LEWISTON, Maine — For days, doctors and nurses kept Caleb’s newborn son in a dark, quiet area of the hospital, where they hoped the baby’s opiate withdrawal would be relatively quick, relatively easy.
It wasn’t.
He spent 11 days in the hospital’s neonatal intensive care unit, where a rotating series of medical personnel tried to gauge his level of withdrawal by the intensity of his cries, the wateriness of his stools and whether he was wracked by jerks or tremors.
Caleb could only watch as his son cried and clenched his little body.
Doctors put the baby on medication to prevent potentially dangerous seizures. He was allowed to go home nearly two weeks after he was born, but he would stay on anti-seizure medication for months.
“I felt totally helpless,” said Caleb, an Auburn man who asked that only his middle name be used, in part because his son’s situation affects the whole family and, “We have caused them enough embarrassment over the years.”
Caleb’s wife — his son’s mother — was addicted to drugs when she gave birth.
Had he been born in 2005, Caleb’s son would have been a rarity in Maine, one of 165 babies affected by drugs.
But in 2011, he was one of 667 newborns affected by drugs — four times more than six years earlier.
In 2009, the latest year complete figures are available, more than 2 percent of all Maine newborns showed withdrawal symptoms. Experts say that number is likely higher today. As opiate addiction has ballooned in Maine, so has the number of babies paying the price.
For infants, it can mean days or weeks suffering through a withdrawal that can leave them shaking, vomiting and unable to eat or sleep. For the families, it can mean dealing with a sick newborn when Mom and Dad are already stressed and, sometimes, in the midst of battling their own dependence. For hospitals and state agencies, it means something new to watch for, new protocols to follow, new safeguards to put in place.
For everyone, however, the long-term consequences are less clear.
Withdrawal
Substance abuse has long been a serious problem in Maine. In recent years, addiction to opiates — including OxyContin and other prescription pain medication — has skyrocketed.
Although opiate addiction is an issue nationwide, Maine has the highest addiction rate per capita, according to the Maine Office of Substance Abuse. More Mainers now seek treatment for painkillers than for alcohol.
It’s unclear exactly why opiate addiction has become so prevalent in recent years. Some experts believe it’s because doctors prescribe painkillers too often and too readily, making it easy for people to get hooked. Others believe the pills’ prevalence in society has made them especially easy to illegally obtain and abuse. Teens can find them in their parents’ medicine cabinet, for example.
Others say too many people simply don’t realize the medication can be a problem until it’s too late.
“There’s a lot of education that needs to be done,” said Geri Tamborelli, nurse director of the Family Birth Center and NICU at Maine Medical Center in Portland.
Whatever the reason behind the increase in addiction, it’s clear that more infants are being exposed to drugs because of it. At Maine Med, for example, 18 newborns in 2001 went through such severe withdrawal that they had to be treated with medication. In 2010, that number was 120.
Between 2005 and 2011, the Augusta, Bangor, Lewiston, Portland, Rockland and Skowhegan areas saw the largest increases in babies affected by drugs, according to the state. The majority of those newborns were exposed to opiates.
When talking about infants and drugs, experts use the term “exposed to” or “affected by,” rather than “addicted to.” Addiction includes drug-seeking behavior, they say, and while a newborn’s body may be dependent on drugs, that infant isn’t drug-seeking like an addict.
In infants, opiate withdrawal can range from mild to severe. In the mildest cases, it can be difficult to tell an infant is in withdrawal. That baby might be a little fussier than other newborns. In severe cases, the baby can shake, vomit, have trouble eating and sleeping, have diarrhea and cry inconsolably.
“The great majority of symptoms are not lethal, but it’s inhumane to allow a baby to go through that,” said Mark Brown, chief of pediatrics and NICU medical director at Eastern Maine Medical Center in Bangor.
Babies in severe withdrawal are also at risk of seizures, which can potentially be dangerous.
Lacking a quick blood test or other concrete measure, hospitals have come to gauge a baby’s withdrawal by charting symptoms and giving each a score. Infants in mild withdrawal are typically watched closely for several days and placed in a dark, quiet area where they can sleep and be soothed. Infants in severe withdrawal can require placement in a NICU for days or weeks and require medication to prevent seizures and, sometimes, drugs to wean them.
Caleb’s son was about in the middle of the spectrum, leaning toward severe.
When he was born, the boy joined a family of four — Caleb, his wife and their two school-age children. Caleb had battled alcoholism. His wife, he said, had a problem with prescription drugs that started years before.
“I think she’s always had a problem with it, but after the first child she got prescribed it for help with her postpartum depression,” he said. “And then she was able to get it increased, then buy it off the street. She’s been to rehab several times.”
Caleb’s wife did not return calls seeking comment for this story. Husband and wife are separated.
Caleb said his wife got clean when she had their second child, but she struggled with addiction afterward. She was taking drugs when she became pregnant with her third child and went to rehab about halfway through her pregnancy, he said. She stayed on Subutex, a drug that, like methadone, is supposed to help addicts get through the dependency and cravings that come with opiate addiction.
Experts warn that women should not quit taking opiates or try to wean themselves off the drugs while pregnant. Without medication like methadone or Subutex to take the place of the opiates, they say, women are at high risk of delivering early, which can cause long-term health problems for the baby. They are also at risk of miscarrying.
Although newborns can go through withdrawal when their mothers take methadone or Subutex, that withdrawal is supposed to be more mild than with street drugs or prescription opiates.
Caleb said he and his wife spoke to her doctors while she was pregnant and advised them of her situation, as experts recommend. When their son was born in December, he seemed fine.
“The next day, everything was great,” Caleb said. “We didn’t see any signs of anything. We felt everything was going to be all right. They came to him and they scored him … and he was doing good. And then all of a sudden, it turned. It got so that he was clenched up. They didn’t like his bowel movement. He cried, excessive crying.”
To Caleb, already a father of two, his newborn son’s behavior didn’t seem far from that of a normal, fussy infant. But nurses rated him for withdrawal symptoms like rigidity and excessive crying, and those scores were too high.
For 11 frustrating days, Caleb watched his son lie in the NICU. Although experts say parents are usually encouraged to cradle and soothe infants going through withdrawal, Caleb said medical personnel at his hospital wouldn’t let him pick up his son. Finally, on Christmas night, the newborn’s withdrawal scores dropped. Doctors kept him on phenobarbital, an anti-seizure medication, but he was allowed to go home.
Six months later, Caleb’s son is off the anti-seizure medication. And though he’s not yet sleeping through the night, he has hit developmental milestones.
Caleb and his wife are separated. They share custody of the children.
“He’s a cutie,” Caleb said. “He seems healthy. Every doctor’s appointment we go to he’s healthy, but I am worried about the future.”
Hospitals, state respond
Although the number of drug-exposed newborns is on the rise in Maine, each case is different. Many are babies born to women who are getting help for their addiction and were taking methadone or Subutex during their pregnancy. Some are born to women taking prescription painkillers. Others are born to women who were in the midst of addiction and took whatever drugs they could find.
At Eastern Maine Medical Center in Bangor, which has seen one of the largest increases in drug-affected babies, most mothers of those infants took prescription drugs, methadone or Subutex. About 10 percent (“Far less than what you’d think,” Brown said) took street drugs or illicit drugs.
Many doctors and nurses now routinely ask expectant mothers if they’re using. They say some women lie about their drug use, but many are honest about it for their babies’ sakes. Whether or not women are honest, hospitals are required by law to call the Department of Health and Human Services when medical personnel suspect a newborn has been exposed to drugs.
It’s unusual for DHHS to place infants in foster care solely because they were born addicted to drugs. If a mother is getting help for her addiction, has a stable home life and a good support system, it’s likely the baby will be sent home with her. If caseworkers are concerned the baby could be abused or neglected because of the mother’s drug use, they could send the newborn home with the father, a grandparent or another relative.
DHHS has seen an increase in the number of children entering state care because of their parents’ drug abuse. In December, DHHS cared for about 1,500 kids. Last week, it cared for 1,609, a net increase of about 100 kids in six months.
“We have taken significantly more children in care, particularly in areas where substance abuse is a huge problem — Bangor, Rockland, coastal Maine, Biddeford,” said Therese Cahill Low, director of the Office of Child and Family Services.
As the number of drug-exposed infants grows in Maine, hospitals and state agencies are working on ways to cope. Written hospital protocols tell doctors and nurses exactly what they should do if a baby scores high for withdrawal. Special brochures tell parents and families what to expect if their baby is born exposed to drugs.
St. Mary’s Regional Medical Center in Lewiston is educating parents on the signs and symptoms of withdrawal and getting them involved with their newborns’ care plans.
“We don’t want them to come up here and then be like, ‘Oh, my god, we didn’t know we’d be staying for five days; we didn’t know what the baby was going to be going through. We didn’t know what the risks were,’” said Bobbie Olsen, patient care leader at St. Mary’s.
One thing that can be a surprise: the cost of care. It’s unclear how much money drug-exposed newborns cost the state, insurance companies or parents, but it is more than the cost of healthy newborns.
At St. Mary’s, for example, which doesn’t have a NICU and doesn’t care for infants in severe withdrawal, the average cost of care is $2,500 for a drug-affected newborn, compared with about $1,375 for a healthy newborn. Last year, 95 percent of the hospital’s drug-affected newborns were on Medicaid, compared with 23 percent of all babies born there.
At CMMC, the room rate for a healthy newborn is $550 a day. Most stay two or three days. Infants that may be drug-exposed stay at least five days. For those in withdrawal severe enough to require a stay in CMMC’s NICU, the room rate is $1,100 a day, and stays there can last weeks.
The critical factor: Home life
What does the future hold for those infants?
That answer is still up in the air.
About 13 years ago, a large federal study began following more than 650 drug-affected newborns as they grew up. The study found that prenatal drug exposure put the children at greater risk of developmental issues and other problems, but what mattered more was the child’s home life.
Infants exposed to drugs but raised in safe, supportive environments were likely to be OK. Infants exposed to drugs and raised in homes filled with chaos, violence, trauma and continued substance abuse were more likely to have problems.
“It’s crucial for any kid, but when you have a kid that has a known risk, it’s really important to think about what’s going to be the environmental support for that child,” said Cheryl Anne Boyce, associate director for child and adolescent research for the National Institute on Drug Abuse.
Researchers are following those children to see whether, as teenagers, they’re more likely to take drugs.
“We’re waiting for the next chapter,” Boyce said.
Doug Robbins, director of the Division of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry at Maine Medical Center, sometimes sees children who were exposed to drugs in infancy. Some of those children have attention problems and lower IQs. They can also have problems with mood regulation — which leads to more tantrums and emotional meltdowns. But like the national study, he said it’s difficult to tell whether the problems come from prenatal drug exposure or from living in a home affected by substance abuse.
“Inevitably, when people have those kinds of things going on, they have a million other problems going on that are known to have very negative effects on child development,” he said. “Drug abusers are drug abusers; they’re not only using one thing. No. 2: people who are using drugs are likely doing other things that are not good for them … it becomes a package of problems.”
For Low at the Office of Child and Family Services, the issue took on particular significance between Thanksgiving and New Year’s Day. That’s when six drug-exposed infants died in Maine — not from withdrawal but while sleeping with parents who were medicated or taking some kind of substance.
“For me, it’s so big on my radar because I get these emails when there is a serious injury or child death,” she said. “That was a horrific time period.”
DHHS is looking at ways to sooner identify families struggling with substance abuse — during pregnancy rather than after — so it can get parents help before their baby is born. It’s also working with the Office of Substance Abuse on plans for an intensive program that would give a small number of families 24-hour residential support and give a greater number of families outpatient education and services.
But experts say one of the biggest problems with getting families that help is overcoming the parents’ own shame. There’s a stigma to drug abuse. There’s a particular stigma to women who take drugs while pregnant.
“We’re really trying to involve the community and let the community know this is a problem and the solution lies within the community itself, as far as supporting these parents and not passing judgment,” Low said. “Because I’m afraid parents aren’t going to seek the help they need if they feel we’re going to take the child away or if they feel people are going to judge them.”
For more stories from the Sun Journal, visit sunjournal.com.



This story kills me….I will never understand how a mother can do this! I dont care how addicted you are….get fixed if your going to be taking harmful drugs!!! This is such a horrible thing to do to your child. A parent is suppose to protect not harm their own babies. I see the dad was there with his son…Where was this mom while her child was suffering??
