Maine’s primary elections are still months away but the race for Sen. Olympia Snowe’s seat is already shaping up to be the liveliest contest for U.S. Senate in the state in more than a decade and a half.

There are now six candidates hoping to be the first person in more than 30 years to defeat Snowe at the ballot box, with the possibility of additional contenders entering the race before the mid-March qualification deadline.

The two Republicans, Scott D’Amboise of Lisbon Falls and Andrew Ian Dodge of Harpswell, have been running for a year or longer. Two new Democrats — Sen. Cynthia Dill of Cape Elizabeth and home builder Benjamin Pollard of Portland — recently joined Rep. Jon Hinck of Portland and former Secretary of State Matt Dunlap of Old Town on their party’s slate of would-be senators. Both parties will choose nominees on June 12.

If all six current challengers qualified for their respective ballots, the 2012 Senate race would feature the largest field of candidates since 1996 when Snowe’s Republican counterpart from Maine, Sen. Susan Collins, won her first term.

Snowe, a moderate Republican seeking her fourth term in the Senate, has substantial nationwide name recognition and a campaign war chest flush with $3.4 million and climbing, as of the end of December. She is also a formidable campaigner.

But several factors could make this Snowe’s most competitive race in years.

“It is going to be a much tougher road than she had six years ago,” said Jim Melcher, a political scientist at the University of Maine Farmington. “She is still going to have to sweat a little bit, but there is no question she is the favorite.”

For her part, Snowe already has a campaign office in South Portland and a staff of five headed by a veteran manager who has worked for some of the biggest names in the Senate GOP.

“She is taking nothing for granted,” Snowe campaign manager Justin Brasell said last week. “She is going to run an aggressive campaign and work to earn the support of Mainers again. She, of course, has a job to do [in Washington] and will continue to do that as well.”

A number of factors appear to be driving the surge in interest in Snowe’s seat.

D’Amboise, who announced his candidacy in early 2010, and Dodge are hoping to tap into sentiments among some Maine Republicans that Snowe is not fiscally conservative enough or who are still smarting over her support for President Obama’s stimulus package. Both men are also campaigning on issues of personal freedom, appealing to members of the tea party movement that helped usher Republican Gov. Paul LePage — a Snowe supporter — into the Blaine House.

D’Amboise has also traded sharp exchanges with Snowe over a lawsuit filed against Education Management Corp. because her husband, former Maine Gov. John McKernan, served as CEO and board chairman of the company.

Neither men has, to date, garnered a groundswell of support from GOP faithful. But D’Amboise pointed out on Sunday that his campaign has raised more than $500,000 so far — more than any previous Snowe challenger.

While he said he doesn’t expect to be able to match Snowe dollar-for-dollar, he believes people want a choice.

“We are out speaking about the fact that we need to get back to the conservative principles of the Republican party: fiscally conservative and morally conservative,” he said.

Melcher speculated that LePage’s early backing of Snowe may have discouraged other Republicans from entering the race. Democrats, meanwhile, perceive Snowe as moving to the political right to counter her primary challengers, which they hope could make her vulnerable among moderates and independents come November, he said.

Additionally, Democrats may be hoping to benefit from President Obama’s re-election campaign and the referendum on same-sex marriage, both of which may draw more young voters to the polls, Melcher said.

“But clearly Olympia Snowe is the favorite to win the primary and the favorite to win the general election,” he said.

Dunlap said at this point he is focused entirely on the June 12 primary, not the November election. But he believes that the struggling economy and discontent with Washington may be driving the unusually high interest among Democrats in challenging Snowe.

“People that I talked to — and a lot of them are independents or Republicans — are saying it is time for a change,” Dunlap said. “I think it is great, given how tough things are right now, that people are willing to step up” and run for office.

Mainers who plan to attend the coming regional party caucuses can expect to see the candidates or their representatives in attendance as they work to collect enough petition signatures to qualify for the ballot. And Brasell said Snowe plans to make caucus appearances all over the state as well.

Join the Conversation

72 Comments

  1. In the State that Maine is now in due to Paul LaPage I should hope that Mrs. Snow will step up to the plate and get things more headed in the right direction or face defeat in the poles.  I for one will not be voting for anyone in this administration unless its take a 180 degree trun.

  2. If she has all that money raised, can’t she just buy the election?  I have voted for Olympia in every election so far.  Due to the horrid acts of both parties in Washington, I am planning on voting against her.  Not necessarily for anyone, just against her.  We need to clean both houses in congress – and Augusta for that matter.  No More Incumbents!  

    1. Gothgirl has a lotta splainning to do.  Did she really think that we would forget about all those anything goes spending votes.. and her single vote letting Obamacare out of her committee.. increasing the debt ceiling without any offsets, the Patriot Act without any admendments, sancturary cities without complaint .. Bank bailouts without questions .. tax on energy companies to drive up prices .. windpower stimulus .. ethanol  subsidies ..  and generally giving Obama free range for four years. When your ripe … it’s time to go.    

      1. Lets not forget how we give Billions to energy companies every year for reseach while they have huge profits or the Drug makers which are in the same boat. just a thought

    2. Absitively, posolutely.

      My voting strategy over the past several cycles has been to Vote the Bums Out.  I vote only for challengers, no incumbents, regardless of political party affiliation.  Some I win, most I lose due to the huge financial advantage incumbents enjoy.  Time is long overdue for real/meaningful campaign finance reform, especially now that corporations and unions have evolved into people.  Charles Darwin must be rolling over in his grave.  But, I’ll bet he votes in Chicago every election.

    3. Exactly.  I have voted against her also, even when I was a registered republican.  Collins is the other reason I became an independant.  They have hurt their party on several occassions. 

    4. Being from Maine, still owning a farm there, but having worked in DC for the past 32 years, I can tell you seniority means a lot in the Senate.  Be careful what you wish for when changing horses in mid-stream these days.  Often, the last ones in are the first ones out the next time around.

      Senator Snowe is a moderate Republican at a time when we need many more moderate Republicans.  The Tea Party crowd is inexperienced, cannot get anything done, is a small disaster, and a thorn in the side of the leadership.  On the House side, I do not know how the Speaker retains what composure he has.  If Tip O’Neill were running the place, the crap we see and the obstructionism we witness would not exist.

      We are unique.  We have two female, Republican Senators.  I am reminded of Margaret Chase Smith and her tenacity.  She stuck with it through some of the vilest and most embarrassing periods of Senate and Republican history – McCarthyism.  Today, we are faced with a similar challenge and the Republican party is no less embarrassed.  Anyone who has heard Senator Snowe speak from the floor of the Senate would realize her skills, intelligence, and ability to work with others.  Contrast this with the Tea Party crowd.  Where is the brilliant leader and spokesperson in that rabble?  Do we want the eloquent elocution of another LePage?  Please, I can barely raise my Republican head from the shame I already must endure.

      My vote would be for Senator Snowe.

        1. There are a couple of schools of thought on this, I realize.  So far, I am thoroughly unimpressed with the Tea Party.  The goal, after all, is to get something done.  I see little getting done in Congress.  One leader (who I will not name) looked quizzically at the camera and said, “Compromise?  A person should not compromise on his principles.”

          Okay, noble thought.  Still, nothing is getting done.

          Part of the problem is that we think of policy in four-year increments, conveniently matching up with the Presidential elections.  Some policies by necessity will need to span a longer time-frame.  I think of the Tea Party as kind of like that credit-card payment collector.  He does not care how or why.  He only want the entire debt paid down today.  Period.  It does not matter that kids need food, a house payment is due, a car payment is due, and a health insurance premium is due.  The Tea Party wants the kids to starve, the house to be sold, and the insurance canceled, just so the debt can be paid off.

          To me, a more practical method would be to have a longer-term debt pay-down plan, a reasonable reduction in expenditures, a gradual cutback of staff through early retirement and attrition.  The economy only works when money is moving.  Killing the economy by cutting back on everything (roads, infrastructure, etc.) will not get more cash coming in.  This is no different than the bill collector kicking the people out of their homes, repossessing their cars, and seizing their accounts.  Once you do that, the person cannot get to work (no car), loses their job, and ends up in a shelter or on welfare. 

          We cannot do the same thing to our economy.  The Tea Party does not seem to grasp this basic business concept.  Then, much opposite to their stated goals of “fix the economy,” they put forth such dingbats as Perry, Bachmann, Palin, and Santorum who are ultra-right wing on social issues that would cost the government not a dime, and in fact, might actually make money and stimulate the economy.  But, their precious bible, taken absolutely literally, comes first.

          I do not understand how Snowe and normal people in Congress can put up with these people.  We have a word for them in DC:  Nuts.

          1. No, my take is different, the Tea Party helped elect these Congressmen and Senators and the Governor. They did not keep their promises to the Tea Party people. They got elected, got the power and threw the Tea overboard.  

      1. Do they have a union in the Senate?   If so, that’s what’s wrong with the house and senate. We need to have the best people in their to do the people’s work. Time for term limits.

        1. No, not a union.  Perhaps, a “club.”  Congress traditionally has worked together.  One member helps another.  That comes from trust, compromise, and a willingness to work together for the country.  These days, it is “my way or the highway,” with the predictable results you see now – nothing gets accomplished.

          There used to be a concept, “the loyal opposition.”  That is, someone wins and someone loses.  But, at the end of the day, the loser may disagree and voice those disagreements but  he works with the party in power to achieve the goals of that administration.  No so today.  The goal today is to block everything, prevent progress, and work as hard as possible to get the winner out of office.

          We hear the Tea Party crowd yapping on about their only goal is to make Obama a one-term president.  So, they’d vote for anyone as long as he defeats Obama?  What kind of attitude is that?  I would say childish, immature, self-serving, and hardly the behavior of a gentleman or gentlewoman.  Rude and ill-mannered also come to mind.

          I see the point on term limits but it really takes tenure to get to know the people, the issues, the way things are done.   I would not so lightly dismiss experience.  The institutions and agencies Congress must deal with on a daily basis have longevity far longer than any one member of Congress.  With term limits, you could have an agency stall until that member is out of office.  Do recall a Senator’s term is six-years while a Congressman’s is only two-years.  They hardly get into office and get their feet wet before they are expected to again be on the campaign trail.  This is not an easy job and it takes time to learn the ropes.  That is, if you plan to actually get anything done.

          1. My whole point was the grid lock thats happening now and how the people need more control over that. States have term limits and so does the President. I believe it’s something that needs to be address in the Congress. Thanks for your insight.

      2. Seniority is the problem. Those seniors put a stranglehold on process. I would much prefer someone who is not corrupted by the system. You simply cannot work in that environment for that long and not be corrupted. Here is a simple example. I have written both my Senators, my representatives, about an issue I feel deeply about. I have NEVER received anything but a form letter, often not even close in content to the concerns I raised.  So my representatives in the Senate do not ‘hear’ me. Whether they agree with me or not is not the point. I want to be heard. At this point only lobbyists are heard. Recent study at Kansas U. found that for every dollar a corporation pays a lobbyist they receive a return of $220. That is a 22,000% profit from lobbying efforts. That needs to stop.

        1. Sorry, but the problem in the House and Senate currently is the freshmen, elected by the TeaParty. It is their sole desire to bring this administration to its knees, regardless of the collateral damage. Okay, KayakMomma, so you want to be heard. Well, so do I and from what I can see of your post, you seem to think that your’s is the only voice that matters. And there’s the problem.

          1. Out of 99 Senators how many are Tea Party Senators…there are 4. Certainly represents a majority. Yep can’t pass the legislation blame the Tea Party Senators. Out of 435 Congressmen there are 70 Tea Party Congressmen. Yep represents the majority. This mess has been going on long before the Tea Party entered the picture. Now you have a reason and a place to put blame. It’s irrelevant.

      3. The Senate is the choke point for all legislation. My question to you would be …how many senior senators are there and how long have they been there? How many Tea Party Senators are there (4). I want some of what your’e smokin’. Keep the status quo and keep on tuckin’ it to the American people. If youv’e worked in DC the past 32 years. you are a part of the problem not part of the solution.

    5. I have been a Republican since I first registered to vote many years ago. I do agree in recent years on every issue (not just complaining) that I have contacted Senator Snowes office (recently against SOPA) I have felt disregard and please excuse the slang being “blown off”. My teenage son who I had hoped to learn how to use his voice was listening to this phone conversation. He said: ‘You know they never wrote down a thing (name on a list) don’t you?’ I said: ‘I would like to think they did, but I know (sounding defeated)’. Not a very good lesson for a teenager.  It’s time for new representation, no matter Snowes connections, committees, and war chest. I of course favor Republican’s, but somebody who listens to their constituents would sway my vote.

      1. They all listen till they hit D.C., then money talks and we the people do not matter so much till they want our votes again. This how both parties work. How rich can I get in Washington after all once I serve one term I’ll never have to worry about medical bills again either.

      2. We only have one party in politics, the Republicrat party, they all work for the bankers.  Vote for the candidate who you agree with, vote your conscience because this is the way we can change this country. Do not vote to help the bankers they steal from us all, we work to pay the interest like slaves, it is not right.

        1. Agreed. They are both in the pockets of whoever gives them the most money. There is no difference whatsoever. Oh sure they tell us what we want to hear and then it’s back to running for re-election as soon as they get into office. Insider trading. lobbying, you name it they are all guilty of the same thing. Where is Richard Pryor when we need him so that I can vote for “none of the above” ?

  3. She’s just a has-been republican. Due to the crazy gov we have and the fact the republicans will not stand up against him, I will NEVER vote republican again.

  4. Let’s make her a deal. She gets to keep her powerful position in Washington if she can convince her husband, Jock to turn over $50-$100 million that he essentially stole via sweet/unethical/illegal lobbying deals in Washington to help balance our State budget. Oh, that’s right we can’t ask rich folks to pay extra for their windfall profits, especially when they themselves and their windfalls have cause the rest of us so-so-so much suffering. Never mind!

    1. The alliance between LePage and Snowe puzzles me.  How are all the hard core LePage supporters going to vote for Senate candidates?  Against Snowe?  Are they one and the same?

    1. When was Snowe EVER a part of the private sector (okay, maybe while in high school and college)? Pretty much from the time she graduated from college she’s been involved, and employed in, politics.

      1. True, but it will give us a different face and name to complain about.
         However if we don’t like the people who are running and NO one votes, they’ll have to put the dog catcher in as a stand-in until a new batch of crooks arise for the ashes of h_ll and maybe the dog catcher can do a better job.

  5. America needs a new breed of politicians who will admittingly recognize and respond accordingly to the obvious root of Americas ongoing economic disaster; that being free trade. The politicians who are in office now are seemingly only  there to protect their very own Wall Street investments, Wall Street and the corporations they work for while destroying the country that they were elected to protect and solve the problems America faces.  In 1994 America was the most superrior and powerful country in the world. Then came NAFTA to which was only the beginning of the decimation of employment in America.                               

  6. GOOD, GOOD, & Great. finally we have some choices. Six against  Snowe, Raye going against Michaud, anyone going against Pingree yet? The time has come to end the Washington parlor game and make some radical changes. I don’t care who I vote for as long as it is someone who has not served in Washington.

      1. Well, I got that from the 2 Republicans running against Snowe in the Primary, and I would guess 4 Democrats running to be the opponent in November. So I am counting all the not just the moment and November. But then you are correct it will be one on one in November.

    1. Yeah, Raye’s an outsider……NOT! He spent 17 years working FOR Snowe, including six years as her chief of staff, before quitting to run for District 2 House seat, which he LOST, so he’s spent the last eight years as a state senator and is running for District 2 again. Sounds like a career politician to me. And his mustard isn’t very good either.

      1. I didn’t know Raye worked for Snowe…I don’t like his mustard either. I guess I can count him out.

    2. Kevin Raye worked for Sen. Snowe for many years, last as her chief-of-staff inWashington before he returned to Maine. A newcomer to politics, patrick calder, has announced his candidacy to challenge Rep. Pingree in the 1st Congressional District. 

  7. Senator Snowe has held one office or another since the 1970s.  State Legislature, Congress, Senate.
     
    Her financial reports during that time, up until 2004, show her net worth to have been in six figures.
     
    In 2001 she was placed on the Senate Finance Committee, the committee charged with regulating Wall Street.
     
    Just three years later, in 2004 her net worth jumped into multimillion-dollar levels.  During this time, the Wall Street (too big to fail) bank Goldman Sachs bought 40% of her husband’s company.  Two Goldman Sachs executives are on the company’s board of directors, voting on what her husband will be paid.
     
    In committee, Senator Snowe voted against regulating her partner Goldman Sachs.
     
    In 2008, due to weak regulations and misbehavior by Wall Street Banks, including Goldman Sachs, the U.S. financial system melted down, threatening the entire U.S. economy which fell into recession. Millions of Americans were thrown out of work.
     
    Senator Snowe then voted to bail out her partner Goldman Sachs, giving it billions of taxpayer dollars.
     
    She voted against regulations and then to give billions to Goldman Sachs.

    Goldman Sachs votes on the board of directors to give her millions.
     
     Nice arrangement.

    So far, Senator Snowe has raised over three million dollars from contributors who want to convince us to keep her in office for six more years.

    1. Senator Snowe is evidently in cahoots with Goldman Sachs and their behaviour appears to be consistent with the RICO statute, that is the Racketeer Influenced and Corrupt Organizations Act: 18 USC 1964, United States Code. This has a ten year jail sentence in a federal penitentiary. Pass it on.

    2. Agreed.
      They all should be made to sign a legally binding document that if they are in office for more than one term, they would immediately be sent to prison. Our legislature both state and senate was never intended to be a life long profession.

  8. Only a foolish mind would vote to keep Snowe in office as she has been entrenched in politics and the bankers money that is destroying this country.  She is a snow job.

  9. Anyone but Snow.  Sadly with all the money she’s acquired while serving she’ll most likely buy this election again.  

  10. It is great to see so many wanting to replace the far beyond her time, Olympia Snowe, but be careful here folks.  With so many candidates running against her, it splits the votes against her as well….which could easily allow those that believe she is the best thing that ever happened to this state since blueberries to keep her in there…please dont allow that to happen…Pretty Please.

  11. At some point it is necessary to get a fresh horse to go the
    further distance especially when the other has done its duty. Senator Snowes
    has been in office since I was a boy. I remember meeting her years ago, she
    does not remember me. My Dad was a big supporter in the party of then
    Congresswoman Snowe. For that much time spent in office, first as a member of Congress,
    and then as a Senator; Maine
    should be in much better shape then it is in presently. If the senior member
    theory holds any water Mainer’s should not have worries of their needs
    employment, financing, infrastructure, business atmosphere and creation, and
    jobs. Welfare would not be the rule, it would be the exception. The
    representation of Maine in Washington
    has left something to be desired in recent years. Every industry in Maine
    has taken, and continues to take significant hits. Though some have fallen to obsolescence
    and time, others have been stolen away by other states and countries
    representatives pushing and passing legislation and funding benefiting their
    own and constituents. The progression of Maine
    into industries has become greatly hinged upon pittances delivered once in
    awhile by representatives merely in hopes of securing the vote for another term
    in office. This done all in order to secure their stature, leisure, and life
    style on the Washington scene. Our
    representatives noted by many as the most prominent, long serving, or influential…all
    the while we living back here in Maine
    struggle as we have for years to make ends meet.

  12. Good to know that these six people have the time and money to waste on this. I’m not a fan of Snowe, but it’s a done deal.

  13. As a Democrat I’ve voted consistently for Senator Snowe.  I’ll do the same this year, especially if she is challenged by a teapublican.  

  14. Term limits from the voting booth is what I advocate. Pick another Republican please. If we send a Democrat  or an Independent  to Congress after 12 years I will ask the same thing. Hopefully in the meantime we will organize in our states to put in place a constitutional amendment on term limits. It works well for us here in Maine, and it would work even better in Washington.

  15. which Democrat do we vote for?
    Can you recall any announcement from Snowe’s
    office where she identifies herself as a Republican?  or embracing GOP
    principles?
    I had to a least crack a smile 2 weeks ago … Bangor Daily News
    article saying that Snowe frequently has a higher approval rating among
    Democrats than from her base …e.g. Republicans.
    However, I have always held
    Snowe in very high regard as a brilliant political strategist …. tying up the
    Republican ticket, securing their vote and being a Moderate Democrat, securing a
    majority of the Democrat vote and a major block of Independents …. the Goal,
    “Electability” …. she excels.
    The Democrats in Maine can not resist .. they
    are obliged to always field a candidate to the Left of Snowe … they don’t have
    to … what if they were smart enough to figure out that if they fielded a “Blue
    Dog” Democrat … a Democrat that was to the Right of Snowe… they might have a
    very good chance of drawing more Republicans to their ticket than
    Snowe.

    have some humor in your day

  16. A
    democracy cannot exist as a permanent form of government. It can only exist
    until the voters discover that they can vote themselves largess out of the public
    treasury. From that moment on, the majority always votes for the candidate
    promising the most benefit from that public treasury, with the result that
    a democracy will always collapse from a loose fiscal policy, always to be followed
    by a dictatorship.

  17. I taught 9th grade Civics out of college in the late 70s. Unless they’ve changed the system, having long term powerful Senators makes a small state like ours with only 4 people representing us way more influential than we would be with nubies. Try keeping Kittery open with freshmen.

    1. Your logic is very flawed. You want to keep a corrupt politician because she has voted No for 20 years. Never represents the poor folk of Maine. Last time I looked, Maine has lost all of its military bases except one with Snowe at the helm.

      1. How many people has she kept working at BIW  ? If it was not for her over 5,500 would be out of work

    2. If this is true then our system is very flawed. A new member should have the same voting power as a lifer. Unless the lifer has decided to let them selves be bought by outside interest. I am assuming this is the way it is done.

      1. Most of the nations business takes place in committees. New members have less significant positions than veterans. If a bill never makes it out of committee, neither the House or the Senate can vote on it. How you get a position on a particular committee is all politics.

  18. During the past five years, Sen. Snowe’s net worth has fluctuated between 18 and 32 million dollars.  This number has also included her husband’s wealth who was once governor and congressman.  Public service should not result in that type of wealth.  Sen. Snowe should explain how she was able to accumulate this wealth while serving the public good.  She is part of the political establishment and what has been her record of accomplishment except for commendations from the liberal press when she votes with Democrats.  A different person is needed to deviate from lobbyist and from an ineffective Senate.

  19. Both of our senators have gotten entirely to0 comfortable in their positions.  How I wish we had term limits.  Susan Collins promised the Maine people that she would serve only one term, yet here we are how many years later?  I’ve not been pleased with Snowe’s representation for quite some time but things have really come to a head in my mind since Barak Obama was elected to the White House.  I’m furious with Snowe for casting the deciding vote that allowed Obamacare to make it out of Committee and her support of the out of control spending is the last straw for me.  I call her, Scott Brown (D-Massachusetts), and Collins “Dumb, Dumber, and Dumbest” because not one of them truly represents the will of the people of elected them.  It’s time for some fresh blood. 

  20. At this stage I will vote for anybody except Snowe. She has become a millionaire from all the payoffs she has collected. Snowe got to GO !!!!!!!!!!!

Leave a comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *