Few things in nature are as terrifying as a prolonged drought. Rain is life-giving, a sign of God’s grace, but drought puts life to the test with a slow, consuming fire.
Hence the blazing sun and a deserted town at high noon symbolize a time of trial, a final crisis when an honest man stands alone against the heat.
The heat is increasing for those opposed to the normalization of homosexuality. Fewer and fewer people are willing to speak out against a movement which has the power to silence its opponents.
Many leaders of the pro-family movement carefully avoid any discussion of the morality of homosexuality. Instead they prefer subtle sociological, psychological and legal arguments in support of traditional marriage. They do so not because these arguments are effective, but because they fear being called haters.
Their unwillingness to confront the homosexual rights movement gives the final measure of credibility to the canard that “opposition to sodomy is bigotry.”
These leaders err greatly by hiding God’s message on homosexuality. Not only do they bring discredit on those who are faithful to God’s word, they also put themselves in jeopardy.
One new tactic used by the homosexual community is to silence free speech. One pro-family leader, Brian Camenker of Mass Resistance, is being sued for defamation of character for publishing a letter revealing the alleged activities of a homosexual youth organization in Maine. The plaintiff is a registered sex offender in Maine. Camenker, a man with limited means, is faced with losing his website and his livelihood as well.
Another pro-family website, Americans for Truth about Homosexuality, has been warned that if it continues to publish the same material, it too will be sued for defamation of character and its Web hosting service will be forced to take the website off the Internet.
Similarly, Dr. Scott Lively, another leading figure in the pro-family movement, is being sued in Federal District Court by an organization called “The Sexual Minorities of Uganda” in what can only be characterized as a frivolous lawsuit and an assault on the First Amendment.
These three examples prove that the power of the homosexual rights movement is now so vast and so reckless as to pose a threat to free speech.
Although the proposed referendum question exempts the clergy from performing same-sex marriages, this will quickly change. If and when the homosexual rights movement triumphs, any opposition to homosexuality will quickly become a criminal offense as it is now a criminal offense in Canada and England and other countries in Europe. This includes any statement from the pulpit that homosexual acts are sinful. Reading Leviticus aloud in public will then constitute a crime.
A movement powerful enough to support a foreign organization in their attempt to suppress the free speech of an American minister can easily silence any pastor, teacher, public official or ordinary citizen who dares say that homosexuality is wrong.
For the leaders of the pro-family movement to use the same message as their opponents — that marriage is good — and that the morality of same-sex marriage is not an issue, is more than a plan for failure. It is active collaboration with those who claim that truth-telling is bigotry and the Bible is hate speech.
When free speech is forbidden, that is precisely the time when one is most obligated to speak out. If neighbors cower in silence, that obligation grows heavier. Kneeling in the dirt and begging for forgiveness will not work, because as every confrontation with evil teaches, appeasement is no solution.
After the town has fled, leaving the doors barred and the street deserted, a few will remain to confront an absurdity which can only yield barrenness and sterility.
Homosexual marriage is after all, the final swing of the scythe which cuts an already blighted society to the ground.
Michael S. Heath is president and CEO of the No Special Rights PAC and served as executive director of the Christian Civic League of Maine from 1994 to 2009.



What kind of tenuous trash argument is this? Because gay people have equal rights they will suddenly be able to eradicate one of the most important aspects of our Constitution? Come on. You’re being ridiculous.
Leaders of the anti-gay marriage movement avoid the morality discussion because the smart ones (I’m not sure this author is) realize that the Supreme Court doesn’t uphold laws based upon mere moral disapproval. The lowest test for a law is “rational basis” and the SJC has found time and time again that moral disapproval doesn’t cut the mustard. That’s why they prop up these phony procreation and homosexuality is a choice arguments — they’re trying to get around the rational basis test.
“The heat is increasing for those opposed to the normalization of homosexuality.”
Therein lies Heath’s problem. This isn’t about some hidden “agenda” to convert heterosexuals to homosexuals.
Let’s be clear about something: homosexuality is abnormal, but it is natural, just as schizophrenia or testicular cancer is abnormal, but natural. (Of course, just because a trait or human property is abnormal does not make it a disease. Einstein was a genius in physics; he was abnormally intelligent in the field. But you wouldn’t say that his genius was a disease.)
Further, anyone can file a lawsuit for defamation. Free speech is being attacked every day, and not just in matters involving sexuality.
Wow, he’ll be a guest on Glenn Beck soon.
I am opposed to all civil marriages and the benefits bestowed on people who “choose” to marry. My argument against marriage benefits have been outlined here many times.
BUT MIKE, Leviticus? Who cares what Leviticus (a cabal of bronze-age conservative rabbis) says. Do you make your Saturday sacrifice as outlined in the same (out-dated) scroll?
Most of the population of Maine hails from Yankee stock. Yankees have traditionally believed in freedom. We have in recent years modified and restricted that freedom plenty, we do not need more restrictions. I sure do not follow any homosexual agenda but, frankly, I don’t give a rat’s behind what my neighbors are doing behind closed doors. Actually I probably wouldn’t care if they did it on their front lawn. Now my front lawn is a different story. That is mine and I get to make most of the rules here as long as I keep my tax bill paid. See how that works in Yankee-land? I don’t interfere with my neighbors, and they leave me alone. It is a time-tested way to run a society, and it works pretty well.
Now lets get on to the subject of morality. In this area (because we live in a place that values liberty) I get to have a different view from yours. The constitution makes it quite clear that I can not impeded your first amendment rights. Yeah court is expensive…. tough…. If something is worth fighting for, one should spare no expense. Groups you have headed in the past seem to have no trouble raising funds to advocate limiting the freedom of those who believe differently from you. Here’s an idea, why don’t you spend some of that money on your downtrodden friends?
Mike your act is played. The time of your influence is passing. Your tune is sour and steeped in the witch-hunting ancient past of Salem. The word “reactionary” comes to mind.
I feel sorry for you.
Not that I had any respect for “Mike’s” opinion anyway, but after reading his hate-filled rant about Barney Frank and sodomy that appeared in my inbox the other day, it just reminded me what an awful person this man is.
Mike Heath, your prejudice (I could use a harsher term) is showing again. Slickly written attempt at covering you paranoia. As for some of those suits, if the statements were factual, there would not be much a problem. However, facts are far from your strong suit. In fact, they’re totally absent. This piece is so slick that it can’t be really called a rant, but the effect is the same.
I totally respect and defend the right to free speech. I think this writer should speak louder and louder so everyone can hear his trash talk for what it is: trash. So sad for this man. Although he is “president and CEO of the No Special Rights PAC “, I would bet 100 bucks that he does not believe that applies to christians.
Mike needs to calm down. This is not Canada, or England, or a part of Europe. Same sex marriage has been legal in Mass for years, and no one has forced a church to marry anyone it doesn’t want to, nor have any priests been arrested for speaking against anything.
Also, while we have the right to free speech, that doesn’t mean it comes without consequences. You lie about someone, you’re likely to be sued for defamation.
Mike needs to calm down. This is not Canada, or England, or a part of Europe. Same sex marriage has been legal in Mass for years, and no one has forced a church to marry anyone it doesn’t want to, nor have any priests been arrested for speaking against anything.
Also, while we have the right to free speech, that doesn’t mean it comes without consequences. You lie about someone, you’re likely to be sued for defamation.
Not one comment of support for this irrelevant, trash talking “christian”. Mike, perhaps it is finally time to take the hint from your friends at the CCL and just quietly fade away…but oh wait, you need an income to support your family….better get some $$ coming into the No Special Rights PAC so that you can pay your bills.
I want him to continue on! Spread the word! Send out those emails and publish those opinions! The more Mainers read it the more they’ll want to distance themselves from it.
This poor sad man. I can only wonder why he is so obsessed.
The examples he gives are all false. Perhaps he believes why he writes. In which case it’s even more pathetic.
Marriage equality affects no one who isn’t getting married or who is already married, like me. There is no problem apart from the fantasies that seem to plague Mr Heath.
You should join his email list. This is nothing compared to that nonsense he sends out sporadically.