CARROLL PLANTATION, Maine — The state’s top environmental agency will hold a public hearing to help determine whether to permit an industrial wind site proposed for Bowers Mountain, a spokeswoman said Thursday.

The Maine Department of Environmental Protection typically holds public meetings to weigh projects, but Commissioner Patricia Aho opted to hold a hearing in fairness to all parties and to help the agency with its process, agency spokeswoman Samantha Depoy-Warren said.

The Bowers proposal is the first to be subject to a DEP public hearing, she said.

“We apparently got a lot of requests for a public hearing,” Depoy-Warren said, “and the folks who were involved in this application [on all sides] are used to that particular process. They are familiar with it, so I expect it to go smoothly as a result.”

A First Wind subsidiary, Champlain Wind LLC, submitted a second application to build atop Bowers Mountain to the DEP in October. The second proposal features 16 turbines instead of 27, company officials have said.

The new project, company officials said, answers problems that led the Land Use Regulation Commission to reject the initial plan in April. Under the new proposal, turbines would be farther from nearby lakes. The towers would feature radar-controlled aviation warning lights to reduce light pollution and carry turbines that generate 30 percent more electricity than previous models.

First Wind of Massachusetts or its subsidiary also would create a watershed fund — money that could be used to improve the deer herd and promote local guiding and other tourism businesses, officials said.

No hearing date has been set. Depoy-Warren announced the hearing Thursday to encourage intervenors to register with the agency.

Prospective intervenors have until 5 p.m. Jan. 7 to request intervenor status in writing from the DEP. This standing allows them to be a formal party to the hearing process providing an opportunity for participation beyond what is typically availed to the general public, including the chance to present evidence under oath and cross-examine other parties, Depoy-Warren said.

A public comment period, under which people can state their opinions on the project without speaking under oath, will also be a part of the hearing.

Located east of Lee and southeast of Springfield near Route 6, Bowers Mountain is 1,127 feet. It overlooks seven lakes — including Bottle, Keg, Duck, Junior and Scraggly lakes — near the western Washington and eastern Penobscot county lines.

Its surroundings include some of the most sensitive wildlands in Maine, project critics have said. The mountain is home to many varieties of wildlife as well as thriving camping, hunting and wildlife guide industries.

About 144 residents live in the proposed host community of Carroll Plantation. Recently, 112 residents and landowners signed a petition in support of the project, company officials said.

Now called the Land Use Planning Commission, LURC voted 5-0 with little fanfare to accept a staff recommendation and reject the 27-turbine project during a brief meeting April 20 in Bangor. Commissioner Robert Dunphy abstained.

Commissioners said they were swayed by arguments that the project would have a punishing effect on nature guides and other tourism-based industries employing hundreds more indirectly.

The commission’s scenic consultant said that Champlain Wind’s consultants downplayed the project’s effect on the region. In their 27-page decision, commissioners said they relied heavily on testimony from the area’s guides that the turbines “would reduce the likelihood their clients would want to return to the area and thus [the turbines would] adversely impact their businesses.”

Anti-wind power advocates and residential groups that had opposed the project called the LURC vote their most significant win since they started fighting projects proposed by First Wind of Massachusetts about five years ago.

Join the Conversation

14 Comments

  1. BDN, once again you print whatever unnamed “company officials” at First Wind tell you instead of checking your facts.

    The fact is that the towers will NOT feature radar-controlled aviation warning lights to reduce light pollution because the FAA has not approved any such technology for wind turbines.

    How come when you write a story like this you call First Wind for comment but you never call any of the opposition groups?

    1. The FAA and the manufacturers of such radar activated lighting have confirmed that no such system has beenapproved in the US and only one test site in Canada. At best it will be several years before such technology may be approved.

  2. Here we go again! Time for all the “Flatlanders” to start crying because it will destroy their view, the hum of the blades will keep them awake, not to mention the hazards from radiation…

    1. Ahh, the old tactic of massing a diverse group under a single label in an attempt to diminish their message. Goebbels would be proud of you.

      In fact, I’m not a “Flatlander”, I’m not crying, I don’t have a view to destroy, I never mentioned turbine noise, insomnia or radiation. Other than that I guess you’re right.

    2. As a Flatlander who appreciates the beauty of ME landscapes, they’re worthy of protection in my view. Tax and ratepayers are entitled to reliable energy that is commercially reasonable, but First Wind historically provides neither-nor. You grossly underestimate the downside of wind, so I suspect you’re a shill or uninformed.

  3. It is significant that this is the first time DEP has agreed to a hold public, on-the-record hearing for an industrial wind project in Maine. Thank you to the hundreds of people who requested a public hearing. Your voices matter; and you were heard.

    1. There are a number of groups and even one in Carroll against this project ..We live here this is our lives that is being bounced around like a beach ball …and First Winds reason for proposing this is to generate Electricity For Mass not for Mainers ..ask yourself How come a mass Company can come to Maine take a crap in our back yard and don`t even give Carroll Residents enuff money out of there so called benefit package to purchase toilet paper
      ???????????????

  4. I live in Carroll Maine right across from the proposed site ..you state that 112 people or residents are for the project ….I beg to differ ..last time I counted at least 60 residents are not for the proposal including year round and non year round residents…..that 112 residents is an absolute lie …..We do not want them here

    period

  5. Very Good DEP…some of DEP rules are outdated. 2000 feet is not enough protection as Debris scatter is over 4000 feet. Sound modelings are wrong and people over a mile from turbines are complaining.
    What is the complaint protocol?
    Red flashing lights are not mentioned in original VIAs, such as Saddleback Ridge in Carthage. Please update your rules and retroact.

  6. we tried to stop DEP from permitting Oakfield with over 700 signatures and 100 letters..let’s hope the tide is changing and that this public hearing will stop the Bowers project. The DEP needs to continue to make wise decisions that will help Maine stay clean and less toxic, the fallacy of wind energy is that those machines are anything but clean and economical.

  7. First Wind builds wind projects that fail to produce energy, yet developers continue to collect public subsidies—When will this sWINDle come to an end?

    Thielen: Cable Could Cost $16B,
    Kahuku Adds to Mass of Unused Turbines Littering the Land

    SA: Harsh reality shows that modern wind power has
    been contentious throughout the world.

    Wind turbines are eyesores that often disturb the
    natural landscape, endanger wildlife and regularly need backup fossil fuel.
    Great Britain recently announced that it would halt most land-based wind
    projects.

    The situation is exacerbated in Hawaii, where wind
    energy costs range from 20 to 28 cents per kilowatt hour — more than three times
    than in California. Fires at First Wind’s Kahuku Wind Farm have led to turbines
    that do not work — adding to the mass of unused turbines that litter America’s
    lands….

    The addition of an interisland cable should also be
    cause for alarm. ABC News reported that according to the U.S. Department of
    Energy (DOE), the cost of an undersea cable is expected to be $16 billion — with
    “most” of the costs paid by the private sector.

    read … Wave power, not wind
    power, is the way to go for Hawaii

    http://www.hawaiifreepress.com/ArticlesDailyNews/tabid/65/articleType/ArticleView/articleId/8356/December-4-2012-News-Read.aspx?utm_source=December+9%2C+2012+News+From+Hawaii+Free+Press&utm_campaign=December+9%2C+2012+Email&utm_medium=email

  8. This public hearing is a huge and postitive step forward for the DEP. Maine’s environment is a huge economic asset and its protection is critical. If all these proposed projects move forward, over twelve thousand square miles of Maine’s viewsheds will be impacted. Wind sprawl is neither environmentally or ecologically “green”. The existing operational projects here in Maine are falling well below their projected power generation, are having myriad problems with their gear boxes due to the gusty and fickle mountain wind. Almost all of them are facing lawsuits from nearby residents and they should also be facing federal fines for violating the migratory bird act and the eagle protection act. Infrasound from these machines creates false radar readings and false earthquake readings and all sorts of health problems. There are no reasons to put these machines on our hills and mountains other than to pad the pockets of the wind industry. A public hearing will help bring all these facts to the table. Thank you, DEP!

Leave a comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *