ORONO, Maine — The University of Maine team working to harness the Gulf of Maine’s winds, bringing energy from the ocean to Maine’s shore, received a boost from the U.S. Department of Energy on Wednesday.
The department awarded $4 million to the Advanced Structures and Composites Center for the engineering, design and permitting phase of its offshore floating turbine project — one of seven projects in the nation selected to receive the funding. The Energy Department reviewed the proposals of more than 70 other teams that sought funding for their wind energy projects.
That initial boost could lead to a much larger award from the Energy Department, as the offshore wind energy team will move on to compete for one of three awards of up to $47 million, over four years, to help the university build and install a pair of 6-megawatt turbines off Monhegan Island by 2017, creating an operational wind farm called Aqua Ventus I. The awards from the Energy Department would be boosted further by more than $42 million in private industry investments, bringing the total that could stem from this initial award to $93 million.
“The funding announced today is the key to the ignition of one of the most exciting projects ever undertaken by the state of Maine,” said Habib Dagher, director of the composites center and the man at the helm of the offshore wind project.
“It’s a great day for the state of Maine, it’s a great day for the University of Maine and it’s a great day for everybody who worked on this proposal for the DOE,” Dagher added during a press conference Wednesday afternoon.
The Energy Department announced the competition last year as part of an effort to launch an effective offshore wind industry in the U.S., according to a department press release.
The UMaine team responded in June with a 1,200-page report highlighting its plans and the results of its research so far.
A dozen representatives from UMaine and some of the more than 30 businesses involved in the project traveled to Washington, D.C., in July, where they were questioned in a room with no windows by Energy Department officials and industry experts.
“It certainly was a frightening, stressful time for all of us,” Dagher said.
Dagher’s group was given a lengthy list of questions, which they had two hours to answer in front of a panel. After that, a group of anonymous energy experts from across the country, who watched the proceedings on a live video feed, submitted questions of their own by computer. Apparently the panel liked what it heard.
Sen. Susan Collins called Dagher on Wednesday afternoon to inform him that his UMaine team won the Energy Department award.
“This extremely important announcement is a vital step that could eventually help harness the vast potential of deepwater offshore wind energy and lead to the potential creation of some 20,000 new jobs,” Collins said.
Collins has been a staunch supporter of UMaine’s offshore wind project since its early stages, Dagher said.
“In all my years at the University of Maine, I have never seen one of our elected officials work so skillfully and tirelessly to achieve a singular goal,” Dagher said. “Sen. Collins saw what we saw — a project with potential to generate vast amounts of clean energy and to create good jobs and spark economic development — and she made it happen.”
In June 2010, Collins invited U.S. Secretary of Energy Steven Chu to the composites center to learn about the floating turbine project. Collins already had helped secure about $25 million in federal funding for the offshore wind initiative in previous years, according to her office.
Maine offshore wind efforts took two of the seven Energy Department awards. A project led by Connecticut-based Statoil North America also received an award. That group plans to deploy four 3-megawatt turbines on floating spar buoy structures off Boothbay Harbor.
After one year, the Energy Department will check back with the award recipients to see how they’ve progressed with planning, designing and permitting their projects. Based on what it finds, the department will select three of the seven to receive the larger investments to move forward with construction and installation.
A one-eighth-scale turbine is located behind UMaine’s composites center for the next couple of months to test sensors and other systems that will be used on the full-scale turbines.
After testing is completed on UMaine’s prototype, a pair of 6-megawatt turbines will be installed at the Aqua Ventus I site by 2017. By 2020, the plan is to have a larger-scale commercial wind farm with 80 turbines in a 4-by-8-mile space 20 miles offshore, over the horizon and neither visible nor audible from shore. By 2030, the goal is to have a full-scale wind farm of about 170 turbines, each taller than the Washington Monument, operational and bringing 5 gigawatts, or the equivalent of about five nuclear power plants, of wind energy to Maine’s shore.
Dagher stressed that the energy, while expensive at first, will become comparable to costs of other forms of energy — at around 10 cents per kilowatt-hour — by 2020. He said he pictures a day when cars run on and homes are heated and lit by electricity created by the strong winds just off Maine’s coast, helping to stem Maine’s dependence on foreign oil.
Maine lawmakers, including Sens. Olympia Snowe and Collins and Reps. Mike Michaud and Chellie Pingree, offered congratulations to the University of Maine and lauded the potential of the project after the announcement of the award.
“The United States has tremendous untapped clean energy resources, and it is important for us to develop technologies that will allow us to utilize those resources in ways that are economically viable,” said U.S. Secretary of Energy Steven Chu. “Today’s announcement of awards to the first offshore wind projects in the U.S. paves the way to a cleaner, more sustainable and more diverse domestic energy portfolio that develops every source of American energy.”



More wasted tax dollars to prop up an industry that is not viable or WANTED!
The Department of Energy, NREL, Sandia, and a slew of academic institutions and research programs argue otherwise. What makes an offshore wind industry not viable?
Visit here: http://energy.gov/articles/accelerating-offshore-wind-development
“Offshore wind is a large, untapped energy resource, with the potential to generate 4,000 gigawatts of clean electricity, support up to 200,000 manufacturing, construction, operation and supply chain jobs across the country and drive over $70 billion in annual investments by 2030, according to a new report commissioned by the Energy Department.”
Terrorism!
No Josh they get paid to argue otherwise. The money to be made from this is incredible.. The energy it will produce is laughable.
What data are you referencing?
effecency of these are in the low 20’s precentages. If you furnance was 20% effecent when purchased, would you buy it?
Wrong.
Wind turbines are highly efficient in converting wind to electricity.
Overall conversion efficiency for wind turbines is greater than 40% – which is as good, or better, than the most advanced combined cycle gas turbines on the market today.
Confusing wind turbine capacity factors to oil boiler efficiency is equally dumb.
People do not operate their oil furnaces 24/7 during heating season, and shut them off in the summer.
Oil furnace annual capacity factors are very low by that measure.
Wind turbines are designed to capture and convert wind energy into electricity over a wide range of wind speeds.
They do not need to have high capacity factors to generate large amounts of low cost electricity – which they do quite well.
Yessah
FULL YEAR REPORT OF WIND OUTPUT IN MAINE:
Under 25% Capacity
http://www.windtaskforce.org/profiles/blogs/full-year-report-of-wind-output-in-maine
You really don’t have a clue about how this works. You embarrass yourself by posting such drivel as conversion efficiency of wind being greater than combined cycle gas fired turbines. That is sheer fantasy. Cite your resource, as USEIA shows comparisons based on a common denominator of BTUs and wind, as always, ends up being the BIG LOSER.
Offshore turbines have a much higher “effecency.” Terrestrial turbines do much better than 20% as well
Dwight and munebaght, go to the tables that are derived from the actual data reported by the wind site operators to FERC that are at the link cited above. This is the truth, assembled by an energy market analyst. Don’t let the facts get in the way of your fantasy! http://www.windtaskforce.org/profiles/blogs/full-year-report-of-wind-output-in-maine
AHHH the magic word POTENTIAL. could, might maybe
So business as usual is good business? Should we not bother trying anything new or different, no matter how PROMISING or POTENTIALLY GREAT it could be?
It is neither good science or sound economics. Let the investors decide whether or not to pursue, not keep feeding money we borrow from China into this. If shallow off shore Block Island, using monopoles attached to the ocean floor and off the shelf technology is at a starting point of 24 cents per kwh with 3.5% annual index, I can’t imagine what the cost of floating platforms of wind turbines in the Gulf of Maine will end up being. It is not economically viable.
Yes because using a source of energy that will run out is viable.
The peak oil myth is nothing but an imature ubderstanding of our universe and the processes which formed life on ths planet. There are many astrobiologists and geologists out there who question the hypothesis of biogenic formation of fossil fuel. See Thomas Gold for starters, http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Thomas_Gold , and try reading his book “The Deep Hot Biosphere”.
Also – what’s not to want? Energy being generated out of everyone’s back yard. No emissions, no smoke stacks, and no poisoned aqueducts from fracking.
Best of all, the Gulf of Maine has one of the biggest offshore wind resources in the country. Why wouldn’t Maine want this industry? Why wouldn’t Maine want all of this electricity to sell off to other States? Why wouldn’t Maine want high quality, high paying, green technology jobs?
Is business as usual really an option?
It is not commercially viable. Why do this at upwards to 50 cents per kwh when we in Maine sit between Churchill Falls and the northeast megalopolis. Chruchill Falls is the worlds second largest hydro project and if we were smart, we would make revenue from our poor state by charging to bring that power through and secure long term power rates that could be the lowest in the northeast.
That would be quicker, easier, less costly and we wouldn’t be investing tens of billions of taxpayer money into a folly that with the next “Perfect Storm” (October 30, 31 1991) will all end up somewhere at the top end of the Bay of Fundy as wreakage. http://www.ncdc.noaa.gov/oa/satellite/satelliteseye/cyclones/pfctstorm91/pfctstorm.html
only need 1.21 gigawatts for a flux capacitor.
Every free energy device developed trom Tesla to the modern age of inventers that has been proven to work has been stolen by the Government to protect the business man. So wind is a farce because the Government hasn’t hidden it from the public.
Yup! It’s all a conspiracy; they want to build all those windmills with long blades. After a while they’re going to tie ropes around all of us and drag us out there to drown. I read about it on the internet!
Be careful not to believe everything you Read OK Larry, makes it easier to sleep at night.
Besides, they’ll put your eye out!
With that logic, you’ve established that oil and gas are also a farcical energy source. Sounds right.
How many MPGs does your car get?
Moral of the story – research is being done to improve the efficiency (both in terms of technology and cost). The percentage efficiency depends on the turbine manufacturing process, as well as the siting and other factors.
All of this is due to former UME President Bob Kennedy, who should have been present to receive cheers. Everyone else involved played a minor role. The off-shore facility should be named in his honor.
Not sure that’s completely accurate, but thanks.
With all due respect to the former president, didn’t R.k. just resign on account of a $20k+ kickback he received at his new place of employment?
Great news.
Bring it.
Yessah
Yet more millions of TAXPAYER $$$ being flushed down the drain for foolishness that isn’t economically viable at a time when we can’t balance a Federal budget for the last 4 years and we keep adding to the $16 Trillion National Debt. If we are ever going to get out of this downward spiral of deficit spending, we have to start with getting rid of spending on things that are not essential to the role of government. If there is a potential for generation of electricity in deep water, let the energy companies develop the technology and risk the investment. If the market were freed of subsidies, tax schemes, and mandates, then I believe we would see plenty of innovation grow out of old-fashioned competition.