POLL QUESTION

Snowe vows all-out campaign to win re-election

Posted July 24, 2011, at 2:21 p.m.
Last modified July 24, 2011, at 4:51 p.m.
Print this   E-mail this    Facebook this   Tweet this     

Poll Question

Sen. Olympia Snowe, R-Maine, speaks in Portland in May 2010.
AP file photo
Sen. Olympia Snowe, R-Maine, speaks in Portland in May 2010.

AUGUSTA, Maine — Sen. Olympia Snowe has rejected criticism that she is a RINO (Republican in name only) and has vowed to run an all-out campaign to win the GOP nomination and re-election to the U.S. Senate in 2012.

“I don’t take anything for granted, never have and I never will,” she said in an interview. “I am going to campaign hard like I always do and I am already campaigning.”

Snowe said she is tired of those in the right wing of the GOP calling her a RINO. She said her credentials as a fiscal conservative were well established when she served in the House and continued after her first election to the Senate in 1994.

“I didn’t just start supporting the balanced budget amendment,” she said, “I have been a longtime supporter; I was a sponsor when I was in the House of Representatives.”

Snowe said vote after vote in both the House and Senate has proven her fiscal conservatism. She said too often, her willingness to work with Democrats to draft a compromise budget has been distorted as being soft on fiscal issues.

On Friday the Senate, on a party-line vote, blocked consideration of debt reduction legislation that included a balanced budget amendment to the Constitution. She voted to allow the measure to be considered so there could be a vote on the amendment.

“The last time the Senate had this opportunity to debate and vote on a balanced budget amendment was March 4, 1997, when our debt was $5.36 trillion, and the amendment failed by just one vote,” Snowe said. “Since then, our nation’s debt has nearly tripled to $14.3 trillion.”

Snowe is very critical of out-of-state political groups that are seeking to influence her race. She expects they will spend large amounts of money opposing her election as well as supporting her opponents.

“I really don’t think a group based in California or wherever knows Maine and what people here are concerned about,” she said. “They have their own agenda and I don’t think it is what Maine wants.”

Snowe said she has raised over $2 million for her re-election campaign because of the expected spending by out-of-state groups. She said she has also been meeting with small groups of self-described tea party members to discuss her record and her principles.

“Many do not know my history,” she said, “I talk about what I have done and what I am trying to do to address this fiscal crisis we are in. I talk about how I get things done.”

Snowe has two announced primary opponents. Andrew Ian Dodge kicked of his campaign at the Conservative Political Action Conference in Washington, D.C., last February and is one of the leaders of the tea party movement in Maine.

Scott D’Amboise announced last year he was challenging Snowe. He was the GOP nominee in the 2nd Congressional District in 2006 loosing to incumbent Democrat Mike Michaud 179,732 to 75,146 votes.

“Olympia Snowe has never lost an election and I don’t think she will this time,” said Bowdoin College government professor Chris Potholm, a longtime political analyst. He said while any candidate can be defeated by the right opponent, Snowe does not face such an opponent.

“She is a real warrior, she knows how to win and she knows how to run a campaign,” he said. “I have said from day one she will demolish a tea party candidate or anybody else that runs against her.”

Mark Brewer, a political science professor at the University of Maine, said he has been hearing the complaint from some Republicans since he moved to the state that Snowe was not a real Republican. He said that group on the far right has more political muscle in the state this year, particularly in a primary, because of Gov. Paul LePage’s primary win last year.

“They may decide they can’t win a primary, so maybe one of them runs as a third party or an independent in the fall,” he said. “They could take some conservative votes from Snowe and give some hope to the Democrats talking about running.”

Brewer said blunting the strength of the tea party movement in the primary is LePage’s endorsement of Snowe. He said having LePage campaigning for Snowe will be a plus for her.

University of Maine at Farmington political science professor Jim Melcher agrees. He said LePage has a lot of clout with conservatives in the party and his strong support of Snowe will make it difficult for Dodge or D’Amboise get the traction they need.

“You never want to say never in politics,” Melcher said. “But I don’t see how they can have any chance of winning the primary with both in the race. And even if they unite behind a single challenger, it still will be a very difficult race to unseat her.”

All of the professors discount the ability of out-of-state groups to buy the election. They agree Snowe will have the ability to raise the money she needs to get her message to GOP voters and too much spending by outside groups could backfire and help her with voters.

Similar articles:

Marketplace News

Marketplace

Guidelines for posting on bangordailynews.com

The Bangor Daily News encourages comments about stories, but you must follow our terms of service.

In brief:

  1. Keep it civil and stay on topic
  2. No vulgarity, racial slurs, name-calling or personal attacks.
  3. People who harass others or joke about tragedies will be blocked.

The primary rule here is pretty simple: Treat others with the same respect you'd want for yourself. Here are some guidelines (see more):

  • Anonymous

    Great, she has spent us into a 14 trillion dollar debt and she wants more time writing checks our grand kids won’t be able to pay-off! Time for her and the rest of these career spend-a-holics to go to their retirement mansions each one of them has set up and leave fixing this mess to the grown-ups!

  • Anonymous

    Each US Family owes $667,393
    Federal Debt is $119.529 per taxpayer
    each US citizen owes $174,676, all Debt combined

    God bless you all and bless the USA.

    Unfunded Liabilities per citizen is $353,733 per person.

  • Anonymous

    Good luck Olympia. I don’t always agree with you, but respect your hard work, caring and dedication on behalf of Maine citizens.
    I don’t think Olympia has to worry about the out-of-state money either.  And of course, many who are always knocking other states and people moving in from other states, won’t want any out-of-state money attempting to defeat her.
    She won’t be defeated anyway.

  • Anonymous

    Why Run,  haven’t you done enough damage?
    What is it with these egomaniacs?

  • Anonymous

    My vote will be going to the liberal democrat this year.  I’ve had enough of these nasty right-wingers,  we seem to be drowning in them.

  • Anonymous

    My vote will be going to the liberal democrat this year.  I’ve had enough of these nasty right-wingers,  we seem to be drowning in them.

  • Anonymous

    As a Republican, who leans somewhat conservative, my vote is with Snowe.  She will even win in the general election against either Emily Cain or Matthew Dunlap, both who have shown interest in running against her.  And while Emily Cain is running around the state with her Get Real Maine Tour, she needs to get real and realize Maine will not vote for her as their Senator.  Emily needs to go back to Orono and get a real job.

  • Anonymous

    Thank goodness you don’t get to vote in the primary, because that is the only place that Snowe might have a problem (since the dems in this state love Olympia, being the RINO that she is).

  • Anonymous

    I hope that conservative base turns out in the primary and votes her out.  I would actually rather have a democrat take the seat than deal with a RINO.    She is nervous because she know that primary is going to be a problem for her because of her crappy voting record and liberal sucking up.

  • http://pulse.yahoo.com/_FKTKHFPJKGUSNNTTQLMH4O3RQI paul

    it apears the drowning failed as you are still spewing

  • http://pulse.yahoo.com/_FKTKHFPJKGUSNNTTQLMH4O3RQI paul

    it will be interesting for Snowe to defend her entire voting record in the last more recent years.. some of her ” compromising” was very damaging to the conservative vote..I don’ t have a clue how she will be able to justify her votes.. so bring in another conservative .. someone who has a concealed permit and has the guts to make tough decisions when telling the far left to stuff it

  • http://pulse.yahoo.com/_FKTKHFPJKGUSNNTTQLMH4O3RQI paul

    it will be interesting for Snowe to defend her entire voting record in the last more recent years.. some of her ” compromising” was very damaging to the conservative vote..I don’ t have a clue how she will be able to justify her votes.. so bring in another conservative .. someone who has a concealed permit and has the guts to make tough decisions when telling the far left to stuff it

  • Jollyroger

    No big deal!  If you are enrolled in a political party and wish to change to a different party, you must make that change at least fifteen (15) days before the primary or party caucus to be eligible to vote or participate. Once enrolled in a party, you must stay in that party for at least three months.

  • Anonymous

    As a proud conservative I am proud to support Senator Snowe. If the Maine version of Marco Rubio came forward I would consider voting for that alternative in the primary, but I don’t see that candidate. Why hand the Senate seat over to a real, hardcore liberal?

    Jokers like D’Amboise and Andrew Ian Dodge are not serious, viable candidates for a general election and thus should not be considered for primary support…regardless of those times in which Senator Snowe disappointed me.

  • http://www.facebook.com/profile.php?id=100000597019528 David Beaster Jr.

    Hey Olympia!, ..Your horn is showing. According to your voting record, you are….Pro-Abortion, Pro-Gay, and Pro-Environment. I would hate to see how a Democrat votes.

  • Anonymous

    Better yet, she can go home.

  • Anonymous

    Better yet, she can go home.

  • Anonymous

    Better yet, she can go home.

  • Anonymous

    Better yet, she can go home.

  • Anonymous

    Better yet, she can go home.

  • Anonymous

    Fatalistic, aren’t you?  “Rather have a Democrat”?  More like cut off your nose to spite your face.

  • Anonymous

    Too many political “experts” think that knee-jerk ideology is the way to govern, not willingness to compromise and negotiate.  As for out-of-state carpet-bagging money, I hope that it fails.  After all, aren’t true-blue Mainers angry about outsiders meddling in our affairs?

  • Anonymous

    The way the GOP has trended I don’t see how Snowe or Collins either can call themselves a Republican.  But that’s more of a reflection on the extremist elements that have taken over – however briefly – the party.  She will win easily.

  • Anonymous

    The way the GOP has trended I don’t see how Snowe or Collins either can call themselves a Republican.  But that’s more of a reflection on the extremist elements that have taken over – however briefly – the party.  She will win easily.

  • Anonymous

    The way the GOP has trended I don’t see how Snowe or Collins either can call themselves a Republican.  But that’s more of a reflection on the extremist elements that have taken over – however briefly – the party.  She will win easily.

  • Anonymous

    Emily Cain is thinking of running against Snowe?  That’s a laugh, sheesh!  She’s one of the problems with the Democratic party here in Maine.  She’s the party leader but she is too young and too ineffectual for the job.  Wish there was someone stronger to lead the Democrats.

  • Dan Troop

    As bad as I would hate to see the seat go to a Democrat I believe it is time for the people of Maine to bid Snowe a fond farewell. The only way that things are going to change in Washington is to vote out anyone who is up for re-election in 2012. It is time for the people to stand up and send a clear message to every member of Congress to remind them that they serve at the will of the people and not on the checkbook of special interest groups.

  • Dan Troop

    As bad as I would hate to see the seat go to a Democrat I believe it is time for the people of Maine to bid Snowe a fond farewell. The only way that things are going to change in Washington is to vote out anyone who is up for re-election in 2012. It is time for the people to stand up and send a clear message to every member of Congress to remind them that they serve at the will of the people and not on the checkbook of special interest groups.

  • Anonymous

    Ah there is the rub…the two political extremes are BOTH damaging to our country and compromise is the only thing that makes. I find it very interesting that the President has offered to compromise on the debt ceiling but the representative from both parties are unwilling too. Really makes you wonder why?

  • Anonymous

    Ah there is the rub…the two political extremes are BOTH damaging to our country and compromise is the only thing that makes. I find it very interesting that the President has offered to compromise on the debt ceiling but the representative from both parties are unwilling too. Really makes you wonder why?

  • Anonymous

    Ah there is the rub…the two political extremes are BOTH damaging to our country and compromise is the only thing that makes. I find it very interesting that the President has offered to compromise on the debt ceiling but the representative from both parties are unwilling too. Really makes you wonder why?

  • Anonymous

    Ah there is the rub…the two political extremes are BOTH damaging to our country and compromise is the only thing that makes. I find it very interesting that the President has offered to compromise on the debt ceiling but the representative from both parties are unwilling too. Really makes you wonder why?

  • Anonymous

    Snowe said she is tired of those in the right wing of the
    GOP calling her a RINO.

    Then run as a Democrat like the way you ALWAYS vote

    Allowed Obamacare to move to the senate floor

    Voted YES on $192B additional anti-recession stimulus
    spending. (Jul 2009)

    Voted YES on modifying bankruptcy rules to avoid mortgage foreclosures. (May
    2009)

    Voted YES on additional $825 billion for economic recovery package. (Feb
    2009)

    Voted YES on $60B stimulus package for jobs, infrastructure, & energy.
    (Sep 2008)

    Voted NO on paying down federal debt by rating programs’ effectiveness.
    (Mar 2007)

    Voted NO on $40B in reduced federal overall spending. (Dec 2005)

    Voted NO on prioritizing national debt reduction below tax cuts. (Apr 2000)

    Voted YES on 1998 GOP budget. (May 1997)

    Voted YES on Balanced-budget constitutional amendment. (Mar 1997)

    We’ve had enough of SnoweJob.

  • Anonymous

    Snowe said she is tired of those in the right wing of the
    GOP calling her a RINO.

    Then run as a Democrat like the way you ALWAYS vote

    Allowed Obamacare to move to the senate floor

    Voted YES on $192B additional anti-recession stimulus
    spending. (Jul 2009)

    Voted YES on modifying bankruptcy rules to avoid mortgage foreclosures. (May
    2009)

    Voted YES on additional $825 billion for economic recovery package. (Feb
    2009)

    Voted YES on $60B stimulus package for jobs, infrastructure, & energy.
    (Sep 2008)

    Voted NO on paying down federal debt by rating programs’ effectiveness.
    (Mar 2007)

    Voted NO on $40B in reduced federal overall spending. (Dec 2005)

    Voted NO on prioritizing national debt reduction below tax cuts. (Apr 2000)

    Voted YES on 1998 GOP budget. (May 1997)

    Voted YES on Balanced-budget constitutional amendment. (Mar 1997)

    We’ve had enough of SnoweJob.

  • Anonymous

    Snowe said she is tired of those in the right wing of the
    GOP calling her a RINO.

    Then run as a Democrat like the way you ALWAYS vote

    Allowed Obamacare to move to the senate floor

    Voted YES on $192B additional anti-recession stimulus
    spending. (Jul 2009)

    Voted YES on modifying bankruptcy rules to avoid mortgage foreclosures. (May
    2009)

    Voted YES on additional $825 billion for economic recovery package. (Feb
    2009)

    Voted YES on $60B stimulus package for jobs, infrastructure, & energy.
    (Sep 2008)

    Voted NO on paying down federal debt by rating programs’ effectiveness.
    (Mar 2007)

    Voted NO on $40B in reduced federal overall spending. (Dec 2005)

    Voted NO on prioritizing national debt reduction below tax cuts. (Apr 2000)

    Voted YES on 1998 GOP budget. (May 1997)

    Voted YES on Balanced-budget constitutional amendment. (Mar 1997)

    We’ve had enough of SnoweJob.

  • Anonymous

    Snowe said she is tired of those in the right wing of the
    GOP calling her a RINO.

    Then run as a Democrat like the way you ALWAYS vote

    Allowed Obamacare to move to the senate floor

    Voted YES on $192B additional anti-recession stimulus
    spending. (Jul 2009)

    Voted YES on modifying bankruptcy rules to avoid mortgage foreclosures. (May
    2009)

    Voted YES on additional $825 billion for economic recovery package. (Feb
    2009)

    Voted YES on $60B stimulus package for jobs, infrastructure, & energy.
    (Sep 2008)

    Voted NO on paying down federal debt by rating programs’ effectiveness.
    (Mar 2007)

    Voted NO on $40B in reduced federal overall spending. (Dec 2005)

    Voted NO on prioritizing national debt reduction below tax cuts. (Apr 2000)

    Voted YES on 1998 GOP budget. (May 1997)

    Voted YES on Balanced-budget constitutional amendment. (Mar 1997)

    We’ve had enough of SnoweJob.

  • StillRelaxin

    This may be the only time I will wish the Tea Party good luck.  If the oddly far far right gang can knock her off her perch in the primary election the democrats may have a real chance at taking what would otherwise be a lock solid senate seat.  Go Tea Party!  Keep crippling the GOP!

  • StillRelaxin

    This may be the only time I will wish the Tea Party good luck.  If the oddly far far right gang can knock her off her perch in the primary election the democrats may have a real chance at taking what would otherwise be a lock solid senate seat.  Go Tea Party!  Keep crippling the GOP!

  • http://pulse.yahoo.com/_KJEUWEYRHIPWV3PTTWWNUZ2CTQ mcmaineacjam

    The reason Senator Snowe has been sucessful in being elected is that whe is more moderate. If she bends too much to these extreme right wingers, she will lose votes. I know I vote for people, not parties, and I will not vote for anyone that caters to the Tea Party vocal minority. Remember Olympia, most Mainers talk with their vote, and are not into mud slinging and name calling.

  • http://pulse.yahoo.com/_KJEUWEYRHIPWV3PTTWWNUZ2CTQ mcmaineacjam

    The reason Senator Snowe has been sucessful in being elected is that whe is more moderate. If she bends too much to these extreme right wingers, she will lose votes. I know I vote for people, not parties, and I will not vote for anyone that caters to the Tea Party vocal minority. Remember Olympia, most Mainers talk with their vote, and are not into mud slinging and name calling.

  • Anonymous

    A RINO she is, along with her counterpart Susan Collins!
    Olympia is a lady and always has been, but her pro-abortion stand is adamantly strong(where did her $2 million come from), and she is for the alternative family concept, so she will not get my vote.

  • Anonymous

    I think we are seeing, more and more with recent events,etc. , how destructive extreme ideology can be.

  • Anonymous

    My chief concern is her ability to separate her financial self-interest from the good of the country.  During the last several years her reported wealth has gone from six figures to multimillionaire levels.  How did this happen?  No one has ever asked her. 
     
    But records show that after she was appointed to the deficit-building senate finance committee her husband’s business took off.  How and why did this happen? 
     
    Here’s a clue; his partner (40% owner of his company) is Goldman Sachs, the biggest of the too big to fail Wall Street Banks, the biggest beneficiary of the Wall Street Bail-Out.  Senator Snowe voted for the bailout and billions of dollars to her partner Goldman Sachs as a member of the finance committee and the US Senate.

  • Anonymous

    My chief concern is her ability to separate her financial self-interest from the good of the country.  During the last several years her reported wealth has gone from six figures to multimillionaire levels.  How did this happen?  No one has ever asked her. 
     
    But records show that after she was appointed to the deficit-building senate finance committee her husband’s business took off.  How and why did this happen? 
     
    Here’s a clue; his partner (40% owner of his company) is Goldman Sachs, the biggest of the too big to fail Wall Street Banks, the biggest beneficiary of the Wall Street Bail-Out.  Senator Snowe voted for the bailout and billions of dollars to her partner Goldman Sachs as a member of the finance committee and the US Senate.

  • Anonymous

    Oh , yeah a “concealed permit” is the answer to everything!  Oh my gosh.

    You can’t make this stuff up!

  • Anonymous

    Oh , yeah a “concealed permit” is the answer to everything!  Oh my gosh.

    You can’t make this stuff up!

  • ChuckGG

    I agree.   As a “real” Republican, I am hoping our party gets back to the pragmatic fiscal world and drops these social conservatives that are just, well, nuts, for lack of a better word.  The term RINO is insulting.  If the Tea Party Express wants a different party then they should start their own, rather than hijack us, and leave the real Republicans where we ought to be – moderate, fiscally conservative but pragmatic, intellectual rather than ignorant, and willing to work toward long-term solutions rather than jump to the Draconian dogma they have put forth.  We in Maine have a long history of intelligent, aware, capable Republicans and Democrats.  The new crowd sworn into office in 2010 is embarrassingly unaware of how the real world works.

  • Anonymous

    That’s okay, she will still have plenty of support.

  • Anonymous

    That’s okay, she will still have plenty of support.

  • Anonymous

    That’s okay, she will still have plenty of support.

  • http://www.facebook.com/people/Gerry-Keavany/100001052295711 Gerry Keavany

    Voted YES on $192B additional anti-recession stimulus spending. (Jul 2009)Voted YES on modifying bankruptcy rules to avoid mortgage foreclosures. (May 2009)
    Voted YES on additional $825 billion for economic recovery package. (Feb 2009)
    Voted YES on $60B stimulus package for jobs, infrastructure, & energy. (Sep 2008)
    Voted NO on paying down federal debt by rating programs’ effectiveness. (Mar 2007)
    Voted NO on $40B in reduced federal overall spending. (Dec 2005)
    Voted NO on prioritizing national debt reduction below tax cuts. (Apr 2000)

    That’s conservative?

  • http://www.facebook.com/people/Gerry-Keavany/100001052295711 Gerry Keavany

    Voted YES on $192B additional anti-recession stimulus spending. (Jul 2009)Voted YES on modifying bankruptcy rules to avoid mortgage foreclosures. (May 2009)
    Voted YES on additional $825 billion for economic recovery package. (Feb 2009)
    Voted YES on $60B stimulus package for jobs, infrastructure, & energy. (Sep 2008)
    Voted NO on paying down federal debt by rating programs’ effectiveness. (Mar 2007)
    Voted NO on $40B in reduced federal overall spending. (Dec 2005)
    Voted NO on prioritizing national debt reduction below tax cuts. (Apr 2000)

    That’s conservative?

  • ChuckGG

    Well, of course, any normal Republican of the past – Eisenhower, Nixon, Ford, Bush-41, Rockefeller, Reagan, and even Barry Goldwater, today would be considered radical left-wing, socialistic, RINOs if we listened to the Tea Party Express standard.

    Never in my 56 years have I seen a nuttier Congress in DC than I have in the Tea Party Express crowd.  Normally, the nutbars are eliminated long before even the primaries start and never are they elected.  In 2010, I was dumbfound how far some of the people managed to go.  Fortunately, the Nazi reenactor, the crazy guy from Alaska, the Nevada nutcase, and the clueless one, O’Donnell, from Delaware were weeded out.

    My suggestion is to turn off FOX News, pick up and read several real newspapers, listen to some normal political dialog, and discover how the real world works.  With any luck the Tea Party Express will fade away much like the John Birch Society and the KKK – still there, but impotent.

    Snowe has seniority and is one of the few Republican moderates remaining in the Senate.  It would be foolish to not re-elect her.

  • Anonymous

    Every one of the Washington bubble  people in both houses who have been there for more then 6 years is the ones that has caused the present problems.  What do they think we are so stupid and think this Debt emergency just happened… Everyone kisses Bama Mamas A$$ and gives him more money to toss away….Dont think he has ever held a real job, and the on the job training as President sure isent working out to well…This Nov its time to get the Dems out of office, and someone with some common sence in the WH… Why raise the debt limit and give these clowns more money to pi$$ away!!!!!  Then next year more & more, they are like PIGs…..never get enought….”dont want to hear it”

  • Anonymous

    “What do they think we are so stupid and think this Debt emergency just happened”

    No, we are just stupid to re-elect the ones that do nothing to solve the mess.

    “This Nov its time to get the Dems out of office, and someone with some common sence in the WH”

    I think you are off by about a year and 4 months.

  • Anonymous

    Did you vote for her in the past? And, if you didn’t who did you vote for?

  • ChuckGG

    Or, we could retain Snowe (she’d be tough to beat, anyway) and have her as one of the few sane, moderate voices remaining on the GOP side.   She has seniority, is very intelligent, an eloquent speaker, a friend of LePage (which may moderate some of his unusual views),  and probably could bring more to Maine than a freshman Democrat senator, and certainly more than another of the Tea Party Express case that is clueless to the real world.

  • Anonymous

    Born a republican, raised a republican, supported republicans. Never again. I am done. I have never seen so much greed and corruption in my life as within the party. Bye Bye. They are no longer supporting whats best for the USA. Its all about greed above all else.

  • Anonymous

    And just who are the grown-ups?

  • ChuckGG

    If you have ever heard Olympia speak on the Senate floor, you quickly realize how aware and intelligent she is.  I am reminded of another powerful Maine senator, Margaret Chase Smith.  I doubt anyone in the Tea Party Express, given their extremely limited understanding of history and the real world, would even recognize her name.

    Why on earth would we give up a senior Senator with her level of seniority, experience, and connections, for either a freshman Democrat or yet another unaware Tea Party disciple, especially in these challenging times?

  • Anonymous

    I think we all should register as republicans and elect Andrew Ian Dodge in the primary. 

  • Anonymous

    I remember 25 years ago the liberal /progressives had a campaign “Snowe Removal in Progress”, well they haven’t made much progress removing her. And my friends in the Tea Party won’t either.  I don’t always agree with her, but in Maine she’s the best the Republicans will get.  And no liberal/progressive Democrat will ever get it.

  • Anonymous

    If she doesn’t win her nomination, the seat will go to a Democrat. Notice the numbers by which Pingree and Michaud were swept back to Washington?

  • Anonymous

    Lol.  I will take that under consideration. Lol.

  • Anonymous

    Nice spin, but it’s not pro-abortion. She is pro-choice. Notice how she isn’t pressuring women to abort their pregnancies? 

    And what alternative family concept are you talking about?

  • Anonymous

    Now that’s the way to choose a candidate. He/she who shows up with the biggest gun wins. Anyone know where I can pick up a used, but in good shape M1-A1 Abrams tank?

  • Anonymous

    There are so very  many errors in your grammar and spelling.
    There are so very many errors in your thinking.

  • Anonymous

    Where are you guys getting this talking points? A few of you are copy/pasting the same things.

  • Anonymous

    Where are you guys getting this talking points? A few of you are copy/pasting the same things.

  • Anonymous

    Unreal.
    I’d be really laughing except it is so “sad.”

    As I said…..you can’t make this stuff up.

  • Anonymous

    Good point, but that poster sounds extremely conservative (from her comments) so pro-choice is something she would not accept nor understand, based on her comments from the past.  (You know, when the mother’s life is at stake, as one example.)  It has got to be black or white….don’t you know!

  • Anonymous

    Good point, but that poster sounds extremely conservative (from her comments) so pro-choice is something she would not accept nor understand, based on her comments from the past.  (You know, when the mother’s life is at stake, as one example.)  It has got to be black or white….don’t you know!

  • Anonymous

    Good point, but that poster sounds extremely conservative (from her comments) so pro-choice is something she would not accept nor understand, based on her comments from the past.  (You know, when the mother’s life is at stake, as one example.)  It has got to be black or white….don’t you know!

  • Anonymous

    Mr. Bush and company got us in the mess we’re in today. let’s not forget she was part of the ( and company).  What we dont have it anyone with her credentials or clout. Unfortunatly we really dont have a good pool to pick from. Actualy except for a few instances like Longley have we ever?

  • Anonymous

    Sen. Snowe should just switch over to the democrats. She is one all but in name.

  • Anonymous

    “My suggestion is to turn off FOX News, pick up and read several real
    newspapers, listen to some normal political dialog, and discover how the
    real world works. ”

    My suggestion is to turn off CNN, read the Internet where the question “Source?” disembowels the MSMs’ sycophantic regurgitation of Democratic talking points and discover a world without unicorns and rainbows.

  • Anonymous

    I will vote for anyone BUT her. Even a liberal leftist demoncrat. She needs to go and so does Collins.

  • Anonymous

    OK I will answer your question. Why hand the seat over to a real hardcore liberal? Why not, we already have one sitting in it. She voted for Obamacare. In fact, if it WASNT for her and her alone, Obamacare wouldnt be law right now. We need anyone but her in that seat.

  • Anonymous

    OK I will answer your question. Why hand the seat over to a real hardcore liberal? Why not, we already have one sitting in it. She voted for Obamacare. In fact, if it WASNT for her and her alone, Obamacare wouldnt be law right now. We need anyone but her in that seat.

  • Anonymous

    OK I will answer your question. Why hand the seat over to a real hardcore liberal? Why not, we already have one sitting in it. She voted for Obamacare. In fact, if it WASNT for her and her alone, Obamacare wouldnt be law right now. We need anyone but her in that seat.

  • Anonymous

    OK I will answer your question. Why hand the seat over to a real hardcore liberal? Why not, we already have one sitting in it. She voted for Obamacare. In fact, if it WASNT for her and her alone, Obamacare wouldnt be law right now. We need anyone but her in that seat.

  • Anonymous

    OK I will answer your question. Why hand the seat over to a real hardcore liberal? Why not, we already have one sitting in it. She voted for Obamacare. In fact, if it WASNT for her and her alone, Obamacare wouldnt be law right now. We need anyone but her in that seat.

  • Anonymous

    OK I will answer your question. Why hand the seat over to a real hardcore liberal? Why not, we already have one sitting in it. She voted for Obamacare. In fact, if it WASNT for her and her alone, Obamacare wouldnt be law right now. We need anyone but her in that seat.

  • Anonymous

    Liberal Democrat = Snowe!

    She is not a conservative!

  • Anonymous

    She is not a hardcore liberal. She did not vote for Obamacare either. She voted to let the bill out of committee and to the floor. On the floor vote she voted against Obamacare along with every Republican in the House and Senate.

    Olympia is a reliable vote about 85% of the time. That is better than nothing and is the best you will get out of any politician capable of winning a statewide election in Maine.

  • Anonymous

    Which party spent $787 billion on shovel-ready jobs that became an Obama joke?
    Which party couldnt pass a budget for 2 years even with control of both houses and the WH?
    Which party STILL hasnt put forth ANY plan on the debt ceiling?
    Which party is talking class warfare about corporate jet tax breaks when they themselves gave those corporate jet tax breaks just 2 years ago?
    Which party had a leader refer to Obama as not having a “negro dialect”?
    Which party bailed out GM and then tried to claim we taxpayer were “paid back in full” and then we find out we took a  $1.6 billon LOSS in the deal?
    Which party let guns be sold illegally in 4 border states, stopped the ATF from tracking the guns into Mexico, and then tried to use the illegal gun sales as motive to restrict the 2nd amendment rights of American citizens?

    Thats right pal. All the Demoncrat party. You want to talk corruption? The demoncrats have corruption down to a science. If you are so concerned with corruption, the DNC  should be the first place you look.

  • Anonymous

    Had she not allowed Obamacare to move forward, it wouldnt be law. Which part of what I said do you not get?

  • Anonymous

    Since 1994, good bye, I graduated high school in 1991, you’ve been there too long.

  • Anonymous

    Pro-life or Pro-death. Lets stop calling killing a human life a “choice”

  • Anonymous

    Maine rivals California and New York for the  most pathetic senators.

  • Anonymous

    Snowe was the deciding vote to allow ObamaCare out of committee.  With it free to roam to a vote and customized to transfer $550,000,000,000 from senior’s Medicare to be used for whateverpurpose under ObamaCare. Without her fatal vote, ObamaCare would not exist. Some would say this is a bad thing.. but that’s a minority opinion. In 2014, seniors will begin to understand the real consequences when they find out their healthcare has been cannibalized. Watch out for the black tipped tailed and ears above the grass as the cats prowl seeking out the weak who are not able to keep up with the herd. In 2012, vote like your life depended on it.. because it probably does.

  • http://pulse.yahoo.com/_OA4CY7VEIB2S453LCNHIVU5DMQ Joe Johnson

    If snowe was a democrat wouldn’t she have voted to give sick people health insurance. All the republicans voted against heath care reform and didn’t offer a real plan. What kind of “family values” are those to vote for corporate profits over sick people. of course they said it cost to much you know the same people who want endless war in iraq think healthcare is to expensive.

  • Anonymous

    I don’t disagree with your sentiment, but almost half of all congressmembers are millionaires (just 1% for all of Americans). 

  • Anonymous

    SNOWE MUST GO.
    How about a compassionate conservative like me. Do I have your support?

  • Anonymous

    SNOWE MUST GO.
    How about a compassionate conservative like me. Do I have your support?

  • Anonymous

    SNOWE MUST GO.
    How about a compassionate conservative like me. Do I have your support?

  • Anonymous

    You could always vote for Sen. Snowe. She is about as far left as one can get without turning into a donkey. Anybody else notice she looks an awful lot like Ralph Nader in appearance. If he put on a wig or she got a hair cut they would be twins.

  • Anonymous

    You could always vote for Sen. Snowe. She is about as far left as one can get without turning into a donkey. Anybody else notice she looks an awful lot like Ralph Nader in appearance. If he put on a wig or she got a hair cut they would be twins.

  • Anonymous

    You could always vote for Sen. Snowe. She is about as far left as one can get without turning into a donkey. Anybody else notice she looks an awful lot like Ralph Nader in appearance. If he put on a wig or she got a hair cut they would be twins.

  • Anonymous

    Yes, you do sound like a LePage man.
    He is insulting as well.

  • Anonymous

    Yes, you do sound like a LePage man.
    He is insulting as well.

  • Anonymous

    Bingo!

    Which is why you see so little real governing and compromise going on. Too many leaders beholden to the fat cats.

  • Anonymous

    Bingo!

    Which is why you see so little real governing and compromise going on. Too many leaders beholden to the fat cats.

  • ChuckGG

    Sadly true.  It is a far cry from the Republican party I signed on for.  We used to have skilled debaters and intelligent, erudite,  polished statesmen, diplomats and politicians.  We never heard about all this religious claptrap we now hear from the Tea Party Express.  Religion was for churches and had nothing to do with our secular society.  Decisions were based upon facts and not divine intervention.

    Today, I would not rate the politicians I hear, especially those from my Republican party, as any better than fourth-place contestants from a hog-calling derby.  I am stunned the Senate and House have sunk to this level.  The United States Senate once was called “the greatest deliberative body in the world.”  It seems the intelligentsia of the USA has opted-out of the circus that now is Congress.  I hardly can blame them but it is our loss.   Today, we need intelligent, pragmatic leaders and not a bunch of buffoons praying for solutions that will not come and who coddle the masses to placate their fears and garner their votes.

  • ChuckGG

    Sadly true.  It is a far cry from the Republican party I signed on for.  We used to have skilled debaters and intelligent, erudite,  polished statesmen, diplomats and politicians.  We never heard about all this religious claptrap we now hear from the Tea Party Express.  Religion was for churches and had nothing to do with our secular society.  Decisions were based upon facts and not divine intervention.

    Today, I would not rate the politicians I hear, especially those from my Republican party, as any better than fourth-place contestants from a hog-calling derby.  I am stunned the Senate and House have sunk to this level.  The United States Senate once was called “the greatest deliberative body in the world.”  It seems the intelligentsia of the USA has opted-out of the circus that now is Congress.  I hardly can blame them but it is our loss.   Today, we need intelligent, pragmatic leaders and not a bunch of buffoons praying for solutions that will not come and who coddle the masses to placate their fears and garner their votes.

  • ChuckGG

    Sadly true.  It is a far cry from the Republican party I signed on for.  We used to have skilled debaters and intelligent, erudite,  polished statesmen, diplomats and politicians.  We never heard about all this religious claptrap we now hear from the Tea Party Express.  Religion was for churches and had nothing to do with our secular society.  Decisions were based upon facts and not divine intervention.

    Today, I would not rate the politicians I hear, especially those from my Republican party, as any better than fourth-place contestants from a hog-calling derby.  I am stunned the Senate and House have sunk to this level.  The United States Senate once was called “the greatest deliberative body in the world.”  It seems the intelligentsia of the USA has opted-out of the circus that now is Congress.  I hardly can blame them but it is our loss.   Today, we need intelligent, pragmatic leaders and not a bunch of buffoons praying for solutions that will not come and who coddle the masses to placate their fears and garner their votes.

  • ChuckGG

    Sadly true.  It is a far cry from the Republican party I signed on for.  We used to have skilled debaters and intelligent, erudite,  polished statesmen, diplomats and politicians.  We never heard about all this religious claptrap we now hear from the Tea Party Express.  Religion was for churches and had nothing to do with our secular society.  Decisions were based upon facts and not divine intervention.

    Today, I would not rate the politicians I hear, especially those from my Republican party, as any better than fourth-place contestants from a hog-calling derby.  I am stunned the Senate and House have sunk to this level.  The United States Senate once was called “the greatest deliberative body in the world.”  It seems the intelligentsia of the USA has opted-out of the circus that now is Congress.  I hardly can blame them but it is our loss.   Today, we need intelligent, pragmatic leaders and not a bunch of buffoons praying for solutions that will not come and who coddle the masses to placate their fears and garner their votes.

  • Anonymous

    I hope that people have learned their lesson about voting for Tea Party nuts with their mission to destroy the middleclass.

  • Anonymous

    I hope that people have learned their lesson about voting for Tea Party nuts with their mission to destroy the middleclass.

  • Anonymous

    I hope that people have learned their lesson about voting for Tea Party nuts with their mission to destroy the middleclass.

  • Anonymous

    A real insurance plan is affordable, not because the government mandates that you need to purchase it.  Affordable health insurance is created by the healthcare system and reducing all of it’s wasteful spending, just like taxes are reduced by the governments wasteful spending.  Look at the spending and reduce the waste and most everything becomes affordable.

  • Anonymous

    A real insurance plan is affordable, not because the government mandates that you need to purchase it.  Affordable health insurance is created by the healthcare system and reducing all of it’s wasteful spending, just like taxes are reduced by the governments wasteful spending.  Look at the spending and reduce the waste and most everything becomes affordable.

  • Anonymous

    A real insurance plan is affordable, not because the government mandates that you need to purchase it.  Affordable health insurance is created by the healthcare system and reducing all of it’s wasteful spending, just like taxes are reduced by the governments wasteful spending.  Look at the spending and reduce the waste and most everything becomes affordable.

  • Anonymous

    A real insurance plan is affordable, not because the government mandates that you need to purchase it.  Affordable health insurance is created by the healthcare system and reducing all of it’s wasteful spending, just like taxes are reduced by the governments wasteful spending.  Look at the spending and reduce the waste and most everything becomes affordable.

  • Anonymous

    A real insurance plan is affordable, not because the government mandates that you need to purchase it.  Affordable health insurance is created by the healthcare system and reducing all of it’s wasteful spending, just like taxes are reduced by the governments wasteful spending.  Look at the spending and reduce the waste and most everything becomes affordable.

  • Anonymous

    A real insurance plan is affordable, not because the government mandates that you need to purchase it.  Affordable health insurance is created by the healthcare system and reducing all of it’s wasteful spending, just like taxes are reduced by the governments wasteful spending.  Look at the spending and reduce the waste and most everything becomes affordable.

  • Anonymous

    A real insurance plan is affordable, not because the government mandates that you need to purchase it.  Affordable health insurance is created by the healthcare system and reducing all of it’s wasteful spending, just like taxes are reduced by the governments wasteful spending.  Look at the spending and reduce the waste and most everything becomes affordable.

  • Anonymous

    A real insurance plan is affordable, not because the government mandates that you need to purchase it.  Affordable health insurance is created by the healthcare system and reducing all of it’s wasteful spending, just like taxes are reduced by the governments wasteful spending.  Look at the spending and reduce the waste and most everything becomes affordable.

  • Anonymous

    A real insurance plan is affordable, not because the government mandates that you need to purchase it.  Affordable health insurance is created by the healthcare system and reducing all of it’s wasteful spending, just like taxes are reduced by the governments wasteful spending.  Look at the spending and reduce the waste and most everything becomes affordable.

  • Anonymous

    You need to educate yourself on the issues before commenting on this site. Olympia did not have the sole power to prevent it from leaving committee. You said she voted for Obamacare…it is readily apparent you are not aware of whats happening.

  • Anonymous

    You need to educate yourself on the issues before commenting on this site. Olympia did not have the sole power to prevent it from leaving committee. You said she voted for Obamacare…it is readily apparent you are not aware of whats happening.

  • Anonymous

    Let me touch upon that subject a bit more. An abortion is the destruction of a human life. I dont like euphemisms, so lets just call it what it is. Having said that, I dont support making abortion illegal. The reason is simple. Just like the prohibition on alcohol, the war on drugs and so forth…it wont work. And making it illegal will just make the situation worse. I do believe that abortions should be limited and not used as birth control, but just because I dont like something doesnt make it illegal.

  • Anonymous

    compassionate conservative?  that’s a contradiction in terms….

  • Anonymous

    Obama tells us we have to ‘eat our peas”.. My response is stop peaing down my back and tell me it’s raining. Obama says he can’t guarantee that soc sec checks will be mailed in August. I say I can’t guarantee that my quarterly tax return will be mailed in September.

  • http://pulse.yahoo.com/_QCC3ABRLTIU3EFA26HUIDQZTSM Chris

    I hope the tea baggers spend a lot of their out of state cash to unseat one of their own party.  The last laugh will be on them when Olympia pulls a Joe L. and runs as an independent and kicks their butts in the general election.

  • Anonymous

    Not accurate and not relevant. 

  • Anonymous

    More Obama Maoist propaganda. Next you’ll tell us how taxing the millionaires and billionaires who only make $250k a year is going to save us. No need to cut spending right? Maybe you can explain how the Tea Party has managed to stop the demoncrats from passing a budget for almost 3 years while the demoncrats held a filibuster-proof majority? The Tea Party must be friggin MAGIC to do that. Then tell us how the Tea Party forced the 3/4 of a Trillion-dollar stimulus bill that became a punchline for a failed Obama joke down our throats?? How did the Tea Party spend $4 trillion dollars in less than 3 years?? Oh right…Obama again. I think you just like to toss names around John. But if youre still voting Demoncrat after all this, YOU are the nut.

  • Anonymous

    Yes, similar to “intelligent liberal”

  • Anonymous

    How about you KMA. Snowe vote to allow Obamacare to move out of committee was the deciding vote. Without it, no Obamacare. Can you get that now or do I need to write it in crayon?

  • Anonymous

    How about you KMA. Snowe vote to allow Obamacare to move out of committee was the deciding vote. Without it, no Obamacare. Can you get that now or do I need to write it in crayon?

  • Anonymous

    Snowe and Collins voted with bush to bankrupt the country and start two illegal wars…gut the constitution . For some reason that is ok with the conservatives if there is a republican doing it. Obama and his crowd are doing the same thing.

  • Anonymous

    Snowe and Collins voted with bush to bankrupt the country and start two illegal wars…gut the constitution . For some reason that is ok with the conservatives if there is a republican doing it. Obama and his crowd are doing the same thing.

  • Anonymous

    Snowe and Collins voted with bush to bankrupt the country and start two illegal wars…gut the constitution . For some reason that is ok with the conservatives if there is a republican doing it. Obama and his crowd are doing the same thing.

  • Anonymous

    Snowe and Collins voted with bush to bankrupt the country and start two illegal wars…gut the constitution . For some reason that is ok with the conservatives if there is a republican doing it. Obama and his crowd are doing the same thing.

  • Anonymous

    Snowe and Collins voted with bush to bankrupt the country and start two illegal wars…gut the constitution . For some reason that is ok with the conservatives if there is a republican doing it. Obama and his crowd are doing the same thing.

  • Anonymous

    Snowe and Collins voted with bush to bankrupt the country and start two illegal wars…gut the constitution . For some reason that is ok with the conservatives if there is a republican doing it. Obama and his crowd are doing the same thing.

  • Anonymous

    Snowe and Collins voted with bush to bankrupt the country and start two illegal wars…gut the constitution . For some reason that is ok with the conservatives if there is a republican doing it. Obama and his crowd are doing the same thing.

  • Anonymous

    I am ultra -conservative, and the only way a candidate gets my vote is if he/she passes the pro-life question.  if not pro-life,  then my name is written in–simple as that.

  • Anonymous

    I am ultra -conservative, and the only way a candidate gets my vote is if he/she passes the pro-life question.  if not pro-life,  then my name is written in–simple as that.

  • Anonymous

    I am ultra -conservative, and the only way a candidate gets my vote is if he/she passes the pro-life question.  if not pro-life,  then my name is written in–simple as that.

  • Anonymous

    I am ultra -conservative, and the only way a candidate gets my vote is if he/she passes the pro-life question.  if not pro-life,  then my name is written in–simple as that.

  • Anonymous

    I am ultra -conservative, and the only way a candidate gets my vote is if he/she passes the pro-life question.  if not pro-life,  then my name is written in–simple as that.

  • Anonymous

    I am ultra -conservative, and the only way a candidate gets my vote is if he/she passes the pro-life question.  if not pro-life,  then my name is written in–simple as that.

  • Anonymous

    I am ultra -conservative, and the only way a candidate gets my vote is if he/she passes the pro-life question.  if not pro-life,  then my name is written in–simple as that.

  • Anonymous

    I am ultra -conservative, and the only way a candidate gets my vote is if he/she passes the pro-life question.  if not pro-life,  then my name is written in–simple as that.

  • Anonymous

    She votes republican. May not be good enough for tea partiers. Maybe it is time to start a more conservative party than the current republicans. Call it fascist and be done with it.

  • Anonymous

    She votes republican. May not be good enough for tea partiers. Maybe it is time to start a more conservative party than the current republicans. Call it fascist and be done with it.

  • Anonymous

    She votes republican. May not be good enough for tea partiers. Maybe it is time to start a more conservative party than the current republicans. Call it fascist and be done with it.

  • Anonymous

    She votes republican. May not be good enough for tea partiers. Maybe it is time to start a more conservative party than the current republicans. Call it fascist and be done with it.

  • Anonymous

    She votes republican. May not be good enough for tea partiers. Maybe it is time to start a more conservative party than the current republicans. Call it fascist and be done with it.

  • Anonymous

    She votes republican. May not be good enough for tea partiers. Maybe it is time to start a more conservative party than the current republicans. Call it fascist and be done with it.

  • Anonymous

    She votes republican. May not be good enough for tea partiers. Maybe it is time to start a more conservative party than the current republicans. Call it fascist and be done with it.

  • Anonymous

    She votes republican. May not be good enough for tea partiers. Maybe it is time to start a more conservative party than the current republicans. Call it fascist and be done with it.

  • Anonymous

    She votes republican. May not be good enough for tea partiers. Maybe it is time to start a more conservative party than the current republicans. Call it fascist and be done with it.

  • Anonymous

    She votes republican. May not be good enough for tea partiers. Maybe it is time to start a more conservative party than the current republicans. Call it fascist and be done with it.

  • Anonymous

    Like you’ve ever voted conservative in your life Bangorian?  c’mon try to sell us another one.

  • Anonymous

    Like you’ve ever voted conservative in your life Bangorian?  c’mon try to sell us another one.

  • Anonymous

    Like you’ve ever voted conservative in your life Bangorian?  c’mon try to sell us another one.

  • Anonymous

    Like you’ve ever voted conservative in your life Bangorian?  c’mon try to sell us another one.

  • Anonymous

    Like you’ve ever voted conservative in your life Bangorian?  c’mon try to sell us another one.

  • Anonymous

    Like you’ve ever voted conservative in your life Bangorian?  c’mon try to sell us another one.

  • Anonymous

    Like you’ve ever voted conservative in your life Bangorian?  c’mon try to sell us another one.

  • Anonymous

    Like you’ve ever voted conservative in your life Bangorian?  c’mon try to sell us another one.

  • Anonymous

    All of those millionaires (if your figures are accurate)  in congress are not on committees that vote billions of dollars to their business partners, are they?

    Besides, aren’t elections about deciding who will represent us in congress?  We’re not talking about everyone elses members of congress; We’re talking about who should be ours.

  • Anonymous

    Thoughtful democrats do not want another Obama term. Talking of running a candidate against him in the primaries.

    Meanwhile, back at the ranch, the Office of Management and Budget is saying the US has the 2nd lowest tax rate on corporations, second only to Iceland. 

    Rep. Defazio on the floor of the House stated that the Pentagon has spent more than 10 trillion since 1990, and will spend 4 trillion over the next four years without ever being audited. 

    Support the troops covers a multitude of sins.

  • Anonymous

    Thoughtful democrats do not want another Obama term. Talking of running a candidate against him in the primaries.

    Meanwhile, back at the ranch, the Office of Management and Budget is saying the US has the 2nd lowest tax rate on corporations, second only to Iceland. 

    Rep. Defazio on the floor of the House stated that the Pentagon has spent more than 10 trillion since 1990, and will spend 4 trillion over the next four years without ever being audited. 

    Support the troops covers a multitude of sins.

  • Anonymous

    Thoughtful democrats do not want another Obama term. Talking of running a candidate against him in the primaries.

    Meanwhile, back at the ranch, the Office of Management and Budget is saying the US has the 2nd lowest tax rate on corporations, second only to Iceland. 

    Rep. Defazio on the floor of the House stated that the Pentagon has spent more than 10 trillion since 1990, and will spend 4 trillion over the next four years without ever being audited. 

    Support the troops covers a multitude of sins.

  • Anonymous

    Thoughtful democrats do not want another Obama term. Talking of running a candidate against him in the primaries.

    Meanwhile, back at the ranch, the Office of Management and Budget is saying the US has the 2nd lowest tax rate on corporations, second only to Iceland. 

    Rep. Defazio on the floor of the House stated that the Pentagon has spent more than 10 trillion since 1990, and will spend 4 trillion over the next four years without ever being audited. 

    Support the troops covers a multitude of sins.

  • Anonymous

    Thoughtful democrats do not want another Obama term. Talking of running a candidate against him in the primaries.

    Meanwhile, back at the ranch, the Office of Management and Budget is saying the US has the 2nd lowest tax rate on corporations, second only to Iceland. 

    Rep. Defazio on the floor of the House stated that the Pentagon has spent more than 10 trillion since 1990, and will spend 4 trillion over the next four years without ever being audited. 

    Support the troops covers a multitude of sins.

  • Anonymous

    You evidently do not follow politics to think that Sen. Snowe is a lefty. She voted for the Patriot Act. Google it and see where the constitution is no longer used by our govt. as a guideline for it’s actions.

  • Anonymous

    You evidently do not follow politics to think that Sen. Snowe is a lefty. She voted for the Patriot Act. Google it and see where the constitution is no longer used by our govt. as a guideline for it’s actions.

  • Anonymous

    You evidently do not follow politics to think that Sen. Snowe is a lefty. She voted for the Patriot Act. Google it and see where the constitution is no longer used by our govt. as a guideline for it’s actions.

  • Anonymous

    You evidently do not follow politics to think that Sen. Snowe is a lefty. She voted for the Patriot Act. Google it and see where the constitution is no longer used by our govt. as a guideline for it’s actions.

  • Anonymous

    You evidently do not follow politics to think that Sen. Snowe is a lefty. She voted for the Patriot Act. Google it and see where the constitution is no longer used by our govt. as a guideline for it’s actions.

  • Anonymous

    You evidently do not follow politics to think that Sen. Snowe is a lefty. She voted for the Patriot Act. Google it and see where the constitution is no longer used by our govt. as a guideline for it’s actions.

  • Anonymous

    Compassion sounds good. Ron Paul is only a few points shy of overtaking Obama. 

  • Anonymous

    Not in Maine.

  • Anonymous

    Well you must vote for yourself a great deal as most candidates are and have been Pro-Choice.

  • Anonymous

    Well let me say this MaryBelle. The slogan “these are not your fathers Democrats” resounds stronger than ever today. And the GOP isnt what it used to be either. But until the DNC boots Obama and the rest of the socialist class-warfare racists currently in office out on their rears like they should have, Im a hard-core GOP fan. They might be horrible too, but at least they dont envy my money and hate me because Im a white person, veteran and believe in God somewhat. The democrats act like those qualifications make me a terrorist. Why would I or anyone like me ever support them?

  • Anonymous

    That’s assuming she would do that.

  • Anonymous

    That’s assuming she would do that.

  • Anonymous

    That’s assuming she would do that.

  • Anonymous

    That’s assuming she would do that.

  • Anonymous

    That’s assuming she would do that.

  • Anonymous

    How exactly does one VOTE to start an “illegal” war? That propaganda is almost laughable. Even the UN supported those “illegal” wars, as well as the democrats. But yeah, it was all Bush. He lied about the intel that the dems also got to see. I love it how anything a liberal doesnt like suddenly becomes “illegal”.

  • Anonymous

    I don’t seem to  recall who flew two planes into the WTC and one into the Pentagon? Do you?

    I also don’t seem to recall who hijacked that third plane that the passengers attempted to take control of before it crashed in that Pennsylvania field? Do you?

  • Anonymous

    Or, we could ignore people on her staff who are paid to post comments about her on the BDN web site.

  • Anonymous

    Yet if Richard were expousing the liberal viewpoint with his poor grammar, at least then you wouldnt be making fun of him right?

  • Anonymous

    It’s over…..she is has allowed Boehner and the radical wackos of her party to rule, and the people of Maine will not forget. Collins will be next.

  • Anonymous

    Obamacare would have come out of committee via procedural maneuver. It would have gotten it to the floor. The 2006 and 2008 elections made this inevitable and Olympia traded her vote to extract large amounts of negative components to the legislation. Olympia was not the only person in the world with power over this legislation. I can explain this to you…I cannot comprehend it for you. We should both be worried about the real liberals anyways-not those on our own team.

  • Anonymous

    Hmmmm I wonder who you look like?

  • listenuppeople

    she voted for obama care.. so what other point do you want to make

  • Anonymous

    Can anyone explain to me how it is constitutionaly legal to have term limits on the executive branch and none on the legislative branch ? We don’t need career politicians, we need term limits ! Something about absolute power absolutely corrupting rings a bell. Their all to cozy with the lobbyist’s. Voting themselves the best retirement,healthcare benefits etc…
     The founding fathers considered it a public service ! Not a golden ticket to riches on the backs of the constituants.
     Did you all know Teddy Chappaqudick from Mass had a capitol hill staff of 470+ federal employees ? WHY ? Think about that for minute …. X 100 senators + 435 Reps !!
    Its way out of control !!
    SORRY ! I could go on, but I’ll stop for now
    ALL INCUMBENTS OUT !
    THEY AND THEY ALONE PUT IN THIS HOLE !

  • Anonymous

    So maybe you will tell us what is wrong with cutting spending and increasing taxes on the top 2%.  We sure can’t keep spending the way we have over the past 10 years and we cannot pay down the debt if we don’t have the revenue to do it with.

  • Anonymous

    So maybe you will tell us what is wrong with cutting spending and increasing taxes on the top 2%.  We sure can’t keep spending the way we have over the past 10 years and we cannot pay down the debt if we don’t have the revenue to do it with.

  • Anonymous

    So maybe you will tell us what is wrong with cutting spending and increasing taxes on the top 2%.  We sure can’t keep spending the way we have over the past 10 years and we cannot pay down the debt if we don’t have the revenue to do it with.

  • Anonymous

    I was wondering the same thing, but will leave it to the imagination!

  • listenuppeople

    Bush had a demcratic congress for the last 6 years of his terms.. Congress made the laws that got this country in the mess we’re in… Bush didn’t do anything with domestic policy, nothing heck he left in half of Bill Clintons cabinet… he was only intrested in the war machine… blame the rightful heirs to our problems on the Dems please…

  • ChuckGG

    Certainly, that excludes me.  I’m just a traditional Republican, known by the Tea Party crowd as a RINO.   You may remember us – we are the ones who actually know about Paul Revere’s ride, what the difference is between Concord, NH, and Concord, MA, and have an understanding of history that extends beyond yesterday’s lunch menu.

  • Anonymous

    Well, Jason I would not jump to conclusions about that. I am a Democrat and I like our President.  However, I also have some Republicans (moderates) I admire. Bill Cohen (no longer in politics ) is a big one, and some in the past. I also like quite a lot about Senators Collins and Snowe (no, I do not always agree with their votes, but I do admire them for many reasons.)
    So, no, I was not paid to do that, and yet I posted some positives.  Just so you know….

  • listenuppeople

    We need a no compromise candidate on the republican side…  not what snowe does here is how I see her working…… I will give you five yes’es    if someone will sponsor and congress aprove a educational program that my husband can sell for 125 million after just 2 years of growth….

  • Anonymous

    Come election day, I’ll be voting “straight ticket” as I’ve done the last several elections.  In this case “straight ticket” isn’t being “loyal” to one party or the other, it’s voting completely anti-incumbent.  If enough other folks did likewise, we might actually see some real change in Washington…but I doubt it.

  • Anonymous

    Yeah, well…..I am sure glad most people vote for a candidate based on more than just one issue.

  • Anonymous

    He made the decisions that got us in this mess. Will please get a grip and stop the lies.

  • Anonymous

    Where the heck do you come up with some of this stuff? Obama will most definitely be the Democratic candidate, and most liberals and  Democrats are still for him. They would not vote for the alternative.
    You are not correct about that and I can bet you , you will find that out.

  • Anonymous

    “Using trumped up crisis to raid the public purse and attack the basic rights and benefits is a very old trick – but rarely is the shock doctrine tactic wielded as brazenly as in the pseudo debate about the debt ceiling. This is naked class war, waged by the ultra rich against everyone else, and it’s well past time for Americans to draw the line.”

    Naomi Klein..Shock Doctrine

  • Anonymous

    You’d better look up the amount of years that Bush had a Democratic congress; you’re not even half right.

  • Anonymous

    You’d better look up the amount of years that Bush had a Democratic congress; you’re not even half right.

  • Anonymous

    Turn off Fox News. 

    I am a progressive along the lines of Bernie Sanders. Read progressive blogs all the time. Being jealous of people with money is not progressive. It is propaganda put out by Rupert Murdoch. …who is in a world of hurt for phone hacking and bribing police in England.

    Some of my best friends have been wealthy..I never held it against them. Practically all my family except the parents. Not a big deal.

  • Anonymous

    Reading progressive blogs. Lots of democrats are not pleased with Obama’s bending over for republicans and putting down his base. Let’s not get into it Lynne, everybody is different. 

  • Anonymous

    I am so glad Fox News is going down. Disinformation. Snowe loved the bush policies, which were so far to the right , the country never got over it. Down the tubes.

  • Anonymous

    I don’t mean to burst your bubble but there is no election this November.

  • Anonymous

    Clinton tried to warn bush about the terrorist problems, he didn’t listen. There are still unanswered questions about 9/11. Bush said he wanted to invade Iraq when he was gov. of Texas. Something about insulting his daddy and having oil, I think it was.

  • Anonymous

    Funding the illegal wars. You need to find out what is propaganda.It took many votes, as the wars were not in the budget.

  • Anonymous

    There is nothing moderate about Snowe except she doesn’t raise her voice and she sounds intelligent. Votes strictly party line. Fascist.

  • Anonymous

    When they feed at the trough, pig should be the name.

  • Anonymous

    It is a far cry from the Republican party I signed on for. ”

    “We used to have skilled debaters and intelligent, erudite,  polished statesmen, diplomats and politicians.  We never heard about all this religious claptrap we now hear from the Tea Party Express.  Religion was for churches and had nothing to do with our secular society.  Decisions were based upon facts and not divine intervention.”

    I remember those days too. When we had a real two party system that worked.

  • Anonymous

    It is a far cry from the Republican party I signed on for. ”

    “We used to have skilled debaters and intelligent, erudite,  polished statesmen, diplomats and politicians.  We never heard about all this religious claptrap we now hear from the Tea Party Express.  Religion was for churches and had nothing to do with our secular society.  Decisions were based upon facts and not divine intervention.”

    I remember those days too. When we had a real two party system that worked.

  • http://pulse.yahoo.com/_JEEBL24CJFPKONGDGBVLUF44LU Violet

    Wow Chuck . . . . what world are you living in . . . . I see that our country is broke right now and Snowe is part of this problem.

    I am a “Constitutional Conservative” and Snowe is everything but this, my friend.

    Seems that you hate the Tea Party and are afraid of it in some weird way . . . . let me break it down for you . . . . TEA stands for “Taxed Enough Already”.  What is nutty about that?

    I own my own business . . . . do you?  Snowe’s votes have harmed my business and family.  She is done . . . I am sick and tired of getting form letters from her signed by an autopen everytime I call her office to ask her to vote on conservative principles. 

    We need someone new as our Senator.   I will be voting for Scott D’Amboise in the primary.

  • http://pulse.yahoo.com/_JEEBL24CJFPKONGDGBVLUF44LU Violet

    Wow Chuck . . . . what world are you living in . . . . I see that our country is broke right now and Snowe is part of this problem.

    I am a “Constitutional Conservative” and Snowe is everything but this, my friend.

    Seems that you hate the Tea Party and are afraid of it in some weird way . . . . let me break it down for you . . . . TEA stands for “Taxed Enough Already”.  What is nutty about that?

    I own my own business . . . . do you?  Snowe’s votes have harmed my business and family.  She is done . . . I am sick and tired of getting form letters from her signed by an autopen everytime I call her office to ask her to vote on conservative principles. 

    We need someone new as our Senator.   I will be voting for Scott D’Amboise in the primary.

  • http://pulse.yahoo.com/_JEEBL24CJFPKONGDGBVLUF44LU Violet

    Wow Chuck . . . . what world are you living in . . . . I see that our country is broke right now and Snowe is part of this problem.

    I am a “Constitutional Conservative” and Snowe is everything but this, my friend.

    Seems that you hate the Tea Party and are afraid of it in some weird way . . . . let me break it down for you . . . . TEA stands for “Taxed Enough Already”.  What is nutty about that?

    I own my own business . . . . do you?  Snowe’s votes have harmed my business and family.  She is done . . . I am sick and tired of getting form letters from her signed by an autopen everytime I call her office to ask her to vote on conservative principles. 

    We need someone new as our Senator.   I will be voting for Scott D’Amboise in the primary.

  • http://pulse.yahoo.com/_JEEBL24CJFPKONGDGBVLUF44LU Violet

    Wow Chuck . . . . what world are you living in . . . . I see that our country is broke right now and Snowe is part of this problem.

    I am a “Constitutional Conservative” and Snowe is everything but this, my friend.

    Seems that you hate the Tea Party and are afraid of it in some weird way . . . . let me break it down for you . . . . TEA stands for “Taxed Enough Already”.  What is nutty about that?

    I own my own business . . . . do you?  Snowe’s votes have harmed my business and family.  She is done . . . I am sick and tired of getting form letters from her signed by an autopen everytime I call her office to ask her to vote on conservative principles. 

    We need someone new as our Senator.   I will be voting for Scott D’Amboise in the primary.

  • http://pulse.yahoo.com/_JEEBL24CJFPKONGDGBVLUF44LU Violet

    Wow Chuck . . . . what world are you living in . . . . I see that our country is broke right now and Snowe is part of this problem.

    I am a “Constitutional Conservative” and Snowe is everything but this, my friend.

    Seems that you hate the Tea Party and are afraid of it in some weird way . . . . let me break it down for you . . . . TEA stands for “Taxed Enough Already”.  What is nutty about that?

    I own my own business . . . . do you?  Snowe’s votes have harmed my business and family.  She is done . . . I am sick and tired of getting form letters from her signed by an autopen everytime I call her office to ask her to vote on conservative principles. 

    We need someone new as our Senator.   I will be voting for Scott D’Amboise in the primary.

  • Anonymous

    Yes Clinton did attempt to tell Bush about the terrorist problems. Clinton also was offered bin Laden on a silver platter and chose to not take him into custody.

    But what I am really interested in is your “There are still unanswered questions about 9/11″ comment. Care to elaborate?

  • Anonymous

    Yes Clinton did attempt to tell Bush about the terrorist problems. Clinton also was offered bin Laden on a silver platter and chose to not take him into custody.

    But what I am really interested in is your “There are still unanswered questions about 9/11″ comment. Care to elaborate?

  • Anonymous

    Just move to Maine from Norway?

  • Anonymous

    Just move to Maine from Norway?

  • Anonymous

    Just move to Maine from Norway?

  • Anonymous

    Just move to Maine from Norway?

  • Anonymous

    Just move to Maine from Norway?

  • Anonymous

    Just move to Maine from Norway?

  • Anonymous

    I think this time around Sen. Snowe has to deal with both Republicans who want her seat and Democrats who don’t want to see the health care law repealed. Between those two factions, she will have tough competition.

  • Anonymous

    I think this time around Sen. Snowe has to deal with both Republicans who want her seat and Democrats who don’t want to see the health care law repealed. Between those two factions, she will have tough competition.

  • Anonymous

    I think this time around Sen. Snowe has to deal with both Republicans who want her seat and Democrats who don’t want to see the health care law repealed. Between those two factions, she will have tough competition.

  • Anonymous

    I think this time around Sen. Snowe has to deal with both Republicans who want her seat and Democrats who don’t want to see the health care law repealed. Between those two factions, she will have tough competition.

  • Anonymous

    Don’t undermine your competition. A Democrat can change parties for the purpose of influencing the outcome of the opposition’s primary. It’s been done.

  • Anonymous

    Amen to that!

  • Anonymous

    So true. 

    Nixon’s domestic policy would be considered too lefty to get the democratic nomination for president now a days.

  • Anonymous

    CNN is fox news lite. Turn on Current TV. 

  • http://www.facebook.com/profile.php?id=1830222079 Brett Kirschbaum

    sad thing is non of them care about the people they are suppose to represent,  they jsut care about their own income, don’t think so look at the average senates income vs what they get paid  and ask how they are turning couple hundred k into millions.   They are all corrupted by power, term limits would help stop this  and it is the only way to get true for the people by the people reps. 

  • Anonymous

    Sarcasm?  Attempt at humor?  Both?

  • Anonymous

    The middle of the road is one of the reasons we have no democratic party left. DLC is the middle of the road/corporatist  party.

  • Anonymous

    As a progressive, I thought Obamacare was a big win for health care industries and unconstitutional. With fair elections, don’t think Obama could be reelected.

  • ChuckGG

    I do not think many people “like” abortion but as you stated, making it illegal would drive it underground and endanger women with the back-alley abortions of yesteryear.  No, it needs to remain legal and safe but with an emphasis on preventing pregnancies first.

    As born-again Christian, Dr. C. Everett Koop, former U. S. Surgeon General so aptly stated, “If you want to get rid of abortion, stop unwanted pregnancies.”  And, of course, he is correct in most cases.  Situations such as rape, incest, and danger to the mother, and so forth, are a few of those exceptions.

    However, the people who are so heavily anti-abortion also happen to be the most conservative when it comes to contraception and birth-control options.  In this day and age, it seems almost impossible to understand why an unwanted pregnancy should occur (but, of course, they do).  If the conservative, religious crowd would allow sex education and availability to contraception there would be a much reduced occurrence of abortion used as a birth control technique.  But, instead, they clutch their bibles and ramble on about “abstinence.”  Oh, sure, and how many babies are there resulting from that birth control technique?  Add in the dusty old edicts from an equally dusty old institution, the Catholic church, with their “mortal sin” punishments for any couple that uses contraceptives, and it is little wonder Catholic families tend to have  many children.  But, of course, it serves the church not at all to limit the number of future members.

    So, reduction of abortions is simple – provide sex education and contraceptives, provide alternatives such as adoption, and tell the religious conservative crowd to try to get into the 21st century (as hard as that might be).

  • Anonymous

    Yep. That’s the only way to balance a budget. The GOP says we ought to run government like a business. Well, cutting expenses and increasing prices is how a business balances its budget. But the GOP only want to sell us on cutting spending and then blow smoke up our noses when we tell them to pay more in tax, which is the government’s way of increasing prices.

  • Anonymous

    And who pays you?

  • Anonymous

    We need a fiscally conservative party that is in the 21st century. ie. all the industrialized countries have universal health care in various forms but US.

    Third parties and fair elections are not welcome in our US form of democracy.

  • Anonymous

    We need a fiscally conservative party that is in the 21st century. ie. all the industrialized countries have universal health care in various forms but US.

    Third parties and fair elections are not welcome in our US form of democracy.

  • Anonymous

    She may be too liberal for ME then. Since we have LePage for a governor.

  • Anonymous

    She may be too liberal for ME then. Since we have LePage for a governor.

  • Anonymous

    She may be too liberal for ME then. Since we have LePage for a governor.

  • Anonymous

    Brilliant.

  • Anonymous

    Good. But who could take her place for someone like you? Tea Party? Voted with bush to strip the constitution and give money hand over fist to the military industrial complex. Seems like a far right conservative to me.

  • Anonymous

    Good. But who could take her place for someone like you? Tea Party? Voted with bush to strip the constitution and give money hand over fist to the military industrial complex. Seems like a far right conservative to me.

  • Anonymous

    Good. But who could take her place for someone like you? Tea Party? Voted with bush to strip the constitution and give money hand over fist to the military industrial complex. Seems like a far right conservative to me.

  • Anonymous

    Why should old white men in DC tell a woman what to do with her body. What if women wanted the pharmaceutical industry to stop producing Viagra? Same thing.

  • Anonymous

    I hope to like heck she is not elected. She has been impersonating a republican for a very long time. Her and Collins are both jokes. It is about time Maine voted in a Tea Party candidate anyway. Only then will they stop being the worst free loading welfare state in the union…

  • Anonymous

    Speaking of unicorns and rainbows …

  • Anonymous

    Why stop with birth. If the govt. keeps a child from starving that is welfare . Corporations paying no taxes is a good thing. Not welfare. Go figure.

  • Anonymous

    “cut off your nose to spite your face …” (?)

  • Anonymous

    “cut off your nose to spite your face …” (?)

  • Anonymous

    There is a difference in Maine republicans. Used to be the way DC worked. Two party system. Democrats stood for something besides being corporate shills too.

  • Anonymous

    There is a difference in Maine republicans. Used to be the way DC worked. Two party system. Democrats stood for something besides being corporate shills too.

  • Anonymous

    There is a difference in Maine republicans. Used to be the way DC worked. Two party system. Democrats stood for something besides being corporate shills too.

  • Anonymous

    There is a difference in Maine republicans. Used to be the way DC worked. Two party system. Democrats stood for something besides being corporate shills too.

  • Anonymous

    I agree with you. Incumbents have been bad for the country.

  • Anonymous

    I agree with you. Incumbents have been bad for the country.

  • Anonymous

    I agree with you. Incumbents have been bad for the country.

  • Anonymous

    I agree with you. Incumbents have been bad for the country.

  • Anonymous

    I agree with you. Incumbents have been bad for the country.

  • Anonymous

    I agree with you. Incumbents have been bad for the country.

  • ChuckGG

    I would be curious to hear what your solution to unwanted pregnancy is.  Do you favor adoption instead?  Do you favor sex education and availability of contraceptives to lessen the occurrence of abortion?  Do you believe abstinence actually is followed and thus is an effective option to prevent unwanted pregnancies?

    I cannot believe that you believe if you outlaw abortion you think that will stop abortion.  Before Roe v. Wade, back-alley abortions killed women on a regular basis.   Go watch “Cider House Rules,” filmed in Maine (I think) for a “more truth than fiction” account of young women who found themselves “in the family way,” as they used to call it.

    For me, I am glad to see those days of back-alley abortions and societal shame against pregnant women to be an item of the past. 

    I do not believe anyone likes abortion nor do they believe it should be used as birth control but as long as the ultra-conservative religious crowd continues its efforts to prevent sex education and limit access to effective contraception, you will continue to have unwanted pregnancies, and subsequently, abortions.

  • ChuckGG

    I would be curious to hear what your solution to unwanted pregnancy is.  Do you favor adoption instead?  Do you favor sex education and availability of contraceptives to lessen the occurrence of abortion?  Do you believe abstinence actually is followed and thus is an effective option to prevent unwanted pregnancies?

    I cannot believe that you believe if you outlaw abortion you think that will stop abortion.  Before Roe v. Wade, back-alley abortions killed women on a regular basis.   Go watch “Cider House Rules,” filmed in Maine (I think) for a “more truth than fiction” account of young women who found themselves “in the family way,” as they used to call it.

    For me, I am glad to see those days of back-alley abortions and societal shame against pregnant women to be an item of the past. 

    I do not believe anyone likes abortion nor do they believe it should be used as birth control but as long as the ultra-conservative religious crowd continues its efforts to prevent sex education and limit access to effective contraception, you will continue to have unwanted pregnancies, and subsequently, abortions.

  • ChuckGG

    I would be curious to hear what your solution to unwanted pregnancy is.  Do you favor adoption instead?  Do you favor sex education and availability of contraceptives to lessen the occurrence of abortion?  Do you believe abstinence actually is followed and thus is an effective option to prevent unwanted pregnancies?

    I cannot believe that you believe if you outlaw abortion you think that will stop abortion.  Before Roe v. Wade, back-alley abortions killed women on a regular basis.   Go watch “Cider House Rules,” filmed in Maine (I think) for a “more truth than fiction” account of young women who found themselves “in the family way,” as they used to call it.

    For me, I am glad to see those days of back-alley abortions and societal shame against pregnant women to be an item of the past. 

    I do not believe anyone likes abortion nor do they believe it should be used as birth control but as long as the ultra-conservative religious crowd continues its efforts to prevent sex education and limit access to effective contraception, you will continue to have unwanted pregnancies, and subsequently, abortions.

  • ChuckGG

    I would be curious to hear what your solution to unwanted pregnancy is.  Do you favor adoption instead?  Do you favor sex education and availability of contraceptives to lessen the occurrence of abortion?  Do you believe abstinence actually is followed and thus is an effective option to prevent unwanted pregnancies?

    I cannot believe that you believe if you outlaw abortion you think that will stop abortion.  Before Roe v. Wade, back-alley abortions killed women on a regular basis.   Go watch “Cider House Rules,” filmed in Maine (I think) for a “more truth than fiction” account of young women who found themselves “in the family way,” as they used to call it.

    For me, I am glad to see those days of back-alley abortions and societal shame against pregnant women to be an item of the past. 

    I do not believe anyone likes abortion nor do they believe it should be used as birth control but as long as the ultra-conservative religious crowd continues its efforts to prevent sex education and limit access to effective contraception, you will continue to have unwanted pregnancies, and subsequently, abortions.

  • ChuckGG

    I would be curious to hear what your solution to unwanted pregnancy is.  Do you favor adoption instead?  Do you favor sex education and availability of contraceptives to lessen the occurrence of abortion?  Do you believe abstinence actually is followed and thus is an effective option to prevent unwanted pregnancies?

    I cannot believe that you believe if you outlaw abortion you think that will stop abortion.  Before Roe v. Wade, back-alley abortions killed women on a regular basis.   Go watch “Cider House Rules,” filmed in Maine (I think) for a “more truth than fiction” account of young women who found themselves “in the family way,” as they used to call it.

    For me, I am glad to see those days of back-alley abortions and societal shame against pregnant women to be an item of the past. 

    I do not believe anyone likes abortion nor do they believe it should be used as birth control but as long as the ultra-conservative religious crowd continues its efforts to prevent sex education and limit access to effective contraception, you will continue to have unwanted pregnancies, and subsequently, abortions.

  • ChuckGG

    I would be curious to hear what your solution to unwanted pregnancy is.  Do you favor adoption instead?  Do you favor sex education and availability of contraceptives to lessen the occurrence of abortion?  Do you believe abstinence actually is followed and thus is an effective option to prevent unwanted pregnancies?

    I cannot believe that you believe if you outlaw abortion you think that will stop abortion.  Before Roe v. Wade, back-alley abortions killed women on a regular basis.   Go watch “Cider House Rules,” filmed in Maine (I think) for a “more truth than fiction” account of young women who found themselves “in the family way,” as they used to call it.

    For me, I am glad to see those days of back-alley abortions and societal shame against pregnant women to be an item of the past. 

    I do not believe anyone likes abortion nor do they believe it should be used as birth control but as long as the ultra-conservative religious crowd continues its efforts to prevent sex education and limit access to effective contraception, you will continue to have unwanted pregnancies, and subsequently, abortions.

  • Anonymous

    I agree with CGC.  Start your own party.  See how far you get.

  • Anonymous

    Not to be rude, but this is a blog and I can post as much as you do (within the guidelines.)

    Once again, Obama will be the Democratic candidate and most Democrats and progressives will vote for him. Wait and see. They will not want the alternative. They are just frustrated now with all the conciliations that are not going anywhere.

  • Anonymous

    The problem started in 1999 with the repeal of Glass-Stegall. That law kept the banking industry from investing in Wall Street etc. FDR put the law into place so we would never have another depression. Republican congress and democratic president made it into law. 

    Now the banks gamble with your money like they live in Las Vegas and the tax payers bail them out.

  • Anonymous

    And start another party because the republicans are not any better than dems.

  • http://pulse.yahoo.com/_JEEBL24CJFPKONGDGBVLUF44LU Violet

    And for the record . . . . a real conservative is never “moderate”.  I am  Fiscally Conservative as well . . . . Snowe’s voting record with regards to TARP and the STIMULUS shows that she is anything but that. 

    As far as being Pragmatic and Intellectual . . .  you can see what our President has done with that behind him.  I never, ever want to see another President, Senator or Congressman elected on those principles . . . .  I want to see where a candidate stands on the issues.  I will never again vote for a career politician . . . . esp. those that have went to a liberal Ivy League College.  I will vote for a business owner, farmer, fisherman, veteran,  etc. . . . over that kind of resume.  At least that person will understand our Middle Class and protect us from the leeches in Washington, DC.

    We need jobs . . . . and Snowe has done everything to back those who want to take those from us.

  • http://pulse.yahoo.com/_JEEBL24CJFPKONGDGBVLUF44LU Violet

    No . . .  it is time to fundamentally bring the party back to it’s Republican roots.  It needs to be cleansed from within:)

  • Anonymous

    Damn, that is so true.  Great comment!

  • Anonymous

    Religion, religion, corporate interests.  You sound like a true right-wing conservative. 

  • Anonymous

    Religion, religion, corporate interests.  You sound like a true right-wing conservative. 

  • Anonymous

    Religion, religion, corporate interests.  You sound like a true right-wing conservative. 

  • Anonymous

    Religion, religion, corporate interests.  You sound like a true right-wing conservative. 

  • Anonymous

    Religion, religion, corporate interests.  You sound like a true right-wing conservative. 

  • Anonymous

    Emily Cain is the primary reason why Maine’s state government didn’t shutdown like Minnesota’s.  She could have easily pulled the Republican strategy of just say ‘no’ like Boehner did in 2009 – 2010, but she didn’t.  Inexperienced, you bet.  But 10 years from now, she could easily be the first woman governor of Maine.  Smart, articulate, seeks compromise with opponents, wants to get things done for Maine.

  • Anonymous

    Gawd, it would be great if you knew what you were talking about.  As long as someone is picking up the check for healthcare (the federal government), prices will continue to rise and insurance companies (the middle men) will get their 35%  cut in administration fees (federal government 5%) for shuffling paperwork and deciding if your procedure is covered or not.

  • ChuckGG

    Actually, Violet, I do own my own company – have since 1984.  I do IT consulting work on various projects.   Have been happily in the six-figures annually ever since, thank-you.

    The basis for the TEA party was about taxes but if you look at the taxes over the years and under Clinton, I personally never had any complaints about the amount I was taxed.  What troubled me was how the money was spent.  It does not seem to me that we get much for our tax dollars.  I want to see infrastructure improvements, high-speed rail, improved electrical grid, more money spent on science and education.   Instead, funds for effective programs such as Head Start are cut and these are peanuts on the scale of things.  You really need to travel to Europe and China and take a look at their cities.  As Tom Friedman of the NY Times commented on Charlie Rose about his flight from Europe to JFK, “It was like going from the Jetson’s to the Flintstone’s.”  And, that is the truth.  We no longer are on the cutting edge on technology as far as it being applied to day-to-day life in our communities.  Korea, as I recall, has more internet penetration than do we.  I mean, really, Korea???

    As a trickle-down Reagan Republican, I expected the extra funds retained by corporate America (due to decreased taxes and tax breaks) to be reinvested into industry here in the USA.  Sadly, that is not what happened.  Instead, billions of corporate dollars were not spent on brick-and-mortar but instead were dumped into the “easy path” of questionable financial instruments such as derivatives and worthless paper.   As our factories aged and were not upgraded, business moved offshore to become more competitive.   Business, and I am a big supporter of business and also of reality, will do what serves business best.  Risking funds in brick and mortar apparently was not it.

    Combine this with the our party’s deregulation effort and the country experienced everything from tainted lettuce to oil spills to financial collapse of Wall Street.  Explain how our regulators and investigators missed the BP shoddy workmanship and Bernie Madoff’s YEARS of financial shenanigans.   Underfunded and understaffed inspection agencies are to blame.

    I see too many people just parroting the rhetoric of the Tea Party.  I recently revamped our health insurance policy in light of the “Obamacare” changes and was able to save around $600/month in insurance costs.  I do wish the Tea Party crowd actually would look at Obamacare and see just how much of it has anything to do with a cost to the government.  Short of the mandate, I see nothing that involves the government.  It all looks like private insurance to me and that certainly is what it is in our case.  We now are able to purchase lower-cost, high-deductible insurance because there are no caps on coverage and limits on procedures.  We pay for routine procedures out of pocket using HSA accounts.  It’s a great deal for us and has saved us a ton of money.

    I do not see our country as broken.  I see it as dragging its feet.  I want more done and done now.

    As far as the Tea Party goes, the concept is noble but somewhat misguided and uninformed.  I make a distinction between the Tea Party and the Tea Party Express.  The Tea Party appears to be focused on solid fiscal issues.  The Tea Party Express, on the other hand, appears to be the 1980′s Religious Right, focused on social issues that mean nothing to our secular government and are a detrimental waste of time and effort.  The TPE is the real danger to our society.  The TP just needs more experience and awareness of how the world and in particular, the financial world, works.

  • ChuckGG

    Actually, Violet, I do own my own company – have since 1984.  I do IT consulting work on various projects.   Have been happily in the six-figures annually ever since, thank-you.

    The basis for the TEA party was about taxes but if you look at the taxes over the years and under Clinton, I personally never had any complaints about the amount I was taxed.  What troubled me was how the money was spent.  It does not seem to me that we get much for our tax dollars.  I want to see infrastructure improvements, high-speed rail, improved electrical grid, more money spent on science and education.   Instead, funds for effective programs such as Head Start are cut and these are peanuts on the scale of things.  You really need to travel to Europe and China and take a look at their cities.  As Tom Friedman of the NY Times commented on Charlie Rose about his flight from Europe to JFK, “It was like going from the Jetson’s to the Flintstone’s.”  And, that is the truth.  We no longer are on the cutting edge on technology as far as it being applied to day-to-day life in our communities.  Korea, as I recall, has more internet penetration than do we.  I mean, really, Korea???

    As a trickle-down Reagan Republican, I expected the extra funds retained by corporate America (due to decreased taxes and tax breaks) to be reinvested into industry here in the USA.  Sadly, that is not what happened.  Instead, billions of corporate dollars were not spent on brick-and-mortar but instead were dumped into the “easy path” of questionable financial instruments such as derivatives and worthless paper.   As our factories aged and were not upgraded, business moved offshore to become more competitive.   Business, and I am a big supporter of business and also of reality, will do what serves business best.  Risking funds in brick and mortar apparently was not it.

    Combine this with the our party’s deregulation effort and the country experienced everything from tainted lettuce to oil spills to financial collapse of Wall Street.  Explain how our regulators and investigators missed the BP shoddy workmanship and Bernie Madoff’s YEARS of financial shenanigans.   Underfunded and understaffed inspection agencies are to blame.

    I see too many people just parroting the rhetoric of the Tea Party.  I recently revamped our health insurance policy in light of the “Obamacare” changes and was able to save around $600/month in insurance costs.  I do wish the Tea Party crowd actually would look at Obamacare and see just how much of it has anything to do with a cost to the government.  Short of the mandate, I see nothing that involves the government.  It all looks like private insurance to me and that certainly is what it is in our case.  We now are able to purchase lower-cost, high-deductible insurance because there are no caps on coverage and limits on procedures.  We pay for routine procedures out of pocket using HSA accounts.  It’s a great deal for us and has saved us a ton of money.

    I do not see our country as broken.  I see it as dragging its feet.  I want more done and done now.

    As far as the Tea Party goes, the concept is noble but somewhat misguided and uninformed.  I make a distinction between the Tea Party and the Tea Party Express.  The Tea Party appears to be focused on solid fiscal issues.  The Tea Party Express, on the other hand, appears to be the 1980′s Religious Right, focused on social issues that mean nothing to our secular government and are a detrimental waste of time and effort.  The TPE is the real danger to our society.  The TP just needs more experience and awareness of how the world and in particular, the financial world, works.

  • ChuckGG

    Actually, Violet, I do own my own company – have since 1984.  I do IT consulting work on various projects.   Have been happily in the six-figures annually ever since, thank-you.

    The basis for the TEA party was about taxes but if you look at the taxes over the years and under Clinton, I personally never had any complaints about the amount I was taxed.  What troubled me was how the money was spent.  It does not seem to me that we get much for our tax dollars.  I want to see infrastructure improvements, high-speed rail, improved electrical grid, more money spent on science and education.   Instead, funds for effective programs such as Head Start are cut and these are peanuts on the scale of things.  You really need to travel to Europe and China and take a look at their cities.  As Tom Friedman of the NY Times commented on Charlie Rose about his flight from Europe to JFK, “It was like going from the Jetson’s to the Flintstone’s.”  And, that is the truth.  We no longer are on the cutting edge on technology as far as it being applied to day-to-day life in our communities.  Korea, as I recall, has more internet penetration than do we.  I mean, really, Korea???

    As a trickle-down Reagan Republican, I expected the extra funds retained by corporate America (due to decreased taxes and tax breaks) to be reinvested into industry here in the USA.  Sadly, that is not what happened.  Instead, billions of corporate dollars were not spent on brick-and-mortar but instead were dumped into the “easy path” of questionable financial instruments such as derivatives and worthless paper.   As our factories aged and were not upgraded, business moved offshore to become more competitive.   Business, and I am a big supporter of business and also of reality, will do what serves business best.  Risking funds in brick and mortar apparently was not it.

    Combine this with the our party’s deregulation effort and the country experienced everything from tainted lettuce to oil spills to financial collapse of Wall Street.  Explain how our regulators and investigators missed the BP shoddy workmanship and Bernie Madoff’s YEARS of financial shenanigans.   Underfunded and understaffed inspection agencies are to blame.

    I see too many people just parroting the rhetoric of the Tea Party.  I recently revamped our health insurance policy in light of the “Obamacare” changes and was able to save around $600/month in insurance costs.  I do wish the Tea Party crowd actually would look at Obamacare and see just how much of it has anything to do with a cost to the government.  Short of the mandate, I see nothing that involves the government.  It all looks like private insurance to me and that certainly is what it is in our case.  We now are able to purchase lower-cost, high-deductible insurance because there are no caps on coverage and limits on procedures.  We pay for routine procedures out of pocket using HSA accounts.  It’s a great deal for us and has saved us a ton of money.

    I do not see our country as broken.  I see it as dragging its feet.  I want more done and done now.

    As far as the Tea Party goes, the concept is noble but somewhat misguided and uninformed.  I make a distinction between the Tea Party and the Tea Party Express.  The Tea Party appears to be focused on solid fiscal issues.  The Tea Party Express, on the other hand, appears to be the 1980′s Religious Right, focused on social issues that mean nothing to our secular government and are a detrimental waste of time and effort.  The TPE is the real danger to our society.  The TP just needs more experience and awareness of how the world and in particular, the financial world, works.

  • ChuckGG

    Actually, Violet, I do own my own company – have since 1984.  I do IT consulting work on various projects.   Have been happily in the six-figures annually ever since, thank-you.

    The basis for the TEA party was about taxes but if you look at the taxes over the years and under Clinton, I personally never had any complaints about the amount I was taxed.  What troubled me was how the money was spent.  It does not seem to me that we get much for our tax dollars.  I want to see infrastructure improvements, high-speed rail, improved electrical grid, more money spent on science and education.   Instead, funds for effective programs such as Head Start are cut and these are peanuts on the scale of things.  You really need to travel to Europe and China and take a look at their cities.  As Tom Friedman of the NY Times commented on Charlie Rose about his flight from Europe to JFK, “It was like going from the Jetson’s to the Flintstone’s.”  And, that is the truth.  We no longer are on the cutting edge on technology as far as it being applied to day-to-day life in our communities.  Korea, as I recall, has more internet penetration than do we.  I mean, really, Korea???

    As a trickle-down Reagan Republican, I expected the extra funds retained by corporate America (due to decreased taxes and tax breaks) to be reinvested into industry here in the USA.  Sadly, that is not what happened.  Instead, billions of corporate dollars were not spent on brick-and-mortar but instead were dumped into the “easy path” of questionable financial instruments such as derivatives and worthless paper.   As our factories aged and were not upgraded, business moved offshore to become more competitive.   Business, and I am a big supporter of business and also of reality, will do what serves business best.  Risking funds in brick and mortar apparently was not it.

    Combine this with the our party’s deregulation effort and the country experienced everything from tainted lettuce to oil spills to financial collapse of Wall Street.  Explain how our regulators and investigators missed the BP shoddy workmanship and Bernie Madoff’s YEARS of financial shenanigans.   Underfunded and understaffed inspection agencies are to blame.

    I see too many people just parroting the rhetoric of the Tea Party.  I recently revamped our health insurance policy in light of the “Obamacare” changes and was able to save around $600/month in insurance costs.  I do wish the Tea Party crowd actually would look at Obamacare and see just how much of it has anything to do with a cost to the government.  Short of the mandate, I see nothing that involves the government.  It all looks like private insurance to me and that certainly is what it is in our case.  We now are able to purchase lower-cost, high-deductible insurance because there are no caps on coverage and limits on procedures.  We pay for routine procedures out of pocket using HSA accounts.  It’s a great deal for us and has saved us a ton of money.

    I do not see our country as broken.  I see it as dragging its feet.  I want more done and done now.

    As far as the Tea Party goes, the concept is noble but somewhat misguided and uninformed.  I make a distinction between the Tea Party and the Tea Party Express.  The Tea Party appears to be focused on solid fiscal issues.  The Tea Party Express, on the other hand, appears to be the 1980′s Religious Right, focused on social issues that mean nothing to our secular government and are a detrimental waste of time and effort.  The TPE is the real danger to our society.  The TP just needs more experience and awareness of how the world and in particular, the financial world, works.

  • ChuckGG

    True enough.  I remember as a kid having John Reed (R) as governor, Ed Muskie (D), Bill Cohen (R), and George Mitchell (D) -  (and many others) all working for the common good.  Very professional, polite, educated, and true gentlemen.  And, do not forget the Lady of the Senate with the rose – Margaret Chase Smith. 

    The buffoons I see in Congress today are far from gentlemen and gentlewomen, and probably have no concept of what it means.  It is as appalling as “reality television” – utterly no class.

  • Anonymous

    Since when did the Democrats ever have a filibuster-proof majority? The 111th Congress had 132 cloture motions, used only when the minority party slows down proceedings so badly with stalling tactics that nothing can get accomplished. The Repugnicans forced the Dems to need 60 votes on every appointment or bill and have maintained their “my-way-or-the-highway” approach to “governing” throughout Obama’s term.

    Too bad the Repugs haven’t offered any bills during this session so the Dems could turn the tables on them. They are still the of “no” unless it benefits only their own narrow-minded agenda.

  • http://www.facebook.com/profile.php?id=1261946888 Stephen Hellum

    I have always been pro choice . I made the choice 2 times in my life and I chose life and I am glad I did. It made for less fun and hard times but my kids are worth every min. of it. I also talked to 2 others in the same situation who went the other way.30 years later I think they made the best choice. They grew up more and got into a better situation, have children that are really cool. What I think should change is the dads imput in the choice thing.

  • Anonymous

    You can’t run a government like a business.  The goal of business is to run the largest profit it can attain. That’s not the purpose of a government.

  • Anonymous

    They say history is a pendulum. Maybe it is kids rebelling against parents. Certainly hope that civil discourse is in store for the next generation. 

    “Gotcha” politics serves no good. Long term thoughtful consideration of policy is so needed. That said. Maine is outstanding, to me, for not going in that direction before our present administration . Don’t think it will go over , but will do lasting harm to the republican party here. There should not be a national playbook. Different regions have different norms. Criticizing and minimizing entire groups of people is not winning friends.

    I see republican governors all over this country saying and doing the same things. Seems like there is  a need for new leaders and maybe some aides with sociology degrees.

  • Anonymous

    I took Time magazine and the Atlantic because the rates were dirt cheap. If I could have read an article as good as your comment, would have continued taking those magazines. For instance, I did not know there was anything good in obama care. That is good to know.Thank you for taking the time to comment here.

  • ChuckGG

    Actually, I have to disagree.  The real conservative movement holds its basis in the tenets of such well-known conservatives such as William F. Buckley, Jr., William Safire, and George Will, to name three.   If we go back to Barry Goldwater, likely considered today to be a liberal, was considered radical-right back in 1964.

    Therefore, I would say the real conservative, in fact, is a moderate.  The Tea Party crowd is  staunchly ideological and they soon will learn this will get them nowhere in the real world.

    I also disagree on Intellectual.  This is exactly what I want in a President.  I want someone who can see the whole picture and does not fly off the handle because of his uniformed view.  You cannot tell me that people like Palin and Bachmann have a clue about the world.  They cannot even get their history correct.   They are so out of touch with reality.

    Obama is far closer to understanding the middle class than any of the Tea Party crowd who fail to allow taxes on the super-wealthy to return to what they were under the Clinton administration.  Intellectual does not imply elitist.

    There must be something against intellectual people these days.  Would it help if Obama dumbed-down his speech to the level used by reality television?  Perhaps, that would make him more palatable to the masses?  When I was growing up, it was a goal to be as smart and as educated as you possibly could be.  Proper English, grammar, and diction were drilled into us.  These were traits to which we aspired.  Apparently, these days, it is “the dumber, the better.”  Do recall what Palin said.  She “didn’t mind history.”   Oh, as if knowing history is right up there with the knowing the TV Guide listings.  Utterly ludicrous.

  • Anonymous

    That’s exactly what the Republicans are doing in the recall elections in Wisconsin right now. Name a primary where the Dems have done this…

  • Anonymous

    MaryBelle and lynne14 could you two  please start your own blog page so this forum doesn’t become  MaryBelle/lynne14  101 comments on one story forum. 

  • Anonymous

    MaryBelle and lynne14 could you two  please start your own blog page so this forum doesn’t become  MaryBelle/lynne14  101 comments on one story forum. 

  • ChuckGG

    Thank you, MaryBelle.  I will say that the effort we did on insurance was significant.  We spent probably a month, off and on, going over the various types of policies.  I contacted a friend in the medical field and spent a good deal of time going over the types of policies.  She helped a great deal.  Essentially, we did our homework.

    It is sad, but it kind of reminds me of what we had to go through when the Bell system was deregulated.  One really needed to spend the time to determine where the saving were in order to get the best deal.  We had to do the same this time.  For some, this may be a daunting effort.  That’s the sad part.  They really need a consumer advocate to help them.

    Really, what it came down to is this:   With a high-deductible ($2500/p.a.) policy, we were able to get very good and complete coverage including dental checkups, vaccines, all tests and annual checkups – all the routine stuff – for a low monthly cost plus some minor co-pay per visit.   Obamacare put restrictions on all policies (leveling the playing field for all companies) stating no caps per procedure, no bans on kids and pre-existing conditions, etc.   With the high-deductible, you really are “self insuring” for most routine procedures and that is fine with me.

    We then obtained Health Savings Accounts (HSA) tied to the policy.  The HSA is funded with your PRE-tax dollars up to the maximum allowed per year (varies) which is intended to cover the large deductible.  That is easy to fund due to the significant decrease in monthly rates and is an adjustment to income providing a nice tax advantage.

     Furthermore, the funds roll-over each year and at a certain point can be invested in financial vehicles of your choice.  Also, the HSA funds can be used during the year to pay for other medical procedures and medications such as eyeglasses, contacts, exams, and such.  At 65 (I think) one can start spending HSA dollars for non-medical items without incurring any penalty, but you are susceptible to the income tax at that time, but presumably at 65 your tax rate is lower.

    For us, this works out fine but for people with chronic medical conditions or those who use medical facilities a great deal, it might not work.  Again, one must do their homework.  Oh, yes, our meds are covered with a co-pay and generics usually are supplied (which is fine with me).

    Thanks, again, for the kind words.
     

  • Anonymous

    What a load of garbage. You don’t even understand how the Affordable Healthcare Act works or strengthens the Medicare program for all seniors today and in the future. I suggest you do a little reading:  http://www.retiredamericans.org/issues/health-care-reform

  • Anonymous

    What a load of garbage. You don’t even understand how the Affordable Healthcare Act works or strengthens the Medicare program for all seniors today and in the future. I suggest you do a little reading:  http://www.retiredamericans.org/issues/health-care-reform

  • Anonymous

    40% of the stimulus was for tax cuts, a right wing staple….no need to cut spending?  latest democrat offer is to cut 2.7 trillion….trickle down (voodoo economics) and tax cuts for the wealthy have destroyed this country….i’m sure glad that we had the republican party fix everything after clinton……

  • http://www.facebook.com/people/Regina-Hosebeast/100002095287763 Regina Hosebeast

    Perhaps Olympia should spend some of the $ MILLIONS $ she and Jock have acquired ( from public service ) on the the hungry and desperate people she allegedly represents, instead of pursuing her own greedy, ambitious career. How can anyone of good conscience devote so much  money to a career when you could actually help keeping some kids from going hungry?

    I hope Susan Collins doesn’t follow the same self serving path. I knew Sam Collins personally and when he started S.W. Collins in Presque Isle, I don’t think this would set with him.

  • http://www.facebook.com/people/Regina-Hosebeast/100002095287763 Regina Hosebeast

    “She routinely votes against the Republican Party line and that roughly
    speaking, she thinks she runs the place and, in fact, she is not a
    Republican and she makes basically more Democrats happy than she does
    Republicans.”

    ” Snowe voted Obamacare out of committee. She was the first Republican to
    vote for Obamacare. That needs to be said. It’s, “Oh, she didn’t vote
    for it on the floor.” These are fundamental affronts to our personal
    liberty and for any Republican to have voted that out of committee, in
    the form that it was and it became — it’s just mind-boggling. Even if
    the Supreme Court overturns it and completely throws it away, that whole
    process was launched by Olympia Snowe voting it out of committee.”

    Send her into retirement. Don’t worry about her, she and Jock with will be enjoying mint juleps in the Caribbean somewhere.

  • Anonymous

    Taking away all the bickering, look at some evidence: Are you better off now than you were 4 years ago? Do you have faith in the future? Is the value of the dollar compared to other currencies dropping? Do you run your personal life the way the government does, borrowing beyond your ability to repay?
     If you are better off, if you do have faith in a happy safe future for your kids, if you do not see our money worth less, if you do spend spend spend without the ability to repay, then vote for the people who put you there. But if you are not one of these, it does not matter what party a politician is in. If the politician is responsible for this, if the politician lacks INTEGRITY, throw the bum out!

  • Anonymous

    Retire please.

  • Jazz11

    I believe there will be a ground-swell for any Democrat this year. The Tea-Party extremists have not yet destroyed our economy nor country and this year and next year they will go down in defeat.

  • Anonymous

    She’s running against an unemployed “freelance writer” who lives in his mother’s basement and a scofflaw who can’t seem to keep his driver’s license current because apparently the rules of us mere mortals don’t apply to him. She can save her money, she won’t need it this time around.

  • Anonymous

    Republicans only care about you when you’re in the womb, after that you can die anytime as far as they’re concerned.

  • Anonymous

    Indeed, Margaret Chase Smith is rolling over in her grave as we speak.

  • Moose

    She needs to retire along with Collins..)

  • Moose

    Does she even live Maine enough to consider it home..??) 

  • Anonymous

    Take away all the bickering! Look at the evidence: Are you better off now than you were 4 years ago? Do you have faith in the future? Is the value of the dollar compared to other currencies dropping? (I ate yesterday in Canada, and the USA price was 7% higher than the Canadian!)  Do you run your personal life the way the government does, borrowing beyond your ability to repay?
    It does not matter what party a politician is in. If the politician is responsible for this, if the politician lacks INTEGRITY, throw the bum out!

  • Anonymous

    Time for a change

  • SwiftyMorgain

         Obamas only real problem is that he tends to comprimise which used to be an attribute when working with moderates. I lieu of the radicals on the other side it has become a liability.

    Its good to know that Nancy is there to put him in his place!

  • SwiftyMorgain

    Make no mistake about it, she is a (Corporate) Republican.

    She just has a reasonable thought process!

  • SwiftyMorgain

    The Shadow government would love term limits!

    It makes no differance to them who is on the other end of thier strings!

  • SwiftyMorgain

    The Shadow government would love term limits!

    It makes no differance to them who is on the other end of thier strings!

  • SwiftyMorgain

    He is certainly a few points shy of something!

  • SwiftyMorgain

    Which party went to war in the wrong country and then lost track of  18 billion sent to rebuild it?

  • SwiftyMorgain

      You are absolutly correct. The radical ideology from the adolescene house newcomers is what is threatening the country’s  default.
       People won’t forget that in the next year.

      

  • SwiftyMorgain

    You dont suppose she voted using her own  mind and deductive reasoning rather than someone elses do you?

  • http://pulse.yahoo.com/_GBHAWY2DGMGS5W3VHFYLBPN7AU Jay C

    she had better hope that a debt ceiling vote is done soon then because every incumbent is vulnerable right now.

  • SwiftyMorgain

    And Wisconsin and New Jersey for the most Pathetic Governors!

  • Anonymous

    The presidential term limit was passed as a constitutional amendment after FDR died.  The GOP did not want another 3 or 4 term democrat.  The states ratified it and it’s law, but it was done for spite.

    Term limits already exist: it’s called voting and sadly many people do not vote.  That’s our biggest problem.  A lot of folks complain and debate, but unless they vote they should keep their mouths shut.

    While term limits may not be a good idea, there ought to be a way to limit how long you can serve after age 65.  It’s really scary to see so many old farts in congress who are in their 70′s, 80′s and even 90′s.  When it’s time to go, it’s time to go.

  • Anonymous

    I totally agree. The Republicans are not better than the Democrats.

  • Anonymous

    I totally agree. The Republicans are not better than the Democrats.

  • Anonymous

    I totally agree. The Republicans are not better than the Democrats.

  • Anonymous

    I totally agree. The Republicans are not better than the Democrats.

  • Anonymous

    HAHAHAHAHAHA…you know nothing about health insurers…paying out when  people are SICK is wasteful spending to them.

  • Anonymous

    Do you know that she and Jock do not spend money on the “hungry and desperate” or are you just making assumptions?

  • Anonymous

    Bring a viable “Tea Party” candidate and maybe you will have your wish. But the candidates that have been brought forward so far in many races have been, well interesting to say the least.

  • Anonymous

    Bring a viable “Tea Party” candidate and maybe you will have your wish. But the candidates that have been brought forward so far in many races have been, well interesting to say the least.

  • Anonymous

    Bring a viable “Tea Party” candidate and maybe you will have your wish. But the candidates that have been brought forward so far in many races have been, well interesting to say the least.

  • Anonymous

    And dads could take more responsibility for not becoming dads too soon too…so we agree.

  • Anonymous

    Garbage you say. The Alliance of Retired Americans is a union lobbyist organization. If ObamaCre is so great.. why did most of the unions get the white house infamous “Exemption” from having to be forced to sign up. Another case of Union leadership =99 .. Union members = 0.

  • Anonymous

    Thank you for your reply and insight and actually feel better because of it.
    I like Emily and I agree with you that experience and age will help her go
    through the slings and arrows thrown at the Democrats. I guess, just right
    now, with such nincompoops running the state I wish there was someone
    tougher. But maybe I’m completely wrong and she is the toughest opponent to
    be had to push back against the Know-Nothings. Thanks for your reply.

  • SwiftyMorgain
  • SwiftyMorgain

    How did the Tea Party spend $4 trillion dollars in less than 3 years??

    The real question is how did these do nothing Tax Dodgers get elected?

    Tell me what has the “Tea Party” actually done in the last Two years other than threaten the United States Economy with Temper Tantrums!

  • SwiftyMorgain

    How did the Tea Party spend $4 trillion dollars in less than 3 years??

    The real question is how did these do nothing Tax Dodgers get elected?

    Tell me what has the “Tea Party” actually done in the last Two years other than threaten the United States Economy with Temper Tantrums!

  • SwiftyMorgain

    How did the Tea Party spend $4 trillion dollars in less than 3 years??

    The real question is how did these do nothing Tax Dodgers get elected?

    Tell me what has the “Tea Party” actually done in the last Two years other than threaten the United States Economy with Temper Tantrums!

  • SwiftyMorgain

    How did the Tea Party spend $4 trillion dollars in less than 3 years??

    The real question is how did these do nothing Tax Dodgers get elected?

    Tell me what has the “Tea Party” actually done in the last Two years other than threaten the United States Economy with Temper Tantrums!

  • SwiftyMorgain

    How did the Tea Party spend $4 trillion dollars in less than 3 years??

    The real question is how did these do nothing Tax Dodgers get elected?

    Tell me what has the “Tea Party” actually done in the last Two years other than threaten the United States Economy with Temper Tantrums!

  • SwiftyMorgain

    How did the Tea Party spend $4 trillion dollars in less than 3 years??

    The real question is how did these do nothing Tax Dodgers get elected?

    Tell me what has the “Tea Party” actually done in the last Two years other than threaten the United States Economy with Temper Tantrums!

  • SwiftyMorgain

    How did the Tea Party spend $4 trillion dollars in less than 3 years??

    The real question is how did these do nothing Tax Dodgers get elected?

    Tell me what has the “Tea Party” actually done in the last Two years other than threaten the United States Economy with Temper Tantrums!

  • Anonymous

    Those are not talking points, they are the public voting record of the RINO Snowe

  • Anonymous

    Electing a Tea Party candidate to the US Senate will reform Augusta?  I’m missing something…………………

  • Anonymous

    The so-called back alley killing of the unborn babies was greatly exaggerated by the attorneys for Norma McCorvy( who stated in 1980′s that her suit was based on a lie), but the attorneys kept on with the case, and the liberals on the Supreme Court voted 5-4 to uphold the lie.
    So, as stated before, over 50,000,000 unborn babies who would have grown up to be doctors, lawyers, entrepreneurs, blue collar workers, teachers, etc. had their lives snuffed out because of a woman’s “choice” over the life that was within.  I, too, know women who regret the “choice” made to go to the Planned Parenthood clinic or the local doctor who decided that giving that “choice” was more important than standing up for the rights of the unborn.

  • Anonymous

    I am part of the “Snowe Removal” capaign and will do all I can to see that she is removed from office. RINOS will not get my vote!

  • http://twitter.com/DirigoBlue Gerald Weinand

    70% of the money Snowe has raised this election cycle has come from out of state:

    http://www.opensecrets.org/politicians/geog.php?cycle=2012&cid=N00000480&type=I

  • http://twitter.com/DirigoBlue Gerald Weinand

    Should Snowe lose the primary, she could still run as a write-in candidate, like Lisa Murkowski did in Alaska last year.

  • http://twitter.com/DirigoBlue Gerald Weinand

    40% of the $787 billion stimulus bill was in fact tax cuts insisted on by Republicans. Or, $315 billion didn’t go to shovel ready projects, or projects of any kind.

  • Anonymous

    Fine, then lets call the Dems communist and be done with it and their  “REDISTRIBUTION”  scheme’s.

  • Anonymous

    I think it is time to replace Snowe she has been in their long enough its time for some new blood and new ways, she has done here time now let’s move on, she has made enough money, and giving herself a raise every year just like the rest of them. People on soc sec have not had a raise in three years but the senators did not go without did they. And now they want to take more from us, cut soc sec, medicare and keep the tax break on for the rich and the richer. So much to be said about the poor and the middle class. We have been paving the road for these people long enough i say it is time to take the bull by the horn, and do something, instead of just talking about it.

  • Anonymous

    WHAT????? The Democrats controlled Maine for a long time, the Democrats controlled both houses of the US Congress, and the Tea Party is pretty new. So how can you come to your conclusion?

  • http://www.facebook.com/profile.php?id=719791897 Chris Grindle

    Better to redistribute the wealth to the mass’s than to redistribute it to the wealthiest among us.

  • Anonymous

    I am so tired of the old politics in Maine.  The president can only have 4-8 years.  This is the problem with  people like Snowe that keep getting re-elected,  changes will never come if we keep electing these same folks back into office.  This country and the State of Maine has some serious problems.   Name one thing  that Snowe has done for any of you?   Snowe has shown Maines her true colors. We have nothing to loose voting in somone else. Time to give someone else a chance who  “really’ cares about the state of Maine.  Those of you that want her re-elected please think before you make that click.  What has she done for you?

  • Anonymous

    Source: New York TimesGov. Paul LePage of Maine happened to be waiting for his flight at Augusta State Airport on a recent Saturday when the weekend crush began. A turboprop Pilatus PC-12 carrying Melissa Thomas, her daughter, her daughter’s friend and a pile of lacrosse equipment took off for their home in Connecticut, following the girls’ three-week stay at Camp All-Star in nearby Kents Hill, Me. Shortly after, a Cessna Citation Excel arrived, and a mother, a father and their 13-year-old daughter emerged carrying a pink sleeping bag and two large duffel bags, all headed to Camp Vega in Fayette.

  • Anonymous

    Why the top 2% who ALREADY pay over 10% of our taxes? Why not the welfare layabouts who have lived off US for decades and pay no taxes? Why dont the 47% who pay NOTHING pay THEIR FARE SHARE???

  • Anonymous

    Tax dodgers? You mean like Timmy Geithner our TREASURY secretary who cant manage to pay his own taxes? Or Charlie Rangel who helped write the corrupt tax laws we currently have and then FORGOT he had to pay taxes himself? Those sort of tax dodgers? I dont think your quite so swift there Morgain. You once again have confused the demoncrats with the Tea party. So let me make it easy for you.
    Demoncrats-dont pay taxes.
    Tea party-dont want to pay unfair taxes.

  • Anonymous

    Before Scott Brown was elected down in mass the Demoncrats had a filibuster proof majority in the Senate. In the house they had a large enough majority that they could have passed any bill they wanted. Like say….A BUDGET. Nahhh…thats not something we need to worry about right?? Obama and Harry and Nancy spend $4 trillion on union payoffs and dont even have a budget, and here you are trying to put it on the Tea party or GOP. Save it. Not buying it.

  • Anonymous

    So you are a commie like Bernie. Now your opinion means as much to me as his does. Nothing. Try buying a plane ticket to China. I bet you’ll LOVE the socialism there.

  • Anonymous

    Snowe was involoved in making clinics for the Mainecare patients.  These clinics  Brewer family practice, Penobscot family practice , old town.  Are not providing good patient care.  these poor patients come from miles around .These patients are treated as piece work  one problem at a time. and are billing the goverment  135.00 per visit.  These clinics  are the ones making money. These patients keep coming back.  1  3- times a week.  Isn’t this so nice to see where your tax dollars are going? 

  • Anonymous

    Common sense Americans dont wany anything to do with Mr. class warfare. Only the lefties still love this guy.

  • Anonymous

    Her vote affects every other citizen outside the state of Maine. She’s saying that all Maine people wanted Bamacare. We have it because of her. She knowingly cast the vote that got it out of committee and enabled it to go to the floor where she knew it would pass in a Democrat dominated Senate. Oh, but she’ll say she didn’t vote for it. She didn’t have to. Once it got to the floor it was given a pass. BY HER !!! It would have died in committee if she voted no. The biggest impact comes in 2014. Gauged that way by pro socialist Bamacare and his cohorts to be after re-election bids in 2012. THAT’S THE BAND WAGON SHE WAS ON AS A RINO.
    Her and Collins have been key to the Dems, when needed, to get what they want. They consistently go against the Party platform and have no allegiance to the Party. In some places you have to sign a Party Allegiance Pledge. The State committee should establish the pledge and let’s see if they sign on!!!
    Time for her and Collins to go. Being savvy politicians doesn’t make them good politicians. Now it’s a campaign game NOT how good they are.  

  • Anonymous

    Personally I’d rater have Snowe win in the primary guaranteeing a solid Republican seat which makes it more likely the Republicans can control Congress and the Presidency.

  • http://pulse.yahoo.com/_BMOQ5PNHSH4KE4VBJRAF2DAOTQ Grizz

    I have read these comments and I can’t stop chuckling. We here in Maine are attacking the goverment for spending, spending etc. and here we are a State that has 47% of it’s people on some sort of federal welfare or assistance and the other 53% are trying to keep their heads above water….. I am not critizing for being poor, or that one needs assistance. I am a combat wounded 100% service connected veteran. I am just pointing out that we have 50 states and the federal goverment can’t keep funding these programs unless they have the money to support them. So revenues have to be increased. But you are not going to see my Republican party increase revenues on the big corporate companies that pay 11% tax on their profits that they make overseas, and you and I get taxed over 50%….nooooooo corporate America are the ones that fund their campaigns to run for office again…..It is better to say NO! and no compromise and put this country in default so us combat wounded veterans don’t get our Social Security or disability pension. And I am just one of the 7 million….than it is to cut spending with good fisical tax increases on corporate America that is making record profits while everyone else including small businesses holding on by a thread….both parties are to blame for our debt….my party just needs to stop saying NO! to everything to protect their campaigns and their seat in goverment….they still get paid whether you and I don’t.  

  • http://pulse.yahoo.com/_BMOQ5PNHSH4KE4VBJRAF2DAOTQ Grizz

    I have read these comments and I can’t stop chuckling. We here in Maine are attacking the goverment for spending, spending etc. and here we are a State that has 47% of it’s people on some sort of federal welfare or assistance and the other 53% are trying to keep their heads above water….. I am not critizing for being poor, or that one needs assistance. I am a combat wounded 100% service connected veteran. I am just pointing out that we have 50 states and the federal goverment can’t keep funding these programs unless they have the money to support them. So revenues have to be increased. But you are not going to see my Republican party increase revenues on the big corporate companies that pay 11% tax on their profits that they make overseas, and you and I get taxed over 50%….nooooooo corporate America are the ones that fund their campaigns to run for office again…..It is better to say NO! and no compromise and put this country in default so us combat wounded veterans don’t get our Social Security or disability pension. And I am just one of the 7 million….than it is to cut spending with good fisical tax increases on corporate America that is making record profits while everyone else including small businesses holding on by a thread….both parties are to blame for our debt….my party just needs to stop saying NO! to everything to protect their campaigns and their seat in goverment….they still get paid whether you and I don’t.  

  • http://pulse.yahoo.com/_BMOQ5PNHSH4KE4VBJRAF2DAOTQ Grizz

    I have read these comments and I can’t stop chuckling. We here in Maine are attacking the goverment for spending, spending etc. and here we are a State that has 47% of it’s people on some sort of federal welfare or assistance and the other 53% are trying to keep their heads above water….. I am not critizing for being poor, or that one needs assistance. I am a combat wounded 100% service connected veteran. I am just pointing out that we have 50 states and the federal goverment can’t keep funding these programs unless they have the money to support them. So revenues have to be increased. But you are not going to see my Republican party increase revenues on the big corporate companies that pay 11% tax on their profits that they make overseas, and you and I get taxed over 50%….nooooooo corporate America are the ones that fund their campaigns to run for office again…..It is better to say NO! and no compromise and put this country in default so us combat wounded veterans don’t get our Social Security or disability pension. And I am just one of the 7 million….than it is to cut spending with good fisical tax increases on corporate America that is making record profits while everyone else including small businesses holding on by a thread….both parties are to blame for our debt….my party just needs to stop saying NO! to everything to protect their campaigns and their seat in goverment….they still get paid whether you and I don’t.  

  • Anonymous

    With a president that is preaching mediocracy there will be no wealthy.Why strive for financial security if the government gaurantees it.

  • Anonymous

    With a president that is preaching mediocracy there will be no wealthy.Why strive for financial security if the government gaurantees it.

  • Anonymous

    With a president that is preaching mediocracy there will be no wealthy.Why strive for financial security if the government gaurantees it.

  • Anonymous

    With a president that is preaching mediocracy there will be no wealthy.Why strive for financial security if the government gaurantees it.

  • Anonymous

    obama is destroying the middle class with his redistribution through entitlement agenda.

  • Anonymous

    Too many potential votes not to put the checks “in the mail.” H’d be cutting his own throat. What the media doesnt tell you that if he doesn’t get his way raising the debt ceiling is that he controls the money. The debt ceiling has nothing to do with getting the money out. He does. He makes the decision where the limited money goes and he and his advisors are not about to throw potential votes away. It’s going to be a lot closer this time !!!! 

  • Anonymous

    What about the 40% or more that pays no taxes.Ever get a job from a poor guy?

  • Anonymous

    What about the 40% or more that pays no taxes.Ever get a job from a poor guy?

  • Anonymous

    What about the 40% or more that pays no taxes.Ever get a job from a poor guy?

  • SwiftyMorgain

    See! You proved my point.
     
    More Diversions and Temper Tantrums!
     
    Now just man up and Pay “Your” Taxes!

  • SwiftyMorgain

    See! You proved my point.
     
    More Diversions and Temper Tantrums!
     
    Now just man up and Pay “Your” Taxes!

  • SwiftyMorgain

    See! You proved my point.
     
    More Diversions and Temper Tantrums!
     
    Now just man up and Pay “Your” Taxes!

  • Anonymous

    over a year of complete dem control and they got nothing constructive done.

  • Anonymous

    over a year of complete dem control and they got nothing constructive done.

  • Anonymous

    over a year of complete dem control and they got nothing constructive done.

  • SwiftyMorgain

    Ever get a job from a poor guy?

    Everybody has!

    Without consumption nobody has a job!

    Even Homeless Drunks contribute to the “distillery workers” job!

    The supposed Wealthy Job creators don’t create “jobs”, they just siphon a profit out of the demand that already exists.

  • Anonymous

    Of course out of state tea party groups are going to come for Snowe and attack her. What do you expect from the people that spent the last two years debating where the President was born?

  • Anonymous

    Of course out of state tea party groups are going to come for Snowe and attack her. What do you expect from the people that spent the last two years debating where the President was born?

  • Anonymous

    Of course out of state tea party groups are going to come for Snowe and attack her. What do you expect from the people that spent the last two years debating where the President was born?

  • Anonymous

    Of course out of state tea party groups are going to come for Snowe and attack her. What do you expect from the people that spent the last two years debating where the President was born?

  • Anonymous

    Of course out of state tea party groups are going to come for Snowe and attack her. What do you expect from the people that spent the last two years debating where the President was born?

  • Anonymous

    Of course out of state tea party groups are going to come for Snowe and attack her. What do you expect from the people that spent the last two years debating where the President was born?

  • Anonymous

    Once again, I say, do a little reading. The summation explains how the system works for ALL seniors, not just those with “cadillac” plans. Also, here is a link that explains why those exemptions were granted in the first place.  It was put in place to protect union members who had negotiated good health care plans in lieu of higher wages when they had collectively bargained a previous contract. The exemptions don’t take effect until 2018.
    http://www.healthcarelawreform.com/tags/labor-unions/

    All the money you claim can the ACA strips from Medicare to be used however is incorrect. It takes back the “free money” given to insurance companies under Medicare Advantage, not from senior benefits. This is why the insurance companies are fighting it so hard and spreading the misinformation. Of course, they don’t mention all the money they will reap as millions more people are required to have health insurance.

  • Anonymous

    Once again, I say, do a little reading. The summation explains how the system works for ALL seniors, not just those with “cadillac” plans. Also, here is a link that explains why those exemptions were granted in the first place.  It was put in place to protect union members who had negotiated good health care plans in lieu of higher wages when they had collectively bargained a previous contract. The exemptions don’t take effect until 2018.
    http://www.healthcarelawreform.com/tags/labor-unions/

    All the money you claim can the ACA strips from Medicare to be used however is incorrect. It takes back the “free money” given to insurance companies under Medicare Advantage, not from senior benefits. This is why the insurance companies are fighting it so hard and spreading the misinformation. Of course, they don’t mention all the money they will reap as millions more people are required to have health insurance.

  • Anonymous

    Once again, I say, do a little reading. The summation explains how the system works for ALL seniors, not just those with “cadillac” plans. Also, here is a link that explains why those exemptions were granted in the first place.  It was put in place to protect union members who had negotiated good health care plans in lieu of higher wages when they had collectively bargained a previous contract. The exemptions don’t take effect until 2018.
    http://www.healthcarelawreform.com/tags/labor-unions/

    All the money you claim can the ACA strips from Medicare to be used however is incorrect. It takes back the “free money” given to insurance companies under Medicare Advantage, not from senior benefits. This is why the insurance companies are fighting it so hard and spreading the misinformation. Of course, they don’t mention all the money they will reap as millions more people are required to have health insurance.

  • Anonymous

    Once again, I say, do a little reading. The summation explains how the system works for ALL seniors, not just those with “cadillac” plans. Also, here is a link that explains why those exemptions were granted in the first place.  It was put in place to protect union members who had negotiated good health care plans in lieu of higher wages when they had collectively bargained a previous contract. The exemptions don’t take effect until 2018.
    http://www.healthcarelawreform.com/tags/labor-unions/

    All the money you claim can the ACA strips from Medicare to be used however is incorrect. It takes back the “free money” given to insurance companies under Medicare Advantage, not from senior benefits. This is why the insurance companies are fighting it so hard and spreading the misinformation. Of course, they don’t mention all the money they will reap as millions more people are required to have health insurance.

  • Anonymous

    Once again, I say, do a little reading. The summation explains how the system works for ALL seniors, not just those with “cadillac” plans. Also, here is a link that explains why those exemptions were granted in the first place.  It was put in place to protect union members who had negotiated good health care plans in lieu of higher wages when they had collectively bargained a previous contract. The exemptions don’t take effect until 2018.
    http://www.healthcarelawreform.com/tags/labor-unions/

    All the money you claim can the ACA strips from Medicare to be used however is incorrect. It takes back the “free money” given to insurance companies under Medicare Advantage, not from senior benefits. This is why the insurance companies are fighting it so hard and spreading the misinformation. Of course, they don’t mention all the money they will reap as millions more people are required to have health insurance.

  • Anonymous

    Once again, I say, do a little reading. The summation explains how the system works for ALL seniors, not just those with “cadillac” plans. Also, here is a link that explains why those exemptions were granted in the first place.  It was put in place to protect union members who had negotiated good health care plans in lieu of higher wages when they had collectively bargained a previous contract. The exemptions don’t take effect until 2018.
    http://www.healthcarelawreform.com/tags/labor-unions/

    All the money you claim can the ACA strips from Medicare to be used however is incorrect. It takes back the “free money” given to insurance companies under Medicare Advantage, not from senior benefits. This is why the insurance companies are fighting it so hard and spreading the misinformation. Of course, they don’t mention all the money they will reap as millions more people are required to have health insurance.

  • Anonymous

    And what about COMPROMISE. No side wants to COMPROMISE to get ANYTHING done.

  • Anonymous

    And what about COMPROMISE. No side wants to COMPROMISE to get ANYTHING done. 

  • Anonymous

    And what about COMPROMISE. No side wants to COMPROMISE to get ANYTHING done. 

  • Anonymous

    Might as well try that model since what we are currently doing ISN”T WORKING!

  • Anonymous

    Might as well try that model since what we are currently doing ISN”T WORKING!

  • Anonymous

    Might as well try that model since what we are currently doing ISN”T WORKING!

  • Anonymous

    Might as well try that model since what we are currently doing ISN”T WORKING!

  • Anonymous

    First of all, while the Clinton Administration believed Iraq had WMD’s, they considered Iraq to be only a threat to his neighbors and the region, not the US. Thus, the containment policy and not war.

    When Clinton had Bin Laden “in his sights” he chose not to order the cruise missles because OBL was in a family compound with up to 200 women and children, and the collateral damage would have resulted in a huge international incident. Plus, they were not absolutely certain he would still be in the compound when they attacked. OBL’s driver, later captured, confirmed OBL would have been gone by the time of the attack.

    You also omit the fact that Bush could have clearly ordered OBL’s killing at Bora Bora and passed on the chance.

  • Anonymous

    WOW ! Thanks for the history lesson NE_Voter. Excluding everyone who was born last night I think everyone knows about FDR & term limits on the executive branch.What I want to know is how is this legal.Does it not upset the balance of power between the executive and legislative branches.

    You also state that “term limits may not be a good idea” Would you care to elaborate ? The upside far out weighs any downside in my simple eye.

  • Anonymous

    You don’t seem to think that saving the country from a complete financial meltdown was constructive? Republicans have such a selective and short-term memory.

  • Anonymous

    You don’t seem to think that saving the country from a complete financial meltdown was constructive? Republicans have such a selective and short-term memory.

  • Anonymous

    You don’t seem to think that saving the country from a complete financial meltdown was constructive? Republicans have such a selective and short-term memory.

  • Anonymous

    You don’t seem to think that saving the country from a complete financial meltdown was constructive? Republicans have such a selective and short-term memory.

  • Anonymous

    You don’t seem to think that saving the country from a complete financial meltdown was constructive? Republicans have such a selective and short-term memory.

  • Anonymous

    You don’t seem to think that saving the country from a complete financial meltdown was constructive? Republicans have such a selective and short-term memory.

  • Anonymous

    Name one thing Snowe has done for you or your family?  

  • Anonymous

    Name one thing Snowe has done for you or your family?  

  • Anonymous

    Name one thing Snowe has done for you or your family?  

  • Anonymous

    Name one thing Snowe has done for you or your family?  

  • Anonymous

    Name one thing Snowe has done for you or your family?  

  • Anonymous

    Name one thing Snowe has done for you or your family?  

  • Anonymous

    Name one thing Snowe has done for you or your family?  

  • Anonymous

    Name one thing Snowe has done for you or your family?  

  • Anonymous

    Name one thing Snowe has done for you or your family?  

  • Anonymous

    Im all for compromise. As a veteran Id even support cuts to the defense budget. Big ones at that. The problem is this JD, the dems still have no plan. They have put forth NOTHING in this debt ceiling mess. Nothing on paper. No numbers, no plan. Obama has no plan. He just spews numbers one day then changes his mind the next. The dems in the senate have nothing on paper. No plan. No numbers. Now I ask you JD, who are the GOP supposed to compromise with when the other side wont even put a plan down on paper? Is the GOP supposed to compromise with themselves? When the dems actually present a plan a compromise is possible. Till then, the GOP isnt going to trust them on just word-of-mouth. Why with less than 2 weeks until the deadline is there still NO PLAN from the Dems? If that isnt irresponsible I dont know what is.

  • Anonymous

    We’re not talking about elections for state seats. The conclusion probably comes from the fact that Pingree and Michaud faced staunch Republican candidates and they both won by huge margins.

  • Anonymous

    We’re not talking about elections for state seats. The conclusion probably comes from the fact that Pingree and Michaud faced staunch Republican candidates and they both won by huge margins.

  • Anonymous

    We’re not talking about elections for state seats. The conclusion probably comes from the fact that Pingree and Michaud faced staunch Republican candidates and they both won by huge margins.

  • Anonymous

    We’re not talking about elections for state seats. The conclusion probably comes from the fact that Pingree and Michaud faced staunch Republican candidates and they both won by huge margins.

  • Anonymous

    We’re not talking about elections for state seats. The conclusion probably comes from the fact that Pingree and Michaud faced staunch Republican candidates and they both won by huge margins.

  • Anonymous

    We’re not talking about elections for state seats. The conclusion probably comes from the fact that Pingree and Michaud faced staunch Republican candidates and they both won by huge margins.

  • Anonymous

    We’re not talking about elections for state seats. The conclusion probably comes from the fact that Pingree and Michaud faced staunch Republican candidates and they both won by huge margins.

  • Anonymous

    We’re not talking about elections for state seats. The conclusion probably comes from the fact that Pingree and Michaud faced staunch Republican candidates and they both won by huge margins.

  • Anonymous

    There is a murderer in Norway who espouses some of what you are saying. Throwing words around like Marxist and others too freely.
    I would think about  it.

  • Anonymous

    There is a murderer in Norway who espouses some of what you are saying. Throwing words around like Marxist and others too freely.
    I would think about  it.

  • Anonymous

    There is a murderer in Norway who espouses some of what you are saying. Throwing words around like Marxist and others too freely.
    I would think about  it.

  • Anonymous

    There is a murderer in Norway who espouses some of what you are saying. Throwing words around like Marxist and others too freely.
    I would think about  it.

  • Anonymous

    Some of these posters are unbelievable with their myopia.

  • Anonymous

    Some of these posters are unbelievable with their myopia.

  • Anonymous

    Some of these posters are unbelievable with their myopia.

  • Anonymous

    Some of these posters are unbelievable with their myopia.

  • Anonymous

    Some of these posters are unbelievable with their myopia.

  • Anonymous

    Some of these posters are unbelievable with their myopia.

  • Anonymous

    Some of these posters are unbelievable with their myopia.

  • Anonymous

    Yeah, remember how well Levesue did in 2010…oh, wait…

  • Anonymous

    Yeah, remember how well Levesue did in 2010…oh, wait…

  • Anonymous

    Yeah, remember how well Levesue did in 2010…oh, wait…

  • Anonymous

    Yeah, remember how well Levesue did in 2010…oh, wait…

  • Anonymous

    Yeah, remember how well Levesue did in 2010…oh, wait…

  • Anonymous

    So now calling out political leaders who break the law and dont pay their taxes is a “temper tantrum”?? Interesting. I really am starting to understand why Boehner walked out on Obama. Youre just like him oh swift one. Just like talking to jello. You favor allowing politicans to break the law and not pay income taxes, just as long as they have a “D” after their names right? You really should consider a name change. SwiftyHypocrite has a nice ring to it.

  • Anonymous

    So now calling out political leaders who break the law and dont pay their taxes is a “temper tantrum”?? Interesting. I really am starting to understand why Boehner walked out on Obama. Youre just like him oh swift one. Just like talking to jello. You favor allowing politicans to break the law and not pay income taxes, just as long as they have a “D” after their names right? You really should consider a name change. SwiftyHypocrite has a nice ring to it.

  • Anonymous

    So now calling out political leaders who break the law and dont pay their taxes is a “temper tantrum”?? Interesting. I really am starting to understand why Boehner walked out on Obama. Youre just like him oh swift one. Just like talking to jello. You favor allowing politicans to break the law and not pay income taxes, just as long as they have a “D” after their names right? You really should consider a name change. SwiftyHypocrite has a nice ring to it.

  • Anonymous

    So now calling out political leaders who break the law and dont pay their taxes is a “temper tantrum”?? Interesting. I really am starting to understand why Boehner walked out on Obama. Youre just like him oh swift one. Just like talking to jello. You favor allowing politicans to break the law and not pay income taxes, just as long as they have a “D” after their names right? You really should consider a name change. SwiftyHypocrite has a nice ring to it.

  • Anonymous

    So now calling out political leaders who break the law and dont pay their taxes is a “temper tantrum”?? Interesting. I really am starting to understand why Boehner walked out on Obama. Youre just like him oh swift one. Just like talking to jello. You favor allowing politicans to break the law and not pay income taxes, just as long as they have a “D” after their names right? You really should consider a name change. SwiftyHypocrite has a nice ring to it.

  • Anonymous

    So now calling out political leaders who break the law and dont pay their taxes is a “temper tantrum”?? Interesting. I really am starting to understand why Boehner walked out on Obama. Youre just like him oh swift one. Just like talking to jello. You favor allowing politicans to break the law and not pay income taxes, just as long as they have a “D” after their names right? You really should consider a name change. SwiftyHypocrite has a nice ring to it.

  • Anonymous

    So now calling out political leaders who break the law and dont pay their taxes is a “temper tantrum”?? Interesting. I really am starting to understand why Boehner walked out on Obama. Youre just like him oh swift one. Just like talking to jello. You favor allowing politicans to break the law and not pay income taxes, just as long as they have a “D” after their names right? You really should consider a name change. SwiftyHypocrite has a nice ring to it.

  • Anonymous

    So now calling out political leaders who break the law and dont pay their taxes is a “temper tantrum”?? Interesting. I really am starting to understand why Boehner walked out on Obama. Youre just like him oh swift one. Just like talking to jello. You favor allowing politicans to break the law and not pay income taxes, just as long as they have a “D” after their names right? You really should consider a name change. SwiftyHypocrite has a nice ring to it.

  • Anonymous

    Agreed!

    And as we know trickle down economics has not been the answer, but rather part of the problem.

  • Anonymous

    Agreed!

    And as we know trickle down economics has not been the answer, but rather part of the problem.

  • Anonymous

    Agreed!

    And as we know trickle down economics has not been the answer, but rather part of the problem.

  • Anonymous

    Agreed!

    And as we know trickle down economics has not been the answer, but rather part of the problem.

  • Anonymous

    Agreed!

    And as we know trickle down economics has not been the answer, but rather part of the problem.

  • Anonymous

    Yup.  The American people are not happy with the people in Congress now.
    Yes, those Congressional “leaders” are vulnerable.

  • Anonymous

    trillions spent over  9% unemployment,After 2 years we are still facing financial catastrophe.He did some great saving.Paying his voters off is what he has done so far.

  • Anonymous

    trillions spent over  9% unemployment,After 2 years we are still facing financial catastrophe.He did some great saving.Paying his voters off is what he has done so far.

  • Anonymous

    trillions spent over  9% unemployment,After 2 years we are still facing financial catastrophe.He did some great saving.Paying his voters off is what he has done so far.

  • Anonymous

    trillions spent over  9% unemployment,After 2 years we are still facing financial catastrophe.He did some great saving.Paying his voters off is what he has done so far.

  • Anonymous

    trillions spent over  9% unemployment,After 2 years we are still facing financial catastrophe.He did some great saving.Paying his voters off is what he has done so far.

  • Anonymous

    trillions spent over  9% unemployment,After 2 years we are still facing financial catastrophe.He did some great saving.Paying his voters off is what he has done so far.

  • Anonymous

    The Patriot Act I believe was bipartisan so it wouldn’t matter what party she claimed. That is just from memory so you can check me on that. I try not to let google substitute my ability to recollect.

  • Anonymous

    The Patriot Act I believe was bipartisan so it wouldn’t matter what party she claimed. That is just from memory so you can check me on that. I try not to let google substitute my ability to recollect.

  • Anonymous

    The Patriot Act I believe was bipartisan so it wouldn’t matter what party she claimed. That is just from memory so you can check me on that. I try not to let google substitute my ability to recollect.

  • Anonymous

    The Patriot Act I believe was bipartisan so it wouldn’t matter what party she claimed. That is just from memory so you can check me on that. I try not to let google substitute my ability to recollect.

  • Anonymous

    The Patriot Act I believe was bipartisan so it wouldn’t matter what party she claimed. That is just from memory so you can check me on that. I try not to let google substitute my ability to recollect.

  • Anonymous

    The Patriot Act I believe was bipartisan so it wouldn’t matter what party she claimed. That is just from memory so you can check me on that. I try not to let google substitute my ability to recollect.

  • Anonymous

    ……..yet you had no problem with MaryBelle labeling conservatives as fascists – funny how the name calling is ok if it is one way against the conservatives.  The murderer in Norway has nothing in common with my conservative beliefs, nothing at all.

  • Anonymous

    ……..yet you had no problem with MaryBelle labeling conservatives as fascists – funny how the name calling is ok if it is one way against the conservatives.  The murderer in Norway has nothing in common with my conservative beliefs, nothing at all.

  • Anonymous

    The type of health insurance plan you describe, high deductible with an HSA, has been available for years.  You could have done the same thing years ago.  15 years ago I had such a policy.  Before Maine messed the whole thing up,destroyed competition, and drove the cost of such policies for individuals through the roof.

    My understanding of Obamacare is that those high deductible policies will effectively be outlawed once Obomacare is fully implemented. 

  • Anonymous

    The type of health insurance plan you describe, high deductible with an HSA, has been available for years.  You could have done the same thing years ago.  15 years ago I had such a policy.  Before Maine messed the whole thing up,destroyed competition, and drove the cost of such policies for individuals through the roof.

    My understanding of Obamacare is that those high deductible policies will effectively be outlawed once Obomacare is fully implemented. 

  • Anonymous

    Term limits and an outright ban on EVER being a paid lobbyist.

  • Anonymous

    Term limits and an outright ban on EVER being a paid lobbyist.

  • Anonymous

    Surprisingly, to the few die hard Obama fans, he usually ends up on the side of corporations and not people. So, both parties are working for the same goal. With a scapegoat thrown in to up the hate. And so WE won’t realize that both parties are so compromised, they can no longer govern.

  • Anonymous

    Surprisingly, to the few die hard Obama fans, he usually ends up on the side of corporations and not people. So, both parties are working for the same goal. With a scapegoat thrown in to up the hate. And so WE won’t realize that both parties are so compromised, they can no longer govern.

  • Anonymous

    I do not need someone like you to point out what I should say, or not say , to another poster.
    Just last evening I asked that poster “where did she come up with some of this stuff?”
    I have, at least several times, told her I thought it was very inadvisable and wrong to throw the word “Hitler” around so often, (and other posters have said the same thing to her.)
    I never, ever, use the word “fascist”.  I think it is used too often. Once again, that was pointed out as well, but no heed.

    I have read a lot of troubling posts on this blog about immigrants, telling people only certain people should live in Maine and on and on  If I see any similarities, that is my right to see it as I see it.  I can read. (and will come to my own conclusions, without you.)

  • Anonymous

    The so called lefties do not love Obama. Turn off Fox News. 

    Class warfare is a two party problem. The right wing  on the Supreme Court never seem to have a problem with corporations, but always side against the people . Notice that neither dem or repubs are talking about decreasing the bloated military budget?

  • Anonymous

    Guess entitlement is hard working people who have paid into social security all their lives should just forget about it? Or the trillions given to the banking industry for their bad gambling debts?

  • Anonymous

    You are right. Only one senator voted against it. Russ Feingold.

    My memory doesn’t always serve me. Younger folks do better . Google also has to be weighed and compared. You can get just about anything by googling. But something like the Patriot Act is pretty cut and dry. Not as much room for fudging facts.

  • Anonymous

    Overtaking O in popularity. Ron Paul is anti war.

  • Anonymous

    Read Richard Clark’s book that came out after 9/11. He was the so called terrorism czar under dems and repub presidents. He said in his book that Clinton wanted Bin Laden asassinated and the army refused. Then Army said that they wanted to kill him and Clinton stopped them. Mainstream media leaves a lot to be desired for truth.

  • Anonymous

    Well, you cant have it both ways. Either TARP saved the economy or it didnt. When you factor in that it was passed under Bush, suddenly TARP didnt save the economy anymore to the left. Then it becomes the $787 billion for those shovel-ready jobs that didnt exist that saved the economy. Funny how that works isnt it?  I love how you people try to claim that Bush forced Obama and Harry and Nancy to spend more than he ever did in order to “save” our economy, and yet unemployment went up after it, and is STILL at that higher rate. Its actually been around 16% if you use the true U6 number of total unemployed for the past two years. So tell us again how “spending our way out of debt” works.

  • Anonymous

    Good post, as usual.

  • Anonymous

    The president talks compromise but I have seen absolutely ZERO details from him about what he proposes.  What trial balloons the administration has put out all amount to tax increases with promises to cut spending sometime in the future.  As you know, this has happened in the past and while the tax increases passed the spending reductions never did.

    I think it is all posturing and that he is  simply trying to position himself for reelection.  If he never actually proposes anything concrete himself them he can blame everything on congress, distance himself from decisions that people do not like, and pretend to be above it all.

    And I have no problem with some tax increases.  Interest and dividend income should be taxed ONCE, at the individual level and as regular income.  Close tax loopholes, end corporate subsidies, end many deductions.  Including the mortgage interest deduction that actually benefits higher income people more than the middle class.  I could make a LONG list….

  • Anonymous

    It is hard sometimes to pay attn. to people with different views. But if we don’t we become narrow and boring.

  • Anonymous

    It is hard sometimes to pay attn. to people with different views. But if we don’t we become narrow and boring.

  • Anonymous

    It is hard sometimes to pay attn. to people with different views. But if we don’t we become narrow and boring.

  • Anonymous

    It is hard sometimes to pay attn. to people with different views. But if we don’t we become narrow and boring.

  • Anonymous

    It is hard sometimes to pay attn. to people with different views. But if we don’t we become narrow and boring.

  • Anonymous

    It is hard sometimes to pay attn. to people with different views. But if we don’t we become narrow and boring.

  • Anonymous

    It is hard sometimes to pay attn. to people with different views. But if we don’t we become narrow and boring.

  • Anonymous

    It is hard sometimes to pay attn. to people with different views. But if we don’t we become narrow and boring.

  • Anonymous

    It is hard sometimes to pay attn. to people with different views. But if we don’t we become narrow and boring.

  • Anonymous

    It is hard sometimes to pay attn. to people with different views. But if we don’t we become narrow and boring.

  • Anonymous

    It is hard sometimes to pay attn. to people with different views. But if we don’t we become narrow and boring.

  • Anonymous

    It is hard sometimes to pay attn. to people with different views. But if we don’t we become narrow and boring.

  • Anonymous

    It is hard sometimes to pay attn. to people with different views. But if we don’t we become narrow and boring.

  • Anonymous

    But that really doesn’t address your “There are still unanswered questions about 9/11″ comment does it?

  • Anonymous

    Boy Fox news is really a thorn in your side isnt it? I hate to break it to you, but I dont watch Fox news. Dont have cable. Now you will just have to remain confused and bewildered as to how Im not an Obama clone like you, yet I dont watch Fox. I guess the Fox boogie-man the left fears so much must scare them for a reason. Probably because they actually tell the truth? God forbid..err..Im sorry..Obama messiah forbid that from happening.

  • Anonymous

    I didn’t “omit” anything. It wasn’t part of the MaryBelle’s original post and my question to her.

    And it seems you are at odds with MaryBelle’s last post where she claims “Clinton wanted Bin Laden asassinated and the army refused” and your stated position that Clinton had Bin Laden “in his sights” he chose not to order the cruise
    missles because OBL was in a family compound with up to 200 women and
    children, and the collateral damage would have resulted in a huge
    international incident.”

    I wonder which one position is correct?

  • Anonymous

     And the Republicans aren’t posturing? As as registered Republican I find what the Republican’s are doing as Russian Roulette.  I find what the Democrats doing is something akin to Eddie Munster stomping his feet and repeating “I wont! I wont! I wont!!”

    Both sides need to work to a compromise for the GOOD of the COUNTRY.

  • Anonymous

    You think the President is “posturing” for re-election? Well, if they (Congress and the President) don’t solve this he wont have much to worry about other than his Presidential Library and memoirs.

    Caterpillar’s CEO was just quoted that this is “bad for business” and “customers are talking about this”. I wonder why they are “talking about” the debt ceiling and not ordering Caterpillar’s products? Could it be the huge unknown of what happens if the United States of America does not reach a deal and actually defaults on its debts?

  • Anonymous

    You think the President is “posturing” for re-election? Well, if they (Congress and the President) don’t solve this he wont have much to worry about other than his Presidential Library and memoirs.

    Caterpillar’s CEO was just quoted that this is “bad for business” and “customers are talking about this”. I wonder why they are “talking about” the debt ceiling and not ordering Caterpillar’s products? Could it be the huge unknown of what happens if the United States of America does not reach a deal and actually defaults on its debts?

  • Anonymous

    She has been in the Senate now for three Terms, I don’t think anyone should serve more than that.

  • Anonymous

    She has been in the Senate now for three Terms, I don’t think anyone should serve more than that.

  • ChuckGG

    I am not sure that is the case.  The HSA is relatively new with its roll-over vs. the older medical accounts where the funds disappeared at the end of the year.  I looked into these years ago but each procedure had limits on it.  A heart attack would be covered for $50,000 for example.  The only way I could get full-coverage was with the “Cadillac” policy which I had for many years.  Due to my health being good, I really only am concerned with catastrophic issues (heart, stroke, etc.).  The routine stuff can be paid out of pocket.

    I have seen nothing and heard of no specifics about this high-deductible with HSA being adversely affected by Obamacare.  If you have some specifics, I’d like to hear them.  Thanks for the information.

  • ChuckGG

    I am not sure that is the case.  The HSA is relatively new with its roll-over vs. the older medical accounts where the funds disappeared at the end of the year.  I looked into these years ago but each procedure had limits on it.  A heart attack would be covered for $50,000 for example.  The only way I could get full-coverage was with the “Cadillac” policy which I had for many years.  Due to my health being good, I really only am concerned with catastrophic issues (heart, stroke, etc.).  The routine stuff can be paid out of pocket.

    I have seen nothing and heard of no specifics about this high-deductible with HSA being adversely affected by Obamacare.  If you have some specifics, I’d like to hear them.  Thanks for the information.

  • Anonymous

    Not a majority of Dems love Olympia.  A majority of repugnants love her though.

  • Anonymous

    Not a majority of Dems love Olympia.  A majority of repugnants love her though.

  • Anonymous

    Not a majority of Dems love Olympia.  A majority of repugnants love her though.

  • Anonymous

    Not a majority of Dems love Olympia.  A majority of repugnants love her though.

  • Anonymous

    Not a majority of Dems love Olympia.  A majority of repugnants love her though.

  • Anonymous

    There will always be wealthy under Democrats, but under Repugnants their will be just Super Wealthy. And Poor, no middle class

  • Anonymous

    how about the 40 plus percent that pays no taxes get a little skin in the game.

  • Anonymous

    First of all, I don’t consider millionaires to be middle class. Plus Obama did not start Social Security and Medicare. And there was a time, before this country swung to the extreme right, when even Republicand liked entitlements. People kind of liked the idea of being able to grow old without the fear of being thrown in the streets to die because they were broke and without health care.

  • Anonymous

    First of all, I don’t consider millionaires to be middle class. Plus Obama did not start Social Security and Medicare. And there was a time, before this country swung to the extreme right, when even Republicand liked entitlements. People kind of liked the idea of being able to grow old without the fear of being thrown in the streets to die because they were broke and without health care.

  • Anonymous

    First of all, I don’t consider millionaires to be middle class. Plus Obama did not start Social Security and Medicare. And there was a time, before this country swung to the extreme right, when even Republicand liked entitlements. People kind of liked the idea of being able to grow old without the fear of being thrown in the streets to die because they were broke and without health care.

  • Anonymous

    First of all, I don’t consider millionaires to be middle class. Plus Obama did not start Social Security and Medicare. And there was a time, before this country swung to the extreme right, when even Republicand liked entitlements. People kind of liked the idea of being able to grow old without the fear of being thrown in the streets to die because they were broke and without health care.

  • Anonymous

    There will always be poor under democrats to keep their voting block.Two years of compolete control by the dems and all they could come up with is paying off the unions for votes.

  • Anonymous

    There will always be poor under democrats to keep their voting block.Two years of compolete control by the dems and all they could come up with is paying off the unions for votes.

  • Anonymous

    There will always be poor under democrats to keep their voting block.Two years of compolete control by the dems and all they could come up with is paying off the unions for votes.

  • Anonymous

    It’s time to replace every single member of congress with members who are not out to make themselves rich or career elected officials, living off the taxpayers of this country.  The longer these elected spenders stay in office, the more it costs the taxpayers of this country.  Both parties are to blame for the mess we are in.  They have had plenty of time to avert the crisis our nation faces today.  Instead, everyone of them has been playing political games, blaming each other instead of doing what is right & needed for the nation.
    We need people who will serve one term & move on, as our founding fathers invisioned.   It’s time to do away with their pensions, perks & elite healthcare programs, then perhaps they’ll do what they are supposed to be doing, namely working for the good of the citizens instead of themselves & their special interests.

  • Anonymous

    voting with the dems 90% of the time has nothing to do with reason

  • Anonymous

    profits are retained through running a tight  ship. the government sure  could use some of that.

  • Anonymous

    Are you on bath salts? The GOP are the only ones to put forth ANY legislation on this debt ceiling so far, while the Dems have been sitting on their hands and poo-poo’ing anything the House passes. Where is the DNC plan for the debt ceiling? Doesnt exist. The party of “no” you say? I think you mean the party with no plan. And that is the DNC.

  • Anonymous

    seems to me that the economy was in decent shape during clinton….and then the neocons came in and “fixed” everything….why don’t you explain to us again how the bush tax cuts created more revenue, and that resulting trickle down created more jobs…..job losses at the end of bush were 800,000/month…it’s pretty evident that the right wing “solution” to the economy and jobs has been nothing short of complete and total failure….

  • Anonymous

    seems to me that the economy was in decent shape during clinton….and then the neocons came in and “fixed” everything….why don’t you explain to us again how the bush tax cuts created more revenue, and that resulting trickle down created more jobs…..job losses at the end of bush were 800,000/month…it’s pretty evident that the right wing “solution” to the economy and jobs has been nothing short of complete and total failure….

  • Anonymous

    seems to me that the economy was in decent shape during clinton….and then the neocons came in and “fixed” everything….why don’t you explain to us again how the bush tax cuts created more revenue, and that resulting trickle down created more jobs…..job losses at the end of bush were 800,000/month…it’s pretty evident that the right wing “solution” to the economy and jobs has been nothing short of complete and total failure….

  • Anonymous

    seems to me that the economy was in decent shape during clinton….and then the neocons came in and “fixed” everything….why don’t you explain to us again how the bush tax cuts created more revenue, and that resulting trickle down created more jobs…..job losses at the end of bush were 800,000/month…it’s pretty evident that the right wing “solution” to the economy and jobs has been nothing short of complete and total failure….

  • Anonymous

    seems to me that the economy was in decent shape during clinton….and then the neocons came in and “fixed” everything….why don’t you explain to us again how the bush tax cuts created more revenue, and that resulting trickle down created more jobs…..job losses at the end of bush were 800,000/month…it’s pretty evident that the right wing “solution” to the economy and jobs has been nothing short of complete and total failure….

  • Anonymous

    seems to me that the economy was in decent shape during clinton….and then the neocons came in and “fixed” everything….why don’t you explain to us again how the bush tax cuts created more revenue, and that resulting trickle down created more jobs…..job losses at the end of bush were 800,000/month…it’s pretty evident that the right wing “solution” to the economy and jobs has been nothing short of complete and total failure….

  • Anonymous

    I do believe they both are great programs no one is saying to end them.I would like to see evryone get some skin in the tax game.Not just the job producers paying for all.

  • Anonymous

    Don’t hold your breath waiting for that to happen JD. None of them are interested in the Country. The only way we will solve the problems facing our Nation and State is to do away with career politicians. One term, thank you for your service , good bye.

  • Anonymous

    That is completely false. First of all, it was Tora Bora. Secondly, Bush had nothing to do with not getting OBL. The ODA (green berets) on the scene called in an airstrike on OBL and his party. The aircraft that was assigned to the strike had a mech problem and before the sortie could be assigned to another aircraft the ODA lost sight of OBL. I know this for a fact because I know one of the USAF combat controllers who was there. Blaming Bush for that mech problem is just as wrong-headed as crediting Obama for getting OBL. I didnt see Barry carrying an HK416 getting on the bird for the raid. He wasnt there. DEVGRU got OBL. Obama just tried to take full credit for it.

  • Anonymous

    not happy with a president that let this get to where it is.Absolutely no leadership.

  • Anonymous

    Oh I forgot to add. Had Bush killed OBL, it would have just “created more terrorists”. So in leftoworld, Bush really did a great job. He left OBL alive because killing him would have been mean. Isnt that how you look at it? Its all about feelings right?

  • Anonymous

    bush jr, palin, bachmann and lepage are mensa?

  • Anonymous

     keeping a voting block poor like the liberals have done for years is compassion!Do not teach them to fish lets just feed them a sardine once and awhile to keep them coming back.the liberal path to victory. glad to see maine people starting to see just what liberal policy’s did to this state.

  • Anonymous

    Poll after poll after poll done by polling companies from both sides of the political spectrum tell us one thing. Americans have a slightly higher opinion of congress then they do of serial killers. But when it comes time to go into the voting booth Americans time after time after time after time return the same people to congress. If doing the same thing over and over again expecting a different result is the definition of crazy then we as a people are certifiable.

  • Anonymous

    Poll after poll after poll done by polling companies from both sides of the political spectrum tell us one thing. Americans have a slightly higher opinion of congress then they do of serial killers. But when it comes time to go into the voting booth Americans time after time after time after time return the same people to congress. If doing the same thing over and over again expecting a different result is the definition of crazy then we as a people are certifiable.

  • Anonymous

    Poll after poll after poll done by polling companies from both sides of the political spectrum tell us one thing. Americans have a slightly higher opinion of congress then they do of serial killers. But when it comes time to go into the voting booth Americans time after time after time after time return the same people to congress. If doing the same thing over and over again expecting a different result is the definition of crazy then we as a people are certifiable.

  • Anonymous

    Poll after poll after poll done by polling companies from both sides of the political spectrum tell us one thing. Americans have a slightly higher opinion of congress then they do of serial killers. But when it comes time to go into the voting booth Americans time after time after time after time return the same people to congress. If doing the same thing over and over again expecting a different result is the definition of crazy then we as a people are certifiable.

  • Anonymous

    Poll after poll after poll done by polling companies from both sides of the political spectrum tell us one thing. Americans have a slightly higher opinion of congress then they do of serial killers. But when it comes time to go into the voting booth Americans time after time after time after time return the same people to congress. If doing the same thing over and over again expecting a different result is the definition of crazy then we as a people are certifiable.

  • Anonymous

    Poll after poll after poll done by polling companies from both sides of the political spectrum tell us one thing. Americans have a slightly higher opinion of congress then they do of serial killers. But when it comes time to go into the voting booth Americans time after time after time after time return the same people to congress. If doing the same thing over and over again expecting a different result is the definition of crazy then we as a people are certifiable.

  • Anonymous

    15 years ago I had the high deductible policy.   I had a 2 million lifetime cap and I do not remember any limitations on individual procedures.  HSAs were not available then so I simply put my savings over the cost of a conventional full coverage health insurance plan into the bank until I had built up about $8000 for routine procedures and deductibles.   Paid cash for a colostomy, dental, etc.

    Whole foods has a similar company provided program.
    online.wsj.com/article/SB10001424052970204251404574342170072865070
    Tried to find more links, several didn’t seem to work.  There is more out there on this.

    HSAs began officially in 2003.  You have HSAs confused with FSAs that do not roll over.

    Obamacare effectively outlaws high deductible health insurance by placing  low limits on both deductibles and total out of pocket expenses.  And preventive care must be covered 100% by the health plan.   This severely limits the usefulness of an HSA.  Also they have changed the rules on what HSAs can be used for.

  • Anonymous

    Thank you for being civil. So many people on this board get so nasty about things when they disagree with you. I appreciate your candor and its nice to see someone being descent for a change on the opposition. My memory isn’t always correct either that is why I said you can check me on that. Thanks again.

  • Anonymous

    August 5, 2009~ “Its a bad idea to raise taxes during a recession” Barack Hussein Obama.
    So when he was talking out that side of his face(s) was he lying then? Or is he lying now??

  • Anonymous

    Please Snowe no more snow jobs from you. You have done nothing for Maine except collect a huge salary from the taxpayers for many many years.  Where are all the JOBS you have promised ?????????????? Time for new blood. Maybe an Independent or a Democrat for a change.

  • ChuckGG

    Thanks for the info.  I will run all this past my insurance provider (Kaiser-Permanente HMO) for comment.  Right now, the plan I have is ideal.  I shied away from the FSA approach as the money disappeared and as I rarely spend any money at the doctor’s annually, I thought it was a waste of money.  With the HSA, I have a chance to recover those funds.  Appreciate the input!

    I think this pushes my point that we all need to do our homework.  Nothing is simple any longer.

  • Anonymous

    V.P. George H.W. Bush during his nomination speech at the 1988 Republican National Convention – “Read my lips, No New Taxes!” It brought the house down and I know because I was watching it. And we know what happened during his administration.

  • Anonymous

    The purpose of government is to protect and serve the people. That is not the purpose of business nor do they willingly demonstrate that ideal in their decision making.

    I don’t think you would really find many people who do not wish the government would run a tighter ship. Wasteful spending does not serve the people, but deciding what is considered wasteful spending is the real issue, isn’t it?

  • Anonymous

    How about serious and worthwhile legislation? All they offer is taking more from the majority and giving it to the rich minority. Every time the Dems agree to a GOP proposal, they pull it off the table and demand more. They don’t want a solution…they just want to beat Obama at any cost, even at the risk of another financial disaster.

  • Anonymous

    How about serious and worthwhile legislation? All they offer is taking more from the majority and giving it to the rich minority. Every time the Dems agree to a GOP proposal, they pull it off the table and demand more. They don’t want a solution…they just want to beat Obama at any cost, even at the risk of another financial disaster.

  • Anonymous

    How about serious and worthwhile legislation? All they offer is taking more from the majority and giving it to the rich minority. Every time the Dems agree to a GOP proposal, they pull it off the table and demand more. They don’t want a solution…they just want to beat Obama at any cost, even at the risk of another financial disaster.

  • Anonymous

    How about serious and worthwhile legislation? All they offer is taking more from the majority and giving it to the rich minority. Every time the Dems agree to a GOP proposal, they pull it off the table and demand more. They don’t want a solution…they just want to beat Obama at any cost, even at the risk of another financial disaster.

  • Anonymous

    How about serious and worthwhile legislation? All they offer is taking more from the majority and giving it to the rich minority. Every time the Dems agree to a GOP proposal, they pull it off the table and demand more. They don’t want a solution…they just want to beat Obama at any cost, even at the risk of another financial disaster.

  • Anonymous

    How about serious and worthwhile legislation? All they offer is taking more from the majority and giving it to the rich minority. Every time the Dems agree to a GOP proposal, they pull it off the table and demand more. They don’t want a solution…they just want to beat Obama at any cost, even at the risk of another financial disaster.

  • Anonymous

    How about serious and worthwhile legislation? All they offer is taking more from the majority and giving it to the rich minority. Every time the Dems agree to a GOP proposal, they pull it off the table and demand more. They don’t want a solution…they just want to beat Obama at any cost, even at the risk of another financial disaster.

  • Anonymous

    What at first was plunder assumed the softer name of revenue.  ~Thomas Paine
    I think this is just a relevant to the topic at hand as your 20 year old example from Bush 41.

  • Anonymous

    What at first was plunder assumed the softer name of revenue.  ~Thomas Paine
    I think this is just a relevant to the topic at hand as your 20 year old example from Bush 41.

  • Anonymous

    What at first was plunder assumed the softer name of revenue.  ~Thomas Paine
    I think this is just a relevant to the topic at hand as your 20 year old example from Bush 41.

  • Anonymous

    What at first was plunder assumed the softer name of revenue.  ~Thomas Paine
    I think this is just a relevant to the topic at hand as your 20 year old example from Bush 41.

  • Anonymous

    What at first was plunder assumed the softer name of revenue.  ~Thomas Paine
    I think this is just a relevant to the topic at hand as your 20 year old example from Bush 41.

  • Anonymous

    I just wonder. Doesnt your burning hatred of the “rich” border on racism and being a “hater”? I love how you envy the rich for their money, but you never want to do the hard work it takes to get rich. I say the rich EARN what they have, while all you can do is covet their money and be jealous of their success. Thats pretty sad. Instead of solving our problems by destroying the successful in this country, maybe you need to find another way. One that doesnt involve envy or greed or stealing from the successful to pander to the layabouts.

  • Anonymous

    I just wonder. Doesnt your burning hatred of the “rich” border on racism and being a “hater”? I love how you envy the rich for their money, but you never want to do the hard work it takes to get rich. I say the rich EARN what they have, while all you can do is covet their money and be jealous of their success. Thats pretty sad. Instead of solving our problems by destroying the successful in this country, maybe you need to find another way. One that doesnt involve envy or greed or stealing from the successful to pander to the layabouts.

  • Anonymous

    I just wonder. Doesnt your burning hatred of the “rich” border on racism and being a “hater”? I love how you envy the rich for their money, but you never want to do the hard work it takes to get rich. I say the rich EARN what they have, while all you can do is covet their money and be jealous of their success. Thats pretty sad. Instead of solving our problems by destroying the successful in this country, maybe you need to find another way. One that doesnt involve envy or greed or stealing from the successful to pander to the layabouts.

  • Anonymous

    I just wonder. Doesnt your burning hatred of the “rich” border on racism and being a “hater”? I love how you envy the rich for their money, but you never want to do the hard work it takes to get rich. I say the rich EARN what they have, while all you can do is covet their money and be jealous of their success. Thats pretty sad. Instead of solving our problems by destroying the successful in this country, maybe you need to find another way. One that doesnt involve envy or greed or stealing from the successful to pander to the layabouts.

  • Anonymous

    Don’t be rude.  You asked a question and I answered it.

    Sorry to offend, but you don’t understand.  It’s legal because Congress passed an amendment making it legal and the required majority of states ratified it.  That’s all it takes.  It’s legal.

    Term limits are a bad idea.  There is some value to knowledge and experience.  Also, if we have a fully engaged and voting public we would surely more turnover.  As it is nearly 1/2 of people who could vote don’t.  The 1/2 who do usually follow party lines and as a result we end up many members of Congress who never leave.  It’s not their fault, it is the responsibility of voters to actually vote.

  • Anonymous

    Don’t be rude.  You asked a question and I answered it.

    Sorry to offend, but you don’t understand.  It’s legal because Congress passed an amendment making it legal and the required majority of states ratified it.  That’s all it takes.  It’s legal.

    Term limits are a bad idea.  There is some value to knowledge and experience.  Also, if we have a fully engaged and voting public we would surely more turnover.  As it is nearly 1/2 of people who could vote don’t.  The 1/2 who do usually follow party lines and as a result we end up many members of Congress who never leave.  It’s not their fault, it is the responsibility of voters to actually vote.

  • Anonymous

    Don’t be rude.  You asked a question and I answered it.

    Sorry to offend, but you don’t understand.  It’s legal because Congress passed an amendment making it legal and the required majority of states ratified it.  That’s all it takes.  It’s legal.

    Term limits are a bad idea.  There is some value to knowledge and experience.  Also, if we have a fully engaged and voting public we would surely more turnover.  As it is nearly 1/2 of people who could vote don’t.  The 1/2 who do usually follow party lines and as a result we end up many members of Congress who never leave.  It’s not their fault, it is the responsibility of voters to actually vote.

  • Anonymous

    Don’t be rude.  You asked a question and I answered it.

    Sorry to offend, but you don’t understand.  It’s legal because Congress passed an amendment making it legal and the required majority of states ratified it.  That’s all it takes.  It’s legal.

    Term limits are a bad idea.  There is some value to knowledge and experience.  Also, if we have a fully engaged and voting public we would surely more turnover.  As it is nearly 1/2 of people who could vote don’t.  The 1/2 who do usually follow party lines and as a result we end up many members of Congress who never leave.  It’s not their fault, it is the responsibility of voters to actually vote.

  • Anonymous

    Don’t be rude.  You asked a question and I answered it.

    Sorry to offend, but you don’t understand.  It’s legal because Congress passed an amendment making it legal and the required majority of states ratified it.  That’s all it takes.  It’s legal.

    Term limits are a bad idea.  There is some value to knowledge and experience.  Also, if we have a fully engaged and voting public we would surely more turnover.  As it is nearly 1/2 of people who could vote don’t.  The 1/2 who do usually follow party lines and as a result we end up many members of Congress who never leave.  It’s not their fault, it is the responsibility of voters to actually vote.

  • Anonymous

     JD, I agree that no one appears willing to compromise.   The problem I have with the democrats and the group of 6and all the other little groups is that most of the spending cuts are nothing more than promises to do something in the future.  Or even worse, another commission who will make recommendations that will be immediately ignored.  NOTE:  Obama’s own debt commission last fall.

    I don’t believe we can trust any of them.  I am all for letting the Democrats have some of their tax increases as I mentioned in another post.  As well as cutting defense spending significantly.    But not one penny until they agree with real spending cuts.  Spending cuts that start NOW, not promised years down the road.

  • Anonymous

     JD, I agree that no one appears willing to compromise.   The problem I have with the democrats and the group of 6and all the other little groups is that most of the spending cuts are nothing more than promises to do something in the future.  Or even worse, another commission who will make recommendations that will be immediately ignored.  NOTE:  Obama’s own debt commission last fall.

    I don’t believe we can trust any of them.  I am all for letting the Democrats have some of their tax increases as I mentioned in another post.  As well as cutting defense spending significantly.    But not one penny until they agree with real spending cuts.  Spending cuts that start NOW, not promised years down the road.

  • Anonymous

    Don’t be rude.  You asked a question and I answered it.

    Sorry to offend, but you don’t understand.  It’s legal because Congress passed an amendment making it legal and the required majority of states ratified it.  That’s all it takes.  It’s legal.

    Term limits are a bad idea.  There is some value to knowledge and experience.  Also, if we have a fully engaged and voting public we would surely more turnover.  As it is nearly 1/2 of people who could vote don’t.  The 1/2 who do usually follow party lines and as a result we end up many members of Congress who never leave.  It’s not their fault, it is the responsibility of voters to actually vote.

  • Anonymous

     JD, I agree that no one appears willing to compromise.   The problem I have with the democrats and the group of 6and all the other little groups is that most of the spending cuts are nothing more than promises to do something in the future.  Or even worse, another commission who will make recommendations that will be immediately ignored.  NOTE:  Obama’s own debt commission last fall.

    I don’t believe we can trust any of them.  I am all for letting the Democrats have some of their tax increases as I mentioned in another post.  As well as cutting defense spending significantly.    But not one penny until they agree with real spending cuts.  Spending cuts that start NOW, not promised years down the road.

  • Anonymous

     JD, I agree that no one appears willing to compromise.   The problem I have with the democrats and the group of 6and all the other little groups is that most of the spending cuts are nothing more than promises to do something in the future.  Or even worse, another commission who will make recommendations that will be immediately ignored.  NOTE:  Obama’s own debt commission last fall.

    I don’t believe we can trust any of them.  I am all for letting the Democrats have some of their tax increases as I mentioned in another post.  As well as cutting defense spending significantly.    But not one penny until they agree with real spending cuts.  Spending cuts that start NOW, not promised years down the road.

  • Anonymous

     JD, I agree that no one appears willing to compromise.   The problem I have with the democrats and the group of 6and all the other little groups is that most of the spending cuts are nothing more than promises to do something in the future.  Or even worse, another commission who will make recommendations that will be immediately ignored.  NOTE:  Obama’s own debt commission last fall.

    I don’t believe we can trust any of them.  I am all for letting the Democrats have some of their tax increases as I mentioned in another post.  As well as cutting defense spending significantly.    But not one penny until they agree with real spending cuts.  Spending cuts that start NOW, not promised years down the road.

  • Anonymous

    Kinda sucks when you get beat to the punch playing the race card doesnt it Rev. Sharpton??

  • Anonymous

    Well, g bush made the statement while gov. of Texas , he wanted to invade Iraq. Things have a way of working out  for big oil.

  • Anonymous

    Better to kill over a million Iraqis and several million more displaced than create more terrorists. 

  • Anonymous

    Just quoting Richard Clark. He was appalled at the lack of interest in terrorism in the bush administration.

  • Anonymous

    To be honest Adam I wonder if they arent all idiots sometimes. Obama thought we have 57 states. I guess the whole point is, when you have the press following you around 24/7, sooner or later they are going to catch you saying something stupid. We all do it. The problem now is that a simple mistaken comment becomes fodder for the other side to prove that the other side are “idiots”. While it a whole new subject, the effect the media has on the political climate in this country isnt favorable. But we’ll save that one for another day.

  • Anonymous

    The democrats I know for the most part dislike President Obama. They don’t like his politics or his once a day TV broadcasts. I don’t like Sen. Olympia Snowe and they don’t like the current President. You can dislike someone in your own political party. This is a free country.    

  • SwiftyMorgain

    So what is the other 10%

    It appears then that the Democrats must be on the right track 90% of the time

  • SwiftyMorgain

    So what is the other 10%

    It appears then that the Democrats must be on the right track 90% of the time

  • SwiftyMorgain

        There is no “one” party that holds all the slippery deals. We even have a Conservative Supreme court Justice that happened to forget to disclose his wifes reciepts of  money to form a Tea Party group. ( For thirteen Years!)

    So prosecute!

    Dont hold the PEOPLE hostage because of these slippery dealers!

  • Anonymous

    You mean like saying that the “rich” dont create jobs? According to Obama and his class warfare minons, my boss is a “billionaire” and he hired me. So thats one job a “rich” person created.  btw..hes not at all “rich” but a Mao-wannabe like Obama sure would call him that. Especially since my boss is also white.

  • Anonymous

    OK..on that we agree. Rangel should be in jail, or at minimum out of a leadership position. Geithner samey same. I cant think of the last GOP member to get caught being a tax cheat, but regardless if a GOP member breaks the law, send him to jail too. The one problem I have with your statement about Clarence Thomas’ wife getting $ from the Tea party for 13 years is the fact that the TP has only been around for 3 years. That right there is some DNC fuzzy math if Ive ever seen it. But if you or anyone can prove Thomas broke a law, I say prosecute him.

  • Anonymous

    OK..on that we agree. Rangel should be in jail, or at minimum out of a leadership position. Geithner samey same. I cant think of the last GOP member to get caught being a tax cheat, but regardless if a GOP member breaks the law, send him to jail too. The one problem I have with your statement about Clarence Thomas’ wife getting $ from the Tea party for 13 years is the fact that the TP has only been around for 3 years. That right there is some DNC fuzzy math if Ive ever seen it. But if you or anyone can prove Thomas broke a law, I say prosecute him.

  • Anonymous

    SNOWE AS A REGISTERED REPUBLICAN (NEWLY) FROM AN INDEPENDENT.. U WILL NOT GET MY VOTE ! 

  • http://pulse.yahoo.com/_EYVOS3FETQE42K4DMZXUHZJU2U maine man

    Have any of you
    seen what’s happened to the dollar today? It’s about to slip below 74 cents.
    Between the Commodity/Forex trader’s manipulations and the stupidity of the
    Republican/teabillies, we’re going to pay more for everything. We, taxpayers
    bailed out the banks so that they could hoard and manipulate commodities and
    finance the campaigns of teabillies and republicans who joyfully default on
    this countries debt and sink us into a depression. You just gotta wonder about
    the monumental stupidity and greed of Wall St to support idiots who shoot
    themselves in the foot, shoot their Wall St masters in the heart and shoot the
    whole country in the nuts.

  • http://pulse.yahoo.com/_EYVOS3FETQE42K4DMZXUHZJU2U maine man

    Have any of you
    seen what’s happened to the dollar today? It’s about to slip below 74 cents.
    Between the Commodity/Forex trader’s manipulations and the stupidity of the
    Republican/teabillies, we’re going to pay more for everything. We, taxpayers
    bailed out the banks so that they could hoard and manipulate commodities and
    finance the campaigns of teabillies and republicans who joyfully default on
    this countries debt and sink us into a depression. You just gotta wonder about
    the monumental stupidity and greed of Wall St to support idiots who shoot
    themselves in the foot, shoot their Wall St masters in the heart and shoot the
    whole country in the nuts.

  • SwiftyMorgain

    George Bush got it raise seven times without any concessions or plan!

    So whats the Problem Now? The fact that there is a Democrat in Office?

    Great Plan!Take the US economy down to discredit the encumbant!

    http://www.cbsnews.com/8301-500803_162-4486228-500803.htm

    Its  time to pay for Bush’s Screw up!

    Its Time to Pay the Piper!

  • SwiftyMorgain

    George Bush got it raise seven times without any concessions or plan!

    So whats the Problem Now? The fact that there is a Democrat in Office?

    Great Plan!Take the US economy down to discredit the encumbant!

    http://www.cbsnews.com/8301-500803_162-4486228-500803.htm

    Its  time to pay for Bush’s Screw up!

    Its Time to Pay the Piper!

  • http://www.facebook.com/people/Claude-Malone/1282306206 Claude Malone

    you people will be sorry if she goes back to Washington. need new people to go from Maine. She has done engough to state of maine

  • http://www.facebook.com/people/Claude-Malone/1282306206 Claude Malone

    you people will be sorry if she goes back to Washington. need new people to go from Maine. She has done engough to state of maine

  • SwiftyMorgain

    One more Time!

    The Goal of the Government is not to run a profit!

    It is to provide for the general welfare of the country.

  • SwiftyMorgain

    One more Time!

    The Goal of the Government is not to run a profit!

    It is to provide for the general welfare of the country.

  • Anonymous

    And if we do not learn from history we are bound to repeat it. Seems that we never learn from the lessons of the past.

  • Anonymous

    And I just read an article from Business Week that looks at both the Reid and Boehner plans.

    “Boehner’s two-step plan would raise the U.S. borrowing limit by up to $1 trillion and later by $1.6 trillion while requiring larger spending cuts, according to Republican aides.

    Reid’s proposal would cut $2.7 trillion in spending and give President Barack Obama the full $2.4 trillion in additional borrowing authority he seeks, enough to get through the 2012 elections.”

    And the Boehner plan also call for (drum roll please) “The Boehner plan calls for a joint committee to report by Nov. 23 on a deficit-cutting package and enact it by Dec. 23 for Obama to receive the remainder of the borrowing authority he has requested.”

    http://www.businessweek.com/news/2011-07-25/reid-boehner-offering-competing-plans-to-raise-debt-ceiling.html

  • SwiftyMorgain

    If you think the Tea Party has only been around for three years look again!

    It was founded on libertarion ideals.

    John Birch Society also had the same Ideology.

    On January 19, 2009, Graham Makohoniuk, a part-time trader and a member of Ticker Forum, posted a casual invitation on the market-ticker.org forums to “Mail a tea bag to congress and to senate,”[34] a tactic that had first been attempted by the Libertarian Party in 1973.[35] The idea quickly caught on with others on the forum, some of whom reported being attracted to the inexpensive, easy way to reach “everyone that voted for the bailout.”[36]

  • http://twitter.com/Phoebe6853 Phoebe Figalilly

    Where does the government get the authority to distribute anyone’s wealth? 

  • http://twitter.com/Phoebe6853 Phoebe Figalilly

    Where does the government get the authority to distribute anyone’s wealth? 

  • Anonymous

    I hope the tea-bullies continue their destruction of the GOP to allow the election of anyone but them.  Remember the last presidential election?  The reactionary right of the GOP had balled things up so much that Obama got elected as he wasn’t a Republican.  I would like to see new people in the Senate, but it isn’t Snowe that’s the problem.  If the tea-bullies get her defeated in the primary, they will lose by sounding levels in the general election, unless they disenfranchise enough moderates and liberals. 

  • Anonymous

    I hope the tea-bullies continue their destruction of the GOP to allow the election of anyone but them.  Remember the last presidential election?  The reactionary right of the GOP had balled things up so much that Obama got elected as he wasn’t a Republican.  I would like to see new people in the Senate, but it isn’t Snowe that’s the problem.  If the tea-bullies get her defeated in the primary, they will lose by sounding levels in the general election, unless they disenfranchise enough moderates and liberals. 

  • Anonymous

    So?

  • Anonymous

    So?

  • Anonymous

    So?

  • Anonymous

    I appreciate your support. I too, am a one man conservative crusade to denigrate a wolf in sheepskins!

  • Anonymous

    I appreciate your support. I too, am a one man conservative crusade to denigrate a wolf in sheepskins!

  • Anonymous

    Let’s start a campaign to get Harriman on the ticket!

  • Anonymous

    Let’s start a campaign to get Harriman on the ticket!

  • Anonymous

    Caribou…

  • Anonymous

    Caribou…

  • Anonymous

    Caribou…

  • Anonymous

    Where does she get the bogieman money from out of state.?  As a voting member of the Aroostook County Republican committee,and co-host of the Aroostook Watchmen Radio show  I will do everything I can to find anyone better to fill that seat.

  • Anonymous

    Where does she get the bogieman money from out of state.?  As a voting member of the Aroostook County Republican committee,and co-host of the Aroostook Watchmen Radio show  I will do everything I can to find anyone better to fill that seat.

  • Anonymous

    Where does she get the bogieman money from out of state.?  As a voting member of the Aroostook County Republican committee,and co-host of the Aroostook Watchmen Radio show  I will do everything I can to find anyone better to fill that seat.

  • Anonymous

    Do you think she may be ” all-out campaign to win the GOP nomination and re-election” because she knows her days in the district of corruption are numbered.  She only votes with a finger in the air or takes a ‘stand’ when the outcome is already a done deal.

  • Anonymous

    George
    Washington said, “The bosom of America is open to receive not only the
    Opulent and respectable Stranger, but the oppressed and persecuted of
    all Nations And Religions; whom we shall welcome to a participation of
    all our rights and privileges, IF BY DECENCY AND PROPRIETY OF CONDUCT
    THEY APPEAR TO MERIT THE ENJOYMENT.”

  • Anonymous

    That was lame and very unpersuasive. “moneytrucker”!
    George Washington did and wrote a lot of things, and if you read them , in context, you would not be using something a leader said in different times  to try and espouse keeping certain people out.
    Perhaps you don’t know what it says on the Statue of Liberty.
    You did not make any case whatosoever.
    And, strange that you searched for something to, in any way, make a defense of  keeping people out. 
    That is NOT what George Washington was saying anyway.
    And, we have evolved from those times  and the world has changed considerably.
    Yes, “decency and propriety”.   Acting civilly towards others is very decent and proper!

    You failed that one.

  • Anonymous

    That was lame and very unpersuasive. “moneytrucker”!
    George Washington did and wrote a lot of things, and if you read them , in context, you would not be using something a leader said in different times  to try and espouse keeping certain people out.
    Perhaps you don’t know what it says on the Statue of Liberty.
    You did not make any case whatosoever.
    And, strange that you searched for something to, in any way, make a defense of  keeping people out. 
    That is NOT what George Washington was saying anyway.
    And, we have evolved from those times  and the world has changed considerably.
    Yes, “decency and propriety”.   Acting civilly towards others is very decent and proper!

    You failed that one.

  • Anonymous

    Ok so what old George said isn’t really what he was saying but the words on Columbia ( the previous name of the Statue of “Liberty”) are sacred (and French)

  • Anonymous

    Why such disdain for the words of the founders and the need to ‘evolve’ the founding documents and history.

  • Anonymous

    Hey, trucker, pack it in.

    “Decency”….yes, it is decent to treat people with respect.  So glad we have evolved away from those times (slavery,etc.)  I think George would approve.

    Oh, I do have “disdain” for some things, trucker, but not for George Washington.
    I have disdain for bigotry and bigoted people and no use for it.
    And I take no history lesson from the likes of you trucker.

    Someone like you cannot interpret what I say or think.

    bye now…

  • Anonymous

    Voting with the repugs is nothing a lot of us would want to do these days.

  • Anonymous

    In no way shape or form is Dodge a leader of the Tea Party movement here in Maine.

  • Anonymous

    JD, as the saying goes  The devil is in the details.

    Reid’s plan is mostly smoke and mirrors.  1 trillion is nothing more than assuming that the wars in Iraq and Afghanistan will be ended.  Nothing like counting as savings money that is not going to be spent anyway.  Another 180 billion is the interest on the 1 trillion that would have been borrowed.   The majority of cuts come from a special bipartisan committee made up of 12 members to recommend another
    round of deficit cutting that would receive guaranteed up-or-down votes
    on the Senate floor by the end of 2011.  In other words, another commission and no guarantee that any of these cuts will actually happen. 

    But the debt ceiling would be raised enough to get past Obama’s reelection campaign in 2012.  No politics here….

    Boehner’s latest plan is only marginally better.  It does at least call for 1.6 trillion in actual cuts.  And yes, another F***ing committee.  At least Obama would get no additional debt limit without making additional cuts as well.  That is the ONLY redeeming value of his plan.  By the way, this IS  A COMPROMISE compared to the original Republican position.

    One thing to remember.  If the debt ceiling is not raised then the government would technically be forced to operate with a balanced budget.  It can spend only as much as it takes in and congress and Obama would have to prioritize spending.  Not as good as a ballenced budget ammendment to the constitution since they will spend most of their time trying to authorize spending more.

    Remember, all of these “plans” are for PROJECTED savings over TEN years.  2.7 trillion in savings when we are talking about projected deficits totaling at least 10 trillion.  And those are only projected.  History shows that deficits are usually significantly higher.  And all of these deficits carefully ignore another 800 lb gorilla hiding in the bushes.  They assume that Social Security payments will be made by using the trust fund.  But the trust fund does not actually exist so all of that money will have to be raised from new taxes or borrowed.

    The down grading of our AAA rating is nothing more than a matter of time.  It may be better if it happens now.  The longer these clowns kick the can down the road the worse the eventual crash will be.

  • Anonymous

    JD, as the saying goes  The devil is in the details.

    Reid’s plan is mostly smoke and mirrors.  1 trillion is nothing more than assuming that the wars in Iraq and Afghanistan will be ended.  Nothing like counting as savings money that is not going to be spent anyway.  Another 180 billion is the interest on the 1 trillion that would have been borrowed.   The majority of cuts come from a special bipartisan committee made up of 12 members to recommend another
    round of deficit cutting that would receive guaranteed up-or-down votes
    on the Senate floor by the end of 2011.  In other words, another commission and no guarantee that any of these cuts will actually happen. 

    But the debt ceiling would be raised enough to get past Obama’s reelection campaign in 2012.  No politics here….

    Boehner’s latest plan is only marginally better.  It does at least call for 1.6 trillion in actual cuts.  And yes, another F***ing committee.  At least Obama would get no additional debt limit without making additional cuts as well.  That is the ONLY redeeming value of his plan.  By the way, this IS  A COMPROMISE compared to the original Republican position.

    One thing to remember.  If the debt ceiling is not raised then the government would technically be forced to operate with a balanced budget.  It can spend only as much as it takes in and congress and Obama would have to prioritize spending.  Not as good as a ballenced budget ammendment to the constitution since they will spend most of their time trying to authorize spending more.

    Remember, all of these “plans” are for PROJECTED savings over TEN years.  2.7 trillion in savings when we are talking about projected deficits totaling at least 10 trillion.  And those are only projected.  History shows that deficits are usually significantly higher.  And all of these deficits carefully ignore another 800 lb gorilla hiding in the bushes.  They assume that Social Security payments will be made by using the trust fund.  But the trust fund does not actually exist so all of that money will have to be raised from new taxes or borrowed.

    The down grading of our AAA rating is nothing more than a matter of time.  It may be better if it happens now.  The longer these clowns kick the can down the road the worse the eventual crash will be.

  • Anonymous

    JD, as the saying goes  The devil is in the details.

    Reid’s plan is mostly smoke and mirrors.  1 trillion is nothing more than assuming that the wars in Iraq and Afghanistan will be ended.  Nothing like counting as savings money that is not going to be spent anyway.  Another 180 billion is the interest on the 1 trillion that would have been borrowed.   The majority of cuts come from a special bipartisan committee made up of 12 members to recommend another
    round of deficit cutting that would receive guaranteed up-or-down votes
    on the Senate floor by the end of 2011.  In other words, another commission and no guarantee that any of these cuts will actually happen. 

    But the debt ceiling would be raised enough to get past Obama’s reelection campaign in 2012.  No politics here….

    Boehner’s latest plan is only marginally better.  It does at least call for 1.6 trillion in actual cuts.  And yes, another F***ing committee.  At least Obama would get no additional debt limit without making additional cuts as well.  That is the ONLY redeeming value of his plan.  By the way, this IS  A COMPROMISE compared to the original Republican position.

    One thing to remember.  If the debt ceiling is not raised then the government would technically be forced to operate with a balanced budget.  It can spend only as much as it takes in and congress and Obama would have to prioritize spending.  Not as good as a ballenced budget ammendment to the constitution since they will spend most of their time trying to authorize spending more.

    Remember, all of these “plans” are for PROJECTED savings over TEN years.  2.7 trillion in savings when we are talking about projected deficits totaling at least 10 trillion.  And those are only projected.  History shows that deficits are usually significantly higher.  And all of these deficits carefully ignore another 800 lb gorilla hiding in the bushes.  They assume that Social Security payments will be made by using the trust fund.  But the trust fund does not actually exist so all of that money will have to be raised from new taxes or borrowed.

    The down grading of our AAA rating is nothing more than a matter of time.  It may be better if it happens now.  The longer these clowns kick the can down the road the worse the eventual crash will be.

  • Anonymous

    JD, as the saying goes  The devil is in the details.

    Reid’s plan is mostly smoke and mirrors.  1 trillion is nothing more than assuming that the wars in Iraq and Afghanistan will be ended.  Nothing like counting as savings money that is not going to be spent anyway.  Another 180 billion is the interest on the 1 trillion that would have been borrowed.   The majority of cuts come from a special bipartisan committee made up of 12 members to recommend another
    round of deficit cutting that would receive guaranteed up-or-down votes
    on the Senate floor by the end of 2011.  In other words, another commission and no guarantee that any of these cuts will actually happen. 

    But the debt ceiling would be raised enough to get past Obama’s reelection campaign in 2012.  No politics here….

    Boehner’s latest plan is only marginally better.  It does at least call for 1.6 trillion in actual cuts.  And yes, another F***ing committee.  At least Obama would get no additional debt limit without making additional cuts as well.  That is the ONLY redeeming value of his plan.  By the way, this IS  A COMPROMISE compared to the original Republican position.

    One thing to remember.  If the debt ceiling is not raised then the government would technically be forced to operate with a balanced budget.  It can spend only as much as it takes in and congress and Obama would have to prioritize spending.  Not as good as a ballenced budget ammendment to the constitution since they will spend most of their time trying to authorize spending more.

    Remember, all of these “plans” are for PROJECTED savings over TEN years.  2.7 trillion in savings when we are talking about projected deficits totaling at least 10 trillion.  And those are only projected.  History shows that deficits are usually significantly higher.  And all of these deficits carefully ignore another 800 lb gorilla hiding in the bushes.  They assume that Social Security payments will be made by using the trust fund.  But the trust fund does not actually exist so all of that money will have to be raised from new taxes or borrowed.

    The down grading of our AAA rating is nothing more than a matter of time.  It may be better if it happens now.  The longer these clowns kick the can down the road the worse the eventual crash will be.

  • Anonymous

    JD, as the saying goes  The devil is in the details.

    Reid’s plan is mostly smoke and mirrors.  1 trillion is nothing more than assuming that the wars in Iraq and Afghanistan will be ended.  Nothing like counting as savings money that is not going to be spent anyway.  Another 180 billion is the interest on the 1 trillion that would have been borrowed.   The majority of cuts come from a special bipartisan committee made up of 12 members to recommend another
    round of deficit cutting that would receive guaranteed up-or-down votes
    on the Senate floor by the end of 2011.  In other words, another commission and no guarantee that any of these cuts will actually happen. 

    But the debt ceiling would be raised enough to get past Obama’s reelection campaign in 2012.  No politics here….

    Boehner’s latest plan is only marginally better.  It does at least call for 1.6 trillion in actual cuts.  And yes, another F***ing committee.  At least Obama would get no additional debt limit without making additional cuts as well.  That is the ONLY redeeming value of his plan.  By the way, this IS  A COMPROMISE compared to the original Republican position.

    One thing to remember.  If the debt ceiling is not raised then the government would technically be forced to operate with a balanced budget.  It can spend only as much as it takes in and congress and Obama would have to prioritize spending.  Not as good as a ballenced budget ammendment to the constitution since they will spend most of their time trying to authorize spending more.

    Remember, all of these “plans” are for PROJECTED savings over TEN years.  2.7 trillion in savings when we are talking about projected deficits totaling at least 10 trillion.  And those are only projected.  History shows that deficits are usually significantly higher.  And all of these deficits carefully ignore another 800 lb gorilla hiding in the bushes.  They assume that Social Security payments will be made by using the trust fund.  But the trust fund does not actually exist so all of that money will have to be raised from new taxes or borrowed.

    The down grading of our AAA rating is nothing more than a matter of time.  It may be better if it happens now.  The longer these clowns kick the can down the road the worse the eventual crash will be.

  • Anonymous

    JD, as the saying goes  The devil is in the details.

    Reid’s plan is mostly smoke and mirrors.  1 trillion is nothing more than assuming that the wars in Iraq and Afghanistan will be ended.  Nothing like counting as savings money that is not going to be spent anyway.  Another 180 billion is the interest on the 1 trillion that would have been borrowed.   The majority of cuts come from a special bipartisan committee made up of 12 members to recommend another
    round of deficit cutting that would receive guaranteed up-or-down votes
    on the Senate floor by the end of 2011.  In other words, another commission and no guarantee that any of these cuts will actually happen. 

    But the debt ceiling would be raised enough to get past Obama’s reelection campaign in 2012.  No politics here….

    Boehner’s latest plan is only marginally better.  It does at least call for 1.6 trillion in actual cuts.  And yes, another F***ing committee.  At least Obama would get no additional debt limit without making additional cuts as well.  That is the ONLY redeeming value of his plan.  By the way, this IS  A COMPROMISE compared to the original Republican position.

    One thing to remember.  If the debt ceiling is not raised then the government would technically be forced to operate with a balanced budget.  It can spend only as much as it takes in and congress and Obama would have to prioritize spending.  Not as good as a ballenced budget ammendment to the constitution since they will spend most of their time trying to authorize spending more.

    Remember, all of these “plans” are for PROJECTED savings over TEN years.  2.7 trillion in savings when we are talking about projected deficits totaling at least 10 trillion.  And those are only projected.  History shows that deficits are usually significantly higher.  And all of these deficits carefully ignore another 800 lb gorilla hiding in the bushes.  They assume that Social Security payments will be made by using the trust fund.  But the trust fund does not actually exist so all of that money will have to be raised from new taxes or borrowed.

    The down grading of our AAA rating is nothing more than a matter of time.  It may be better if it happens now.  The longer these clowns kick the can down the road the worse the eventual crash will be.

  • Anonymous

    JD, as the saying goes  The devil is in the details.

    Reid’s plan is mostly smoke and mirrors.  1 trillion is nothing more than assuming that the wars in Iraq and Afghanistan will be ended.  Nothing like counting as savings money that is not going to be spent anyway.  Another 180 billion is the interest on the 1 trillion that would have been borrowed.   The majority of cuts come from a special bipartisan committee made up of 12 members to recommend another
    round of deficit cutting that would receive guaranteed up-or-down votes
    on the Senate floor by the end of 2011.  In other words, another commission and no guarantee that any of these cuts will actually happen. 

    But the debt ceiling would be raised enough to get past Obama’s reelection campaign in 2012.  No politics here….

    Boehner’s latest plan is only marginally better.  It does at least call for 1.6 trillion in actual cuts.  And yes, another F***ing committee.  At least Obama would get no additional debt limit without making additional cuts as well.  That is the ONLY redeeming value of his plan.  By the way, this IS  A COMPROMISE compared to the original Republican position.

    One thing to remember.  If the debt ceiling is not raised then the government would technically be forced to operate with a balanced budget.  It can spend only as much as it takes in and congress and Obama would have to prioritize spending.  Not as good as a ballenced budget ammendment to the constitution since they will spend most of their time trying to authorize spending more.

    Remember, all of these “plans” are for PROJECTED savings over TEN years.  2.7 trillion in savings when we are talking about projected deficits totaling at least 10 trillion.  And those are only projected.  History shows that deficits are usually significantly higher.  And all of these deficits carefully ignore another 800 lb gorilla hiding in the bushes.  They assume that Social Security payments will be made by using the trust fund.  But the trust fund does not actually exist so all of that money will have to be raised from new taxes or borrowed.

    The down grading of our AAA rating is nothing more than a matter of time.  It may be better if it happens now.  The longer these clowns kick the can down the road the worse the eventual crash will be.

  • Anonymous

    JD, as the saying goes  The devil is in the details.

    Reid’s plan is mostly smoke and mirrors.  1 trillion is nothing more than assuming that the wars in Iraq and Afghanistan will be ended.  Nothing like counting as savings money that is not going to be spent anyway.  Another 180 billion is the interest on the 1 trillion that would have been borrowed.   The majority of cuts come from a special bipartisan committee made up of 12 members to recommend another
    round of deficit cutting that would receive guaranteed up-or-down votes
    on the Senate floor by the end of 2011.  In other words, another commission and no guarantee that any of these cuts will actually happen. 

    But the debt ceiling would be raised enough to get past Obama’s reelection campaign in 2012.  No politics here….

    Boehner’s latest plan is only marginally better.  It does at least call for 1.6 trillion in actual cuts.  And yes, another F***ing committee.  At least Obama would get no additional debt limit without making additional cuts as well.  That is the ONLY redeeming value of his plan.  By the way, this IS  A COMPROMISE compared to the original Republican position.

    One thing to remember.  If the debt ceiling is not raised then the government would technically be forced to operate with a balanced budget.  It can spend only as much as it takes in and congress and Obama would have to prioritize spending.  Not as good as a ballenced budget ammendment to the constitution since they will spend most of their time trying to authorize spending more.

    Remember, all of these “plans” are for PROJECTED savings over TEN years.  2.7 trillion in savings when we are talking about projected deficits totaling at least 10 trillion.  And those are only projected.  History shows that deficits are usually significantly higher.  And all of these deficits carefully ignore another 800 lb gorilla hiding in the bushes.  They assume that Social Security payments will be made by using the trust fund.  But the trust fund does not actually exist so all of that money will have to be raised from new taxes or borrowed.

    The down grading of our AAA rating is nothing more than a matter of time.  It may be better if it happens now.  The longer these clowns kick the can down the road the worse the eventual crash will be.

  • Anonymous

    JD, as the saying goes  The devil is in the details.

    Reid’s plan is mostly smoke and mirrors.  1 trillion is nothing more than assuming that the wars in Iraq and Afghanistan will be ended.  Nothing like counting as savings money that is not going to be spent anyway.  Another 180 billion is the interest on the 1 trillion that would have been borrowed.   The majority of cuts come from a special bipartisan committee made up of 12 members to recommend another
    round of deficit cutting that would receive guaranteed up-or-down votes
    on the Senate floor by the end of 2011.  In other words, another commission and no guarantee that any of these cuts will actually happen. 

    But the debt ceiling would be raised enough to get past Obama’s reelection campaign in 2012.  No politics here….

    Boehner’s latest plan is only marginally better.  It does at least call for 1.6 trillion in actual cuts.  And yes, another F***ing committee.  At least Obama would get no additional debt limit without making additional cuts as well.  That is the ONLY redeeming value of his plan.  By the way, this IS  A COMPROMISE compared to the original Republican position.

    One thing to remember.  If the debt ceiling is not raised then the government would technically be forced to operate with a balanced budget.  It can spend only as much as it takes in and congress and Obama would have to prioritize spending.  Not as good as a ballenced budget ammendment to the constitution since they will spend most of their time trying to authorize spending more.

    Remember, all of these “plans” are for PROJECTED savings over TEN years.  2.7 trillion in savings when we are talking about projected deficits totaling at least 10 trillion.  And those are only projected.  History shows that deficits are usually significantly higher.  And all of these deficits carefully ignore another 800 lb gorilla hiding in the bushes.  They assume that Social Security payments will be made by using the trust fund.  But the trust fund does not actually exist so all of that money will have to be raised from new taxes or borrowed.

    The down grading of our AAA rating is nothing more than a matter of time.  It may be better if it happens now.  The longer these clowns kick the can down the road the worse the eventual crash will be.

  • Anonymous

    JD, as the saying goes  The devil is in the details.

    Reid’s plan is mostly smoke and mirrors.  1 trillion is nothing more than assuming that the wars in Iraq and Afghanistan will be ended.  Nothing like counting as savings money that is not going to be spent anyway.  Another 180 billion is the interest on the 1 trillion that would have been borrowed.   The majority of cuts come from a special bipartisan committee made up of 12 members to recommend another
    round of deficit cutting that would receive guaranteed up-or-down votes
    on the Senate floor by the end of 2011.  In other words, another commission and no guarantee that any of these cuts will actually happen. 

    But the debt ceiling would be raised enough to get past Obama’s reelection campaign in 2012.  No politics here….

    Boehner’s latest plan is only marginally better.  It does at least call for 1.6 trillion in actual cuts.  And yes, another F***ing committee.  At least Obama would get no additional debt limit without making additional cuts as well.  That is the ONLY redeeming value of his plan.  By the way, this IS  A COMPROMISE compared to the original Republican position.

    One thing to remember.  If the debt ceiling is not raised then the government would technically be forced to operate with a balanced budget.  It can spend only as much as it takes in and congress and Obama would have to prioritize spending.  Not as good as a ballenced budget ammendment to the constitution since they will spend most of their time trying to authorize spending more.

    Remember, all of these “plans” are for PROJECTED savings over TEN years.  2.7 trillion in savings when we are talking about projected deficits totaling at least 10 trillion.  And those are only projected.  History shows that deficits are usually significantly higher.  And all of these deficits carefully ignore another 800 lb gorilla hiding in the bushes.  They assume that Social Security payments will be made by using the trust fund.  But the trust fund does not actually exist so all of that money will have to be raised from new taxes or borrowed.

    The down grading of our AAA rating is nothing more than a matter of time.  It may be better if it happens now.  The longer these clowns kick the can down the road the worse the eventual crash will be.

  • Anonymous

    JD, as the saying goes  The devil is in the details.

    Reid’s plan is mostly smoke and mirrors.  1 trillion is nothing more than assuming that the wars in Iraq and Afghanistan will be ended.  Nothing like counting as savings money that is not going to be spent anyway.  Another 180 billion is the interest on the 1 trillion that would have been borrowed.   The majority of cuts come from a special bipartisan committee made up of 12 members to recommend another
    round of deficit cutting that would receive guaranteed up-or-down votes
    on the Senate floor by the end of 2011.  In other words, another commission and no guarantee that any of these cuts will actually happen. 

    But the debt ceiling would be raised enough to get past Obama’s reelection campaign in 2012.  No politics here….

    Boehner’s latest plan is only marginally better.  It does at least call for 1.6 trillion in actual cuts.  And yes, another F***ing committee.  At least Obama would get no additional debt limit without making additional cuts as well.  That is the ONLY redeeming value of his plan.  By the way, this IS  A COMPROMISE compared to the original Republican position.

    One thing to remember.  If the debt ceiling is not raised then the government would technically be forced to operate with a balanced budget.  It can spend only as much as it takes in and congress and Obama would have to prioritize spending.  Not as good as a ballenced budget ammendment to the constitution since they will spend most of their time trying to authorize spending more.

    Remember, all of these “plans” are for PROJECTED savings over TEN years.  2.7 trillion in savings when we are talking about projected deficits totaling at least 10 trillion.  And those are only projected.  History shows that deficits are usually significantly higher.  And all of these deficits carefully ignore another 800 lb gorilla hiding in the bushes.  They assume that Social Security payments will be made by using the trust fund.  But the trust fund does not actually exist so all of that money will have to be raised from new taxes or borrowed.

    The down grading of our AAA rating is nothing more than a matter of time.  It may be better if it happens now.  The longer these clowns kick the can down the road the worse the eventual crash will be.

  • Anonymous

    JD, as the saying goes  The devil is in the details.

    Reid’s plan is mostly smoke and mirrors.  1 trillion is nothing more than assuming that the wars in Iraq and Afghanistan will be ended.  Nothing like counting as savings money that is not going to be spent anyway.  Another 180 billion is the interest on the 1 trillion that would have been borrowed.   The majority of cuts come from a special bipartisan committee made up of 12 members to recommend another
    round of deficit cutting that would receive guaranteed up-or-down votes
    on the Senate floor by the end of 2011.  In other words, another commission and no guarantee that any of these cuts will actually happen. 

    But the debt ceiling would be raised enough to get past Obama’s reelection campaign in 2012.  No politics here….

    Boehner’s latest plan is only marginally better.  It does at least call for 1.6 trillion in actual cuts.  And yes, another F***ing committee.  At least Obama would get no additional debt limit without making additional cuts as well.  That is the ONLY redeeming value of his plan.  By the way, this IS  A COMPROMISE compared to the original Republican position.

    One thing to remember.  If the debt ceiling is not raised then the government would technically be forced to operate with a balanced budget.  It can spend only as much as it takes in and congress and Obama would have to prioritize spending.  Not as good as a ballenced budget ammendment to the constitution since they will spend most of their time trying to authorize spending more.

    Remember, all of these “plans” are for PROJECTED savings over TEN years.  2.7 trillion in savings when we are talking about projected deficits totaling at least 10 trillion.  And those are only projected.  History shows that deficits are usually significantly higher.  And all of these deficits carefully ignore another 800 lb gorilla hiding in the bushes.  They assume that Social Security payments will be made by using the trust fund.  But the trust fund does not actually exist so all of that money will have to be raised from new taxes or borrowed.

    The down grading of our AAA rating is nothing more than a matter of time.  It may be better if it happens now.  The longer these clowns kick the can down the road the worse the eventual crash will be.

  • http://www.facebook.com/profile.php?id=719791897 Chris Grindle

    Good question I suppose…but I dont hear you complaining when corporations get huge R & D grants….I dont hear you complaining when companies get a free pass from “economic development councils”(corporate welfare), I dont hear you complaining when oil companies artificially inflate gas prices. I dont hear you complaining about not raising the debt ceiling so that the stock market will crash and then all the wealthy republicans can swoop in a buy stock for pennies on the dollar,while everyone else lose’s their shirt if their retirement is tied to the stock market.  Just saying.

  • http://www.facebook.com/profile.php?id=719791897 Chris Grindle

    GOP= Scorched Earth Policy. If the sand box doesnt play by their rules….destroy the sand box.  

  • http://www.facebook.com/profile.php?id=719791897 Chris Grindle

    GOP= Scorched Earth Policy. If the sand box doesnt play by their rules….destroy the sand box.  

  • http://www.facebook.com/profile.php?id=719791897 Chris Grindle

    GOP= Scorched Earth Policy. If the sand box doesnt play by their rules….destroy the sand box.  

  • http://www.facebook.com/profile.php?id=719791897 Chris Grindle

    GOP= Scorched Earth Policy. If the sand box doesnt play by their rules….destroy the sand box.  

ADVERTISEMENT | Grow your business

Marketplace Coupons

ADVERTISEMENT | Grow your business