AUGUSTA, Maine — The Maine Ethics Commission on Wednesday fined the National Organization for Marriage $2,000 for the late filing of a campaign finance report that detailed $800,000 in contributions from the Washington, D.C.-based group to the lead campaign opposing this month’s ballot initiative to legalize same-sex marriage.
The ethics commission cited the organization — which is active in campaigns opposing same-sex marriage across the country — for missing the Oct. 26 deadline for a campaign finance report by 14 hours.
“As much as we’ve had our struggles with NOM, we have to treat them fairly and consistently,” said Walter McKee, the commission chairman. “It’s a large organization, and $2,000 is in the zone.”
The Maine Ethics Commission initially levied an $8,000 penalty on the group based on penalty guidelines detailed in state election law, but commission staff members recommended a 75 percent reduction in that amount after an NOM lawyer asked for a waiver of the fine.
The fine levied against NOM doesn’t mark the first time the group has been at odds with the Maine Ethics Commission. The ethics commission and NOM became involved in a protracted court battle following Maine’s 2009 ballot initiative that overturned a same-sex marriage law passed by the state Legislature.
The organization chipped in $1.9 million for anti-gay marriage efforts that year, but didn’t disclose the source of its funds, which it had raised specifically for Maine’s ballot initiative campaign.
NOM challenged the ethics commission in federal court after the commission determined state law required the organization disclose its donors. A federal judge in 2011 upheld the constitutionality of Maine’s campaign finance disclosure laws. The U.S. Supreme Court twice this year declined to hear separate NOM appeals.
The high court’s refusal to hear NOM’s case effectively allows the Maine Ethics Commission to move forward with an investigation into the group for its 2009 activities in Maine related to that year’s same-sex marriage ballot initiative.
NOM contributed about $1 million to anti-gay marriage efforts in Maine this year. The organization, however, said it didn’t raise the funds specifically for the Maine campaign and didn’t have to disclose individual donors as a result.
In its request for a waiver of the late report penalty, a NOM lawyer said the group “made a bona fide effort to file the report on time.”
“The report was prepared in a timely fashion, but was inadvertently not submitted by oversight,” lawyer Joseph Vanderhulst wrote in a letter to the ethics commission. “As soon as the oversight was noted, the report was filed.”
Vanderhulst also argued that “there was no harm at all suffered by the public from the late disclosure” since Protect Marriage Maine, the campaign that received the contributions, already had made them public through its campaign finance reports. Ethics commission staff members agreed that the public suffered no harm from the late filing and recommended reducing the penalty.
The NOM report detailed three contributions totaling $800,000 from the national organization to its Maine political action committee, and three contributions in the same amounts from the political action committee to Protect Marriage Maine. The report also showed $111 in bank wire fees and $1,850 in unpaid obligations for legal and bookkeeping services.
Maine’s same-sex marriage initiative passed earlier this month with support from 53 percent of voters.



The side that did things right won. That is the way it should be. Sometimes life is fair!
Slimy organization they are.
Nom lost only 2 grand.Maine lost it’s morals.
Well, no worries. Your sense of indecency will never be lost.
i’d say it was NOM who lost it’s morals by disobeying the law not once, but at least twice.
No, Mainers heard from fellow Mainers over the last few years, and reconsidered the 2009 decision to revoke civil rights our legislature had granted.
Mainers did the morally right thing earlier this month. NOM on the other hand are unethical, immoral con artists who are lining their pockets by pandering to intolerant homophobes.
No, you are wrong. What is moral and ethical is treating other human beings fairly and decently. You certainly do not deserve more benefits and better treatment than they do.
Maine lost “it is” morals? Go back to school, tim.
AGAIN …. what does following the law mean to these people—- NOT much clearly
Why should they bother when they can bargain down and pay a quarter of such a small amount?I don’t recall being able to bargain down traffic tickets,etc.
Even $8000 is ridiculously inadequate. I would guess that out-of-state interests have cost Mainers many many, maybe hundreds, thousands in money. Posting rules will not allow me to say what I really think of them.
Isn’t it odd that the right who screams “transparency ” the loudest is silent here.? They think it is alright to violate state employees “privacy” with various “open gov ” sites but scream “oh no don’t reveal who WE are…. because we are sooo “scared .” Pretty pathetic and hypocritical. .
14 hours, come on. who are you trying to kid?
If you were 14 hrs. late paying your credit card bill, do you seriously think your late fee would be waived?
well since they send the bill out before your due, it is possible, one never knows. This is just pacifying a certain group I am sure. Since all the hubbub they made the last time.
$2K is pocket change for the fat cats that bankroll NOM.Even $8K wouldn’t matter to them.
Sock it to ’em.
And DON’T COME BACK! :D
The so called Maine Ethics commission is nothing but a bunch of liberal activists. Pitiful, but we should expect nothing less.
Isn’t it nice to know those supporting homosexual marriage received no financial support outside the state, took down no signs supporting traditional marriage and, of course, never intimidated school children (under 13) to promote homosexual marriage via a letter writing campaign? Hypocrites.
Charlie Webster, is that you? No? Sen. Doug Thomas? er, um….Gov. LePage?
Hypocrites! Protect Maine Marriage gets fined for their meager amounts of money from NOM when Yes on 1 had millions pouring in from out of state special interests groups and Hollywood celebrities. The homosexual agenda is too powerful.
Relax. It’s not contagious.
Nice try at spin. They were fined for failing to file the report on time, nothing else. They also contributed millions to anti-gay groups throughout the country, but were not penalized in any way for that, except THEY LOST.
The exact opposite is true— Protect Marriage Maine got the vast majority of their funding (80%+) from two sources: NOM and the Knights of Columbus, both out-of-state groups.
In contrast, the vast majority of Yes on 1’s funding came from individual Mainers donating money such as myself.
Yes, there were some large donations from out of state, but in virtually every case (such as Brad Pitt’s contribution) the large donation was set as a funding challenge— meaning the $ was only contributed as a match for other contributions received.
Mainers United for Marriage ran their campaign ethically and abided by Maine laws around fundraising— all donors names can be found in their filings. In contrast, NOM continues to flaunt Maine’s laws by keeping their donors secret.
You are a pig
There are posting rules against name calling. You will be reported.
letterreader wrote, in response to DakTo:
You are a pig
Link to comment
Legal and right, now!
No, just legal.
mathlol wrote, in response to DakTo:
Legal and right, now!
Link to comment
It’s a right, it’s right.
How mature your version of morality sounds!