POLITICS

Redistricting committee still stuck in partisan rut, so Legislature to decide issue

Posted Aug. 30, 2011, at 11:36 a.m.
Last modified Aug. 30, 2011, at 5:39 p.m.
Print this   E-mail this    Facebook this   Tweet this     
Michael Friedman of Bangor, chairman of the Reapportionment Committee.
Pat Wellenbach | AP
Michael Friedman of Bangor, chairman of the Reapportionment Committee.

AUGUSTA, Maine — The bipartisan state commission responsible for redrawing Maine’s congressional district lines voted narrowly Tuesday to recommend to the full Legislature the Democrats’ latest plan, but lawmakers will see the Republicans’ preference, too.

Neither is likely to get the two-thirds support needed in the Legislature, which means the matter would be decided by the state’s supreme court, something that has happened each of the last two times the state has undertaken this process.

“When I was asked to do this, I was probably naive,” said Michael Friedman, the commission’s chair and the only independent on the panel. “How difficult would it be to draw a line? It’s only 4,300 people out of 1.3 million. I thought I could do it on a weekend. I was wrong.

“I couldn’t get the donkey and the elephant to move a stitch, even though I tried. But I remain an optimist because whatever happens today, it’s not the end of the road.”

Maine political leaders were tasked earlier this year with redrawing the line separating the state’s two congressional districts in order to reflect with updated U.S. Census data. Based on the 2010 figures, the 1st District now has 8,669 more residents, which means roughly half of that number must be shifted to the 2nd District.

Democrats and Republicans serving on the state’s congressional redistricting commission have been working separately since early July to come up with scenarios but the process grew increasingly partisan once they had to share ideas.

Party members all cast votes for their own plans on Tuesday, leaving Friedman as the tiebreaker.

The Bangor attorney supported the Democrats’ plan, dubbed the “Vassalboro-Gardiner plan,” which shifts the Kennebec County towns of Gardiner, Vassalboro, Vienna, Rome and Unity Township into the 2nd District and moves Oakland and Wayne into the 1st District in order to achieve the population deviation of one.

The plan, the third attempt by the Democrats, would affect nearly 20,000 voters but splits only Kennebec County, which already is divided between the 1st and 2nd Districts.

Both parties’ plans were constitutionally sound, Friedman said, but in his opinion, less movement was better. The Democrats’ plan moves fewer communities and voters from one district to another and still meets all the other statutory criteria.

Republicans released their latest map on Tuesday, a plan that shifts Androsoggin County from the 2nd District to the 1st but keeps the coastal counties of Lincoln, Sagadahoc and Knox — including U.S. Rep. Chellie Pingree’s hometown of North Haven — in the 1st.

GOP members on the commission said that plan was “a hand across the table” to the Democrats.

However, once the vote was taken, Sen. Debra Plowman, R-Hampden, indicated that her party would send the original Republican plan to the full Legislature as a minority report.

That plan, dubbed the “Western Maine plan,” moves Lincoln, Knox and Sagadahoc counties from the 1st District to the 2nd District and moves Oxford and Androscoggin counties from the 2nd to the 1st. Additionally, Kennebec County would be contained in the 2nd District and Franklin County would be divided between the two.

Among other things, the GOP plan would shift one-quarter of the state’s voters from one district to the other and would put Pingree’s hometown of North Haven squarely in the 2nd District.

Despite working for the last two weeks to move away from their original plan, Republicans said Tuesday that the initial plan still makes the most sense.

“I don’t like the status quo because it rejects all possibilities,” Plowman explained. “In our plans, we mix it up. … That creates an added value. I want to see possibilities. I want to see [a representative] shake the hands of a mill worker instead of an art gallery owner.”

However, while Friedman said the original Republican plan probably deserves more consideration, it also represents a “dramatic” shift that had little chance of becoming reality.

Both sides agree that there is no perfect line. Friedman conceded that each party was trying to engage in some form of gerrymandering: The Democrats for protecting the status quo and their two sitting House members, and the Republicans for trying to shift more GOP voters into the 2nd District.

Friedman also acknowledged the sentiment of some members of the public who spoke last week about the partisan nature of the process and the lack of independent voices.

“Sometimes we lose sight of the fact that Maine voters get it,” he said. “Down deep most [Mainers] are independent.”

Maine’s 125th Legislature will convene for a special session Monday, Sept. 27, in an attempt to settle the matter.

Although the Legislature will consider the recommendations of the redistricting commission, Friedman pointed out that a different plan ultimately could emerge.

“I would not be surprised if that happened,” he said.

Commission member Kenneth Fredette, a Republican House member representing Newport, said there was no chance the Legislature would pass the Democrats’ plan with a two-thirds vote.

“It probably won’t pass the Republicans’ plan either,” he said. “My fear is that, as we move forward, one side will look to the court to solve this problem and not to the Legislature. That’s unfortunate. We passed a two-thirds budget in difficult times; I think we can do the same with this process.”

Some members of the Republican caucus, including Plowman, talked about the Legislature needing only a simple majority vote on congressional redistricting. If that’s true, the Republicans hold advantages in both the House and Senate, which means they could push through their plan.

Interestingly enough, that same Legislature this year passed a resolution proposing an amendment to the Constitution of Maine to require two-thirds of each legislative branch to approve congressional redistricting proposals.

Because that involves changing the state’s constitution, Maine voters must weigh in. That won’t happen until November, though, long after the Legislature makes its decision on redistricting.

The two parties are expected to continue talking in the weeks leading up to the special legislative session in hopes of avoiding a court battle and avoiding a fight over two-thirds versus simply majority support.

“Sen. Seth Goodall and I, as friends and colleagues, have agreed to meet again in a

couple of days. We will start with points of agreement and work toward a Congressional redistricting plan that makes sense for all of Maine, not two Maines, and not for one part of Maine at the expense of another,” Plowman said.

Similar articles:

Marketplace News

Marketplace

Guidelines for posting on bangordailynews.com

The Bangor Daily News encourages comments about stories, but you must follow our terms of service.

In brief:

  1. Keep it civil and stay on topic
  2. No vulgarity, racial slurs, name-calling or personal attacks.
  3. People who harass others or joke about tragedies will be blocked.

The primary rule here is pretty simple: Treat others with the same respect you'd want for yourself. Here are some guidelines (see more):

  • Anonymous

    hold the line republicans and break it up as close as possible by population.Hopefully sending the other maine to mass or new hampshire who cares.

  • Anonymous

    The Democrats have a plan with the same population deviation of one that the Republicans have. But Republican Representative Fredette said that didn’t “cut the mustard”. So, obviously the population argument is false.

  • http://pulse.yahoo.com/_SHNOU64ZBOBIKWUF5IM6WSH7WA entitled4life

    And because they have the plan that has the same deviation, we should accept their plan instead of the republicans plan, why??

  • Anonymous

    BOTH  the democrat and republican plans are politically motivated, as has been the case with redistricting from day one…and that’s everywhere, not just Maine. Why would anyone expect anything different this time around? The only difference this time is that the dems aren’t in full control of Augusta, so they can’t just shovel this through as they have in the past. Hey, that’s life!

  • R Shaffer

    The Republican plan is better by good government standards, so it should be approved. The Democrat plan just touches up the borders of the disastrous gerrymander they engineered over the last 40 years – it must go if we are to have fair and potentially competitive elections. 

  • Anonymous

    The large argument had been that of population. Fredette admitted that that argument is moot  when the Democrats came up with a population deviation the same as the Republicans. The argument that the present districts are gerrymandered is false: they have been court mandated. 
    Unfortunately the Republicans are not being forthcoming by failing to show us (the public)  their alternatives.
    My argument for redistricting is for equal travel distance within the districts while allowing for population equality and compactness. I don’t know if the Republicans have accomplished this as compared to the Democrats as I have not seen the latest Republican plan which to all accounts looks to take this into consideration.
    Which plan do you prefer and why (without taking into account population – that is cleared up – or gerrymandering – which can be said same for the republican plan)?

  • Anonymous

    Please site and define “Good Government Standards”. Thank you. PS The argument that the present districts are gerrymandered is false: they have been court mandated.

  • Anonymous

    Much indeed to be regretted, party disputes are now carried to such a length, and truth is so enveloped in mist and false representation, that it is extremely difficult to know through what channel to seek it. This difficulty to one, who is of no party, and whose sole wish is to pursue with undeviating steps a path which would lead this country to respectability, wealth, and happiness, is exceedingly to be lamented. But such, for wise purposes, it is presumed, is the turbulence of human passions in party disputes, when victory more than truth is the palm contended for.

    GEORGE WASHINGTON, letter to Timothy Pickering, Jul. 27, 1795

  • Anonymous

    Much indeed to be regretted, party disputes are now carried to such a length, and truth is so enveloped in mist and false representation, that it is extremely difficult to know through what channel to seek it. This difficulty to one, who is of no party, and whose sole wish is to pursue with undeviating steps a path which would lead this country to respectability, wealth, and happiness, is exceedingly to be lamented. But such, for wise purposes, it is presumed, is the turbulence of human passions in party disputes, when victory more than truth is the palm contended for.

    GEORGE WASHINGTON, letter to Timothy Pickering, Jul. 27, 1795

  • Anonymous

    Does anyone know what the vote has to be in order to pass the redistricting bill?  2/3′s maybe?

  • http://www.facebook.com/people/Edward-Lachowicz/100000535475609 Edward Lachowicz

    You should go back in time and take up your “gerrymandering” issue with the people who drew the county lines, because the current districts only divide one county. A squiggly line does not a gerrymander make. Cue Iñigo Montoya re: “inconceivable” here.

  • Anonymous

    According to the article above, yes 2/3 need to vote in favor of the redistricting plan for it to pass.

    This will go to the courts again, as it has the last few times. Redistricting is always partisan, and honestly I don’t see either side as being right or wrong here, both are looking to service their political agendas.

  • Anonymous

    If you read the article above, you’ll learn that it’s not been shoveled through even when the democrats controlled the legislature— it’s gone to the courts because 2/3 need to vote in favor of the plan.

  • Anonymous

    If you read the article above, you’ll learn that it’s not been shoveled through even when the democrats controlled the legislature— it’s gone to the courts because 2/3 need to vote in favor of the plan.

  • Anonymous

    If you read the article above, you’ll learn that it’s not been shoveled through even when the democrats controlled the legislature— it’s gone to the courts because 2/3 need to vote in favor of the plan.

  • Anonymous

    Our country is sinking in world prominence, mired in economic distress, and the politicians are as petty and sniping and compromising as ever.  Real surprise.

  • Anonymous

    Our country is sinking in world prominence, mired in economic distress, and the politicians are as petty and sniping and compromising as ever.  Real surprise.

  • Anonymous

    Our country is sinking in world prominence, mired in economic distress, and the politicians are as petty and sniping and compromising as ever.  Real surprise.

  • Anonymous

    Our country is sinking in world prominence, mired in economic distress, and the politicians are as petty and sniping and compromising as ever.  Real surprise.

  • Anonymous

    Our country is sinking in world prominence, mired in economic distress, and the politicians are as petty and sniping and compromising as ever.  Real surprise.

  • Anonymous

    Our country is sinking in world prominence, mired in economic distress, and the politicians are as petty and sniping and compromising as ever.  Real surprise.

  • Anonymous

    Both plans break it up as close as possible by population.

    I know it’s fun to talk tough about “sending the other maine to mass or new hampshire”, but I’d rather not see how northern/downeast Maine gets by without the tax revenues from southern/midcoast Maine.

  • Anonymous

    Reading the amendments it still looks like not until 2021 does 2/3 go into affect for congressional districts.Hard to understand the ifs and buts of it.Looks like a classic court case to me either way.

  • Anonymous

    Reading the amendments it still looks like not until 2021 does 2/3 go into affect for congressional districts.Hard to understand the ifs and buts of it.Looks like a classic court case to me either way.

  • Anonymous

    Reading the amendments it still looks like not until 2021 does 2/3 go into affect for congressional districts.Hard to understand the ifs and buts of it.Looks like a classic court case to me either way.

  • Anonymous

    Reading the amendments it still looks like not until 2021 does 2/3 go into affect for congressional districts.Hard to understand the ifs and buts of it.Looks like a classic court case to me either way.

  • Anonymous

    Any republican who votes for the dem. plan can plan to be voted out!

  • Anonymous

    Agreed, Its a “I will see you in court scenario.

  • Anonymous

    The Republicans continue to claim that it is the Democrats who are being unreasonable.  I am fine with the Courts deciding this whole issue. 

  • Anonymous

    “I don’t like the status quo because it rejects all possibilities,” Plowman explained. “In our plans, we mix it up. … That creates an added value. I want to see possibilities. I want to see [a representative] shake the hands of a mill worker instead of an art gallery owner.”

    This is without a doubt the dumbest thing I have ever heard. What part of “representative” is lost on you?

  • Anonymous

    There would be a lot less bickering if the two sides were not so ideologically far apart. One party, the Republicans are attempting to achieve fiscal sanity. The other side wants to spend like Imelda Marcos in a shoe store. Can’t agree? Go figure!

  • Anonymous

    There would be a lot less bickering if the two sides were not so ideologically far apart. One party, the Republicans are attempting to achieve fiscal sanity. The other side wants to spend like Imelda Marcos in a shoe store. Can’t agree? Go figure!

  • Anonymous

    There would be a lot less bickering if the two sides were not so ideologically far apart. One party, the Republicans are attempting to achieve fiscal sanity. The other side wants to spend like Imelda Marcos in a shoe store. Can’t agree? Go figure!

  • Anonymous

    I say vote out all the damn republicans and democrats. Can you tell I’m an independent?

  • Anonymous

    I say vote out all the damn republicans and democrats. Can you tell I’m an independent?

  • http://pulse.yahoo.com/_SHNOU64ZBOBIKWUF5IM6WSH7WA entitled4life

    Well its the democrat plan that was picked along partisan lines even though we are told this commission was non partisan.  It was stacked with democrats and please, don’t tell me Mr Friedman is an independent.  So the dems are still trying to shovel this through and as usual, they have done a great job of painting the republicans as the bad guys and the dems as the good guys.  Maine people do not get it.

  • http://pulse.yahoo.com/_SHNOU64ZBOBIKWUF5IM6WSH7WA entitled4life

    Anything a republican says is the dumbest thing you have ever heard.

  • Anonymous

    What is this talk of moving people? No one will be moved, unless when the redistricting is finally done someone doesn’t like their new district enough to move, I can’t imagine that happening.

  • Anonymous

    There has been no compromizing, except for, maybe, a couple cases of compromizing their beliefs

  • Anonymous

    I’d like to see anyone in office more than two terms voted out, especially at the Federal level.

  • Anonymous

    I’d like to see anyone in office more than two terms voted out, especially at the Federal level.

  • Anonymous

    I’d like to see anyone in office more than two terms voted out, especially at the Federal level.

  • Anonymous

    ” . . . which means the matter would be decided by the state’s supreme court, something that has happened each of the last two times . . .”

    So much for blaming the *current* district boundary on one party or the other.  Neither side would budge on the last two tries.

    Party politics is gonna kill this country.

  • Anonymous

    I’ve got one better, “Why should illegal immigrants be made into criminals?”

  • Anonymous

    I don’t rember the courts drawing the districs, just mandating that the Democrat plan be used.

  • Anonymous

    I don’t rember the courts drawing the districs, just mandating that the Democrat plan be used.

  • Anonymous

    I don’t rember the courts drawing the districs, just mandating that the Democrat plan be used.

  • Anonymous

    The “Princess Bride”? How long have uou been saving that for?

  • Anonymous

    The “Princess Bride”? How long have uou been saving that for?

  • Anonymous

    Of course you do realize that having the courts decide the issue is the same as having the Democrats decide, don’t you?

  • Anonymous

    When was the last time that either party had a 2/3 majority the legislature? Long, long time. when was the last time that a single party had a 2/3 majority in the legislature and the governor’s office? Long, long, long, time. In all that time, redistricting was done by 2/3 majority, which meant a compromise. Either party had a veto, and so both parties had to get together and talk, almost as if they were adults.
    But now, the republicans have a majority, and a governor who got elected on the basis of a ticket split between Cutler and Mitchell. What’s their next move? Of course, let’s go with the Nuclear Option, and pass redistricting on a simple majority.
    This is a good idea, IF the republicans really think that they will be in the majority from now on. Otherwise, when the world turns, there’s Payback.

  • Anonymous

    The “Other” Maine? Which Maine is that? Last I heard, there was only one Maine. If there’s two, you maybe better ought to get on it, because we must be entitled to another couple of Senators…

  • Anonymous

    I remember well the good old days of Guv. Jim Longley, who came up with a brilliant scheme for fiscal prudence. He simple didn’t pay the bills for the last six months of his term. 
    More or less what Jocko did, before he went on to his current prominent dealings. 

ADVERTISEMENT | Grow your business

Marketplace Coupons

ADVERTISEMENT | Grow your business