PRESQUE ISLE, Maine — As spending on Maine legislative races by the state’s political parties and other third-party groups crosses the $3 million threshold statewide, a House race in Aroostook County is drawing a disproportionate amount of the attention.

The Maine Democratic Party is trying to recapture a seat it had defended in 2010 when Rep. Michael Willette won re-election to a second term. The party then lost the House District 5 seat just days after the election when Willette switched parties.

His party switch has been at the crux of Democratic opposition to his second re-election bid.

As of late Tuesday, the Democratic Party and allied groups had poured more than $32,000 into mailers, radio ads and television spots targeting Willette, according to data from the Maine Ethics Commission. Outside groups had spent more than $56,000 total on the race. Just one other House race, in Scarborough’s District 128, had attracted more outside money.

“We feel like there are many Republican incumbents around the state who are vulnerable based on the votes that took place over the past two years,” said Maine Democratic Party chairman Ben Grant. “Particularly Mike Willette, who campaigned one way and then took a 180-degree turn.”

The Maine Democratic Party first waded into the race over the summer with a series of mailers targeting Willette and promoting the Democrats’ own candidate, Robert Saucier.

Since then, the party has continued investing in the race along with two allied political action committees backed largely by unions. Citizens Who Support Maine’s Public Schools, backed by the Maine Education Association, has produced mail pieces opposing Willette although the teachers’ union supported him two years ago.

The Committee to Rebuild Maine’s Middle Class, a political action committee that formed in July largely with union support, recently spent $22,000 on a television ad targeting Willette for changing parties.

“It basically feels like we’re being invaded and the voters are being inundated with this stuff to try to sway this election,” said Willette, a Presque Isle Realtor. “They want to try to buy this seat. They want this seat to go back to the Democratic Party.”

Republicans and a handful of allied groups have responded with mail pieces and radio and online advertising in an effort to boost Willette. Republican forces had spent nearly $17,000 as of late Tuesday.

House District 5 covers part of Presque Isle. Democrat Jeremy Fischer had held the seat for three terms before Willette was first elected in 2008.

Willette said he switched parties in 2010 because he didn’t fit well in the caucus as a fiscal conservative and social libertarian. The last straw, though, was when local Democrats in Presque Isle started encouraging voters to support his Republican opponent.

“What we’re experiencing here is a carpet-bombing kind of situation from the Democratic Party,” he said. “They’re ‘teaching me a lesson’ for when I switched parties back after the 2010 election.”

While the state Democratic Party supported the then-Democratic Willette in 2010, the party this year is calling him out for running a dishonest campaign two years ago, Grant said.

“I don’t think someone who goes to Augusta to represent 6,000 people should use some petty dispute with one or two people to totally change their stripes,” he said. “If your values are subject to change based on the whims of who’s in the majority, then you’ve got to question whether that’s someone who’s been honest during the course of the campaign.”

For his part, Saucier, who recently retired from the U.S. Social Security Administration, said he’s run a quiet campaign by knocking on most doors in the district, participating in candidate forums, putting up campaign signs and producing mail pieces.

“Basically, it looks like the parties are the ones that are fighting it out amongst themselves,” he said. Regarding Willette’s party switch, he said, “There’s a lot of unhappy people.”

Both Saucier and Willette are receiving public funding under the Maine Clean Election Act, limiting their total campaign spending to about $4,400 each during the general election. Under state law, they’re barred from coordinating any outside expenditures with parties and political committees supporting them.

The House race in Scarborough that has attracted the most outside spending this election cycle pits first-term Republican Rep. Heather Sirocki against Democratic challenger Jean-Marie Caterina. As of late Tuesday, the race had attracted nearly $58,000. For context, about 8,500 people live in a Maine House district.

The Sirocki-Caterina race has landed on the radar of national Democratic organizations. Earlier this month, the Democratic Legislative Campaign Committee, a union- and business-backed group based in Washington, D.C., put the matchup on its list of 60 key legislative races in 23 states.

In September, the League of Conservation voters placed Sirocki on its nationwide “Dirty Dozen” list of state-level candidates for her voting record on environmental issues.

Join the Conversation

42 Comments

  1. Good for Mike Willette for following his conscience. Democrats love to claim money infiltrates politics to help Republicans but this is obviously not the case. They want to buy this seat and I hope it doesnt happen. 

    Keep up the great work Rep. Willette!

    1. Yes, your right.  Good for Mike to follow his conscience, a devised scheme before the election, so everyone now knows what type of a person he truly is…TurnCoat Willy.
      I wouldnt want that type of person handling my real estate investments.

      1. Your accusations are baseless and totally unfounded. Have you ever dealt with Rep. Willette and his business? This story does not say anything about any negative dealings with his business. For you to attack a small business because you do not like their politics is absolutely ridiculous.

         Why dont you go stand outside of Chic-fil-a and protest their business too. 

        1. I make no accusations and from your comments, you simply sound desperate. Actions speak loud words Downeaster. In my mind, if he knew his platform more aligned with Repubs, he should have ran as a Repub. Thats true honesty Downeaster, I want someone who is honest with me plain and simple.  Especially when dealing with something as important as investment in real estate.

          1. he did not realize what it was like going to the democrat caucus’ and dealing with some of the embicils that were in that party so after a while you just have enough. tax and spend. that is all they know how to do! just look at washington

          2. ” he did not realize what it was like going to the democrat caucus”   He didn’t?  Then where was he his entire first time?  Who did he caucus with, himself?  He changed parties immediately after the election and before the caucus or the House met.   Clearance is right, I wouldn’t want deal with him either in business.  He wasn’t honest with the voters, why would he be honest with me in business?

  2. So why has Bob Saucier been running around Presque Isle telling voters he’s basically a Republican?  Clearly trying to distance himself from the party of Portland and the radical liberal views the Democrats have adopted.  At least Mike Willette realized that a PI Dem is a far cry from an Augusta Dem, and made the switch based on principle, not party. 

    1.  If he had made the switch based on principle he would have made it BEFORE the election, not after.

  3. I’m sure it was more than a “petty dispute” that made Willette “change his stripes.”  There’s a huge difference between the way Republicans and Democrats run their caucuses.  Dems are strong-armed into voting party line, whereas the GOP is more independent.  A moderate guy like Willette is going to more easily follow his conscience as a Republican than a Democrat.  Plus, as a County D, he probably got to Augusta and thought, “who are these crazy socialists that make up most of the Maine Dem Party?”

    1.  What evidence do you have for your claim that Democrats strong arm while Republicans are more independent?

      1. Just look at the voting records of Republicans and Democrats. The Democrats vote as a block MUCH more than the Republicans. The chair of the moderate caucus in the House is a Republican. There are a number of moderates who break rank with party leadership and the governor on issues. 

        If Republicans all vote together 100% of the time then why didnt they push for a majority budget? They had control of both houses and the governorship. They could have done whatever they wanted. They compromised and they still had many moderates who did not go along with what they wanted. And was that a problem? Of course not. It is good to have differing views within a party. The Democrats did not accept that view and Rep Willette left. Good for him for sticking up for his independent spirit and leaving. 

        1. None of what you’ve said here is proof that democrats arm-twist while republican’s don’t.  You’re view on the voting habits of democrats vs. republicans has no basis in fact.  If you look at the votes of this legislature vs. those in the past when the democrats were in control, you’ll find very little difference in terms of either group voting as a block.  You may not like the democrats in the house, but at least be factually accurate with points you make against them.

        2.  To suggest that Willette left because Demorats do not accept differing views is absurd.  If that was the reason he left then why didn’t he leave before the election.  Why wait until after the election and before the House met again to change?   You can call it independant thinking but it’s nothing more than pulling the wool over the voter’s eyes. 

    2.  The GOP is more independant?  I almost chocked when I read that.  That is one of the most absurd ridiculous statements I’ve read in  long time.   If the GOP was Independant then why did they simply rubber-stamp so much of what LePage has done to ruin this fine state?
      Don’t you think it was a bit hypocritical of him to switch party 5 days after the election and not before?   In that 5 days between the election and switching I guarantee he did not get to Augusta and say what you think.  He deserves to lose simply because of his lying to the voters last time. 

        1. Really?  Let’s face it he’s simply rubber stamped almost everything of import that LePage wanted. And when he didn’t he simply did appears to simply not have voted.  Not to vote is an act of cowardace. To me however the most important thing was his betrayal of the people who voted for him.  

    1.  He could have switched parties the morning after the election results.  I guess that move would have been slightly more sinister.

  4. Mike Willette stole the seat from the Democrats when he won thanks to Democratic voters. Now that he’s up against a most worthy, respectable, and highly ethical opponent (Bob Saucier), Mr. Willette says the Democrats are trying to buy back their seat. No sir, we are not trying to buy back that seat. But we are trying to win it back fair and square. Why do I say you stole the seat? Because that’s how I felt when I voted for you as a registered Democrat and you revealed your true part affilitations after securing my vote. Fool me once shame on me…..and shame on you for doing it.

    1. You obviously never looked at his voting record. He was not a partisan Democrat, he was independent and free thinking. To say you voted for him just because of his label shows you are an ignorant voter.

    2. ethical, better dig a little deeper…. he needs to be careful with his newest commercials cause they will come back to haunt him

  5. That’s how it is with the MEA………don’t toe their line 100%, and they go for the jugular.  Cutthroat people, those teachers and their union politics………..nice on the outside, nasty on the inside (and if you’re wondering how I know, I used to be an MEA rep).

  6. Willette’s just like me: the Democrat Party left him as it lurched to the left.  We didn’t leave the Democrat Party.

    1. The same thing happened to the Republican Party, the extremist took it over, the far left grabbed the Democrat Party and us in the middle have no say.  The two major parties have everything so locked up other parties haven’t a chance.  There are few moderates elected so we have gridlock.

  7. Good for Mike Willette for following his conscience, he is a smart man and we need more like him. Shame on you Democratic party BEN GRANT wasting all that money on low down dirty immature slams. Negativity breeds negativity. Honesty WINS….GO MIKE!!

      1. I do not know Colleen and her situation, but I do know Mike and his…and I think ANY person from ANY party that WASTES that much money on negative foolishness is pretty crazy!! Why not spend all that money on positive mailings and ads for themselves?!  It’s like Mr. Grant is a teenage drama queen who is trying to bully people in believing his demented democratic mind. I am so not impressed with political bashing, sends a negative vibe to young people, and it is a vicious cycle that never ends. Grow up people…what ever happened to dignity, honesty & integrity? 

        1. So I guess we can consider both Mr. Grant and Mr. Webster petty people as they have each spent over a quarter million attacking candidates.

          1. Like I said…all of it is totally uncalled for. It is a form of BULLYING…don’t we all try to teach our children not to be bullies???  I got some of this slander mail the other day in my area and do you know what it makes me want to do…100% NOT vote for the person or persons who sent it. SO…to all the drama queen bashers whatever “party” you come from…save your precious money because like a boomerang it is all going to come back at you, and you are actually stabbing yourselves in the back :/

  8. Mr. Willette should have switched prior to his last election.  It was a false choice for people who prefer the philosophy of Democrats to Republicans.  People should ask themselves what Charlie Webster would have said if the opposite had occurred.

    1.  Charlie Webster is a pure Republican, he advised the candidates up our way not to attend a debate .  What is he afraid of??  That the people will find out that they are all bought by big business or they’re all afraid of Gov. Lapage.

  9. Well, since just about everybody claims to vote for the candidate and not the party, what difference does his changing parties make?

  10. The money spent on these ads just for the purpose of smearing Mike Willette make me sick.  They aren’t proving one point that the other candidate is more suitable for the job.  Accusing Mike Willette of being no friend to the middle class is ridiculous.  Mike and his family ARE the middle class of Maine that these ads suggest he is hindering.  And I agree, if people are more interested in who the best candidate is to represent them and LESS interested in just party promotion and agenda the switching parties should not be the focus of this campaign.  I voted for Mike Willette in the past and will again as will many of my friends and co-workers.  The man has done his job and represented PI well in Augusta.  Keep on keeping on Mike!

    1. So ruber stamping votes for LePage’s ridiculous attempt at politics is representing PI well?  Lepage could give two stinks for PI and Willete knows this.  The people of PI need to wake up and choose someone who will be present in Augusta and vote for or against measures that directly or indirectly affecet PI. Not a shadow that shows up when he wants.

  11. This article is garbage. He went where the money was. The Republicans bought him not the other way around.

Leave a comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *