Postal Service on verge of financial collapse

Sen. Susan Collins, R-Maine, with Sen. Joseph Lieberman, I-Conn.
J. Scott Applewhite | AP
Sen. Susan Collins, R-Maine, with Sen. Joseph Lieberman, I-Conn.
Posted Sept. 06, 2011, at 6:09 p.m.
Last modified Sept. 07, 2011, at 5:43 a.m.
Print this   E-mail this    Facebook this   Tweet this     

WASHINGTON — The U.S. Postal Service is on the verge of financial collapse and should eliminate Saturday delivery, close thousands of local post offices, restructure its health plan and lay off 120,000 workers to survive, according to Postmaster General Patrick Donahoe.

Donahoe asked lawmakers to allow him to make “radical” changes to the centuries-old institution so it could avoid defaulting on its obligations. At a Senate hearing Tuesday, he said the Postal Service is all but certain to miss a $5.5 billion payment to its retiree health fund due at the end of the month. And that only begins the trouble, he said, warning that the postal system is heading toward a $10 billion net loss this fiscal year and is near its borrowing limit.

With operating cash running out quickly, trucks, mail processing centers and mail delivery could come to a halt by this time next year, Donahoe said.

“Failure to act could be catastrophic,” Donahoe told members of the Senate Homeland Security and Governmental Affairs Committee, which oversees the postal service.

The new proposals reflect heightened desperation at an agency that has been on the decline for years. The rise of email has dramatically curbed demand for old-fashioned letters, while competitive delivery companies have put the squeeze on the post office’s business model. Last year, the post office delivered 171 billion pieces of mail, down 20 percent from just four years earlier. Volume is on track to fall an additional 2 percent this year.

But Donahoe put the blame for the current crisis on federal laws and labor agreements that he said unduly restrict his agency’s ability to adapt and promise more than the postal service can deliver. Labor costs amount to 80 percent of the postal service’s expenses, and current contracts contain a no-layoff provision. Changes to the frequency of service or delivery areas require federal legislation.

The postmaster’s request arrived just as lawmakers returned from a summer break and appeared prepared to pick up where they left off — in a fierce partisan battle over government spending and job creation. The post office crisis is likely to get thrown into the mix.

Both Democrats and Republicans are quick to express their support for postal services, but even the short-term measures under discussion are likely to find opposition.

The proposed changes to mail service likely will draw the broadest opposition. Representatives of the newspaper and magazine industry, both dependent on mail subscribers, told Congress to act carefully in eliminating Saturday delivery and post offices.

“We are concerned that rural America is being thrown overboard by a postal system too eager to lavish its assets onto highly competitive urban areas,” Tonda Rush, director of public policy at the National Newspaper Association, said in a statement. “Within this context, the loss of Saturday residential delivery would be a major blow.”

Postal unions also oppose much of Donahoe’s plan.

The unions have seen the ranks of postal service employees fall by 130,000 already in the past four years. The layoffs Donahoe has proposed would amount to roughly one-fifth of the workforce.

They come just months after the current contracts were negotiated. Donahoe also has proposed that the postal service withdraw from the federal employee health insurance plan and sponsor its own. It would also offer a defined benefit retirement plan for new employees.

“I am at a loss for adjectives sufficient to the task of describing these actions by the Postal Service,” said Cliff Guffey, president of the American Postal Workers Union. “Several that come close are outrageous, illegal and despicable.”

The postal service and the unions are pushing the administration to lessen the immediate crisis by giving the service between $50 and $75 billion they claim has been overpaid into federal retirement funds. The Obama administration has appeared reluctant to throw its support behind anything that could be labeled as another bailout.

John Berry, director of the government’s Office of Personnel Management, told the committee that the president would include long-term proposals for the postal service in a deficit reduction plan he has promised to unveil to Congress soon. Meanwhile, Democrats and Republicans in the Senate have proposed legislation. Rep. Darrell Issa, R-Calif., chairman of the House government oversight committee, has proposed an outside commission to craft a restructuring.

