I won’t lie to you. I felt bad for the singing lady and her smitten friend.
They came bobbing down Walnut Street in Lewiston at about 10 p.m. They were half-walking, half-dancing down the sidewalk. Hand-in-hand and singing a little. It had been a fun night at the bar, apparently and it was time to go home.
Good times. Except for the knot of a half dozen cops clogging the sidewalk between here and there. They wore shirts and windbreakers that announced ATF or MDEA in bright yellow letters. Their badges gleamed in the dingy downtown light. These were men (and one woman) of the law, no doubt about it.
The happy couple came to a stop on the sidewalk, tune dying on their lips. They greeted the cops with smiles but it was clear that this was an interruption to the merriment.
“Good evening,” one of the officers said. “Do either of you have warrants out? Are you on probation?”
In some parts of the city, it’s an odd question. On the lively end of Walnut Street it is not. The happy man and his lady knew what the cops were looking for, but they were confident they were in the clear.
“Not me,” said the still-smiling woman. “I haven’t even been arrested in two years.”
She sold me. If I was the one carrying a badge that night, I would have sent her on her way. But the policeman was not so trusting. He lifted a mic from his shirt collar and radioed in the particulars. Damn technology. It took less than a minute for the sad facts to come across the airwaves.
The woman didn’t have one warrant or even just two. There were three warrants filed in a local court for her arrest.
And so ended the glee of a night spent drinking in downtown Lewiston. The singing lady was handcuffed and taken to jail. Her lovelorn boyfriend stood a few feet away assuring her that he loved her and would see her when she was sprung. Then the cruiser pulled away, headed to the Androscoggin County Jail. The sad fellow moved on and so did the cops.
Another Friday night and Operation Hot Spots was grinding like a machine. I felt a bit of empathy for this woman and her lonely boyfriend but 90 percent of the criminals swept up in this rolling police movement provoke no such sympathy.
Men and women with pockets stuffed full of drugs for which they have no prescription. A guy with a loaded handgun walking up Pine Street. Men from Boston or New York who came to Lewiston to hide out from charges of drug dealing, shootings, robbery.
Operation Hot Spots has been sweeping up the kind of people that make it dangerous to walk the downtown streets at night. The kind of people you think about when you tell your daughter she can’t walk to the store by herself. The kind of people you imagine when you ponder the worst-case-scenario as you plot your course across Kennedy Park.
I’ve been working the night beat in Lewiston for 18 years now. I’ve seen a lot of police efforts come and go. Cop cards handed out to children around the municipal pool. Shiny medallions given to people who commit good deeds. Soft approaches to a hard problem. Good intentions, but when you got right down to it, they didn’t get a single felon off the streets and it was no less dangerous to walk the length of Pine Street after dark.
At a rather large meeting at the Community Center last month, the people who live and work downtown gathered with the cops to have their say. One of them stood up and said in a voice loud enough that he didn’t need a microphone: “You’ve handed out your little cards. You’ve had your little meetings. We’re sick of the friendly approach. We want to see criminals put behind bars where they belong.”
So far, dozens of those criminals have been provided accommodations at the county clink. The hoosegow, the gray bar hotel. Which means that in this summertime effort, the cops have been doing their jobs.
But what about the courts, that ultimate authority which picks up where the police leave off? What are they doing to maximize the street-cleaning efforts of Operation Hot Spots?
The man with the gun on Pine Street? A career felon. Sicced a dog on a police officer back in the 1990s. Been in all kinds of trouble since. This time, he was found with a loaded gun in an area populated by hundreds of people – many of them kids – at any given time. How did he fare? He was set free after just one day on $300 bail. Which means for at least one night, the singing lady with warrants was sleeping on a cot at the county jail while a more seasoned criminal with an apparent love of artillery was out walking among us.
You can draw your own conclusions, I imagine. You asked the police to start locking people up and they delivered. I guess now, someone needs to start asking the courts to chip in a little bit, too.



good for Lewiston
The cops can arrest all the criminals they want. It’s the DA’s and judges who need to get tough.
That is the truth, the whole truth, and nothing but the truth.
Agreed. How often on here do we see a story of someone getting a slap on the wrist only to go out and do the same thing again.
hard to get tough when that would be blatantly against our constitutional protections against wrongful search and seizure. would you rather live in a police state? go campaign for a constitutional amendment then.
The key word here is “suspected.” Innocent until proven guilty? Oh, my bad! This is America. Guilty until one can prove themselves otherwise by spending lots of money for a good lawyer. Welcome to America, home of the sheeple.
How about going to a guilty til proven innocent?
You don’t want that.
We fought a revolution to get away from that and other lousy ideas.
He was using sarcasm to draw attention to the fact that “getting tough” on crime can easily lead to violations of our civil liberties.
Let’s face it, guilty till proven innocent is what we have now.
Your slope is not just slippery. You are greasing it. Be careful how you step on it.
Well written article. The courts fail us so often.
Most of our judges were appointed because they were liberal; remember that in November.
I got excited for cutting down on theft, robbery and assault, and then saw I the photo of someone getting arrested for drug possession… oh well.
I hear ya, but it is all related
What is absolutely amazing is that so many people would gladly hand over their consititutional rights for the illusion of a little security.
The USA is a crumbling empire.
Yea, I was kind of wondering where probable cause was in all this…
Yes. You are the one person who noticed that about constitutional rights. All the others seem to be glassy-eyed in love with the idea of Fourth Amendment violations and blaming the courts for doing what courts are supposed to do. I suppose that eventually, one of this cheering section will be sucked up in the vacuum of law enforcement and suddenly realize that laws have less to do with enforcement than simple brutish control–all the while that the real drug dealers and murderers stroll on past the scene unscathed.
She seems very calm.
Perhaps she’s been in that position before?
Kudo’s to the citizen’s for speaking up and making their voices be heard and for the Lewiston PD for taking actually doing something about it.
Lewiston residents to police: Time to get tough on suspected
criminals PLEASE ADD BANGOR TO THAT LIST TOO.
Aug 15, 2012 06:10 am | Mark LaFlamme
“You’ve handed out
your little cards. You’ve had your little meetings. We’re sick of the friendly
approach. We want to see criminals put behind bars where they belong.”
I was born in Lewiston and attended St. Peter’s & St. Paul gamma school. I then attended Lewiston High and played hockey four years. I know Lewiston and that’s why I moved away. The politics isn’t to clean up the town but rather go through the motion and leave it at that. Downtown Lewiston is dirty, run down, terrible conditions, police do very little and the courts do even less. What a joke! My suggestions is to move out of Lewiston downtown and leave those problems behind and go live in a safe place for a change. Our politicians don’t care but will tell you what you want to hear when elections come and then do nothing once elected.
I like the new approach. However, there is that pesky observation about guns in the proximity of many people, including children. You can’t help yourselves, Iknow. You just have to have your anti-gun remark. If you had said something about a felon carrying a gun with the obvious intent to use it in his trade, that would be OK. But the remark you made makes me think that a citizens carrying a pistol for personal protection would be treated by you editorialists the same way the felon was.