SEARSPORT, Maine — It’s an irony not lost on many people.

Those who struggle to pay their oil and electric bills and would benefit most from installing the latest energy-saving equipment often cannot afford the investment. Yet the extravagant house overlooking the harbor might have solar panels on its roof.

Tom Gocze, whose American Solartechnics company has been designing and manufacturing alternative energy hardware for 30 years, recently returned to producing solar collectors that produce domestic hot water, the water that comes out of the kitchen tap and the shower head.

Unlike the high-tech hardware that might run $10,000 or more, American Solartechnics is producing solar systems capable of providing a family of four with most of its domestic hot water, heated by the sun, at about $3,000 installed or about $2,000 if the homeowner can do most of the work.

The solar systems are not new technology, said Gocze, and are in fact the result of years of testing, refining and studying real-world applications. The systems include roof panels that gather heat from the sun and transfer it to water or anti-freeze, then transfer the heat again to a tank full of water which can provide enough hot water for a shower.

Often, a backup source is needed as well, such as an electric hot water heater.

For Gocze, the science involved in using the sun to generate heat is remarkably simple.

“Putting something black in the sun to get hot isn’t high-tech. It’s stupidly simple,” he said.

Yet consumers will benefit from the years of work he’s done on that simple principle, he explained.

Back in the 1980s, when solar hot water collectors — not to be confused with solar photovoltaics, which produce electric current — were beginning to be more common, Gozce tested three leading approaches.

After rejecting the single-pane glass panels because they lost too much heat, he conducted a side-by-side comparison of double-glazed and triple-glazed panels and solar collectors that use vacuum tubes, all set up on his porch roof in Bangor, where he lived at the time.

“And much to my chagrin, the triple-glazed kind of sucked,” he joked, saying it did not perform much better than the double-glazed version and presented other problems.

The vacuum tubes worked well, but are more expensive, subject to damage and are “not necessarily the best fit for solar domestic hot water,” Gocze said. The vacuum tubes performed on a par with the double-glazed panels, “which was kind of surprising,” he said.

Flash-forward to 2012 and the concept remains, but American Solartechnics has learned a few things.

Instead of glass, the panels now use twin-wall polycarbonate sheets — essentially, a slightly corrugated plastic with a webbing separating the two sheets. The plastic greatly reduces the weight of the panels — down to about 35 pounds, instead of 100 pounds. And it holds up better than glass to dings from a branch or even a dropped tool.

“If you poke a hole in it, you can caulk it,” he said.

The frame that holds the panel together is sheet metal aluminum, lighter and cheaper than the heavier, extruded aluminum that larger manufacturers use. The panels are backed with an inch-and-a-half sheet of foil-faced rigid foam insulation.

Gocze’s son Peter and daughter Maria worked Friday morning preparing the components of the panels, the heart of which is woven, overlapped, wafflelike aluminum rectangles. Affixed to these panels are copper tubes, which take up the heat gathered by the aluminum.

The American Solartechnics solar hot water system differs from that of other commercial manufacturers in that it doesn’t weld the tubes to the collectors, saving labor. And rather than following the traditional rectangular shape, the company’s panels are 4-foot-by-4-foot, making them easier to ship and handle.

Gocze’s systems also rely on the 120-gallon tanks he has designed and refined. They, too, can be shipped easily and put together on site. Inside them is a coil of copper pipe through which the heated anti-freeze from the roof passes, heating the adjacent water.

“What we’re trying to do is a balancing act between performance and cost,” Gocze said, keeping the systems simple enough for do-it-yourself installers yet faithful enough to the technology’s potential.

The firm’s goal is for purchasers to see a five-year payback on 60 square feet of panels.

For more information, see americansolartechnics.com, or call Gocze at 888-866-8970.

Join the Conversation

16 Comments

  1. This is the type manufacturing and advanced ‘tech’ project that Maine needs. I for one am going to find out what it’s gonna cost me to re-fit my place PDQ now that summer is here, before I gotto go and re-fill my oil tank for last winter.

  2. I’m using some of Toms Collectors that are now 20 years old , I also have one of his original soft tanks. They have been producing hot water for 20 years with no issues. The collectors came down off the roof to reshingle the house, other than that they have been making hot water for 20 years.

  3. I have much doubt when it comes to alternative energy sources. My first thoughts are ‘scam’ and ‘snake oil’.  With that said, I trust Tom 100%. I occasionally listen to his radio show and a few times caught his TV show. I once called his insulation business and spoke with him. After I explained what I wanted to do with his product He informed me that to buy his product would be a waste of my money, and that I would be much better off with another product that he did not sell.
    I truly believe Tom is driven purely  by a passion for affordable, realistic, alternative energy.
    He never seams to skew the facts. He gives it like it is, the good, the bad,and the ugly.

    I applaud you sir, not only for your dedication, but more so for your honesty and integrity.
    I also operate on “people/passion before profit” and it sucks to see my competition driving around in brand new $40,000 trucks, but I sleep good knowing I did right today, and I’m sure you do the same.

  4. Hey you should partner up with Obama…. We will mount those collecters in the Basement where they will be safe from the elements…
    Angus thinks it you put a wind mill on them he can get ya some of that there grovernment grant money. 

  5. Doesn’t work for me, but maybe for others, do your math, before you buy as with anything.  My math: electric hot water for 3 people about $20 per month, I have very little direct sunshine 8 months per year and I have a crawl space so I’m limited on the 120 gallon storage tanks.  I would love nothing more to be independent from utilities, but just isn’t viable for me. 
    Just for the payback to work @ $3000/60 months is $50 per month for your current hot water bill. 

  6. You have to wonder who state and federal government are working for when a decent, thoroughly honest and hard-working small Maine businessman like Tom has to go it alone while all the public subsidies, tax breaks and “EZ-Pass” permitting are reserved for big out-of-state corporate entities like RailWorld of Chicago, DCP Midstream of Denver, Plum Creek of Seattle, Irving Energy of Saint John, N.B., Canada, and Sprague Energy of Stockholm, Sweden.

      1. Like a real entrepreneur, working as a real capitalist (not a crony capitalist), Tom has proved, like many others have also, that the state DOES NOT need to fund R&D.  What is it about the article this concept that you don’t understand?

  7. I have listened to his show for years and he means well…Though lately he seems a little flakey with more interest in banjos and other off beat music than home repair…3 grand doesn’t seem to affordable to me ,especially if you still have to have back up so you need to add that into the equation , but if you got it , more power to ya…Then again if I had that kinda money I doubt I would be worrying about saving a few bucks a month…LOL…

    1. The point is not to save a few bucks a month but to save the planet. I know, I know…sounds to touchy feely and tree hugging. But the truth is that we cannot continue to rape mother earth for fossil fuel and keep up the continuing wars and rumors of wars to control the supply of a finite resource.

      Unfortunately when our government looks at renewable energy they see it only in the context of corporate profits. Renewable energy will only ever be successful when each and every building has its own solar and wind generators as is illustrated very well in some other countries. Even those who have less optimal weather than we do over all.

      I live in S.TX and other than the prohibitive costs of the current home generators and the massive amount of red tape and permits involved there is no good reason why every home here could not be powered almost exclusively by wind, solar and geo-thermal. Yet, there is almost no movement to ensure that happening. Why? Because it is not profitable for the energy companies and their lobbyists are more than happy to explain that to our elected officials.

      Tom is certainly on the right track. We have to work with renewables within the point of use
      context. And we need to help him promote not only his products, but the idea as well because it will be nearly impossible for inventors like him to ever get the backing of our government. He, like us, does not have enough money to be important in the grand corporate/political scheme of things. 

      1.  https://docs.google.com/file/d/0B_fNpWPrOUoxempyZnRCenBSYzJobl8wSXBwbjRJZw/edit?pli=1
        Sometimes doing the right thing has a bonus of saving money. You make good points. Some people have to tangibly experience solar power to get it. My first exposure to real solar effect is when I was repairing and old flat plate collector as a student a SMVTI. aka SMCC. Touching the absorber fin of the unit singed my fingers pretty good. At SMVTI. the students also built a solar house, +80 degrees in the dead of winter no other heat supply.

  8.  The total solar energy absorbed by Earth’s atmosphere, oceans and land masses is approximately 3,850,000 exajoules (EJ) per year.[7] In 2002, this was more energy in one
    hour than the world used in one year.[12][13] Photosynthesis captures approximately 3,000 EJ per year in biomass.[9]
    The amount of solar energy reaching the surface of the planet is so
    vast that in one year it is about twice as much as will ever be obtained
    from all of the Earth’s non-renewable resources of coal, oil, natural
    gas, and mined uranium combined.[14]

    Solar energy can be harnessed in different levels around the world.
    Depending on a geographical location the closer to the equator the more
    “potential” solar energy is available.[15]

    In my experience the biggest challenge to solar energy is that it is difficult to centralize. Systems designed to meet municipal or city size needs are very complicated because of scale. The problem with using the suns energy is not accessible incoming capacity it is the storage of the energy in general. For example, I installed a 8’x12′ greenhouse on the side of my house, on the southwest side. I receive excess energy, the temperature reaches 120 degrees inside the greenhouse for about three hours in winter. I open the sliding door and heat that portion of the house. Even on half sun I still am at a surplus. You do not have to disconnect from the grid to take advantage of the sun.
    I believe Tom has developed an eloquent, simple and efficient methodology in his design. Each source has unique challenges whether is a hot water system, Photovoltaic or wind. Efficient solar systems will be developed by people like Tom, who has spent a long time experimenting.
    http://bangor-launch.newspackstaging.com/2008/10/08/news/living-offgrid/
    http://builditsolar.com/
    http://www.dadsolar.com/
    Solar is the way to being  independent. 

Leave a comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *