ROCKPORT, Maine — When Bill Chapman and his wife retired to Maine after working 40 years in Chicago, they made sure to pack his golf clubs.

Nearly 10 years later, those clubs are still gathering dust in their Rockport home. The Chapmans may have retired, but the baby-boomer couple was not yet ready to rust, as the saying goes.

“I do a lot of volunteering. A lot of service,” Bill Chapman, 63, who is the chair of his town’s select board, said this week. “I have some hobbies — but not a lot of time for my hobbies.”

The couple was an early example of what many in midcoast Maine hope will become a trend: retiring baby boomers deciding to resettle in Knox, Lincoln and Waldo counties. Some in the region seem to be banking on an influx of retiring boomers as a path to prosperity.

Next month, the Penobscot Bay Regional Chamber of Commerce will debut a magazine called “Coastal Maine Life,” which is focused on relocation and resettlement, particularly for the baby boomer cohort. Dan Bookham, the Chamber’s executive director, said there has been a lot of interest from local advertisers and businesses who understand that midcoast Maine is well-placed to benefit from retiring baby boomers. The generation comprises the 79 million babies born in the post-war years of 1946 to 1964, who are now 48 to 66 years old.

“It’s an interesting time,” Bookham said. “As we emerge from the Great Recession, we have the largest and most affluent group of retirees coming on the scene that we’ve ever seen. And this part of the world is ideal for retirees.”

Baby boomers are particularly attractive as a demographic in part because many might want to retire from high-pressure jobs and fast-paced cities, but not to stop being engaged in their communities or even in new business ventures.

“People aren’t retiring to stop. They’re retiring to start,” Bookham said. “Our part of Maine, and the state in general, offers great opportunity for people looking for the next chapter in their life.”

He ticked off some of the attractions of the midcoast area, including vibrant Main Street communities; the opportunity to kayak on the bay or bird-watch; safer, smaller, slower-paced towns and cities; and a diversity of cultural offerings.

Even though Maine already is the oldest state in the nation, according to the last U.S. Census, having an influx of younger retirees would be positive, Bookham said.

“I think there’s a lot for Maine to gain in encouraging people to return home to retire, or to choose Maine for their next chapter,” he said.

They love it’

Attracting retirees to Maine is not a new idea, according to Laurie LaChance, outgoing president of the Maine Development Foundation. When she was the Maine State Economist under Gov. Angus King, she took the lead on an effort to attract more retirees to Maine. The effort generated a lot of good research, she said, led to two published reports and a “massive” conference on the topic held in the fall of 2001.

LaChance described the retirement sector as a green industry with a net economic benefit.

“The people who tend to move in for retirement are people of means,” she said. “Despite the stock market changes, this generation of boomers is the wealthiest of all time. … They’re not coming for our welfare system, believe me. That’s just a fallacy. They were people buying million-dollar homes in Camden, and they love it there.”

But the national economy softened after Sept. 11, 2001, and the recommendations the task force had put forward weren’t acted on.

“It was an opportunity lost,” LaChance said. “It’s still there. There’s still definitely opportunities to nibble around this, despite the fact that Maine has never done anything actively to pursue that.”

Two years ago, 6,035 people in the baby boomer demographic moved to Maine from a different state, according to the U.S. Census.

They likely earned more in those other states — Maine’s average income ranges from 10 to 14 percent below the average U.S. income, she said.
And though locals may grumble about rising property taxes for schools and other municipal expenditures, LaChance thinks that out-of-state retirees won’t be among the naysayers.

“If you move here from Connecticut, then the retirement income you have is most likely fine,” she said. “People of means who are well-educated want to move to a state with a strong educational system, because if you don’t have a strong educational system, you have a higher crime rate. They want safe communities, clean communities and access to the natural beauty of Maine. Why move to a community that looks just like Massachusetts and just like New Jersey?”

LaChance said that attracting more retirees to the state won’t fix all our problems.

“It’s not the end-all, but I think it could be a very nice piece to add to a complement of economic programming,” she said. “It’s a very viable piece of strategy for Maine.”

Not everyone agrees

Some feel the state is in danger of putting too many of its eggs in the boomer basket, though, and losing sight of the bigger economic and demographic picture. What kind of state should Maine become? Who should be most encouraged to move here? These are questions that are important to debate, according to Rob Brown of Opportunity Maine, a nonprofit organization that works to promote economic security and sustainable development in Maine.

“I think Maine falls too often into the next shiny thing that comes along,” he said this week. “I think we can all say right up front that nobody has anything against retirees. That’s a given. But if it’s a matter of proactive economic and social policy in this state to try and attract certain groups of people to come here, we might consider what some side effects are of that policy.”

He said that working to woo retiring baby boomers might put efforts to lure other demographics, such as young people and families, on the back burner.

“Retirees bring wealth,” he said. “But a bigger question for the society at large in Maine is what kind of social and economic vitality do they bring to the state? What kind of diversity do they bring to the state?”

Although many have the impression that young people are leaving their rural communities, and then the state, in droves, that’s not exactly the case, he said. Lots of younger folks move from smaller towns to cities like Bangor, Portland and Rockland, where they take advantage of the creative economy that is putting these communities on “Best of” lists around the country.

But if Maine’s reputation as a haven for retirees grows, will this change?

“They’re going to view Maine as nothing more than a retirement community. They are going to look at Maine like Florida,” Brown said. “That does not bode well for our communities or for our school system. How many young people are going to want to move here after college?”

Brown believes the state’s economy is already overloaded with service-sector or care-taking jobs.

“Way too many of those jobs are low-income, low-skill, fairly insecure jobs that do not add much in the way of sustained growth,” he said, adding that he thinks education is the key to changing the state’s economy. Not necessarily luring retirees.

“If we have a world-class higher education system that’s affordable — that becomes a huge attractor, nationally and internationally,” Brown said.

But that’s down the road. Right now, people such as John Richardson are working to benefit from the expected silver wave of retiring baby boomers.

Baby boom, building boom

Richardson, a midcoast developer and former commissioner of the Maine Department of Economic and Community Development said condominium units at the planned Village at Rockport development are selling well and the baby boomers are the prime market.

Units in the midcoast development start at $159,000.

“Baby boomers are coming from outside and interested in a home with a smaller footprint,” he said. “Our marketing studies determined that the baby boomers are looking to downsize. We gave them a great price and a great location and a sufficient amount of amenities to satisfy the baby boomer generation,” he said. “When I was commissioner, it was something we looked at: How to keep and attract the baby boomers to Maine. This is something that I felt was important.”

A few miles north on Route 1, Realtor Bennett Bricker of Camden Real Estate said he isn’t sure he agrees that baby boomers are his prime market.

“I don’t think the baby boomers do drive the local economy,” he said, estimating that Camden is composed of about half retirees and half nonretirees. “The local economy is really driven by the tourist industry.”

However, Richardson said his hunch about the boomers has proven to be a good investment.

“The good news is that we’re very successful,” he said. “The bad news is that we’re running out of units to sell, because the demand is so high.”

Chapman said the town of Rockport has been happy to gear up for more retirees moving into the area.

“I’d welcome them,” he said of the retirees. “They bring quite a bit of diversity. And as my experience shows, they typically have some free time, and devote efforts to make the town better.”

Join the Conversation

83 Comments

  1. This Boomer is moving out of Maine once I can sell my house in this Maine Real Estate Depression.  The heating oil, income taxes on retirement pension, land taxes, expensive gasoline, expensive food, very very expensive electricity, expensive car registration and long distance of travel just to shop or go somewhere. You have to be very very rich to live in Maine now a days. I am heading SOUTH.

    1.  I am approaching the age of retirement and am looking at communities of American ex-pats in SE Asia and Central America. We will see.

      1. Check out Costa Rica: a politically stable and beautiful country.  Great health care industry to take care of your needs as you age.

        1. Familes should take care of the retired. Why do the taxpayers have to pay for everything?

          1. Well now there’s an interesting point of view.   In my view we should all be planning for our own retirement such that we are self-sustaining and not creating a burden on our children or our extended families.

          2. I agree, but we have to take care of the generation (not all) who did not plan or have the opportunity to plan. Unfortunately the consequence is that those supporting the system now may not have a system to recover the money they paid into social security to ensure they had money to support themselves. There were too many babyboomers for the system to handle.

    2. Smart Move . Look at Pennsylvania!
       Mild wnters(compared to Maine), and no taxation of IRA, Pensions, SSI. 3.07 flat tax.
      Boomers need lobotomies to stay in Mass. North!

  2. These are the people that the town of Searsport discourages from coming to our town.  

    1. I have lived in Rockland for 67 years and this is the type of people they want while they drive those of us who have lived here most of our lives out with higher and higher taxes and more regulations. It gets worse and worse.

  3. So we are boasting about attracting older folk who are on fixed incomes and don’t contribute to the workforce?

    Great.

    How about keeping the young workforce who are leaving by the bus-load?

    1. The young college educated have already left Maine. All 5 of my college educated children left Maine a few years ago since there were no jobs available here that paid a decent wage, feed a family and have benefits.

      1. Exactly. The good paying professional jobs are few and far between. Also the decent paying entry level jobs are not there as well. Take a look at some of the job website and you’ll be shocked to see how little is out there for a well educated young person.

    2.  There not taking jobs away from the young, and they pay taxes for the schools. It looks like a win win situation, They are going to be on medicare so the state isn’t paying there way. They spend their retirements from money made out of the state here in Maine. It good for Maine.

      1. They do bring their money, but they also vote.  The get involved in local politics.  They influence how communities run…flatlander ways.  I’m good with it…are you?

      2. Actually in our town I see over and over these retirees taking jobs that may have gone to a local young person because once they get here they realize there isn’t anything for them to do so they go find a job and work.

      3. I’m not suggesting hey are taking away jobs. They are transforming the comunities from working communities to communities that are quiet retirement communities were all is peaceful and beautiful. I see it all around us. People I know complain about the increase in traffic, the noise, all the stuff that makes a working community (NOT BASED IN TOURISM AND SERVICE INDUSTRY!)

  4. As a young person who grew up here and is trying to figure out a way to make a living and stay here, this strikes me as the problem. There is more focus on attracting people who made their money out of state who want to retire here then keeping people who have lived here most of their lives here.

    What a great message to send people growing up here “move away and make a lot of money, then maybe one day you can move back here to retire!” In the meantime, if you want to stay, get a job working for some retired person

    1. Couldn’t agree more.  As a person of relative youth who has moved and come back, many times. I find it hard to stay in Maine but it is almost harder to leave Maine.  It is near impossible to make a decent start in this state unless you got capital to back you up.   Jobs are almost non-existent for any decent wage.  And living expenses are relatively high compared to most places out west or down south.   Maine still has a lot of work to do.   The state has become the loony bin and retirement home of the north east.  I find it depressing but can’t bring myself to leave again because I know there is potential here.   Somethings gotta give.

      1. The Maine way, move the youth away. Well we can all go to Florida once the retired move away from there!

    2. Yes, you are right – jobs as landscapers and housekeepers will abound.  Not exactly the American dream for us locals.  And so many seniors are intolerant of families with small children.  Children in many restaurants are viewed as a nusance in Camden.  I went to a church concert with my small child and left because of the unpleasant sneers from several seniors in the audience.

      And when those seniors bring their hard earned skills to the community to volunteer let’s remember they are old school skills and expereince that sadly are often no longer a fit in the modern economy. (i’m not happy about it but it should be stated.)   Camden’s economic development committee is a great example.

      Maybe there will be a few more healthcare jobs, for folks to care for those boomers who have not taken care of their health that are bleeding the country dry -thru medicare bills. Moreover those healthcare salaries are up in that 5% of the national average.  They are not going to start businesses or create jobs.  Just more of a drain.

      So what happens when the boomers die in the next twenty years?  Their houses will go unsold and everyone else’s will be devalued.  If you are in your forties now is the time to sell Maine short.  Seems this plan to attract the geratric set is myopic.  But then vision is in short supply.  No wonder there’s such high turnover in these leadership jobs.  The pressure for short term solutions is so tragic for the long term health of our coummunity, state and country.

  5. No one who was born here and loves four seasons wants to leave.  I have co-workers in Dallas who are still perplexed about the four season theory.  Maine is Maine.  Once you love it, meet it, visit it, it’s a dream that only a few financially fortunate few can come back to after putting in their working years.  

  6. Let the retirees come—after all, they bring no children to educate, yet they help pay for education of young Mainers through their property taxes. Maine needs to start thinking about being business and industry friendly. Whenever there is something new ready to move up, the nay-sayers and the regulations come out of the woodwork. Old time Mainers do not want any change and unless there is change, then the youngsters will be driven to other regions of the country to find jobs. Stop complaining and start welcoming all who would like to be living in Maine.

    1. You said it.  The mills (which were horrible to the environment, by the way) are not going to reopen.  The Maine of Old is gone…and it is not coming back.

      Don’t want “life in Maine” to change?  It’s changing around you, and young people are voting with their feet because you don’t want your life to change.  Instead of being the victim of Change, how about effecting useful Change yourself.

  7. This article makes me sad. What about young people with families? I for one would love to be able to find a many more professional jobs listed. Once you get out of the Portland area, the pickings are very slim for any sort of college-educated level job. I’m lucky I am employed and can work from home for a large company. But if I were to look for comparable work, I’d be looking outside of Maine. The job base is just not here. And no thanks, I didn’t get a four year degree to wait tables or be a CNA.

    If you follow the news, you also notice many times the people objecting to new developments or projects are retirees who have moved here after making their money elsewhere. Not all, mind you, but a fair number don’t want their “pristine state” to be upset by things like jobs and progress.

    1. Most of the houses for sale in Maine are Dumps or second  and third hand trailers. Out of staters would never look at one of these trash heaps for sale let alone buy one. Probably less then 3% of homes for sale out of staters would look at to purchase, maybe even less then that.

  8. I am one of the baby boomers who thought they were retiring in Maine.  But, I needed health insurance, so I went back to work, full-time.  Unfortunately, I agree with many of the other posters.  I find it difficult to survive here with all the taxes and fees.  My retirement is taxed by the state of Maine as income.  My property taxes help pay for the 200+ students who attend our local schools.  Over 50% of my taxes go to the school.  I agree that the only way to have a good community is to share the cost of what it takes to make a viable city.  I guess I really don’t mind the re-distribution of wealth, but I can’t really afford the redistribution that Maine performs.

    I can certainly say that I could not afford southern or mid-coast Maine.  I am in Washington county and I overlook Canada.  I love it here, but am afraid I will have to move.  I am a full-time resident, and I am looking at becoming a non-resident, my reason, to avoid the oppressive taxes you long time residents pay.

    I am not a burden on the state of Maine.  I have no children in school, and I use very little of the services the city offers.    The state of Maine is a burden on me.  My effective tax rate is almost 20%.  I am not wealthy at all.  When you take the expenses of Maine;  electricity, heating, utilities, and the necessary things out of my budget, not a lot is left.  By simply spending 182 days in Maine per year, I can avoid almost half my tax burden.  Many of the people I know do the same thing, they are snowbirds.   Taxes are so bad that many businesses that are seasonal have owners who close their business for the season on the 180th day, then vacate the state for 6 months.   By staying only 180 days, the people are Maine residents, hence they pay no state income tax.  I am sure they have to pay business taxes, but personal income is exempt!

    Governor LePage has a couple of ideas that would definitely benefit the state, but only if he can get them passed by the legislature.

    1. I’m curious if you attended public schools. Perhaps you didn’t–you may have attended private schools all the way, paid for by wealthy parents.

      But if you did attend public schools, the people who were adults back then (including retired people) paid taxes that paid for YOUR education. Now your taxes are paying for the next generation’s education. That is simply how it works.

    2. Be careful with that 180 day rule.  You also have to take steps to change your domicile. One could be away for the whole year and still be considered a resident subject to income tax on their entire income.  Change your driver’s licences, voter registrations etc. It is a good idea to have all financial documents sent to an out of state address although having a Maine addres  in itself is not enough to make you a resident.  It will probably prompt an inquiry though.

    1. With Maine having the highest percentage of homes owned by non-residents in the nation you are setting your hopes too high.  They will pay property tax but will not pay income tax. I am a tax accountant and have seen retirees who have come to Maine as clients.  Of those that become residents of Maine most become non-residents of Maine within several years. They figure that they are spending 4 t0 5 months out of the state already why spend $10,000 to $20,00o or more of state  income tax to spend another month and many of them would be subject to the estate tax also. You mentioned the political persuation of the retirees,  in my experience those of the liberal persuation are the first to declare non-residency.   Also think of your politicians.  You really think George Mitchell, William Cohen etc are still residents of Maine for tax purposes?  Think Snowe & Mckernan will remain?  Think Pingree & Sussman will stay as residents (if he has made himself a resident now)?  Those getting out of school are voting with their feet & the retirees are voting with their feet becuase they can.  Maine has an unsustainable budget based on the tax base they have.

      1.  The festival was over and the boys were all planning for a fall
        The cabaret was quiet except for the drilling in the wall
        The curfew had been lifted and the gambling wheel shut down
        Anyone with any sense had already left town

                                                                   ~~~~~ Bob Dylan

  9. I see, it’s okay to like the wealthy as long as they agree with you philosophically. How convenient  that must be for you. Those your touting claim non9-resident status and don’t pay income tax to the state of MAINE. But hey, they’ll keep Starbucks busy.

  10. I think the general consensus on the forum is Maines children move or find drugs and rich  ex-yuppies move in.  I don’t see how this is a good thing.

  11. Why would ANYONE, young or old, want to move to a state whose governor constantly bad-mouths it?

    1. Guess we couldn’t find enough places for all the people who were moving in before the last election, right?  I for one will not be a resident when I retire in two years with an 8% marginal tax rate.  I will maintain my summer home.  Getting that marginal rate down to 4% or equivilent and keep the estate tax exemption at $2 million or higher would have me and probably others reconsidering.

      1. You have a net worth of more than two million dollars, yet balk at paying taxes that fund Maine’s infrastructure… as though you never drive on the roads or bridges, hope for the fire department or police to respond if you call, and could never possibly fall ill and need to use one of our hospitals.

        It always amazes me how conservatives seem to assume that these services simply exist, and don’t need to be paid for. They can always come up with some excuse for not contributing. Poor, poor little millionaires.

        1.  And you just provided another one.    Who would want to live in a place that vilifies people for doing well and for providing income to others?

          1. Exactly.  “You’re doing well, so pay up!”  And worse, people who pay more and use less are the Bad Guys, while people who pay little/none and use way more are the Good Guys.

          2. The notion that millionaires are “job creators” thanks to special tax breaks is a fairy tale. If it were true, there would be no unemployment, following years after year of that failed experiment.

          3. I see, So let’s attack people so they leave. That’ll teach ’em.

            Why are you so intent on economic suicide?

        2. As you don’t know me you have alot of assumptions.   I pay fuel tax for the use of the roads. I pay & will pay property tax that far exceeds anything I have taken from the town.  I live on private road which we pay for which exits onto a state highway in a neighboring town. I have to drive 5 miles to get to a town road in the town I live it.  We have our own well & septic and have no trash pickup.   I was a volunteer fireman and make a substantion donation to them each year and will continue to do so.  You have the right to elect those that will do your bidding.  I have the right to vote with my feet.  Maybe you ought to be more concerned with whether you have have paid for the services you use. 

          1. You chose to live on a private road, so kindly don’t complain that you have to pay for it or that you have to drive to get to a public road.

            We all pay property tax in one form or another (a portion of renters’ rent goes toward the property tax the building’s owner pays). The fuel tax you and I and all other drivers pay may go toward “use” of the roads, but if you look around you may notice roads and bridges that are falling into disrepair across the state–some areas are forced to abandon pavement & have the roads revert to dirt.

            If your vision of Maine is that everyone who lives here should have to drill their own well and dig their own septic system (public systems falling apart and being abandoned for lack of funds to repair or replace them)–even in towns– I can see why you’d balk at paying taxes that go toward the public good.

          2.  After you get done misunderstanding what Billy just told you answer this question.  Do you contribute more to the state, local and federal coffers than you use? I would guess not.

          3. You appear to believe that anyone who complains about special tax breaks for millionaires must be among the unemployed or disabled people who are suffering directly from that failed experiment. You must have overlooked the numerous comments I’ve made in which I describe my very well-paid more than full-time employment.

          4. Do you really believe that you know what I am thinking?
            As for failed experiments… try a socialist Europe.

          5. Gosh I accused no one of being a communist. But, If you punish people who are successful at some point they leave. 

            Example: It has been less than a week since Hollande of France (a socialist) became PM. He advocated a 75% tax rate just the week before. Already UK financial firms are swamped by inquiries from the wealth French concerning moving their assets.

            It is even easy for the American middle class to do it these days. I have an account in a foreign bank. (Not a lot mind you) But people can move money with ease is my point.

            I forgot I have a paypal account in euro’s.

          6.  My info on the financial move of French assets came from The Financial Times.
            I think the problem British Rock stars had was with US laws. They would have to pay top rate here and then in the UK the top rate again on the same money. The result would be 110% or 120% of their income… Pretty harsh that.

          7. Europe’s current problems are being greatly worsened by austerity measures–the same vicious slashes of social services and other public spending that Republican politicians hope to use to reduce the US to 3rd world status.

          8.  That is not true. Europe’s problem stem from over spending. The fact is no one (Germany in particular) are willing to pay the bills others incurred. Why should they?

          9. I disagree. As Paul Krugman notes, “Watching Europe sink into recession – and Greece plunge into the abyss – I found myself wondering what it would take to convince the chattering classes that austerity in the face of an already depressed economy is a terrible idea. After all, all it took was the predictable and predicted failure of an inadequate stimulus plan to convince our political elite that stimulus never works, and that we should pivot immediately to austerity, never mind three generations’ worth of economic research telling us that this was exactly the wrong thing to do… we’ve just had a powerful test of the Keynesian proposition that when monetary policy isn’t available, changes in government spending move the economy in the same direction – and the results of that test say that what has lately passed for policy wisdom is instead almost criminal folly.”
            Also: [In the US, with austerity policies ] “we’re sacrificing the future as well as the present. Oh, and the cuts that aren’t falling on investment in physical capital are largely falling on human capital, that is, education… It’s hard to overstate just how wrong all this is. We have a situation in which resources are sitting idle looking for uses — massive unemployment of workers, especially construction workers, capital so bereft of good investment opportunities that it’s available to the federal government at negative real interest rates. Never mind multipliers and all that (although they exist too); this is a time when government investment should be pushed very hard. Instead, it’s being slashed. What an utter disaster.”

          10. Krugman is a high paid fool. The problem stems from an inability to access credit at reasonable rates. No one is going to loan money to Greece until they get their financial house in order. The problem is no one wants to finance their debt.

  12. The out of state retirees I know do live on the coast Maine, but also live 6 months in Florida, their Residency state, and pay no Maine taxes. 

  13. As a social and economic concept, retirement is new. Before the advent of social security, few people actually retired from their particular grindstones, The promise of millions of boomer retirees having nothing to do but spend their fortunes is enticing , but the way we’re going, they might not be as flush as some like to think. Retirement as a stage of life might not be that sustainable, hence back to the good old days when most people simply dropped to the ground in full harness.

    1.  Social security was not intended as a retirement vehicle. Don’t count it in your planning numbers.
      Retirements became available because big business provided it for their employees and individuals planned and paid for it by saving. 

      1. You’re right about SS as intended – my error. SS is a social insurance program. Since it was instituted ,it was a safety valve for most. But since the late 1970’s or thereabouts, the stagnation of real wages and the shrinkage of pension plans other than iras and the like (which are relatively recent, and aren’t earning much these days),  for many of those in the world of low earnings it has come to be relied on more than originally thought. 
        As for big business, solid pension programs were produced through collective bargaining between corporations and organized labor, which along with the pensions has practically disappeared. Historically, private savings investments for retirement nest-eggs were pretty much a middle class thing, growing in significance for about a century as did the broad middle class itself. Would you agree that neither the broad middle class (that is, those who attempt to live and own as though they were middle class) nor its discretionary income is in a particularly healthy state these days?

        1.  Lots of folks use the Reagan years of the 80’s when they speak of wage disparity starting to grow. The actual wage disparity/stagnation started in the 1960’s in about 1965. (Great Society?) It was just so small that people did not comment on it til the Reagan years.
          Pensions had their heyday and were not portable and only made sense if you were staying with the same employer for your working years. Even then maybe not a good idea. Many of the original pension plans negotiated between companies and
          unions have found their way into government control of the Pension
          Benefit Guaranty Authority because they became unsustainable. The taxpayer is on the hook.
          They were replaced by Ira’s and 401k”s that were owned by the individual and are portable from job to job.
          My personal Ira”  is way higher than it was in 2001… or even 2008. (of course I pay attention) . The key to success for any income group is to save until it hurts. Set a percentage of income no matter what it is… and save it somehow. Savings bonds. Money market account, whatever. It doesn’t matter how much. (esp if you are young) Just do it. Go without the expensive cell phone plan, Do you really need cable TV when you have Netflix? Take the difference and save. Generations did before you. Why do need to excuse away the fact you don’t want to now?

          1.  If you can’t save $1,000, Save a $100. Cant save that, save $1.00. It has nothing with your status or your income. Set a goal stick to it.

            This advice came from my mother who worked cleaning other people homes when she was single and raising two kids in the 60’s. The numbers changed but the truth remains.

  14.  

    Interesting how the article doesn’t talk about taxes. Sometimes–especially
    after traveling, I am reminded that many states have the vitality of young
    people and diversity. It is nice to have retirees come here, but when I go to
    the midcoast, especially Brunswick, I am struck by how many people know nothing
    about Maine.  Most of the time, they don’t even know where Richmond
    is.  Guess they read Downeast mag for their Maine info.   We’re
    thinking about Mexico (#89 in crime vs #8 for US, don’t believe the hype).

  15. Ironic considering Maine is listed as the worst or second worst place in the USA for retirees.

  16. That is great However what about the young people who work and want to live in the area? I”ve seen the retired folk improve commuites. However there is a consequnce to this. Some want a perfect community of tranquality, no messy industry, little traffic and low tax. Places to walk the dog and trails to walk by the water. It is all wonderful unless you want to make a living, pay for schools, and have jobs that are not tourism/and or service oriented. It is great that I have to move out of state to find a job, put up with what made them retire here. Once I”m worn out and ready to retire I can come back home.

    It is plausible that when I retire I won’t be able to. No SSI in my future. I have to pay for their retirement and mine at the same time.

    That said I respect the retired and want to see them with a good quality of life. But what about me? The Generation they created that is left wanting to live in a working community.

  17. They take them because their low paying, part time, non benefit based jobs. The State gives tax breaks and credits to companies that hire people over 62 or 65 (wold have to look up the number). How can a young person make a living in this era at $10.00 a hour?

  18.  We are compiling a collection of stories told by everyday Boomers (not
    what the media says about them). Please take a look please:
    boomersrememberwhen.com. If you have a story about any part of your life
    you’d like to tell – really anything that sticks in your mind, please email to info@boomersrememberwhen.com – Thanks!

Leave a comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *