KATHRYN OLMSTEAD

Aroostook farmer the face of organic growers’ fight against Monsanto

Jim Gerritsen of Bridgewater made his first trip to New York City to address the Dec. 4 “Farmers’ March” to Zuccotti Park organized by the Food Justice Committee of the Occupy Wall Street movement.
Photo courtesy Jim Gerritsen
Jim Gerritsen of Bridgewater made his first trip to New York City to address the Dec. 4 “Farmers’ March” to Zuccotti Park organized by the Food Justice Committee of the Occupy Wall Street movement.
Posted Dec. 08, 2011, at 1:05 p.m.
Print this   E-mail this    Facebook this   Tweet this     

I have wanted to catch up with Bridgewater organic farmer Jim Gerritsen ever since he was named in October to the 2011 list of 25 visionaries who are changing the world by the national magazine Utne Reader. When I finally succeeded last weekend, he was on his way to New York City to give a speech and participate in the Dec. 4 rally and “Farmers’ March” to Zuccotti Park organized by the Food Justice Committee of the Occupy Wall Street movement.

Gerritsen, 56, who with his wife, Megan, and their family has operated Wood Prairie Farm in Bridgewater since 1976, is on a mission that has put him in the national — and international — spotlight. As president of Organic Seed Growers and Trade Association, the trade organization for the organic seed industry, he is the lead plaintiff in a suit to protect growers and consumers of organic foods.

The defendant is Monsanto Corp., world leader in production of genetically modified organisms, or GMOs, intended to increase yields of herbicide-resistant crops — crops that can withstand sprays such as Roundup that kill the weeds around them. Airborne or insect-borne pollen from these transgenic, or gene-spliced, crops can do irrevocable damage to organic seed crops. But loss of crops is only the beginning.

“Farmers lose not only the value of the organic crop, but we are also open to patent infringement lawsuits,” Gerritsen said “Monsanto can contend that the (organic) farm is in possession of a (patented) Monsanto product.”

To date, Monsanto has sued 90 American farmers for patent infringement, receiving an estimated $15 million for judgments in its favor, according to the Center for Food Safety. Many cases have been settled out of court with farmers bound to confidentiality. Monsanto dominates the sale of seed stocks worldwide, especially corn, soybeans and cotton, and sends private investigators to farms suspected of replanting saved seed.

Hence, the legal action, OSGATA v. Monsanto, has captured the attention of international media, but mostly the alternative press in the United States — until Monday, that is, when Gerritsen’s role in Sunday’s Farmers’ March was reported in the New York Times under the headline: “A Maine Farmer Speaks to Wall Street.”

Gerritsen heads OSGATA, based in Montrose, Colo., which is leading 83 plaintiffs in the case against Monsanto. The individual farmers, seed companies and agricultural organizations that have signed onto the case represent about 300,000 members nationwide.

“Monsanto is trying to achieve seed control based on aggressive assertion of patent infringement,” Gerritsen said, explaining that the farmers’ lawsuit has two goals: to protect organic farmers against patent infringement lawsuits and to challenge the validity of patents issued to Monsanto.

“Organic farming is predicated on the concept of crops free of GMO content,” he said, noting the irony of a suit against a farmer by the company that has destroyed that farmer’s crop.

“If organic seed is contaminated, there is no way to grow nongenetically modified crops,” he said. “The outcome will be either seed controlled directly by Monsanto or contaminated by Monsanto.”

If the 83 plaintiffs led by OSGATA are successful, Monsanto would be forced by the court not to sue farmers whose crops are contaminated by the corporation’s product. When lawyers for the farm groups — working on a pro bono basis — requested such a guarantee, Monsanto refused.

“They are reserving the option to go after those farmers,” Gerritsen said, adding that Monsanto filed a motion to dismiss the case last July. “We need to get the court to protect farmers from invasion, trespassing and patent infringement. We are anxious to get into court.”

If the plaintiffs achieve their second goal, the court will agree that the U.S. Patent Office erred in granting Monsanto patents for crops that do not fulfill the “social utility” standard, which requires that a new invention will result in some “social good.”

Gerritsen faults not only the U.S. Patent Office, but also the U.S. Food and Drug Administration, which accepted Monsanto’s claim that GMO products are “substantially equivalent” to traditional seed and need not be labeled. Thus, consumers can’t know what foods have been grown using GMO technology.

“They can’t have it both ways,” he said, questioning the awards of patents for products because they are new, which then evade labeling because they are not new.

“President Obama promised mandatory labeling of genetically modified products and we must hold him to that,” Gerritsen said, acknowledging a possible challenge: The current deputy commissioner of the FDA, which regulates labeling, Michael R. Taylor, is a former vice president of Monsanto.

Gerritsen said the plaintiffs hope the case will go to trial by late winter or early spring. At this point, they are still awaiting a ruling on the motion to dismiss.

“Once we win the case, one can imagine Monsanto will want to appeal,” he said, predicting a process that could take three to five years and end up in the Supreme Court, where they might face another challenge: Justice Clarence Thomas served as an attorney for Monsanto from 1976-1979 and has failed to recuse himself from other cases involving the corporation.

Meanwhile, Gerritsen is encouraged by the effectiveness of the Occupy Wall Street movement in putting a spotlight on inequity. “It is the new conscience of America,” he said. That’s why he made his first trip to New York City to let the Occupy protesters know that farmers are behind them.

“I have not spoken to one farmer who doesn’t understand the message of Occupy Wall Street,” he told New York Times reporter Julia Moskin. “We have fifth- and sixth-generation farmers up where I live being pushed out of business, when all they want to do is grow good food. And if it goes on like this, all we’re going to have to eat in this country is unregulated, imported, genetically modified produce. That’s not a healthy food system.”

For more information, visit fooddemocracynow.org, pubpat.org, osgata.org, foodintegritynow.org, woodprairiefarm.com and www.i-sis.org.uk/MonsantovsFarmers.

Kathryn Olmstead is a former University of Maine associate dean and associate professor of journalism living in Aroostook County, where she publishes the quarterly magazine Echoes. Her column appears in this space every other Friday. She can be reached at kathryn.olmstead@umit.maine.edu or P.O. Box 626, Caribou 04736.

Similar articles:

Marketplace News

Marketplace

Guidelines for posting on bangordailynews.com

The Bangor Daily News encourages comments about stories, but you must follow our terms of service.

In brief:

  1. Keep it civil and stay on topic
  2. No vulgarity, racial slurs, name-calling or personal attacks.
  3. People who harass others or joke about tragedies will be blocked.

The primary rule here is pretty simple: Treat others with the same respect you'd want for yourself. Here are some guidelines (see more):

  • Anonymous

    It is fundamentally wrong to not allow farmers to save seed for replanting.

  • acadiawoods

    We should all be supporting Gerritsen in his fight because it is a fight for us.

  • hasacluemaine

    This is an important issue. Diverse seed stock is important to everyone. I might remind folks of the results of the Irish potato famine of the 19th Century. I would encourage the gentleman not to hook his wagon to the occupy loons, but seek a diverse constituency. This issue is as important to the most conservative of us, to the most liberal. It should not be a partisan issue.

  • Anonymous

    Though I do not agree that organic farming is the only way to go, I have never been supportive of corporate greed and bullying.  In that sense it seems that Monsanto is following the American corporate formula for success.  I would remind those about to skewer Monsanto that pretty much every nationally and internationally successful corporation operates the same way including Apple, IBM, Microsoft, the pharmaceutical companies, and most others.  Monsanto makes computer chips too and probably is resident in all the computers being used by the people who will complain here.  Also one might note that many more people around the world would be starving to death without the advantage of genetically modified crops that survive local environments well enough to feed so many of the  worlds hungry.  So yes, companies such as Monsanto, Apple and Pfizer are creeps for throwing their weight around however they do good things also.

    OK Nancy, lets hear the tirade.

  • Anonymous

    Occupy the Bootfoot Road!!!

  • Anonymous

    Hey OBAMA , where you at ??
    Can you help a brother out?
    Some big bullies are tormenting a humble farmer  and his family.

    Whats that you say, OBAMA ?
    How much did the farmer contribute to your campaign ??
    Oh !! OK  !! Never mind. I get it.
    You are awfully busy.
    Golf , Luaus and staying scarce.
    Sorry to bother you.

  • Anonymous

    Not only that but it is fundamentally wrong that the courts award Monsanto MILLIONS of dollars because they contaminate the crops of others!!!! Down the rabbit hole we have gone….

  • Guest

    Indeed!

    It seems monsanto has a lot of ex employees conveniently filling roles in the FDA along with the judicial system. Amazing.

  • Guest

    You couldn’t be more naive regarding monsanto.

    Do you realize how many ex monsanto employees fill govt roles? Especially in the FDA !!!!

    It’s not about ” greed and bullying” it’s about complete control of the food supply and essentially poisoning people with GMO foods. Yes, there are success stories with some GMO seeds. But there simply isn’t a reason to manipulate most of the seeds they sell. It’s a business remember. They have the ability to sue if a monsanto seed blows into a farmers land who isn’t using the monsanto seed but because it was blown over to his land he is guilty!!?? What? Are you kidding me?? Please… But the point is there is no need for it! You’re being sold a bill of goods! You don’t think organic farming is the way to go? Uh, I don’t really see a healthy alliterative? Agriculture has been in practice for thousands of years
    . There is no need for pesticides and seeds that contain poison. Not to mention that the only reason they ever got into the agriculture game was because they had left over chemicals
    from making bombs in ww ii!

    Your simplification of this issue demonstrates a lack of true knowledge about this company, this industry, and how they are killing the family farmer in america. It is wrong. And the federal govt is complicit.

  • Guest

    This disgust me. We cannot let our govt get away with this!

    What is going on!? Where is the press in regards to these issues?
    What could possibly be more important than the food we eat?
    They would sooner import Chinese vegetables than grow them here!

    They have already succeeded in essentially killing the most fertile soils in the world by planting
    single crops with no rotation the mid west. All about corn. Corn syrup, etc. Corn. Corn and more corn till they shove it down our overweight pathetic diabetic throats!

  • Guest

    There is a petition on facebook to demand that the US label gmo foods.

    For some reason I can not copy the link. Try googling – just label it take action

  • Steve Anderson

    “I have not spoken to one farmer who doesn’t understand the message of Occupy Wall Street.”
    I guess that makes farmers a bunch of lazy hippies, right, OWS haters?

  • Anonymous

    Monsanto is itching for a lawsuit that lays them out flat. You guys aren’t looking at this from the right perspective. Monsanto genetically modified these plants and pushed them through the FDA. Monsanto never did any research whatsoever into what happens if the genetically modified plants breed with unmodified breeds. They’re liable for any and all damages that come from unimaginable consequences of halfbreed plants bugs can’t eat and poisons can’t kill. If a plant is sprayed with a poison that would normally kill the unmodified plant, does that mean we eat the poison in pretty tasteless packages. I’ll sit down now.

  • Anonymous

    Understanding and agreeing are two different things bud

  • Anonymous

    How right you are!  Maine’s behind you, Mr. Gerritsen!!  As hopefully will be the rest of the nation.   Keep this in the headlines, so more people will hear about it & support  OSGATA. 

  • Anonymous

    Wait a minute…No comment from Monsanto?  Was the company questioned for this article?  This is entirely one sided and more of an editorial. 

  • Anonymous

    I think you are missing my position completely and deliberately misrepresenting what I said to justify running your mouth.

  • Anonymous

    The ‘occupy’ folks are a fringe of misdirected infants compared to the secretive Monsanto clan.  More investigative reporting needs to shed light on just what Monsanto is doing as they seem to be in a viable position to hold the world hostage to their monopoly of seed supply. The genie is out of the GMO bottle and needs to be supervised before everything downwind of it is corrupted.

  • Anonymous

    Monsanto gets what they pay for -special rights which infringe upon the rights of farmers. If organic farmers had a few billion dollars to throw around, they would get special rights too. Pathetic.

  • Anonymous

    Gerritsen is well known and respected in Maine. I hope he can get the support from all who want to grow and eat good food. Monsanto is very rich and will fight to keep their hold on the food system. We must support the true organic movement.

  • Anonymous

    An obvious conflict of interest in reference to Taylor. Disgusting and corupt in reference to Monsanto!! Sooo if I think my neighbor has the same grass that I have …….I can sue him for “using” MY grass seed

  • Anonymous

    Gerritsen of Wood Prairie Farm in Maine is an organic farmer standing up for our food security, for good wholesome food. Monsanto is a whily multinational, not interested in feeding people, but in making gazillions of dollars and controlling world seed production and chemo-agriculture. We all must support OSGATA in their suit against Monsanto.

  • Anonymous

    I hope things go in favor of the farmers, the genetically modified crops are not as good as the organic crops.  You may get bigger product out of today’s crop but nutritionally they are not always on par or superior than the organic un-modified crop.  It is also ridiculous that farmers that choose to grow monsanto seeds are only allowed to use them for X amount of time and can’t use anything left over or gathered.  When you buy a product like a plant any progeny from that crop should not be subject to the companies control.  

  • Anonymous

    They don’t need it. Their lobbiests go directly to the source–and the posters above are correct, there are many many documented instances of the same person working 5-7 years for Monsantos, then the FDA, and then back at Monsantos. And so on.

    See the film, “The Future of Food,” if you want to learn more/be supremely terrified. I haven’t seen “King Corn” but it has the same message (and there’s a follow up film about fertilizer use in the mid west on industrial farms and its effects on the southern watersheds, all the way to the Gulf of Mexico).

  • Anonymous

    Here’s a way we can slash the American budget–stop subsidizing Monsantos to produce genetically modified corn/industrial style monoculture agriculture that is unsustainable and environmentally disruptive. Sure, all those corn-based foods would all of a sudden reflect their true costs (the oil that it takes to produce and distribute fertilizers and pesticides) but I, personally, am willing to live without high fructose corn syrup. Then, in comparison, the cost of organic, locally grown foods will seem more reasonable to Americans who have been sucking down subsidized corn products for the last 50 years.

    A lovely bluegrass-punk band called Casa de Chihuahua has an illuminating song called, “Livin’ on the Corn” that I am sure you can all get for free online, for any of you that want to revel in digust for Monsantos.

  • Anonymous

    If you need to find out about Monsanto’s point of view just Google it. We have had unbalanced reporting on the side of the corporations for years. To hell with hearing from Monsanto in this article. It speaks the truth and we don’t need to hear more of Monsanto’s lies. Their point of view is in the article and it is terrifying science fiction and fascistic. No home grown seeds allowed? Small organic farmers going broke because they are contaminating Monsanto and have to fight them in court? Are you kidding me?!

  • http://twitter.com/jjdoublej Jim R Johnson

    Farmers have a choice to buy non gmo or gmo.  If they buy GMO they know ahead of time, and agree to not save the seed by signing a legal document.

  • http://twitter.com/jjdoublej Jim R Johnson

    It is a fact that money has collected money as settlements….all of which is donated to charity.

  • http://twitter.com/jjdoublej Jim R Johnson

    ah…you’re the one that is lacking true knowledge and fact.  You should read up on Monsanto and GM seeds and get the truth about them before you make silly accusations.

  • http://twitter.com/jjdoublej Jim R Johnson

    Nice…..you just dont want the true facts….amazing.

  • http://twitter.com/jjdoublej Jim R Johnson

    Sorry Kired, it has been proven that organic crops are not any better nutritionally than GM or non-organic.  The organics have successfully sold you the idea it is to get you to pay more for it.

  • http://twitter.com/jjdoublej Jim R Johnson

    As i am sure BASF, Bayer, Syngenta, Pioneer, Dupont and all the other chemical and seed companies do.  It is Agriculture after all

  • Anonymous

    My mistake I meant per weight. You may be paying for a bigger tomato but more often than not a tomato of an heirloom variety has more nutrition per weight, as the plant is not wasting energy to put into mass it stores the nutrients instead. 

  • http://twitter.com/jjdoublej Jim R Johnson

    it is a ridiculuous notion and an insult to Clarence Thomas that he would be swayed to make decisions because he worked for Monsanto 30+ years ago for a very short time.  Really?  That is a very thin and stupid argument.

  • Anonymous

    But when they are paid per weight of their crop which is going to help them keep the farm and compete in the market.  

  • Anonymous

    Honestly I am quite well informed about Monsanto.  You, just as anyonebutthem, is bent on totally vilifying Monsanto.  I, unlike you or anyonebut…., will admit that Monsanto has a great many bad qualities in how they run their corporation.  However unlike you two I recognize that they have also done good.  This issue of controversy regarding how best to solve a problem could be  said about the history of our country and the great people who have been behind the social, economic, medical, and technical advances that our country has contributed to mankind.  Yes, some of it isn’t very nice.  Some is outright deplorable!  And yet these same companies, regardless of their reason for doing what they do, end up contributing to the well being of mankind.  You, and people like anyonebutthem, need to learn to give credit where it is due, and seek change where it is appropriate.  Be an adult and learn to resolve the difference between the attitude of total “they suck, lets stop them” with perhaps a willingness to understand their goals, your goals, and what is best for all, to work in harmony.  I say this with experience: it is best to find a common goal and work from there.  In the end we will all profit from the wisdom of those who are seeking a sustainable and workable solution.

     Good luck.  You can do it!

  • Anonymous

    Honestly I am quite well informed about Monsanto.  You, just as anyonebutthem, is bent on totally vilifying Monsanto.  I, unlike you or anyonebut…., will admit that Monsanto has a great many bad qualities in how they run their corporation.  However unlike you two I recognize that they have also done good.  This issue of controversy regarding how best to solve a problem could be  said about the history of our country and the great people who have been behind the social, economic, medical, and technical advances that our country has contributed to mankind.  Yes, some of it isn’t very nice.  Some is outright deplorable!  And yet these same companies, regardless of their reason for doing what they do, end up contributing to the well being of mankind.  You, and people like anyonebutthem, need to learn to give credit where it is due, and seek change where it is appropriate.  Be an adult and learn to resolve the difference between the attitude of total “they suck, lets stop them” with perhaps a willingness to understand their goals, your goals, and what is best for all, to work in harmony.  I say this with experience: it is best to find a common goal and work from there.  In the end we will all profit from the wisdom of those who are seeking a sustainable and workable solution.

     Good luck.  You can do it!

  • Anonymous

    Honestly I am quite well informed about Monsanto.  You, just as anyonebutthem, is bent on totally vilifying Monsanto.  I, unlike you or anyonebut…., will admit that Monsanto has a great many bad qualities in how they run their corporation.  However unlike you two I recognize that they have also done good.  This issue of controversy regarding how best to solve a problem could be  said about the history of our country and the great people who have been behind the social, economic, medical, and technical advances that our country has contributed to mankind.  Yes, some of it isn’t very nice.  Some is outright deplorable!  And yet these same companies, regardless of their reason for doing what they do, end up contributing to the well being of mankind.  You, and people like anyonebutthem, need to learn to give credit where it is due, and seek change where it is appropriate.  Be an adult and learn to resolve the difference between the attitude of total “they aren’t nice, lets stop them” with perhaps a willingness to understand their goals, your goals, and what is best for all, to work in harmony.  I say this with experience: it is best to find a common goal and work from there.  In the end we will all profit from the wisdom of those who are seeking a sustainable and workable solution.

     Good luck.  You can do it!

ADVERTISEMENT | Grow your business

Marketplace Coupons

ADVERTISEMENT | Grow your business