state won’t be using the SAT as a benchmark forever. By 2015, Maine should have adopted a new common assessment for its schools which will be used by every state.

“The standards will be the same and the assessment instrument will be the same,” Bowen said. “For once, you’ll be able to compare across states.”

Until then, he hopes the president’s waiver program will allow Maine to have a more successful way to hold schools accountable without needing a temporary replacement for the SAT.

“The testing has given us some valuable information,” Bowen said. “It is important that we’re closing achievement gaps. The data’s been important. I think it has done some good things. But with this adequate yearly progress measure, you’ve set an unreachable goal, and what it’s led to is tremendous frustration in the schools.”

BDN writer Christopher Cousins contributed to this report.

Click here for Maine’s complete list.

Similar articles:

Marketplace News

Marketplace

Guidelines for posting on bangordailynews.com

The Bangor Daily News encourages comments about stories, but you must follow our terms of service.

In brief:

  1. Keep it civil and stay on topic
  2. No vulgarity, racial slurs, name-calling or personal attacks.
  3. People who harass others or joke about tragedies will be blocked.

The primary rule here is pretty simple: Treat others with the same respect you'd want for yourself. Here are some guidelines (see more):

  • http://twitter.com/OttolineMorrell MSG

    This isn’t just about accountability, it’s about extreme economic instability in Maine homes and school communities that are cutting staff like crazy trying to stay afloat..  

  • http://twitter.com/OttolineMorrell MSG

    This isn’t just about accountability, it’s about extreme economic instability in Maine homes and school communities that are cutting staff like crazy trying to stay afloat.

  • http://www.facebook.com/profile.php?id=1580171246 Kristy Blackwood

    Maybe the federal gov’t should start pumping money into the education funds versus taking it away; just maybe we would start to see a rise in the overall progress. As if it isn’t bad enough to double-dip into our senior citizens retirement/social security funds-they are subtracting federal funding that goes to empower our children’s education and future. 

    Home-schooling is starting to look better and better each year.

  • Anonymous

    Wrong it’s about school districts that continue to throw more and more money at the same terrible teachers – expecting a different result every year.  Maybe the State will look at the schools that ” can’t find a friend to consolidate with,” can’t afford any AP classes, always asking for money they think they are eligible for, and adding it into their budget before they even get it.  And then look at the fact that they didn’t meet ANY  standards and just shut them down.  The taxpayers of this Country, this State, and that town shouldn’t be financing a school that obviously is nothing but an over priced babysitter. Obviously there is no learning going on at all.

  • Anonymous

    Maybe a good indicator that children need to be taught in school, not coached to take a standardized testing. If teachers could go back to teaching the basics without having to spend all of their time teaching to the tests, maybe there would be a better educational system. I say do away with standardized testing completely. My parents and grandparents didn’t have standardized testing and they were highly educated.

  • Anonymous

    Why doesn’t the state get out of the education business? Our towns ran their own schools for decades before the state stuck their nose in and took over the education of youths in Maine.  No one complained of the level of their education before either(old timers). Education should not be run by the Government for obvious reasons. Let the towns and cities decide.

  • Anonymous

    Watch this space for the education empire demanding more money to continue doing a substandard job of teaching our students.  It’s just so unfair to expect the children to actually be able to pass a test that demonstrates their proficiency.  Unfair to the teachers.

    And always remember, It’s never about the children.

  • Anonymous

    Times are different. I’ll bet your parents and grandparents didn’t have a quarter of  the class medicated, another quarter of the students disrupting the class because they have behavior problems, another quarter of the class being removed for special services (OT,PT,Speech and resource room).  I don’t know any teacher who spends time teaching to a test, but…..if a test is suppose to measure what students should know, then what’s wrong with teaching them what they should know??  Standardized tests offer information that schools need to know in order to increase the awareness of its strengths and weaknesses.  They also help hold teachers accountable for student progress, or lack there of.  Do away with them, and anything goes.

  • Anonymous

    If you look at the data, funding for education has increased.  Throwing money into the system isn’t the answer to education.  Our society has changed dramatically.  The family has changed dramatically. That is where you should be looking, not for more money.

  • Anonymous

    Wasn’t  it GW Bush and his Republican Congress that stuck the federal government’s honking nose into how the towns run the schools, really ? 

  • Anonymous

    Check Article VIII of the Maine Constitution 1820

    http://maine.gov/legis/const/Constitution.pdf

    Section 1. Legislature shall require towns to support public
    schools; duty of Legislature. A general diffusion of the advantages
    of education being essential to the preservation of the rights and
    liberties of the people; to promote this important object, the
    Legislature are authorized, and it shall be their duty to require,
    the several towns to make suitable provision, at their own expense,
    for the support and maintenance of public schools; and it shall
    further be their duty to encourage and suitably endow, from time to
    time, as the circumstances of the people may authorize, all
    academies, colleges and seminaries of learning within the State;
    provided, that no donation, grant or endowment shall at any time be
    made by the Legislature to any literary institution now established,
    or which may hereafter be established, unless, at the time of making
    such endowment, the Legislature of the State shall have the right to
    grant any further powers to alter, limit or restrain any of the
    powers vested in any such literary institution, as shall be judged
    necessary to promote the best interests thereof.

    So, the State has always had the duty to ensure towns make “suitable provision” for education. If the legislature thinks tests help ensure that, they ahve a duty to require it.

    Also, towns are “government”. Keeping government out of education is like keeping government out of social security. Social Security like public education is “government”.

  • http://pulse.yahoo.com/_W3772AM5CL56CYRNKD4ELYMNEM Mainah Forevah

    While the “No child Left Behind” had good intentions it has failed horribly.  It has taken children that were performing above average and allowed them to be lazy and do nothing but wait for the others to try and catch up.  I am so sick of hearing it isn’t fair to the slower kids to group based on knowledge level.  Oh and don’t forget the crap about how the integrated classrooms help the slower kids catch up…it is a bunch of crap….1). It appears as if they catch up only because the advanced kids are NOT learning much and 2). It is not the advanced kids job to teach the other kids…that is the schools/teachers job. If the academically challenged kids increase their knowledge base by 50% then the advanced kids should have increased their base by that percent or more..ugh  Why do you think our children are now leaving high school not prepared for college?  Because 95% of their time in school was spent sitting around, not being challenged while the school systems spent all of their resources on the less academically gifted students.   The schools are doing well at focusing on these at risk kiddos but at a price of seriously neglecting the other students.  If we grouped based on knowledge level, the teacher could teach more, and the students would learn more. 

  • hasacluemaine

    A total of 68% of my property tax bill goes to edjukatun….LOL
    Money well spent, of this I am sure.

  • Anonymous

    I bet our children will get better test scores if we keep telling them it is alright to disrespect their teachers. We just have to keep telling them that their teachers don’t deserve the salaries they make. We have to let our children understand that when they fail to do their homework or to study for a test, it’s not their personal responsibility, it’s the fault of the teachers! 

  • Anonymous

    Throwing more money at the schools and reducing class size has been shown to be ineffective in raising  achievement levels.   We have to use different methods of teaching our children to read that meets their needs.   What we are doing is not working and we need to have accountability.   These are not stupid children.    Something is very wrong with our methods of instruction.   If our children cannot read they have been failed miserably.   Let’s focus on improving instruction and offering choices to improve performance.  Let parents go where the success rate is greatest and you will soon see improved instruction.

  • Anonymous

    maybe the fed should get out of education and leave it to the states. that and reducing the power of the unions would go a long way towards improving the education of our kids. paying ineffective teachers, and mandating that “all” children are entitled needs to end.

  • Anonymous

    Too bad schools seem to be more interested in testing and passing students (in the assembly lines of public education) than actually teaching them.

  • Anonymous

    No child left behind has been in effect for 10 years.

    If they had changed it to no child pushed through to the next grade until they masterd the skills needed to do the next grade level work. We would have one heck of a sophomore class in all our schools. None of them would be ‘functionaly illiterate’. The Colleges would be drooling to get these children into their programs with the knowlege that they would be ready and able to do college work. The trade schools would be just as happy to get students who could actually do basic  math and be able to read the technical manuals required to do the work required.

  • Anonymous

    The family has defiantly changed! My son is not is school yet but  I shutter for when he is. Both his father and I work full time 9-10 hour shifts……we barely have dinner together….how will I ever have time to help with home work?  My son lives like he is the product of a single parent home……

  • Anonymous

    There is nothing, zero, zilch, wrong with an education in Maine now, nor in the past thirty years.

    Again this is just a political agenda looking for a problem and someone to blame for  lack of economic progress in this state. The failures of our economy in Maine is a direct result of politicians who represented this state at the local and national level over the past 30 years, both the reds and blues.

    The State of Maine work force has a strong brand for a superior, hard working, motivated, smart work force, when there are jobs for them to go to.

    We don’t need a better educational system but a better economic picture which our politicians have only ruined.

    The educational system is the same system that has produced a place to live where the majority of Maine can leave their doors unlocked, the lowest crime rate anywhere, where we take care of those less fortunate, where there is safe air to breath and safe water to drink. Maine has produced as many famous people as any State, as well CEOs,  lawyers, doctors, nurses, small business owners, soldiers, farmers,etc.

    But we need an savvy business, wheelers and dealers, who know how to attract private investors and private businesses, which we have not had for 30 years.

  • Anonymous

    You sound like you think that not all children deserve to be in the classrooms. Perhaps we should go back in time when kids with a certain IQ level were not educated or if they were they were taught in a separate school and never allowed to mingle with children in mainstream education? 

    I educated my children at home for about eight years. We never had tests, they never took standardized tests of any sort. The first written test that they took was for the driving permit and then when they took the GED pretest. They all aced their driving tests and scored so high on the GED that they did not need to do any preparation work. They took the real test and scored above average. Not bad for kids that never had to take tests. 

    Standardized tests provide no useful information that cannot be obtained by the watchful eye of a teacher.  If a good teacher is paying attention, they know whether a child is on target or not. We are an incredibly diverse country with so many cultures living together within the same country. We are a huge country geographically and each part of this country is unique. We have hundreds of languages being spoken in the home, thousands of children being the first in their families to learn English. We have children at different levels of cognitive function and ability. There is no way that a national, standardized test can take into consideration all of the differences in our students and give any useful information. 

    The one thing that we have learned from these standardized tests is that they are not working, they are not accurately assessing the learning abilities and achievement of the multicultural children of this country.

  • Anonymous

    i agree with the majority of your post, but not the first sentence. the education system could use some improvement, namely the need to allow alternatives to the government run warehouse concept. all children are not equal and should not be treated the same,. from those who sadly spend their day waiting for the teacher to move on to new material, to children with no desire to learn who spend their day disrupting the class and other students learning. federal mandates that handcuff teachers and administrators, and  unions that protect ineffective teachers add costs that should go to rewarding excellence in  teachers who are effective.

  • Anonymous

    It sounds like you missed my point. Oh well, I can explain it to you, but I can’t understand it for you.

  • Anonymous

    Bush believed that if schools were going to receive federal money, they should have to show results.  Too many inner cities were performing way below standards and yielded a high number of drop outs. The intent was to make schools/teachers accountable for tax payers’ money.  Now, we have the federal government (under Obama) designing national tests and a national curriculum. As usual, it’s all tied to money. We’re being held hostage by the feds……

  • Anonymous

    News flash!  It isn’t the schools, it’s the government.

  • Anonymous

    So now, even if they are above average, they have to improve every year, too ? 

    To bad that doesn’t apply to Republican pols, too.

  • Anonymous

    As being closely involved with one of the small school that made AYP this year, I can say while it is nice not to be “on the list”, it is a complete sham.  We have worked hard to teach our students.  We have always worked hard to do this.  The NCLB and AYP program was a failure in providing any meaningful data as to school performance.  Schools, regardless of size, should be looking more closely  at growth per student over the course of a year than did this year’s sixth grade do a little better than last years.  With this trend of massive lists of failing schools happening throughout the nation, schools will be battered with some new form of punitive review.  I have no problem with testing to make sure that students are making progress.  I just feel that we need to look at the student in the best possible way, not the worst.  

  • http://pulse.yahoo.com/_7T3YNF6MG3FPEAVTFIJC44VQUI Dlbrt

    No child left behind was designed to fail!

    When you mandate that all students be above average, what do you expect?

  • Anonymous

    I’m  glad I found the illusive “poll question”. Why it has to disappear some days is a big mystery. I refrain from commenting about the article.

  • http://pulse.yahoo.com/_JEEBL24CJFPKONGDGBVLUF44LU Violet

    It is time to get rid of the “Everyday Math Curriculum” in Maine . . .  it circles around and circles around and leaves the child and parent both baffled and confused . . . .there is no emphasis on mastering the basics of mathematics . . . in the 7th grade, many children in my son’s class  cannot comprehend long division . . . lots of wordy problems with language found (in my day . . . 20 years ago)  in college textbooks . . . this is without the basics behind them and NO examples. . . .they should be starting pre-algebra by now!!!!!   it is so frustrating and we are now seriously thinking about homeschooling because of this horrible math program.

  • Anonymous

    You are the one missing the point.

    Go visit a classroom or two and tell me that 4th graders in Maine right now aren’t being totally taught to take the dang tests next month.

  • Anonymous

    If Bowen et al know that hte current testing method is a big portion of the problem with showing Maine kids making progress, then why wait 3 years to change the flawed testing model designed by the previous Education Commissioner who is heading up the company looking to get the new testing contract?  How would you do if tested after 30 days on a job on knowledge known to take a year to learn?  That is what the current fall testing, awarded to the same company that provided the famous MEA, is doing.  There are several lower priced options with fast turn around time, such as Scholastic or CTB-McGraw-Hill.  Why the delay in dumping a bad test?  

  • Anonymous

    One of the reasons why we began homeschooling back in 1998 was because there were more words in their math books than numbers. We used your old fashion math books, you know, the kind that had numbers in it. The math curriculum now is so watered down and is leaving children bored and confused. 

  • Anonymous

    Wasn’t it GW Bush and his Republican Congress that stuck the federal government’s honking nose into how the towns run the schools, really ?     
    **********************************************
    ahh, actually I think it was J E Carter and his Democrat Congress who started federal govt. intervention in local education.

  • Anonymous

    So now, even if they are above average, they have to improve every year, too ?
    ***************************************************
    Is there some reason we cannot have a 100% literacy rate in this state or in this country?

  • Anonymous

    The federal government started getting involved in the late 50s and early 60s when they were concerned that other countries were making technological advancements more quickly than we were so they began changing the educational system and morphed into what it is today. Started before Carter and altered the most by Bush.

  • Anonymous

    I don’t think you explained your points as well as TrueNative explained her points.  I think she got your point(s) and responded very clearly and articulately.

    It is quite obvious that this emphasis on “teaching to the test” is not working for students or teachers.

  • http://pulse.yahoo.com/_SCNJPPZDX7GEYELESV2YGQFLN4 Pat T. Riot

    I’d like to see everyone who comments on this article take the SAT and be required to score above average before they could submit a comment. 

  • Anonymous

    The only thing that is  “quite obvious” ( aside from your assuming to know what someone else understands) is that you don’t know what you are talking about!  How much time have you spent in a classroom?  

  • Anonymous

    Or, “News flash, it isn’t the schools or the government.  It’s the breakdown of the American family and community.”

  • Anonymous

    What if it’s neither the schools nor the government, but the breakdown of the American family and community?

  • Anonymous

    The federal government started getting involved in the late 50s and early 60s when they were concerned that other countries were making technological advancements more quickly than we were so they began changing the educational system and morphed into what it is today. Started before Carter and altered the most by Bush.     
    ******************************************************
    not quite… here’s some information:  (from wiki, sorry)

    Establishment

    A previous Department of Education was created in 1867 but soon was demoted
    to an Office in 1868.[3] As an agency not represented in the
    president’s cabinet, it quickly became a relatively minor bureau in the
    Department of the Interior. In 1939, the bureau was transferred to the Federal Security Agency,
    where it was renamed the Office of Education. In 1953, the Federal Security
    Agency was upgraded to cabinet-level status as the Department of Health,
    Education, and Welfare.

    Upgrading Education to cabinet level status in 1979 was controversial and
    opposed by many in the Republican Party, who
    saw the department as unconstitutional, arguing
    that the Constitution doesn’t mention education, and deemed it an
    unnecessary and illegal federal bureaucratic intrusion into local affairs.
    However many liberals and
    Democrats see the department as constitutional under the Commerce
    Clause, and that the funding role of the Department is constitutional under
    the Taxing and Spending
    Clause.

    On March 23, 2007, President George W. Bush signed into law H.R.
    584, which designates the ED Headquarters building as the Lyndon Baines Johnson
    Department of Education Building.[2]
    —————————————————-
    Bush didn’t so much as drastically alter it rather  he expanded it’s authority.  It’s too bad Reagan couldn’t get the Cabinet Departmentdismantled as he wanted to.

  • Anonymous

    Once again, really good comments!

    There is much room for improvement in our educational system.  There are some students who do well, as always, and go on to good colleges, community colleges, trade schools,etc.  However, there are way too many students, as we know, who are not benefitting (for various reasons) from the way teaching is now structured.
    By home schooling , you can be more creative (and teach the basics as well) and tailor the teaching to the student……their strengths and those areas that are not as strong. But, home schooling is not for many, so it is necessary(crucial) that the schools reevaluate and stay with what is working and make changes in those areas which need improvement.

  • Anonymous

    Requires federal approval under NCLB

  • Anonymous

    Shuttlesworth?  Really? Another retired double-dipper in his sixties leading Maine into the future.

  • Anonymous

    That wasn’t true everywhere.  In New York we had State Regents, it didn’t matter whether you lived in some small town in upstate New York or out on Long Island, you were given the same test

  • Anonymous

    Well, there has to be a way for teachers to be held accountable for what  they can or cant do in a class room. Of course I could mention many ways this could be done, but I personally do not believe that there is a one fix it all solution. Do tests shed some light on teacher performance…I think so……but it is also not enough to determine much at all. I really hope that the state works out a way to better understand and work out this issue with Maine edu. I know that my parents had to teach me how to finish my homework or even give complete lessons to get the jist of what was to be done. I learned much more from teachers at the college I attended in my first year then I did in my entire HS lifetime. For a time I thought it was me, but clearly it was a combination of things……..(did not expect to get much out of HS teachers as well as my attitude of that idea it shed on me.) I have a 3.6 gpa ….in HS I was lucky to pass a class with a TRUE C..which probably should of been a D.. Come on teachers!! Have a little more desire to actually educate.

  • Anonymous

    Thank you for this informative article. Hopefully Commissioner Bowen will have some success in patching up the mess that Susan Gendron left with her bureaucratic mandates and insane use of the SAT and lead the state in working to improve real educational opportunities for students not just meeting standardized testing goals.

  • Anonymous

    This article makes me grateful for about the 4000th time that we homeschool. We have 100% literacy in reading and math above the 3rd grade. We do test every year and find that all the children score above the 88th percentile. Even looking at the best curriculum in the state of Maine, I can’t find better books and lessons than the ones we are using. The children use Saxon Math, start diagramming sentences in 3rd grade, learn Latin vocabulary, play the piano starting at age 7, and read constantly.

    The reason homeschooling succeeds is the Harry Truman quote, “The buck stops here,” applies in full force. There is no blame game going on like there is in the public school: parents blame the teachers, teachers blame the administration and the parents, and the children take no responsibility for their own education at all. If my kids don’t master reading comprehension, learn to write a logical essay, solve an algebra problem, understand scientific principles and significant events in world history than it is both my fault and the child’s, not anyone else’s so it is in both our best interest to work all the harder to master those concepts. I taught in public school in both the best and the worst schools in Virginia and I vowed back then never to put my own children in public school because very little learning takes place each day. I saw too many children avoiding doing work and too many teachers putting in days just to collect their check. 

  • Anonymous

    Geeesh,…..You mean that MILLIONS of dollars invested in laptops diddn’t help the little sweeties?????
    Why not increase property taxes more?

  • Anonymous

    Does not surprise me in the least. The food we feed our children, ( with all the perservatives added) the lack of gym in school (one year for all the years of high school in Presque Isle) the access to cell phones and texting and the amount of drugs the kids are now on. The teachers are being pushed to teach all the children the same and they are not the same as twenty years ago.

  • Anonymous

    ROBthePUBLICans got just what they asked for…a way to get school vouchers for upper middle class parents to be able to send their kids to the private schools of their choice…NCLB was created with impossible goals in place so that all schools would eventually “fail” (some sooner than others) and part of the penalties for being a “failing” school is that parents can send kids to private schools of their choice and not pay the tab. 

    Only that doesn’t work to well in Maine where private schools are 100 miles apart. And for those who will claim “Dems voted for it too”…Yeah, they did, because ROBthePUBLICans would have smeared them as “voting against education”. This was a joke 10 years ago and it is even worse today.Maine should tell the feds to keep the PALTRY amount the federal government provides schools in Maine and in return do away all federal rules and regulations which have become nightmares for Maine schools…and while we’re at it, crumple up the SAT as a measure that that fool Baldacci and his minion Gendron (yeah, blasting the Doofus Dems here as I’m an independent) and kick that out of the state. The SAT does ONE thing…Its score provides you with a prediction of a student’s potential success at a 4 year college or university AND THAT’S IT!!!! It is NOT (and the College Board people who cooked this test up will AND DID tell Maine this) an accurate indicator of a student’s knowledge or ability. There are plenty of intelligent Maine kids who do NOT do well on the SAT but will be fairly successful in life because they are spending a good portion of their high school life working toward a technical career. 

  • Anonymous

    You’re absolutely right about Everyday Math. I’m glad my son is autistic, so he has an IEP in place that allows him to go to the special ed room and learn from the “regular” math book in there (you know, one with actual numbers and stuff). He is better in math than my other son, because he has the basics. It’s sort of sad that going to the “special ed” room is the only way some kids might actually succeed.

  • Anonymous

    The title of the program guarantees failure.  Some children *will* be left behind, due to physical or mental disability.  By definition, approximately half of the human race has below-average intelligence . . .

  • http://pulse.yahoo.com/_7T3YNF6MG3FPEAVTFIJC44VQUI Dlbrt

    No child left behind , leaves teachers and schools behind!

    Not all kids learn the same or have the same abilities.

    Unfortunately some are destined to be the menial laborers in society.

       When all the manufaturing jobs have left the country to go to third world counties where there is a Flood of illiterate people willing to do these jobs for pennies on the dollar there becomes no job offerings in America for these kids when they grow up!

    Its the “Corporations” Leaving these kids behind not the Teachers!

  • Anonymous

    They should teach drivers ED with a standard also.

  • http://pulse.yahoo.com/_DJHNJADSITO5PW2V6YT7I5IEPU W

    socialist style education has failed.  time to privatize education completely.

  • http://pulse.yahoo.com/_WKBQQOX73E4FANNQD22UKYZFQ4 bilbo52398

    NCLB was a cooperative effort of the late Sen. Ted Kennedy and President George W. Bush. I understand that the president wanted accountability for the use of federal funds, but nationalized standards and a one-size-fits-all approach does not work. Nice ideal to have, but the design and execution have been awful. Time to end NCLB!

  • http://pulse.yahoo.com/_PV4CYCJTMR72D2GJP7KHVMCURU charles

    Why not just teach the test and the hell with all else. Teaching them the test will bring up the scores and that is what they want, not a population with knowledge. Most of the bums in Washington would not get elected if people knew how to do research on them, and not watch the ads on the tv. Not all students care about school and if they do not care about it they will not put much effort into it.

  • Anonymous

    We are to busy teaching test standards to our children at both the state and federal levels that there is no time for real education.  Reading writing and arithmetic and history and geography just look at the map issued from the Whitehouse while the President was out west.

  • http://pulse.yahoo.com/_PV4CYCJTMR72D2GJP7KHVMCURU charles

    I’m sorry but a 10th grade education is all you need to enter college, this is sad. I quit school in the 10th grade and am now back in school after many, many years. I left after getting lost in a system that did not work. Too large of a class, rowdy classmates that ruled the classroom not the teachers. It is really sad that a person in their late forties can come back after so many years and get decent grades, when in high school did so poorly.

  • Anonymous

    If you want a child to succeed everyone has to put effort into this.  These students are the next genertation.  It’s not just up to the schools, parents need to be involved, get retired grandparents looking for something to do. Start at the elementarty school in order for a child to succeed they have to know basic skills work with these kids one on one.   If you see a child is failing you allready know how they will do on these tests.  Get these kids prepared  for these national tests. All kids want to learn.   I have done this, takes time and effort but to see a child smile when then finially learn the concept makes me feel good to knowing I made a difference, and having all these students prepared they all did very well on the national  test.

  • Anonymous

    Maine is in the top 10% of US schools. I do not believe this article. I do think the tea partiers want to privatize schools and then cheat on tests. 

  • dan

    “Standardized tests provide no useful information that cannot be obtained by the watchful eye of a teacher.  If a good teacher is paying attention, they know whether a child is on target or not. ”

    “The one thing that we have learned from these standardized tests is that they are not working, they are not accurately assessing the learning abilities and achievement of the multicultural children of this country. ”

    I almost fully agree but STANDARDIZED TEST are FAILING ALL children – no standardized test is made for all children: the poor, the rich, the multicultural child, the single parent child, the abused child and so on  – are the children that are loosing out the most – just look in the classrooms and you will see that – a standardized test shows us nothing, but waste time and energy!

  • Anonymous

    Oh, but wait–aren’t all the children above average?  That’s what they keep telling me.

    And why can’t you keep getting better, year after year, forever?

    Aren’t all the women strong, aren’t all the men good looking?

    Don’t we live in a perfect world?

  • Anonymous

    I agree, but not in all schools. Camden Hills hasn’t cut anything that I know of. Our taxes keep going up but our school isn’t willing to sacrifice like us taxpayers are forced to do. That school has special programs for “stressed students” like yoga classes and a massage therapist to help keep the students calm. Not exactly what is necessary to help prepare them for the stress of the real world and workplace. In all my years of employment, I have not once had a professional massage offered by my employers, nor have they ever allowed time out of the day for yoga.

    Some programs I would like to see cut first and foremost before firing a good teacher would be the yoga program, the message program and many sports that are offered. I know not all schools pamper their students to the extreme of Camden Hills, but somebody is paying for all that extra pampering while many local taxpayers are scared of losing their jobs and homes.

  • Anonymous

    Given the reality of learning disabilities, I doubt it. 

    So do all stocks increase 2.5 % each quarter ? 
    Which ones ? 
    Is there no upper limit on performance with dogmatic conservative theories ? 

    So when are the Bush Tax cuts going to start creating jobs and end the Bush Recession ? 
    Oh, happy days, then, huh ? 

  • Anonymous

    Thank you comrade councilor.

  • Anonymous

    Thank you comrade councilor.

  • http://pulse.yahoo.com/_3VZPF2TP35HZNYEOY7NCBI6UKQ Mary Magnuson

    We are using a 19th century education model in the 21st century.  Most classes could easily be taught on UTube with one very excellent teacher reaching millions across the nation.  Kids could call up the lesson as many times as they need to comprehend the material.  What is even better, they would never have to leave home except for brief periods of testing and be overseen by monitors.  Our education system is completely obsolete and expensive without the needed results.  When the government socially engineered us into two income families, the schools became default day care centers which is not their purpose.  Just another unintended consequence that has failed the entire country.  As for mingling kids – the day care concept eliminated the ability to segregate kids that were disruptive to the education of the many.  One disruptive kid can cause a whole days lesson to be ruined and no time to repeat it.  Some segregation is needed for the good of the whole – except we can’t do that because mom and dad are both working and need the schools to take care of their kid till they get off work – and then they are too tired to work with their kid to help improve his chances for an education.  But the tax receipts are worth it – right?

  • Anonymous

    Maine’s culture did not depend culturally on higher education. Logging, fishing and farming didn’t require a Masters in Physics, if you will. That has been changing in recent generations and we are in transition. It could take a couple more generations to reform our culture. It doesn’t mean we’re stupid, just a different focus. We may have to go through the bath salts phase before we’re specialists in semi-conductors and genetic engineering.

  • Anonymous

    NCLB was designed to eventually show nearly every school as failing. 

    The American education establishment, which I call the Government Education Complex richly deserved this little trick being played on it because it has – for decades – hidden its extreme cost and incompetence from parents and citizens.

    The problem is that it didn’t work.  Entire states were left to game their tests, lower standards, screen out substandard students, and generally do what the Complex does – lie to citizens and then demand more money for its failed, but burgeoning bureaucracy.

    Now that the Obama administration is once again allowing another class of “waivers,” the game begins again.  It is allowing these waivers as long as the state complies with moving to the federalized “Race to the Top” common core testing regime.

    This is not all bad, but it has nothing to do with allowing more “local” or state control.  It is about completing the nationalization of education.

    If you are for that, then these new waivers help you down that path.  If you are for more local control, please disabuse yourself of the notion that Maine’s recently consolidated districts dancing to the Federal tune are the answer.  They are not.

    Districts are merely franchises of the Government Education Complex.  They are are tool to force Federalization using local tax dollars to finance the move.

    If you want local control, the only way to get its to personalize control through having money follow the child to better alternatives. (Charters, vouchers, and digital learning options on a course-by-course basis)

    Wake up folks.  Your “local” school is about a local as McDonald’s franchise, and this new waiver is merely sugar coating to get you to swallow the Common Core Testing pill.

    Fund Children, not districts, bureaucracies, unions, and other engines of government waste.

  • Anonymous

    Are you a teacher? Or when is the last time you actually looked at the curriculum or lack of curriculum at any school in Maine especially those North of Bangor? I graduated from a regular non -Maine public high school in the 70′s .   The curriculum was well beyond what my daughter is getting in Maine public high school in the year 2011! And still you wonder why 70% flunked? I’m surprised that 30% passed!

  • Anonymous

    Sad thing is … that is exactly what they are doing and the kids are still flunking the test. Time to wipe out the staffs, put discipline back in the schools, and put standards used in different states in place here… 3 of your kids flunk you don’t have a job next year. That will weed out the teachers just staying there to collect their free insurance when they retire!

  • Anonymous

    This is the only rational outcome of attempting to standardize a process which is anything but standard. 

  • Anonymous

    Not going to read through all the BS that I am sure is posted here, but the problem is Parents.  Parents are more interested in their pending divorce and new BF or GF, how good their great white hope is going to be in sports, being their kids best friend, making sure their kid has the coolest cloths and newest technology.  If I were a teacher I wouldn’t waste my time with a bunch of brats who don’t have a fing clue.  Focus on the kids who want to learn.  Implying that those who haven’t decided to learn by high school, probably never will.

  • Anonymous

    And what’s so darn wrong with being the product of a single parent home?

  • Anonymous

    If you think this kind of adversity helps the child grow and become more self reliant, then I guess it’s a good thing. Some studies I have heard says it does. But overall there really is a dearth of good parenting from all forms of parental figures these  days. It would be nice if parents could spend more time with their children like Shannonanigans was stating.

  • Anonymous

    Well as long as Bowen is going to continue expanding our reliance on Federal Dollars, we will have this problem. As of now, we are turned over to the Fed the set of standards we use to determine proficiency, our choice of curriculum, our methods of assessment, the qualifications for teachers … what next. We have consolidated schools to the point where local control has become a myth. And for what? Has any of this improved our student’s results as a whole?

  • Anonymous

    Throwing money at the problem is not the answer.Building giant new tourist attractions for schools is not the answer either.Putting money in the classroom through tools like computers and anything to do with students.Also vetted teachers that want to teach.I am sure i will get spanked for this but unions protecting bad teachers does not help . Maybe spending more time teaching the basic’s instead of political  indoctrinating and social agenda’s .Maybe a  full  day in school instead of 6 hours a day how about at least 8 like working.