But Berry said Congress would have to act before his office would have the authority to return any money to the postal service that was allegedly overpaid to the retirement funds. Berry said Obama supports legislation that would defer the $5.5 billion payment for 90 days, giving Congress time to come up with other solutions.

“That’s not going to be a slam dunk here in this Congress,” said Sen. Joe Lieberman, I-Conn., committee chairman. “And that’s not going to solve the problem for the long run.”

Similar articles:

Marketplace News

Marketplace

Guidelines for posting on bangordailynews.com

The Bangor Daily News encourages comments about stories, but you must follow our terms of service.

In brief:

  1. Keep it civil and stay on topic
  2. No vulgarity, racial slurs, name-calling or personal attacks.
  3. People who harass others or joke about tragedies will be blocked.

The primary rule here is pretty simple: Treat others with the same respect you'd want for yourself. Here are some guidelines (see more):

  • Anonymous

    Must be the unions again! No tax payer money for them. We need those $$$ so we can win the war on terror.

  • Anonymous

    End the War on Terror.  End the war in Libya.  End the imperialist expansion of the United States. End the U.S. Postal Service.  End the existence of public sector unions.

  • Anonymous

    Why is that turncoat Lieberman still in Congress?  If it were not for him the first national healthcare plan would have passed before the GOP usurped Congress in the last election.  Joe the Jerk!

  • waynorth1

    I haven’t bought a stamp in years due to on line bill paying……and places that will charge less to mail packages.  Duh……..just a matter of time. 

  • Moose

    How come the Post Master General does not tell the truth about the mangement bonuses inwhich are handed at Christmas time. The supervisors nation from starting with the 204B’s to the Post Master General get anywhere from $1,400 per year to 150K per year Nation Wide???

  • Anonymous

    We are in the midst of moving away from the post office entirely.  I get all of my bills by email and communicate with people by cell phone or email.  I send Christmas cards and birthday cards and that’s about the extent of it (other than package delivery which is done well by private companies).  I believe that the post office is nearly obsolete.

  • Anonymous

    We are in the midst of moving away from the post office entirely.  I get all of my bills by email and communicate with people by cell phone or email.  I send Christmas cards and birthday cards and that’s about the extent of it (other than package delivery which is done well by private companies).  I believe that the post office is nearly obsolete.

  • Anonymous

    HOW TO SAVE THE POST OFFICE:

    1. Get rid of the union.
    2. Cut employees by 25%
    3. Cut delivery to four days per week.
    4. Close all postal stations with a population of less then 1,500.

  • Anonymous

    Saving the USPS is a must. Start by dropping one day of service. No reason exists to mandate closing the post offices for both days of the weekend. Instead have delivery from Tuesday to Saturday. Also keep open the possibility of having the post office open one evening for those who cannot get to the post office during normal business hours. Cutting delivery and cutting hours of operation would be a huge savings. The problem will be when the post office cuts hours with no concern for the working people who work a 40 hour week on steady days. Those are the people who cannot utilize the current hours except the Saturday morning hours.

  • Anonymous

    All those supposed Conservative ROBthePUBLICan legislators will tell you to cut cut cut…but they will be the first to demand that 6 day a week mail service continue to all the backwater junctions where their constituents live.

  • Anonymous

    All those supposed Conservative ROBthePUBLICan legislators will tell you to cut cut cut…but they will be the first to demand that 6 day a week mail service continue to all the backwater junctions where their constituents live.

  • Anonymous

    All those supposed Conservative ROBthePUBLICan legislators will tell you to cut cut cut…but they will be the first to demand that 6 day a week mail service continue to all the backwater junctions where their constituents live.

  • Anonymous

    1. Yeah…we should screw the workers
    2. Yes, only if a modified #4 happens as well
    3. 5 days and increase the rates on junk mail and DISSOLVE CONGRESSIONAL FRANKING PRIVILEGES.
    4. There should be closures (and probably many), but not blanket one-size-fits-none closures. What if there are no communities in 200 miles with less than 1,500 people.

