10 years after Logan’s death, Maine foster care is US model

Posted Jan. 28, 2011, at 10:25 a.m.
Last modified Jan. 28, 2011, at 9:51 p.m.
Print this   E-mail this    Facebook this   Tweet this  
Christy Reposa (left) and Katlyn Badger, the biological mother and grandmother of 5-year-old Logan Marr, weep during the sentencing hearing nine years ago for Sally Ann Schofield in Kennebec County Superior Court in Augusta.
Jim Evans | AP
Christy Reposa (left) and Katlyn Badger, the biological mother and grandmother of 5-year-old Logan Marr, weep during the sentencing hearing nine years ago for Sally Ann Schofield in Kennebec County Superior Court in Augusta.
Sally Ann Schofield sits in the Lincoln County Courthouse in Wiscasset in 2002 listening to Superior Court Justice Thomas Delahanty read his verdict. Schofield was found guilty of manslaughter in the death of her foster daughter Logan Marr.
Joe Phelan | AP
Sally Ann Schofield sits in the Lincoln County Courthouse in Wiscasset in 2002 listening to Superior Court Justice Thomas Delahanty read his verdict. Schofield was found guilty of manslaughter in the death of her foster daughter Logan Marr.
Robert F. Bukaty | AP

PORTLAND, Maine — Five-year-old Logan Marr’s death at the hands of her foster mother a decade ago was a tragedy that highlighted the vast shortcomings of Maine’s child welfare system.

She was a little girl who loved grape soda, butterflies and the PBS cartoon “Arthur,” and experts say Logan’s death served as a catalyst for widespread changes that transformed Maine’s foster care system into one of the best in the nation.

Logan died Jan. 31, 2001 — 10 years ago Monday — after her foster mother, Sally Schofield, confined her to a highchair in the basement of her Chelsea home and wrapped layers of duct tape around her head, mouth and chest. Logan suffocated, and Schofield is serving a 17-year sentence after her conviction for manslaughter.

In the years since, the number of children in foster care in Maine has been cut in half. Those who are in the foster care system are three times more likely to be placed with family members than with strangers. Caseworkers now visit foster children at least once a month, rather than the three-month standard back then.

Maine’s child welfare system has been held up as a national model by the Annie E. Casey Foundation, a private organization in Baltimore that works on child welfare issues. Harvard’s Kennedy School of Government named it a finalist for its prestigious Innovations in American Government awards in 2009.

Logan’s death was the driving force behind the improvements, said Jim Beougher, director of the Office of Child and Family Services at the Maine Department of Health and Human Services. The case helped awaken the department to respond to abuse and neglect cases more quickly and see foster children in their homes more often.

“I think Logan’s tragedy crystallized that for us,” Beougher said.

Logan Marr wasn’t breathing when police were called to Sally Schofield’s home on Jan. 31, 2001. She later was pronounced dead at an Augusta hospital.

Schofield, who was a former foster care caseworker herself, was serving as a foster parent for Logan and her half sister Bailey, a toddler at the time. The girls had been taken from their mother by the state.

Schofield told police Logan struck her head after falling from a highchair during a timeout. But investigators were suspicious because of inconsistencies in her story and because Logan’s eyes showed signs of hemorrhages consistent with suffocation. An autopsy determined that the girl died from asphyxiation.

At the trial the next year, prosecutors demonstrated how Schofield used 42 feet of duct tape to cover Logan’s mouth, strap her jaw shut and bind her to a highchair in a cluttered basement after the girl awoke from an afternoon nap screaming. Schofield was acquitted of murder, but a judge found her guilty of manslaughter.

The case shone a spotlight on Maine’s troubled foster care system, which came under fire after Logan’s death.

The PBS public affairs show “Frontline” ran a three-part series, “Failure to Protect,” that focused on the Logan Marr case and Maine’s child welfare system. The series raised questions on why the state removed Logan from her mother’s custody in the first place, and whether it failed to heed warning signs that she was in trouble under Schofield’s care.

A child’s death always spurs changes in child welfare systems, said Richard Wexler, executive director of the National Coalition for Child Protection Reform in Alexandria, Va. Often those changes are for the worse, he said, but the reforms in Maine — to the state’s credit — were good.

Since 2001, the number of children taken from their homes has dropped by 30 percent, and the number of children in foster care on any given day has been cut in half, he said.

At the same time, the proportion of foster children placed in group homes and other institutions has dropped from about 28 percent to 10 percent, making Maine one of the best in the nation at avoiding placing foster children in “congregate care” settings, Wexler said.

It has been said that reforming a child welfare system is “like fixing a bicycle while you’re riding it,” Wexler said.

“Nobody’s reached the mountaintop yet, but Maine is halfway to two-thirds there,” Wexler said. “Most of the rest of the country is just getting off the ground.”

Tracy Feild, of the Annie E. Casey Foundation, said child welfare managers, caseworkers and advocates, as well as some legislators from Virginia, Louisiana, Maryland and Indiana, have visited Maine in recent years to get a firsthand look at its child welfare system.

“Maine was not on the map as being a leader in the past,” Feild said. “Now they’re viewed as having really good outcomes.”

Similar articles:

BDN Marketplace News

Marketplace Businesses

Guidelines for posting on bangordailynews.com

The Bangor Daily News encourages comments about stories, but you must follow our terms of service.

In brief:

  1. Keep it civil and stay on topic
  2. No vulgarity, racial slurs, name-calling or personal attacks.
  3. People who harass others or joke about tragedies will be blocked.

The primary rule here is pretty simple: Treat others with the same respect you'd want for yourself. Here are some guidelines (see more):

  • Anonymous

    I don’t remember this story from back then…but it made me tear up today :( Poor little sweet innocent child. This evil woman should have her face completely duct taped shut and smothered to DEATH!!!!!

  • http://www.facebook.com/people/Alice-Clark-Goldsmith/1558404341 Alice Clark Goldsmith

    Where is Sally Schofield now?

  • Anonymous

    =*(

  • Anonymous

    are foster parents tested for drug use before and during their time spent as a foster parent ?

  • Anonymous

    Jail. Probably out of state like they tend to do in cases like these.

  • Anonymous

    Foster parents and adoptive parents have to go through a home study before becoming foster parents, which entails quite a detailed investigation into their current and past activities and lifestyle. I believe that would include a background check. I do not think they all have to go through drug testing, as someone with a drug problem would probably not get through the homestudy without this somehow coming up. (not saying it’s impossible).

    The problem becomes when a child is placed into a home and there is not enough oversight into how the child is doing in the home. The article states that case workers visit the children monthly, but I know of many cases in which that does not happen. Case workers are often overloaded, and they do not all visit all of their children every month. There definitely is still progress to be made in the system.

  • Anonymous

    She is serving a 17-year sentence for manslaughter, the article says.

  • Anonymous

    I don’t believe that Maine should be held up as a national model for the child welfare system. There is still too many children that fall through the cracks here. And once a month is NOT enough for welfare workers to be checking up on high-risk children.

  • Anonymous

    We are a licensed foster care home and no, we didn’t have to go thru any drug screening. But, a year of paperwork, inspections and visits – including fingerprinting and background checks before we got our license would probably derail many people with drug problems.

  • Anonymous

    We are a licensed foster care home and no, we didn’t have to go thru any drug screening. But, a year of paperwork, inspections and visits – including fingerprinting and background checks before we got our license would probably derail many people with drug problems.

  • Centaurmyst

    There are a few things about this case that is very disturbing. First, the mother lost custody only because she took her children to her mother’s house. Apparently DHHS forbid her from taking the children to see their grandmother. I’m not sure why that was, though. It wasn’t the mother that did anything wrong to her children. The foster mother was a case worker that was supposed to be protecting children from abuse. Not only did she have the power to take children from their parents, she also was given custody of children that had been taken away. She was cleared to ADOPT these children…away from a mother who was NOT harming them. That is seriously messed up. I’m glad things have changed since then, but this should be a wake up call to all those people who are constantly saying that DHHS should take children away from their families. It’s always best for a child to remain with their parents if at all possible and if not, then another family member.

  • Anonymous

    Too bad a child had to die before reforms were instituted.

  • http://pulse.yahoo.com/_CE3BA4IPU4C2VY4EWDQ3663FIU Diane

    To hell with the Annie E. Casey foundation! State child “protection” services is an oxymoron.

  • http://www.facebook.com/metalligimp Brian Harnish

    Cases like this make me realize that sometimes “eye for an eye” is the best course of action.

  • Anonymous

    As a foster parent I can say Maine is not a state that should be held up as an example!! There are alot of issues that need to be figured out. Keeping a child in their home is not always ideal and I fear that there are children that are being kept in unsafe homes, just to keep the number of kids in foster homes down. Caseworkers are reviewed on how many kids are kept in the home and kept out of foster care. This is so wrong. They should be reviewed on doing what is best for the child. If that means removing them from an unsafe environment, that is what is means. Parents are given too many chances.

  • Anonymous

    No they arent tested for drugs. However they do background checks, finger prints, and home studies. If they were to test everyone for drugs that want to be foster parents, You would find that the majority of the faster homes would be shut down and then where would these innocent children be? Maine wouldnt be able to afford all the orphanages that would be needed.

  • http://pulse.yahoo.com/_ZSBAAXFEXTIBDSRA5X3FA6TSG4 jersey

    why is the biological mother so upset. she had her two children taken from her she wasnt any prize.

  • http://pulse.yahoo.com/_ZSBAAXFEXTIBDSRA5X3FA6TSG4 jersey

    I work with kids who are being abused and the system leaved them in the home. They may have cu the numbers but the amount of screwed up families didnt go down.

  • http://pulse.yahoo.com/_ZSBAAXFEXTIBDSRA5X3FA6TSG4 jersey

    Just because the kids are left in the home does not mean they are safe. HOw many days were they abandoned at the grandmothers house.

  • Anonymous

    “Maine’s child welfare system has been held up as a national model ”

    Man…I’m scared for the children now.

  • Anonymous

    I hear what your saying but foster parents might be a little biased about keeping children out of their biological homes so that foster homes are still needed. Or maybe they want to adopt a child so they look for any reason why a child should not go home. Not saying that there not sometimes reasons but just like all biological parents are not bad all foster parents are as pure as the drive snow either.

  • Centaurmyst

    Obviously they were safer with the grandmother than they were with the DHHS child welfare worker because the grandmother didn’t duct tape the child up so they couldn’t breathe and stuck them in the basement.

  • Centaurmyst

    Probably because her children were taken away and put in the home of a murderous child welfare worker.

  • Anonymous

    This women should NEVER see Daylight,She should have done to her what she did to this little girl,Just my opinion

  • Anonymous

    It will be less than once a month soon enough. Juat wait for Lepage to get done cutting budgets for DHHS.

  • Anonymous

    Why is the mother upset that her child has been murdered? Are you for real?

  • Anonymous

    I guess they don’t give IQ tests to people who work with abused kids…

  • Anonymous

    Guilt…for letting her be in the hands of this monster..I remember this so well..it didn’t seem 10 years ago~~This was such an upsetting incident..The child was just beautiful..how anyone could that to to a child is just unbelievable.

  • Anonymous

    As a foster parent, we see caseworkers in our home and also caseworker takes time talking to foster child without foster parents present(in short, child can speak freely if problem with foster home). The DHHS system is not and never will be perfect……….. the cost is a big factor…… also every child is different and needs are different. Foster homes are paid very well, $16.50 a day/69 cents per hour………… so don’t judge all foster parents by one certain foster home.
    DHHS is always looking for foster parents………….. under paid, on call 24 hours a day, sit many nights next to child’s bed till the nightmares stop, attend training meetings, have kids steal from you, and cry when they leave praying you made a little difference. Bangor Daily, write an article about good foster home through the eyes of a foster parent or foster child. Most rewarding job ever!

  • Anonymous

    It should have been life…without parole..she look that little girls life…

  • Anonymous

    Another case where my opposition to the death penalty leaves me grinding my teeth…

  • Anonymous

    jj

  • Anonymous

    It’s interesting how the state prides itslef in decreasing the number of children placed in foster care by putting them with family members. This is obviously preferred, however I would be willing to bet that the a large amount of the family who take in these children are not adequate either, puting children at continued risk. The other reason why children are not going to group homes is because funding has been cut so very drastically and there are times when this level of care is necessary. They make the numbers sound good, but next to keeping children safe, the states motivation appears to be a cost saving one.

  • Anonymous

    Although the preferred placement for children would be with family members, I have seen/heard of numerous examples of this not being any better for the child due to the dysfunction of the family as a whole. When the state prides itself in saying it has cut the need for foster families and group homes, I dare say that this is more of a cost saving measure and secondly about the safety of the child.

  • Anonymous

    I’ve been a foster, adoptive, step and biological parent to many children over the years. We do this not for the money (cents per hour) but because my husband grew up in foster care and we want to help other children, mostly teens, as he was helped by his fabulous foster parents growing up. The children we have been foster parents to have all had special needs (various mental illnesses, mental retardation, autism, etc.) in addition to suffering from abuse or neglect in the birth home. Most of our kids have been sexually abused, most have been injured at least one time or another by domestic violence, most have food issues related to not being fed appropriately at least for a portion of their lives, 4 of our kiddos have had parents die and the relatives have not stepped forward due to their special needs, etc. We have had our car stolen, holes punched in walls, doors ripped from the hinges, been assaulted and have had our pets and bio children suffer abuse at times. Caring for kids in foster care is much more difficult than caring for your biological children. Your friends distance themselves from you as your children often damage their belongings or steal from them, your household maintenance bills are through the roof, you find rotton, hoarded food in the strangest of places, many have hygiene issues that they resist changing, etc. It is a difficult, difficult task that is very rewarding. When a child comes back as an adult and thanks you for all that you have done and shares how well they are doing, it makes it all worth it. There are many, many wonderful foster families in Maine. Of course, as there is in any walk of life, there are those who do it for the money (which is peanuts compared to many other states) and are not 100% committed to changing childrens lives. We have 1 teenage foster son right now and his caseworker recently shared that she has 65 people (bio parents who have monitoring and foster children) that she needs to see and speak with in private each month. The caseworkers visit once and month and speak with the children in private and each of our children is assigned a Guardian Ad Litum who visits them at least once every three months and represents the child in court. This case was a tragedy and I agree that this lady should be in prison for life. Fostering is a difficult and stressful “job” but our job is to protect, support, teach and nurture these children and those with no coping skills and/or anger management issues are supposed to be weeded out during the whole home study process. From what I remember from this case, Sally Schofield didn’t even have a homestudy done and was given a license based on her DHHS caseworker status.

  • Anonymous

    MZL, this is a huge assumption. The majority of the kids on my caseload are with relatives, whether it be aunt and uncles, grandparents, “fictive kin” like family friends and so on. Very often extended families are normal, functional and totally appropriate. Just because one person has significant life issues, doesn’t mean their familes are also disfunctional. More often than not, there is a relative out there who is willing and perfectly capable of caring for these children. DHHS has just done a better job seeking these people out. These relatives are now required to become licensed just like foster parents, so that if reunification with their parents isn’t possible, the family members can adopt the children sooner.

  • Anonymous

    Having worked in a residential treatment facility as a Therapeutic Foster Parent for almost 9 years, I understand completely what you are saying. DHHS workers are overwhelmed with their case loads, but they do follow through with the children, Guardian Ad Litums are typically attorneys who take care of the children legally, but don’t see them as often as the Case Workers. Having experienced first hand the destruction, assaultive behavior directed towards the caregivers, and the often suicidal tendencies of these children it seems that many of the children in care were either left in the dangerous homes too long, or have learned behavior from other children in different settings, be it foster care or hospitalizations. The coping skills taught to children at very young ages are absent in these children…we ARE here to protect, support, teach and nurture. No one is going to get rich being a Foster Parent, it is not an easy job, and often the outcome of the child is sad no matter how hard one tries to help them succeed. My hat is off to ALL Foster Parents who try to make a difference in a childs life.

  • Anonymous

    I remember this well! I have always felt that this woman should have been confined to a basement, and been completely covered with duct tape—let her feel the terror that this little child must have felt— 17 years is nothing! This little one only got to have 5, because of some brute that couldn’t keep it together–if she could do this, who knows what in the name of God else she did to her??—-Anyone that can do this to a child, should never see the light of day again!

  • Anonymous

    The grandmother didn’t kill the child—A so special foster mother took care of that!

  • Anonymous

    You are correct that not all parents are bad, and that is not what I am saying, but there are too many children that are kept in bad situations that will affect them for the rest of their life. I never really understood this until I became a foster parent.

  • Anonymous

    Oh my… how nice is it to see an article about the progress our State makes rather than it’s deficits. While sad to hear about Logan, kudos to those in charge of Foster Care in Maine!

  • Anonymous

    poor lil girl

  • Anonymous

    she shouldnt ever have ANY contact with ANY kids…

  • Anonymous

    Why should they be tested for drugs? “Real” (biological) parents aren’t.

  • Anonymous

    It’s all about the children..they are a precious gift that needs to be cherished and it truly does take a village to raise them. They are brought into this world as innocent beings and those that harm or neglect should be ashamed of themselves!

  • Anonymous

    I’m glad they repaired the system to this level……………………. I saw first hand what they did to some of these kids, it wasn’t nice…… I believe taking kids was a revenue generater for the State back in the Angus King days……………. You know the Fed Gov paying by the head, what a sick way of funding it……..Well Good job and keep up the good work..

  • Anonymous

    Thanks for the work that you are doing as a foster parent. Despite its challenges. It is very important to the kids in foster care. I think you make some excellent points. Simply keeping kids out of foster is one thing – making sure that they are being well cared for, are safe and that their parents have the tools they need to care for their children is another thing entirely.

  • Anonymous

    It’s funny how the same people that scream for DHHS to be cut, are likely the same people screaming for caseworkers to do more.

  • Anonymous

    And to second undertow521 on that….if there are doubts about a family member there is a lot of thought and consideration that goes into whether this placement will work out along with f frequent monitoring and contact to make sure things do go okay.

  • Anonymous

    To Whom it may concern:
    I was a ward of the state for 15 years and I can tell you from being a foster child that the Foster system in the state of maine is far from even good let alone very good. I have found that almost 85% of the foster homes are in it for the money. There is just a handful that really do it for the kids. They all say that it is for the kids, but when the social worker leaves then the truth really comes out. I had been abused in one foster home and even after I was removed from that home, they continued being foster parents. and were still foster parents until just a few years ago. This happened to me back in 1985. What does that say about the foster care system and the case workers. I saw mine one time in 2 years. That was the norm. I think that if they say that they see the kids once a month that is great, “IF,” it is true. I really have a hard time believing it. I lived it! I tried to become a foster parent because I know more about what kids go through than most. DHS did everything they could to make sure that was not going to happen. After 2 years, multiple home inspections, background checks (3 times) and at least 4 different case workers. Everytime we got almost ready to be accepted, we had to start over with a new caseworker. After 2 years we quit. I have no sympathy for DHS and the social workers that claim they are overworked. There is a few there I am sure that work hard, but the ones I delt with over the years, not so much. I am hoping that the New Governor for this state will lean out the lazy people in the DHS System. The ones that really work should get a pay raise.

  • Anonymous

    To Whom it may concern:
    I was a ward of the state for 15 years and I can tell you from being a foster child that the Foster system in the state of maine is far from even good let alone very good. I have found that almost 85% of the foster homes are in it for the money. There is just a handful that really do it for the kids. They all say that it is for the kids, but when the social worker leaves then the truth really comes out. I had been abused in one foster home and even after I was removed from that home, they continued being foster parents. and were still foster parents until just a few years ago. This happened to me back in 1985. What does that say about the foster care system and the case workers. I saw mine one time in 2 years. That was the norm. I think that if they say that they see the kids once a month that is great, “IF,” it is true. I really have a hard time believing it. I lived it! I tried to become a foster parent because I know more about what kids go through than most. DHS did everything they could to make sure that was not going to happen. After 2 years, multiple home inspections, background checks (3 times) and at least 4 different case workers. Everytime we got almost ready to be accepted, we had to start over with a new caseworker. After 2 years we quit. I have no sympathy for DHS and the social workers that claim they are overworked. There is a few there I am sure that work hard, but the ones I delt with over the years, not so much. I am hoping that the New Governor for this state will lean out the lazy people in the DHS System. The ones that really work should get a pay raise.

  • Anonymous

    Sally did not learn this at home. These actions have impacted a lot of people. A whole lot. None more so than Logan Marr and her family.

  • Anonymous

    Keep in mind that the Foster Mother was also a retired Social Worker for DHS.

  • Anonymous

    Notice I did not use the words “all” or “everyone”, there are always exceptions. I am sharing my experiences as you are sharing yours (my experiences as being there were usually no responsible family members/friends). Agreed that often one family member can have significant issues and not the others, but I have observed the dysfunction as something that is part of family history (and keeps repeating). First and foremost children should be placed with someone they know and trust.

  • Anonymous

    It goes both ways. Some kids should be removed from there biological homes and others should not. It happened all the time when I was growing up. I knew someone where the kids should have been removed and were not and there are others that the kids were placed in foster homes and should have been left with the parents. DHS had no legal grounds to take the kids.

  • Anonymous

    I feel I can judge Foster Parents and Foster Homes. I went through over 22 homes in 2 1/2 years. I feel I have earned that right. Out of all of then only 3 really cared about what happened to me and the kids they had in there home. The rest were clearly in it for the money and really did not care about the kids at all. I was nothing more than a paycheck. I saw it over and over again.

  • Anonymous

    There is a Major Difference in a Therapeutic Foster Home and the Regular run of the mill Foster Home. You just can’t compare the two. Therapeutic Foster Home is the best and most complete setup for appropriate child care. The regular run of the mill foster home just can’t be compared. I have lived in both.

  • http://pulse.yahoo.com/_NYEPECTBTH263HREXSIVUTHF7I NA8VENURSE

    SHE IS IN WINDHAM,………HAS N0 REM0RSE WHATS0EVER……

  • Anonymous

    I’m surprised she didn’t get jailhouse justice via shank then.

  • Anonymous

    That’s the way it always is in situations like this. The absolute worst-case tragedy has to happen before any kind of reform happens. I understand the legalities of ruling manslaughter instead of murder, but I sure don’t agree with them. This sick bi*ch is going to be out in 5 years or so while that poor baby has been cold in the ground for a decade. A decade where she should have been moving from grade school to middle school, braces and friends. Makes me absolutely crazy. Will this woman, this horrible, nasty piece of work, have to register as any kind of danger to children? Who is she going to move next door to? Me? You?

  • Anonymous

    I’m confused. Is the Annie E. Casey Foundation the same as Casey Services? I thought they were a good agency?

  • Anonymous

    No, we don’t have to do drug testing but I would be willing to do it. I can’t imagine someone being able to do drugs and get away with it being a foster parent. We do know ppl who lost their foster parent license because the dad liked his nightly beer a little too much and knew a lady who adopted her foster daughter just because the state changed the laws concerning smoking around foster children and she didn’t want to have her foster daughter move but wasn’t willing to give up smoking in her house and car. Of course, she never came out and said it, but it was read between the lines from what she did say about adoption. :( If you adopt, you can smoke in your house, if you foster, you can’t.

  • Anonymous

    There is a major difference in the 2, I agree completely. Therapeutic Foster Parents are trained to teach coping skills, and also how to USE them. We are skilled in the different aspects of abuse and mental illness. We all have choices to make. But ultimately it is the combination of teaching, directing, structuring, listening, & nurturing that help the child, and us as role models provide the best possible outcome for any child in foster care. Believe me, I am not blowing my own horn, I have been in situations with children where my thoughts were not always positive, but my decision to use my coping skills hopefully showed them that they can do so also. Thank you for your input to my comment, you are what true Foster Parents hope for :)

  • Anonymous

    Take it from me, as someone who works as a behavioral health professional for children in therapeutic foster care, the state is not making money on taking kids into foster care. These kids are not taken out for no reason and the state works hard on “reunification” which often is nearly impossible due to the abuse and/or neglect the children experienced under the care of their biological parent(s). The work can be heart-breaking and heart-warming at times, due to the range of emotions and issues these foster children and families go through. In the past two years, our agency has seen a large reduction in the number of referrals for foster children and workers who have left have not been replaced. I’d like to remind everyone that reductions in state spending often mean a reduction in pay to foster parents, state workers, and workers such as myself who work hard to make sure these kids have a safe and therapeutic living environment.

  • Anonymous

    Take it from me, as someone who works as a behavioral health professional for children in therapeutic foster care, the state is not making money on taking kids into foster care. These kids are not taken out for no reason and the state works hard on “reunification” which often is nearly impossible due to the abuse and/or neglect the children experienced under the care of their biological parent(s). The work can be heart-breaking and heart-warming at times, due to the range of emotions and issues these foster children and families go through. In the past two years, our agency has seen a large reduction in the number of referrals for foster children and workers who have left have not been replaced. I’d like to remind everyone that reductions in state spending often mean a reduction in pay to foster parents, state workers, and workers such as myself who work hard to make sure these kids have a safe and therapeutic living environment.

  • Centaurmyst

    DHHS should always do everything they can to help keep a family together. Sometimes children do need to be removed but they are always better off with family members. If not family members then close family friends that they are familiar with. It is traumatic to place a child with strangers and it does permanent damage to a child. There needs to be more of a focus placed on HELPING the family overcome the issues that are bad for the children. In most cases that can be achieved, even if it takes some time. That is always going to be in the best interest of everyone.

  • Centaurmyst

    Contact Casey Family Services if you want to be a foster parent. DHHS is not the only ones that coordinate foster care.

  • Anonymous

    Well said. Thank you for all your work.

  • Olde Hippie

    You may be a record holder. Congratulations for surviving and a super thank you for telling about the three homes that really cared about you. Missus Olde Hippie and I fostered for a private agency where the state sent their special needs and “hard core” children. We were paid extremely well and in turn we were required to attend very frequent educational meetings and our worker was in our home at least weekly and available to us 24/7. The excellent pay was intended to provide enough income so that a foster parent could “parent” without depending on a job outside the home. The agency was reimbursed by the state; it was a system that worked and a system that I wish the state could implement for all of their foster care.

  • Olde Hippie

    The simple act of removing the death penalty from the list of options challenges you and I to dig deeper in order to find a suitable solution.

  • Olde Hippie

    Thanks momof25 for all you do.

  • Olde Hippie

    So true. In an ideal system every child in foster care would be treated as special needs and be placed in a therapeutic home.

  • http://pulse.yahoo.com/_RX23W5V7A2J6BYTBB3MZJE5ZKA Jeff D

    You can’t seriously believe and say all you’ve written here with a straight-face. Maine, as well as every state, is paid incentive money from the USDHHS when they take children from homes. It was more prevalent ten years ago, but then nobody died from having their head rapped in duct tape prior to that.

  • http://pulse.yahoo.com/_RX23W5V7A2J6BYTBB3MZJE5ZKA Jeff D

    You can believe about the revenue generator, I know it as fact. I used to know the federal code number for this particular law and would be willing to find it again. It shows other economic incentives for any state to grab if they want to do the dirty work behind it. You wouldn’t believe!

  • http://pulse.yahoo.com/_RX23W5V7A2J6BYTBB3MZJE5ZKA Jeff D

    The other thing I was going to say was, they haven’t “repaired the system to this level,” rather scaled back the atrocities.

  • http://pulse.yahoo.com/_RX23W5V7A2J6BYTBB3MZJE5ZKA Jeff D

    The other thing I was going to say was, they haven’t “repaired the system to this level,” rather scaled back the atrocities.

  • harry H Snyder

    Unfortunately Logan Marr was not the catalyst which caused change in MAine’s child welfare system. In fact Marr was the second child killed by an ex DHS caseworker. Does anyone remember Ricky LeTourneau and Deborah Wolfenden? Ricky was 4 and he was physically assaulted, and murdered by his mother for not urinating where he was supposed to. Everyone said “something should be done” and then promptly forgot to do anything. so 10 years later, Logan paid for the inaction.

    Maine foster care has improved marginally, but saying “Maine foster care is US model,” is like saying “That old moldy sandwich is the best food in the dump.”

    Foster care is a system with problems which can not be fixed. Children are cared for by well meaning (generally) folks who are paid for this care. These folks have no long-term investment in the child, and the child feels “punished” for actions committed by the adults in his life. Aside from this the child is “changed” by this experience independent of the family to which he will return.

    Although foster care in Maine has changed, the results of foster care (after the system withdraws) has not changed. The most recent figures (after the reduced population) are from 2008. these figures show that a majority of ex-foster care children still are disproportionally represented in prison, homeless shelters, and mental health impatient programs.

    The inadequacies in the system which allowed Logan Marr to be placed with an inappropriate foster parent still exist. In other words the exact same tragedy could happen in Maine again.

  • Anonymous

    she is a monster and shouldn’t be allowed any contact with any children..ever..not even family members, that try to “hide” her…she should be hidden for the rest of her life!!..no use for her “hider” person either

  • Anonymous

    I so agree with you, Centaurmyst. I have seen this very thing that you decribe first hand with people that I know. DHHS has too much power in this state over families. The fact that children can be ADOPTED after being taken away from their parents is really, really, bad. It’s downright scary!! And this little girl died at the hands of this DHHS worker, something that the mother will never, ever heal from. I don’t believe that Maine should be the model for the child welfare system nationwide. I think that it is B.S.

  • Anonymous

    I agree.

  • Anonymous

    God bless you!

  • Anonymous

    It is extremely sad that a child had to die before anyone would do anything about the short comings of the foster care system. I could have told them 11 years earlier that there was problems with the system. I spent 2 years in the Maine foster care system. The first place I stayed was horible (forced slave labor, if you didn’t scrub the floor just right you went hungry for the whole day, no food or water), fortunatley my second placement was not. Thanks to the care and love I got in that second home I am who I am today.

  • http://www.facebook.com/people/Regina-Billotti/100000542958830 Regina Billotti

    Technically, that’s true. Caseworkers always give a reason for removing children. But sometimes these reasons are trivial – on one occasion, I remember a boy being removed because his parents let him ride a bicycle without a helmet – or because of problems that, although they need to be addressed, can be solved without removing the children from their families. Ones that I see come up often are housing not up to building codes, or working parents leaving their children unattended because they don’t have adequate child care arrangements.

  • Anonymous

    I see firsthand the Maine child welfare system in action on a daily basis and find it absolutely horrifying that anyone would call it a leader in the field. This is nothing more than a numbers game that does not take actual CHILD WELFARE into consideration. Maine DHHS has suffered many blackeyes in recent years (well deserved blackeyes) and will do anything to try to cover up their absolute incompetence. The best way to do that is by providing numbers and statistics that sound good. Make no mistake Maine’s changes to their system are about money first, perception a close second and child welfare a distant third. Leave it to BDN to once again be nothing more than part of the propaganda machine.

  • Anonymous

    I see firsthand the Maine child welfare system in action on a daily basis and find it absolutely horrifying that anyone would call it a leader in the field. This is nothing more than a numbers game that does not take actual CHILD WELFARE into consideration. Maine DHHS has suffered many blackeyes in recent years (well deserved blackeyes) and will do anything to try to cover up their absolute incompetence. The best way to do that is by providing numbers and statistics that sound good. Make no mistake Maine’s changes to their system are about money first, perception a close second and child welfare a distant third. Leave it to BDN to once again be nothing more than part of the propaganda machine.

  • Anonymous

    Great the foster care system has been changed…..I don’t think, by looking at the number of children NOT in foster homes is a way to “idealize” the system. It just means that children are left in the same situations….which, I’m positive that they just learn how to “cover up” what is going on, so the kids aren’t taken away. In a lot of situations, family members are just as bad, and allow the children to see the parents of the child whom they were taken from. I don’t see the system being the “BEST”……there is still A LOT of children that shouldn’t be where they are…..I think if you are going to fix the system, then find decent foster homes…….these children cannot remain in the home or placed with family members….that is NOT fixing the problem….they are still in the same environment………Have you ever read books by Dave Peltzer? “A Child Called It”……he was removed from his home and had visits with his psycho mother who would abuse him on their visits…..if he told anyone, she threatened he would be made to move back in with her…..so he endured her beatings and then had a safe foster home………..??!!! I suppose, at least, he realized that what his mother was doing was wrong and that there WERE safe places to be…..It’s all messed up. It all boils down to one thing…….IF THE PARENTS TOOK CARE OF THEIR CHILDREN IN THE FIRST PLACE AND DIDN”T NEGLECT OR ABUSE THEM, THEN THIS WOULD NOT BE AN ISSUE AT ALL. IF YOU CAN’T TAKE CARE OF ‘EM……..DON’T HAVE ‘EM!!!!

  • http://www.facebook.com/people/Regina-Billotti/100000542958830 Regina Billotti

    What do you think the Annie E. Casey foundation is doing wrong?

  • http://www.facebook.com/people/Regina-Billotti/100000542958830 Regina Billotti

    Her baby boy was taken away from her and her husband when it happened, and when her jail time is over, one of the terms of her release is that she have no unsupervised contact with pre-teen children.

  • http://www.facebook.com/people/Regina-Billotti/100000542958830 Regina Billotti

    No, it doesn’t mean that kids are “in the same situation”.

    There is a continuum between removing the children and not intervening at all. The middle ground involves actually assisting the family – with drug treatment, counseling, transportation, child care assistance, or whatever services are appropriate, to help them get their act together without needing to remove the children. And there are plenty of instances where a family has real problems, but those problems can be solved without taking the children away.

  • Anonymous

    The barrier that I think exists is the continued shrinking dollars for services/supports/resources that are supposed to be helping these families.

  • http://www.facebook.com/people/Regina-Billotti/100000542958830 Regina Billotti

    True enough.

  • http://pulse.yahoo.com/_UGSEM5VH4GOQCUVXM4G6TTEUIY Poster

    I had sally for several of my foster kids. She was very cold and unsupportive to myself as the foster parent or to the children.

  • http://www.facebook.com/people/Regina-Billotti/100000542958830 Regina Billotti

    Agreed, but maybe the prosecutors weren’t sure they could prove intent to kill, which is legally necessary for a murder sentence. The manslaughter charge may have been the best they were able to do.

  • http://pulse.yahoo.com/_UGSEM5VH4GOQCUVXM4G6TTEUIY Poster

    this case worker had a serious God complex

  • Anonymous

    Dont know why the did not burn this ex DHS worker, for killing a child.. Its about time for this overblown agency to go away also….Private Org could sure do the job better and with half the cost…Hopefully the DHS idea of takeing someones children from them and then keeping them theirselves and killing the kids is over with. Hopefully this DHS worker will die in jail…..

  • Anonymous

    Judges make decisions about child custody. And while a DHHS worker may request a POC the judge ultimately rules on that. Once the child is in care, all additional orders of placement are decided by a judge. Children are represented by a GAL (guardian ad litem and DHHS reports to the judge both the setbacks and advancements of the biological parent. The guidelines have changed since you were in foster care — hopefully for the better. Children were always thought to be better off with their biological parents so kids were moved from foster home to foster home less they become attached to their foster parents making a transition back to the biological parents more difficult. It is now observed that while continued life long contact with biological family is benefical to improve longterm outcomes (less jail, less substance abuse, etc) allowing a child to be adopted and obtain a sense of perminancy and belonging are equally important. Parents are not given unlimited time anymore.
    As a foster parent and potential adoptive parent my goal is always to help each child feel a sense of belonging, safety and acceptance. Should my husband and I decided to adopt (if we do it will be a sibling group that would likely otherwise be split) we will make it a top priority to maintain some kind of contact with as many members of the biological family as possible. A child deserves that. Open adoptions often best serve the child and after all we became foster parents to serve children — we are college educated with 4 biological children. I include this only to stress it is not for the money or the lack of being parents already. We have had and do have teens — uggh! And when our children need us to leave work because they are sick or need to attend meetings or appointments we loose more money per hour than is paid in a day by DHHS to care for a child. There are many good, even great foster parents who are doing all they can for children others would not give up their fancy cars and trips to help (those people typically criticize the most) and unfortunately it is the bad/sad cases like this one that get the attention of the media and the public.

  • harry H Snyder

    So it is OK to kill an ugly child?

  • Anonymous

    Ummm, yeah, it’s true. Maybe to the parents who have the children removed there is “no reason” why they should take the kids out but then they might think locking a kid in the trunk of a car is a good idea as well as extreme physical and sexual abuse. In my line of work, we try to work with the parents if they are willing. DHHS gives them plenty of opportunities to change their ways so it’s not like they don’t have a choice. Yes the state gets money, as you say, but it’s not profiting from it. The money goes to all the workers, foster parents, transportation costs, clothes, keeping the offices open, etc. It is necessary to due the work. There are more kids NOT in foster care these days. Whether this is good or bad I’m not making a judgment on.

  • Anonymous

    read the post~~~~ of course not..but she was a very beautiful child…she was just adorable..I don’t know if you remember the videos they had of her at Christmas..but she was so cute…seemed like a sweet child…please do not twist my words…I did not say that …

  • Anonymous

    I hope Sally Schofield die’s in prison on in the 16th year and 364 day of her sentence! This is a case that called for the state to have the death penalty!

  • Anonymous

    You have to take driver’s ed and pass a test to get your license. I had to graduate college and pass a very difficult state exam to get my job, but anyone can become a parent/foster parent…weird.

  • Anonymous

    I understand that you are on the other end. Until you live the life I lived in the System, you can’t relate. I am sure the systen of foster care has changed. As for changing for the good. I just can’t see it. I have a nephew that was adopted into a family in Bangor somewhere and I never even met him. I was not allowed to meet him or know anything about him, per DHS. So when you try to tell me it is for the best I guess you just don’t know the whole picture and what really happens behind the scenes. I am sure that you truely care, and that is great, but do you think it was right for DHS to take my sisters child without giving the family a chance to give him a home? Like I said I was not even allowed to be at the hospital when he was born. They has a guard at the door. What kind of system are they really running in Augusta. Really think about it……………

  • Anonymous

    Finally someone who gets it. It is nice to hear from someone who feels the same way I do.

  • Anonymous

    My wife and I went through this for 2 years and were told off the record that we will never be allowed to become foster parents from a case worker who has know me my whole life and just did not like me or my family. That lady has since retired but now we have our own child and I just do not see the point in going through hell again just to repeat the emotional pain and frustration all over again.

  • Anonymous

    That lady should get life with no chance of parole. There is no excuse!!!!!!!!!!!!!

  • Anonymous

    I am not sure who fed you this line, but you have been lied to. Sorry……………..

  • Anonymous

    Been there, done that. I know what you are talking about.

  • Anonymous

    Not just anyone, I guess it depends on who you are and who you know. It doesn’t matter if you are a good canidate for the job or if you even know what the kids really need, ( patience and understanding).

  • Anonymous

    I can gaurantee that no Court System Judge signed off on it either. Just a note to the one above who seems to think DHS does nothing without a judges OK.

  • Anonymous

    2 years is long enough. I was in it for 15 years till the State dumped me at 16 years old and I had to find my own place to live.

  • Anonymous

    With an agency that is staffed by about 85+ percent females, Who (females)are non responsive
    to about 80+ percent of Child sexual abuse, (When committed by a family member/or current live in), according to every independent study ever done, One need not wonder why it is such a mess. A Judge almost has to follow DHHS recommendation period, or be removed. This agency should be closed, or at the very least, have there powers reduced. I realize some Children need help, but something better then this agency needs to be put in place.

  • Anonymous

    assumptions. I guess your point of the story is political. If there is no waste in that department you will be safe…

  • Anonymous

    I would think an orphanage would be cheaper. it could be in a school like setting year round. imagine giving the kids who need it the most a great education.

  • http://www.facebook.com/profile.php?id=1452684179 Jason Simonds

    There is a fine line here…

    What is not being discussed is the damage done when ia child is removed from the parent(s). It can be totally devastating to both parties and especially damaging to infants.

    Recent studies have confirmed that ACE (adverse childhood experiences) cause permanent changes in the structure of the brain. Is it more ACE to remove or to leave?

    When a situation gets to the point where a child is being taken away, we should have a group home that is offered as an alternative, where the child and parent(s) can learn how to live a different way. Separation and isolation does not help the situation and the trauma caused by separation adds to the emotional issues that are already present.

    Yes, of course, if the child is in danger something has to be done, but we need more the two sided coin we use to determine their paths… it isn;t as simple as just removing the child from the home.

    Group Homes. If we have the ability to legally take children from a home we can gain more by forcing the whole issue and removing the whole problem as a unit and fixing it for ever… rather than have this issue continue for generations.

    But hey.. it is a new day… the GOP is here and I am sure they will have this problem well in hand soon. Those lazy useless system sucking do nothings don’t deserve help, so soon it won’t be a state problem…

  • harry H Snyder

    Sorry to all you folks who believe in the “goodness” of a State agency or the myth that DHS is fulfilling its mandate.

    I will admit that things have changed, BUT here is a true story:

    In the 1990′s I was a “Court Appointed Special Advocate” I did several cases where I and the attorney for DHS agreed We all got along famously. Then there was a case where a father was accused of sexual abuse. I did a little digging and found that the complainant had a history of lying, that there were (according to psychiatric tests) no recorded indicators that this abuse had taken place and finally that while this abuse was supposed to have taken place in Maine, during the period of these allegations, the father was out of the country (in the service) I presented my findings to the court in the form of a report, and the day of the trial it was like someone forgot to turn on the heat in the courthouse. The only person (other than the judge) who would talk to me was the father’s attorney who told me that my time as a “volunteer” CASA was probably over. I didn’t believe him. The CASA’s were (I believed at the time) independent advocates.

    Well the court gave me one more case. the night of my appointment John Hawks (the attorney for DHS called me at home (a clear violation of the rules of procedure) he told me to withdraw from the new case or he would make life tough for me. I laughed in his face and filed a complaint with the Maine bar claiming Mr Hawks had threatened me and had had a case related discussion with me without all the attorney’s present.

    The next day I got a call from my supervisor at CASA. She asked me to withdraw from this case on my own or I would be discharged. I said she would have to fire me. She slammed the phone down, and a half an hour later her assistant called me and in a very appoligetic voice told me that I no longer was a volunteer for CASA.

    I got one final call from the DHS attorney who called and asked: “So you understand now?”

  • Anonymous

    I would never presume to understand the circumstances of your particular situation. I have not lived that perspective. That said I always try to see the point of view of all involved in whatever the situation I am involved in. Take Care — sounds like you are making some thoughtful decisions as an adult.

  • Anonymous

    They removed the children from a KNOWN threat and placed them with a, seemingly, trained person. That trained person killed her, no question about that, but there were very serious issues with the biological mother and grandmother. Monday morning quarterbacking is all this is. If you had been looking at the situation prior to the poor little girl’s death, you would have wanted the children removed. Trust me.
    Scholfield murdered that child (despite the ruling) but no one would have thought her a threat prior to the death. The place those children were living (and visiting) was a very serious threat. That being said, hindsight is 20/20… the kids should have been removed but obviously they should have been placed with someone that wasn’t going ot kill that little girl.

  • http://www.facebook.com/people/Regina-Billotti/100000542958830 Regina Billotti

    I don’t trust you.

    Logan Marr complained about Sally Schofield before she was murdered. Her complaints were never investigated.

    Caseworkers are not supposed to adopt children, (as I understand it) but they decided to bend standard procedure for Schofield.

    Caseworkers were supposed to visit children in foster homes on a quarterly basis. This was not done.

    Caseworker Allison Peters bashed Christy Marr for things like missing appointments, while ignoring it when Schofield did the same.
    She also fabricated aspects of her reports on Christy Marr, e.g. exaggerating the amount of times she moved.

    Logan and Bailey Marr were taken from a situation where (per the findings of licensed therapists) they had never been abused – not by Christy Marr, not by any other family members – and placed with two abusive foster parents in a row.

    This is in no wise a case of “Monday morning quarterbacking.” Caseworkers are not infallible, and this incident was foreseeable and preventable. It would have been preventable if Allison Peters had done her duty – procedures already in place would have prevented this from happening – and had not already made up her mind to have the girls adopted out.

  • Anonymous

    IF MAINE IS A MODEL FOR THE NATION IM SCARED TO DEATH! get rid of Robin whitney and a few others in her click! this woman has blood on her hands and kept her job after this little girls death I in no way no the family of this girl but would love to get the real story from them instead of the CULT dhhs version! Robin herself was a drug addict and look at the case workers like Brandy Lachance from hampden a child protective worker who 2 months ago her house was raided by hampden police for drug trafficking by her husband and she has her job still going into homes removing children for this very thing ROBIN shame on you! remember your husband that beat you and ur cocain overdose robin? I worked with you people and so glad i do not now! your all so guilty OF MURDER and destroying many inncocent families

  • Anonymous

    it is not wrong that the workers are reviewed by how many kids are kept in the home. it is the LAW title 22 says you must do everything possible to prevent removal ..over the years ive seen so many children taken for reasons that were totally not in the best interest of the child. services in the home should have been offered! but no no we need to boost the economy and for every dollar we spend on a foster child the federal govt gives us back 2! including the ridiculous amount of money we spend building rooms on foster parents homes and paying for care for these kids out of a possibly safe home with their blood family not all foster parents are bad but mnost are in it for money they CLAIM THEY DONT MAKE. I know better I worked in that area and they make good money not as much as in the past but they did and do still make a living raising kids i know very few that are in it for the right reasons and thank you to those ones…that are in it for love of a child…all to many are in it for a buck thankfully the rates foster parents make dropped and lord behold the amount of children in care has dropped,,,hmmm maybe dhs isnt taking kids because they have to be a lil more careful with the limited homes we now have? raise the foster parnets daily pay and see the number of licensed homes climb and then we can hire more workers and take more kids and hire more clinicians and so on…boost our economy! by breaking almost healthy homes up and let these foster family’s wanna keep these kids and their checks as long as they can rather than restore a family

  • Anonymous

    Part of your statement is true – anyone can become a parent (anyone who is biologically capable). BUT, anyone who wants to be a foster or adoptive parent has to go through an extensive homestudy, which includes lots of questions and investigating into their family history, finances, etc. So it’s not exactly true that anyone can be a foster parent. They have background checks, etc. A LOT more than what anyone has to do to just be a birth parent.

    Most foster parents I know are NOT in it for the money. I understand that some of the people posting have been through the system, and I do not think it is perfect by any means. However, I don’t think this should be about dissing the large number of foster parents who DO truly care about the children they are bringing into their home. I encourage folks not to make the accusation of “they’re in it for the money” until you’ve actually walked a mile in their shoes. Again, I am sure there are some foster parents with the wrong intentions, but many if not most are there because they care about children. They could make a lot more by going out and getting a job and not having to deal with all the challenges of the system. Foster parent’s pay has been cut significantly in the state of Maine over the past years, and the cost of living has gone up. What they are “making” is sometimes barely enough to cover the cost of food, clothing, travel to and from appointments and visits, etc for the child.

  • Anonymous

    She remains in-state, a mere hour from where Logan died.

  • Anonymous

    You are correct, they tried, but could not prove intent to kill. Manslaughter was the best they could get, with the highest sentence.

    In her own twisted way, I don’t think Sally intended to kill Logan that night, she just got (even more) carried away. This was not the first time Logan had visited that basement, bound to that highchair.

  • harry H Snyder

    Gawd someone who still advocates institutional care.

  • harry H Snyder

    …and that is what happens to a majority of foster children. I apologize for my part (as a taxpayer) in your tragedy.

    We as a people should be ashamed of the way we treat children.

  • Anonymous

    I am sorry, but I take exception to your comments. My husband and I make a very good living and the very little amount of money that is provided to me to take care of my foster child basically covers what it cost me to feed, cloth, diaper and increased utilities/maintenance to take care of her. I spend alot of money out of pocket for her becuase I care and do not want to drain the state of more money than needed. I look at this as a service to my community. I am emotionlly spent and cannot take in any further foster children, so no, I do not want to keep the system going to I can take in more children so I can earn a buck. This is extreemely hard work. I am a mother, wife, home owner, and professional and add on top of that foster parent…it is not easy. I have just heard and seen first hand accounts of children being placed and kept in unsafe environments so kids can be kept out of foster homes becuase that is the directive. In the end it should be all about keeping the child safe…no matter what that means, with the parent, with family, with a foster home or in a group setting. I don’t care what the safe environment is as long as it is safe.

  • Anonymous

    I am Logans grand mother, Logan is very close to my heart, there isn’t a day go by that I don’t think of her.this tradgity has torn this family completely apart. i was once asked–”is there life after Logan” the answer is simple ” no” not for me anyways.Logan- where ever you are I love you baby girl, hugs and kisses Nanny

ADVERTISEMENT | Grow your business

BDN Marketplace Coupons

ADVERTISEMENT | Grow your business
ADVERTISEMENT | Grow your business