LINCOLN, Maine — A teachers union attorney declared victory Thursday with an arbitrator’s decision that overturned a three-day suspension of a second-grade teacher at Ella P. Burr School that occurred a year ago.
“It is a 100 percent win. We could not have asked for anything more than we received,” Maine Education Association trial counsel Howard Reben said. “The decision fully vindicated [second-grade teacher] Jodi Bisson and awarded her all of what she sought.”
The school system’s attorney, meanwhile, said the 43-page decision showed that Sarah Kerr Garrity of the American Arbitration Association believed that Bisson had made contact with a student’s hand — even if Garrity believed the discipline Superintendent Denise Hamlin pursued was too harsh.
“There is no question that there was a physical interaction between a teacher and a student in the classroom. There were varying accounts” of the incident, RSU 67 attorney Harry Pringle said, but “the superintendent’s most important responsibility is to protect students.”
Hamlin and the RSU 67 board of directors suspended Bisson for three days on Oct. 7, 2011, in response to the incident on Sept 21, 2011, and another incident in which Bisson supposedly threatened another student. Bisson also was transferred to another school and lost a leadership stipend she had received.
Saying that the board and Hamlin had failed to prove that any disciplinary action was warranted against Bisson, Garrity directed that all mention of the suspension be purged from Bisson’s personnel records. Bisson should also be reimbursed the lost pay and stipend, Garrity wrote. The transfer was allowed to stand.
And Garrity suggested that it was “quite possible” that the complainant, Linda Dunn, who witnessed Bisson’s interaction with the student, misinterpreted the incident as something harmful.
Conflicting testimony collected during the union-board hearing and arbitration process stated that Bisson, a 21-year teacher who had no prior disciplinary issues and regularly received very positive performance reviews, had slapped or tapped a male student on the hand during a money-counting math exercise on Sept. 21, 2011, Garrity’s decision states.
Dunn, a math interventionist who had worked for the regional school unit for a few weeks, reported the incident two days later. Dunn said she was “horrified by what she saw” and that the slap was loud enough to be heard several feet away, the decision states.
The mother of the student who was struck and Burr’s principal, Rachel Bousquet, both cried when they saw the student’s re-enactment of the incident, the decision states.
In a written statement she prepared in response to the allegations, Bisson described the touching incident as a joke. She said she touched the student’s hand and told him, “Get your grubby hands off my money!”
“The students laughed and we continued playing,” Bisson wrote.
Dunn said the subsequent isolation and pressure she endured to recant her story at the hands of teachers and others eventually motivated her to leave Lincoln, the decision states.
Dunn also reported another incident in which she said that Bisson told another male student who was fidgeting, “If you do not stop kicking me I will break your leg and use it to hit you on the head.” The student seemed scared, Dunn said.
Bisson didn’t confirm making that statement, but said it “sounded like something she would say” — but only as a joke, the decision states.
Several other teachers, aides and two former principals described Bisson as a teacher beloved by her students and one who liked to joke with them.
“More than one witness described this kind of comment as typical of [Bisson’s] teaching style,” Garrity wrote, “yet she has never been told by any administrator, during her 21-year employment, that she should tread more lightly in teasing or joking with her students.”
“Not everyone sees humor in the same interactions and it [misinterpretation] is certainly possible” given Dunn’s lack of familiarity with Bisson’s teaching style, Garrity wrote.
When the incidents occurred, Dunn had been working for the school system only for a few days. And the mother of the boy whom Bisson touched later discussed the incident while at home with her son and became convinced that he was not slapped. The boy’s father agreed, the decision states.
A prohibitive practice complaint filed by the union against the RSU 67 administration arising partly from Bisson’s case is still pending with the Maine Labor Relations Board, both sides state.



Good for you Jodi!
Frightening accusations from the new hire, Dunn.
While only being on the job a few days this woman
sets in motion a whole tidal wave of fear, misunderstanding and hurt
over something she clearly misinterpretated and did not fully
understand.
This is so sad on so many levels.
I hope for all concerned that any future employers of Ms Dunn
be apprised of what she instigated and the great expense she put
all involved through.
Best to all the students and remaining staff at the school.
The student and teacher knew each other well and could joke around. Political correctness sucks. Ms Dunn, You are unqualified for that job.
The sad thing about this story is that there’s not a darn person from one end of the spectrum to the other involved in this story that will learn any kind of lesson from this experience. In a nutshell that pretty much sums up what education in general is all about these days.
I am glad that she got this overturned. It was a huge mess from day one and she was treated extremely unfair by the superintendent and the principal of her school.
Ms. Dunn worked at the school for a few short days and immediately made an accusation when she truly knew nothing about the teachers she was working with. Her false accusations changed a teacher’s life and family in a very negative way. A great teacher like Mrs. Bisson was treated horribly and deserves an apology from Ms. Dunn, the principal of Ella Burr, and the superintendent of schools.
I doubt that the superintendent or principal will apologize, but hopefully Ms. Dunn will be woman enough to do so.
Don’t hold your breath waiting for that apology.
What is going on with this district? Sounds like most everyone working there is miserable. People get it together because this is not helping kids with added stress levels. They cannot even pass a budget for this year and now the town is looking into a huge deficit. There are going to have to be cuts all around. The town is in for a rough ride.
My High School English teacher (God rest her soul) would be furious over what the modern day schools have turned into.
We mis-behaved in class, we got whacked with whatever might be in her hand. She would give a warning or two, then watch out.
I think that I turned out just fine. And I still respect her to this very day.
Can you say “Nanny State”…………….
Fifteen years ago, my sons Kidnergarten teacher hugged him! Was I mortified? “N O” it made me feel like someone cared. I just asked the teacher how she dare do that and she replied, “if people don’t like it let them fire me”! She and I went on to discuss how children are missing attention at home and all they want is to feel wanted and to have a sense of belonging. Nine years ago, my other son had Mrs Bisson and she was one of his favorite teachers. My son liked to joke, was very comfortable in her classroom and to this day he mentions that she “understood” him. He enjoyed school and looked forward to learning. I understand people being skiddish in todays’ society with all the freaks out there but sometimes you have to act not react. I doubt too many of us in our 40s or 50s had to seek out counciling for a spanking or sharp words spoken to us as a child. Like Mikey, I have tremendous respect for those that put me in my place, when I misbehaved as a kid.
“I doubt too many of us in our 40s or 50s had to seek out counciling for a spanking or sharp words spoken to us as a child.” Not when we were at fault, no. 61 here, and, looking back, I was mostly unhappy at being caught misbehaving. I never thought the teacher was wrong.
I have 2 questions:
1. Did Superintendent Hamlin and Linda Dunn know each other before her appointment to Mrs. Bisson’s classroom?
2. Was it revealed in testimony that Superintendent Hamlin made her brags to some people about how she was going to remove Mrs. Bisson from the school, before this incident even happened?
Obviously, I know the answers to both questions. Others need to know the answers, too.
The day after this verdict came out, the school board did the superintendent’s evaluation (2 months early) and gave her a $3000 raise and extended her contract for 2 more years. In 2 short years, Denise Hamlin has completely ruined what used to be a very good school district, not to mention the lives of many people who have tried to stop her. Start digging for information, citizens of RSU 67. Get rid of this woman before she does damage that cannot be fixed.
Imagine the money expended in this situation: outside counsel for the teacher; attorney for the school board; $2,000-a-day or more for the arbitrator (split between the parties); subs for witnesses; and maybe more. And all over a 3-day suspension that could easily have been fixed at the earliest stages of the grievance. A 45-page arbitration award isn’t cheap.
It’s the school board/superintendent who drive this process; all they had to do was work with the local Association, not merely keep saying “[ha-ha] Grievance denied.”
Maybe this mother and principal should be crying about the kids not learning more than they do instead of worryimg about taps on the hand.
I can tell you the taps on the hand I received, with a 15inch ruler, would have been heard in the next room, notjust a few feet away.
Parents you better be demanding your teachers can teach instead of wasting everyones time over stuff like this.
I have to chuckle because the way it was written in the paper, it sounds like the mother was crying BECAUSE her child was “hit” on the hand and that couldn’t be further from the truth…she was upset BECAUSE of the mistreatment of Jodi. There are few misinterpretations in this article but the overall outcome is JODI WON AND THE SUPERINTENDENT LOST!!! Bottom line…
Thank you for the clarification. I am quick to jump on parents for having the wrong priorities when it comes to their children’s education.
Congratulations to Jodi!! A dear friend who has been 100% vindicated!! If anyone took the time to dig up the article written by the BDN on May 15, 2012 about this arbitration, you will see Mrs. Hamlin’s quote which is this, “she said she was confident that the accusations would prove to be “frivolous and thinly-veiled attacks on the superintendent and school board. We are confident that when the facts of the matter are presented they will be seen for what they are.” Well, folks she did get ONE thing right, “when the facts of the matter are presented they will be seen for what they are”!!!! THE TRUTH….Now, with that being said, the board still hands her a raise and and extension for being a bully to her staff!!! Because lets face it, her actions against Jodi were actions of a bully. Now, the MEA still has a lawsuit against her for violating 18 PPC’s pending the outcome of this arbitration. I have been told the MEA will move forward with their lawsuit since much of the violations were stemmed from Jodi’s case; however, I have not verified this information. How can the board hand her a raise and and extension with that in the wings and the outcome of the arbitration? I can tell you this, the current board felt the need to move DH’s evaluation up two full months. Why? There are 3 seats up for renewal in November, one of which is the chairperson who seems to think until DH’s arrival this district was and I quote her words from Wednesday’s board meeting, “3 ships in the ocean and heading toward 3 different ports until DH, and now it seems those 3 ships are all heading in the same direction”. In my opinion, I believe the board wanted to evaluate her BEFORE the election knowing how those who are running for those 3 seats feel about DH. Sneakiness at it’s best!!!
Well I guess the chairperson was right a bout one thing, all three ships are heading in the same direction….. RIGHT DOWN HILL. All three of my kids have had her for a teacher and we all love her.
Finally , the reason for the “situation” that created so much interesting reader comment banter over the past year. WOW.. such a small incident to have turned into such a big fire storm, and to have changed so many lives.. HOW many teachers have left this district as a result of this superintendents practices? Its hard to keep track through the reader comments… and as I understand it the budget has yet to be passed and seems to be some sort of hold out to punish the superintendent….. all very interesting for those of us from afar…
57 people no longer work for our district JUST in the last 18 months! IF things don’t change quickly, I predict many more! Two weeks till school started and there were still 11 (I’m not 100% on this figure but it’s pretty close) positions still open. AUGUST is NOT the typical time to hire for schools. That usually takes place in the spring. I HOPE we got quality employees, please do try to misrepresent me by saying anything else…BUT did we get THE BEST????? Maybe????
This is why young people thinking about a career in education may not want to spend $100,000.00 for a position that pays around $30,000.00 to start.The return on investment is often having your good name dragged through the mud. Anything you do in your classroom can turn into a fiasco these days. I’d not advise any young person to work in the public arena.
and the sad thing is, even though this teacher’s lawyer is asking for all record of this suspension to be expunged from her personnel file, it is almost irrelevant (at least for future employment).
Any employer (school or otherwise) could easily do a google search, and this article will be at the top of the search results. This incident is in the BDN and is out there on the internet forever, somewhere. That is unfortunate for this teacher. Even though she was vindicated, the next school district, if there is one, may still decide to not hire her.
Hopefully a perspective employer will read the whole story.
Ever-since that tool of a superintendent took her post RSU 67 the district has lost some great teachers. RSU 67 was once a great district, sadly i cant say that i would want my kids to go there. Its time to clean house in the top ranks of RSU 67.
On Tuesday the case was finalized. Board members received the arbitration document. On Wednesday the board evaluated the Superintendent (2 months early, as this should take place in December, but with an election of new board members coming up in 3 weeks, you get it?). The board offered her 2 more years and another raise of $3000. They had already negotiated her contract for this year, yet today, Friday, she received a heftier-than-usual paycheck because the board made it retroactive back to July. Is that even legal???? Once you negotiate your contract for this year (she got an $8000 raise a couple of months ago) can you go back and add to it and make it retroactive? Come on, RSU67, get your heads out of the sand!!! How much damage are you going to allow this person to do to your small towns, and to your kids? You got rid of the town manager at the first glance of trouble, yet you let this woman run right over you? One lawsuit down, and another just starting, and the third will start right after that one. Such a waste of your tax dollars, and the next case is much worse than this one. Vote down her budget, vote down the acquisition of the Trout school, get rid of those school board members, and start rebuilding before it’s too late.
P.S. Why do you think those board members always, always, always back her? They have the same information that all of you have. Think about that one. If they were smart, they would resign before this next suit starts as they are also named, and this really is a big one.
this is part of the reason we are ranked 25th in math skills.
Dear friends in Lincoln,
Can you say “vote of no confidence?”