By the time his police cruiser tumbled to a halt in the underbrush beside the interstate in August, the young police officer had been flung clear of the car to his death, the same fate that had been suffered by 139 other officers nationwide who were ejected from their vehicles when not using a seat belt.
Although most states’ laws require police to use seat belts, federal data show that only about half of them do, and over the past three decades, 19 percent of the officers killed in accidents were ejected from their vehicles.
“We’ve been told it’s ‘I want to be able to get out of the car quickly, it interferes with my gun or it interferes with my belt, it interferes with my driving.’ All the wrong reasons,” said Geoffrey Alpert, a University of South Carolina professor who has studied high-risk police activities for more than 25 years. “I can understand if you’re pulling up to a scene and you undo your seat belt because you want to be able to get out quickly, but not when you’re going 100 miles an hour on the freeway.”
Prince George’s County, Md., Police Officer Adrian Morris died of head injuries Aug. 20 after being thrown from his cruiser when it left Interstate 95 during the high-speed chase of a stolen car. His partner, Mike Risher, was buckled in the passenger seat. He was treated at and released from a hospital that day.
That incident came a week after a Fairfax County, Va., police officer whose name has not been released was involved in a fatal accident. A car swerved in front of his cruiser, striking it head-on. The car burst into flames, and its driver died. The officer was trapped, but he was pulled free and survived.
“Thank God he had his seat belt on,” said Capt. Susan Culin, who heads the county’s traffic division. “He’s very adamant that his seat belt saved his life.”
Seat belts and air bags have made the high-risk pursuit of criminal suspects less deadly than it once was, but for more than a dozen years, traffic fatalities killed more police officers than bullets did. The trend was reversed last year, when the number killed by gunfire — 68 — was four more than the number who died in traffic incidents.
The question of when police should chase a fleeing suspect has been debated in public and law enforcement circles for years, leading most police departments to delineate their rules. Research has shown that 1 percent of chases end in a fatality and that an officer dies as the result of a pursuit every 11 weeks.
The National Highway Traffic Safety Administration determined that 139 officers died when ejected from their vehicles in crashes between 1980 and 2008 and that only 45 percent of the 733 officers who died in crashes during the period had their seat belts fastened.
By contrast, 84 percent of all American drivers use their seat belts, the NHTSA estimates.
In Maine, the most recent documented case of a police officer who died when his cruiser crashed while he was not wearing seat belt occurred on Dec. 28, 1999, on Route 2 in Palmyra.
According to information published at the time in the Bangor Daily News, Somerset County Deputy Sheriff Charles Baker was estimated to have been driving at 90 mph when he lost control of his cruiser while on his way to assist another police officer with a possible abduction complaint. Baker was ejected from the vehicle when his cruiser skidded off the roadway and rolled several times in an adjacent field.
A subsequent investigation into the accident revealed that Baker was not wearing a seat belt at the time of the accident.
Police officials in Maine contacted this week could not remember any fatal accidents involving police officers who weren’t wearing seat belts since Baker’s death. Stephen McCausland of Maine Department of Public Safety and Sgt. Garry Higgins of Bangor Police Department each said that it is the policy of their departments for all officers to fasten their seat belts when they get behind the wheel. Most departments in Maine are believed to have formally adopted this policy when wearing seat belts became required by state law in 1995.
According to the website Officer Down Memorial Page, 86 law enforcement officers in Maine have died in the line of duty since 1808. Among the causes of the officers’ deaths listed on the website are heart attack, gunfire, assault and being struck by a vehicle. Sixteen of those deaths involved police cruiser accidents, all of which happened before 2000.
Three fatal cruiser accidents listed on the website, including Baker’s, involved officers who were ejected from their vehicles. Information about whether seat belts factored into the two other such accidents listed on the website, which happened in the 1960s in the towns of Ripley and Newport, could not be tracked down this week.
In Prince George’s County, Md., the importance of law enforcement officers using seat belts is stressed in the annual in-service training, a portion of which is devoted to safe driving, police said.
Kevin Davis, the county’s assistant police chief, said the educational effort is essential to changing the way officers think about using their seat belts.
“You can change any policy and procedure that you want to change, reduce it to writing and stick it in your 400-500 page general order manual, but you’re not making any headway unless you change the culture,” Davis said.
He calls the three reasons most officers give for eschewing the seat belt — it gets tangled with their gun belt, it delays their exit from the car and it hampers their ability to dodge a bullet — “absolutely absurd.”
“It’s a bunch of garbage, and I just don’t buy it,” he said.
When officers get older, gain more experience and, particularly, when they start a family, they begin to see the wisdom of seat belt use, Davis said.
In addition to culture change, more training and new policies, Davis said the department plans to hold district commanders responsible for ensuring that their officers get the message.
“As long as it remains on their daily radar screen, we think that that will be half the battle in changing the culture about wearing seat belts in a police car,” Davis said, adding that punishment for officers should be greater than the current written reprimand. “That, arguably, doesn’t go far enough to modify someone’s behavior.”
Alpert said he has seen the influence of the Prince George’s efforts.
“I was at the Prince George’s County [police department] the other day, and there’s a sign as you leave the parking lot, ‘put on your seat belt on,’ something to that effect,” Alpert said. “They do have a policy. They’re very concerned about it. But I’ve seen officers elsewhere wear their seat belt off the lot, then take if off and click it behind because they think they can do their jobs better” if they don’t wear a seat belt.
Culin said Fairfax County police parking lots have similar signs. She said the department launched a buckle-up campaign after a visual survey found that 25 percent of officers were not wearing seat belts.
Even after an effort that included reminders at every shift roll call, she said 21 percent of officers continued to ignore the pleas.
“It’s changing human behavior, and that’s very difficult to do,” she said. “It’s something we have to keep harping about with the officers. It’s a real issue. It’s an issue here, and it’s a pressing issue nationwide.”
The roll call of officers who weren’t wearing seat belts when they died in crashes includes Louisiana Deputy Sheriff Randall Benoit, 41, who was hit from behind this year on a state highway. Another local Louisiana officer, John Kendall, 64, was ejected from his cruiser four months earlier after he hit a pickup truck.
The last officer to die in the line of duty in Prince George’s before Morris, Thomas Jenson, was not wearing a seat belt in 2010 when his cruiser skidded on a patch of ice and hit a pole.
“A seat belt absolutely would have saved his life,” Davis said.
That year, Houston officer Eydelman Mani, 30, was responding to a call at 60 mph when his patrol car hit a guardrail. A New Jersey officer, John Abraham, 37, died when his cruiser hit a utility pole in Teaneck.
An officer with the Bureau of Indian Affairs, Joshua Yazzie, 33, was hurled from his patrol car when it rolled off an embankment on a Ute reservation in Utah.
St. Louis Police Chief Dan Isom mandated strict enforcement of the department’s seat belt requirement after two officers who weren’t wearing them — Julius Moore, 23, and David Haynes, 27 — died in crashes within five months.
The events leading to Morris’s death in Prince George’s unfolded as things often do in routine police work. He and Risher were investigating a car break-in at a Laurel gas station when a silver Acura linked to the break-in passed by.
With overhead lights flashing, they pursued the car onto I-95. Chasing at high speed, Morris lost control of the cruiser and it tumbled into a ravine. He was thrown from the car and suffered fatal head injuries.
“I think he wasn’t wearing his seat belt because of the excitement of the moment, of seeing a bad guy from a parking lot,” Davis said. “He just forgot. From what I understand, he was a religious seat belt wearer.”
Bangor Daily News writer Bill Trotter contributed to this report.



Buckle up, good buddy.
Seatbelts save lives.
Click it or ticket !
They also kill others.I watched two people die because the car was upside down and they could not get them unhooked,They burned to death when it ignited.But we dont ever bring those things up at all.
No those situations don’t count.
How many times have we all seen a police cruiser on a rainy day without headlights on? It’s the law.
Or turn signals !!
Remember 10 and 2.
Maybe their drunk, or headed to counsel young men in a remote parking lot?
Brewer PD.
Or on a cell phone, or reading an on board computer, perhaps even typing on the on board computer while driving. Or going 55 MPH in a 45 zone and not responding? If they are upholding laws, they should set the example, not be the exception. 8 years ago yesterday, my son and another were killed in an accident, they both had their belts on: that’s an exception. Police not following the laws that they daily enforce for whatever reason, seems trivial and dangerous compared to my son’s accident.
Let the LEO bashing begin.
I won’t bash but..I very seldom see a cruiser/police car use a turn signal for turns or lane changes; we (the public) are required to do so.
we (the public) are required to use a turn signal when it alters the
flow of traffic. How often are you following a cruiser close enough that
his turn is going to affect how you’re driving?
I was really writing about what I see while walking. But, when driving who can keep up with a cruiser or patrol car, WE have speed limits.
Not them though
You can keep whining about little non-issues with LEO driving but the fact of the matter is if you needed one you wouldn’t be asking them if they followed all the rules of the road you’d probably be asking what took them so long.
As it should be.
One winter afternoon while driving through Belfast my car was struck broadside by a fire engine that ran a stop sign and crossed Route One— on the way home from a fire. My passenger and I pinwheeled two or three times before ending up in the median strip. Although I arrived at the gig late, I played for a dance that evening at the Camden Legion — probably only because our seatbelts were securely fastened to a steel Saab frame.
We read that more than 70 percent of the 1,020 people killed in crashes on Alabama roads in 1996 weren’t wearing seat belts. No surprise when Alabama is proud to have one of the lowest rates of seat-belt usage in the nation.
Driving a truck or police car without wearing a seatbelt is a macho thing. Boasting to your buddies at the loading dock about never wearing a seatbelt characterizes a certain segment of our society. If you think about it, you might realize that the people you know who refuse to wear seatbelts hate the guvmnt.
The humble Farmer
More likely to be a kid who still thinks he’s bulletproof or a “rebel” trying to prove to himself that he’s too important to have to abide by the rules. Sort of like motorcycle riders who refuse to wear helmets and come up with all sorts of lame excuses why. Whatever their political affiliation, I consider it’s a healthy thing for society in general, Darwinism at work.
Nope 65 never worn one never will.
Kiss that theory good-bye
there’s still time….
WWhy?
New Hampshire (the only State without an adult seatbelt law) has the second lowest per mile fatality rate in the Nation.
Because wearing a seat belt you are more likely to get into a serious accident in the first place. How many innocent people are killed in other care because of it ? lets say it in 1 but it saves 200 lives of people driving. I would be so against making that law to wear them. Your choice driving .
but it does confirm the theory that you cannot cure stupid.
Sometimes I wear it, sometimes I don’t. All of the statistics point to the fact that seat belts save lives much more often than not, but nobody will ever convince me that it shouldn’t be my choice, and my choice alone.
I agree that it should be your choice, but since, as you point out, it’s safer to wear one, i fail to understand why any rational person would choose to not wear one. Its also your choice to point loaded gums at yourself, but why would anyone do that?
You’re absolutely right. I’m just a huge proponent of individual choice, even the choice to be an irrational person, as long as that choice isn’t putting somebody else in harm’s way.
you want to hope you dont get pinned in your car and have it ignite.with a seatbelt you cant unhook. I have seen this happen.
Goldwing, think here for a moment, how many times have you read about someone being ejected from a vehicle? How many times have you read that someone has been pinned in a burning car? The ejection scenario is just so much more common.
I have personally seen an infant trapped in the back of a burning car. I remember clearly using a pair of scissors that I always keep in my car to cut his belt, while another bystander sprayed us both with my fire extinguisher which I also always keep in my car. I had replaced that fire extinguisher only the day before. There was a solution for the jammed belt, there would have been none had the car landed on top of the baby.
Its not the Gov. we don’t like . Its the politicians . The Gov is the people . Politicians are the one we don’t like.
yup but some of those workers for the goobermint are just as dumb as the politicians :-/
Humble Farmer . Theres nothing humble about you
That’s humble Farmer there fella.
I’m not of the opinion that the average officer believes that they are above the law. Perhaps when they leave the station they are preoccupied with the task at hand. Today’s patrol vehicles look like a space ship inside-maybe to the point that lights are not switched on at dusk-or light turned on when it’s raining. I see that on the Bar Harbor road quite often.
Maybe they should make it that the lights come when you start the car like mine dose
You have Day Time Running lights- right? You would think a car equipped with a Police Package would have the same lights as you. However ou can’t turn them off on some cars-not good for some police situations.
I totally agree with staement.
Wouldn’t do much for the speed traps, would it?
I was caught speeding in Conn. and the police where on the side of the highway at night with parking lights on.As they should be.
if by the side of the highway you mean the breakdown lane, police should never be sitting in the breakdown lane running radar. it’s a hazard that could be fatal to the officer or the public.
I have complained about this to the police in the past, and I have never seen them in the breakdown lane running radar after that.
They shouldn’nt be able to turn them off till the engine is turned off.
My old grand am had automatic lights that came on. Yes I had daytime running lights but my night driving lights would turn as also. It did not turn on the license plate light on unless you manually turn lights on. My new car I have now has daytime running lights that shut off while in park
DRL’s are not enough to comply with the law. Your taillights don’t come on.
These patrol cars are new in that the head lights should be on at all times.They should come on as soon as the engine is started.
i drive ambulances and fire trucks and am very busy mentally when driving to an emergency, but the FIRST thing we do after sitting in the seat is buckle up. the drivers seat is the safest position in any vehicle and seat belts keep your butt where it belongs, in the seat. i’ve told my passengers that maybe they don’t like seatbelts, but i don’t like the idea of their 200 lb body being thrown around in my cab during a wreck beating me to death. the national fallen firefighters foundation pays the family of a deceased firefighter $200,000.00 for a line of duty death, but pays nothing if you are found to have not been wearing your seatbelt. maybe some super-macho firefighter passenger doesn’t feel he should have to wear his belt, so i tell him “what about your family? don’t you care about them if you die?” at my departments, if you won’t buckle up, the truck stops or never rolls and macho man gets out. go home tough guy, you’re not needed on the fireground.
Not really.. just another example of cops being no smarter than ordinary folks.. or maybe not so much.
ok..buckle up..no matter what..cops are here to serve and protect, and no matter how dangerous the situations/emergancy can be…ya aint gonna do anyone any good, if you die trying to save them, with no belt..why die trying to save someone else..you have to care for “YOU” first..Sad to read about all the deceased officers that could have maybe survived.
The crime here is that the nanny State thinks it should be able to tell adults (with some experience I might add) how to run their lives.
I know the argument is that all you poor taxpayers pay for my repairs if I am damaged. Well, I didn’t ask you to. I didn’t ask for health insurance paid for by the state anymore than I asked for garbage collection paid for by the town. I was perfectly happy taking my own trash to the dump, and paying my own health care premium until you do-gooders came along and told me I was doing it all wrong.
Take your seat-belts and nanny ideas and shove them.
Agreed on seat belts and garbage collection. You forgot riding in the back of a pickup. However, what’s in Obamacare that says you can’t pay your own health care premium? Last I checked the basic concept was to make it mandatory if you could afford it.
Mandatory to go into the homogenized bottle where those who can affort it must pay for those who can not, therefore giving people like Ray’s Girl (above) ammunition for her agrument that everyone needs a nanny.
It’s like Orwell, and no one seems to notice:
You must register for our national health care plan….
…. and because you are in OUR plan, you must wear seatbelts because you cost us money when you don’t becaause you are in the plan.
Since we all pay for auto insurance, if you get injured, my rates will go up too. I don’t care to pay for your carelessness. If you get thrown out of your vehicle and it comes careening at my car, who is going to stop it. Oh yeah, not you. We all have to share the roads and as such we have a duty to be as safe as possible on them. If people would use common sense to keep themselves safe, we wouldn’t need the government to make it a law.
No seat belt? No insurance coverage. This would get people to get with the program.
Then refund my premiums .
Are we going to not pay for this officers so called bad choice? I dought it.
Bull .I pay my own auto insurance, health insurance and home owners ,Take you own chances and pay the price yourself
When I was in an accident, suffering only minor injuries because I had my seat belt on, the ER charges ate up most of what my car insurance covered for injuries. I had x-rays, a head CT, and treatment for a fractured hand and assorted bruises. Because the car had rolled and I hit my head several times, I was observed for a concussion etc. My health insurance covered the difference.
My point here is, if someone suffers extensive injuries as a result of not wearing the seat belt, those injuries are covered under auto insurance, then health insurance. The higher the costs, the more insurance pays and ultimately everyone is paying with higher premiums.
…
Holy Mackerel some one that feels the same as I do,Thank you Tux.
You’re confusing rights with privileges driving is a privilege not a right and it is regulated.
Cops breaking the law?? Who knew?
I know right? As a former claims adjuster for auto, I can verify that seatbelts save lives and those who do not where them put others in danger as well by not being in control of their vehicle if tossed around in it. While I would not want anyone to perish horribly, they are taking their lives, and others’ lives in their hands when they make a choice not to wear a seatbelt.
I survived a very violent rollover accident because I was wearing my seatbelt. I am pretty sure that without the use of the belt that day, I would have made my kids orphans. How irresponsible would that have been? I brought those kids into the world. I have an obligation to take care of them, and taking care of myself is part of that obligation. Many cops are parents too, so they have the same obligations to their families that I have to mine. They can release their belts just prior to arriving at a call so as not to entangled or delayed. There are few calls that require exiting a vehicle that quickly and they know what those calls are so they can be sure to be untangled.
The rest of us have the same obligation. Wear the belt. If you are ejected in an an accident, the odds of a heavy vehicle landing on you at some point is great. You don’t stand a great chance of surviving that at all, but certainly not without some very serious injury. The outcome of a vehicle landing on a human is always ugly.
I used to be lazy about putting my seat belt back on if I had removed it, which was the case the morning my car rolled. I am so glad I took the extra five seconds it took me to stop, and fasten the belt.
I am sitting here now with my beautiful first grandchild, something I could have missed due to a moment’s carelessness.
YAY!!! Glad you used your seat belt and survived :) You did everything you could in the event of the impossible. You survived are here for your family. Kudos to you for safety :)
Your pretty sure?
Sure I survived? Yup, I am pretty sure. Oh, wait, did you mean the seat belt saving me?Let’s look at it this way. My first roll was apparently off a parked car and according to witnesses I rolled twice more after that. Given the state of the inside of the car, with items that had been secured, scattered everywhere, there is little doubt in my mind that I would have been ejected without the seat belt. Sometimes people are thrown safely clear, but years of medical experience tell me that is not the norm. Ever see someone after a one or two ton vehicle has rolled over them? Not pretty.
I hope you do not drive a bike .
How many people die with them on. Oh no,we dont ever talk about that.
Personally, I would rather be wearing my seat belt and be trapped or die IN my vehicle. Your odds are much greater to survive than to be hurled from your vehicle.
Statistically more people survive by wearing seatbelts. There, we just talked about it.
i have seen people dead who were wearing seatbelts. they were either 90+ years old with internal trauma or torn to pieces in a wreck that no one could survive.
HMMMMMMMMMMMMMMM thought seatbelts saved lives
You are about 1 % to 2% more likely to get into an accident in the wearing a seat belt . Yes they may save lives . Do not forget the people who drop there smoke and a seat belt make is have for them to pick up. Please stick to the facts. people feel more secure . More likely to drive to fast for road conditions etc. Wearing a seat best.
I will ignore that your claims sound ridiculous at best as 1 to 2 % is negligible statistically. What is proven is that IN THE EVENT OF AN ACCIDENT, you are more likely to survive vs die if you are wearing a seatbelt. Those are the facts bro.
I agree . You can not tell me people do not drop a lighted smoke in there lap while driving . Having a seat belt on for those not use to it dose not help. An alcoholic is more likely to get into an accident in the first year of quitting drinking than if they kept drinking also. I see the world much differently. Yes seat belt do save lives.
Yes they do. Are we done yet?
So you agree haha thank’s
I don’t wear the seat belt. I have always driven big vehicles and my brand new Suburban XL is loaded with airbags. Sure seat belts are safer and I ‘m not going to argue that but it should be our choice and to me it is. I will take the penalty. The thing is, I have waved at law enforcement officers and never have been pulled over for not wearing one. Ever.
So was the brand new pick up a young man was driving around here a couple of years ago. He didn’t put his seat belt on and was driving at a high rate of speed when he missed the curve. He was ejected and his truck landed on top of him. His air bags had deployed and did him no good at all, under the truck. He was declared dead at the scene.
All the more reason we should probably ban cars, guns, alcohol, boats, motorcycles (what is more dangerous, a motorcycle or me in my SUV without a seat belt, mmm) and any other thing that might cause harm. How on earth did the greatest generation ever survive without such nanny laws? Amazing.
seat belt laws were lobbied for by insurance companies…so they had another way to deny your claim. congress couldn’t wait to give them a little more power over us. NH said “Hell, NO”.
Well, not exactly…NH said anyone under 18 must wear a belt, but presumably if you’re an adult capable of making informed decisions you can make the choice yourself. When I hit the NH line, the belt comes off.
Have you ever noticed that when an accident is reported, the author never tells readers when seat belts have been used when there’s a death, but never fail to tell you when they weren’t used? I’m thinking of the case just a few days ago when an 80-something YO woman here in Maine died in a car fire because rescuers/good samaritans couldn’t get her out.
I will say this to all of you.If we did not drive cars and trucks,not a single person would get killed in them any way at all.
His choice
So let me get this straight….we are paying their salaries to write us tickets for laws they are breaking themselves? Not to mention, we pay their insurance, their workers comp and their death benefits through our taxes. Buckle up and stop wasting my money on preventable injuries and accidents!
And we will pay their benefits all the same.
I was stopped last week ( for another issue) and the first thing the officer asked me was why my seat belt was not buckled. It had been, I unbuckled it to reach for my purse to extract my license, he accepted that. I wonder if he had been wearing his?
Do away with the seatbelt law. (yea I Know before you all lambast me, it saves lives. Though it does kill a few)
You are a smart person. They kill alot of good people.
Interesting. I’ve seen cruisers with the belt wrapped around the back of the seat and clicked in so it doesn’t go BONG BONG BONG BONG. How can a cop not wear a seatbelt, but summons somebody for the same? Their excuses are no different than a “civilians” excuse of getting trapped by a seatbelt.
A guy I know was pulled over a few days ago for driving in the rain with no headlights on. He used his camera phone and took a picture of the cruiser…..with no headlights on.
A cop can drive at high rates of speed when it’s not necessary, but a “civilian” can’t.
Double standards is all it boils down to.
Just FYI, nearly all vehicles sold to law enforcement agencies have the ding, ding seatbelt warning annunciator disconnected, as are the “headlights always on”, and the key in the ignition annunciator.
Don’t want to announce their presence with a whole bunch of ding, ding, dings going off and headlights on when doing the sneaky pete.
The police should follow traffic laws…..the same ones they would pull us over for not observing.
Just had one die here in MD, the car was almost cut in half, length ways.. Speeding…He must off been going pretty fast…And no seat belt…
Bummer being them
the police in this state believe they are “above the law”…talking on cell phones/texting. see it everyday in DEXSTER
But you dont break any laws do you????????????????????????????????????
i honestly try to break every law i can!
A few more question marks and I think your point would have really hit home.
We all know how important they are, that’s why we have them in our school buses, protecting our most precious Children. The fines help our corrupt Courts function.
Let’s see ……………………………. by law I have to strap myself in a vehicle (tin can) with a seat-belt but can get out, hop on a 2 wheel open motorcycle and head down the “SAME” road withOUT a helmet ………………………. ya, really makes sense.
The answer is obvious. Re-enact a mandatory helmet law.
I read that 95% of all accidents occur within 3/4 of a mile of your home.
I park a mile away.
So why dont the police get fighter jet release belts? A slap to the chest and it releases. Nothing to fight other than a mental restriction.
It is the donuts, time that gut flows out to the steering wheel,there ain’t no room for a seat belt, what ya try to do, why these cops couldn’t get their breath, restricted with a silly seat belt.
I do not mind if a cop chooses not to wear their seat belt, as long as they do not summons others for doing the same. I personally wear mine. My first job was an ambulance attendant and I had a front row seat in the seat belt debate back in the late 70’s. There really is no good argument against them. Try and catch a NASCAR driver not wearing one.
…
Bull, it’s just another excuse for the state to steal our money with fines! Anyone over the age of 18 should have the right to choose whether to wear a seat belt or not. We don’t have many rights left as we now live in a form of Dictatorship run by a money grubbing Government, greedy insurance and petroleum companies who make the rules and force them down our throats, they run every aspect of our lives! Welcome to the new America where only the wealthy have rights and are equal!
Having been on both sides of the argument, I can only offer my own perspective. As a former fighter pilot, we were strapped in with shoulder harness and lap belt, among other attachments, before ever starting the engines. That became habit before the mandatory seat belt laws were enacted.
In a car/truck today, I strap in before ever turning the key.
And in law enforcement, it was a no brainer. Strap in, and unhook prior to arrival at a scene which would necessitate an immediate egress from the unit.
And on a last note, I am alive today because of a three point restraint system and air bags. They work and there is NO viable excuse not to wear them.
I’m sure the cops issue themselves tickets for not wearing seat belts.
They think they’re above the law.
And just watch them yakking on a cell phone while driving, not using turn signals, no headlights on in the rain etc.
If they don’t want to wear them, it’s THEIR choice [to die].
One problem with seat belts is that there is no standard release mechanism. Some of them have a button release on the front, some on the side, some a slide release on the side & others a lift release. I have seen people have trouble unbuckling them because they are not used to a different release mechanism. I have also had some seat belts not respond to the release mechanism, which could be a danger in an emrgency.
As far as police officers not wearing them, their excuses are no different than those offered by the general public when the laws were enacted. They should be setting the example for the public, whether it be wearing seat belts, not using cell phones/texting, obeying speed limits, traffic lights, stop signs, or no turn on red signs. I have even witnessed a police officer making a left turn on red. They should be held to a higher standard as they are sworn to uphold the law.
These guys risk getting shot in the face every time they pull someone over. Their presence on the road is more important than yours, they probably drive more miles a day than you, and have seen enough blood and death to know the perils of not wearing a seatbelt. If they don’t want to, then who cares. These guys deserve more respect than you’re giving them.