In this September 2020 file photo, a Versant Power worker coils up a line on Silver Road in Bangor after cutting service for debris cleanup and line repairs. A storm had brought high winds and knocked out power to more than 100,000 people. Credit: Linda Coan O'Kresik / BDN

The BDN Opinion section operates independently and does not set newsroom policies or contribute to reporting or editing articles elsewhere in the newspaper or on bangordailynews.com.

Joshua Broder is the CEO of Tilson, an information infrastructure development company in Portland, and the co-chair of Maine’s Economic Recovery Committee. He served as an Army Signal Officer and earned a Bronze Star in Afghanistan. He is a member of the Versant Power board of directors.

Maine is laying the foundation for a transformational period in our state.

With federal support, smart planning and steady leadership through the global COVID-19 crisis, we have an opportunity to emerge stronger, more resilient and better prepared to meet the challenges of the future.

We shouldn’t gamble that strength away on a multi-billion dollar government takeover of the state’s electrical grid. That is what LD 1708, a bill being considered by the Maine Legislature’s Energy Committee, seeks to do.

I understand the frustration of those who are in favor of the takeover. They want faster action, more investment, better responsiveness and lower rates. We all do.

But a forced buyout of the state’s two major transmission and distribution companies guarantees years of turmoil and distraction. From transitioning the critical work done by the utilities to an untested governmental authority, to the certainty of protracted litigation, these delays will stall innovation, investment and Maine’s aggressive plan to move toward electrification of our energy system and carbon reduction.

I was proud to serve as the co-chair of Maine’s Economic Recovery Committee, which was tasked with helping chart a course for the state to successfully emerge from the damage caused by the pandemic.

Through an open, inclusive and bipartisan process, we developed a list of eight recommendations to sustain and grow Maine’s economy. Of those recommendations, three are directly at risk if a governmental takeover occurs: supporting renewable energy development; attracting new people and new investments to Maine; and improving the regulatory environment that delivers consumer protections and predictability for business.

Public power was the only major issue on which the committee could not reach consensus, despite strong advocacy by some members. This is a contentious and polarizing debate that absorbed a lot of energy in our committee and could do the same thing in our larger economic recovery.

Maine has taken important steps and set aggressive goals in the fight against climate change. In its “Maine Won’t Wait” climate action plan, the state has committed to reducing greenhouse gas emissions to 45 percent below 1990 levels by 2030, and to 80 percent below those levels by 2050.

That first benchmark is just nine years away. We cannot afford to waste that time fighting over utility ownership when instead we can get to work to deliver results for Maine people — together.

I recently joined the board of directors for Versant Power — one of the two companies targeted for takeover. I did this after carefully researching and considering the integrity and behavior of their owner, ENMAX. Since joining, I have seen their stewardship ethic shine through in our board work. We know that we have work to do to improve and we are proud of the progress we have made in just a short amount of time.

Versant is the first company to fully meet the requirements of Maine’s new public benefits law, which guarantees that utility transactions in the state are good for Mainers and not just company profits.

We are firmly committed to doing our part to support the growth of renewable energy in Maine, enabling more infrastructure for electric vehicles and engaging actively in the work to mitigate and adapt to climate change.

We are also committed to the Mainers who depend on us for electricity and to improving the service that we provide. First and foremost is our commitment to safety and reliability.

The desire for lower rates must be balanced against the need to invest in infrastructure that will improve reliability and allow for the expansion of renewable energy.

But those same pressures will exist regardless of ownership. They won’t go away just because politicians run the electric company instead of experienced operators. In fact, they are likely to get worse.

The next 10 years may be some of the most critical in Maine’s history as we progress toward a better energy future and a healthier climate. Based on my experience, the only chance to achieve the massive transition that the times demand is through a collaborative, balanced and thoughtful approach.

LD 1708 is not that.