Gov. Paul LePage is right to say Maine needs natural gas. But getting more of the clean-burning, affordable fuel into the state will require a continued long-term effort on the part of not just the government, but also businesses, industrial operations and residents.
Natural gas pipeline networks are market-driven and will be built only where there is the demand to justify the cost of building them. The reality is that natural gas will likely not be piped to every rural area of the state. But, with oil currently costing about eight times as much as natural gas on an energy-equivalent basis, gas will become a greater part of the energy mix. Maine should be prepared to take advantage of the inexpensive resource to not only heat more homes but, when possible, generate more electricity and power vehicles.
Natural gas distributors need to build the infrastructure now in areas where it’s viable to do so, which may create more demand and more opportunities for different uses. The process is currently on standby in central Maine, where Summit Natural Gas of Maine and Maine Natural gas are awaiting a decision from the state’s Bureau of General Services on which distributor will build an Augusta-area pipeline.

Natural gas is present in portions of Maine’s more populated areas. Unitil delivers natural gas to parts of the Portland area, Lewiston, Auburn and Kittery. Bangor Gas serves parts of Bangor, Brewer, Old Town, Orono and Veazie. Maine Natural Gas serves parts of Windham, Gorham, Bowdoin, Topsham and Brunswick. In addition, natural gas is the dominant fuel for electricity generation in Maine and has accounted for at least 40 percent of generation since 2001, according to the U.S. Energy Information Administration. In Portland, about half the bus fleet runs on natural gas.
Expanding the current piping network is complicated because putting in lines will mostly be up to private companies — although public entities can pursue doing so as well — and potential usage must to be high enough to warrant construction. No bank or investor will loan a company the money to build a line if the company can’t demonstrate its anticipated return; the Maine Public Utilities Commission requires a great enough demand, too. So this is where the matter gets local.
Town officials can work with interested pipeline developers and educate their communities about realistic benefits. Some industrial users, such as mills, have already found a way to operate with natural gas — either by connecting to an existing line, trucking in compressed natural gas or using it to generate electricity on site — but some have not yet made the change. They can examine whether to do so and be prepared.
Residents, landlords and business owners can educate themselves about what it will take, financially and logistically, to convert their heating systems or burners. They should check into getting home energy audits and be aware of whether they could qualify for low-interest loans from Efficiency Maine. And pipeline distributors can make every effort to build out their systems in every area that wants natural gas — as efficiently and safely as possible.
The state’s role is to ensure that projects meet technical and safety guidelines and to be responsive to the needs of potential customers, in addition to any unnecessary regulations. This year, for example, the Legislature passed a law allowing natural gas pipelines to be built for private use by a single customer.
In many parts of Maine, natural gas can’t get there fast enough. In the Bangor area, for example, the demand is so high that Bangor Gas — which connects to the Maritimes & Northeast Pipeline — has at least 100 customers it can’t hook up each year because of the short construction window. The demand spiked in 2008 in response to the price spread between natural gas and oil, and the company has been installing up to 1,000 new customers each year. Customers generally see a return on their initial investment in one to three years.
Natural gas has been a lifesaver for many businesses. Paul Cook, a commercial property owner in Bangor, said converting his large buildings to natural gas allowed him to keep rents stable and complete needed repairs as operating costs increased. He was able to save $100,000 in five years. “It would be like hitting a grand slam home run in the last inning of a championship game. That’s how big it’s been,” he said.
Futures traders predict that natural gas prices won’t stay as low as they are now, but they will likely remain competitive with oil. If they are correct, and if deposits in places like the Marcellus Shale in Pennsylvania and off Sable Island in Nova Scotia are as full as they’re estimated to be, and if states and the country can continue to address the politics of environmental concerns, it makes a lot of sense to build out natural gas infrastructure in Maine. Natural gas is not as clean as renewable energies, like solar, but it burns cleaner than coal and oil. The combustion of natural gas produces mainly carbon dioxide and water vapor, while coal and oil release higher levels of carbon emissions, nitrogen oxides, sulfur dioxide and ash.
As older coal plants in New England are retired, Maine can build bigger natural gas lines better able to support the generation of more electricity. It will also need more infrastructure if it’s going to build compressor stations to provide natural gas to long-distance truckers and more bus fleets. Many homes, long dependent on heating oil, want to switch. In addition to making the state more attractive to businesses considering moving here, expanding natural gas infrastructure allows Maine to reduce its dependence on fuel from volatile regions of the world. Natural gas is a resource worth using to its fullest potential.



Every single penny WASTED on corrupt wind power could be wisely invested to expand the NG infrastructure. Gas is a clean, efficient domestically produced energy source.
I agree. Natural gas trumps industrial wind any day of the week. Real dispatchable power and the real ability to “wean us off of foreign oil”. We switched to natural gas in our business and have saved 60% in energy costs. That’s huge.
I’m a fan of natural gas (much cleaner than oil), but I wonder if it will simply go the way of big oil and oil speculators inflating prices once people switch over. The U.S. only gets a small fraction of its oil from overseas. Most of the oil pumped in North America is exported because big oil can get higher prices elsewhere in the world.
We have plenty of oil right here. How about some regulation that keeps more U.S. oil in the U.S.?
While it is correct to indicate there is a shortage of natural gas distribution pipeline infrastructure in Maine, the first paragraph of the editorial implies there is a shortage of natural gas in Maine. That is incorrect.
There is no shortage of natural gas flowing through the Maritimes & Northeast Pipeline; otherwise, there would be no distribution pipeline expansion going on in the state. The Canaport LNG terminal is operating at only around 30% of capacity. If demand were greater, Canaport’s imports and output would be greater. The same can be said for the Everett LNG, Northeast Gateway, and Neptune LNG terminals in Massachusetts. Everett LNG’s output has been declining, and Northeast Gateway and Neptune virutually nonexistent, due to the vast sea of domestic natural gas on Maine’s doorstep.
Natural gas pipeline infrastructure is currently being expanded to deliver more of the Marcellus Shale natural gas to the Northeast and New England. The Federal Energy Regulatory Commission’s Office of Energy Projects just released their Natural Gas Highlights update for July, indicating nearly 1 billion cubic feet per day of additional capacity was either just placed into service or application filed. Over 30 new pipeline and pipeline expansion projects for the Northeast and New England have begun development or have been completed within the past year.
Robert, you are confusing me. I was under the impression that you were dead set against LNG. Now it seems that you are promoting Irving Oils facility in Saint John, N. B..
Is it just the thought of an American company in Washington County putting American citizens to work that upsets you?
Thanks for this opportunity to clarify your misunderstanding.
Save Passamaquoddy Bay has never taken a position opposing LNG, per se, as has been obvious in our filings to FERC, the Maine Board of Environmental Protection, my participation at the US Coast Guard’s invitation in their Waterway Suitability Assessment Committee, our news releases, op-ed articles, and online comments.
We have advocated for years that Downeast LNG site at a location that complies with LNG industry terminal siting best practices (SIGTTO). Downeast LNG has refused. Save Passamaquoddy Bay’s opposition to Downeast LNG (and the other two local projects that were thrown out of permitting by FERC) has nothing to do with American jobs versus Canadian jobs, although project supporters try to make that an issue.
Had Downeast LNG (or the other two failed proposals) followed its own industry’s advice, there might already be an LNG terminal in Washington County, although it — like Canaport LNG, Everett LNG, Northeast Gateway, and Neptune LNG — would now be suffering due to the vast abundance of domestic US natural gas sitting virtually on Maine’s doorstep.
yes get rid of the awful wind scam that is ruining out beautiful State now please..
see what the science writer says on the homepage of this website
same thing happening here
http://turbinesonfire.org
If we had the Robbinston LNG maybe we could get natural gas to the homes in Robbinston, Perry ,Pembroke and Calais and the rest of the surrounding areas.
It is imperative for all Mainers that intend to vote in November to do some research into the positions of all the candidates on Wind and Natural Gas for our state. It is pretty clear that Angus King and any Democrat will continnue to support the Wind scam that has been foisted on us over the last four years. Governor LePage and the Republican candidates have all called for a moritorium or at least slowing down the waste and corruption Wind has used to level our mountaintops, disrupt our wilderness, kill our wildlife and ruin our sense of tranquillity and beauty.
We as Mainers have a choice . . . do a little research for yourselves. Find out how Industrial Wind does NOT contribute to clean energy. Wind companies are planning to put up more than 2,500 more towers covering more than 900 miles of our mountaintops in Maine. Our electric rates have already jumped between 12.5% and 19.8% to cover the “grid upgrade” to facilitate the turbines, an upgrade we really don’t need if we were to develop more stabile, reliable and continuious power. We do have a choice!!! We need serious people in our government that will ask questions, not just rubber stamp environmentalist BS. Though Angus King has stepped down from his position at First Wind, he still has family involved and has taken huge sums of taxpayer cash for this folly. Please be informed!
Minor correction. You say Angus King has stepped down from First Wind. Angus King, who believes he alone will save the country by being Senator, was the principal in Independence Wind, which destroyed the mountains of Roxbury with the Record Hill Wind project. But you were just confused about the family business of ripping off the taxpayers for the wind farce, as his son Angus S. King III is Vice President for Mergers and Acquisitions at First Wind.
Can you point out which mountains have been destroyed? To my knowledge they are all still there. I don’t think they are strip mining for wind.
The wind developers are strip mining our wallets.
Google “What every Maine ratepayer needs to know”.
Wind Power IS working for Walmart, maybe you should boycott them!
http://finance.yahoo.com/news/walmart-introduces-industrial-wind-turbine-172300557.html
Please answer the question. You anti-windpower people keep repeating that the mountains have been destroyed yet present no evidence of this.
Take a ride to Mars Hill, the windmills are a wonderful addition!! Windpower is a joke anyway you look at it!
Been there, the mountain is still there.
How does it look?
Hydro and natural gas are our future for the forseeable future for Maine. Wind and solar have been exposed for the scams they are and shouldn’t even be part of the conversation.
How do you feel about fracking and oil spills? You can’t have a balanced conversation in support of any energy policy without also considering the downside of combustible fuels energy.
“I’d put my money on the sun and solar energy. What a source of power! I hope we don’t have to wait to run out of coal and oil before we tackle that.” -Thomas Edison 1931
Yup, and 81 years later solar and wind are still a pipe dream for grid scale generation. Recent studies out of Germany have shown that even with a 20 year head start on the US and with the world reknown engineering that Germany has, their current massive wind power effort has resulted in only achieving 17% of the turbines’ nameplate capacity. The laws of physics prohibit wind from ever being a reliable and worthwhile investment, and neither solar or wind will ever be a base load energy source.
Warning North Africa can create enough free energy for the entire world thanks to solar energy, but corporations don’t want you to know that because oil, coal and uranium are their most profitable markets.
http://www.scientificamerican.com/article.cfm?id=can-north-africa-light-europe-solar-power
http://www.dailyfinance.com/2009/07/20/the-550-billion-solar-project-in-north-africa-a-reality-check/
YUP, and the oil companies bought up all the patents for the 100 MPG carbuerators!
A simple residential hot water solar system would take somewhere around 13 years for payback, that is a fact. At this point and time solar is for the people with money that want to feel warm and fuzzy, that also is a fact!
I had no idea! I need to educate myself so I can be as smart as you! Do you have a link so I can start educating myself? Thank you so much!
You’re correct, you have no idea. Perhaps you could educate yourself before you comment again? No I will not give you a link, please find a link yourself it would be good practice for you..
No link = Not verifiable
Logically you or anyone has no idea how much energy costs will be in 3 to 5 years.
Here you go no need to thank me this says 3 to 4 years:
http://www.house-energy.com/Solar/Costs-Payback-Solar.htm
“The payback period for solar hot water applications is short for the simpler designs. In very favorable cases (associated to favorable climate conditions) 3 or 4 years paybacks are possible. In colder climates the paybacks can double those numbers.”
Typical, google solar and post the first link that pops up. please post the negative ones as well. Nice try! As I said do your research and please don’t get you info from a manufacture or someone selling these systems when you do.
PS: I live in Maine…. Maine is not a “favorable case”. Good luck!
Natural gas powered electricity generation versus wind power is an absurd comparison. In the Bangor Area, the “Maine Independence Station” is a 520 MW combined cycle gas fired generator, sitting on a 30 acre parcel. The plant was built in 2000 for $300 million at a site that already had transmision lines. It cranks out predictable, reliable megawatts 24/7 as a base load facility. Unless you are looking for it, very few people see it tucked away on the river side in Veazie.
To equal this output would mean 1800 wind turbines, sprawling over 300 miles of ridges that are blasted away and leveled. 50,000 acres would be clearcut. Hundreds of miles of new transmission lines would criss cross the state like a spider web. Cost would be more than $5 billion! These projections are based on the impacts and costs of existing Maine wind projects.
Everywhere we would go, the looming presense of turbines the height of Boston skyscrapers (Vestas V100 turbine: 479 ft tall; the tallest building in New England, Boston’s John Hancock tower: 790 ft. tall) will dominate the views of our beautiful state. Lastly, the problem that plagues wind power would still be there. It generates electricity only when certain conditions prevail. It is unpredictable, unreliable, and non-dispatchable.
I will take cost effective, reliable gas fired electricity generation over the fickle folly of wind any time!
Thank you for the correction. The web that has been woven by the perpetration of the Industrial Wind Scam on the State of Maine by this family is truly disgusting. Angus told our legislators that we were the “Saudi Arabia of Wind”. That is a lie as are all the other reasons he gave us to line his pockets with taxpayer $$$.
Maine’s wind per square mile is 89% below the national average Shiek Angus.http://www.windtaskforce.org/profiles/blogs/a-letter-to-the-legislature
SEE:
http://www.windtaskforce.org/profiles/blogs/angus-king-maine-is-the-saudi-arabia-of-wind
While natural gas is currently fairly low cost in the US, that is about to change. Cheneire Energy has a huge facility in Sabine, Texas that was designed for import of natural gas. Now that large reserves have been found in the US they have applied for a permit to Export natural gas. Japan and Europe are willing to pay a much higher price per unit than the US market.
Once US originated natural gas has access to the world market, our prices will rise accordingly. Remember these companies have no obligation to sell to the US, they will sell to the highest bidder.
There is no such thing as “American Energy”, the “I’m an energy voter” commercial that are constantly airing are a bold faced lie. The US public needs too wake up and realize that .
and that’s one advantage of wind power – from land and sea. We won’t be exporting it overseas. Other fuels such as oil and gasoline from the US are currently being exported, and yes, LNG is next, making our prices for these commodities subject to the world market. Wind power won’t have that liability. Welcome to the global economy.
Natural gas isn’t ANY cleaner than oil. The natural gas companies don’t want you to know that and that’s why they decided to put the word “natural” to make it sound clean. Do some research. I’ve actually read some independent studies that say natural gas is worse for the environment than oil. What we need to do is develop better storage mechanisms for renewable energies, and slowly make the transition. An investment in renewable energies will be costly now.. But within ten years it will have payed for itself and we will be on the right track. After ten years we could all have free electricity.. Natural gas is what is causing all of our sinkholes. Does no one care about our environment anymore? I agree that wind is a scam and I would not want a wind turbine near my home. We need to find a better way to use wind energy. Hydro, solar, tidal, geothermal, and other renewables are the answer. NOT natural gas
Natural gas has no particulates pollution and far less carbon than coal or oil.
I’m all for natural gas, and we are developing fields in the US. The problem is that the unit price is low in the US (good for consumers, bad for gas companies). Natural gas is going onto the world market because if the companies can make greater profits overseas, then the gas will go overseas. Cheniere Energy has a huge facility in Sabine TX (they don’t mind industry, or windmills in TX) that was built for LNG import. Now that new fields have been developed in the US Cheniere has applied for a permit to EXPORT LNG. These companies have no loyalty to the US, they will sell the gas to the highest bidder, period. What you are seeing is a temporary low in natural gas prices, once our gas hit’s the world market a correction will be made to bring our unit price “in line” with the world demand. (Remember Japan shut down all it’s nuke plants, and India has a huge appetite for LNG).
There is no such thing as US ENERGY, the quicker everyone realizes that the quicker we can find a solution.
Natural gas is not clean energy. It is cleaner than coal. Renewable energy is clean.
The cost of natural gas will rise quickly once the infrastructure to deliver it is in place. The cost will also rise when fracturing is regulated. The cost of the damage to the environment also needs to be factored into the true cost of natural gas.
Electricity produced from renewable sources , wind and solar, is clean and inexpensive. We are in transition moving from dirty polluting fuels to clean sustainable energy. The fossil fuel industry is trying to slow the movement to clean energy by mounting a propaganda campaign to discredit the competition.
Today a home owner can gain energy independence. If you have a home that is open to the south call a solar electric company and ask for a site survey and a quote for a PV system. Call a heating contractor and ask for information regarding air source heat pumps. Ask the heating contractor about air to water heat pumps for domestic hot water.
If you do this you will find that solar and new 21st century heating technology is far less expensive than continuing to rely on fosill fuels.
Wind inexpensive? Are you nuts?
Even Walmart thinks it can make money off of wind power
http://finance.yahoo.com/news/walmart-introduces-industrial-wind-turbine-172300557.html
No I’m not nuts. Wind is a competitive source of energy. If we don’t support renewable energy we will prolong our dependence on fossil fuels. Our pursuit of oil, coal, and gas lead us to wars and a looming climate catastrophe. Electricity produced from renewable sources is cheap.
patom1: Open your eyes and take a ride along the roads they have blasted out of the clear cut mountaintops where these wind machines stand. Rollins Mountain, Bull Hill, Spruce Mtn, Stetson Mtn, Saddleback, Black Mtn, Kibby Mtn, Mars Hill are just a short list of the destruction that has been done. Brad Blake has some fantastic pictures of the process where they have put these monstrosities. http://www.windtaskforce.org Get off your couch and take a ride. But then again, maybe you can’t be objective. Maybe you are involved in the Wind Scam.
“I’d put my money on the sun and solar energy. What a source of power! I hope we don’t have to wait to run out of coal and oil before we tackle that.” -Thomas Edison 1931
The possibility of a chance explosion at a natural gas facility palls in comparison to the alterations created by the construction of wind power turbines. While turbines do not generally explode they can set sparks which will cause a forest fire when they fail. (not if they fail). I am neither a proponent nor an opponent of wind power but it seems humorous that for years, those who claimed that wind energy was the savior of the planet, cry foul when it is proposed for an area close to them. The same goes for LNG facilities which would provide jobs and resource availability for working Maine families. The NIMBYs have their little corner of what they consider the ideal, they just do not want anyone else to have the same opportunity.
The Scots are planing an off shore wind farm that will provide electricity to 40% of homes in Scotland. Compared to the threat posed by climate change the negatives associated with wind seem like a good deal.
wind produces 16% of what the actually numbers are.. You already know wind is trash yet you look to benifit yourself.
How is this a benefit to me other than the common good done by switching to clean renewable sources of energy?
Gas, not wind.