Experts say a child’s ability to read by the third or fourth grade — or not — is one of the strongest early indicators there is about his likelihood for success or failure in school and later in life.

Maine is on par with most other states in terms of fourth-grade reading ability, but the state once was among the best in the country. Worse, far less than half the state and nation’s fourth-graders are considered proficient in reading, as measured by a top test. That’s causing concern among education and economic officials.

“Anybody in teaching knows that by third grade you pretty much know what the outcome’s going to be,” said Dr. J.E. Stone, president of an organization called the Education Consumers Foundation in Arlington, Va., highlighting why Maine’s flat fourth-grade reading scores for almost 20 years are increasingly being cited as a top priority for improvement.

In 1994, about 41 percent of Maine’s fourth-graders were reading at grade level or above, according to results from the National Assessment of Education Progress, a test that measures students in a variety of subjects. That was 13 percentage points above the national average of 28 percent. Maine’s scores were the highest in the nation.

Today that gap is gone.

In 2011, after years of flat scores for Maine and improving ones in other states, Maine’s fourth-grade reading proficiency rate, according to NAEP, is 32 percent — dead even with the national average.

For this reason, the Maine Development Foundation gave the state a red flag for reading proficiency this year in its annual Measures of Growth report. The foundation set a benchmark of 50 percent of Maine students reaching reading proficiency by 2015. Instead, the state’s scores moved in the opposite direction.

“This is a predictor of future student success and public costs as well as a measure of the effectiveness of previous investments [in education]. … Ultimately, positive movement on many other economic indicators starts with kids having the tools to become productive members of society,” the foundation said in its report.

Maine Department of Education Commissioner Steve Bowen agrees and has made improving elementary reading proficiency one of the central goals of his administration.

“Maine has continued to show no progress in reading for far too many years,” Bowen said last November. “There is compelling scientific research about how kids learn to read, but we are not applying those methods universally.”

NAEP and reading are only one measure of Maine’s students, and the state does better according to other tests. The New England Common Assessment Program, which Maine participates in with the other New England states, shows that 68 percent of Maine students have reading proficiency by the beginning of their fifth-grade year — which, because of the test’s timing in the fall, reflects mostly on a student’s abilities at the end of fourth grade.

Maine’s fourth-grade NAEP math scores have risen since 1992, but not as quickly as the national average, although Maine remains above the national average.

Asked Friday what led to Maine’s stagnation, Bowen, who has been Maine’s top education official for about a year, said he prefers to focus on the future rather than the past.

“I think it’s pretty hard to say,” he said. “I don’t know that we want to spend a lot of time backing up and saying what we should have been doing. Our goal now is to make sure we’ve got good policies in place. There is a renewed interest.”

Among the initiatives by the department are working with higher-education institutions to develop better training for teachers and the development of an all-ages statewide literacy plan, which Bowen said will be released in the coming months.

Bowen said some of the most impressive progress is happening at the local level in terms of identifying students’ weaknesses and addressing them early, as well as encouraging and supporting their strengths whenever possible.

“What we’re seeing is districts, frankly without a whole lot of guidance from us, moving in that direction of letting kids move at their own pace,” said Bowen, a former middle and high school teacher. “We just think it’s a promising approach that’s moving us away from this sort of industrial era of educating our children.”

Promising approaches

West Bath School, located in rural Maine between the larger communities of Bath and Brunswick, boasted an 88 percent fourth-grade reading proficiency rate according to 2010 NECAP results — compared to a statewide average that year of 67 percent.

The school has high reading proficiency despite a free- and reduced-price lunch rate of about 55 percent, which is a poverty indicator that data shows correlates strongly with literacy levels, according to principal Emily Thompson.

A recent classroom visit offered a ready example of what Bowen means by “letting kids move at their own pace.” For those who fear it means embracing mediocrity, two West Bath students discussing the book “Harry Potter and the Order of the Phoenix” should give pause.

The book looked comically large and dauntingly thick in 7-year-old Autumn Nickerson’s hands.

“Wow! How many pages?” a reporter asked.

“Eight hundred something!” said Nickerson, sitting in a reading area at the school where she and her classmates were scattered on cushions and against walls, reading or working one-on-one with their teacher, Ida Beal.

“It’s a long book but it’s worth it,” said Audrey Crews, 8, sitting next to Nickerson with another Harry Potter book in hand. Crews turned to her friend. “It’s better if you read the first books in the series first. It makes more sense.”

Nickerson isn’t the first child to read Harry Potter books, which have sold something on the order of half a billion copies worldwide. But among all those readers, Nickerson might be among the youngest. She’s in second grade.

Money isn’t the problem

While the Maine Development Foundation cited poverty as a possible reason for the drop in scores, a lack of education money is not the problem. Maine spends more on K-12 education — on a per-pupil basis — than most other states.

During the 2010-11 school year, Maine’s K-12 per student expenditures were the eighth highest in the country — at $15,032, according to an annual data summary from the National Education Association. That spending was more than a third higher than the national average of $10,770.

Based on personal income, Maine’s spending ranked fourth in the country in 2009, according to the NEA, the nation’s teachers union, but the state is not spending that money on teacher pay. Maine ranked 36th for teacher salaries in 2010-11, the NEA report shows. Maine’s average teacher salary was $47,182; the national average was $55,623.

However, with declining enrollments, Maine has far more teachers than the national average. The state had the second-lowest student-to teacher-ratio — 10.9 — in the nation in 2010. Only Vermont was lower at 9.6. The national average was 15.6.

Lance Dutson, executive director of the Maine Heritage Policy Center, a conservative organization that has published several studies on education issues over the years — many of them compiled by Bowen prior to his becoming education commissioner — said these trends show that the solution for better education outcomes isn’t more money.

“The thing we’re concerned with is how to put some pressure on the system to break through to the next level,” said Dutson. “These are the same issues states all over the country are grasping. We’ve sort of worn out the idea that additional funding increases quality or moves people in these statistical rankings.”

Early intervention is key

If success isn’t about school spending, that leaves what happens between teachers and students as the key factor in reading and other subjects.

One of the major factors contributing to early reading success at West Bath School — other than what Thompson called an exceptionally strong group of teachers at the school — is a local assessment program that’s designed to flag students’ learning challenges early and intervene where necessary. One such program is a system developed by the Northwest Evaluation Association, which monitors student progress throughout the school year.

There also are other formal and informal efforts ranging from one-on-one and small-group work with students to teachers comparing notes outside the school day. It helps that West Bath School houses kindergarten through fifth grade, which Thompson said leads to a detailed and long-term understanding by teachers about each student’s strengths and weaknesses. The school’s library, which has a vibrant, student-friendly website, is also clearly integrated with classroom activities.

“There’s no falling through the cracks here,” said Thompson. “Intervention happens when it needs to happen. This assessment tool allows us to focus our resources where they’re needed.”

The concept of assessment and intervention with individual students who need help is not unique to West Bath School. Some schools have been developing local models for years, which is a process Bowen and the Department of Education are promoting vigorously.

The Bangor School Department, whose elementary schools boast some of the highest fourth-grade NECAP reading scores in Maine despite a 50 percent free- and reduced-lunch rate, has had an aggressive program in place since the 1990s. It includes assessment of every student’s achievement of certain benchmarks on a nearly constant basis as well as training for teachers on interpreting and acting on the data.

“Students are all over the spectrum,” said Superintendent Betsy Webb. “You have to listen to them individually read to understand how fluent they are and it takes teachers having a full bag of tools and knowing how to meet individual needs while moving the whole group. People are correct that test scores should not be the only measure of success but it certainly has to be one of them. Bangor has developed a thoughtful approach of how to use data and I couldn’t be prouder of our students and teachers.”

Stone, at the Education Consumers Foundation, which bills itself as an unbiased source for education data, said schools in most states are woefully inadequate when it comes to assessing students years before they take standardized tests in the third or fourth grade.

“We urge schools to focus more on what’s going on in those early grades,” said Stone. “In Maine and virtually every other state, they barely collect data on those early grades. By the time they take the NAEP test, that’s either four or five years of schooling that’s gone by already, depending on whether the student started in kindergarten or prekindergarten.”

Ryan Neale, a program manager for the Maine Development Foundation, which identified Maine’s fourth-grade reading scores as a problem spot in the state’s future, said that aiming more of the state’s resources at early childhood education is crucial for the state’s future economic prosperity.

“A lot of the data we’ve been seeing lately indicates that investments in early childhood development generates the best bang for the buck,” he said. “The returns are just better if you can build a solid foundation.”

Christopher Cousins has worked as a journalist in Maine for more than 15 years and covered state government for numerous media organizations before joining the Bangor Daily News in 2009.

Join the Conversation

299 Comments

  1. When social and Marxists illiterates are consistently elected to public office, is it any wonder why discipline, hard work and the desire to stimulate thought are no longer viewed as the critical factors in a child’s educational quiver.

    1. When conservative illiterates are consistently elected to public office, is it any wonder why discipline, hard work and the desire to stimulate thought are no longer viewed as the critical factors in a child’s educational quiver. 

      1. Before you stick with that misguided notion, you might want to take a look at which political party has been in power for the last forty years.

          1.  I’m sure the Maine Dems would like you to believe that it has nothing to do with politics.

          2. There are two things here, and I’m afraid many people are confusing the two:

            1. In Maine, money and test results don’t seem to coincide.
            2. In Maine, reading scores seem to be declining from a (maybe unsustainable blip in the cherry-picked year of 1994) national high 18 years ago, especially compared to the increases made nationally.

            Number 1 can be political, I suppose, since politicians give money to schools (although this isn’t anywhere near the 55% asserted by law in the essential programs and services from 2005).  But number 2 isn’t political at all.

            And I’d wager to say that number 2, why our scores are dropping, is by far the more important issue.  You may disagree, however.

          3. It has not one thing to do with what party is in control.  It has to do with stupid, barely literate parents.  Your parents are stupid and don’t read?  you will follow right in their footsteps.  Maine has many stupid parents.

          4. This is a societal issue. Media and media devices along with a few important social services like public schools/teachers have largely taken over or been handed most of the responsibilities of raising our children. Sure some will disagree with this statement but that’s because they may actually be parenting. Anyone involved in raising the children neglected by the majority of parents today probably understands and agrees with what I’m saying.

            However, I’m not sure that it’s fair to say it’s due to “stupidity” of parents. Even smart parents these days seem to ignore their children and would just as soon allow others to raise them. Unfortunately “outsiders” face an uphill battle in teaching children things such as morals, ethics, self-pride, and aspirations. Those things need to come from home 1st then be reinforced elsewhere. There just seems to be an awful lot of parents today who don’t confront their children in any way. Thus leading to another generation of behavioral and emotional misfits who will never be prepared for the responsibilities of holding down a job.

          5. I grew up reading the NRA and TRUE magazine and the local newspaper…and now I have a Ph.D. and publications. ….fortunately my Mom was pretty smart and I was helped by my biology teacher to get into a top rated engineering college. 

          6.  It shouldn’t be politicized.  There are those among us who can’t contribute anything meaningful so they go down the blame road.  Birth to three is one critical factor for school success.  Don’t agree- look at Finland- totally subsidized child care.

          7. Clearly from posts I see all over the US.  Our society does not respect or value teachers.  Very sad.

          8. The union has transformed them from professionals who were once concerned with the quality of their teaching and the final results; into highly paid school factory workers whose every minute is proscribed and valued in a long union contract. 

            Around here they got two periods a day for ‘research’ and class prep. Not enough? 

          9.  Just that women have more choices than the secretary,teacher,typist or nun that were available years ago.Also,with the sex scandals,men don’t want to teach either especially in the lower grades.We need to pay teachers much better,provide them with what they need and watch America rebound.

          10. Their teachers spend almost all their time TEACHING.  Not in constant meetings of all kinds, doing bus drop, recess, lunch room and basketball game duties (other staff do that), all kinds of paperwork, etc…

          11. Transferring another countries educational system and getting the same results is an impossibility; and cherry picking it may be even worse.  Sometimes I wonder if the few Chinese students attending Maine schools are really ‘research rats’ who will be studied to see what can be replicated in China?

          12.  And they can afford it, since they’re not funding the military and other costs borne by Americans. When Finland gets into trouble, guess who they’re going to call? It won’t be Switzerland.

          13. Angus King is running on his record in bringing laptops into the public schools; so if they negatively impact on reading scores in such a dramatic way, we must hold him accountable for this significant public policy decision.

            …then there is who in the King and Baldacci administration invested in APPLE STOCK, which skyrocketed after the purchase, since it was used by APPLE marketing globally and triggered billions of dollars of sales; and the free photo-ops for King and Baldacci worth millions and paid for by APPLE. 

        1. It seems to me that some of the most damage done to our educational system came under Bush’s watch. As I recall he was a Republican.

          1. I believe this article is about what is going on in the Maine education system.  The Dems have set the policy in Maines education system for about 40 years.  LePage and some of his crew are trying to make improvements and all they get is a bunch of crap from the MEA and the usual list of leftist whiners who constantly complain but offer no alternatives.  Sure, Bush didn’t help matters any with NCLB, but Maine created it’s own problems by placing ‘self-esteem’ above standards and reducing discipline to joke.   

          2.  Up until the last decade, Maine’s educational ranking was in the top 10.  Now we are in the top 15.  I think it is time for the chicken littles to gain some perspective.

          3. Much of what happens on the state level is dictated by decisions made on a  national level as is the case with No Child Left Behind. When funding is attached to these mandates, classroom teachers become virtually powerless because they must spend all of their time teaching to the test. 

            Please give me some examples of democratic initiatives that have impacted our educational system in a negative way? What specific pieces of legislation are you talking about?

            As an Independent, I see both parties as being equally responsible, but I also realize that there are SO many factors coming into play that blame cannot be entirely placed on one political party, on teachers or teacher unions. 

            Teachers now must spend the majority of their time teaching to the tests which really have little or no relevance. There is no time for science and social studies in most schools now because all of the focus is on the subjects that are being tested. 

            Teachers used to have the freedom to focus on the basics and didn’t have standardized testing looming over them. We also had a majority of families where the mother stayed at home which is next to impossible today as it takes two incomes to survive in this economy. We also didn’t have cable television, video games, Internet and cell phones keeping our students distracted all of the time.

            I am 100% behind LePage’s ideas for improving education. The system needs to be changed. I believe that standards based education is the way to go. As soon as we eliminate these useless standardized tests, our educational system will improve.

          4. NCLB has existed since 2001.

            If, as you claim, “Teachers now must spend the majority of their time teaching to the tests which really have little or no relevance,” one has to conclude they are not even doing a very good job at that.

          5. Much of what you say about too many video games today, needing more parental involvement, etc. is good, but SBE (standards based education) in its pure form simply is not manageable in many schools nor does it make for the best model, and it WILL NOT HAPPEN in many schools, so please be careful not to just blindly jump onto on the latest “flavor of the month” in education.  You can not foist a Montessori type model on every school, nor can many schools implement a system where each and every student is allowed a completely individualized self-paced educational plan.  It will not happen, nor is it a good model.  And testing?  With LePage’s new teacher evaluation system and those schools who decide to implement pure SBE, there will be MUCH MORE testing and MUCH MORE teaching to the test as teachers across each and every subject including Phys Ed, Art, Music, Vocational, etc. will be evaluated with significant weight to TEST SCORES.  The teaching to the test you don’t like is about to INCREASE DRAMATICALLY, trust me on that.  Also, under SBE there is endless TESTING to see if kids are meeting standards.  And we already have much of what SBE seeks to do with curricula connected to mandated learning results, local common assessments connected to that curricula, and, in most schools, at least two batteries of standardized tests each year and additional literacy lexile assessments to ensure kids are meeting standards and which help schools determine where the weaknesses are.  There are also all manner of interventions for struggling learners with a Response To Interventions law already passed a few years back which schools are still working to implement.

          6. Standard’s based is just another “one size fits all” like NCLB and others that come down from high.It will work for some and not  for others.If the state is willing to fund the training , above and beyond just a couple of years, and give teachers far more input , then perhaps it will work.But trying to drive a square peg into a round hole just doesn’t work

          7. So?  Even the Gods have feet of clay (and we sure know that he did).  Every Child Ledt behind is not a good leagcy for anyone.

          8. Our Republican president sold it to us and our Republican controlled house and senate pushed it through. 

          9. Oh please.  It was Bush’s signature domestic law which he celebrated night and day.  Give us a break.

          10. Actually, that is a great point, but I was thinking on the state level. Now, tell me what we can do about the even more intrusive, Obama’s race to the top, and his federally controlled “national common core standards?”
            Further, what or who is giving you the idea that there won’t be standardized tests with standards based education? Here is SBE in a nut shell, SBE101. Do you prefer to not know how your child is really doing? Do you prefer your child’s assessments be subjective? Do you like the idea that federal government designs national standardized tests to determine if your child’s school will get federal funding? Do you like the idea of the federal government mandating a national curriculum, not just in math nf language arts, but in science and social studies too!

          11.  It can’t be any worse than the intelligent design and creationism folks meddling and trying to get their agenda paid for by taxpayers.STEM and foreign languages needs to be the only thing that we need to work from.Facts,not church ignorance!

          12. Are you in education? Where can I go to read these things that you are saying. I’d be very interesting in learning more.

          13. As to standards, since 1997 we have had the Maine Learning Results uniform statewide mandated educational standards around which curricula are built and tested via a combination of the Maine Educational Assessment and the New England Common Assessment Program.  Most schools also have a second battery of standardized tests, such as the Terra Novas, and also reading lexile assessments, and a huge host of local common assessments across the curriculum all connected to the learning results standards.  The plan now is to simply update one top down uniform set of learning standards with another that will be similar in many regards.  I agree that standards based education in its pure form will actually increase the river of testing that these kids get and will mean more teaching to the test.  It is also simply unmanageable in its pure form in many schools because each and every kid can’t be on an individualized plan.  Nor does it make sense to eliminate age level grades and letter grading systems.  However, it is based on criterion  referenced assessment and results, and kids and parents would theoretically always know just what the standards and learning objectives are.  It has some merit in certain settings, such as a Montessori school environment, but it just can’t work, IN PRACTICE, in many larger schools, nor is it the best educational model in many other ways as I have said.  Self-paced education?  Many kids need to be pushed, and we can not take out large and small group learning dynamics with overly individualized approaches,  etc.

        2. The Republicans are firmly in control of states like Alabama and Mississippi, and these are among the states with the highest rates of poverty, use the largest percentage of federal dollars, and show the lowest educational scores.  Now explain that.  Do you think there may be more factors at work here in these very complex situations?

        3.  Yea look at the chart, the scores started dropping off when “No child left behind” took effect. Whose brain fart was that? Curious George (I shouldn’t have said that, its an insult to the monkey) and his Republican Party.

          1. And which state refused to adhere to the reforms prescribed under NCLB?  And which major of Portland lobbied for millions to support a law suit challenging NCLB?

            Maine resisted NCLB in every possible way, and now the chickens have come home to roost. 

    2. Do you mean like politicians who have to write memos on their hands to remember talking points during speeches? The problem with educational test scores of children today are all directly related to how many of their parents are still writing or tattooing comments on their hands, arms, faces, lower backs etc. etc.

      1. I think the reference was not made toward folks who use notes, but rather those who need teleprompters to speak to everyone including sixth grade classes! The greatest problem we face is the changing environment children are being brought up in. Drugs and media play a big role in attitude, behavior and desire to succeed.

      2.  And we’re paying those ink stained wretches to have more kids instead of telling them they need to take care of themselves.

    3. Complete BS, everyone knows education starts at home.
      Parents are never home anymore, they have to work constantly to pay the criminals
      who run the banks, and to keep their health ins, it’s all they can do these days to keep the lights on let alone keeping gas in to car.

      Wingnuts make up all kinds of drivel, but the fact of the matter is parents are
      for all intents and purposes are absent by force, not by choice.

    4.  That must be it!  I’ve got to find a “social and Marxist illiterate”, especially one who is consistently elected to public office.  And I know how.  Give ’em all a reading test.  I wonder if there are secret meetings of social and Marxist illiterates.  Maybe they even have a secret handshake so they can recognize each other.  Geez!  Is there any hope?

    5. Republicans have done exactly what to improve educational outcomes in Maine? Don’t tell me they cut funding. That does not improve educational outcomes. It lowers outcomes. Don’t tell me that proposals to teach creationism improves educational outcomes. Any program that replaces science with imaginary facts, such as dinosaurs once romped with humans, lowers educational outcomes.
        Under Republicans educational outcomes will worsen. This may be part of their agenda because an ignorant workforce is a poorly paid workforce which leaves more profit for business owners.
        The first step in reversing the declining education in Maine is to vote Republicans out of office. Pure and simple.

      1. 40 years of Dem rule have left us with a more poorly educated populace since the young, smart people are leaving the state.

        1.  They’re leaving a state that doesn’t care about them now.We are the oldest state in the country and worse off for it.Thank God for Portland.

          1.  They’re leaving a state that has been run by “caring” liberals for 40 years.  They didn’t just start leaving 16 months ago. 

          1.  If my retirement wasn’t tied up in my current company I’d be gone too.  I will be in a few short years.  If yu don’t know numerous well educated young people who have left Maine to find decent employment you don’t get out much.  Just take your head out of the sand and look at the census data.

      2.  Exactly!Why a creation museum gets a tax break is the biggest waste of taxpayer money EVER!
        I feel really bad for those kids hit over the head with that garbage.They will be at a disadvantage against kids from here and worldwide who’ve been taught facts and reason.

      3. Yeah, they want to “raise standards” by shifting our tax dollars to church schools and during the 2010 campaign LePage wanted to put creationism in the school curriculum.  Now that’s how to improve Maine education, NOT !

    6. First, if you must use outlandish and hyperbolic terms, it is “socialist” and “Marxist.”  (And you are questioning others’ literacy?)  Second, your use of these terms is indeed outlandish and hyperbolic, well-separated from any sense of reality. — The better data are those indicated via the NECAP tests which in fact show 68% proficiency and many more partially meeting standards.  A  small percentage fail to meet standards.  As the article states, early learning is key, and those schools characterized by systematic literacy programs weighted very heavily to phonics-based foundational instruction, incorporation of consistent and daily experiences applying skills with practice reading authentic and interesting texts, closely monitoring progress against a set of standards with benchmarks and goals, and, very importantly, interventions for struggling readers all together is a recipe for success at the school level. Applying reading in the other academic content areas is also very important, as is incorporating writing and using their own writing to learn to read.  But there is more, and that starts and ends in the homes. Too many low-income parents often struggle with literacy themselves, have few books in the home, and do not read to their children.  Most schools today have kids as early as first grade bringing home books to read.  Parents need to read with them and make sure they are doing that reading.  We can never exclude the extreme importance of the family unit.  Investment in early childhood education is critical, as is a very systematic approach to literacy instruction.  All learning can not be “self-paced” though.  Some need to be pushed.  There are some aspects of the pure SBE approach that have merit in certain settings, but much of the theory in form is not manageable especially in larger schools nor does it make for the best educational model. 
      Parents play a huge role in developing literacy skills

  2. And here’s more bad news from the Maine Association of School Nurses. Despite years of attempting to improve the diets of Maine’s students, 49% remain below average in height.  And a stunning 49% are above average in weight.

    1. I assume you are joking, but to be clear the fact that fewer students than in the past are reading at the same 4th grade level is both statistically significant and depressing.

      1. But one has to ask…is the same exact test being used every year to track these trends over time? Or are the testing companies who also own textbook companies changing the tests that they administer to impact the results so that they can push their new and improved curriculum?

        These test scores mean nothing if the same test is not given when tracking these trends over time. In order for it to be significant, all 4th graders must be given the same test every year, but I suspect that they aren’t.  There is too much money to be made by poor results. 

        1. I remember a year when the Maine Learning Results test changed the writing criteria after they started correcting the test because the students were doing so well and would skew the results! Who taught well that year? Thank you…

        2.  More often the education empire changes the tests so that current results can’t be compared to past results revealing how much more poorly our children are learning.

          1. I have spent a great deal of time in the classroom in the past year and I have been awestruck about how much further ahead these students are compared to when I was in school. It is amazing to see how much they know and how well that they articulate their beliefs and understandings. The world is at their fingertips. And the number of students going on to college these days compared to when I graduated in 1982 is amazing.

          2.  Yet fully 1/5 of these best and brightest require remedial classes just to handle college level classes. 

  3. Nice to see a BDN article stating the truth — Maine has thrown endless money at the education systems in this state, and reading, math, science and other scores have still fallen dramatically over the last decade. More money is not the answer, particularly for new bells and whistles like IPads. Our schools need to get back to the basics.

    1. You’ve got to be kidding.  Teacher and teaching-related jobs have constantly been eliminated or cut back to save money, due to misguided policies of attacking teachers, which includes trying to bully and control them through ridiculous “objective” tests that damage the quality of education and make the best teachers leave the system.

      Republicans keep trying to punish and control teachers and the result is low morale, cruel cuts, and major bureaucratic arrogance.

      1. OMG…DEMOCRATS have been in charge of this state since 1992 and you have the cowardice to blame republicans? Stop the koolaid drinking and be FAIR for once in your life.

        1. Republican school boards in rural areas have done horrible damage in the last few years.  As soon as they came into power, they slammed education. 

          No party-line Republican wants a good science teacher hired anyway.  The first thing the science teacher will say is, “Global warming is primarily human caused.”

          1. Republicans:  the party entirely opposed to science, reality, and reason.  Today for them it is all about giving money to church schools, teaching insanity like “intelligent design”, and oceans of other ridiculous malarkey.

      2. No, you’ve got to be kidding.

        Let’s check on the correlation among: Methadone clinics, Oxycotin abuse, MEA union member numbers and TANF enrollment compared to reading scores shall we?

        Care to guess just how close all these correlate positively?

        Now, we can track medical marjuana clients going forward as well…

        Republicans in Maine have been “in charge” for a little over a year, with Dem’s dominating the Maine Legislature for nearly 40 years!

        Gotta’ find another whipping boy…

      3. The fourth graders in school today started school under the watchful eye of the democratic administration of John Baldacci. I need say no more except you, spruce ,never seem to miss a chance to interject politics into a newsworthy story. The kids deserve much better thinkers than you ! I must also add that Mr. Lepage , much to your dislike , has pushed for teacher performance evaluations which you seem to fear ! I don’t think it’s the kids fault that they score low in reading !

        1. Do you know what kind of damage a Republican majority school board can do to a school?

          Answer:  Fire teachers, double-class size, put kids on buses for hours and day, and hound any instructor who says, “Global warming is primarily human caused.”

          1. The article states that Maine has the 2nd lowest pupil/teacher ratio in the nation.   So you’re just making up another falsehood.

          2. More mythology.  double class size.  That hasn’t happened anywhere in Maine, and with enrollment dropping thanks to Maine Dem policies driving families out of Maine why shouldn’t teachers be fired?  We want to have well educated students.  You just want to spend more money.

    2.  It should really shoot in the foot the talking point that the BDN is part of the liberal Main-stream media. 

    3. The fact of the matter is the kids who get the head start are the ones whose parents can spend quality time with them. Most young professional parents spend all their time at work to keep the lights on and get home in time to realize the bank account is over drawn, spending the rest of the evening sniping at each other as they live the American dream before hustling the kids off to bed.

    1. Our schools are still underfunded.  This article just points out the depressing fact that we also have to contend with deep systemic problems with our education system.

      1. Underfunded???  Not only is reading a problem, but obviously math is too.  Education budgets have increased at greater than the rate of inflation for as far back as I can find data for.

        The systemic problem is that, like almost every government entity, the education empire has morphed into a beast that serves only itself. When they say, “It’s for the children” at contract time, remember this article and don’t believe them.

        1. An educated public is so crucial to the functioning of a democracy (and to the future of our country, really) that I don’t mind if spending increases on it outpace inflation.  We spend tremendously more money on things that are comparatively far less important.

          I do completely agree that that large parts of our education system are poorly run, inefficient, and inherently corrupt.  But I think attempting to repair our current system is a better alternative in the long run than either cutting education spending to the bone or attempting to privatize education entirely.

          1. We spend $130,000 per student for decidedly poor results.  Surely we can do better.

            Education spending is the largest part of property taxes for most towns in Maine, so we don’t spend tremendously more on things that are less important.

        2.  One of the biggest expenses in education is Special Education costs, and to day we are being asked to educate more and more kids with emotional and behavioral issues because it is much cheaper than a residential treatment.

          1. You’re right to a point- health insurance benefits for employees is a huge chunk of a district’s budget- but spec.ed. costs are also very high.

          2. Much easier to classify more students as special ed.  Brings in more money from the state/feds doncha know.

          3.  In some cases that’s probably true- but the state has actually put more pressure on districts to make sure a student has a true disability before having them go into Special Ed..

          4. Um, sure and all those new special ed teacher salaries add up. There are at least 3 times as many now.

          5.  Not to mention that there is a huge well paid group that exists to fund that crowd.Parents have their kids jacked up on Ritalin in first grade.Then they wonder why their own drugs are missing a few years later.

          6.  And because it is more lucrative for schools to classify kids as Special Education so they get more state/federal money.  Remember…when they say it’s for the children, they’re lying.

      2. The schools are in no way underfunded . The money they have is not spent wisely.  Take a look at sports budgets . Bangor needs  a new football field right at the tune of $7,000,000 . Granted they want to publicly fund it but they only play 7 games a year at Bangor. Could they not play the games at Broadway park? I am not saying do away with sports just spend the money where it is needed  most. Bangor high school is doing a lot of great things but also has one of the highest drop out rates in the state of Maine.  Mostly disadvantaged kids that drop out.

        1. Other than a few elites in Hampden, who here can honestly say that spending over $50 Million on the new Hampden school was ‘well spent”?

          1. My point exactly . The new school is going to do nothing to help the kid that need the help the most. Look at college sports in Orono . They pay the football coach $160k a year $240k with benefits . All well and good but the sports program spent 9million more than it brought in last year. Only 1% for the college students play sports. Who Pay for the elites? We all do. If they cannot make a budget that funds thier own sports completely why have sports? No one is giving me my tax dollars back so I can go to college. Put the focus back on educating kids. Lets get real about how money is spend and how the grading system is designed to make the elite look more elite nothing to do with what a kid really learned. 

          2. It’s probably better to spend the money creating a bigger dump in Hampden. At least you can smell the results.

  4. When school districts throughout the State have “reading /literacy specialists” who are often times paid nearly $100, 0000, yet these people have no qualifications to be in these positions, it is no surprise many Maine students have low reading scores.  The problem with reading is that most of the teachers have not been properly trained at the University level.  I have been in classes with these teachers and they question why they were not trained properly.  The problem lies in the University system and the way in which they train (do not train) teachers to teach reading.  They have only trained in the whole language system, a complete failure.  There are some teachers who have taken it upon themselves to be trained – up to two years – to help children with dyslexia (the largest learning disability there is), I will give those teachers credit because they “get it.”  However, the majority of them have not been properly trained in how to teach reading, of which phonics would be a huge component of that.  Ask teachers what their reading program is, many are simply trade books with no sequence.  Then, people wonder why students cannot decode or spell.  This is a no brainer.  The problem is the same people have been in charge at the University level for too long!

  5. Tea partiers think that if we can just lower taxes, test scores would go back up. Actually, they don’t care much about test scores. Just the taxes, that’s pretty much it.

    1.  Did you even read the article?  We are among the top spenders on education in the country with little to show for it in the way of results.  Oh wait, maybe you did read it and are a product of Maine public schools and just can’t understand it.

      1.  We have to pay higher rates on busing (especially now that buses have been privatized in most school districts) heating, and many other things.  It would make sense that smaller schools would require more money per pupil if you had even a basic understanding of economics.  In terms of the results, Maine is still a top 15 state when it comes to educational outcomes.  Even higher if you control for poverty.

        1. Pray tell, please list the school districts whose bussing costs INCREASED when contracting out to private companies?

          1.  http://www.phillyburbs.com/news/local/courier_times_news/report-privatizing-school-transportation-more-expensive-for-taxpayers/article_5bab1091-d08f-5909-ad51-89d52e5df4f4.html?mode=print

            http://neatoday.org/2012/04/09/outsourcing-school-services-is-a-poor-bargain/

            http://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=1987725

            http://www.inthepublicinterest.org/case/school-services-southfield-school-district-michigan

            http://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=1987725

            http://www.myrtlebeachonline.com/2011/05/28/2186567/the-carolinas.html

            Let’s face it, when it comes to efficiency, often times the Private sector cannot compete with the public sector.  The reason of course is that there are far too many leeches at the top.

          2. Leeches at the top???

            Meet Paul Violette, Dale McCormick, and the Maine Bond Bank.

            You mustn’t get out much.

    2. The Tea Party is responsible for the decline in literacy over the last  eighteen years??? They have only been in existance for three years.

      1. Most of them are older than 18. Some of the people I know have been te partiers all their lives…. just a new name for same old problem child.

  6.  It has to do with the teachers union being in control of education.

    30 years ago it was a teacher in a room with 20+ students TEACHING. They would do recess duty, bus duty, and did most of their planning after school hours.
    Now the teachers all have at least one Ed Tech in the room, they have an 80 period a day for planning

        1. You’re guessing wrong.  I work an average of 10+ hours a day, 46 weeks a year and have for the past 30 years.

          I’m guessing you work in the education empire. Motto: “It’s for the children, so hand over your wallet and don’t even think about evaluating our work.”

          1.  Sure you do Oldmainer, I bet you actually only work about 3 or 4 of those hours, spend the rest of the time posting on the BDN, and are generally unproductive.  It seems if anything you are projecting your weaknesses on teachers.  Now if you believe that the average teacher only works 6 and a half hours a day (that is the time average teachers are actually in front of their classrooms in Maine) then pray-tell when do they get the lesson planning done, the grading done, and the calls and notes home to parents done?  The average American teacher has over 900 hours of INSTRUCTION time a year, any teacher spends twice this when you factor in all of the responsibilities that go with the job.  Meanwhile, you get to punch out your widgets, go to the restroom when you need, get up and walk around the factory floor when you need a break, and go home with no responsibility at the end of the day.  Sounds like a dream job to me.

          2. If it’s a dream job then maybe you should do it.  Show me a teacher who spends all 6 1/2 hours of every day in front a class. Like the mythical underpaid teacher, they don’t exist.

            You’re funny of you think I punch out widgets and have no responsibility after hours.  Unlike a teacher, I carry a beeper and am on call 24/7. 

            Try to contact a teacher the day after the 2 1/2 month summer vacation starts.  Good luck with that.

          3.  Sure Old Mainer, what do you do?  I’ll take the dream job.  My father was chained to a beeper, not a bad life, less responsibility and far more money than teachers ever make, all in return for occasionally being called in to work at a moments notice and receiving comp-time to make up for it.  Really not very hard at all, and I am sure the same can be said for your job.

          4.  No comp time for me.  Salaried. 

            How could there be less responsibility than teaching?  There is zero accountability.  We’ve all been told that teachers CAN’T be measured.

          5.  Then you haven’t talked to teachers. They WANT to be evaluated, but on how they do THEIR job, not how students perform.  If you have good parental support, anyone can become an effective teacher, maybe even you could Oldmainer.  With parents who don’t see the value in education and don’t do their job raising their kids, nobody can get every student to pass the test.  The problem is true evaluation would cost too much money so instead we pay more money to the standardized testing empire to come up with bogus evaluation measures derived from evaluations of students.  It doesn’t take a genius to see that this is flawed.  Even someone who isn’t trained in assessment can see why this system will not work.

    1.  School boards and administrators are in control of education.  Most of the people elected to school boards have no idea what they are doing.  Put the teachers in charge for once and see how things improve.

    2. STUDENT ACHIEVEMENT: The school board adopts academic 
      standards for pupils and establishes expectations for education in the 
      district. The school board monitors student achievement and exercises 
      general supervision over the schools. 
      POLICYMAKING: Policymaking covers the broad range of rules and 
      regulations that school boards enact, alter or repeal. Board policies are 
      the basis of school district operations. To have a well-organized school 
      system, the board needs a sound philosophy of education as a basis 
      for policymaking. 
      EVALUATION: Evaluation is a continuous function that applies to 
      policies, people, and programs. All facets of school operations should 
      be evaluated regularly because evaluation points out strong and weak 
      points in the school system and establishes a basis for future action. 
      Although the school board should welcome information and advice 
      from all sources, the final responsibility for evaluation rests with the 
      board. 
      BOARD-ADMINISTRATOR RELATIONS: Board members should be 
      aware of the difference between their role and that of school 
      administrators. In essence, it is this: boards set policy, administrators 
      carry it out. The school board should set its goals and operational 
      policies and expect the district administrator to carry them out. 
      Although the board should refrain from becoming involved in the dayto-day operation of the school, it should follow up on the 
      administration and operation of the schools and require periodic 
      reports for purposes of evaluation. 

    1. I think this pretty much nails it. But then you couldn’t have parents taking some responsibility.

  7. The teachers union is in charge of education. They have worked hard at making sure the teachers don’t have to teach or be responsible for what the child is lacking.

    30 years ago teachers were in a room with 20+ students and taught them, did recess duty and even bus duty. Now they have Ed Techs that do that….and teachers get an 80 minute planning period every day. They still can’t keep caught up on their grading papers when they spend that period on facebook now can they?

    K12 has applied as a virtual charter school. I homeschool now but will be looking into this amazing option for my children. I am not a professional teacher yet my children consistently score higher on standardized tests than children who have been educated in a classroom with someone who went to 4+ years of college. Explain that to me! I spend a whole lot less and manage to do a whole lot more.

    1.  I would hope your children perform better on standardized tests.  They have a teacher ratio of what, 2 to 1?

      1.  I’m not a teacher. That is the point…..why would they learn more at home with me then at school with ‘teachers’?

        3 words for you:

        Virtual charter school.

        it is the future of education in Maine and coming soon, free to Maine residents!

    2. And the 4+ years of college for many school teachers doesn’t mean much because they’re taken up with gut classes in education, leading to degrees in education, from schools of education.

      1. Something you’ll never hear on a college campus, “I couldn;t cut it in education, so I switched majors to engineering”.  Education – that fall back major on college campuses across america.

        1. I have heard that very thing in college, people couldn’t handle the work load in education so they switched to Engineering.  In fact of every student who graduates from the College of Education, only half will ever teach, the others will seek jobs in the private sector where pay checks are fatter and responsibility is less.

    3.  This is wrong on many levels.  If the association was truly in charge of education like you claim, we would have better educators in the classroom.

      1. OH really? I speak from my personal experience this year. The Union protected a teacher that called students names like fat, ugly, retard, stupid, dumb. One that told the kids that they would be lucky to work at McDonalds with the rest of the retards when they finished school. Called students liars because she didn’t want to believe what they had to say. Then protected this teacher after she kicked a student in the head when he was bent over…..and the school says they can’t get rid of her because it will cost too much! So tell me again how the union isn’t in control of who is and isn’t in the classroom!

        Better educators? I some how doubt it! We all know the mill unions that protected those that didn’t really want to work….this is no different, not one bit. I was so happy that the ineffective administration/teacher bills passed this year.  Maybe it will no longer be acceptable to experience negative growth in 6th grade math at the local middle school.

        1.  If that teacher is still in the classroom- and I hope they get him out- then the administration has fallen down on the job.  The association will see to it that members get legal representation in case of a hearing that they’re entitled to  when they pay their dues- which is about $550 a year. It’s not the association protecting that person-it’s someone else. Tenure can’t be enacted unless both sides agree to it. 

          1.  It could also be that this is rumor spread by students who were mad because they got bad grades.

  8. And how many parents these days allow their children to stay home from school for 40-50 or more days a year.  How many parents read to their children at night?

    1.  Maybe the solution is to let parents keep more of their money.  Sending it to the education empire sure hasn’t helped.

      1. Who cares if you have money, it’s time with the kids that matters, and it is time with them they don’t have!

          1. Ol’ timer most young parents don’t have time for the kids, they’re working all the time to pay the health ins criminals and the criminals who run the banks so they don’t foreclose on their property. But you are right “time is of the essence.”

    2. how can a school pass them to the next grade when the law is pretty cut and dry? Your child can not miss 40 or 50 days of school, excused, without having some significant medical problems.

      1. Too bad this isn’t true. The teacher is expected to catch these kids up. One thing we ought to do is check to see if this study is comparing similar populations nin the states. In the last report of test scores, the highest performing states tested the fewest percent of their students. Guess where Maine was… Yup, we test them all!

          1. Believe what you like. I looked at the results. They were there for the reading. I think the states that perform better are the ones with populations that value education. I wouldn’t put maine in that category.

      2.  School boards set policies that dictate students can’t be held back more than once.  I know plenty of teachers who know that students should be held back but admin and school boards conspire to pass the buck.

        1.  And lets face it-if you have a disruptive problem student for a year,do you want him/her for two?

    3.  GREAT point.My parents read for at least a few minutes to all of their kids/grandkids no matter how tired they were.Guess what.Every child was a success,including published  authors.

  9. I notice the issue of parental involvement — and changing ideas about the nature of it — doesn’t appear in the article.  I read above grade level in fourth grade almost entirely through my mother’s dedicated efforts at home, not because of anything the school did right.

  10. Maine’s fourth-grade NAEP math scores have risen since 1992, but not as quickly as the national average, although Maine remains above the national average.

    So, are things not improving? – the headline should be “mixed” results.

    Some factors here:
        With our young college graduates moving out of state to take jobs, who remains here in the state to have children in our schools? Basically, our gene pool takes a beating when the brightest parents have to move out of state for jobs.

       As Not4us points out, our university teacher training program does not teach the research-based techniques of reading needed to teach the reading-challenged. Not that the techniques that they teach are not helpful, but they are inadequate for those who need specific and intensive phonetic and phonemic awareness instruction. The issue, though, is an almost “cult-like” adherence to de-emphasizing phonetic instruction among the university faculty based solely on their own experiences of learning to read quickly and easily without the intensive and repetitive instruction that their less fortunate students need.

      To respond to people like Quequeeg and the people who “like” that post: one of the actual accomplishments of Marxist regimes has been to raise the overall literacy of the peoples in those countries. Often, prior to a regime change, the poor people had no access to education.  The post does, however, hit on a key point (maybe why there were several “likes”): Discipline and hard work are essential to our challenged readers’ progress. Unfortunately, the post implies that those are not happening in our schools, and that is just plain wrong. Visit a school Quequeeg. The kids and teachers work hard all day with fewer recesses and shorter lunch periods than in the past. If you have a problem with teaching/teachers, become a teacher and show others how it is done.

    By the way, are you calling Bowen/LePage Marxists?

      1. “Maybe” not a Marxist?

        Wow, that hyperbole is extraordinary.

        History WILL treat Lepage better than Baldacci’s adherance to “How does that make you feel about yourself” for the preceeding eight years.

        Bowen’s appointment, alone, will do a  creditable job of cleaing up Maine’s DOE!

    1.  Phonics werks for abowt half the werds n the Engleash languege.  That culd b y  it has bin alledgidle de-imphisized.

      1.  I only hope you are not a teacher if you think what you wrote is a good argument for not teaching phonics to reading/writing challenged students. If you are, then take a good look – you are part of the problem.
        A really good literacy teacher is a competent linguist with extensive knowledge of the vast array of rules of the various languages that have been incorporated into modern English. If you think a reader memorizes all the words and uses “context” to figure the unknown words, please read the peer-reviewed research.

        1.  I have read the peer reviewed research, all of it points to a combination of reading strategies INCLUDING whole word and phonics is essential to learning how to read and read fluently.  This idea that phonics is somehow a panacea when it comes to reading ability is short sighted and dangerous.  We must use every tool at our disposal to help children read.

  11. Funny thing that years ago children learned to read really well. What did those teachers do that ingrained reading well into their students? Why not go back to the past and learn what their secret was? It is pretty sad when you listen to some of the big athletes in college on scholarships that don’t talk well and that can’t read. If you can’t read you don’t have much of a future.

    1. True. Maine needs to return to teaching the basics, and forget the bells and whistles like IPads and funding new preschool programs. Our schools need to let the private sector provide the babysitting, and teach our kids to read, write, do math and science.

      1.  It’s so much easier for the education empire to demand more funding for the latest fad (remmeber open classrooms and new math?) than it is to actually teach the kids.  Just keep giving those step raises for the teachers fogging a mirror for another year and everything will be fine.

      2. We’ve seen the results of teaching the basics. 20 years of
        Texas’s no child left behind puts them last in almost all metrics used to
        measure education.

      3.  You can’t separate the two- the communities and the schools need to work together to raise healthy kids- our next generation of leaders.

    2. Pssst…I’ve got the secret. Years ago those children had functional parents. By golly, back then kids would enter school already reading. Today, some of them either are (Or at least it’s every educational aid’s wish) still wearing diapers. Yep, it’s sure a puzzle figuring out why Johnny can’t read when he doesn’t even know how or when to use a toilet. But rest assured that his thumbs will fly on whatever device you put in his hands so that mom and dad won’t have to raise him.

      1. I think you’ve got it too. Let mom and dad teach these five year olds to read and write like the old days. You can’t really expect the teachers to help out there can you? In your mind teachers are nothing but baby sitters with retirement and health insurance.

        1. That’s what I think? Odd how some people seem to so freely believe they can speak “for” others. What a great way to start a conversation, think of something stupid to say and then proclaim it to be a belief of someone other than yourself. Just sad. Please come back when you decide you want to discuss something I’ve actually stated. Have a great day!

      2.  Yes.  Parents want to pass the buck to day care workers, teachers, and electronic devices and TV rather than do their own hard work at raising the kids they produced.  My parents read to me nearly every day and encouraged/helped me to read before I started school.  And they were poor and worked many long hours.  Their priorities were in the right place.  Nowadays we dare not criticize parents who are all busy criticizing teachers.  Nonetheless, what happens at home is more important than what happens at school.

      3. Sorry I wrote above. I hadn’t read yours yet. Let’s have a lunch on the deck… your family and mine.

        1.  Another perfectly good reason for abortion and family planning.THANK YOU PLANNED PARENTHOOD!

          1. Heck, why stop at abortion.  Why not just round up the undesirable humans and do away with them. Didn’t someone try that in 1939?  I guess in your eyes his only flaw was he waited until they were born to do it.

          2.  So let’s see-you hate parents with too many kids but you want them to be like the Duggars.
            Make up your mind.Conservatives hate kids( always have) and will do anything to starve the funding.

          3. Yes, children should be murdered and discarded as garbage, rather than be loved and nurtured, right?

      4. So true……a big issue with education today is that not enough is taught or reinforced in the home 8(

    3. The secret is that they did not have to spend all of their time teaching to the tests which really have little or no relevance. They had freedom to focus on the basics and didn’t have standardized testing looming over them. We also had a majority of families where the mother stayed at home which is next to impossible today as it takes two incomes to survive in this economy. We also didn’t have cable television, video games, Internet and cell phones keeping our students distracted all of the time. 

      1.  Looming over them?  When was the last time you saw a teacher fired for a student’s test score.  Lifetime employment with no standards is the problem.

          1.  Obviously there are still poor teachers in the classroom.  Heck, we’re constantly reminded that poor pay attracts poor teachers and we need to pay more to attract good teachers.

          2.  Yup- especially in math and the sciences- where potential teachers can earn way in private business than teaching.  We’re not getting the brightest and the best in some content areas.

          3. So paying what we have now (Not the best and brightest by your admission) will somehow make it better? 

            Teachers are as interchangeable  as widgets.  We pay them all the same.  The only variation is how long they’ve been fogging a mirror and for the advanced degrees we pay for them to acquire.  And the advanced degrees have not been shown to have much bearing on how well our students learn.

    4. One of the secrets is that there were fewer broken homes. An agressive lawyer will never be a good replacement for a loving, disciplined home-life.

  12. I remember being in school and having reading groups–one group for the best readers, one for average readers, and one for those who struggled. Each group made a lot of progress, but the groups were happy, too. Those who struggled were not embarrassed because nobody else in their group read well, either. The kids who were more proficient could go onto harder material and the middle group was challenged too. We’ve gotten away from that because of new, different teaching methods. Letting kids go at a pace that’s comfortable to them, like how it used to be done, was much better than today’s methods, in my opinion. 

      1. I’m not sure. All I can say is that my two kids had to do one back in the third grade. I’ve not seen one come into the house since.

  13. Maine has the smallest income growth . Yes poverty Brings down scores.  I think if scores only drop a bit the teachers are doing a fine job. Not to mention the laptop dependence  Is not helping much. Want to solve low test scores fix poverty. Take a look at Finland. When school place a large chunk of grades on homework and some kids can not get help at home it dose nothing but create  a bigger divide between the halves and the halve nots.  

  14. More money obviously not the answer nor smaller class sizes since the results haven’t shown improvement.  Perhaps more emphasis on fundamentals and grouping students by ability like in the OLDEN days would provide better results instead of more modern, touchy-feely techniques.

  15. I feel strongly that we need to catch these children before they even enter school.  When a child discovers that learning is fun then they will love learning all of their lives.  Begin by playing games with them for they can learn the sound of letters.  And, on and on it goes.

    1. I think that is a good part of the problem. Parents not reading and making learning fun before children start school. Shut the TV off take them out and show them a leaf a frog etc. Read to them play games with them. If children start learning at home then they may be interested in learning at school. I also think that education should go back to the basics before the technology kicks int.

      1. I am in full agreement with you.  I have never been a lover of board games, however, I taught my son to sound out letters by playing Bingo.  Later he became the caller in order to identify letters and numbers.  Later we played scrabble.  It was cheap entertainment which was good because we didn’t have any extra money.  By the time he began school, he could read and write and was ready to take off.

        1. Board games, games of any kind are great.  Favorites in our family including with our grandkids have included Sorry, even Trivial Pursuit (junior edition).  They were exposed to chess and checkers early on and still play them.  Arguable whethter or not it affects literacy but the game p;laying atmosphere is great for family (and behavior) atmospheres.

  16. Educators have very little clue about the real world. All this extra pressure put on kids to learn can sometimes turn them off to learning in the long run.  I love to learn things just not in a formal education setting. My son reads at a lexile level of 1,276 in 7th grade . He failed both reading an English mostly due to the fact that homework is a large portion of his grade.  I wonder how many kids score more poorly on test read at a lower lexile level but have a mommy at home help with homework? So mommy helps and the kid get the grade for it . The system is far from perfect.

    1. Unfortunately, theachers have a very good clue about the real world, the inadequate world that too many kids have to live in outside the classroom.

      1. Maybe . Somethings are not taught in school that are needed in the real world. I think about the difference  between my lady friend and I in math . She has 6 years of college deans list . Trig ,calculus, statistics, etc. I only took algebra1 . I am so far better with her in numbers and the real world. She has the education to prove it. I could give many examples . Like I said before and I will stand by it education is designed to make the elite more elite . Her coming from an upper middle class family me from a lower call family. She liked school . I was made to feel stupid in school . Maybe to do lack of social skills, poor uneducated family back in the 70s I was a slow learner .  Maybe things have changed some .  Its still about how much money you have. Anyone with enough money can buy a degree today. Just pay someone to take online classes in your name.  It has little to do with what you learned  or what you retained of what you learned. 

  17. The lesson parents have to learn from this.  When you have toddlers it’s very important for you to read to them.  Take the time,  read them a bed time story.  Go to the local library have the child take some books out  make it fun. 

    1. Great point and so true but unfortunately living the American
      dream these day leaves little time for the little ones.    

      1. Leaves little time if the parents don’t put kids first. Keep paying the layabouts for pumping out babies and you’ll continue to get the same results.

        1. No you are blaming the parents but yet it other statements you blame the teachers now which is it  ??

          1. But don’t for get there are kids that have a very hard time to remember things . Like me the only way i could remember things was to read the subject over an over at least 9 times or more than i could only remember parts of it. that made me real made because i could not remember it

    2. When my elementary age grandsons were infants, their doctor gave them books for the 1st year of their life.  Is that program still in existence?  I agree that getting a library card at an early age, regualr trips to the library 9including preschool reading groups) and reading at home are excllent programs.

  18. Big surprise reading scores are down, education starts at home, when both parents have to spend 80 hours a week at work to keep the lights on is it any wonder the kids suffer?

      1. I know you guys want Maine to be Wisconsin East. Walker may have gotten away with it there but the price he’s going to pay will be steep as will those in Maine who move forward with the same draconian nonsense. You forget many understand most of this stuff has nothing to do with Maine, we know this is a nationwide agenda be pushed the extreme right and you’re corporate henchmen. The beginning of the end starts on November 7.

  19. This shows, once again, that throwing large sums of money at education cannot replace good teachers & involved parents.

    1. You are so right even though lobbyist factions tell us that it will and teachers unions tell us the teachers do not make enough to do a good job.Maybe we need more teachers aides so the teachers can have more time off and the education is left in the hands of others it may take an up turn.Surely there is a few good teachers left   

  20. Disadvantaged kids do not perform as well on test. Maine has the slowest income growth in the nation . That tells a lot. Education is designed to make the elite look more elite. Some classes homework counts for 50% of the grade while test only count for 30% . Kids who have uneducated parents tend not to get as much help on homework.

  21. If we let and assist boys in reading what they are interested in then scores could improve some.  For years, mostly female reading teachers and experts have decided what kids needed to read to become proficient readers (mostly fiction), while a large number of  boys like to read non-fiction and action/adventure stories.

  22. I know teachers who just keep their mouths shut and do as the supers tell them to do, under the understanding that they will be blackballed from teaching again and lose there pensions… Supers like their operations to look nice and clean, they don’t care about anything else except their own appearence..  Teachers don’t have a choice on how to teach in most schools. Just make the super happy by not angering any parents… When teachers have years invested in the system they have no where else to go and get that type of money, they have no job skills. That is why. they are submissive to the supers and never question anything…
    They should have a teachers board elected to hire and fire supers.

        1. I think what that person was trying to say was that they have no other job skills  to get a job on the out side

  23. Some of this information isn’t correct; particularly the average income of Maine teachers.  It surely isn’t $47,000.  

    1. If you factor in suppers with $144k positions I think it is not saying 50% make that much just it the average pay . Some schools teachers are payed much more than others.

    2. Absolutely! I’ve been teaching for 13 years and haven’t reached that. And that’s with a Masters degree.

        1. I have a BS degree in Education and a Masters in Instrumental Conducting. I’m a band teacher in N. Maine. I make 41,295 this year.

  24. It’s not our education system that’s deficient, it’s our system, our way of life, the American dream which requires both parents to constantly work to afford any of its benefits the biggest of which is our children. It also requires you to be asleep in order to believe in its truth and if the truth be known, education and our children are damned.

  25. Can’t just throw money at a problem. Teachers and schools have stepped up — parent(s) need to start doing their part. 

    1.  No, the teacher colleges have not done their jobs. But what happened in 1994/94/96 when the trend changed to a worse result. Something different was done to the whole system at the same time.

      1.  You are absolutely right.   That  is about the time the “whole word method” of teaching reading was brought back by universities as a primary teaching method taught to aspiring elementary school teachers after already failing  many years before   and “phonics instruction” was kicked to the curb.  We need to bring back a top notch word attack program taught in first grade when the most children are ready for it and bring it back fast.   This is not the fault of  teachers but rather a misguided education program at the university level where future teachers are being taught.  We need to reeducate existing teachers in the best word attack methods available and make it their responsibility that each and every child masters word recognition skills.  In addition we need to revamp what is being taught at the college level.

        1. Thank you for “getting it.”  This is so obvious.  I have heard this from so many teachers as well.  They graduate with a degree in education, yet they have not clue how to teach reading.  It is absolutely disgraceful.  I will say the University of Maine is the worst culprit.

  26. Simple problem, the teachers are not being taught how to teach reading and they are getting caught up in their knickers, just listen to a diagnostic evaluation and it is unintelligible to a parent. Disgraceful performance on the teacher colleges all round.

  27. Experts say reading ability “… is one of the strongest early indicators there is about his likelihood for success or failure in school and later in life.’     This is not rocket science.   If a child cannot read he cannot do science, social studies, etc.   In other words, he fails at everything.    The Bangor school system should be used as a model for other school systems in the state.   They have had a great track record  over the years and are obviously doing many things right.  We  need to take a good look at our teacher preparation programs at the state schools of higher learning  to find out if they are making phonics instruction a big part of their teaching of reading programs.  There is no excuse for reading failure.  It is important to note what has been done to make sure we don’t continue doing more of the same old stuff that does not work.  It should be abundantly clear that throwing more money at the schools is not the answer.    We have lower student /teacher ratios,  more supplemental programs, many more tax dollars being spent on special education in the way or remedial reading instruction and yet performance is abysmal  as compared to years ago.    These children should be successful in first grade with strong reading programs teaching them good word attack skills right in the classroom  Go out there and find the most successful teaching of reading programs available and get to it fast before more kids go down the tubes.   This state in general has not been teaching reading effectively.   Bring back a strong phonics program and bring it back fast. This is disgraceful

      1. iPads have been in school for about 1 year.  In your limited mind, that has caused the decline since 1994.  :}

  28. Children in Maine are not allowed to begin school unless they are 5 years old as of October 15.  Pre-school is on the chopping block in many districts because there simply isn’t money for it.  Where will the early intervention come from if not home?

    1. Head start has been shown to have no effect on student performance by 5th grade.  Pre-K is just  a ploy to get more union dues.

      1. You are absolutely correct.  If the teachers are not trained properly in the scientific research based methods of teaching reading (which the majority of them are not), it does not matter what age the children begin school, they will still fail. The ones who can learn to read the whole language method will still succeed, however, those who need phonics will continue to struggle. 

    2. I guess early intervention/preschool isn’t working, so why fund it?

      My child was reading and doing math at second grade level by the time she started school.. The school was not very happy with me because of it.. they made her an aide to keep her from being bored…

  29. So Dutson doesn’t think more money is the solution.His real thought is “break the unions”Don’t lie.

  30. Take away the pictures, like the ones on bathroom doors. Make people read.
    The best escape from reality or stress and safest, but most addicting habit to have is reading.

  31. We can argue politics till we are all red or blue in the face.  It still doesnt fix anything.  I was reading letters from my aunt in cursive at age 5 before Kindergarten.  It starts at home.  We had no cable tv, video games, or Facebook.    I bet the 4th graders who can’t read are better at Halo than I am.

  32. Maine, along with all the US educational system ought to look at the Candian Education system. First and fourmost each Canadian teacher needs a 4 year undergrad degree, in addition to a second 2 year education degree – 6 years of post seconday education at the UNIVERSITY level before they can even get their teachers certification. In addition each teacher is STRONGLY encouraged to obtain their Masters degree – far more then what a US teacher has – far far more training.

  33. Everyone always points there fingers at the Teachers,  It is time to point fingers towards the real villians,  The supers. They created this mess in their struggle for power… They are the untouchables.
    We need to give power to the Teachers, who are the ones teaching.. Supers throw wrench into everything… why do anything when the supers want credit for everything… Yet they will blame teachers on low test scores….
    Lets make it so supers are hired by a teachers board, then and only then will the students matter..

  34. The problem isn’t with the schools or funding (before the cuts).  The answer lies with supporting strong families that support strong students.  Provide more supports to families, involve them in community activities that support families, community, and a future….strong academics will follow. 

    This is where we will find the answer to many but not all of the problems.

  35. It’s kind of odd that the MDOT can spring for $15 million to build a new exit at I-295 in Yarmouth but there’s no money to expand public libraries. Hmm …

  36. sadly it’s not the schools fault.. it’s the parents that let their kids come home, and play games on the computer/playstation/Xbox… you need to get your child interested in some other activity.. something you can both get into. model rockets, airplanes, robotics, sports…etc. the kid will get interested, and all you need to do is supply the materials.. most of which are cheap!! and they will read whatever material you can get for them.  get your kids excited about reading.. go to a bookstore every other week, and buy them a $5-10 book. make it a challenge, read a book get something in return… such as a reward.. ice-cream, or small toy, or $5… something.. above all… be a parent!! don’t set your kids in front of a tv and expect them to be taught everything at school.

  37. It’s the schools and the school administrators.
    We have been asking that our daughter, who has issues with retaining after reading something, be given simple books to read, take home, and do book reports. Nothing! Nothing!!!!!!!!!!!!

    We are at an end of my patients. Last week, in her english class, there was no teacher.

    The teachers allow students to listen to ipods and use cell phones.
    The computers given to them is used for nothing but music and social sites.
    The list goes on and on.

    I am actually gathering up all my concerns, and the things we have noticed in our own district, and will soon be sending to , or meeting with The DOE, in Augusta. There is something wrong when The Student Counsel decides it’s ok to use cell phones. No it’s not!

    Look, we, as taxpaying citizens need to remind these school administrators that their job is to teach. Reading, Writing, Science, and History. Stop the social indoctrination. Stop the “dress like a cowboy day”, maybe for gym, our kids could do something other than walk to the local ice cream stand for a cone. Stop taking our children out of school without parental permission! 4 times our daughter came home and announced that she had been on a bus at this college, or a tech school. She was 13, no parental permission. We as taxpaying citizens need to stand up and remind these school administrators who exactly pays the bill for this, and who exactly do they work for.

    Higher Taxes + Lower Test Scores = No Future.

    I’ve had enough. Anyone else?

    And the icing on the cake; We have a substitute High School teacher dating a senior. We have someone in the shool administration that thinks it’s ok for her 14 year old daughter to date a 19 year old from college. If this is the morals of the administration, our children have no chance.

  38. The money was wasted in the past with the democrats in power.  Reading took a back seat to touchy feely stuff.

  39. perhaps if the young students were NOT placed on school busses for 45 mins.+- EACH DIRECTION they would be more interested/conditioned to read more/often.     thanks to previous administration education policy for closing lots of the smaller schools in order to make “larger classes and more selection of same” instead of people from your own community who know you, your family and even the students needs.     All this to save a VERY small amount of $$$ in the short run.

    1. School buses can be equipped with WI FI and turned into study halls. Athletes may get better grades as a result of the buses they ride on.

  40. I’m glad for charter schools.. At least some will have the chance to learn and excell….
    Let the parents raise their children and let the teachers teach..
    Schools are more intersted in social issues then teaching..
    They are molding little minds into liberal mush.

    1. Vote Republican to keep Foreigners, Minorities, Woman, Socialists, Gays and Liberals from ruining your life.

      1. Republicans lobbied for Charter schools, while your Dem’s opposed them; so that makes you glad we have Republicans…..or did your HATERADE just kick in? 

  41. Before hurling ad hominem  attacks accusing folks of being “Marxist illiterates,” it would help if the person hurling  the insults was not himself an illiterate. He obviously has not read a word of Karl Marx or Frederick Engels, and thus is not qualified to judge whether someone is a Marxist. With important exceptions, comments from readers in these pages are far too often staggeringly ignorant and mean-spirited, reflecting (sadly) the dismal state of our educational system.

  42. We have a tier of issues here.  Tier 1  is more and more kids are not entering school prepared in the basic fundamentals that parents need to provide.  Tier 2 is that those training educators haven’t spend a day in the classroom, therefore, preparation is inadequate.  Tier 3 is that the government is trying to impose  regulations on something they know very little about.  Solutions?  Create ways in which parents are held accountable.  When a child is screened for kindergarten, they are not allowed to begin until they have demonstrated “readiness”( more Pre-school programs)  In the area of teacher preparation,  “reward” those that excel in the profession by having them teach those that want to teach.  Do away with the need for a doctorate to teach at the college level.   Pay the experts what they are worth.   Organize a system in higher education in which students must re-apply after two years of teacher preparation.  Weed out those that are not fit to teach.   Do not allow the government to create any educational policies.  Leave that to those that know most about education…. educators.

  43. realize that this is a little off topic– but with regards to “fads”.    One of the latest silly things is to start high schools  at a later time of day so as to help teens who need more sleep.   This probably helps a few but as a teacher of 38 yrs. experience I’m seeing the lots of the same kids come in late – but at a later time in the morning and then groaning about how late they are getting out  ( dark in fall etc.)and cannot play sports, act,dance  or even have a part time job.

  44. Where other than school and perhaps some parents or day care personnel do young children get any sort of encouragement to learn how to read? Of those, how many actually read to their children on a regular basis? I don’t know, but I doubt the number who do is more depressing than impressive, which all leads to another question: given all the commercial disincentives in popular culture, how good are our chances for a workable, sustainable democracy?

  45. I have taught children to read and I am not a teacher with a degree but a “natural” teacher. Reading to them, helping them sound out words and encouraging through good books and their own interests is what works most of the time, barring any physical problems. The formulas and systems developed by so-called professionals DO NOT WORK. Standardization is what is wrong with that plan. Everyone learns in a different way, and a good teacher needs to flexibly work with individual children to find what works for that child. Throw the theories and workshops out and let experienced teachers teach!

  46. Laptops, tweets, and cell phones are probably to blame. PERU went and equipped all children with laptops and there was a significant disappointment with the results. Time to dissect the impact of all those Macbooks on reading, and make hard decisions on software being used, etc. 

    Reading has been reduced to ‘sound bites’ and books dumbed down. Visual learning predominates with the translatory medium of words.

    GTGN(got to go now).

  47. I’m sure glad the clowns running the  educational gulag today weren’t there when I went to school.  I was unable to read until I was 11, for those of you without children, that is the sixth grade. Luckily for me, my mother was an educator, and my school didn’t give up when the going got tough. 

    By my junior year in High school, I had read all of Dickens published works, many of Kipling’s, and most assuredly Motor’s Manuals back to 1948. 

    I now have three degrees, and have spent much of my adult life helping children (and some adults) learn to read.

    Don’t you dare chalk children off in the fourth grade.

  48. Maybe if they allowed the teachers to teach and not spend so much time testing students, the scores would rise, because students would actually be allowed to benefit from good teaching.

  49. Before(some) kids had cell phones,Facebook,  flat screens and video games and parents that paid attention- they did read. This has nothing to do with politics. Be a decent parent, they’ll read plenty!

    1.  EVERYTHING has to do with politics.  Do we as a country value education?  Do we as a society encourage reading?  Do we as English speaking people demand correct language usage, on TV, in advertising, and in conversation?

      Young students are little sponges.  They will mop up everything we set in front of them.  Currently we are (as a whole) fixated on electronic devises that don’t require reading skills.

      New Hampshire, North Dakota, and Wisconsin all spend less per pupil than Maine.  They also produce higher scoring students…. What does that tell you.

Leave a comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *