AUGUSTA, Maine — The federal agency that will decide whether some of Gov. Paul LePage’s proposed Medicaid cuts qualify for waivers to make the reductions legal reaffirmed Thursday that the exemptions face long odds.

In a written response to the Democratic leaders on the Legislature’s budgetary committee, the federal Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services confirmed that legislative action was not a consideration in whether the agency will grant a waiver from the federal health care law.

Cindy Mann, the director of CMS, noted that no state has been granted a so-called Maintenance of Effort waiver from the Affordable Care Act. Mann added that Maine could only achieve the Medicaid waiver, known as Section 1115 in the Social Security Act, if it were adopting an experimental project designed to expand coverage — not to achieve budgetary savings.

“The purpose of Medicaid is to provide high-quality health care coverage to needy individuals whose income and resources are insufficient to meet the costs of necessary medical services,” Mann wrote. “Reductions in eligibility solely for budgetary purposes would not be experimental, pilot or demonstration projects that further the purposes of the program.”

By that standard, none of the proposals in the governor’s budget would appear to qualify for the 1115 waiver.

Mann did not explicitly rule out the exemption. However, it appears the governor’s proposals face a steep challenge to obtain waivers that represent $37 million of his $220 million budget cuts at the Department of Health and Human Services.

“It is clear from the letter that HHS can only grant a waiver when a state proposes a demonstration project that promotes the purpose of the Medicaid program, that is to provide coverage to people in need,” said Ana Hicks, senior policy analyst from Maine Equal Justice Partners. “The letter makes it clear that proposals made solely to balance the budget do not meet this legal standard.”

Lead Democrats on the Legislature’s Appropriations Committee said the letter reaffirmed what they had suspected all along.

“I’ve contended from the beginning that the governor’s budget is irresponsible and deeply harmful to thousands of Mainers,” said Rep. Peggy Rotundo, D-Lewiston. “We’ve also raised questions about the legality of the proposal. We now have confirmation many of his cuts are in fact not legal.”

Rotundo, along with Sen. Dawn Hill, D-York, sought confirmation from CMS in a pair of letters sent two weeks ago. The letters followed news reports and testimony from health care advocates indicating that federal waivers would be difficult to obtain.

Hill said the response from CMS showed that lawmakers would be taking a big gamble if they authorized the cuts that required federal waivers.

“If we vote for this, we are putting the state in a position to face stiff federal penalties that could include the federal government withholding all of our Medicaid dollars,” Hill said.

Lawmakers on Appropriations have grilled the administration about the likelihood, and potential penalties, of obtaining the federal waivers. DHHS Commissioner Mary Mayhew has said the budget proposal is written in a way that ensures the cuts receive the waivers before going into effect, thus safeguarding the state from additional federal penalties.

Mayhew’s comments, however, are different from LePage’s initial pitch. The governor in December went so far as to say that legislative action was recommended by U.S. Department of Health and Human Services Secretary Kathleen Sebelius during a conversation she and the governor had last April.

Mann, who wrote the letter sent Thursday to lawmakers, is a top official working for Sebelius.

Said Hill, “We’ve had reservations about this proposal from the beginning, yet we’ve been asked to build parts of our budget based on fiction.”

Adrienne Bennett, the governor’s spokeswoman, recently acknowledged that the administration knew legislative action wasn’t a requirement for the federal waiver. Bennett said legislative approval was designed to pressure Sebelius into awarding the waivers.

That strategy did not work for Arizona last year when the state sought a massive overhaul of its Medicaid program. Sebelius denied all of that state’s request for exemptions from the federal health care law.

Wisconsin has also sought a waiver. The federal government has yet to act on it.

Mayhew, in a written statement, emphasized that DHHS had not submitted a waiver request to Secretary Sebelius. However, she said, the administration was “prepared to fight and take our case to Washington.”

“We will do so when the Legislature has acted,” Mayhew wrote. “The letter from CMS is not in response to a specific request and proposal from Governor LePage seeking to waive the Maintenance of Effort. The fact of the matter is Maine must balance its budget and must address the overspending in the Medicaid program.”

She added, “We will work closely with our delegation to make the necessary case to waive the MOE provision in order to balance our budget and preserve services for more than 280,000 Maine people.”

Thursday’s response from CMS was significant in itself. The agency had been tight-lipped about the waivers, despite several inquiries by the Sun Journal, other news outlets and state and federal lawmakers.

The agency’s silence perhaps reflects the delicate political climate hovering over President Barack Obama’s Affordable Care Act and states’ push for more flexibility in Medicaid budgeting.

The pressure presents a dilemma for the Obama administration, which is balancing the viability of its signature legislative achievement, the ACA, with the perception that the law is hamstringing governors’ budget decisions.

Rotundo said the CMS response resulted from pressure from Democratic U.S. Reps. Chellie Pingree and Mike Michaud.

Hill and Rotundo said they planned to share the CMS response with the Republican co-chairmen on Appropriations, Sen. Richard Rosen, R-Bucksport, and Rep. Patrick Flood, R-Winthrop.

The committee was scheduled to hold party caucuses Thursday night. Rosen and Flood could not be reached for comment.

See more news from the Sun Journal.

Join the Conversation

130 Comments

  1. …but, but. but…Herr Lepage said it’s going to happen, so it must be true.  Once again, he’s caught in a lie.

  2. the feds are saying its illegal for the state of maine to control its budget. the obamacare law that is unconstitutional and will be struck down by the supreme court, does not allow the states to cut its medicaid costs. our reps in augusta need to get a pair and do their jobs, cut the budget.

     the  government is out of control, the state is required to have a balanced budget, the feds dont even know what a budget is. let the revolt begin.

    1. As I understand it, the federal government is merely saying that if Maine wants to continue getting any Medicaid funds, it must play by the program’s rules.

        1. The feds do fully fund the federal portion of Medicaid in Maine as in the other states.

          Lepage’s proposal loses all of that funding for Maine and puts thousands of Mainers out of work.

        2. No… it’s actually the other way around.  The feds do NOT need to give Maine any medicaid dollars nor do they need to waive federal laws or bend federal rules for the self-professed King of Maine, Paul LePage.     

          LePage is not above federal law and cannot bully the feds into giving him whatever he wants.  I hate to be the one to burst his bubble and yours but the fact of the matter is that LePage is required to follow federal law or suffer consequences just like anyone else.  One of those consequences is that if Maine breaks federal rules they risk losing all federal funds for Maine’s Medicaid program. Bullying won’t work this time!!!

          1. Not only do they risk losing all funding for Mainecare, they will lose it all if he pushes through the removal of 19 & 20yr olds with out the “unicorn” waiver.

          2. Well good these people most of them should be getting jobs providing for themselves.  They shouldn’t rely on us working folks to pay their way.  They have to learn reponsibility learn how to take care of themselves because if they don’t they are the ones to blame not anyone else.  These Programs are abused they are also a waste of taxpayer dollars they don’t work never have and break the bank of the state and its taxpayers.

          3. What is it about the unemployment rate that you don’t understand? Four or five people looking for work, for every available job means that people of all ages who are TRYING desperately to find work cannot find it.

            When you lose your job, you’ll thank God unemployment benefits exist. When you become disabled, or your child or grandchild becomes disabled, you’ll thank God for MaineCare and SSI, which suddenly won’t be a “waste of taxpayer dollars.”

    2. OK, again… the Feds are not saying it is illegal for Maine to control its budget. They are saying by accepting the “block grant” monies for welfare the Feds gave Maine, there are certain rules. Rules which were handed down by Ronald Reagan by the way (OMG I mentioned the Republican God, do you need some paper towels to clean yourself up with?) LePage’s cuts violate these rules, and therefore the Feds can deny monies if he implements them. The waiver is for states that can come up with systems that provide equal or better care than the system we have now. Whether or not “Obamacare” is a better system, IDK but the people who make the rules seem to think so. So if you want to come up with a system that is equal to or better than the medical care system we have and it is cheaper and still abides by the rules of Federal funding, please submit it and run for governor so we can have the “March of the Penguin” right out of Augusta.

    3. Since Obamacare greatly expands Medicaid coverage by 2014, guaranteed to bankrupt the states, the states should opt out of Medicaid altogether.

      Then the libs, with much gnashing of teeth and rending of garments, can wax nostalgic for the good old days when they had a chance to compromise in the face of reality but chose to cling to their fantasy that there existed marvelous Money Trees to pay for their utopian paradises.

      1. Great plan. Surely no one who considers themselves a republican will be on Mainecare anyway? Right? I always love it when people on the right cut off their nose to spite their face. Its almost as much fun as watching them all try to legislatively climb up into every uterus in the country and call that “less government”. Truly, it is a hoot.

        1. What’s with the lib fantasy that conservatives give a crap about your uteruses?  It’s more than creepy.

          1. You don’t think conservatives ‘give a crap about your uteruses’?  Then why won’t they leave  them alone?  All they care about is controlling women, starting wars and bleeding all of us so their cronies can get even richer. Give me a break!  And stay out of my uterus!!

  3. Sounds like money is drying up quickly, unfortunately if we keep the same practices up there won’t be any mainecare anymore and children won’t receive the care they need, these democrats need to start working on how to get the money to pay for this stuff if they think they can do better than LePage.

      1. Well I’m not interested in a which hunt here, someone needs to come up with something in this situation and I don’t see anyone with any ideas, so I think you should keep your unproductive bs comments to yourself.

        1. Your tired republican talking points are very unproductive, and we’ve heard them a million times.  Please keep it to yourself! 

          1. No, this is ridiculous, the state was running out of money during Baldacci’s administration for DHS and I hear no alternative ideas, do you have any? Seriously? I would honestly be happy if the dems had something but they don’t, my top concern is children not having access to care, not political diarrhea spewing out everywhere.

          2. revoke the tax breaks and raise taxes for wealthiest Mainers.

            Or you can keep shouting the same slogans over and over.

          3. Well, the middle class has become the working poor, if they are at all lucky … this is called “Trickle Down Economics” … lucky us!

          4. There really isn’t any economic model that can do anything about jobs exporting to other countries – that is where all the money is going.

          5.  But better tax policy can!  Like eliminating the fact there are actually tax benefits for offshoring.  If you can move things off shore and then not pay as much in taxes due to current tax policy why would anyone be surprised?  Change the policy to increase taxes on off shore profits and reduce them for US based production and see what happens. 

            The other issue is the role technology plays in the loss of manufacturing here.  Businesses that used to need 1,000 workers can now (depending upon industry) produce the same amount of product with 200 or fewer employees due to technology and efficiencies.  We have very high productivity in the US due to technology and automation such as robotics.

          6. You can’t just start taxing companies for offshore profits, that’s how you start trade wars. As far as robotics and automation, there is only so far that it can be effective. Most control systems are guaranteed to last five years, after that it’s a big chunk of money to upgrade, so unless you are raking in the dough you are going to have to struggle with an aging system, I see it all the time.

  4. LePage is constantly breaking the law.  Can’t wait for the Democrats to get control of the legislature so they can impeach him.

        1. Easy, OW.  My dog will get offended by your comment.  She puts out some good, honest, old-fashioned excrement, but  she’d never rent it out to govern the state of Maine.  LePew has that corner all covered (pun intended) w/his BS.

    1. me either…..Go Democrats…I will never vote for another Republican as long as I live….Not since Bush ruined to Country and Now LaPage is pulling Maine under water too.

      1. I made the same promise to myself when a bunch of philandering Republicans wasted the public’s time, money and energy to impeach the philandering Bill Clinton. This applies even to reasonable Republicans like Snowe, Collins and Romney. It’s much easier to vote against the GOP now that the yahoo faction has taken over the party.

    2. Get with reality he is going nowhere until January 2015 , hopefully he stays through January 2019.  Even Liberals in Augusta say they are going to have to deal  with him.  If the  Democrats get control back unless they have super majorities they will need Republican votes to get rid of him and it’s not happening.  All we will have now is gridlock and likely government shutdowns because hopefully LePage doesn’t sign their socialist legislations.

      1. Do you even know what a socialist is?  They are all about helping the working class?  Read something other than the newspapers and stop being scared of what the government of the cold war had you afraid of.

        1. The Liberals have never helped the working people in Maine nice try.  They have taken our hard earned money and redistributed it to lazy people who refuse to get off the couch or away from the computer to get a job.  That is why Maine is dead last economically and in the bottom of everything else.  While being in the top 6 in terms of high taxes, the top 3 in Welfare.  So if that is called helping the working class LOL you can have it.  Because of most of us call it legalized theft.  LePage and the Republicans have done more in 1 year to fix our problems than the Democrats last 36 years.

          1. Not all liberals are socialists, not all socialists are liberals.  Just like not all conservatives are bible thumping, racist, homophobes.

          2. NOT in the top six for income taxes (here’s a list of the top ones). Did you mis-read “top 16” somewhere?

            West Virginia (6.5% )Wisconsin (6.8%)Nebraska (6.8%)Maine (6.9%)Montana (6.9%)Delaware (7%)Arkansas (7% )North Carolina (7%)South Carolina (7%)Rhode Island (7.8%)Idaho (7.8%)Minnesota ( 7.9%)New York (7.9%)Hawaii (8.3%)Vermont (8.3%)D.C. ( 8.5%)Iowa (9%)California (9.6%)Oregon (10.8%)

            We’re 24th for property taxes, and 6th LOWEST for sales taxes…

            http://modernsurvivalblog.com/retreat-living/lowest-to-highest-taxes-by-state/

            Our welfare costs are high because we have an extremely high poverty rate. So why is LePage not creating JOBS???

  5. Feds say states must pay for something they won’t pay for.
    State says there is no money here to pay for your federal mandates.
    Welcome to Obamaland.

    Your kids get stuck with the bill for the party Obama wants to continue now in order to keep his base of voters fat and happy.

    1. Sorry, don’t get to blame Obama for this one. The “block grant” style of Federal funding of the welfare system with its rules predates Obama. States have to meet certain requirements in order to get the money, which again these rules predate Obama. There is nothing that requires the states to accept this money however, so we could just not take it.

      1. It appears that the MOE provisions of sections 1902(a)(74) and 1902(gg) of the Social Security Act were added by the Affordable Care Act (Obamacare).  So, Obama is to blame.

        From the letter:

        “You asked whether section 1115 of the Social Security Act (the Act) permits CMS to waive theMaintenance of Effort (MOE) provisions of sections 1902(a)(74) and 1902(gg) of the Act, as added by the Affordable Care Act, in order to achieve budget savings by reducing coverage for….”

        1. What a great example of an alternative, know why? Because it does not break the existing rules of coverage. Denying coverage to 18 and 19 year old people is against the rules. LePage can do anything he wants as far as coverage and cost savings as long as his system is equal to or better than the Feds. You can’t cut services, which LePage’s proposal does, you can cut costs provided the people get equal or better care then the current system provides. It is not a difficult concept to understand. Neither is the fact the state does not have to take any monies from the Feds, it can self support if it wishes, then it can make all the rules it wants.

    2. Ronald Reagan is the president who set up the current funding system.

      Nice try though. Enough people are so ignorant of history that you will gets lots of “likes” for your totally inaccurate post.

    3. Well put!  Pretty soon everyone’s money will run out and those of use who have been carrying this country on our back will be free!  Let’s see how the moonie’s fair then with nobody to support them!  I don’t mind taking care of people who actually deserve/need it, but we are going bust because of lazy and entitled people!

    4. Oh come on, the State does the same thing to Towns all the time. It’s called an “unfunded mandate” and is very common.

    5. Actually, the US got stuck paying for GW Bush’s “party.” He started two unfunded wars (which cost us trillions of dollars) with no glimmer of a way to end them, while CUTTING Federal revenues by giving tax breaks to his millionaire and billionaire buddies.

  6. It would seem that Mr LePage and Ms Mayhew should have submitted a request for waiver in November when they were preparing these proposed cuts. This is like a builder constructing a building that would require a zoning variance and then going in to apply for the variance when the owner is preparing to move in. How well would that work out ? 

    This administration’s whole attitude is captured in two statements from Ms Bennett and Mayhew. Ms Bennett  ” … legislative approval was designed to pressure …”.  Ms Mayhew  ” … the administration was prepared to fight … “. The whole mentality here comes off as always being confrontational. I learned a long time ago that an ounce of sugar got you a lot more honey than an ounce of vinegar.

    Feds stand — waivers will not be given as a method to balance the budget. Ms Mayhew ” We will work closely with our delegation to make the necessary case to waive the MOE provision to balance our budget … ” .  Anyone want to take odds on this ?

    The rules of the game are the rules of the game. To come out ahead you have to play the game and you have to play by the rules.    

  7. Maybe if he get’s a chance to yell at the Feds and wave his hands wildly in the air they will become frightened enough to allow him to cut healthcare for the poor, mentally/physically ill, and elderly. Nope, I don’t see that happening anytime soon but I’m sure Paul will respond as noted anyways. He’s kind of a one trick pony.

    1. I love the “one trick pony” comment.  I am just waiting for the next election and praying we can get rid of this nut!

          1. No, he can’t-he’s a republican and everyone knows they thrive on distraction.  Besides, oldboy3,we have to cut him some slack:  like Geo. the boxer, he’s probably punch drunk.

          2. Why the Emperor Nobama created this mess with his Stimulus Programs which mandated we have to keep these programs at these levels .   Even though with no more Stimulus Money coming in now we have a huge shortfall from it.  They either better start forking over more money if they permanently want these folks on these handouts. If not let the state do it’s job and start cutting everyone off of these programs.

          3. I love how you guys jump to blame all of the Penguins problems on the previous administration but refuse to accept how badly the previous Presidential administration left the state of the union for Obama.

    2. It can’t be him that’s wrong! It’s everyone else, just ask him. Here comes temper tantrum   # 374.

  8. So, proposed cuts to Medicaid / Welfare cannot be made…..time to balance the budget and cut other services……
    1) Cut the DOT budget…..park snowplows…
    stop any and all improvements to roads, bridges, infra-structure
    2) Cut Public Safety……reduce the State Police, Fire Marshalls and other necessary and ancillary
    staff……
    3) Cut IF&W…..No Warden services or enforcement of applicable associated laws….no more
    search and rescue…..etc….
    4) Cut all Marine Resources….
    5) Cut Dept. of Corrections…..
    6) Cut monies to Psych facilities and the Baxter School…..
    7) Cut the Dept. of Defense, Veterans & Emergency Management…..

    Could certainly continue to list areas of state budgeting where cuts should / can be made, but would wager a bet, if I were a betting individual, that if any of the above are drastically affected due to the funding of the welfare system, people would be begging the state to address the budgeting of Medicaid with a different mind-set…..

    1. The only cut that you didn’t mention is the one that the Governor has threatened…cut State aid to public education which is now at about 43%.  What that would do is shift the financial burden to the individual districts’ taxpayers(i.e. increase your taxes and mine).

      1. There are many areas where eventual cuts will need to be made in addition to those listed, and agreed that if education is affected the taxpayer will again bear this burden, as well as our youth and young people in all school systems….

    2. Your temper
      tantrums make me laugh!

      A more
      realistic scenario is the Govnah and his republican cohorts would be tarred and
      feathered, then run out of the state on a rail : )

    3. The shortfall is about 3% of the budget. Cutting a small amount everywhere would balance the budget.

      Tens of millions can be saved with monthly state shutdown days. Those had only  minor impact sover the past few years.

      Lepage just doesn’t have the intelligence or leadership to figure this out.

      1. Agreed…..so where are the proposals for cuts across board rather than just blasting the admin for this focus on welfare??

      2. I agree, cut about 420$ from each person 275,000 on welfare and the defecit goes away, about the cost of a cup of coffee per day for everyone on welfare.  Is that too much to ask?

    4. A few things wrong with your choices.

      1. Let more people be killed because of letting the snow stay on teh roads and our roads and bridges collapse and drive out the remaining businesses in Maine.  Good thinking.

      2. Let more people die from lack of public safety.  Good thinking.

      3. Let people die and our nateral resources be stolen by corporations and criminals.  Good thinking.

      4. See reason 3.

      5. Let your wife and daughters be raped and you killed and all your stuff stolen.  Good thinking.

      6. Abandon people in need.  Good thinking.

      7. These are federal programs.  Stupid thinking.

      1. I never indicated that any choices for cutting fundings are better than another…..my thoughts, that you seem to know and suggest are “stupid”, suggest that if other cuts are made due to budgeting needs and some of the areas mentioned actually do affect people in the ways you describe, those crying the most over the Gov’s proposed cuts to the welfare system will be revisiting their opposition and see the crisis a little more clearly….good thinking, huh…..and btw, the Dept of DVEM is an active part of Maine’s Governance…

        1. The Department of DVEM is funded thru the FEDERAL DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE by a block grant.

          And cutting Medicare will kill people whether you want to admit it or not.  I, for one, do not think getting $10 or $15 dollars more a month is worth people dying but you apparently do. 

          1. Oh my, there you go doing my thinking again, and wrongly so……MAINE’S DEVM has a budget (out of the state’s general funds) of approx. $15.8 million along with funds provided from the Federal Gov (which btw comes from the taxpayer) and the Commissioner is a member of the Governor’s Cabinet…..if you believe the administration of this office is not supported locally and federally by the taxpayer, well then so be it……

        2. I have a suggestion for reducing the funding gap of DHHS.  Roll back the tax cuts that LePage put thru.  According to LePage those tax cuts resulted in a savings to Maine taxpayers of $200 million which is close to the shortfall to DHHS.

          I did tax returns for 2010 and 2011 using 2010 US Census data for median wage for a single male and a single female.  I used the filing status of single because that is the highest tax bracket.  The median income for a male was $32,372 and for a female was $24,251 with both working fulltime.

          I used the 2010 ME 1040EZ and the 2011 ME 1040EZ using a personal exemption of $5800 to determine the amount of tax owed at the end of the year.

          A single male would have paid $1591 in tax for 2010 and $1584 in tax for 2011, a difference of $6 for the year.

          A single female would have paid $995 in tax for 2010 and $999 in tax for 2011, a difference of $4 for the year.

      2. Well you left out one other.  Instead of careing for our elderly and disabled they should not be fed if they can’t feed themselves, nor be given fluids if they can’t not drink,  in short we should just let the die becuse we cant afford to feed them…  (WE HAVE TO FUND MAINECARE JUST LIKE WE HAVE TO PAY FOR ANY OTHER SERVICES, BECAUSE THAT WHAT IT MEANS TO LIVE IN A SOCIETY).

      3.  It really comes down to the fact that we have bought into the “lower taxes” mantra of the tea party.  The fact is that we need to fund government because we all have services we want.  It’s just which services are important to you.  You may want your street paved, and someone else might want to have medical care for their diabetes.  If you want both you have to pay for both somehow.  And it isn’t by cutting taxes!  The fact that we are in the budget mess today is one thing, but when the governor said in his state of the state address that he was going to be asking for more tax cuts I almost puked!

      1. There are no millionaires and billionaires left in maine save the Donald,  Susman AKA Mr Chellie Pingreedy and his Paloma Partners hedge fund, but the Donald has his money hidden in the Bahamas and Swiss accounts so he and CHellie can swindle Maine and not pay their fair share!

  9. Sure lets tell big brother instead of trying to work out a compromise. Let’s continue to hemorrhage money. As he said how can we offer free services and then not have the funds to pay for them?  I do not agree with all he said, but I do believe  in this statement. We can not exist like this forever

    1. How come initiating huge expenses (two wars costing trillions of dollars) and not having the funds to pay for them (tax breaks for millionaires) was a great idea (per Republicans) when GW Bush was doing it?

  10. I don’t understand why there’s not more about the fact that LePage’s administration made up this budget for DHHS and wildly under-budgeted for it.  Perhaps they should have been a little better at estimating the costs when they were creating the budget rather than use a very low number just to be able to go over budget and then demand cuts.  How he can pass tax cuts and implement an unrealistically low DHHS budget and then scream that the sky is falling when they’re way over budget and demand cuts to services just doesn’t pass the straight face test.

    1. Yes, the shortfall is nearly 100% caused by the incompetence or dishonesty of the Lepage administration because they either could not, or intentionally d=id not, produce a correct budget.

      Even his own DHHS Commissioner finally had to admit that in her public testimony to the legislature.

      1. Really then when Democrats had shortfalls  for the last 36 years when they had control of things were they dishonest as well because of them not producing a correct budget.  Pot calling kettle black here but to keep attacking LePage is unfair.  When the mess this state is in was done by Democrat Legislature and by Democrat & Democrat-Independent Governors.  Democrats aren’t saints like all of their supporters on here think they are because they were spending money for nearly 40 years  like it was monopoly money.  They ram their social agenda, their failed economic policies and their restrictive nanny state upon us.  They also abused power for years as we have seen with the MTA, MSHA , Efficency Maine and its programs.  Also with Referendums on TABOR, Tax Reform, Casinos etc..

        1. It’s the Koch Brothers and their puppet, LePage, who are trying to ram their polices down our throats. Tax breaks for millionaires, and try to demonize poor and disabled and elderly people so we’ll slash social services.

    2. It’s easy to create a fake balanced budget with tax cuts  –  you just use unrealistically low numbers in your budget for spending and then include the tax cut in there and say it’s a balanced budget.

      1. I wonder why those tax cuts aren’t generating gobs of additional revenue, wasn’t that what we were promised by the Lepage and the tea baggers.

    3. Crunching some rough numbers, it seems the budget shortfall in DHHS over the biennium is about 8% of the DHHS total budget. An 8% miscalculation is not that far off–most of us don’t do as well on our home budgets. It certainly isn’t wildly underbudgeted. MaineCare expenses are nearly impossible to pin down exactly. Baldacci has had to come back with supplemental budgets as well–because you create a budget to cover two years, but there are always expenses that come in over budget. Le Page started his administration last year with having to draft a supplemental budget to make up for the “under-budgeting” done by Baldacci.
      As for the tax cuts, they have not taken effect yet–they are not partof the current shortfall.
      Finally, a governor submits a budget, but it has to be passed by the legislature. This current budget was passed with the 2/3 majority in the state legislature. Apparently the vast majority of our representatives thought it was a properly funded budget.

      1. But they passes it on incorrect figures for DHHS. They underprojected on purpose to create a crisis. this was LePage’s goal from the beginning.

        1. And where is the evidence that this is the case? Are you privy to LePage’s inner circle? Wait! Are you a whistleblower??? OMG

          1. You’d be surprised what I’m privy to. Probably a lot more than you are. Also, I believe Mary Mayhew has also admitted that DHHS was underbudgeted last spring which was the reason for the initial $91 million shortfall. They has used some one time monies as ongoing.

      2. 8% is a huge amount of money.  A 8% miscalculation in a budget that is so big as DHHS is inexcusable.  What this administration did not do is consider the fact that the increased money from the federal government was going to end. 

        1. Was Baldacii one year JUne 2009 telling us we had a 500 million $ surplus and then in 8 months it evaporated and we had a 400 million $ deficit. 

          Reality is we have to wean ourselves off all these stupid Federal Programs, because at some point they are going away too, better to kick the habit now.

  11. LePage reminds me of the Tazmanian Devil cartoons.  He’s all big and scary until he slips on a banana peel that Bugs Bunny (the Feds)  put in his path.

  12. Is it a surprise to anyone that the feds won’t allow him to cut health care as he wished to do? Talk about putting the cart before the horse.

  13. Time for Maine’s two useless senators to step in and twist some federal mammaries until they see things Paul’s way.

  14. ‘Mayhew, in a written statement, emphasized that DHHS had not submitted a waiver request to Secretary Sebelius. However, she said, the administration was “prepared to fight and take our case to Washington.” ‘

    Thank you, Ms. Mayhew, for clarifying just how our tax dollars will be wasted in this wild goose chase/slight of hand/smoke & mirrors dream scene that you all have going. How many of you will waste your time (and our tax dollars) on an effort that runs at cross-purposes to the goal of Medicaid, which is “to provide high-quality health care coverage to needy individuals whose income and resources are insufficient to meet the costs of necessary medical services.”  

    In his efforts (largely ineffective) to be the all-conquering hero and problem solver, LePage has lost sight of the big picture – if he ever had sight of it. Do your homework folks. If you’re going to suggest a huge change, at least find out if it’s a viable option and spend some time looking at the ultimate price we will pay.  So many of LePage’s ideas are turning out to be useless. If he would really look at his proposals and follow them all the way through before deeming them worth the time, effort and lip service he has been giving to them, then his time in office would be much more effective for everyone. If that could happen then people like me, who really don’t care whether he’s a democrat or a republican or an independent as long as he is intelligent and effective, would not be shaking our heads every time something new comes out – even before we hear what it is.  

     

    1. He’s doing exactly what the Koch Bros tell him to do.  These Tea Partiers must be voted out of office next election cycle, for the betterment of our country.  

  15. How is Lepage going to get around this one? Looks like there is trouble with his “grand” plan AGAIN!

    1. Frank, just so you know, if he does just “keep going” and removed 19 & 20yrs olds from Mainecare, without this waiver, the state would lose ALL of its federal funding for Mainecare. So. Be careful what you wish for.

  16. because ..WE MUST GIVE AWAY OUR MONEY TO ANYONE THATS ASKS FOR IT.. according to the liberals and the dems.. We will just give it away .. even if the budget is not balanced..We must give it to these people.. because thats the way of the socialist.. Some of us will work.. and the rest will just get everything for free.. thats  where we are..  Even if you shouldnt be getting benefits .. It dosnt matter.. If we start disqualifying people.. its because we have no compassion … and we hate the poor.. and that way the lifestyle that have so many have become accustom too continues with out and danger.. and thats whats most important.. that the checks  go out on the first..  so everyone can go to the mailbox and get paid.. Take Lepage out so they  dont have to think about the horror of actually going to find a job.. get in the Liberal Democrat and open that damed state check book up again.. Then the world will be correct again.. 

    1. You sound like a broken record, demonize the poor and sick.  I have no doubt there are people who milk the system but that does not mean everybody is milking it.  I have no problem weeding out those who are milking the system but to paint everybody as the same is a big mistake, which is what the governor seems to be doing. 
      It would be nice if some people put a little thought into their post rather than ranting like the polititians do against either the rich or the poor, believe me there are happy mediums which none of them seem to be able to find.

  17. If you want a real description,of the Governor of Maine here it is. First he is a Coward, a Bully,and a would be Dictator. 63  percent of the people can’t be all wrong

  18. If the feds want to mandate the states cover all these people, then the feds should foot the entire bill for them. Otherwise Back Off! States’ rights, all the way.

    1. So you recommend not taking any Federal dollars? You can’t take the money and dictate how it will bs spent. This is one of the ways the Feds prevent State fraud, like Maine’s Service Provider tax where MaineCare dollars are charged a 5 Percent tax that goes to the State, and then the provider ges the 5 percent back by billing MaineCare for it. This budget trick generates millions tha will also be gone when we give up Federal dollars. Yor path would detroy this State.

      1.  That is why you dont take the money in the first place.  All the gimmicks from the FEds come with strings attached and actually cost you more money.
        The sad part is the state gets these freebies(with all the strings attached), promise people on these new programs and trap them into a life of dependancy.  Time to cut the cord, tell the Feds to shove it, and move one.

        1. And get rid of all the jobs the Federal money pays for?  What a great idea (dripping sarcasm). Throw more Mainers out of work, then start saying they’re lazy good-for-nothings and make sure they don’t get unemployment benefits or MaineCare.

  19. I haven’t understood from the get-go why the governor and Mayhew thought they were going to obtain this waiver.  Granting these waivers to the states is essentially admission by the Obama administration that his “signature” legislation will bankrupt the states.  Furthermore, if HHS Secretary Kathleen Sebelius grants the waiver to one state she’ll be forced to grant waivers to all 50 states.  I don’t know what the answer is but this one just ain’t gonna fly!

  20. LePage even tries to make the cut’s and he’s looking at Federal court acton. Never have I ever seen someone try so hard to back into, butt first, a buzz saw blade so carefully. Every step he takes in his little grab for power is one more step into either a recall (and yes it is being explored), an impeachment or adding to the next campaign prep. Anyway you look at it, LePage is doing a bang up job for the next inevitable election cycle. He’s defining the issues and clearing out all of the dead wood. More importantly, to his credit, he’s going to make the political party issue VERY CLEAR. There will be no possible way anyone in Maine is going to be sitting on any fence the next time around.

    But there is one bright shining moment in all of this, when you come to think about it. Every time LePage makes a squawk about the Mainecare financing, he makes the arguement for Public Option just ‘that much’ stronger. At the rate he’s going, Maine may find itself the Test State for it by his infamous May 1 deadline. And some people say LePage doesn’t look out for his constituent’s.

Leave a comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *