SEARSPORT, Maine — Penobscot Bay was as calm and shiny as glass when the tugboat pulled up alongside a bright orange vessel that towered far above it.

The Bow Saga, a Norwegian-flagged ship carrying a load of liquid caustic soda last week for use in Maine’s papermaking industry, needed a pilot to come aboard who was familiar with the local waters to guide it into a berth at the Mack Point industrial dock in Searsport.

So Adam Philbrook of the Penobscot Bay & River Pilots Association got ready to board the much bigger ship. After some shouted conversation with the all-Filipino crew aboard the Bow Saga, the two ships were attached by massive lines and a wood-and-rope Jacob’s ladder was dropped over the side of the big ship.

Philbrook grabbed the ladder and clambered aboard, quickly moving up the side of the big ship.

“One hand for the ship and one hand for yourself,” he had said earlier while still inside the cabin of the tugboat, the Fournier Tractor, describing the sometimes-dangerous job of boarding ships at sea.

It’s a common saying among seamen and it was all in a day’s work for the pilot, who is one part of the intricate system of workers and equipment that keeps shipping in Penobscot Bay moving smoothly and safely.

‘A port is a bridge’

Last year, 3.3 million barrels of petroleum and 1.7 million barrels of liquid bulk goods, including caustic soda, entered Penobscot Bay on tanker and freight ships from all over the world. Those numbers include cargo destined for the ports of Bucksport, Camden, Rockland, Winterport, Belfast and Bangor, too, but much of it was unloaded at Mack Point in Searsport.

The Penobscot Bay town has been a working port for more than 100 years, but these days, instead of tall wooden ships being built on the harbor, the work takes place at the much more industrial-looking Mack Point.

The port and shipping lanes of Penobscot Bay have been in the news lately because of a controversial liquid propane gas terminal, which if built as proposed by Denver-based DCP Midstream would add a large propane tank to Mack Point’s skyline and also four to six propane tanker trips a year to the port. While the 22.7 million gallon tank potentially could be 137 feet tall — much larger than the roughly 50-foot-tall tanks that already are there — port and shipping officials say that safety concerns on the part of the public may be misplaced. Most people do not know how much commerce already occurs at the industrial seaport and how strict the safety regulations already are that govern the shipping of fuel and other materials.

“Most people around here have no idea,” boarding agent Len Young of Stockton Springs said of the activity that happens at Mack Point.

John Henshaw, executive director of the Maine Port Authority, said that Mack Point has been used to import fuel since World War II at least. A pipeline used to run from the port all the way to the former Loring Air Force Base in Aroostook County, he said, and the large tank farm now owned by Sprague Energy was a defense fuels farm.

Jim Therriault, vice president of materials handling at Sprague Energy, said that the industrial port is one of the company’s larger terminals.

“It’s a fairly busy one, because it has a lot of different products,” he said. “This one has a little of everything.”

The property, which boasts 30 tanks, is nearly invisible from the cars whizzing past on nearby Route 1. It once was owned by the now-defunct Bangor and Aroostook Railroad, then was sold in pieces when the company went bankrupt. Sprague Energy now owns much of the facility and Irving Energy leases some property from the state of Maine, which owns part of the port including a deep-water bulk dock.

Therriault said that about 160 ships a year come to the liquid dock to unload their cargoes of heating oil, diesel, gasoline, kerosene, residual fuel oil, asphalt and clay slurry which comes from Brazil and is used in the paper industry.

A much smaller number of ships — between a dozen and three dozen vessels tie up at the bulk dock each year — bring commodities such as road salt, gypsum rock, windmill components and petroleum coke — a fuel similar to coal — to this part of Maine.

According to Therriault and others involved with shipping in midcoast Maine, a brand-new, 144-metric-ton harbor crane purchased by the Maine Port Authority and installed last month at Mack Point hopefully will increase imports and even exports there.

“For the last several years, there’s been a good deal of interest in the potential for exporting wood pellets,” Henshaw said. “That’s an opportunity for Maine. We have a pretty good, healthy wood basket — and we have the ports.”

David Gelinas, president of the Penobscot Bay & River Pilots Association, said that while he understands the concerns of area residents who spoke out against the propane terminal, he believes that the terminal is crucial to the midcoast and beyond.

Shipping by water is much more efficient than even the most technologically advanced trains and also is much cleaner, according to the pilot.