Mom was probably out getting more drugs and looking for the father of her next kid.
The real problem Felicity that i see is that these women who are addicted to drugs actually go out and get pregnant in the first place. They should know better and should care about that child before getting pregnant. Unfortunately, as the numbers have proven, these mothers care only about themselves and their drug. The children should be removed and heavy child abuse charges should be levied against them.
I couldn’t agree more – I am sitting here shaking my head as I am reading the article… As a mother myself, I can not imagine doing anything that knowingly could bring harm to my child. For the sake of this little one in addition to her other two older kids, I really hope and pray this mom gets some help and gets her life on track… she has more than just herself to think about, that is for sure!
Again, she has to stay on the treatment to avoid miscarraige. THAT would bring more harm to the child than being born drug affected. Don’t think that I approve of any of it, but it IS in the best interest of the baby to continue with the treatment.
I read as far as this paragraph:
“When talking about infants and drugs, experts use the term “exposed to” or “affected by,” rather than “addicted to.” Addiction includes drug-seeking behavior, they say, and while a newborn’s body may be dependent on drugs, that infant isn’t drug-seeking like an addict.”
Drug experts that I know explained to me that the younger a body is the easier their brain can be addicted. These babies are addicted adn the only reason they aren’t out drug-seeking is because they are infants in a cradle.
IMO the mothers of these children should be put in prison and their children put up for adoption. Hopefully to people who are informed about what they will be dealing with as the child matures.
There are not enough foster homes.
It doesn’t matter WHY the patient isn’t out seeking drugs (in this case it is a baby who can’t walk), “addiction” is psychological and “affected by” is physical.
We need to get a handle on understanding addiction. It is time to look at this differently than we have been, because being mad & having a drug war isn’t working. When President Regan began the war on drugs Oxys were not even invented yet, proof it has only gotten worse.
I would like to see Big Pharma & these doctors putting this junk on the streets held more accountable. Audit the prescriptions they write just like the IRS audits a corporation. Somebody somewhere is putting too many pills on the street if patients have enough left over to sell. We need a new way.
It isn’t only doctors. Low life dealers on the street will sell anything. They are all over the State just like rats
Where do you think the low-life dealers get their pills from? Someone wrote a prescription.
Have you noticed how many drug store robberies were happening lately?
Many of them get them from a roach drug runner like the recently-deceased one from Florida. Pills come from all over the US. There’s just a fine market for it here. This has to be dealt with on a federal level. It’s not just Maine doctors.
Right. Blame anyone/everyone but the ones abusing.
But we have “blamed” them. In fact, thats all we do. It doesnt work. Get the money out and this sore will begin to heal. The big money keeps us stuck repeating failure. Pharma, police budget and trafficers all profit and we lose.
Is anyone really thinking the next tough law is gonna be the diference?
Are you refering to the “money out” that pays folks to stay home and receive payments? To pour good water out into the parking lot to turn the empties back in for the pittance it generates in hard cash? To the folks who car pool to Bangor’s Methadone Clinic in order to “keep” the travel money for themselves? To the folks who lie to a doctor in order to obtain drugs that they then sell on the street?
You’re dead on… it’s all about the money.
Addiction is a psychological AND a physical thing. The drugs that these people get addicted to are the ones that mimic the phrenoms (?) that are naturally released by the brain. Hence the rush. Once you get the brain used to the rush, it’s ability to release natural phrenoms is greatly reduced.
Every source of drugs knows this and that is why they have pushed their product to ever younger customers. That way they are insuring a never ending customer base.
So take the kids away from the abusers and hang the drug dealers! How many of our young are we going to let these low lifes ruin before we stop them? Maybe public execution is what it will take.
90% of these babies, they’re mothers were prescribed medications by a doctor only 10% are mothers using unprescribed drugs off the street…. the doctors should have some blame here.
Just because one is prescribed a drug, it does not mean that one has to become an addict.
I’ve had two knee replacements- which are incredibly painful- yet I am not addicted to pain medication. I didn’t take more than I needed to of the drugs that I was prescribed, and when I was feeling better, I weaned myself off them.
A majority of drug addicts become addicts because THEY choose to take the drug(s).
////
\\
With the exception of maybe Oxcontin, i have to respectfully disagree. I was prescribed that after my back surgery and asked for Percocets instead. The doctor thought i was crazy. Most of us know how extremely addictive Oxy’s are. That is likely why they are so popular amongst the dealers and drug abusers. I have been on both Vicodin and Percs for months and never became addicted. Unless those drugs are abused(taking them when pain no longer is there), i see no reason why one would become addicted.
Most of us that suffer debilitating pain do what you do. I go to Asprin or Tylenol as quickly as possible and then drop that as well. I had friend who had open heart surgery a few months ago. His ribcage was splayed open. He dropped all painkillers of any type by day three of his recovery.
” I have been on both Vicodin and Percs for months and never became addicted.” At what point do you decide you’re addicted? Years?
…………..
…………..
What’s the tolerance level of a fetus?
—————
You are correct -everyone is different and everyone has a different tolerance. But, that is where personal responsibility comes in… If you think you are starting to have a problem, go get some help, go see your doctor, do something, ANYTHING – but, don’t just sit back and say “I have an addictive personality, so I am destined to be an addict.” The question is, how many people are willing to do that and work through their problems (going to counseling, detox, etc…) VS “wallowing” in their addiction? You can make excuses or you can make a difference, which one is it going to be??
……..
Maybe, but sitting on the nest should be enough incentive to quit. There is nothing more important than one’s kids! Most parents would die for them and these Self-indulgent excuses for humans decide that they are more important. No sympathy for mommy here!
………..
I completely agree. I have had four knee operations and one back surgery and was prescribed Vicodin and Percocets for each of them….As soon as i was able to switch up to Tylenol or Ibuprophen, that is what i did. I didnt want to be addicted. I believe it is irresponsible to blame only the doctor. Patients are supposed to be responsible adults and therefore should act accordingly.
Most people addicted to prescription opiates know all the tricks in the book to get Dr.’s to write new scrips for them. There are a bunch out there who do what Rush Limbaugh got away with, Doctor Shop. Some addicts have 4, 5, 6, different doctors.
I agree! If that is the situation, Dr Feelgood should go to jail along with mommy.
…………
…………
I agree with prison! Think of the babies..not poor junkie mommy. That is child abuse of the worse form. I would go along with public flagging! Then they would have pain they can blame the drugs on.
……………………
Personally I favor Darwin’s solution.
…………………………………………..
Not my point.
We have been facilitating drug use. Even making it attractive and now we even pay for the drugs that addict babies. This sounds a lot worse than asking addicts be responsible for their own behavior.
If you are speaking of eugenics…. Try Margaret Sanger.
Margaret Sanger [[Image:Template:Country flag alias USA|22x20px|Template:Country alias USA]] — American birth control advocate, also sometimes advocated certain types of eugenic programs.
http://psychology.wikia.com/wiki/List_of_eugenicists
———————
No I am not calling for extermination. I am calling for an end to creating babies on methadone. Your policy seems to be excusing addiction.
“The greatest threat to Democracy lurks in the minds of men, well-meaning, but unknowing”. Alexis D’Toqueville
Really? If you were walking down the street and you saw a mother slapping the snot out of her baby, what would you do? Walk up and tell her that behavior was inappropriate and she should seek counciling? This is child abuse just like that father who squeezed his son’s head and killed him. No mercy..No chance for them to finish the job!
————————-
The excuses may vary but every case is the same in that every one that bears a child while doing drugs is giving birth to an addicted baby.
I really don’t care about the feelings, emotions, excuses, etc. What the mother is doing is criminal abuse to their own child.
…
Wether you or I care for these addicts will not amount to a hill of beans when it comes to their wellbeing or their path do recovery or death.
The only ones that matter are the addicts themselves. They have to start loving themselves enough to fight for their love of self. They are the key in any equasion relating to recovery. You can’t sugar coat it or excuse it or weasel one way or the other. You have to stop lying for and to the addict. The bare brutal truth is the only route out of addiction other than death.
An opiate adddicted mother will miscarry if she stops the medication while pregnant. It is unfortunate that anyone becomes pregnant while using, but methodone or suboxone treatment is really the only way to keep the baby alive.
So she carries the addicted baby to term. Then she should be arrested for abuse to her newborn. She should have the infant taken away unitl she proves that she is clean. If she insists on staying on Methadone or suboxin she should be willing to have her tubes tied to prevent another pregnancy resulting in another addicted baby.
These babies deserve better. There are thousands of couples who struggle for years just to have children and seeing this kind of behavior by irresponsible parents breaks their heart. Alcohol abuse or lack of involvement is just as bad. As a nation, we face a crisis of parenting – where mom’s and dad’s often won’t lead – often the father isn’t even in the picture to be a Dad. There are many loving couples who would gladly adopt these little ones. Get help and get things straight before you have kids – they really need their Mom and Dad.
DEAD BEAT PARENTS!!!!! I HAVE NO SYMPATHY FOR THEM AT ALL!! SHOULDN”T BE ALLOWED TO BEAR ANY MORE CHILDREN!!!
The life long health of a newborn child is put in jeopardy by the actions of it’s parents. Freedom without self discipline needs no introduction. Lets hope the next generation learns from the mistakes of others and incorporates the word “no” into their vocabulary.
James, Not as long as we continue to reward bad behavior…
This is disgusting! How can anyone do that to their own kid? Child abuse at it’s worse. It should be treated as such and the mother incarcerated, if not neutered. Moral of the story..If you are going to use drugs keep your legs crossed or go to jail where you probably won’t get pregnant and ruin another life.
It’s time to start locking these mother’s up for child abuse. This is disgusting.
Yes they should!! And that’s exactly what it is!!!
Well, we’re in Bangor, now home to four methadone clinics and countless housing projects. There is NO incentive for people to work. NONE. They get rides to get their fix, their medical bills are taken care of and they have a roof over their heads. Totally forgot food stamps. No worry, nobody is going hungry. Oh yeah, people of Bangor…did you know your taxes are going up again???
‘Many are babies born to women who are getting help for their addiction and were taking methadone or Subute”
What this means is the taxpayer is likely paying to get the child addicted to methadone.
You are so right and I know from my personal experience from a family..they claim the child isn’t going to affected but what about a mother who is breast feeding..the child is affected
and many are getting their free high, once the box runs out they are back to the street drugs and repeating the cycle.
I say get high as a kite, jump off the roof of the water tower, do what you want with the life you think is so bad that you need to self medicate. But why would you bring a baby in to your life if you are hooked on drugs and running from reality.
I feel so bad for the babies. You can be a great mom and teach life skills if you cant take care of your self and be greatful for every day on gods green earth. I dont see how.
I hope I am wrong…
Norplant should be required.
That has never helped and it is expensive. Law enforcement is useless to solve the problem or the trillion we have spent would have done it.
We are framing the problem all wrong. It is unsolvable by making laws. This has never helped.
I was reading this article and shaking my head and all the pain and suffering these little infants have to go through and then I realized, this is probably nothing compared the dysfunctional lives they will be living with these parents
More Aylas
You got it!
This is a horrible problem and my heart breaks thinking about all the innocent babies. My baby is a month old and she’s the greatest thing I’ve done.
However, it is totally inappropriate to blame the mothers in these situations. I can’t imagine any woman would begin to experiment with drugs while pregante. The truth is these woman have been pre-exposed to addition and their odds of falling back in are high.
Beyond the essence of addiction, it’s a socio-economic problem, and by the numbers, it’s growing. It’s hard enough trying to be ‘middle-class’ in the ‘post’-recession climate, the lower class is being pushed into oblivion. There are greater forces at work! Just remamber, these aren’t people injecting black-tar heroin, they’re taking opiates in convenient pills from big-pharma; it can start with just one ‘script.
Totally inappropriate to blame the mother?? Who took the drugs? The child?
The mother was an addict to begin with and she still chose to become pregnant. It IS her fault for bringing a drug addicted baby into this world.
Also, just because one is in the lower class it does not mean they need to become a drug addict.
…and it is this very line of thinking that has led to the problem. People need to be blamed and held accountable for their actions.
Why can’t the doctors, Big Pharma, the druggie moms & men who are getting druggies pregnant, all share the blame. There is certainly enough to go around. Then, after everyone feels good and self-righteous we can actually do something different about this growing problem, because what we have done so far has not worked.
Totally inappropriate to blame the mother???? The mother is the addict, it doesn’t matter where she got the drugs or who manufactured them. She made a choice to take them. And if she cannot be responsible enough to stop taking drugs, then she shouldn’t be getting pregnant. These kids are going to live lousy lives with lousy parents who think everything is someone else’s fault or problem.
Absolutely! As I said before, these women can get drugs to get high but not birth control??
NOT if these people are responsible!!!!!
people know when they are addicts. I am not judging them but they should NOT have children.
And then these poor kids start attending school where they’re likely to be behind and plagued by learning difficulties. More strain on an already strained system.
Addiction will never be ended until people accept God in their lives. I know society wants to marginalize religion, especially Christianity, and more especially, Catholicism. The teachings of the Catholic Church come directly from Jesus Christ and his apostles, who founded the Church. The teachings of the Catholic Church have good answers to all of the worlds’ problems, but most people are just flat out unwilling to accept that. Many people would rather continue wallowing in sin and unhappiness, instead of repenting of sin and living in the happiness that only a personal relationship with Jesus Christ can provide. It all boils down to a matter of choices. You can choose to follow Jesus Christ, and solve most of your problems (as sinful humans, we all still have to struggle with temptation to sin), or you can choose to reject him, and leave a lot of potential peace and happiness on the table.
please !!
A majority of my friends are not christian. None of them do drugs and none of them are addicted (other than a few of them smoking cigarettes). I know plenty of christians who would bash them for their nicotine addiction, but be very careful that you don’t have a twinkie addiction or a coffee addiction or something like that first. The problem is that people are not held accountable for their actions in the HERE AND NOW. Society is becoming too accepting of ducking personal responsibility. THAT is the problem and it really has nothing to do with a god as far as I can see.
oh that was great, Thanks. I needed that this morning.
Is that where all those Catholic priests get it from?
This has nothing to do with religion. addiction happens to people of all “religions” So-called “Christians” included.
===
How can you people sit there in judge. You don’t know why that mother was on drug. For all we know her doctor could have prescribed her those. It doesn’t take long to get addicted to painkiller. Do the research before you judge.
“Because I’m afraid parents aren’t going to seek the help they need if they feel we’re going to take the child away or if they feel people are going to judge them.”
…so nearly all of the people who have commented on this article are part of the problem. Way to go guys.
Big pharma makes enough drugs to profit from this epidemic. The illegality itself creates the other profit motive. We need something completely different. Legalize all drugs, invest in treatment and end the counterculture that stands in the way of progress.
We will know nothing but failure in this struggle until we stop expecting well intentioned cops to solve a health problem. Doctors can’t fight crime and policing can’t help fight addiction.
Lets stop the madness already. There has never been a shread of evidence this is working.
So tell us, how’s all the free drugs working out in Amsterdam these days?
Not free. Dispensed by people trained in harm reduction with knowledge of counseling and treatment options. Getting the dealer out means users dont have secrecy of the friend / dealer. Law enforcement lacks rhe skills and mission to help those involved. We have been stuck with the most ineffective and immoral approach and you can see what that has gotten us.
I appreciate the tenor, and thoughtfulness, of your reply.
I’m certain John Stossel, respected Libertarian, would agree with you.
However, I continue to reach another conclusion.
I learned early on as a State Senator, that if I’m willing to pay you to stay home and do nothing… you’ll not let me down.
In other words, whatever we reinforce or enable, we get more of.
Like the Opium Dens of ancient Asia, I can’t fathom an America with uncontrolled and widely available opiates, especially with our growing “safety net” legacy of the Great Society.
Legalize weed, but get a whole lot more cruel on everything else. (three years on a chain gang for the parents and limited visitation at best after that, & mandatory sterilization for second offences)
These women can get the drugs they want to get high and buzzed but not the birth control to prevent this horrible CHILD ABUSE?????? My God, this makes me so angry and I cannot understand this. I don’t care about the addicts. I have no sympathy for these people who get addicted. Don’t blame the damn doctors. A real doctor, an ethical doctor will monitor these people who are on presciptions. It’s not the doctors fault idf they just want to get high!! But these poor babies. God help them. And to return them right back into that awful atmosphere? God help us….
“…or if they feel people are going to judge them.” For a long time, societal disapproval was a means of keeping bad behavior to a minimum. It’s time that became the norm again — perhaps we might have far fewer people popping out illegitimate kids or youngsters suffering with addiction or other massive and preventable drains on the social network.
This may sound harsh, but addicts should NOT reproduce. It is well known that the baby will undergo withdrawal. This includes methadone users…..keep it zipped or use birth control. I feel so badly for these poor newborns who have no idea what is wrong, only know that they suffer. Even addicts should not want to see their children suffer. And the problems they encounter as they grow, are often huge. You are affecting that child’s whole life. Do what you want to your own mind & body- be kind to the unborn,
Harsh? There’s nothing harsh about it. It’s common sense!
I’m a foster parent to a 4 year old and a 15 year old, both born drug exposed, both from different mothers. Both have mental health diagnosis, have extreme behavioral issues and both suffer from severe learning disabilities. My 15 year old is reading at a 1st grade level and my 4 year old, despite going to preschool for a year, still can’t retain the names of colors or how to count to 10. This is with extensive special education services and tutoring outside of school (for the 15 yr old who desperately wants to learn to read). Both struggle with peer relations; often expressing frustration with aggression (4 year old by biting and 15 year old by severely assaulting). One mother goes to the Methadone clinic daily and the other is on Suboxen. Neither have every worked to my knowledge and have all of their housing, support services and transportation provided for free. They’ve both been offered countless drug rehab services and can even take college courses for free. They even get Christmas presents donated so that they can sign their name to them and give them to their kids. I work full time during the school year and spend many, many hours raising these damaged boys who I love with all of my heart and I don’t regret one minute of my decision to be a foster parent or to have taken these boys in. Although I would never let my foster sons know how I feel about their bio moms but I am very resentful that they brought these helpless children into the world with these disabilities which, although it can’t be proven yet, are likely due to their drug addictions, these mothers are costing the taxpayers thousands and thousands of dollars a month to support and seem to like their lives and have no desire to change.
It breaks my heart to know that these innocent babies come into the world paying for their mother’s “sins”
We can thank Angus King for allowing methadone into the state in 1996. At that time there were about 200 addicts, today Maine has 4,000 on methadone (this does not include suboxone or other drugs) and MOST are on mainecare. What does King say about this now?
This will not stop until people stop selling their scrips. No need to work when you can just sell your painkillers for $20-$30 each.
This headline and article certainly tell it all as far as the unborn being children, not a blob of tissue or “so much garbage,” as many have tried to make us believe in order to justify the over 54 million unborn babies who have been killed. At 10 weeks or 21/2 months gestation there is a heartbeat.
Why aren’t mothers being criminally charged for child abuse in the womb? Why aren’t the dealers, sellers and providers being traced and held accountable like a bar that sells alcohol to a driver who kills someone while drunk from the bar? We need the stricter enforcement? Why aren’t parents made to take drug tests before visitations after the child is in foster care? Why are there women with 4 or more children having been TPR’d and who still continue to give birth to drug affected children? This is a financial black hole for our state’s budget and a travesty upon our children.
Addiction and the treatment for it is expensive and in some cases life-long. My only comment here is that our youngest citizens, tiny newborn babies, have to withdraw from addictive drugs. They had no “free will” to decide on using drugs, or not. They bacame addicted because their mothers fed drugs into them through an umbilical cord. These tiny innocent babies stay in NICU under watchful eyes of caregivers. It is painful for the babies and for those who love and care for them. Adult addicts, on the other hand, are never encouraged or forced to go “cold Turkey”. They get to make choices to use or not use addictive drugs, or to withdraw or not withdraw from drugs. They are coddled, medicated and their addiction is fed either by illegal addictivve drugs or by legal “prescription” addictive drugs (ie Methedone). This seems lopsided and unfair to me. If a tiny newborn can withdraw…..then their mother’s can too!
Yes – they can – but, whether they choose to or not, is another matter entirely.
what will be the long range future for these babies .
they were born with these drugs in their systems .are they also going to be addicts in the years to come.
If these mothers don’t change their ways
.Sadly the end of mankind as we know it.