Maine, the latest state to allow charter schools, is wrestling with familiar questions about how those schools can co-exist with regular public districts — and how to manage the growth of the independent school sector to meet demand across the mostly rural state.

State lawmakers and Republican Gov. Paul LePage last year approved legislation that paves the way for cautious charter school expansion, allowing just 10 state-approved schools to open over the next decade. No such limits were placed on local school boards approving charters.

Two charter schools have been approved and opened so far, with two others having been given conditional approval and eight others under consideration. The relatively strong interest has led some supporters of the original law, including state education Commissioner Stephen Bowen, to say the state should already consider lifting the cap.

Questions about whether the state is moving too slowly or too quickly surfaced earlier this year, when LePage accused members of the state’s newly formed charter school commission of dragging their feet in reviewing applications for virtual schools.

But Jana Lapoint, the chairwoman of the commission, said members of the panel were wary of repeating the mistakes of other states that allowed poorly conceived charters, including virtual schools, to open, only to see them founder later.

“We’re really holding their feet to the fire before they open,” Lapoint said in an interview. “We’re asking a lot. We don’t want to close a school in two years, or in five years.”

Maine was the 41st state in the country to approve charters for a reason, Lapoint added. Many residents and policymakers remain skeptical of the movement. Backers of charters — Lapoint is one of them — should favor having state officials take a methodical approach to judging new schools, she said.

“There are many people out there ready to throw darts at us as a commission if anything goes wrong,” she said.

Logjam broken

Efforts to establish charter schools in Maine failed to gain political traction until last year, the first session that followed the GOP taking control of both chambers of the State House in Augusta the previous election. The charter schools law was approved with strong Republican backing.

The law established a seven-person charter school commission. Three of its members also serve on the state board of education, and those three members nominate four others from the public to the panel. The commission drew the governor’s wrath earlier this year when it voted to delay consideration of virtual charter schools, after citing problems with financial and academic oversight of those online programs in other states and calling for more time to evaluate the schools’ merits.

LePage, in a strongly worded June letter, argued that virtual education had shown results in other states and was already being used by many Maine students, particularly homeschoolers.

“If any members of the commission are not up to meeting the state’s expectations, I urge their resignation,” wrote LePage, who added: “Your work is critical to many students, so I strongly encourage you to complete your work promptly.”

But the commission was unmoved. Lapoint noted that Maine’s charter school law forbids for-profit companies from operating charter schools, though nonprofits can contract with for-profits to provide education or management services. But Lapoint said the commission feared that the governing boards of the proposed virtual charters would not act independently of the for-profit companies they hired to help them.

The eight pending proposals before the commission include a pitch to create the Maine Virtual Academy, which would contract with K12 Inc., a major, nationwide for-profit company based in Herndon, Va., to provide management and other services. (K12 spokesman Jeff Kwitowski said in an email that the company respects school boards’ “independence and autonomy” and expects them to “establish the policies and direction” of the school.)

The two charter schools approved by the commission so far serve very different populations. The Cornville Regional Charter School, located in a rural community in the central part of the state, is an elementary school that emphasizes personalized learning, physical activity and schoolwide projects. It opened on the site of a traditional public school that closed a few years before. Students have come from six different districts, some as far as 20 miles away, said Justin Belanger, the school’s executive director.

“We wanted to focus on what works in education,” Belanger said. “We made a bigger and better school. We’re doing more than just replacing the old school.”

Boosting motivation

The other charter school, the Maine Academy of Natural Sciences, in Hinckley, seeks to appeal to students who have not been motivated by their academic experiences in traditional school settings. The school’s curriculum emphasizes project-based learning across science and agriculture.

The academy serves 47 students who come from 27 school districts around Maine, the majority of whom live on the school’s campus during the week, said Glenn Cummings, the school’s president. Cummings is a former Democratic speaker of the house in Maine who also served in the Obama administration as deputy assistant secretary in the U.S. Department of Education.

Olivia Broadrick, 17, left a high school in her hometown of York, two hours away, to attend the academy. She now drives to and from her new school at the beginning and end of each week.

The teenager, who is considering studying forestry or wildlife rehabilitation in college, has taken on projects such as building a chicken coop on campus, which included an incubator, with the help of a carpenter and an AmeriCorps volunteer. She says she integrated her work on the project into her science and English classes.

“I adored my old school,” Broadrick explained. “It’s nothing negative about it. There’s just something inspiring here.”

Funding concerns

Maine charter schools are funded based on the number of students they serve. Even at this early stage, some districts are reporting substantial losses of funding as students leave their systems for charters.

The Regional School Unit 54 has lost 50 students to the state’s two approved charter schools, most of them to the Cornville school, said Brent Colbry, the superintendent of the 2,800-student district, which has a budget of about $31 million.

Those outward migrations have cost the school system about $430,000, said Colbry. Most district expenses have not fallen, he said, and so the school is trying to cut costs in other ways, such as by imposing a spending freeze and leaving job openings in teaching and other areas unfilled.

“We’ve tried to be good soldiers,” said Colbry, who has been working in public schools for nearly 40 years. The passage of the charter law, he said, is “clearly one of the most dramatic things to ever happen to education in Maine.”

The state’s education commissioner, Bowen, said the law has the potential to benefit students across the state by offering them specialized academic services and other attributes. He said traditional public schools’ losses of students and funding reflected families’ desire to seek a better option.

“If the instant you give students a choice, they pack up and leave the school, … I don’t know if the presence of a charter school is the biggest problem,” Bowen said. “Somehow, [the charter] is doing something different.”

Given that the number of charters under review by the commission would put the state at its cap, Bowen said he is likely to ask legislators to consider lifting it. The 10-school limit was a “number pulled out of the air,” Bowen said. “There’s nothing magical about it.”

Others are skeptical of ramping up charter school growth so soon. State Sen. Justin Alfond, a Democrat who opposed the law, questioned whether charters that attempt to open in more rural parts of the state will be sustainable, given the limited number of students available for recruitment.

“We have two charters that have opened in Maine,” Alfond said. “The state needs to slow down and start watching how well these charters are doing before we start expanding.”

Distributed by MCT Information Services

Join the Conversation

21 Comments

  1. K-12 inc was a large  contributor  to Maine republican in the 2010 election  via the R party as was an out of state organization for privatiizing the prisons. It gave me a clue on what the future agenda would be .

    1. For the 2012 election, less than half of K-12 contributions go to Democrats.

      REED & REED and WRIGHT EXPRESS gave a combined $6,000 in the 2010 election to ACT BLUE in earmarked contributions. Can you tell us what they got for their earmarks? 

  2. Every school should be a charter school…Research shows that the achievement of students in charter schools is not any better than the performance of students in regular schools. Dump the charter schools; we have enough elitism in this country.

    1. Facts have no place in a discussion about school reform.  All that matters is that teachers have it too good what with their unions and everything.

        1.  How do I know that facts have no place in educational reform?  Pretty simple, because none of the things that educational reformers propose to do have any research to back them up.  In fact, most of the research points to their policies and ideas having a negative effect on schools and children.  Charter schools harm kids twice as often as they help them.  Merit pay doesn’t work.  Educational reformers and politicians have been dictating school policy for the past 29 years.  It is time to allow actual educators a chance to improve our schools.

          1. I find it interesting that facts don’t count.  Give me links to the research you claim. Give me the links to show that teachers “have it too good”.  What is too good?  You make a lot of claims with nothing at all to back it up.

          2. I feel that K12 with over 250,000 students enrolled and fully accredited may be superior to Maine’s public schools. I have a friend who teaches college students in web based courses and finds the work load daunting, with far more constant interaction with students and work that in previous classrooms. Student interaction time increases dramatically; and they work harder to master content since the competition is obvious to all. 

            This may be the true picture of virtual schools that the MEA doesn’t want you to hear about:

            “Garden State Virtual Charter is looking to to open next year with 36 teachers and 1,000 students in K-12. Jason Flynn, lead founder of the Garden State Virtual Charter, said that documenting attendance shouldn’t be a problem as teachers will be keeping an eye on students through two-way secured Web conferencing.
            “There is constant interaction,” he said.“It’s not like kids get e-mailed 30 sheets on Monday and submit them next Monday.”

          3. Maneiac, it was sarcasm pure and simple.  That should have been evident by my statements that Charter schools don’t work nor do merit pay the two ideas pushed by educational reformers.  Virtual charter schools are an absolute disaster for student achievement.  All of this can be found in the following places:  http://www2.ed.gov/rschstat/eval/choice/pcsp-final/execsum.html
            http://nepc.colorado.edu/publication/understanding-improving-virtual
            http://www.washingtonpost.com/blogs/answer-sheet/post/ravitch-why-merit-pay-for-teachers-doesnt-work/2011/03/29/AFn5w9yB_blog.html   Any advocate for Charter schools either does not care about Children or isn’t intelligent enough to do the basic research to find out that they hurt children. 

        1. Gopher, I appologize if my sarcasm did not come through.  Maine teachers are among the lowest paid in the country and our results are among the highest.  This despite a tough rural demographic heavy on poverty, and low on educational aspiration.   Why go to college when you can just become a fisherman or a welder?  Why bother studying in school at all?  At least this seems to be our Governor’s philosophy.

  3. Now here’s a surprise, why do you suppose the Republican/Tea Party wants to take control of public tax dollars and give them away to poltical supporters who also happen to be businesses that profit off selling educational programs and materials?  Hmm…I just can’t figure this one out.  Who’s gonna end up paying for the tax dollars pulled from local systems to support charters?  I’m guess that would be us folks who actually pay more than 14% in taxes each year.

    1. Check the law. the money follows the child; it is no longer exclusively the local government schools to spend. 

      Doesn’t the Democratic party recieve tons of money from their political supporters in the teachers’ union; who reward them with billions of dollars of campaign support? Labor union cronyism has corrupted many a small and large government….just check the out of state contributors to groups like ACTBLUE—which is headquartered in Cambridge, Mass.!

  4. I think what has to happpen as far as the  loss of funds is that they have to start cutting back to cover for those losses.  Every dollar is tied to a part of the education process so they need to start looking at the budget more closely so when they report to the state for the eps next fall they will also loose their state funds.  50 students equates to about three classro0ms using 16 per class.  You shut down three rooms release 3 teachers one bus and so on.  When you are all done with that let us know when you will be bankrupt.

  5. That they “drew the governor’s wrath” is a sure sign that they are doing something right.

    LePage cares a little bit about education.  He cares a lot more about opening the door to privatize and profitize OUR schools.

  6. LePage and Bowen are out to lunch when it comes to what will benefit Maine kids. The educational “reforms” that they have pushed on the state are bullet items on the ALEC agenda. The purpose of the ALEC agenda is to destroy public education and enhance the ability of profiteers to tap into our tax dollars for education. Be very, very careful. These Tea hacks in Augusta have no love for anything but the almighty dollar.

    1. Do you have any proof that this so-called “ALEC agenda” when implemented in other states has failed to reform the traditional public schools and increase their performance? Many states which both implement the NCLB and ALEC ‘agenda’ have leaped ahead of Maine when it comes to cost-effective school reform.

      Without facts your spam goes rancid fast.

  7. Just suppose that the funded charter school doesn’t live up to the details in the hundreds of pages in their approved contract? grant?, then what’s the Commission going to do?

    Defund them; spend tens of thousands of dollars evaluating the school to ‘see what’s wrong’ and even more money on recommending changes, like removing staff, etc.

    Or as is typical in the failure of education ventures; spend MORE money on the school to remedy the shortcomings. Failure in educational reforms is nearly always rewarded with more money to ‘fix’ things. 

    Does the Commission have the staff or funding to determine how well the school is living up to the ‘blueprint’ agreed upon?  Right now they don’t; nor do they have the expertise to objectively evaluate a charter school…and this is the problem with these lengthy documents; everything sounds hunky dory, until the complaints and even lawsuits come in, and until key staff are replaced with people who don’t want to adhere to the agreement.    

    Is the Attorney General’s office going to become a compliance office for the Commission or are they going to staff upfor one?  What is the role of OPEGA in compliance? 

  8. Looks like the commission is doing the job that they were commissioned to do.  let’s hope they can keep it up, in spite of more lousy supervision and poor management by LePage and Bowen.

Leave a comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *