PORTLAND, Maine — Angus King’s campaign called on the state’s TV stations Monday to pull two Republican ads from the air that it says offer an inaccurate and misleading portrayal of King’s involvement in a 22-turbine wind project in the western Maine town of Roxbury. King and business partner Rob Gardiner held a 10 percent stake in the project until early 2011.

At a Monday news conference, King campaign manager Kay Rand said the campaign is filing formal complaints with the TV stations airing the ads claiming that the stations are required to remove the ads under federal law.

“Initially, we thought our course was to educate, but it’s obvious that educating isn’t all that we need to do,” Rand said. “We would take legal action if that’s what’s required.”

Rand said King was out of state Monday and unable to attend the news conference.

The campaign is asking stations to remove two ads from the National Republican Senatorial Committee that target King for his involvement in the wind energy business before becoming a U.S. Senate candidate.

The announcement came more than a week after the Republican committee, the GOP’s Senate campaign arm, waded into the Maine Senate race with a two-week, statewide offensive against the independent former governor who’s the front-runner in the race to replace Olympia Snowe in the Senate. The committee has said its two-week push in Maine will ultimately total $650,000.

The most recent TV spot King is targeting, launched over the weekend, features five people portrayed to be residents who live near the Record Hill installation. They call King a “smooth operator,” say he “was making millions and millions of dollars,” and lament that “we’re not going to retrieve the tops of those mountains.” The spot ends with a man saying, “I just don’t like the idea of him being our senator.”

The ad asks, “Angus King got a sweetheart deal for his windmills … but what did Mainers get?”

King’s campaign said it was challenging the ad on two points, saying King did not make millions of dollars from the wind company and that he didn’t get a “sweetheart deal.” The campaign also launched a rebuttal ad Monday that features Record Hill-area residents praising the wind project and King for a project that created jobs and lowered local property taxes.

Federal law requires broadcast stations to accept and air ads from federal candidates. The law, however, allows stations to reject third-party ads such as the Republican senatorial committee’s and requires that the stations take steps to ensure the reliability of an ad. Stations can be held liable for the ads’ content, according to a publication from the Annenberg School for Communication at the University of Pennsylvania. Under federal law, stations have a duty “to protect the public from false, misleading or

deceptive advertising.”

Managers at stations in the Bangor, Portland and Presque Isle markets didn’t immediately respond to requests for comment.

Record Hill was one of two wind projects King was involved in as a partner in Independence Wind, the business he owned with partner Rob Gardiner until he sold his stake in March to run for the Senate.

King has said he banked about $212,000 from his Independence Wind ventures: from selling his stake in the company in March and from collecting $50,000 a year in management fees for his work on Record Hill and one other wind project proposal, in Highland Plantation in Somerset County. King’s net worth — which his financial disclosure forms show is between $5.3 million and $23.6 million — dropped by almost $340,000 when he sold his Independence Wind stake, according to his campaign.

Brian Walsh, the Republican senatorial committee’s communications director, said the group’s ad is accurate and described King’s attempts to remove it from the airwaves “a desperate PR distraction.”

“If Angus King has an issue with Mainers talking about his federal government loan and the millions of dollars he’s made since leaving office, then perhaps he should have listened to their concerns before ramming this project forward,” Walsh said in an email. “The simple fact is that the ad is accurate and King knows it, and these legal threats are nothing but a desperate PR distraction from that fact.”

The National Republican Senatorial Committee’s first ad in its two-week campaign targeted the $102 million federally guaranteed loan Record Hill, LLC received from the same federal economic stimulus program as Solyndra, the green energy company that failed after receiving a $528 million federally backed loan and became a political liability for the Obama administration.

The loan to Record Hill was one of more than two dozen cited in a congressional inquiry last March led by Republican U.S. Rep. Darrell Issa of California.

The inquiry, which accuses the U.S. Department of Energy of “dysfunction, negligence and mismanagement,” questioned whether the Record Hill project needed the loan and whether the technology it was using met the federal guidelines for receiving it.

Gardiner said in March that the Record Hill project met all qualifications and that the project was caught up in a political battle on Capitol Hill. King’s campaign points out that the loan is being repaid and that taxpayers haven’t been on the line for the money since the company hasn’t failed.

King and Gardiner held a 10 percent stake in the Record Hill project until January 2011 and were responsible for handling state and local permitting for the project. The project received the federal loan in August 2011.

At the news conference Monday, 39-year Roxbury resident Kathy Sutton said King was responsive to residents’ concerns related to the Record Hill project and that local taxes have gone down dramatically since the turbines’ installation.

“There were windmills on the hill,” Sutton said. “That’s about the only accurate thing in the ad.”

The Sun Journal reported in August that Roxbury’s property tax rate dropped to $6.93 for every $1,000 in property value for the 2012-13 tax year from $16.86 the previous year as a result of the turbines.

Representatives from the Maine Wind Industry Initiative, wind developer Reed & Reed, and Ocean Renewable Power Co., which recently installed four turbines that generate tidal power in Cobscook Bay, also spoke in King’s defense.

The effort to remove the ads highlights how more than $1.5 million in advertising from outside groups has become a defining issue in this fall’s Senate campaign. The King campaign’s complaints came days after two polls showed King’s lead over Republican Charlie Summers shrinking. The polls indicate that the advertising attacks on King have taken a toll on his popularity, especially among Republican voters.

King last week called on Summers to ask for the negative ads to be taken off the air. In response, Summers’ campaign spokesman Drew Brandewie wrote in an email that King’s “hypocrisy knows no bounds,” noting the former governor had traveled to Washington, D.C., on Thursday for a fundraiser.

BDN writer Seth Koenig contributed to this report.

Join the Conversation

248 Comments

      1. It is only class war if we the people dare to do what the elite already, always, do.

        Short of  lying like the conservative do, how can being just like them ever be wrong, politically ?

    1.  Threatening to sue is the American Way.  Spreading disinformation is the Republican way.  Spreading naivete is the Democratic way.  I’ll stick with the American . . . .

  1. If campaign ads had to be accurate, Obama wouldn’t have anything to air.

    And can the Summers and Dill campaigns request that the King ads be removed for inaccuracies?

      1. Well, that is not a very serious or productive approach, especially when the 
        National Republican Senatorial Committee has already been accused of clearly lying, by an Independent.

        Just think it over, Wolly, and stop feeding the trolls, who have nothing better than that , and “no compromise” to offer, to the discussion, and just more of same failed economic policies for America. 

    1. “can the Summers and Dill campaigns request that the King ads be removed for inaccuracies? ”

      Why would you need to ask ?
      Aren’t you an American ?
      How is such a ignorant question politically productive ?

      In my mind, never mind that it is defending lies and conservative liars, 
      BUT what does say it say about some conservative bully-boys personal values and understanding of the Rule of Law, the very foundation of the American system ?

      Faced with that reality, why not give Tag’ point all full respect and honest political
      consideration ?

      So, who will vote for her hopeless vision of an America where she thinks there is not equal protection, before law even for the rich politically connected people like political candidates,  ?

      Why, besides ignorance, which IS just cause to both not respect and oppose her political positions,  would honest person ever ask that question ?

          1.  Obama hasn’t been effective enough to get anything done after the first few months of his administration. So he can’t campaign on that. What he did accomplish, Stimulus & Obamacare, he has been careful  not to campaign on.   ihunt’s comment sounds accurate to me. He has nothing to air.

          2. So ?
            What does that have to do with this story ?
            First, King is not in Obama’s  Party.
            Is he ? 
            If you do not realize and respect at least that much, should anyone respect or care about your political opinions ?

            Secondly, why does your opinion justify the National GOP’s well organized lies ?

            Which brings me back to my point, Cheesecakes, how and why do think anyone should respect your desperate, partisan, shotgun defense of conservative institutional lying liars and their lies ?

            How do you expect it to be politically productive to say my side is no worse than you liberals  
            who I despise and have no respect for ? 

            My reaction is just what negative campaigning, like the  National Republican Senatorial Committee  does, naturally leads to. 

            So,why isn’t the  National Republican Senatorial Committee focused on how voting for them and their policies is better for Mainers.

            Remember that when you vote.

          3. So, there is that false conservative logic about ethics, once again.
            Can’t honestly tell you I want you to stop 
            In fact, keep it up because it does not change any committed minds.

            But in terms hard for a mother, like you, to pretend you don’t get or can lie about not understanding to maintain your partisanship , Cheesecakes;ethically speaking just because all of your partisan koven jumps off that bridge, should you,too ? 

          4.  I believe King is on record as being an Obama supporter.  He is on record as a Baldacci .  Would say he is pretty damn close to the being a secret member of the democrat party.

          5. You say: “first King is not of Obama’s party!”  Sorry yes he is!  Calling himself an “independent” is a total prevarication!  He is a democrat and will definitely show his real colors the moment he is elected (should, God help us, he might be!)

            The rest of your post is irrational nonsense!

          6. That so? Try looking up Obama’s accomplishments before you make your claim. And POTUS managed to get ALL this done despite an obstructionist and hate filled GOP Congress! You try that as an African American born with a name like Barack Obama! Intelligent people know what the President stands for and who he represents. All 100% not just the 53% affluent..people better beware..Republicans also fall into that 47%!

          7.  Produce those accomplishments please. You will discover whatever he did was passed in the first few months of his administration. The only things he had done after that is by executive order and can be rescinded the same way.  The only people here that care that he is African American is you.
            I still claim him to be the most ineffective President in my recollection. That includes Carter btw.

          8. The dear leader was not born “Barack Obama”! He was born Barry Obama ! Changed his name to enshrine his place in the muslim brotherhood !

          9. Hmmm the first 2 years was all controlled by Democrats so you can’t use that at all!  And he has not accomplished jack squat!

          10. He murdered or maimed over 10,000 civilians with his drone attacks. That’s a record, whether it’s effective or not we don’t know since he doesn’t own up to all this carnage. Obama’s hands and big mouth are covered with the blood of innocents. 

          11.  I do know that any male above the age of 13 that has been killed by drones is now classified as an enemy combatant.

          12.  Current casualty statistics, intended to show the effectiveness of drone
            strikes, count all military-age males killed in drone strikes to be
            “enemy combatants.” Unless those killed as collateral damage of the
            drone strike are posthumously proven to be innocent, which is
            particularly difficult considering the fact that missile strikes often
            leave their victims unrecognizable, they are reported as hostiles. This
            method of reporting casualties is absolutely inaccurate and can only
            lead to the underreporting of civilian causalities caused by drone
            strikes.

          13. Oh, silly me, I thought you’d be concerned about dead American soldiers.
            But, you’re  in full partisan conservative , no compromise, no ethics mode, now.

            I love it.
            It shows the undecided how conservatives really thing.
            You did not learn a thing from your boy’s, 47% moment, did you ?

          14. Ok then why does the VP think that there are 650,000 troops in Afghanistan?  Oh thats right because he has no clue!

    2.  Which of Obama’s ads have been dishonest?  And yes, Summers and Dill can request that the king ads be removed.

        1. “All of them”?!?

          What kind of a lunatic fantasy world do you live in? I defy you to give me a single instance of an Obama ad which is guilty of perpetrating a falsehood.

      1. How about the one that says Romney will RAISE taxes on the middle class?!  That one’s a real howl.  Which candidate is more likely to raise taxes?  Romney or Obama?  C’mon be honest….

        1.  Well those are two very different questions. Romney is more likely to give tax cuts to the upper class, but if Romney goes through with the tax plan he has planned, he would need to raise taxes on the middle class. Something Obama has not done and in all likelihood will not do.

          Romney has said he believes anyone making up to $250,000 is “middle class” but even the staunchest GOP economists admit that he would need to heavily raise tax cuts on what Romney believes to be the middle class. This article explains it better than I can: http://www.washingtonpost.com/blogs/ezra-klein/wp/2012/09/24/even-mitt-romney-admits-hell-need-to-raise-taxes-on-the-middle-class/
          Granted, it has an obvious bias, but it does draw from reliable sources to make a pretty valid point.

          1. I appreciate your civil comment Alex.  Romney is on record ( 60 Minutes ) as saying he will not raise taxes on the middle class and will not lower them on the wealthy.  He said it. He should be taken at his word and all the ads we see saying he WILL raise taxes on the middle class should be deemed as simply, deceptive.   Having said that, he should be held accountable if elected.  

            I also don’t believe ANY political ads.  They are all just fertilizer imo.  People who are truly swayed by them, probably are ones that don’t take the time to do their due diligence to begin with.  Unless they are so partisan they vote for party over principal anyway.  People should take the time to do their own research and be objective and consider the source material as well.  For example, if you are listening to Rush Limbaugh or Sean Hannity you’ll get one side of the viewpoint just as if you read the NY times or the Huffington Post you’ll be pushed the other way.  The truth is always somewhere in the middle!  Something I feel that has been lost on many Americans.

            I never fall in love with either one candidate or the other, simply because I’m neither rich enough to buy into the GOP stereotype, nor poor enough to buy into the Dems core philosophy.  I try to vote for who I think will do the best job for the country or state in the given particular time.  I wish others shared that view. 

      2. How about the woman that got cancer 5 years after she worked for one of Romney’s businesses?  How about the Bush tax cuts that he could have ended but now is campaigning on those same cuts, just like 4 years ago?

        1. Oh please you believe that crap.  Her own boss came on and said she wasn’t even there when she had cancer!  

    3.  That’s the best you can do? There are rules, laws and regulations. You can’t just make a TV commercial that is not backed up by fact:

      Defamation—also called calumny, vilification, traducement, slander (for transitory statements), and libel (for written, broadcast, or otherwise published words)—is the
      communication of a statement that makes a claim, expressly stated or implied to be factual, that may give an individual, business, product, group, government, religion, or nation  a negative or inferior image. This can be also any disparaging statement made by one person about another, which is communicated or published, whether true or false, depending on legal state.

      1. Well so far Romney starting with his primary run  against 5 other GOP Candidates  He ran scathing and dishonest ads aimed to totally destroy his opponents..seems that’s how the GOP rolls!

        1. Hmm lets talk about Obama going against Clinton in the last election.  He put a whole lot of attack adds against her, but I don’t here you talking about that.  and he only got elected in Illinois because he had people kicked off the ballot including the incumbent!

    4. I’m seeing variations of  this comment littered throughout this feed, but no one is giving an example of what his ads are lying about.

      But beyond that, did you actually read the article? Here’s a refresher:
      “Federal law requires broadcast stations to accept and air ads from
      federal candidates. The law, however, allows stations to reject
      third-party ads such as the Republican senatorial committee’s and
      requires that the stations take steps to ensure the reliability of an
      ad.”

      So these out-of-staters making false claims to sway the vote are legally accountable for their actions, but even if Summers or Dill or King put up an inaccurate ad, it does not have to be removed. But lucky for us, the only false claims made in ads so far have been from organizations in DC.

  2. I hate the term “from away”. Very close minded. It assumes that only locals have good ideas and judging from the current state of thing I would say that is false.

    1. The problem isn’t about being from away.  The problem is people who move here to get away from the hassles of big city life and then procede to make Maine just like it.

    2.  Correction:  Don’t peddle your assumptions about “from away”.  To me, it means just what it says – people who don’t live here – no more and no less.  If you want to infer some derogatory connotation that’s your right.  Which people, in the group that promoted the ad, live here in Maine?

  3. Typical Republican manipulations and downright lies. Anything to smear, discredit, attack the character of their opponents. That’s all they have.

    1. And they are getting despirate.  Charlie and the Heritage boys arn’t doing so good.  Mainers are on to them.  Also, Repubs are trying to take over the Senate as well as keep their majority in House.  Let them air their silly lies and spend all their money on a lost cause.  Rhe more I see ads from away, the more determined I am to vote for King.  I think the Chamber of Commerce should stick to handing out travel brochures.

    2. President Obama conceded his “biggest disappointment” is that he hasn’t significantly changed the tone in Washington since taking office — and acknowledged sometimes his campaign ads go “overboard” and contain “mistakes.”Read more: Obama admits some ads-go overboard with manipulations and downright lies.

  4. Getting out of the blow/wind business just before an election doesn’t change the fact that King made millions from defacing the State of Maine.

    1.  And what does Vigue want to do building his highway?  Or the developers around Moosehead Lake?  We used to like people in this country making money.

    2. Frankie, do you live there??  I was just there, I didn’t see any defacing?  I bet you’re from out of state aren’t you?

      1. I am a Maine native and still live here. The only thing that went out of state is the little power wind produces. Just looking at the wind mills is defacing the landscape.

        1. I was born and raised as well, my father was a paper-maker for 40 years!  Am I to believe that all that clear cutting that happened in the state to put food on my familie’s table was a horrible thing? 

      2. I am a Maine native and still live here. The only thing that left the state is the little power the windmills produced.

    3.  Can you post up a link to the financial records that document the millions he supposedly made?  Or are you just blowing smoke?  I’d like some facts please. 

    4. What is a fact as you state is that Angus King DID make millions off of our backs, and got Caught!
      In earlier times, snake-oil salesman, land robbers and scoundrels were hung by the nearest tree limb.
      His only consequence is that he has finally been exposed for what he is.
      Now let the first amendment and the people decide on Nov 6th who he is and what his political future will be.
      We are all fortunate that our founding fathers knew the power of the First Amendment in a free society, and codified it in the Bill of Rights.
      Only  despots kings and scoundrels try to control it.

  5. I was just there 4wheeling with friends. We went to the turbines.  I expected it to be loud.  It was not.  I expected it to be ugly.  It was not, they were graceful.  The view was still beautiful.  Maine people built it.  Maine people had thier taxes lowered.  Maine people get lower electric bills.  It’s a natural  source of energy.  Wind. 

    1. Did you see any of the environmental devastation that anti-wind posters keep talking about?  

      Did you see any of the “blasting to smithereens and reshaping entire mountains in a scenic region like Partridge Peak and Flathead Mt. in Roxbury” ?

      1. No, I saw just the opposite.  It was beautiful!  We took tons of pictures, ones with the turbines in the background.  The road up in perfect shape.  While we were there, families driving up, people on atv’s driving up.  Soon the snowmobiles will be going up.  We saw deer up there!  My opinion, but this is a true “If you build it, they will come!” place.  When I go back up to Roxbury, I’ll go again, just a beautiful view!

          1. Who cares?  You want alternative energy solutions but complain when something better comes along.  I’m not saying I agree with all this crap from King, but I could care less if a few birds die in order to get cheaper energy solutions!

          2. Thank you for sharing that link with me it was very informative.  

            Do you have a link that can help educate me on how many (number) birds that have been killed by windmills?

          3. Just being sarcastic, LOL.  that’s one of the first things the opposition brings out of their bag of tricks

    2.  I am afraid you are mistaken.  Electric bills are not lowered by wind power.  The truth is electricity generated by wind is significantly more  expensive – and that does not even count the sweetheart deals, the giveaway of public dollars the government gives the developers.

      1. Ya, kinda like the subsidies given to the petroleum companies.  Except the amounts are way less, of course.

          1. “The American Coalition for Ethanol estimates that when combined with state and local government aid to large oil companies, subsidies amount to anywhere from $133.8 billion to $280.8 billion annually from all sources of taxpayer aid that goes to the oil and gas industry. ”   Look here: http://news.yahoo.com/history-u-oil-subsidies-back-nearly-century-215500548.html.   Get some facts yerself.  Btw, this has been going on since 1916. Pennies on the dollar my left patootie.

          2.  Ethanol?  You are promoting Ethanol?  Ethanol is a lesson in mass insanity.  Food Prices have risen for everyone because of Ethanol.  It takes more energy to produce ethanol than ethanol burns on its own.  File economy, miles per gallon, DECREASE with the addition of ethanol.  Ethanol is a catastrophic failure.  However, we all must genuflect with the leftist greens, right?

          3. No, I am not promoting ethanol.  How did you ever get that out of what I posted?  Did you read what I posted or do you already have your mind made up about subsidies to the petroleum industry?  My point is the petroleum industry has been subsidized since 1916.  What don’t you get about this fact?
            The US would be wise to subsidize wind, water and tide, just exactly like we subsidized oil, a new industry, in the past. Oil is finite: wind, water and tides are not. why not move forward?

          4. I’m not in favor of oil subsidies either.  The oil industry would be just fine without them.  However, ethanol and all green energy, every single flavor, wind, solar AND ethanol, you name it, would go out of business quickly if the government stopped redistributing our paychecks to them.

          5. Subsidies are a reality.  Subsidies grew the petroleum industry to our advantage  That industry is now dying.  We must subsidize those who are thinking forward.  Wind, water, solar and tides are the future, no matter what your opinion is.  You invest?  Invest in wind, solar, tides and water or be left behind.  That’s the reality.

          6. Invest in wind, solar and tides and you will lose your shirt.  The only reason they make any money is because of the subsidies.  Oil gets tax breaks, not subsidies and is hardly a dying business.  If a business could grow on its own, make jobs and a product that was competitive, investors would be lining up.  But wind, solar and tides are a niche’ industry that will remain just that until we find an economical way to store their power.  They are very low density energy producers and we need high density power for growth.

          7. Those ethanol subsidies to the oil industry are to get them to try and make lemonaid out of lemons.  Nothing has been worse for the oil industry than to have them put alcohol into gasoline.  It is not very good for our cars or small engines either.  It has raised the cost of food astronomically, too.

        1.  Yes, sort of, and yes, on a percentage basis the subsidies given to oil companies are literally a drop in the bucket compared to wind and solar.  Of course, I am not in favor of subsidies to oil, wind or solar.  Oil does just fine on its own.  Wind and Solar would quickly be out of business if Obama stopped redistributing our paychecks to the environmental lobby.

          1. See my reply to mainewtf  immediately above your post to me.  That’s a drop in the bucket compared to wind and solar? 

      2. No I’m not mistaken, I talked to my father in law (who lives there) and some people I met up by the turbines, they all said they get a check once a quarter and in the case of my father in law, his property taxes went from $1000.00 to just under $400 a year.  I’m no math teacher, but it sounds like a savings to me.

        1. OK, so the people who live right near the turbines get a rebate.  I assure you the other 1.3 million people in this state do not.  In truth, out electric bills are higher, by a lot because, as everyone knows, wind power is much more expensive.

          1. Actually my bill has been on average the same for that last 6-7 years.  I don’t have a wind mill in my back yard.  I signed up for electricitymaine.com to ensure my power comes from within the state.  How can Maine people working be a negative for the state? Put people to work, build our economy.  Paying for welfare is alot more expensive.

          2.  By your logic, we should all get a bag of rocks and smash windows.  That way the people who sell and install windows can have jobs.  You can’t build people up by tearing others down.

    3. Wicked – – – I do live near one of these defacing wind farms in a part of Maine that we have cherished for years for NOT having lights or the tops of the mountains blasted off.  They are not efficient, their energy is four times as expensive as gas or hydro power, the lights flashing all night in an area that WAS rated #1 on the dark-sky scale, the grid upgrades that have cost ALL Mainers a 20% increase in our delivery charges, and the fact that we no longer have the right to say what is built in our own backyard make this boondoggle truly criminal.  Go somewhere else to enjoy them, or just wait till they ruin where you live.

      1. Jim if you do live there, you must get a check once a quarter right?  Did your property taxes decrease?  I never saw flashing night-time lights which I’m sure keep you awake at night, but I choose electricity from Maine over it coming in from out of state.

          1. Windmills will not heat your home!  Windmills will not run your car, or save one drop of oil in Maine.  We use oil for less than 1% of our energy production. So far every fact you have thrown out there is a lie.

          2. I never said Windmills heat your home, I was implying that the money that people save will help with the oil bill. You might as well get used to alternative energy, with whats going on in the Middle East, we are going to need it.

        1. Wickedgood – I do not get a check, and my property taxes went UP not down.  I live directly across the lake from them and they are in a different town.  I just have to look at them.  This electricity does not go to Maine, it goes out of state.  We already have 50% of our energy from renewables, and this wind nonsense goes out of state.  The gas plant in Veazie cost a fraction of the wind projects, and produces ten times the amount of steady reliable energy.  It is raising our rates and the lights do spoil the night sky.  Do your homework and read the real numbers about wind.  It is far from being efficient, does not save one drop of oil, is not reliable, and causes the fossil fuel plants to maintain power to make up for when the wind dies.  They have to operate at a capacity that makes them inefficient and more costly.  Read something other than the wind shills propaganda.  They told us we were the “Saudi Arabia of Wind.”  We are actually in the lowest 89th percentile of wind in the US.  We just have gullible crooks that want the free money.

      1. Dolbylandfill problably more than a few of your unemployed help build them. Why don’t we take out RIP dam, that’s not so pretty to look at!

    4. CMP electrical transmission rates went up by 19.6% in July due to wind power. NICE WORK ANGUS!

      Google “What every Maine ratepayer needs to know”

    5. Wikedgood41, if you had lived through the building of these monstrosities last summer like I did, you would hve seen the overwhelming number of cars parked at the entrance to the windmill road on Rt. 120 with out of state plates. We had people from Texas, Utah, New York, Ct, N.H. and Mass. that I remember. The cenent trucks came rolling in with New Hampshire plates, evn the Main Blasting and Drilling truck had New Hampshire plates on it. The wind power repair truck that I saw at Ellis Pond Variety this summer had Texas plates on it. Not one permanent job was created by this project, and in year three, property taxes will go up when the Education formula kicks in and the citizens of Roxbury start paying a larger share into the RSU because of the increased tax base from the windmills. Angus King says that he had overwhelming support from the town, but the vote to build passed by only 6 votes. Unfortunately the pond residents who do not live there year round had no say because we are not registered to vote in Roxbury.

  6. Good. It’s about time that unaccountable out-of-state groups were challenged on their lies. The claim will not be true no matter how many times an ad or commenters say that King “made millions” off of government programs. IF IT IS TRUE, SHOW US THE FINANCIAL DISCLOSURES. Otherwise, takes your lies back out of state. 

    1. 4. DOE Allowed Large Energy Companies to Undercapitalize Projects and Shifted Risk to
      Taxpayers

      Even when a company had significant assets to cover a project, DOE put the taxpayer at a
      greater risk because of the way they structured the guarantee. In four cases among the 27 loan
      guarantees and Federal Financing Bank (FFB) loans, the parent or project sponsor that sought the
      benefit of a loan guarantee or FFB loan had a credit rating significantly above that of the project
      itself. In other words, in four cases, the borrower undercapitalized the project and refused to
      extend a parental guarantee.

      As a result, the taxpayer takes on greater risk, despite the borrowers’ ability to increase
      funding to the project. The most egregious use of this technique was in the case of Record Hill,
      LLC, where AAA rated Yale University created a project with a rating of only BB+. The idea
      that Yale would take a substantial taxpayer subsidy and still seek to protect its remaining assets
      from the liabilities of Record Hill reflects Yale’s view of the Record Hill project and its
      disregard for taxpayers. It is inconceivable that any normal bank would take these kinds of risk
      when loaning money. Banks traditionally insist on a number of provisions to “protect” their
      investment. Yet DOE and Treasury did just the opposite, and essentially let these companies
      dictate terms favorable to them and not to the taxpayer. The result is when the company defaults
      on their obligations, the taxpayer is left with little to no remedy.

      http://oversight.house.gov/wp-content/uploads/2012/03/FINAL-DOE-Loan-Guarantees-Report.pdf

      1. Hahahahhaha! Where does this say Angus made ANY money, let alone millions????? Additionally, if you apply for a home mortgage, receive it, and later the company is investigated (a la Bank of America) does that mean you were wrong for getting the mortgage? 

        Sometimes business-people have aims other than profit, like doing the right thing. 

          1.  The point would be that Angus is running for public office and so his interest should be what is good for the people, even at his personal expense. 

          2. I’m sorry, but I don’t understand your query.  Wouldn’t his personal expense include enrichment of his family and cronies?  If he’s not taking care of his cronies, they will not be taking care of him.  Not being taken care of by his cronies would certainly be an expense to him, yes?

          3. Privately yes I do, I do work for the public and they are first in mind, not my needs.. paycheck yes not as much as a senators paycheck.. I’m hoping public servants only collect from one sorce. (-;

        1. “…you were wrong for getting the mortgage?”  That’s not even close to the same issue.  Unless, of course, the “you” had a significant ownership and management interest in Bank of America.

          Please name 3 business people who have viable businesses that have some higher aspiration than to turn a profit.  Angus wouldn’t have been involved with Independence Wind if he weren’t making money on it. 

    2. Why did King have to do a fundraiser in DC?  Can’t he get money up here if he cares so much about Maine people and representing Maine?

      1. Dot is right.

         Summers should do the exactly same thing, if he can, which includes saying 
        what the lying liars lies are, specifically, please.

        “So do you, I’m partisan rubber, and you are glue.” is such puerile rhetoric it does not even work on a middle school schoolyard.  

        Seriously, is that worthy of any respect, here ?

    1. It isn’t the heat, it’s the lies!  You don’t have a problem with them?  A man without honesty has nothing.

      1.  He made his bed now he has to sleep in it. He knew his WIND power projects where going to come up in this election, this ad just hurts him to the bone, he doesn’t like it. That is about as honest as he gets.

        1. What is a fact as you state is that Angus King DID make millions off of our backs, and got Caught!
          In earlier times, snake-oil salesman, land robbers and scoundrels were hung by the nearest tree limb.
          His only consequence is that he has finally been exposed for what he is.
          Now let the first amendment and the people decide on Nov 6th who he is and what his political future will be.
          We are all fortunate that our founding fathers knew the power of the First Amendment in a free society, and codified it in the Bill of Rights.
          Only despots   kings and scoundrels try to control it.

        2. If you believe that the Chamber of Commerce is being honest about Angus King’s record, I’m in a position to sell you a very affordable bridge in Brooklyn, and I’ve also got a great investment opportunity involving a wealthy Nigerian widow that you won’t want to pass up.

    2.  Looks like King  just turned the oven up on their false advertising . . . looks like Summers is getting cooked.

    3. If ya can’t stand the heat get out of the kitchen Mr. King.

      27 people liked this.

      Talk about the defense of lying lairs and their lies !
      Given the source of the lies, and their partisan supporter’s defense of the lies, 
      why should one not think that partisan lying is the not only  the conservatives values, 
      but what their policies are based upon ?

  7. King’s campaign points out that the loan is being paid back and that taxpayers haven’t been on the line for the money since the company hasn’t failed.

        1. I guess you would rather send your money to Canada, Saudi Arabia, or Venezuela? Or obscure these mountains with the smog from coal?

        2.  Also, coal, gas, oil, nuclear, and hydro all get government support somehow.  Nuclear especially, gets billions in loan guarantees, (some granted by the Obama administration) otherwise plants would not operate or be built.

          1. There should be MORE nukes all around this country.  And a brand new one should be constructed in a suitable location in Washington county.  

          2. My bill from CMP is at least twice what it was when I lived in NH and got my power from PSNH.  I’m assuming there is waste being produced from Seabrook.  I know there are hundreds of great paying jobs being produced there as well as cheaper energy.  A boost that Washington county could desperately use.  The rate payers of Maine could certainly use a break too.

  8. Instead of making ads that speak ill of the other person, make the candidate look good based on their own merits and accomplishments.  Let the candidate tell us what they intend to do and how they intend to do it.

    Most preschoolers are better behaved than the politicians and their supporters.

    1. I’d love to hear Angus say what he intends to do and how he intends to do it, but unfortunately he doesn’t want to tip his hand to either side until after the election. Exactly what I want to hear from a politician who wants my vote…not!

  9. how about some ads just telling it like it is?
    like the shady backroom deals, 
    the first wind fiasco,
    the apple laptop program, while king owns stock in apple,
    and all the rest of the shenanigans that the snake oil politician did while in office and on the backs of the taxpayers?

  10. How about an ad showing where Anguish nurtured legislation while in office that gave expensive windpower (puke) “green” status while realativly inexpensive, renewable hydro power was excluded ?

    Would that make the King’s camp happy? 

    1.  Ever seen what a dam does to a stream?  Inexpensive only under a limited understanding of economics.  If a dam fails there is significant damage, and maybe loss of life, downstream.  If a wind turnbine fails there is likely to be far less collateral damage.

  11. The ad doesn’t say he made millions. Just that he got a sweatheart deal. If i only invested 10% in the company and walked away with $212,000 that would make it a sweatheart deal. Plus 50,000 a year for management fees. I could live on that

  12. I saw that during football last night. I’m not voting for Angus King – in fact I doubt I’m voting at all but it was hilarious “Angus King is a smooth operator”

  13. Amazing the liberal whackos were laying down in front of his bulldozers to stop building the windmill fiasco.Now he is the darling of the left 

  14. King is being crucified on the wind turbines he shoved down taxpayers throats and wanton destruction of our natural beauty. How fitting it is to to see him spin on the blades…

  15. An outside group runs a disinformation campaign that appeals to the ignorant and uniformed.  A lawsuit is appropriate – but ineffective.  In a better world people would recognize their own gullibility and avoid spreading the lies.  For instance, instead of repeating “he pocketed millions” when you have never seen his balance sheet, tax return or bank statements, try being honest and asking for some concrete evidence of the “millions”.  Unfortunately, its not a better world and we are all subjected to the ranting of the willfully ignorant and outright fraudulent.  

    Is there anyone that can explain why we should hate King for making money while loving Romney for doing the same?   The irony of the situation is not lost on those who have learned how to think critically.

    Dill has explained why she’s a better choice than either King or Summers.  King has explained whay he’s a better choice than either Dill or Summers. The  Republican Party can not seem to explain why Summers is the better choice, and so they spread misinformation.  I’m open to a rational, detailed explanation from Mr. Summers as to why we should elect him instead of Dill or King despite the dishonesty of his affiliates.

    1. King’s permit application was illegal and tampered with. Keep your eye on this space and save a cell in Thomaston.

  16. Both Angus King and Charlie Summers have stated they wish to
    get on the Armed Services Committee if elected.

    Summers served, King didn’t.

    Where is the part of King’s biography about how King took a legal aid job after law school in Virginia
    and with it got a near impossible occupational deferment so he wouldn’t be
    drafted like the less fortunate sons who were dying in Vietnam?

    Where does he discuss that the members of his family were
    Democrats in elected office in Alexandria, Va., a suburb of Washington,
    D.C. Where does he state that his
    uncle Jack (Jack Ticer) of Alexandria
    went to work at the Armed Service Committee during the Vietnam war? 

    Where does he therefore tell us his connections may have pulled strings for
    him so he could avoid military service?

    This is very important as Mr. King wants to get on Armed
    Services, now that the coast is clear and he can go to war from his armchair.

    King was born March 31, 1944 and graduated from law school
    in Virginia in 1969. This was the middle of the Vietnam War and there was a selective service lottery. The lottery drawing held December 1, 1969,
    determined the order in which men, born from 1944 through 1950, were called to
    report for induction into the military. The highest lottery number called for
    this group was 195; all men assigned that lottery number or any lower number,
    and who were classified 1-A or 1-A-O (available for military service), were
    called to report for possible induction. Angus King’s birthday drew a low
    lottery number of 30.

    The lottery numbers pulled for each birthday on December 1,
    1969 can be seen by googling:

    RESULTS FROM LOTTERY DRAWING – Vietnam Era 1970

    Occupational deferments were NEXT TO IMPOSSIBLE TO GET. But
    voila, Angus King got one by taking a job at Pinetree Legal Assistance in Maine
    where he primarily worked on divorce cases. After his commitment there ran out,
    he was over 26 and no longer eligible for the draft. He also never did that
    kind of work again!!!

    FACT: That’s how he beat the draft and that’s how he ended up in
    Maine.

    With his uncle so close to the powers that be in Washington,
    D.C. and then his uncle working on the Armed Services Committee, it is basic
    common sense that this be pursued by the Maine media. How did Angus
    King get a next to impossible to get deferment from military service?

    1.  Don’t hold your breath waiting for the Maine media to pursue anything.  They are the least curious bunch of “journalists” in history.

  17. Wolly – type in “windfarms dead birds” into your browser.  You will see that quite a bit of the windfarms iin California get shut down for 3 – 6 months a year because they were killing so many eagles, hawks, songbirds and bats.  It’s funny that the EPA will fine an oil company or any other industry millions of dollars for killing just one bird, but these killers get a complete pass from the govt for killing thousands of birds.  Do a little research.

      1. Suuuuure….domestic cats kill eagles and hawks all the time. 

        Relying on windmills for power is a joke.  We’d be better off using fairy dust and unicorn farts.

    1. That’s the best you can do? There are rules, laws and regulations. You can’t just make a TV commercial that is not backed up by fact:

       Defamation—also called calumny, vilification, traducement, slander (for transitory statements), and libel
      (for written, broadcast, or otherwise published words)—is the
      communication of a statement that makes a claim, expressly stated or
      implied to be factual, that may give an individual, business, product, group, government, religion, or nation
      a negative or inferior image. This can be also any disparaging
      statement made by one person about another, which is communicated or
      published, whether true or false, depending on legal state.

  18. King might not be the best candidate for Senator, but he’s better than the alternatives. Summers would only bring more partisan gridlock to an already impotent Senate. None of the others has a chance. King is the lesser of the evils and just possibly could do some good for Maine.

  19. Recently I was interested in buying some lake front property outside the Town of Lincoln.  Guess what turned me off ?  That’s right the wind turbines going across the mountains.  Thanks Angus for destroying a beautiful view.

    1. I was out there this summer.  Those bleeping windmills were disgusting!   They weren’t even turning on an exceptionally windy night in which we had to be extra careful with our campfire.  Wth, are they there for if they aren’t even turning on windy evenings?

      I love how the enviro’s buy into wind power hook, line and sinker, even though windmills are anything but “green” with all the destruction they cause.

  20. Poor Angus!  Maine voters have begun to learn he is not the white knight he would like them to think he is!  So he has to go to DC to find friends to fund his attempt to fool Maine voters – not surprising.

    So he got a nice sweetheart government guaranteed loan (you know – like Obama’s Solyndra) and now the taxpayers could be responsible for repaying the loan if Angus and the other “investors” choose to walk away from it.  Nice huh!

    Does anyone wonder why the normal electric utilities in Maine are not fighting wind power?  The reason is simple.  Wind power is not competitive economically – and probably never will be even on land much less when floated off shore.

    We need to get back to reality and continue to develop hydro and tidal generation!

    Goodbye Angus!  You ducked the nomination process by calling yourself an independent.  It didn’t work!  Now voters are realizing you are a democrat pretending to be a squeaky clean “independent!”

  21. This just makes me more convinced not to vote for King.  All the old Dems are holding fundraisers for hm now. Sick of the same old same old.

  22. He has favorability among Republicans? It says, “King has said he banked about $212,000”, could he had losses or had stock options, just wondering.

  23. Mr King has a valid point!!  Why is it that the Republicans seem  compelled to air disingenuous ADs? Could it be that they themselves have much to hide? Judging by what’s coming out of the GOP presidential race..I would say YES!

  24. Poor Angus, he thought he had the election all wrapped up.  As governor, Angus passed laws that forced us to buy the more expensive wind power, knowing full well it would be a scam for him to get rich off the taxpayers backs, once his term expired.  Well, now that Angus’s scam against the Maine people has been revealed, he doesn’t stand a chance at winning the Senate Seat.  I’m voting for Summers! 

    1. Senator Summers.

      Has a nice ring to it, even though it surely wakes fancy-lad King up in the middle of the night.

    2.  King thought he could waltz back to Maine in his Mercedes RV, smile big, shake some hands, ignore his horrendous record as Maine’s governor, and pretend he made no money from his green energy and wind fat-cat connections.

      King thought Snowe’s US Senate seat was his, just for the taking. He thought it was for sale to the highest bidder. He thought he could come back to Maine, and pretend to be one of the “common people,” while tooling around Maine in his $130K Mercedes RV. How insulting.

      What King didn’t realize, is that the internet has totally changed the face of politics, forever. Maine citizens now have instant access to the real, unvarnished truth about King. That includes leaving Maine with a billion-dollar deficit, and his lousy dealings behind the scenes on wind farms and energy schemes.

      King thinks Maine is for sale, and he’s wrong.

  25. King and his Godzilla ad – did he really consult Godzilla about the use of the giant lizard’s image and voice in his TV ad. 

    Does King really own a crown – and wear it?

    King does tell a good story. He’d certainly distract a lot of people in Washington from real issues.

  26.  It’s ironic how an individual who wants to protect the environment by utilizing alternative energy sources, is willing to ravage Maine’s natural beauty to accomplish it.  It becomes more absurd when this confused individual wants to represent the state at the federal level.  The people of Maine are tired of selling out, Mr. King.  There are other ways to create positive change in energy use, that could have real benefits to Mainers.  Explain to us how you plan to bring businesses and permanent jobs to our state and country. Not how you plan to expand government subsidies of technology that provides little return on investment, and creates temporary jobs.  Don’t forget, our hard work pays for all of this.  Please don’t tell me I have to work harder just “for the greater good.”

    1. To be fair, all the various forms of energy production have some impact on the environment. Oil fields do, mountaintop coal mining not only takes off the top, but typically pollutes streams below, hydroelectric dams have a huge footprint, solar plants do, tidal generators may disturb marine life, spent nuclear fuel remains toxic for thousands of years.

      I remember driving through rural Nevada some years back, out in the middle of nowhere, and was surprised to find a gigantic coal-fired electric plant. Later it was learned that all the power produced was sent to southern California – the plant was in Nevada because of the clean air. It couldn’t be located near Los Angeles.

      If society is going to use electricity, and I think that we will, and continue to increase our demand, then we need to honestly weigh the impact of all the types of generation.

      1. I don’t disagree with you at all, in fact I think we’re on the same page. We definitely need to honestly weigh energy solutions. Never stated that other forms of energy production have little or no impact on the environment. I stated that the wind programs currently in place have little or no benefit to Mainers.

    1. In earler times, snake-oil salesmen , land-grabbers and other scoundrels were hung by the nearest tree limb when caught.
      Now we use the first amendment and voice our displeasure to the unsavory types running for office Nov 6th. 
      So be it for all of King’s ilk.

    1. According to Urban Dictionary, the NRSC was tossing a compliment Angus’s way:

      Smooth Operator:

      “Someone who can handle multiple situations in a
      fashion that can only be described as “Awesome, spectucular, and, above
      all else, awesometacular”.

      Usually a smooth operator is someone who tends to be “on top of things”, and is usually in control of any given situation. If he/she isn’t in control of a situation, they usually find a way
      to gain control of it to make it more awesome for everyone involved.

      Smooth Operators are rarely in trouble, and, when they are, they can
      usually get out of these situations quickly, elegantly and with a zero
      percent chance of casualties… ”

      I’d have a hard time threatening to sue anyone that was calling me “awesometacular.”

  27. King’s record speaks loud and clear concerning a failed legacy that has bequeathed this mildewed remnant of average intellect with taxpayer tributes for too many years. This is a man who has cleverly  mastered the art of deception, while devouring scores of healthy hosts much like a swarm of slime eels intent upon any orifice in a storm. He is distasteful for any number of reasons, but the most compelling rationalization why he should not be considered as a viable  candidate is because he has soiled his political drawers with irresponsible and selfish behavior that is there for anyone to examine, if they can only stand the stench.

    1. What is a fact as you state is that Angus King DID make millions off of our backs, and got Caught!
      In earlier times, snake-oil salesman, land robbers and scoundrels were hung by the nearest tree limb.
      His only consequence is that he has finally been exposed for what he is.
      Now let the first amendment and the people decide on Nov 6th who he is and what his political future will be.
      We are all fortunate that our founding fathers knew the power of the First Amendment in a free society, and codified it in the Bill of Rights.
      Only despots  scoundrels and kings try to control it.

    1.   I’m sure he’ll send you a thank you note as soon as he returns from his out-of-state fundraising trip.

      1. King only hates out-of-state money when it’s going to his opponents. Same for his dislike of political opinions from “people from away” — he only condemns their opinion when it doesn’t support his own campaign. King is a phony, a wind-farm fat-cat, and he was a terrible Maine governor.

  28. It seems to me if the TV companies follow the law(?) the ads must be mostly true.  Maybe King should try to explain his involvement  rather than cry like a typical politician.  Most of ME’s problems sound like they go back to when he was Govenor, but that is politcal talk too, so who really knows.

  29. Angus King, threats will get you nowhere, it is the follow through that counts. Quite a broad span in your accountable millions$, 5.3 and 23.6, research shows that Roxbury’s “tax break” will be short lived, due to the tax value increase caused by the wind project. When the state cuts back on their contributions to the town, taxes will go up. That is a real concern for residents. Seasonal residents pay taxes, yet have no vote to how the town spends those taxes or how industry moves in on the ridge lines changing the “Quality of life”. These tax payers without representation have a right to be Mad as Bloody Hell. Mr. King wants voted in because his subsidies are in question as to be renewed in Washington. It has been voted down at least thrice.All these  subsidies have done is create havoc in small towns and divided residents. 
         Mr King, grow up and stop your Boo Hooing. You yourself couldn’t put a legal add together for TV, forgetting disclaimers, so let the Republicans have some fun and vent.  Your money can’t buy you a good track record with the public. You have to earn that on your own. Maybe, if you spoke to the people with out your smooth tongue, the people just might respect you and see the clear picture. Just be straight with them and open your books. Privatization of federal funds will always ruffle feathers in the time of financial depression of the common citizen.

    1. Good points. King and his green energy cronies have made a fortune off the backs of American and Maine taxpayers, with their Federal loans, grants, and paybacks. To what end? CMP just raised their transmission rates by over 19%. Maine mountaintops have been irrevocably scarred. Now, King wants us to send him to DC, where he can get his hands on the *real* energy money. No thanks.

      Meanwhile, the hilarious thing about King’s caterwauling on the tv ads, is that every time he voices a complaint, the ad views go up 1,000%.  His campaign is currently engaged in a failure on every single point of Campaigning 101.

      Paul Carrier said that King is “thin-skinned and controlling,” and those are never good qualities in a public leader.  The King campaign removed that comment from the PPH Colin Woodard article, when they whitewashed the article on their campaign site.

      http://www.pressherald.com/news/King-alters-newspaper-article-on-website.html

      Then his campaign threw a GOP staffer out of a press conference yesterday, even though it had been publicly announced. What are they hiding?

      http://www.asmainegoes.com/content/king-files?page=10#comment-651235

      King’s self-interest and controlling nature is steadily eroding his prior campaign chances.

  30. BDN – why no mention of the King coverup on negative details in the PPH Colin Woodard article?

    http://www.pressherald.com/news/King-alters-newspaper-article-on-website.html

    Why no mention of the King campaign denying entrance to a member of the public at the publicly-announced press conference on Monday?

    http://www.asmainegoes.com/content/king-files?page=10#comment-651235

    What is King hiding from the public? Why is the King campaign so determined to shut out public scrutiny, and to whitewash King’s record and his real aims in DC?

  31. What is a fact as we all see  is that Angus King DID make millions off of our backs, and got Caught!
    In earlier times, snake-oil salesman, land robbers and scoundrels were hung by the nearest tree limb.
    His only consequence is that he has finally been exposed for what he is.
    Now let the first amendment and the people decide on Nov 6th who he is and what his political future will be.
    We are all fortunate that our founding fathers knew the power of the First Amendment in a free society, and codified it in the Bill of Rights.

    Only despots, scoundrels and kings try to control it.

Leave a comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *