Jury awards $3M in medical malpractice case

Posted July 01, 2011, at 5:09 a.m.
Print this   E-mail this    Facebook this   Tweet this     

AUBURN, Maine — The Androscoggin County Superior Court jury deliberated for roughly four hours Wednesday and two hours Thursday before reaching a split verdict.

It found that Irene Meyers, a midwife, breached the standard of care when she oversaw the birth of Hannah Tilton and that her failure caused Tilton injuries.

The jury awarded Tilton nearly $2.3 million for future medical and health care expenses, plus $345,000 for past medical expenses and $500,000 for the girl’s permanent impairment and loss of enjoyment of life.

The jury rejected a claim against the hospital that alleged it represented Meyers or her practice as its agent.

The jury also rejected the claim of Tilton’s mother, Johanna Xochitil, that she was unable to function as a result of her mental illness starting at the time of her daughter’s birth and lasting for at least two years.

At issue were questions about the cause of her medical problems and whether the midwife aiding in her delivery was responsible for any of those problems.

The nine-day trial spanned three weeks. The judge handed over the case to the jury of four women and five men at noon Wednesday. The jury was instructed to resume deliberations at 8:30 a.m. Thursday.

Hannah Tilton, now 10, was born at Central Maine Medical Center in Lewiston with severe mental retardation. She uses a wheelchair and must use a feeding tube for sustenance. She is blind and can’t speak or communicate verbally, according to lawyers involved in the case.

She lives with her father, Phillip Tilton, who sued on behalf of his daughter. Until this year, she lived in a state foster home.

Tilton was diagnosed with Kabuki syndrome, a rare genetic disorder that derives its name from the facial features found in people born with it.

Tilton’s attorney, William McKinley, had argued that the disorder doesn’t explain all of Hannah Tilton’s symptoms. She must have suffered injury because of a lack of oxygen during labor when a fetal monitor indicated there was a problem.

Christopher Nyhan, an attorney for Irene Meyers, the midwife, argued that Meyers followed standard medical care procedures, an assertion that he said was backed by the obstetrician who took over the delivery and the nurses who assisted.

See more news from the Sun Journal at http://www.sunjournal.com/.

Similar articles:

Marketplace News

Marketplace

Guidelines for posting on bangordailynews.com

The Bangor Daily News encourages comments about stories, but you must follow our terms of service.

In brief:

  1. Keep it civil and stay on topic
  2. No vulgarity, racial slurs, name-calling or personal attacks.
  3. People who harass others or joke about tragedies will be blocked.

The primary rule here is pretty simple: Treat others with the same respect you'd want for yourself. Here are some guidelines (see more):

  • Anonymous

    Father jumps in and takes over when money got involved. Sad.

  • Anonymous

    It appears that way…..but perhaps he couldn’t afford to take care of her and now with the settlement he can.   She has many disabilities that requires around the clock care.

  • Anonymous

    It appears that way…..but perhaps he couldn’t afford to take care of her and now with the settlement he can.   She has many disabilities that requires around the clock care.

  • Anonymous

    It appears that way…..but perhaps he couldn’t afford to take care of her and now with the settlement he can.   She has many disabilities that requires around the clock care.

  • Anonymous

    It appears that way…..but perhaps he couldn’t afford to take care of her and now with the settlement he can.   She has many disabilities that requires around the clock care.

  • Anonymous

    It appears that way…..but perhaps he couldn’t afford to take care of her and now with the settlement he can.   She has many disabilities that requires around the clock care.

  • Anonymous

    The girl lives with her father now instead of a state foster home. This money is for her long time care and her needs will be great. Instead of slamming the dad, perhaps you should be commending him for the sacrifice he is making in taking responsibility for her care. This is an act of love, not greed. You should be ashamed of yourself for your low blow comment. Sad.

  • Anonymous

    The girl lives with her father now instead of a state foster home. This money is for her long time care and her needs will be great. Instead of slamming the dad, perhaps you should be commending him for the sacrifice he is making in taking responsibility for her care. This is an act of love, not greed. You should be ashamed of yourself for your low blow comment. Sad.

  • Anonymous

    The girl lives with her father now instead of a state foster home. This money is for her long time care and her needs will be great. Instead of slamming the dad, perhaps you should be commending him for the sacrifice he is making in taking responsibility for her care. This is an act of love, not greed. You should be ashamed of yourself for your low blow comment. Sad.

  • Anonymous

    The girl lives with her father now instead of a state foster home. This money is for her long time care and her needs will be great. Instead of slamming the dad, perhaps you should be commending him for the sacrifice he is making in taking responsibility for her care. This is an act of love, not greed. You should be ashamed of yourself for your low blow comment. Sad.

  • Anonymous

    The girl lives with her father now instead of a state foster home. This money is for her long time care and her needs will be great. Instead of slamming the dad, perhaps you should be commending him for the sacrifice he is making in taking responsibility for her care. This is an act of love, not greed. You should be ashamed of yourself for your low blow comment. Sad.

  • Anonymous

    The girl lives with her father now instead of a state foster home. This money is for her long time care and her needs will be great. Instead of slamming the dad, perhaps you should be commending him for the sacrifice he is making in taking responsibility for her care. This is an act of love, not greed. You should be ashamed of yourself for your low blow comment. Sad.

  • Anonymous

    The girl lives with her father now instead of a state foster home. This money is for her long time care and her needs will be great. Instead of slamming the dad, perhaps you should be commending him for the sacrifice he is making in taking responsibility for her care. This is an act of love, not greed. You should be ashamed of yourself for your low blow comment. Sad.

  • Anonymous

    The girl lives with her father now instead of a state foster home. This money is for her long time care and her needs will be great. Instead of slamming the dad, perhaps you should be commending him for the sacrifice he is making in taking responsibility for her care. This is an act of love, not greed. You should be ashamed of yourself for your low blow comment. Sad.

  • Anonymous

    The girl lives with her father now instead of a state foster home. This money is for her long time care and her needs will be great. Instead of slamming the dad, perhaps you should be commending him for the sacrifice he is making in taking responsibility for her care. This is an act of love, not greed. You should be ashamed of yourself for your low blow comment. Sad.

  • Anonymous

    The girl lives with her father now instead of a state foster home. This money is for her long time care and her needs will be great. Instead of slamming the dad, perhaps you should be commending him for the sacrifice he is making in taking responsibility for her care. This is an act of love, not greed. You should be ashamed of yourself for your low blow comment. Sad.

  • Anonymous

    im confused…. so what did the hospitol do wrong?  A midwife whom the mother of the child wanted to deliver her baby, then it had some complicaion and the hospitol had to take over… so the child was born with a genetic issue and other(i feel sad for this) but kids are born  everyday with medical issue the hospitol isn’t being sued on all those are they? she wanted the midwife

  • Anonymous

    im confused…. so what did the hospitol do wrong?  A midwife whom the mother of the child wanted to deliver her baby, then it had some complicaion and the hospitol had to take over… so the child was born with a genetic issue and other(i feel sad for this) but kids are born  everyday with medical issue the hospitol isn’t being sued on all those are they? she wanted the midwife

  • Anonymous

    im confused…. so what did the hospitol do wrong?  A midwife whom the mother of the child wanted to deliver her baby, then it had some complicaion and the hospitol had to take over… so the child was born with a genetic issue and other(i feel sad for this) but kids are born  everyday with medical issue the hospitol isn’t being sued on all those are they? she wanted the midwife

  • Anonymous

    im confused…. so what did the hospitol do wrong?  A midwife whom the mother of the child wanted to deliver her baby, then it had some complicaion and the hospitol had to take over… so the child was born with a genetic issue and other(i feel sad for this) but kids are born  everyday with medical issue the hospitol isn’t being sued on all those are they? she wanted the midwife

  • Anonymous

    Here’s a fact sheet on Kabuki syndrome. Looks like most people with this disorder have some degree of mental retardation… http://www.ssbp.co.uk/ssbp/media/syndromes/kabuki_syn.pdf

  • Anonymous

    A tragedy for sure, but still a case of greed on the fathers part. I just wonder how nice a home, and how many toys will start to show up at the dad’s place. How pathetic. Just another reason we need major tort reform.

  • Anonymous

    The jury had evidence we do not in this short recap. Not all of her symptoms were genetic oriented. She suffered a lack of oxygen during birth which resulted in further problems.

    Lawsuits are not always malicious in their intent and aimed at punishment. Mistakes get made, we are all human, and doctors and midwives fit into that category, too. This is why they carry insurance.

    Plaintiffs do not always win malpractice suits. The evidence must be there and a jury of ordinary citizens must agree with it. You might have a different opinion of the result if it were you sitting on that jury panel.

  • Anonymous

    The jury had evidence we do not in this short recap. Not all of her symptoms were genetic oriented. She suffered a lack of oxygen during birth which resulted in further problems.

    Lawsuits are not always malicious in their intent and aimed at punishment. Mistakes get made, we are all human, and doctors and midwives fit into that category, too. This is why they carry insurance.

    Plaintiffs do not always win malpractice suits. The evidence must be there and a jury of ordinary citizens must agree with it. You might have a different opinion of the result if it were you sitting on that jury panel.

  • Anonymous

    The jury had evidence we do not in this short recap. Not all of her symptoms were genetic oriented. She suffered a lack of oxygen during birth which resulted in further problems.

    Lawsuits are not always malicious in their intent and aimed at punishment. Mistakes get made, we are all human, and doctors and midwives fit into that category, too. This is why they carry insurance.

    Plaintiffs do not always win malpractice suits. The evidence must be there and a jury of ordinary citizens must agree with it. You might have a different opinion of the result if it were you sitting on that jury panel.

  • Anonymous

    You have no idea how much it is going to cost in medical care over this young girl’s lifetime. Would you prefer that she remain in a state foster care home and have the state and medicare pick up all the costs? Put your politics aside and try to think rationally for a minute.

    You don’t know this child’s father and ASSUME he is motivated entirely by greed. Not everyone shares your set of values, thank God.

  • Anonymous

    You have no idea how much it is going to cost in medical care over this young girl’s lifetime. Would you prefer that she remain in a state foster care home and have the state and medicare pick up all the costs? Put your politics aside and try to think rationally for a minute.

    You don’t know this child’s father and ASSUME he is motivated entirely by greed. Not everyone shares your set of values, thank God.

  • Anonymous

    I love how conservatives can sit in judgement of others especially when all they have for evidence is what is published in a news story. I wonder if it were amconservative who’s child suffered this same fate if he would be willing to take on the burden of caring as this father has? 

ADVERTISEMENT | Grow your business

Marketplace Coupons

ADVERTISEMENT | Grow your business