EDITORIALS

Downgrading Congress

Posted Aug. 09, 2011, at 9:43 p.m.
Print this   E-mail this    Facebook this   Tweet this     
A statue of former Treasury Secretary Albert Gallatin stands guard outside the Treasury Building in Washington, Monday, Aug. 8, 2011, as stocks slid Monday amid a rout in global stocks after Standard & Poor'’s downgraded the U.S. credit rating.
Jacquelyn Martin | AP
A statue of former Treasury Secretary Albert Gallatin stands guard outside the Treasury Building in Washington, Monday, Aug. 8, 2011, as stocks slid Monday amid a rout in global stocks after Standard & Poor'’s downgraded the U.S. credit rating.

It is true that the downgrading of the U.S. credit rating by Standard & Poor’s is a wake-up call to Congress to get serious about the federal budget — as if they needed more evidence that their recent efforts have been pathetic. However, the rating must be kept in perspective.

First, the downgrade, from AAA to AA+, doesn’t mean the U.S. can’t pay its bills. Rather, the S&P made it abundantly clear that the ratings decline was due to the agency’s skepticism about Congress, not the U.S. economy.

“The downgrade reflects our opinion that the fiscal consolidation plan that Congress and the [Obama] Administration recently agreed to falls short of what, in our view, would be necessary to stabilize the government’s medium-term debt dynamics,” S&P wrote in a statement last week.

In April, the agency warned that it was considering a credit downgrade, the first in the nation’s history. The situation in Washington has only gotten worse.

“Since then, we have changed our view of the difficulties in bridging the gulf between the political parties over fiscal policy, which makes us pessimistic about the capacity of Congress and the Administration to be able to leverage their agreement this week into a broader fiscal consolidation plan that stabilizes the government’s debt dynamics any time soon,” S&P said.

Sen. Olympia Snowe was more blunt during a visit with the Bangor Daily News on Monday. The lack of progress in Congress “doesn’t match the gravity of the times,” she said.

She points out that Congress and the president had months to craft a deal to raise the debt ceiling. A bipartisan commission offered a reasonable plan last December which mixed spending cuts with tax change. Instead, a deal only came at the 11th hour. The same was true with a spending resolution to avoid a government shutdown earlier this year. And, of course, Republicans — who were vocal with their concerns with spending and the deficit — could have done something when they controlled Congress and the White House, but instead voted repeatedly to raise the debt ceiling.

Frustration with Congress’ lack of seriousness was echoed by prominent economists who came to Grand Lake Stream for a fishing getaway last week.

“This is a sad day for the United States when the political machinations of the morons in Washington — with the House and the Senate, Democrats and Republicans equally accountable and guilty — bring the United States of America to the point where a rating agency takes away our AAA designation,” said David Kotok, who is with Cumberland Advisors of Sarasota, Fla., and the organizer of the annual economist retreat at Leen’s Lodge.

“That did not happen because we lack the ability to pay,” he said. “That happened because of 535 members of Congress who failed their constituents.”

Another Grand Lake visitor, Barry Ritzholtz, CEO of FusionIQ in New York and the man behind the influential “Big Picture” financial blog, pointed out that Japan has had a lower rating than the U.S. for years.

And what of the integrity of S&P ratings anyway? Mr. Ritzholtz pointed out that S&P and other credit agencies helped create the real estate lending debacle that triggered the global recession. Now that agency is downgrading the U.S. credit rating.

The agencies gave AAA ratings to mortgage securities that later became worthless. S&P also maintained its top rating of Lehman Brothers, the larger investment firm, as the company collapsed.

“So these people are now pronouncing on the creditworthiness of the United States of America?” economist and New York Times columnist Paul Krugman asked Sunday.

So, is the S&P any more accurate now? Time will tell.

This is not to say the U.S. doesn’t have serious financial concerns. The national debt is too high. Government spending needs to be cut — in thoughtful ways, not across-the-board or through a balanced budget amendment. Entitlement spending needs to be reduced. And the tax system needs to be reformed well beyond eliminating tax breaks for corporate jets.

The most disheartening part of the S&P downgrade memo is its lack of faith in Congress, a sentiment shared by the public. It is Congress’ job to write budgets for the federal government. If they don’t do this job — which they haven’t for nearly three years — no one else can step in and take over the task. It simply doesn’t get done and the public suffers through huge drops in the stock market which, at least temporarily, wipe out large portions of retirement savings — and likely increases in interest rates — which will make mortgages more expensive.

It didn’t take a ruling for S&P, which may or may not be accurate, to show that the U.S. economy needs a lot of work. The downgrade and the market drop must convince lawmakers that, when they return to Washington, they must tackle these serious problems and come up with real solutions, not just plans to put off the hard work for a few more years.

Similar articles:

Marketplace News

Marketplace

Guidelines for posting on bangordailynews.com

The Bangor Daily News encourages comments about stories, but you must follow our terms of service.

In brief:

  1. Keep it civil and stay on topic
  2. No vulgarity, racial slurs, name-calling or personal attacks.
  3. People who harass others or joke about tragedies will be blocked.

The primary rule here is pretty simple: Treat others with the same respect you'd want for yourself. Here are some guidelines (see more):

  • Anonymous

    I loved the ironic flight to treasuries yesterday, following the downgrade. Let’s be honest: where else are you going to invest? Isle of Man bonds? Anything in the Euro Zone?

    Not that anyone should take the group that labeled worthless CDOs “AAA” seriously anyway…

  • Anonymous

    Thank U W for driving us in the ditch. Thank U B. Hussein O. for driving us over the cliff!

  • newportres

    Why is it that a balanced budget is a good thing for every level of government except Federal?

  • Anonymous

    Don’t forget to thank Collins and Snowe – the Thelma and Louise politicians that are texting with no hands on the wheel.

  • Anonymous

    Oh, all those responsible for the downgrade of our credit rating are more than likely to get re-elected because there is no bipartisan effort to hold them responsible.

  • Anonymous

    A funny thing about polls our Congress people and the electorate. At the moment Congress is at its lowest approval rating in history. (14%) But individual Congresspeople are not being held responsible. In the same survey the average Congressperson has an approval rating of 56% from their constituents.

  • Anonymous

    Wow—you are reading my mind cheesecake1955! It’s as if the majority of people in the US are saying, “my congressperson is great—yours is a loser.”

  • Anonymous

    This Editorial was at least balanced, Loons from one wrong side, being critisised by another Loon.

  • Anonymous

    This Editorial was at least balanced, Loons from one wrong side, being critisised by another Loon.

  • Anonymous

    This Editorial was at least balanced, Loons from one wrong side, being critisised by another Loon.

  • Anonymous

    This Editorial was at least balanced, Loons from one wrong side, being critisised by another Loon.

  • Anonymous

    This Editorial was at least balanced, Loons from one wrong side, being critisised by another Loon.

  • Anonymous

    This Editorial was at least balanced, Loons from one wrong side, being critisised by another Loon.

  • Anonymous

    This Editorial was at least balanced, Loons from one wrong side, being critisised by another Loon.

  • Anonymous

    This Editorial was at least balanced, Loons from one wrong side, being critisised by another Loon.

  • Anonymous

    It is easy to blame the Presidents, they deserve a small part of the blame, but Congress deserves more blame.

    Ultimatly, WE THE PEOPLE, deserve most if the blame. WE have allowed our EMPLOYEES to run OUR business into the ground.

  • Anonymous

    Because WE believed it.

  • Anonymous

    This has been pointed out for decades.

    GB Shaw once pointed out that; if you rob Peter to pay Paul, Pall will always agree with the robbery.

    The problem is that WE are both Peter and Paul, the ones doing the robbing are the only ones that make a profit.

  • Anonymous

    This has been pointed out for decades.

    GB Shaw once pointed out that; if you rob Peter to pay Paul, Pall will always agree with the robbery.

    The problem is that WE are both Peter and Paul, the ones doing the robbing are the only ones that make a profit.

  • Anonymous

    This has been pointed out for decades.

    GB Shaw once pointed out that; if you rob Peter to pay Paul, Pall will always agree with the robbery.

    The problem is that WE are both Peter and Paul, the ones doing the robbing are the only ones that make a profit.

  • Anonymous

    The problem is not the lack of BIPARTISAN efforts, The raising of the debt and the Federal debt were both done with bipartisan effort. We need nonpartisan efforts.

  • Anonymous

    Exactly!!

  • Anonymous

    delete

  • Anonymous

    When the people fear their government, there is tyranny-
    When the government fears the people, there is liberty
    Thomas Jefferson

    Experience hath shown, that even under the best forms of government
    those entrusted with power have, in time, and by slow operations,
    perverted it into tyranny
    Thomas Jefferson

    A growing number of people no longer trust our leadership-

    Flush em all, but the ones that survive must take a pay cut, and receive no benefits or pension…!

    .

  • Anonymous

    When the people fear their government, there is tyranny-
    When the government fears the people, there is liberty
    Thomas Jefferson

    Experience hath shown, that even under the best forms of government
    those entrusted with power have, in time, and by slow operations,
    perverted it into tyranny
    Thomas Jefferson

    A growing number of people no longer trust our leadership-

    Flush em all, but the ones that survive must take a pay cut, and receive no benefits or pension…!

    .

  • Anonymous

    When the people fear their government, there is tyranny-
    When the government fears the people, there is liberty
    Thomas Jefferson

    Experience hath shown, that even under the best forms of government
    those entrusted with power have, in time, and by slow operations,
    perverted it into tyranny
    Thomas Jefferson

    A growing number of people no longer trust our leadership-

    Flush em all, but the ones that survive must take a pay cut, and receive no benefits or pension…!

    .

  • Anonymous

    Government spending does not need to be cut.

    As Larry Summers has said, if he could have gotten congress to agree to more fiscal stimulous, he would have.

    Taking money out of the economy is not the way to increase growth.  Even the Tea Partiers know this.  Ask them why it’s a bad idea to raise taxes and they’ll tell you it would take needed money away from investors.  Cutting spending also takes money out of the economy.

    The reason the stock market is in crash mode is because the debt ceiling deal takes trillions of dollars out of the economy, and all of the discussion since has been about how to take more money out of the economy.

    There will be a time to cut spending and raise taxes.  Now is not the time.

  • Anonymous

    Government spending does not need to be cut.

    As Larry Summers has said, if he could have gotten congress to agree to more fiscal stimulous, he would have.

    Taking money out of the economy is not the way to increase growth.  Even the Tea Partiers know this.  Ask them why it’s a bad idea to raise taxes and they’ll tell you it would take needed money away from investors.  Cutting spending also takes money out of the economy.

    The reason the stock market is in crash mode is because the debt ceiling deal takes trillions of dollars out of the economy, and all of the discussion since has been about how to take more money out of the economy.

    There will be a time to cut spending and raise taxes.  Now is not the time.

  • clamcove

    Time to put some adults in Congress, folks who understand responsibility and its obligations. They enacted ObamaCare, exempted themselves, paid themselves handsomely, opted out of EEO obligations and set themselves up with fancy, easily earned pensions. But they haven’t done the job. The place is a mess. Where is Reagan when we need him?

  • Anonymous

    Haha..the decline of America has started.  The rating should be FFF.  I’m going to go grab some popcorn and watch from a distance as this country crumbles like Rome.

  • Anonymous

    Why is S&P so secretive. Who runs that joint? There is no spokes person but quotes galore. Why oh why a lot of inquiring minds want to know who “they” is.

  • http://profiles.google.com/sdemetri Stephen Demetriou

    The republican’s not doing anything about the deficit when they have the means to legislatively do so is a pretty clear indication of their priorities, and their priorities have much less to do with the deficit than with grabbing power. Using the debt and deficit debates to this end gave them leverage to revile the black president conservatives hate, but also to push their decades old agenda to roll back the New Deal. It has been ALL shameless politicking at the expense of the unemployed, the elderly and the poor. 

    There was a good post on Brad DeLong’s blog yesterday that gave some insight as to what the administration is thinking (or not thinking)…

    http://delong.typepad.com/sdj/2011/08/how-should-obama-answer-the-stock-markets-wake-up-call-we-need-different-cossacks-department.html

  • http://profiles.google.com/sdemetri Stephen Demetriou

    The republican’s not doing anything about the deficit when they have the means to legislatively do so is a pretty clear indication of their priorities, and their priorities have much less to do with the deficit than with grabbing power. Using the debt and deficit debates to this end gave them leverage to revile the black president conservatives hate, but also to push their decades old agenda to roll back the New Deal. It has been ALL shameless politicking at the expense of the unemployed, the elderly and the poor. 

    There was a good post on Brad DeLong’s blog yesterday that gave some insight as to what the administration is thinking (or not thinking)…

    http://delong.typepad.com/sdj/2011/08/how-should-obama-answer-the-stock-markets-wake-up-call-we-need-different-cossacks-department.html

  • http://profiles.google.com/sdemetri Stephen Demetriou

    The republican’s not doing anything about the deficit when they have the means to legislatively do so is a pretty clear indication of their priorities, and their priorities have much less to do with the deficit than with grabbing power. Using the debt and deficit debates to this end gave them leverage to revile the black president conservatives hate, but also to push their decades old agenda to roll back the New Deal. It has been ALL shameless politicking at the expense of the unemployed, the elderly and the poor. 

    There was a good post on Brad DeLong’s blog yesterday that gave some insight as to what the administration is thinking (or not thinking)…

    http://delong.typepad.com/sdj/2011/08/how-should-obama-answer-the-stock-markets-wake-up-call-we-need-different-cossacks-department.html

  • http://profiles.google.com/sdemetri Stephen Demetriou

    The republican’s not doing anything about the deficit when they have the means to legislatively do so is a pretty clear indication of their priorities, and their priorities have much less to do with the deficit than with grabbing power. Using the debt and deficit debates to this end gave them leverage to revile the black president conservatives hate, but also to push their decades old agenda to roll back the New Deal. It has been ALL shameless politicking at the expense of the unemployed, the elderly and the poor. 

    There was a good post on Brad DeLong’s blog yesterday that gave some insight as to what the administration is thinking (or not thinking)…

    http://delong.typepad.com/sdj/2011/08/how-should-obama-answer-the-stock-markets-wake-up-call-we-need-different-cossacks-department.html

  • http://profiles.google.com/sdemetri Stephen Demetriou

    Obamacare… do you mean the Romney/Heritage Foundation’s answer to our health care crisis? I thought you like conservative ideas… what gives? Are you going back, or just confused?

  • http://profiles.google.com/sdemetri Stephen Demetriou

    Obamacare… do you mean the Romney/Heritage Foundation’s answer to our health care crisis? I thought you like conservative ideas… what gives? Are you going back, or just confused?

  • http://profiles.google.com/sdemetri Stephen Demetriou

    Obamacare… do you mean the Romney/Heritage Foundation’s answer to our health care crisis? I thought you like conservative ideas… what gives? Are you going back, or just confused?

  • http://profiles.google.com/sdemetri Stephen Demetriou

    Krugman has a great explanation for how the market is behaving that looks at expected future performance… pretty darn bleak. Check out the first two entries to his blog…

  • http://profiles.google.com/sdemetri Stephen Demetriou

    Krugman has a great explanation for how the market is behaving that looks at expected future performance… pretty darn bleak. Check out the first two entries to his blog…

  • http://profiles.google.com/sdemetri Stephen Demetriou

    Krugman has a great explanation for how the market is behaving that looks at expected future performance… pretty darn bleak. Check out the first two entries to his blog…

  • http://profiles.google.com/sdemetri Stephen Demetriou

    Krugman has a great explanation for how the market is behaving that looks at expected future performance… pretty darn bleak. Check out the first two entries to his blog…

  • http://profiles.google.com/sdemetri Stephen Demetriou

    Krugman has a great explanation for how the market is behaving that looks at expected future performance… pretty darn bleak. Check out the first two entries to his blog…

  • http://profiles.google.com/sdemetri Stephen Demetriou

    Krugman has a great explanation for how the market is behaving that looks at expected future performance… pretty darn bleak. Check out the first two entries to his blog…

  • honey777

    No idea.  But if there WAS a balanced budget amendment, who do you think would be the first to suffer if there was another war and billions had to be spent?  Certainly not big oil and corporate America. 

  • honey777

    No idea.  But if there WAS a balanced budget amendment, who do you think would be the first to suffer if there was another war and billions had to be spent?  Certainly not big oil and corporate America. 

  • honey777

    No idea.  But if there WAS a balanced budget amendment, who do you think would be the first to suffer if there was another war and billions had to be spent?  Certainly not big oil and corporate America. 

  • honey777

    No idea.  But if there WAS a balanced budget amendment, who do you think would be the first to suffer if there was another war and billions had to be spent?  Certainly not big oil and corporate America. 

  • honey777

    No idea.  But if there WAS a balanced budget amendment, who do you think would be the first to suffer if there was another war and billions had to be spent?  Certainly not big oil and corporate America. 

  • honey777

    No idea.  But if there WAS a balanced budget amendment, who do you think would be the first to suffer if there was another war and billions had to be spent?  Certainly not big oil and corporate America. 

  • http://profiles.google.com/sdemetri Stephen Demetriou

    Maybe it just goes to show that some individual voters in the states are not very bright, and that the collective consciousness has it under better wraps. 

    Statistically the collective consciousness is probably more correct, but I’m speculating…

  • http://profiles.google.com/sdemetri Stephen Demetriou

    Maybe it just goes to show that some individual voters in the states are not very bright, and that the collective consciousness has it under better wraps. 

    Statistically the collective consciousness is probably more correct, but I’m speculating…

  • http://profiles.google.com/sdemetri Stephen Demetriou

    Maybe it just goes to show that some individual voters in the states are not very bright, and that the collective consciousness has it under better wraps. 

    Statistically the collective consciousness is probably more correct, but I’m speculating…

  • http://profiles.google.com/sdemetri Stephen Demetriou

    Maybe it just goes to show that some individual voters in the states are not very bright, and that the collective consciousness has it under better wraps. 

    Statistically the collective consciousness is probably more correct, but I’m speculating…

  • http://profiles.google.com/sdemetri Stephen Demetriou

    Maybe it just goes to show that some individual voters in the states are not very bright, and that the collective consciousness has it under better wraps. 

    Statistically the collective consciousness is probably more correct, but I’m speculating…

  • newportres

    Eveything else we do manages to take war ans other states of emergency into account but for some reason you honestly believe we wouldn’t be able to do it in the case of a balanced budget amendment?
    Wow!
    This might actually be the best way to force the President to get approval from congress when he commits our troops to the next idiotic venture.

  • newportres

    Eveything else we do manages to take war ans other states of emergency into account but for some reason you honestly believe we wouldn’t be able to do it in the case of a balanced budget amendment?
    Wow!
    This might actually be the best way to force the President to get approval from congress when he commits our troops to the next idiotic venture.

  • newportres

    Eveything else we do manages to take war ans other states of emergency into account but for some reason you honestly believe we wouldn’t be able to do it in the case of a balanced budget amendment?
    Wow!
    This might actually be the best way to force the President to get approval from congress when he commits our troops to the next idiotic venture.

  • newportres

    Eveything else we do manages to take war ans other states of emergency into account but for some reason you honestly believe we wouldn’t be able to do it in the case of a balanced budget amendment?
    Wow!
    This might actually be the best way to force the President to get approval from congress when he commits our troops to the next idiotic venture.

  • newportres

    Eveything else we do manages to take war ans other states of emergency into account but for some reason you honestly believe we wouldn’t be able to do it in the case of a balanced budget amendment?
    Wow!
    This might actually be the best way to force the President to get approval from congress when he commits our troops to the next idiotic venture.

  • newportres

    Eveything else we do manages to take war ans other states of emergency into account but for some reason you honestly believe we wouldn’t be able to do it in the case of a balanced budget amendment?
    Wow!
    This might actually be the best way to force the President to get approval from congress when he commits our troops to the next idiotic venture.

  • newportres

    Eveything else we do manages to take war ans other states of emergency into account but for some reason you honestly believe we wouldn’t be able to do it in the case of a balanced budget amendment?
    Wow!
    This might actually be the best way to force the President to get approval from congress when he commits our troops to the next idiotic venture.

  • Anonymous

    Spot on larry!!!!

  • Anonymous

    If I remember correctly, S&P had Enron’s debt at AAA before its collapse, the same with all of the banks that essentially failed in 2007-08.  The reason they’re so secretive is that its all basically bologna.

  • Anonymous

    Legally, Obama was to have a budget a year ago, but extended it because of the upcoming election, believing that the liberals would once again be able to push through their agenda.  It is too bad that some R’s showed their wimpy sides once again, and acquiesced to the demands of the D’s.
    Paul Ryan showed intestinal fortitude and skill with his “Cut, cap and balance” plan, but too many of his colleagues are not of the “I have a backbone” mentality.

  • Anonymous

    Politics in a democratic system is based on compromise.  Compromise can tolerate no ideological purists.  When ideological purists prevail you have a disruption of compromise which leads to a failure of the democratic system.

  • Anonymous

    Politics in a democratic system is based on compromise.  Compromise can tolerate no ideological purists.  When ideological purists prevail you have a disruption of compromise which leads to a failure of the democratic system.

  • Anonymous

    No … because there is no one else to vote for. One career polititian or the other? The real test is who is the candidate backed by? That is more telling than who the mouthpiece standing in front of the microphone is.

ADVERTISEMENT | Grow your business

Marketplace Coupons

ADVERTISEMENT | Grow your business