WASHINGTON — The Supreme Court’s ruling on President Barack Obama’s health care overhaul law follows a century of debate over what role the government should play in helping people in the United States afford medical care. A look at the issue through the years:
1912: Former President Theodore Roosevelt champions national health insurance as he unsuccessfully tries to ride his progressive Bull Moose Party back to the White House.
1929: Baylor Hospital in Texas originates group health insurance. Dallas teachers pay 50 cents a month to cover up to 21 days of hospital care per year.
1935: President Franklin D. Roosevelt favors creating national health insurance amid the Great Depression but decides to push for Social Security first.
1942: Roosevelt establishes wage and price controls during World War II. Businesses can’t attract workers with higher pay so they compete through added benefits, including health insurance, which grows into a workplace perk.
1945: President Harry Truman calls on Congress to create a national insurance program for those who pay voluntary fees. The American Medical Association denounces the idea as “socialized medicine” and it goes nowhere.
1960: John F. Kennedy makes health care a major campaign issue but as president can’t get a plan for the elderly through Congress.
1965: President Lyndon B. Johnson’s legendary arm-twisting and a Congress dominated by his fellow Democrats lead to creation of two landmark government health programs: Medicare for the elderly and Medicaid for the poor.
1974: President Richard Nixon wants to require employers to cover their workers and create federal subsidies to help everyone else buy private insurance. The Watergate scandal intervenes.
1976: President Jimmy Carter pushes a mandatory national health plan, but economic recession helps push it aside.
1986: President Ronald Reagan signs COBRA, a requirement that employers let former workers stay on the company health plan for 18 months after leaving a job, with workers bearing the cost.
1988: Congress expands Medicare by adding a prescription drug benefit and catastrophic care coverage. It doesn’t last long. Barraged by protests from older Americans upset about paying a tax to finance the additional coverage, Congress repeals the law the next year.
1993: President Bill Clinton puts first lady Hillary Rodham Clinton in charge of developing what becomes a 1,300-page plan for universal coverage. It requires businesses to cover their workers and mandates that everyone have health insurance. The plan meets Republican opposition, divides Democrats and comes under a firestorm of lobbying from businesses and the health care industry. It dies in the Senate.
1997: Clinton signs bipartisan legislation creating a state-federal program to provide coverage for millions of children in families of modest means whose incomes are too high to qualify for Medicaid.
2003: President George W. Bush persuades Congress to add prescription drug coverage to Medicare in a major expansion of the program for older people.
2008: Hillary Rodham Clinton promotes a sweeping health care plan in her bid for the Democratic presidential nomination. She loses to Obama, who has a less comprehensive plan.
2009: Obama and the Democratic-controlled Congress spend an intense year ironing out legislation to require most companies to cover their workers; mandate that everyone have coverage or pay a fine; require insurance companies to accept all comers, regardless of any pre-existing conditions; and assist people who can’t afford insurance.
2010: With no Republican support, Congress passes the measure, designed to extend health care coverage to more than 30 million uninsured people. Republican opponents scorned the law as “Obamacare.”
2012: On a campaign tour in the Midwest, Obama himself embraces the term “Obamacare” and says the law shows “I do care.”



Interesting! Never knew that Dems have been whining about ‘free’ healthcare since 1912!
No wonder their argument is so tired.
Of course old Teddy Roosevelt was a Republican who ran as a “Bull Moose” because the Republicans were too controlled by the Big Businesses of the day and too regressive in improving people’s lives at the time.
By the way, what’s ‘free’ about any of it? It looked like a question of “how-it-was-paid-for” that’s always been the issue. I’m currently paying for the poor and un-insured in my hospital and insurance rates – this would make some of them to pay for own instead of me.
And they gave us the Federal Reserve in 1913…awesome!
Now you can whine about health care for 100 years!
Add it to crying about paying your Taxes, no one will notice!
You really don’t need to have a national health insurance law as comprehensive and invasive as the ACA to cover a child to age 26 or deal with pre-existing conditions. There is nothing that precludes those things from separate legislation. In fact most insurers plan on maintaining those benefits even if the ACA is completely overturned.
Exactly! But obama needed a signature piece of legislation to affirm his legitimacy.
So much for THAT idea! Now everyone will know that for obama, the Constitution is just something to be circumvented.
The Dems could do SO much better than obama, but they have decided to continue supporting him. About as foolish as when some Republicans continued to support Nixon after his downfall.
Ronald Reagan created this whole mess with an Unfunded Mandate requiring hostpitals to treat patients without any means to pay.
If Obama care is found to be unconstitutional because it mandates people to purchase a product so should Reagans mandate as it mandates a service be provided for free!
But Reagan is the “ICON” of the Conservative Movement!
Huh!
Ultimately it’s an argument for a different standard of care. No insurance and/or no means of paying? Then no health care and no emergency care. That would certainly keep costs down!
That is not true. I don’t know about the law you are referring to but hospitals have always been treating people without any means to pay. If there are changes brought about by Reagan you need to clarify what they are and provide a source.
I don’t have to prove anything!
Do your own research!
Besides, The Health care Law was upheld!LOL
Tens of millions uninsured and likely unable to afford care, this is a huge problem for our country. Hopefully if this gets overturned, both sides will get to work on another solution and hopefully Republican politicians will come to the table in good faith.
And when they return to the table (they were there once, but dismissed by obozo), the Dems will not get all high and mighty this time and some responsible, mature solutions will be reached, instead of this unconstitutional, partisan POS law the Dems came up with all by themselves!
But I don’t really blame them for this POS, after all, they are Lemmings. By their own admission, the didn’t read the bill before they blindly voted for it! Yea, that’s Dem leadership for ya’!
Mature and responsible? Like calling the President “obozo”? Come on.
I agree his real name thief is better.
You forget this law (Obamacare) is almost identical to that pushed through by Mittens Romney for Mass?
Have you read both pieces of legislation? Or are you just regurgitating the latest campaign attack ad?
I can think of a big difference without even getting to the heart of the laws. One is Federal One is State.
Obamacare should have been named Republicare as it was designed by the Heritage Foundation Ten Years earlier!
The deception is amazing, design an alternative to the Single Payer system with no real intent to pass it, but to use it as a diversion. The fact that they questioned the constitutionality “after” it was passed proves their Real Intent!
Protect and support the Insurance Companies at all costs, even if it means millions of people have no coverage!
Absolutely Dispicable!
I have a great deal of empathy for those that can’t afford health insurance and most likely their health care either. I have read the all 1000+ pages of this legislation and found that there are a few good things in it. I have also read the GAO reports on it’s cost escalations and the CBO on what it will do to the insurance companies that provide so many their current health insurance. I hope that after today’s verdict comes down that we can get the people that we sent to Washington to sit down and have a civil discourse about what is truly going to be the best way to move forward! Compromise is not a dirty word…but apparently both sides have forgotten this concept.
I was listening until you called it ‘obozocare’. There’s no need for name calling. It shows me that your ‘logic’ is weak.
You are right, no need for name calling. Besides, I want this abortion to go down in history by it’s true monicker – obamacare! (Even obama calls it that now.)
Close your mind and orate
Entitlement programs are destined to fail in any country with a population that increases by millions every year and that allows the poor/needy of other nations to come enjoy the fruits of our labor. If we had no entitlement programs, we could have open borders. Only countries with stagnant population growth (and economic growth) can make socialized entitlements survive.
Yes , your right, Nobody tryed to cross the border into Germany in the late 1930’s!
I really don’t understand why this is all so complicated. Healthcare is a requirement in our country. Car insurance is required to drive your car on the road, health insurance should be required for all people to have as well. The gripe that I have is the premiums for health insurance should be based on a percentage of each individuals or families income. If you make $10,000,000 your insurance should be 8% of your income on another note if your family has an income of $15,000 your insurance should be 8% of your income. Wouldn’t this be fair? Not sure why so many super expensive studies, law suits, etc.. have to occur for such a simple financial plan. I must commend Lepage for hiring fraud investigators for the State of Maine Medicare and Mainecare programs. This is a step forward in the fight against system abuse. Thanks for that.
It is not complicated at all Adam. Get ready for massive change on a scale your little brain in its box couldn’t even fathom as you think only one step ahead to that dollar.
Little brain? Do you know me? Simply was writing a posible solution rather than complaining all of the time. Why don’t you use your real name instead of hiding behind the computer screen? Just wondering?
Sorry Adam, I was probably having a bad day and shouldn’t have taken it out on you. Forcing people to pay for a product against their will is unAmerican.
Look who the bozo is now. Obama, now goes down as one of the greatest presidents of all time thanks to Judge Roberts. Have a nice angry day. :)
The court said Obamacare was mostly constitutional. It did not say it was a good law. Obama will go down in history with the biggest tax increase on the people in history
Sorry, that goes to your hero G.W. Bush.
Why isn’t he campaigning for any republicans this year.
Bush makes Dan Quayle look intelligent.
You know what, there is a certain respect to a seated president that we all learn in grammar school. I’m sorry you flunked that one. As much as i disliked President Bush i respected the position he was in and the man in it. I feel you need to go back and get a refresher course in manners sir.
Mediocracy wins today. Time to stay home and be a pick pocket rather than a producer.This is a sad day for America. This will secure mitts presidency.
Seems to me that about 15% – 20% of people in any given state are uninsured and that is a heck of a lot of people. The question is, when these people are insured, will our premiums go down as we no longer have part of our premiums cover the uninsured, or will the insurance companies jiggle actuarial figures to claim more and higher rate increases are necessary? Also, WHAT panels will be created, and by whom plus comprised of whom to make the decisions about how much care is delivered and to whom? Seems like too much of a chance for a “Logan’s Run” or “Soylent Green” world with the gub’mint running things… Oh, and WHY does Congress get to exempt itself from the same healthcare we peons receive?
This is NOT health care for all. To many people have not simply read this bill. You have to buy it. The problem is as the law is written those employers with less the 50 employes have two choices pay more into insuring the employes OR simply pay the lower penalty the latter leaves the employes with NO insurance unless they buy it themselves unless they can not afford it then they to will pay the fine! The fact that this bill requires insurers to cover kids till they are 26 from there parents insurance and the inability to refuse a preexisting condition means insurance will go up and up and up because the fine is cheaper then insurance is now nobody will get insurance till they NEED it thus there will be no pool to pull from for insurance companies to pay out monies. So what does this bill really do? Raise rates! Cause many doctors to drop certain insurance companies. Cause the closing of almost if not every insurance company. Cause almost every employer with less then 50 employes to drop coverage and make many companies with over 50 to drop to the below 50 requirement.
All those of you who think this is a great idea wait 10 years. Let me know what your paying in taxes then. Also be sure to let me know all you have to do just to see a doctor.