“That port is crucial to central and northern Maine,” he said. “A port, it doesn’t just exist for one town. A port is a bridge. That port, Searsport, connects our bay and our region to the rest of the world. It’s providing an economic benefit to the area.”

He said that he always has seen the use in having a “real industrial working waterfront.”

“That, to me, is the engine that makes society function,” Gelinas said. “You need these commodities, whether you like it or not. This is the world of commerce. You need places along your coast where this type of activity occur.”

‘Layers of oversight’

Shipping and port safety in Penobscot Bay are highly regulated by government and other agencies, according to a U.S. Coast Guard official.

“There are so many layers of oversight,” said Lt. Brierley Ostrander, who works in the Coast Guard’s Marine Safety Detachment in Belfast doing what’s called “port state control.”

“The Coast Guard port state control oversight is just one layer of safety built into the shipping industry,” she said.

Other agencies involved with regulating waterfront facilities such as Mack Point and making sure that such facilities have up-to-date safety plans include the federal Environmental Protection Agency and Waldo County Emergency Management Agency.

Ostrander’s unit is responsible for inspecting vessels, screening foreign vessel arrivals and ensuring safety and security at 23 waterfront facilities, including seven bulk oil facilities, between Owls Head and the Canadian border.

All big vessels coming into Penobscot Bay must give the Coast Guard notice of their arrival, informing officials what they’re carrying, where they’re coming from and which nation’s flag they’re sailing under.

“So we have a big picture of what’s coming in when,” she said.

The Coast Guard runs the ship’s information into a model that assesses potential risk. If a ship scores high enough, Ostrander’s unit could do an offshore boarding — but the vast majority of such actions are done at the dock, after the ship arrives.

However, a crew of Coast Guard officials did board the Bow Saga early this particular morning off Rockland, spending a couple of hours checking the ship for security and safety measures.

“This is an exam,” Ostrander said. “We check the material condition of the ship, the competency of the crew, the currency of the documents.”

If they find a major safety problem, the Coast Guard’s sector commander for Northern New England has the ability to detain or expel the ship.

“But more often than not, it’s ‘fix it,’” she said.

Ostrander said that typical problems could be as small as failing to properly fill out the ship’s garbage log. In the year and a half she has been working in Belfast, the Coast Guard has not needed to detain any vessels.

Ships must meet the standards for Safety of Life at Sea, she said — and the shipping operator also is invested in making sure those standards are met.

“If a ship is stuck at dock, they’re not making any money,” Ostrander said.

And once the ship is docked, safety continues to be a primary concern, Therriault said. Mack Point has a security plan and the 35 workers there have passed a federal background check and security clearance.

“Nobody wanders around the terminal,” he said.

Also, the 30 tanks are within a bermed area which is designed to handle 110 percent of the contents of the tanks.

“There are very strict inspection regimens,” he said.

Periodically, the tanks must be cleaned and X-rayed to determine that they meet a minimum thickness. If not, the tank bottom must be replaced, which isn’t cheap. That can run from $775,000 to $1.5 million, Therriault said.

Steve Miller of the Islesboro Island Trust has spoken out about his concerns with the LPG terminal. He said that Sprague Energy is a responsible Searsport citizen and that his nonprofit group is not terribly worried about the fuels that are now brought in through the bay.

But a large amount of propane is different, he said.

“Right now, if one tank were to catch fire at Mack Point, there isn’t a lot of material to burn. It would be an incredible tragedy if that happened, but it wouldn’t set that area on fire,” he said. “But if there was an LPG tank, with 20 some odd million gallons of explosive fuel — then you’d really have a situation on your hands. It’s the straw that broke the camel’s back.”

According to pilot Gelinas, safety is something that is always on the minds of the people who help tankers and other heavily loaded ships navigate into port at Mack Point. The often-heated debate over the proposed liquid propane gas terminal sometimes seemed short-sighted, he said, with tank opponents stating safety concerns about having propane tankers moving through Penobscot Bay.

“People just don’t seem to know how many ships full of fuel are already coming up through the bay,” he said. “This is not new. This has been an active seaport. I would never try and fault anybody for being concerned, but the arrival of propane isn’t a real game-changer for the port. The vast majority of what we’re moving is petroleum-based, so you need to operate at the highest standard. It requires a real high standard of care.”

Join the Conversation

22 Comments

  1. Abigail..I am not sure what to think.. your article suggests that those who are concerned about  the as yet unsettled and very significant safety issues about the oversized tank DCP is trying to squeeze into the state owned land at Mack Point are simply somehow not aware of the value of the port or the volume of activity that goes on there.

    A ridiculous proposition…actually insulting to the due diligence and science and fact based  discernment on the LPG tank that is represeted in expressed concerns.

    Abigail, this is all about the further “bananism” of Maine,,begun with Baldacci who trained our legislature to serve the “kleptocracy” the “corporatocrcay” that Maine  has become.

    Everything about the State and DEP’s involvement in inviting this LPG terminal is very close to malfeasance in my opinion..a complete betrayal of the public trust.. a complete manipulation of the public in service to corporate profit with no corresponding public benefit.

    Maine is a “banana republic”…we are all enslaved via our governor and our asleep at the wheel legislature to corporate profits.  Your article makes you an instrument of that as well.

    You couldn’t have focused on the kind of possibilities being realized in Belfast Harbor..on the positive vision furthering possibilities of the Searsport port that don’t involve it becoming the arm pit of Maine?

    1. Haven’t the anti-tank people gotten enough ink in the BDN? This is an article about the port  and some of the people involved. It neither purports nor needs to be an objective assessment of the propane proposal.

    2. Ms. Bowker,
      The tugs in the article dock in Belfast, but there is no deepwater dockage there. Searsport & Eastport are great deepwater ports that require almost no maintenance dredging. If you would look across the bay you’ll see Maine Maritime Academy, there are quite a few of us in the state from MMA that make a living doing just what this article illustrates.
      I guess what always gets me is the people protesting this still want to access the product being shipped in, they just want someone else to deal with it. Remember your Volvo Cross Country came here by ship as well.

      1. Hi Bill,

        Personally I love ports and all their work..have all my life and have navigated  a tug or two in my day.( Also was chief navigator bringing the lightship Nantucket to Belfast once)

        My point was that the article suggested people protesting the tank were anti port or didn’t understand the workings of a port.  Objections to the tank had nothing to do with not valuing the work of the port.

        ( I drive a 12 years old jeep wrangler)

  2. Where trade flows, the economy grows. Maine needs active ports like Searsport, Bangor and Eastport to increase its ties to the world beyond its borders.

  3. It is too bad that the quality of the  connections to the port does not match the quality of the port. The DOT sales piece for the container port published in 2009 graded the railroad as class 2-3, and as far as the roads went said that an interstate was 50 or so miles away, with nothing about the road to get there. I challenge Maine DOT people to find an example ( other than Eastport) of another deep water terminal in this country with such poor access to the area that it wants to serve. To get to the west, Searsport needs a bypass which was part of the container port planning back about 2002; to get to the north something needs to be done to get trucks safely past Frankfort and Winterport. And there are bridges on the railroad that date back to the B&A days. The way things are today, fixing these will require funding from the citizens of the entire state. Back when B&A built the port at Cape Jellison in 1905 and then after it burned, developed the Mack point facility in 1926, the stockholders of the company paid for it. Today companies want the public to pay.

  4. Very sad that all or most of the trade is one way into Maine. They rattled off all the goods imported and bought with American Dollars. Funny only wood pellets were mentioned in passing for an export. Do we even export those? Do we export anything from Maine anymore, except our College Graduates who leave Maine in droves.

    1. Exactly…we want diverse local economies with value added to our natural resources in local Maine communities for products that have world wide markets..the Lincoln Mill is a wonderful example of a transformation and Lincoln of a town that is building its tourism industrty along side the mill.  They are not inherently incompatible..it just takes crearivity, imagination and a little visionary suppport from the State or at least the State  not constantly stepping on local communities.

  5. I grew up in Searsport and loved to watch the ships come into the bay thru our living room window.  It was nice to read an article about the port and how it works and some of the history behind it.  I have been to Mack Point once or twice as a girl and am proud of the seafaring history of the town.  Thanks for the article and the accompanying nostalgia. 

  6. Mr. Gelinas,

    I don’t have a dog in this fight but have listened to the debate on the
    proposed LPG storage tank and haven’t heard much in the way of concerns
    over the tankers carrying LPG on the bay into Mack Point.  The concerns I
    am hearing are related to the situation on land…. an LPG facility is
    considered more dangerous than a LNG facility yet who ultimately has
    oversight of the facility,  will such a facility require a paid fire and
    safety department, how much will the town need to pay for these
    services, who is going to pay for the road and rail improvements so
    desperately needed in the town?…to name a few.

    Accidents do happen even at Mack Point.  Remember the jet fuel line
    break that flooded Long Cove or the derailment of rail cars heading
    north of GAC years ago?  While the opponents or concerned citizens seem
    short sighted to you, it may be that the cavalier attitude toward  land
    based safety and infrastructure requirements have not been discussed
    with the public.  There have been many presentations and hearings but
    not a discussion or public informational session around emergency plans
    for the public.  We all love to see the ships come into the harbor yet
    many wonder why hasn’t industry been more involved working with the
    town? 

    Thank you

  7. A very nice piece!  It’s nice to finally see our town and our port brought into a positive light!  The pilots, tug crews and US Coast Guard do great work.

      It was a little odd to see Lindsay Newland Bowker jumping on Ms. Curtis for writing this piece, but I don’t seem to recall anyone doing the same when Ms. Curtis wrote pieces for TBNT.   And while some the products brought into the port were listed, the things that are sent out weren’t. Paper from the Millinocket mills and lumber from the saw mills in Aroostook County are just a couple of the things recently sent out of our port.     Mack Point doesn’t JUST serve Searsport. As Mr Gelinas stated, it benefits the ENTIRE State of Maine. Let’s stop killing the rest of the state by allowing a few short sighted people to close the doors on our port!

    1. I think that “Getoffthestool makes an excellent point: ” While the opponents or concerned citizens seem short sighted to you, it may be that the cavalier attitude toward  land based safety and infrastructure requirements have not been discussed 
      with the public.  There have been many presentations and hearings but 
      not a discussion or public informational session around emergency plans 
      for the public.  We all love to see the ships come into the harbor yet 
      many wonder why hasn’t industry been more involved working with the 
      town? ” It is precisely the cavalier attitude of public officials like the Searsport fire chief that has under-minded public confidence in Searsport. A good leader facilitates conversation, and takes the public’s fears seriously. Instead he and Town Selectman Demaris and EMS Director Rivers continue to perpetuate “father knows best” attitudes with an overwhelming degree of arrogance and sarcasm in their public commentary. These men may be well trained and skilled at handling emergency situations, but leadership is more than just having technical skills. A good leader is kind, thoughtful,  and reflective.  (especially in public) They instill confidence by leading public forums wherein they listen respectfully and take the lead on finding answers that address questions raised by concerned members of their community, (of which there are considerable numbers not the “few short sighted people” referenced in your comment). A good leader is always respectful, and quite frankly demonstrates prudence and measured decision making on issues of this magnitude. These men lack the grace that true leadership calls for and this is terribly disappointing.

      1.   I didn’t realize that Mr. Rivers received a promotion and is now heading up the EMS Department as well as being the town’s EMA Director.  I wonder if anyone has told Mr. Morse about this??? BTW, who is Selectman Demaris? I don’t remember seeing him at any meetings..

        1. SFD220: you illustrate my point about arrogance and disrespect perfectly and right on cue. A couple of typos and you profess ignorance at what I’m writing. Your disingenuousness is transparent and tiresome.

      2. Eloquent Suzanne..I agree completely that the port and its activities need to be more transparent and clear and that there appears to be a need for a better ongoing relationship with the entire community. I am a complete outsider but I heard at the outset that the tank triggered a lot of ongoing underlying fears, concerns and uncertainties about what is stored at the port, who looks after these things, how the public is protected.  If there were a history of better communications between the Port and the Town and nearby affected communities navigating the possibility of this ginormous tank  might have been less divisive and less polarizing and painful.

      3.  Suzanne, 

          Chief Dittmeier, Mr. Rivers and the representatives from DCP have answered the questions and concerns that the opposition brought to light. Unfortunately, they were not the answers that they were looking for because they weren’t lining up with the “research” that they had done. I saw the presentations that were made in town. The video of the Sunrise Propane incident in Toronto… that’s comparing apples to oranges. 

            I read the comments posted here about this article, and the fear that some of these folks have I’m sure is valid. BUT, if we lived in a society driven, regulated and based on fear and fear alone we would all still be riding horses and this great electronic media would not exist. Yes, 22.7M gallons is a lot, but do some true comparative research. There haven’t been any failures of a facility like this. Tractor trailer tankers carrying propane are designed and built to withstand a hell of a lot of abuse. Look at the accident down in Beddington a couple months ago, that tank did exactly as it was designed to do. There are already tractor trailers going through Searsport carrying propane, they have been here a long time.  Train cars carrying propane are built to higher standards than a tanker trailer and will withstand a derailment and pile-up.

            The comment was made a few weeks before the town meeting here in Searsport that after the vote the town would come back together, I haven’t seen it. There was a divide in this town before DCP had ever thought of even LOOKING at Searsport. This only made it more evident and a little stronger. 

             As for this article, I believe that it was well written and touched on a lot of points. BUT as with anything in this world, not everyone can and will be pleased. I have my opinions about this, and it’s more than obvious that the folks that commented here have theirs. The one thing that we all have in common is that we live in a great country such as this, and for now we still have the freedom of speech.

           

        1. Thanks AJ… I appreciate your response. We all need to be having conversations like this. We’ve all learned a lot about propane and how it behaves over the past six months. We all have our bias perspectives, but with conversation perhaps we can come to a better understanding about how we can move forward as a community. Almost everyone I know who is opposed to the tank completely understands the need for people to have meaningful, well paid work. Most people I know who oppose the tank are not the stereotypes portrayed by DCP’s propaganda machine and in comments made by our town’s fire chief. Your fire chief. I’m sure he is a skilled technician. He has the credentials, at least. But as I’ve said before it takes more than technical skills to instill confidence in leadership. The issues that opponents of the tank have around safety have yet to be put to rest. People who have fears about the safety of the project, have not been swayed your way because they have been dismissed as alarmist instead of being respected and given answers. AJ… there have not been answers. If you believe that comparing Searsport to Toronto is apples to oranges, then please help people understand why. The explosion in Toronto was due to an illegal transfer of fuel from one truck to another. How can you be so sure nothing like that would happen in Searsport? We should be having a conversation about the increase in truck traffic. Its not enough to just say that we already have trucks with propane rolling through Searsport. With increased numbers turning out onto route one (and that is one of my issues), the probability of a collision increases. But look at it from an economic perspective. The Department of transportation says that they can’t afford to fix the roads right now… with more trucks pounding down, the roads will only continue to deteriorate and will do so at an increased rate. Who will pay for road repairs? Its a fair conversation. Perhaps one that could include DCP as part of the solution. But since we aren’t having any conversations about these things, nothing gets resolved. There are no answers. Only polarization. I hold DCP accountable for their lack of transparency, for their manipulations of community and for their manipulation of good people like yourself. They have no qualms about using people. People in small towns like Searsport mean nothing to a corporation only interested in the millions they stand to make. Its all very sad.

    2. Yes, the port serves the whole state more than it serves Searsport.
      Just as you are self-serving in using this forum to attack those who don’t agree with you.

      Who is trying to close the port?

       

    3. SFD220 you are absolutely right that a port by its very nature serves a community far beyond the port itself, not just the local community.  So part of being a port community is understanding and accepting that.

      Still, all port operations should have due regard for the local community and certainly as respects safety and hazards and direct conflict with other uses as valued and expressed in the community’s land use and zoning plan.

      In that sense one cannot object to an LPG tank or any other port facility that serves regional or even international markets on that ground alone.    But safety hazards are certainly relevant and still undetermined for this particular facility.

      I would love to see endless ships leaving that port laden with  Maine produced goods in which value was added in Maine communities.

      I did come down hard on Abigail for the reasons alreday stated.  There were lots of ways after all that has happened to attempt to bring balalnce and reconcilitaion to a community torn apart over this.  Abigail didn’t explore those possibilities..at least not in this writing..

    4. TO SFD220:
      Since you declare that the Searsport port serves the ENTIRE state of Maine, seems then you should understand why the state of Maine PEOPLE deserve a say in the decision-making.

      There are hundreds of people who oppose this tank on numerous serious grounds.  They continue to speak out although they have no vote.  You have intentionally fanned dissent and bad-will – we have all read your comments and heard you.  You behavior is unprofessional, short-sighted, small minded.  Whether this tank happens or not, you have been instrumental in helping to give  Searsport a bad reputation, certainly in the surrounding communities.  No doubt you are happy about this, and proud. One way or another, the negative energy you have dispersed into the region will backfire on Searsport, and you will have been greatly responsible for it.

Leave a comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *