PORTLAND, Maine — A Superior Court judge Tuesday afternoon reversed his decision and allowed the release of information identifying the men charged with engaging a prostitute in the high-profile Kennebunk prostitution case.

Shortly afterward, at about 5:30 p.m., the Kennebunk Police Department released ages and addresses to go along with the list of 21 names of alleged johns issued Monday.

Cumberland County Superior Court Justice Thomas Warren issued a simple ruling Tuesday afternoon that vacated a temporary restraining order he had issued the day before preventing the release of addresses of those already charged by the Kennebunk Police Department. Warren rejected the remaining requests by an attorney for two men identified as John Doe No. 1 and John Doe No. 2 who had sought to stop the release of their names.

Not long after the ruling, Kennebunk Police Department Lt. Anthony Bean Burpee released the names and identifying information. He also issued a statement with the list stating that the names of other individuals summoned in the case would be “released in the regular semiweekly Kennebunk Police Department report in accordance with the Department’s regular practice of updating its ‘police blotter.’”

The next release is expected to be issued on Oct. 26, he said.

“Moreover, please be mindful of the presumption of innocence under the law,” wrote Bean Burpee. “A summons is not a conviction; it is only a charge. No one should pass judgment prematurely on those to whom a summons is issued.”

Police and attorneys involved in the case previously have said the alleged prostitution business in Kennebunk could have catered to more than 100 potential clients.

The Bangor Daily News did not publish the names of those charged with engaging a prostitute until their identities were clear. Without residences and ages, several of the names on the list could correspond to multiple men.

Bean Burpee had explained in a previous statement that “In keeping with the Superior Court’s ruling, the Kennebunk Police Department has been directed to release only the names of certain persons issued summonses and to withhold addresses, to include hometowns and states of residency, as some may also be alleged victims of criminal invasion of privacy. While the Superior Court ruling does not address the issue of ages being released for those who have been issued summonses, doing so would contribute to the identification of alleged victims of criminal invasion of privacy.”

Each of the men has been charged with engaging a prostitute, a Class E misdemeanor punishable by a fine.

On Tuesday, the BDN filed a freedom of access request with the Kennebunk Police Department asking for all summonses issued in the last 30 days to those charged with engaging a prostitute and all records indicating the full names and ages of those issued summonses.

The department forwarded the request to its attorneys William Dale and Patricia Dunn.

A southern Maine newspaper also filed a motion in Cumberland County to intervene in the John Doe cases to challenge the judge’s ruling. After agreeing to an expedited hearing, Justice Warren issued a two-sentence ruling Tuesday afternoon simply vacating the temporary restraining order he had approved earlier. There was no explanation given.

At least two men whose names match those on the list had complained Monday and Tuesday about how the names had been released to that point.

Former York County Deputy and sheriff candidate Paul Main told WCSH on Monday that he hasn’t been charged, and seeing his name on the list made him “very upset.”

“When I first saw my name on the computer I laughed,” Main told the Portland television station. “And then as I got up to walk out, I’m thinking to myself [about] all my years in law enforcement, all my years, activities with children, coaching baseball, the young men that I know who are now dads today and responsible citizens — this is very misleading and I don’t think it’s fair.”

Another Maine man whose name is the same as one that appears on the list said Tuesday “it sure as heck ain’t me” who was charged as a john.

“I’m 86 years old,” he said. “I haven’t been to Kennebunk in 40 years.”

Warren’s decision Monday to order the names released while withholding other identifying information, such as their addresses, made sense under Maine law, according to a University of Maine School of Law professor.

“Judge Warren’s order was completely appropriate for the issues raised,” said professor E. James Burke.

Warren’s ruling was on a motion filed by attorney Stephen Schwartz of Portland who argued that both the names and other identifying information about his clients — identified only as John Doe No. 1 and John Doe No. 2 — should not be released.

Burke agreed that the linchpin of Schwartz’s successful argument was that his clients also were victims of invasion of privacy because, according to police, they were secretly videotaped while having sex with a prostitute. As victims of a crime themselves, the men thus also benefit from state laws designed to protect the identity of victims, Schwartz argued.

“That was very inventive, good lawyering by Steve Schwartz,” Burke said. “He was doing exactly what his client wanted in an incredibly uphill battle.”

Burke added, however, that when the defendants appear in court their identities will be known. He said they also may be called as witnesses.

“There are tons of ways for them to be identified and few to keep them private,” the professor said.

State prosecutors have accused Thomaston businessman Mark W. Strong Sr. and Kennebunk fitness instructor Alexis Wright of running a prostitution operation out of Wright’s Zumba studio.

Strong, 57, of Thomaston was indicted early this month on 59 counts, which include promotion of prostitution, invasion of privacy, and conspiracy; and Alexis Wright, 29, of Wells was indicted on 106 counts, including charges of engaging in prostitution, violation of privacy and failure to pay taxes.

The Superior Court motion filed by Schwartz also sought to permanently prevent the district attorney’s office from prosecuting Wright’s alleged clients. Schwartz argued that the amount of harm inflicted on the alleged johns would outweigh the necessity to prosecute such a low-level offense.

“The state’s interest in prosecuting the low-level offense of engaging a prostitute is not outweighed by the invasion of privacy that will inure to plaintiffs if the prosecution proceeds,” the motion stated.

BDN writer Seth Koenig contributed to this report.

Join the Conversation

63 Comments

  1. Dear God the legal system regarding this case is more dramatic than the actual case.

    I wonder what the headline of BDN will be tomorrow, “names of people who might know at least one of the johns will be released starting Monday…..or is it Tuesday.  Wait, maybe they will only release their middle names.”

    This case is getting national attention and the court system looks like complete amateurs…pathetic.

    1.  35 years of the Dems ruling Maine has left government a dysfunctional mess at all levels. It’s sad really.

  2. This has gone beyond the circus stage. Talk about an embarrassment & not to the “Johns” either.  Could this case be handled any more incompetently?  That includes the PD, DA, & so-called judge.  Anyone wonder about the Maine “justice system”  inconsistencies (I dunno, drug, child abuse, etc. “sentencing”) & witnessing this cluster have any questions?  This entire thing is going to blow up into an even bigger embarrassment than it already is.

  3. They are trying to hold up a system that is irreparably broken. Release the information and let the chips fall where they may. Sorry, but that’s the only thing that will ameliorate the situation for the innocent, ie people with same names, embarrassed family members, or people who have been caught in extortion or blackmail. Do what is right.

  4. Seems to me these people who are fighting to keep their names from being listed and released are bringing more attention to themselves with all this trying to prevent it!  I probably wouldn’t have even read the article or list before but now my curiosity is up!

    1.  Lawyers, mayors, business executives, married men – I can understand why people are freaking out.  Too bad they didn’t think of that before they hired the hooker.

        1. Thats correct. when studying bookkeeping sometimes people makeup a business to practice with. The only thing that will be proof is the videos. (-;

        2. Who died and left you “protector of all”?.  This forum is not a court of law, so anyone can voice their opinion.

          1. Goodness I do hope no one has died.

            Now let’s look at your second sentence. “This forum is not a court of law, so anyone can voice their opinion.”

            Does that apply to me or just people you agree with?

  5. People have similar names so, giving the info will protect those who may have a same name with different middle name and address.  This is the right action to protect those who were not involved.  The judge and the DA need to get their act together.

    1. I fully agree. All one needs to do is go to White Pages.com and punch in James White (one of the 21 names). More than a dozen James Whites pop up, many of whom have wives or loved ones listed who have absolutely NOTHING to do with the case, but will be inundated with calls, questions and embarassment. And, now it seems the judge has decided not to release more names. What a fiasco! The totally innocent people with similar names should sue them.

  6. Thank you BDN for keeping the people updated on this case.. What if some of these johns are working with kids in their jobs.. Knowing the character of people you intrust your kids with is important. Thanks again BDN

    1. Holy molly, this is about an adult paying another adult for sex and you’re tying kids into it.Bit of a stretch isn’t it? Wonder if the bus driver has ever had an affair. teacher, janitor,the cook at school. How about you?

      1. when I was young I slept with married women now and then. does that count? prior to getting married and remaining faithfull for 30+ years

          1. I didn’t charge them so I didn’t commit a crime. got some nice clothes and a pair of shoes out of it.

    2. What!  Oh my God!  What if one of these Johns are you father?  Are you going to not let him baby sit his gradkids….  Come on she is just a sweet little thing and rather beautiful…what man would not like to bed her….get real

    1. Just checked “the list”  thanks!..gah,I hope she got ALOT of money for sleeping with all of those old fossils…Nasty…No wonder they had to pay for it…arghhhh

  7. Well I think we should all just forget about this hooker and john crap….  What self respection 39 to 60 something man would not want to jump the bones of this sweet little girl?

  8. I’m having homemade beefstew tonight, My honey told me since I haven’t made the list I’m still on her good side. phew!!! respect for my wife goes along with loving her.

  9. Fare as I know its not against the law to have sex….It is only against the law to take money for sex.  A person can have sex as much as they want with whom ever they want and as many times a day if they want.    So this is what she did.  If he wanted to give her a little gift of money upon leaving what of it…
    Look we have a casino why not hookers…

    1. Exactly – job creation! Think of how many more people would be in the work force if Maine legalized prostitution, then prostitutes (male and female) can become legitimate and tax paying  responsible citizens; and just think, a politician could take credit for job creation if they had the guts to introduce a legalization bill…….

  10. BREAKING NEWS   EARTHQUAKE IN MAINE AT 710PM  TONIGHT

    http://earthquake.usgs.gov/earthquakes/eventpage/usb000d75b#summary

    M4.6 – 5km W of Hollis Center, Maine
    2012-10-16 23:12:22 UTC

    UPDATE AT 728PM: TREMORS FELT FROM MAINE TO BOSTON AREA
    UPDATE: 730PM: RHODE ISLAND RESIDENTS REPORTING TREMORS

    BDN STORY:
    http://bangor-launch.newspackstaging.com/2012/10/16/news/state/4-5-magnitude-earthquake-strikes-maine-northern-new-england/

    BDN now has an article online…this ends your skowheganresident breakin news segment…now back to your regular schedule story:

  11.  http://www.kjonline.com/news/maine-kennebunk-johns-prostitution-zumba-wright-strong-alexis-police-clients-list.html

  12. I fully agree. All one needs to do is go to White Pages.com and punch in James White (one of the 21 names). More than a dozen James Whites pop up, many of whom have wives or loved ones listed who have absolutely NOTHING to do with the case, but will be inundated with calls, questions and embarassment. And, now it seems the judge has decided not to release more names. What a fiasco! The totally innocent people with similar names should sue them.

  13. “Moreover, please be mindful of the presumption of innocence under the law,” wrote Bean Burpee. “A summons is not a conviction; it is only a charge. No one should pass judgment prematurely on those to whom a summons is issued.”
    Good let convincing any of these righteous commenters that.

    In all likelihood, of course, these guys are probably guilty, but that’s not how things work in this country. You are innocent until PROVEN guilty, not innocent until PROBABLY guilty. 

    1.  Commentators…. on the BDN get it right from the beginning  a story is  published in the BDN…e.g.  car/fire bombing in Bangor Maine…Commentators said, from the very beginning… it involved Drugs, and they were spot on  and  !they call it,  as it is!!!

        1.  your  wrong on many levels….. media wins elections… everything is tried in the media today!!! right or wrong, it’s the way it is!!!

    2. what part of the videos or information of each old nasty hen don’t you understand. she has more information on each old hen then their wives or loved ones.

  14. Has anyone told these men that they can get it for free?? Or at least at the cost of a few drinks… There are plenty of um.. “loose” women out there!

  15. i cannot believe joe cuetara is on the list,i am shocked that you would do something so low. How did you get away from the nursing home long enough? Oh, there is more than one joe coetara? could be confusing without more info…….Sorry Mr.coutera, happy 93 birthday by the way. 

  16. this will disrupt marriages and create potential domestic situations possibly involving children 

  17. You know this is such a great deal for this working woman.

     “She works hard for her money”.

    “Lealize it, don’t criticize it”.

    “Live and let live”.

    “Live it out”.

    Get the movie rights, stand your ground.

    You have a great story, I have no doubt.

    The 99% are always the ones prosecuted by self-rightous, contumelious, contumacious “nobleman”.

    I pray that you have the strength to endure.

    Peace be with you.  You are not alone.

  18. get over it  there would not have been a prostitution ring if no men existed so if she is presumed guilty and there are videos and names of the johns, then they should be held as responsible as the woman. I don’t  see anyone worrying about her reputation

  19. Just a thought, maybe the newspapers should wait until someone has been convicted of something before listing their name?  Seems like trial by newspaper is becoming way too common these days.
    Especially in a case where no addresses were listed and several people of the same name live in the area?  Gutter journalism at its finest.  Perhaps a few lawsuits would smarten up?

Leave a comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *