Report: Maine woods can support heavier logging

Posted Aug. 19, 2011, at 8:32 p.m.
Last modified Aug. 20, 2011, at 7:35 a.m.
Print this   E-mail this    Facebook this   Tweet this     

ELLSWORTH, Maine — A new report commissioned by the state suggests that Maine can significantly increase logging of softwood trees over the next 20 years, providing a boost to the wood products industry while still maintaining a healthy, sustainable forest.

The report, prepared by the James W. Sewall Co. in Old Town for the Department of Conservation, states that past timber harvesting practices and the spruce budworm outbreak in the 1970s and 1980s led to a large crop of spruce and fir rapidly reaching maturity from an economic standpoint.

The company suggests that Maine could steadily ratchet up logging to the point where, by the end of the 20-year period, crews are harvesting 64 percent more spruce and fir than today without harming the state’s “inventory” of commercial spruce-fir forests.

The independent report’s finding didn’t come as a surprise to staff within the Maine Forest Service.

“What they are saying about where we are today definitely matches the way we see it, and what they say about where we are going matches the modeling we are doing in-house,” said Dave Struble, the state entomologist.

Timber and forest products are part of Maine’s second-largest industry, after tourism. Logging trends in the Maine woods often are reflected in the health of the national economy and, in particular, the housing market. So it is no surprise that the amount of softwood trees harvested in Maine has dipped in recent years — by as much as 25 percent over the decade.

The Sewall report states that, over the past 10 years, the rate of harvesting of spruce and fir has roughly kept pace with the rate of growth. But as the crop of maturing trees increases over the next 20 years, so will the amount of marketable wood.

“Maine’s spruce/fir forest is entering a phase when growth rates per acre will increase each year through 2030,” Doug Denico, Maine state forester, said in a statement. “A growing, stable supply of spruce/fir bodes well for investment and jobs in our forest industry.”

The report suggests raising the harvesting rate from the current three-year low to the 10-year average, which would represent a 15 percent increase to 4.8 million tons of wood.

“Harvest can be further increased to 7.8 million tons by the end of the 20-year period while still maintaining standing inventory of total spruce-fir growing stock at current levels,” reads the report. “This reflects an increase of 64 percent over the period.”

Perhaps the biggest reason for Maine’s crop of healthy, maturing spruce and fir was the budworm outbreak from 30 years ago that killed enormous numbers of trees or prompted landowners to increase their harvesting, some by massive clear-cutting.

Of course, the spruce budworm is a cyclical pest that already is causing some problems in Quebec and eventually will return to Maine. Struble said it is “inconceivable to me that we will not have an outbreak … over the next 20 years.”

So could increased logging hurt Maine’s forests if the budworm re-emerged as a problem?

Struble said active management of the land to maintain a more diverse and mixed-age forest actually can help reduce the impact of the budworm because the pests prefer what the industry considers older or overmature trees. And contrary to its name, the spruce budworm actually prefers fir over spruce.

“If we keep forests younger and keep the percentage of fir down,” Struble said, “although we will still be susceptible [to budworm] we would not be as vulnerable.”

Of course, trees are only harvested when there is a market for the wood, whether for lumber or paper products. So the report’s suggestion that Maine could increase its timber harvesting is dependent on both the recovery of the housing market and a thriving papermaking or pulp industry.

Similar articles:

Marketplace News

Marketplace

Guidelines for posting on bangordailynews.com

The Bangor Daily News encourages comments about stories, but you must follow our terms of service.

In brief:

  1. Keep it civil and stay on topic
  2. No vulgarity, racial slurs, name-calling or personal attacks.
  3. People who harass others or joke about tragedies will be blocked.

The primary rule here is pretty simple: Treat others with the same respect you'd want for yourself. Here are some guidelines (see more):

  • Anonymous

    Yes fly everyone over so they can see for themselfs.

  • Anonymous

    Wow, really? A study ordered by the state? Really?

  • Anonymous

    No one should tell Jonathan Carter.  He is probably getting petitions ready to ban clear cutting even as you read this article.

  • Anonymous

    No one should tell Jonathan Carter.  He is probably getting petitions ready to ban clear cutting even as you read this article.

  • Anonymous

    No one should tell Jonathan Carter.  He is probably getting petitions ready to ban clear cutting even as you read this article.

  • Anonymous

    No one should tell Jonathan Carter.  He is probably getting petitions ready to ban clear cutting even as you read this article.

  • Anonymous

    No one should tell Jonathan Carter.  He is probably getting petitions ready to ban clear cutting even as you read this article.

  • Anonymous

    No one should tell Jonathan Carter.  He is probably getting petitions ready to ban clear cutting even as you read this article.

  • Anonymous

    No one should tell Jonathan Carter.  He is probably getting petitions ready to ban clear cutting even as you read this article.

  • hasacluemaine

    Well taht is great, but the story did not delve into the economics of the situation. Is there a demand for more wood? What industriews need more wood? Would increased harvesting bring down the price of wood and what impact would that have on the industry? It seems as though the study just says, “Yup, we got a lotta wood out there”.

  • hasacluemaine

    Well taht is great, but the story did not delve into the economics of the situation. Is there a demand for more wood? What industriews need more wood? Would increased harvesting bring down the price of wood and what impact would that have on the industry? It seems as though the study just says, “Yup, we got a lotta wood out there”.

  • hasacluemaine

    Well taht is great, but the story did not delve into the economics of the situation. Is there a demand for more wood? What industriews need more wood? Would increased harvesting bring down the price of wood and what impact would that have on the industry? It seems as though the study just says, “Yup, we got a lotta wood out there”.

  • hasacluemaine

    Well taht is great, but the story did not delve into the economics of the situation. Is there a demand for more wood? What industriews need more wood? Would increased harvesting bring down the price of wood and what impact would that have on the industry? It seems as though the study just says, “Yup, we got a lotta wood out there”.

  • hasacluemaine

    Well taht is great, but the story did not delve into the economics of the situation. Is there a demand for more wood? What industriews need more wood? Would increased harvesting bring down the price of wood and what impact would that have on the industry? It seems as though the study just says, “Yup, we got a lotta wood out there”.

  • hasacluemaine

    Well taht is great, but the story did not delve into the economics of the situation. Is there a demand for more wood? What industriews need more wood? Would increased harvesting bring down the price of wood and what impact would that have on the industry? It seems as though the study just says, “Yup, we got a lotta wood out there”.

  • http://pulse.yahoo.com/_H42QFRNGIVG36JTIS536PFBLS4 Brian

    I agree with hasacluemaine, until there is a real demand for the wood products, things will not change. It will end up being another report sitting on a shelf at the DEP collecting dust.

    Perhaps an overactive hurricane season or more tornado’s in the heartland will bring about demand. But then the next issue is competing against “Oh Canada”!

    THE DEVIL IS IN THE DETAILS.

  • Anonymous

    The tree huggers won’t like this report !

  • Anonymous

    After all is said and done softwood (and hardwood as well) is a crop just like wheat except for a 60 to 1 harvest time ratio.  I remember hiking west from a campsite on the Allagash into a hugh clear cut that was like walking out of Bourbon Street into downtown New Orleans. The trees grow back and the cycle renews. The tree-huggers should be worried about the Plastic not the Wood.

  • Anonymous

    I have walked through 25 year old clear cuts and was surprised at the ability of nature to renew itself. One of my favorite trout streams has wild trout again.( I wouldn’t mind a further set back though)

  • Anonymous

    James W. Sewall Co., the same company guiding Roxanne Quimby on her quest for a National Park in the Maine Woods,  am I the only one seeing a conflict of interest here?

ADVERTISEMENT | Grow your business

Marketplace Coupons

ADVERTISEMENT | Grow your business