  • honey777

    I don’t think we can lay all of the blame on the educational system.  Teachers are not allowed to give consequences for misbehavior in the classroom.  Until parents are willing to back up teachers instead of defending their kids, there are few consequences for inappropriate and classroom-disrupting behavior.  And until some parents start paying attention to their kids and teaching them appropriate public behavior instead of medicating the hell out of them, nothing is going to change. 
      I think a mandatory class needs to be added to every high school curriculum: a parenting class that teaches why ignoring, striking, and yelling at your kids can damage their ability to focus in school and to have healthy relationships with others.
       

  • Anonymous

    So strengthens the point of why we homeschool.  I would hope more people would start looking into this option.

  • Anonymous

    LOL…and based on your commanding grasp of the written English language, it’s no wonder they are failing the ‘dang’ tests!

    I mean, like, who actually writes ‘totally’ in a sentence…like, c’mon….that’s just so lame. 

  • Anonymous

    Perhaps I’m being too sensitive, and if so – I apologize.  I understood Shannonanigans to be saying that ‘oh my how awful… my son’s growing up as if he had only one parent’.  It appeared she was suggesting that single parents don’t have time for their children and having two parents was some sort of guarantee of good parenting.  With me and my two children (who are now successful happy adults), that was not the case.

  • Anonymous

    Like everyone else in this world, students rise to the level of expectation. Teachers should teach from the curriculum using methods that work for students of varied levels. Teaching to a test will never work because it is piecemeal, at best. Some lessons can be taught in isolation, but most learning takes place of time in units. One of the best teaching methods is team teaching in which teachers of each subject area come together to show how knowledge is connected.

    No school should ever accept standardized test results as the means to evaluate students or teachers. When standardized test results are used to judge, several districts in other states have found that answers are being changed. Don’t blame the teachers for this as administrators have also been implicated.

    Set a high level of expectation and let teachers teach.

  • Anonymous

    How is it sad that a 40 year old shows the maturity to get good grades?  It would be pathetic if you couldn’t.

  • Anonymous

    And you expect more!!! Why???The system is built to fail students, it’s built to protect educational jobs and pensions only.. Truth doesn’t always feel good….

  • Anonymous

    That speaks volumes about your daughters.  In today’s day and age there is an advanced curriculum and the teachers are busy teaching your daughters remedial curriculum.  Maybe you should try to help them at home to catch up to their classmates.

  • Liberal Soup N Crackers

    Abolish the Federal Dept. Of Education and start controlling your own local schools.

  • Anonymous

    No need to apologize. Thank you for clarifying. It wasn’t my intention to b ae know it all or to state the obvious.  I am sure the quality of parenting does not always depend on the quantity of parents. However, it may help to have two parents so one can be the bread winner and the other can keep an eye on the children. Sadly it is difficult to do this at this point in time. In my own experience I have known traditional, two parent, households who either worked or didn’t care abou their child. Poor upbringing is becoming such a problem these days it seems to be symptomatic of where the country is at. It is good to hear your children have grown into fine adults, just wish that story was a more prevelant one. Thank you for your reply.

  • Anonymous

    This made me chuckle. I make my living as a writer/photographer. The newspaper and magazine editors that I have written for over the years have had no problem with my command of the English language. I’ve been blessed to make a living by using my “inept” grasp of the English language.

  • Anonymous

    Nothing! I grew up in a single parent home. I am married and hoped for more for my son. When you are in a single parent home your parent has less time to be with you since they are the only providers. Parents always want more for their children then what they got don’t they?

  • Anonymous

    Thanks! I didn’t mean any harm! Single parents are tough and do the best for their kids!

  • Anonymous

    I spent the day in a classroom just yesterday. That is where I made the observation.

  • Anonymous

    hahah free insurance?  What world are you living in?  Don’t talk until you work in a school and actually know what is going on…All talk, but you have no idea!  Maybe parents should discipline their children more so teachers aren’t spending 90% of their day doing a PARENT’S JOB!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!  Right- you are one of those parents-”Lollipopaddict” we all know who you are, making teacher’s jobs harder!  You don’t like how teachers work or “don’t work” come into a school for 1 hour and see how “glamorous” teaching is!!!  You wouldnt even make it an hour! 

  • Anonymous

    What school, what grade? I spend every day in the classroom. We’re testing this week, NECAPS. I don’t know any teacher at my school who has been “teaching” to the test. There isn’t time to do that and meet the demand of the curriculum. I suppose every school is different, so please don’t paint us all with your broad brush.

  • Anonymous

    Too young to know ’bout Eisenhower, (R. POTUS ) ? 

  • Anonymous

    You and your Bund are very welcome, I’m sure. 

ADVERTISEMENT | Grow your business

Marketplace Coupons

ADVERTISEMENT | Grow your business