BANGOR, Maine — In the past four months, Bangor police have been called to 190 Harlow St., home to Diamonds Gentleman’s Club and the Half Acre Nightclub, more than 50 times, raising the ire of area residents and city officials.
“That’s high, 50 calls is high,” Bangor interim Police Chief Peter Arno said Thursday morning. “It obviously puts some stress on our workforce.”
Tom Brann, landlord of the property, said Thursday afternoon that he was surprised to hear about the concerns and that he had received very little information from either police or residents about the complaints. That lack of communication needs to be addressed, he said.
One of Brann’s sons, Matt Brann, owner of the Half Acre, echoed his father’s call for improved communication and said the club would work with the city on the issues.
In the most recent incident on Wednesday night, Bangor police arrested Walker Gaspar, 24, of Deer Isle and charged him with felony aggravated assault in connection with a knife attack in the parking lot.
Earlier that night, the clubs came up during a meeting at which city councilors and city staff discussed goals and challenges facing Bangor for 2013. During discussion of increasing drug and crime problems in the city, Arno said police resources, especially in the early morning hours, have been tied up at 190 Harlow St.
“We have done our best to deal with issues such as loitering, public intoxication and disorderly conduct,” Arno said in a memo drafted Oct. 29 after a series of noise complaints from residents in the area. “On occasion, this has tied up significant police resources, keeping in mind that after [1:45 a.m.], we have only five or six officers working.”
For several weeks during the summer, police posted an extra officer near the property whose sole responsibility was to monitor activity in the area around closing time. That detail ended in mid-October, but night crew officers drive by the property when time permits to make their presence known.
The memo cites a pair of incidents in the last weekend of October. Early on the morning of Oct. 28, Bangor police Sgt. Robert Angelo broke up a fight after one woman punched another in the face after leaving the Half Acre, spurring a “melee.” The alleged aggressor was charged with assault. That same weekend, staff at Diamonds called police to ask that they clear patrons out of the Harlow Street parking lot, a job that required three officers, according to Arno.
A Brockton, Mass., man was arrested Oct. 12 at Diamonds after a bag of cocaine fell out of his pocket, police said. There have been other instances of noise complaints, disorderly conduct, tresspasses and public urination.
“Not captured in these 50 complaints would be similar calls to adjacent properties, such as Abbot Square, most likely caused by patrons of these two establishments,” Arno said.
When police need to respond to a fight or noise complaint where many people are gathered, multiple officers can be required at the scene, “essentially leaving the city kind of wide open,” Arno said.
“It’s individuals, not the businesses that are causing the problems,” Brann said, adding he didn’t think it was up to the businesses to monitor individuals’ behavior after they leave the building.
“Where does individual responsibility begin and the responsibility of the business end?” Brann said.
City Manager Cathy Conlow said Thursday morning that she hopes to meet with the owners of the businesses sometime next week to figure out how to address the complaints.
“We need to have this discussion with them,” Conlow said.
“I think that would be a fantastic idea,” Jimmy Ellis, spokesman for Arayos LLC, Diamonds’ ownership group, said late Thursday morning. Ellis said he doesn’t want residents in the area to be upset with the business and doesn’t want its patrons tying up the city’s already busy and limited police force.
Part of the problem, according to Ellis, is the fact that patrons have to be out of both clubs by 1:30 a.m., which can send up to 300 intoxicated people into the parking lot at once.
“I don’t think that’s safe,” Ellis said. “That’s not a healthy situation.”
One potential solution, Ellis said, could be allowing the business to stay open later, maybe 3 a.m., but continue to stop serving alcohol at 1 a.m. He said that sort of “soft close” would encourage people to stay later, while drinking water or energy drinks to “sober up,” and then filter out of the building more gradually — a dozen at time rather than hundreds at a time.
When a mass of largely intoxicated, noisy people leave the clubs all at once, it also breeds potential for aggression among patrons, according to Arno and Ellis.
Ellis said he would do “anything and everything” he could to help the city resolve the crime and noise issues at the Harlow Street property.
“We’ve always worked with the city any time we’ve had any issues,” Brann said.
He cited a spat in 2005 over noise coming from the former Club Gemini, which was located at 190 Harlow St. Residents complained nearly every Friday and Saturday night about noise coming from the club.
Some of the same residents who complained later credited the owners of Gemini and 190 Harlow St. for working to correct the problem, and calls to police about noise dwindled. That has become a “case study” in how to resolve concerns, Brann said, but property owners spent “a lot of money” to make that happen.
Arno said increased police presence isn’t likely to solve the problem on its own, and that collaboration by the city and the businesses will need to happen.
“We can put 100 policemen down there monitoring people as they leave, but once someone shouts or a fight breaks out it’s already too late,” Arno said. “You can’t put the scream back in their mouth.
“We’re not going to be able to arrest our way out of this problem,” the chief said.



Can’t be any worse than the stampedes on Black Friday! (For Walmart, really?)
Irrelevant.
Nope, not “irrelevant.” Both businesses cause taxpayer expense, and possible injury.
This is unacceptable. Any good club would rarely have to call the police. You hire good security and bouncers and you diffuse most situations before they become a problem. As a business you should not rely on the police to do your job. Hire more help and train them right.
I say we either run these dumps out of town or require them to hire security, and/or pay for police visits through fines. Also, the Landlord needs to become the first subject of the proposed lousy landlord ordinance.
I agree. While I don’t necessarily have a problem with the businesses themselves I do have a problem with the calling police and draining resources. Better business instinct would tell you if you are already running a controversial businesses your best bet is stay below the radar. You don’t open and right away become a burden to resources. Proper security and training would curb the calls by A LOT. Don’t let certain people in, follow people right out even in the parking lot, learn to intervene and deescalate situations that arise, and so on. OF COURSE it’s their problem what goes on in the parking lot ! I think I already see the biggest problem.
first off 50 calls in 4 monthes is 12 1/2 calls a month or 3.1 per weekend. So on the weekends put more cops on and the problem is solved.And after 4 monthes they should know the trouble makers from the non trouble makers so ban them from your club.
So all citizens should pay for increased police due to this one business?
No, they need to hire their own private security/bouncers to defuse these situations as much as possible so they don’t have to call the police. Maybe their bartenders should keep a better watch on how much they are serving these people. Alcohol seems to be the key player in these issues…
Are you willing, if you a Bangor resident, to incur higher taxes to support the increased police presence that you propose? I cannot imagine any citizens of Bangor would answer yes to that! This should be the business establishment’s burden, not the taxpayers of the city!! Why don’t the owners of these clubs hire private security and foot the bill?! And why are these establishments serving hundreds of patrons until they are visibly drunk???!
I’m sure the amount of taxes that Diamonds/ Half Acre pay more than covers the cost of a few hours of police work a week….. Financially speaking the State probably comes out ahead. I do however agree that it should not be up to the police to deal with these issues.
Wrong.
double wrong. the taxes also pay for fire protection roads and streets, and a host of other functions within the city limits.
Why should even one penny of my tax dollars go toward fixing this problem? Second, this has been going on for a very long time so I’m pretty sure the club employees and the owner know exactly who the troublemakers are. Tom Brann deserves to be hit hard in the wallet.
And the city should send them the bill for the cops’ overtime.
Get out your checkbook.
If the problems are ocurring in the parking lot then they obviously need good security out there and they should be making sure people are not hanging around there and if there too drunk to drive get cabs for them but dont let them hang around waiting for a fight.
Will someone please tell me why the landlord is to blame? Maybe in this case where the landlord’s son runs the clubs, but an unattached landlord, renting to a lawful business shouldn’t be responsible for how that business is run UNLESS he’s a stock-holder.
Because he clearly doesn’t have enough or good enough security. The cops should not be called 50 times. That’s ridiculous. Do any other establishments have the cops called 50 times?
Obviously you either didn’t read my post, or you do not understand English.
I understand English just fine. Did you not say “Maybe in this case where the landlord’s son runs the clubs…”
Why, yes you did.
Easy – he’s renting his property to bad tenants. He owns the place. He’s responsible for what happens there. The new ordinance that will be coming to town will eliminate the ability of lousy landlord to pretend that they are victims who have no control over what happens on their property.
Let me change the scenario a bit. Obama, owns the problems of America today because he’s in charge, right? Or is it still George Bush’s fault. I hope you’re never king someday.
We need Dalton!!!!
You don’t know how many times I thought that since reading this earlier, LOL. Sam Elliot is more my style though :-)
Well yah, he’s badass too, but look where he ended up! :)
I know :( But he looked darn good, even in those last moments !
i really thought he’d be bigger
A polar bear fell on me
Be nice……until it is time not to be nice.
God, I love that movie!!
That is one of those movies that when you are flipping through channels and you see it’s on, even though you just caught it last week the same way, you stop again and watch…I am such a sucker for that movie !
Let me give you a local”no thank you” Do you enjoy pain “pain don’t hurt”
And a good bartender doesn’t serve a visibly drunk person!
You are absolutely correct…Thanks for posting that.
The Hollywood Slots, do not have this problem!! Why? Answer is simple, the establishment is managed properly!! All bars should have mandatory alcohol testing meters!! Then again, there would be money lost on many levels! PRIORITIES!!
While I agree with Brann when he said “he didn’t think it was up to the businesses to monitor individuals’ behavior after they leave the building”, I think it would go a LONG way to gaining acceptance in Bangor if they did just that. What if the 2 businesses split the cost of a couple of people for ‘parking lot control’ for an hour or so at the end of the evening? Maybe their own doormen, or an outside company?
I’m afraid what you suggest cannot work. With the exception of the 8-10 parking lot in front of the strip club, all the remaining parking areas are public lands. Private security and bouncers have no legal power or right to order anyone to vacate or change behavior once the patron has left their property- if they see something illegal or dangerous they can only do what you and I can do as citizens- dial 911.
Nope, can’t be done. I was a bouncer for over 15 years and once the patrons were outside the building you had zero right to “watch, direct, or oversee them” in any way. You can be held liable both professionally and personally for doing so. The police in the city I worked were very helpful and cooperative. We worked closely with them to define boundaries and voice concerns. That’s where improvements need to be made. Proactive measures go a long way.
Please keep in mind that these businesses pay taxes too and have every right to call police if the situation warrants it. In the places I worked, there was intermittent police patrol anyway and that served as a deterrent to many of the trouble makers. However we also had 4 or 5 bouncers to defuse most situations. If we couldn’t, then we used force as necessary to remove the problem. All perfectly legal, but once outside you stopped, went back inside and dealt with individuals if they came back, in the most effective way including force and police intervention.
Please don’t forget that Bangor is a city (hard to believe for some) and this stuff happens all the time and is dealt with without fanfare, daily.
The clubs should do what Barnaby’s does, pay police officers part time to patrol the area.
Yup.
People in that area should pipe down and wait it out a month. Gemini shut down, divas shut down. Places don’t last in that area. The problem will go away all by itself.
City officials shouldn’t get too upset, they are the ones who approved the location!
Can you say OVERSERVING?
DRIVE THEM OUT OF TOWN!!!
London, England had similar problems because its pubs were required to close at 10PM. Maybe around 7 years ago they changed the laws to allow later closing times, and I think some could stay open 24 hours. The end result was you didn’t get hundreds of drunk people dumped on every street corner at 10PM and the resulting fights. Also they had problems with people drinking lots of drink in a short period of time because the bars closed so early (trying to fit a nights worth of drinking in one hour).
Okay,up to 300 drunks on the street at closing time,SOLUTION: LET THEM GET INTO THEIR CARS,START TO GO AND ARREST THEM FOR D.U.I! That happens for a week or 2 and PROBLEM solved! They will start to think twice. DOES THIS MAKE ANY SENCE?
What about all the other pubs in town. closing time 90% are over the limit arrest them.
I think you will see that they can’t do that . If i remember right they tried that 10 years ago an the state told the police they could not do that i forgot what it was called .
entrapment.
Honestly, no. A totalitarian state does not work. Having a night life in the downtown area of a city is essential to keeping young people here. If you park cruisers and pull over everybody, I’m sure that some will be over the limit, most will not. Everyone who drinks at all is at some level of intoxication. To punish the ones who drink responsibly and use desg. drivers is not a proper solution and certainly not economically feasible.
This problem can be solved with police and liquor enforcement sitting down with bar ownership, management and staff to put in place measures to curb the unruly behaviour and keep the over intoxication to an absolute minimum. Being proactive will yield big dividends.
The Bangor city council were happy the city was getting more bars. Now they are concerned? LOL.
Take out fountain in West Market Square for more public gatherings and bands, enticing more people who are drinking. Let West Market Square bars allow people to eat and drink out in square later into the night. Drinking at waterfront concerts. Drinking at Folk Festival. Gold Star Cleaners parking lot is a hub for gatherers and police. Heck, we don’t even go to the New Year’s Ball Drop anymore because of the drunk crowd and cigarette smoke. We’re not prudes and believe reasonable, responsible drinking is fine. But public drunkeness is in more locations than Harlow Street.
This is what happens when the City Council conciders Bangor as the entertainment corrodor..
Makes for entertaining reading!
IT IS AGAINST THE LAW TO SERVE A DRUNK PERSON ALCOHOL. Has any of the pubs/bars/ dives in downtown Bangor ever been sited for serving a drunk person???, I’m guessing the city isn’t doing their jobs.. Start at the seadog move to the ones near broad street and main street and from their spred out.. You charge the bar owners with serving drunks and the problem will end
We agree but it is a State license and the liquor regulations are the State”s. They have abdicated their responsibility for enforcing their regulations as I cited above. With only 5-6 officers on the streets, as stated in the article, how much time can be dedicated to liquor regulation enfforcement with everything else going on in town.
.
Sorry Red, it won’t. It is impossible to monitor in some cases several hundred people and gauge how drunk they are. You are right, it IS against the law to KNOWINGLY serve visibly drunk people. There is also the burden of proof to prove that someone did that. You can have the best of intentions to not let drunks be served, but inevitably sometimes they are. The best bet is to be proactive with local police and liquor enforcement to set goals and manage expectations. It worked great for us and I’m sure it can in Bangor too.
I’m sure you have known people who can hold their liquor VERY well. Where’s the customer’s personal resposibility, in addition to not serving those already intoxicated? It isn’t always that obvious.
You are 100 % correct. It is the bar’s responsibility not to serve an intoxicated person. Doing so subjects the bar to a fine and even loss of license. I bet if the State Liquor Enforcement were to visit either of the clubs some evening that they would be able to find intoxicated people being served, especially since Diamond’s spokesperson claims to be aware of 300 drunks leaving both of the clubs at closing time. I would bet that the threat of losing their license might go along way in curing the problem.
There are no longer “liquor inspectors” it is the responsibility of local law enforcement to act as such. So I’ve been told while working in the service industry for the past decade, longer
That is a great point, push. We read of undercover officers hanging around prostitutes to protect me and you from what, I don’t know, but we don’t read about undercovers looking for bars over serving alcohol, a very real danger to anyone within 20 feet of a sidewalk. Start putting some teeth into alcohol service laws and the bar owners will start training their servers, patrons will be served less alcohol, and the related problems will dwindle. Some bar owners want to shift responsibility, but serving alcohol is a serious responsibility and they should be required to be responsible about serving it.
“Part of the problem, according to Ellis, is the fact that patrons have to be out of both clubs by 1:30 a.m., which can send up to 300 intoxicated people into the parking lot at once.
“I don’t think that’s safe,” Ellis said. “That’s not a healthy situation.”
One potential solution, Ellis said, could be allowing the business to stay open later, maybe 3 a.m., but continue to stop serving alcohol at 1 a.m. He said that sort of “soft close” would encourage people to stay later, while drinking water or energy drinks to “sober up,” and then filter out of the building more gradually — a dozen at time rather than hundreds at a time.”
From the above excerpt, it’s clear to me that:
1 They are overserving past the point of intoxication
2 If they are that drunk at 1am, they will still be intoxicated at 3 when Bangor has even fewer Police on the streets
3The “soft close” being suggested has historically turned these type of places from “watering holes” to “drug dens” as the dealers see opportunity and judgement is already badly impaired by alcohol.
More generally, how many additional liquor licenses has the Council handed out in the downtown in the last 10 years. I venture the number has tripled and with the State having abdicated all liquor license enforcement to the local PD who are already stretched to the breaking point.
Finally, nothing good ever happens after midnight!
2 hours is plunty of time to sober up,so no they wouldn’t be as drunk.
Nope, it isn’t enough time.
Alot of people thought that Hollywood Slot would be the big problem. But you never here a word about crime, fights and PD spending anytime down there. Well maybe to deal a few cards. or play and enjoy the music. Close 190 Harlow Street down.
I agree. There are also many other bars downtown that dont have a problem. In fact there are really a lot more bars than most realize. Paddy’s, Nocturnum ( sp)…on and on, and funny as it is, even Judys doesnt get as many calls.
shut the place down..there is more going on here than you know..do you see any other clubs in the area having the same kind of problems..NO. Besides if I were a tax paer I know I would be there telling them what to do with the club
Never been to Barnaby’s have you?
I wonder what the number of police calls are to Barnaby’s? HIGHER probably bc a police officer is there at all times. Maybe these business’s should rent-a-cop too
300 intoxicated patrons leaving 2 establishments!!!!! Let me guess maybe 100+ patrons driving drunk on the streets of Bangor. Now That’s the REAL Problem!!!!
I see a complex of issues here. First the city forced the club to this area, it was not by choice. when the city dictates where some business needs to go to operate, they are usually without a clue, no traffic study, no environmental study, etc just because someone at the city thought it would be better. Noise complaints in a downtown area. yes that is what happens in a downtown area, no surprise here. If someone doesn’t like it, move to the suburbs or the country. 5 or 6 cops on duty at night when most of the action occurs ? I think this needs to be reviewed. When people only have one option, to sit around and look without moving around and dancing, then the buzz develops much more quickly and continues.
Maybe the city should hire some part-time constables, for some evenings. Just the sight usually quells most potential disturbances. For the most part, the Police do a good job with their resources but the city needs to allow the merger of business and climate and stay out of it. Had it been left alone it would be up on State St hill, out of the way. I remember the old French St bowling alley and its rowdy crowds but not many complaints were ever filed, if any. People accepted it because it was the city and a city is full of excitement, noise, sirens, etc. It is what attracts. Older folks should not move into a city if they don’t want the noise that is associated with a metro area.
What about younger folks… who it seems are now the ones doing the complaining. My I’m older, and when I’m in the city, and things get noisey, I just turn over and sleep on my good ear.
Management is the problem they allow fights and I know for a fact have covered up assaults for their favorite patrons….what a dump. Diamonds is a trash hole
agreed… we shouldn’t allow these type of businesses in Bangor
at 1:30 AM 300 drunks hitting the parking lots at the time !!! What is wrong with this picture.
How about a roadblock on Harlow Street to keep these drunks off the streets.
The very nature of the business attracts a certain kind of clientele. There may be issues with a lack of security, serving intoxicated individuals, etc., etc., but when it comes right down to it, shady people occupy shady places. The end. Yes, I agree that this establishment most definitely needs Dalton. :)
I kinda liked Brad Wesley.
Seems to me that Bangor officials made their bed by allowing these business’s in the city so sleep in it –and stop your whining ! Besides the drunks are in a specific area this way , and not spread out all over the city.
I just wish it wasn’t at the foot of a residential area
Unless you live at the School House Apartments or over on Court Street you have not idea how bad this situaton is on some nights….People screaming, yelling every foul word one can think of. Working people need their sleep. I am glad the police are taking a proactive approach to this…
Yeah they are actually doing something for once
Who sets the stupid 1am cut off anyway? That’s the root cause. Change it to 2am with a 1 hour soft close and the “1:30” melee would dissapear.
“Soft Closes” sound great in theory, but NO establishment wants to do it. There is NO $ in serving water and soda at 1 am. Nor does anyone that has just cleaned up a kitchen at say 10 pm want to deal with firing the kitchen back up.
Also I agree to an extent with the poster that said after hour bars turn into “drug dens”. I wouldn’t probably use that term, but I saw first hand what went on in one particular after hours club and it was SO busy practically anything went there.
In Tulsa Oklahoma, when an establishment with a liquor license has a number of criminal infractions on their premisis, they are required to hire a off-duty police officer to patrol their establishment, during the hours they are open. IF the officer discovers that the enviornment is attracting the criminal element, or is somehow involved in criminal activity, the license to operate is suspended and the owners must show cause to have their license reinstated.
Bangor needs to get tough or risk becoming similar to Tulsa in the Seventies. Trust me, NO ONE wants that.
Bring back the red light district and let them at it.
“We have done our best to deal with issues such as loitering” really does occupy bangor ring a bell to anyone how short our memories are.
There use to be a lot of good places to have a good time in Bangor Brewer, now there are just a couple to a few, so now it is concerted to one area, makes it easier to round up I guess.
Hats off to the Bangor PD. Your job is not an easy one.If its not this its dealing with all those salted transient zombies down on Hammond st.Thanks for all you do!
I feel bad for the silly stuff they have to deal with.. we need more divisions
They are trying to get them so drunk that they spend all of their money on the girls. Obviously.
“Part of the problem, according to Ellis, is the fact that patrons have
to be out of both clubs by 1:30 a.m., which can send up to 300
intoxicated people into the parking lot at once.”
Mr. Ellis, no one should not be serving patrons until they are intoxicated so this may be a good place to start. If it requires being intoxicated to watch some of the exotic dancers maybe it’s time to improve the view.
I been all around the world and I gotta tell you, the soft close idea is one of the best working solutions for any nightclub, tavern, or bar. Cutting off the booze and yet continuing to serve food and non-alcoholic drinks is a winner of an idea… Turning all of them loose at once isn’t.
hope it all works out…. Bangor needs a night life
I could not agree more with Sam278. Those are my thoughts exactly, if they had good bouncers then these types of things would never happen. It’s time they hire some decent bouncers and clean the place up before it is shut down.
How does Harlow Street police calls compare to Odlin Road police calls? (Ramada Inn) Perhaps downtown Bangor needs an all night doughnut shop.