  • Anonymous

    Per the USPS web site the average salary for a mail carrier is $38,000 to $66,300 ……. REALLY?????     How about not paying mail delivery staff who have no degree $25.00 +  an hr to walk around and put the freak’in mail in the mail box.  Salary + benefits + retirement…..it’s the mail people NOT a nuclear reactor……any nit wit who can read and knows their numbers can deliver the mail.

  • Anonymous

    If they are on the precipice of defaulting why have they been running those commercials telling the public our tax dollars don’t pay for USPS costs? I’m sure those TV spots cost a pretty penny. I think the postal service does serve a vital function but many more offices could be closed in Maine, and I’m sure in a lot of other states as well.

  • http://www.facebook.com/profile.php?id=1596904300 Bruce Bell

    public sector unions are a dying breed.

  • Anonymous

    Yes, I agree about rural branches. Some areas in southern and central Maine have populations over 1,500 but have several branches within ten or fifteen miles. Those are the ones that need closing not offices in far off rural areas.

  • Anonymous

    Yes, I agree about rural branches. Some areas in southern and central Maine have populations over 1,500 but have several branches within ten or fifteen miles. Those are the ones that need closing not offices in far off rural areas.

  • Anonymous

    Yes, I agree about rural branches. Some areas in southern and central Maine have populations over 1,500 but have several branches within ten or fifteen miles. Those are the ones that need closing not offices in far off rural areas.

  • Anonymous

    Yes, I agree about rural branches. Some areas in southern and central Maine have populations over 1,500 but have several branches within ten or fifteen miles. Those are the ones that need closing not offices in far off rural areas.

  • Anonymous

    Yes, I agree about rural branches. Some areas in southern and central Maine have populations over 1,500 but have several branches within ten or fifteen miles. Those are the ones that need closing not offices in far off rural areas.

  • Anonymous

    Yes, I agree about rural branches. Some areas in southern and central Maine have populations over 1,500 but have several branches within ten or fifteen miles. Those are the ones that need closing not offices in far off rural areas.

  • Anonymous

    This is going to really  tick off the union. One more nail in the coffin of Obama’s reelection chances.

  • Anonymous

    Not at all and I use the postal service a lot.

  • Anonymous

    Not at all and I use the postal service a lot.

  • Anonymous

    Those a re union sponsored ads.

  • Anonymous

    Those a re union sponsored ads.

  • Anonymous

    They need to have a Senate hearing to hear that the U. S. Post Office is on the verge of financial collapse?  What- they don’t even know our whole counrty is on the verge of  financial collapse? 

  • Anonymous

    They need to have a Senate hearing to hear that the U. S. Post Office is on the verge of financial collapse?  What- they don’t even know our whole counrty is on the verge of  financial collapse? 

  • Dana Andrews

    yeah, #4 is a tough one.  The closest PO for me is in a town with a population of 300.  I have a 40 minute drive to pick up my mail. Over an hour in the winter. 

  • Dana Andrews

    yeah, #4 is a tough one.  The closest PO for me is in a town with a population of 300.  I have a 40 minute drive to pick up my mail. Over an hour in the winter. 

  • Dana Andrews

    yeah, #4 is a tough one.  The closest PO for me is in a town with a population of 300.  I have a 40 minute drive to pick up my mail. Over an hour in the winter. 

  • Anonymous

    Pension costs are way out of line.
    Loafers collecting massive checks.

  • Anonymous

    WHERE IS THE STORY IN THIS LIBERALLY BIASED RAG ABOUT HOFFAS ATTACK ON  THE TEAPARTY! I HAVE READ PLENTY OF ARTICLES ABOUT “CIVIL DISCOURSE! Sorry to post this in the wrong article but the Bangor Daily Pravda doesn’t print political stories unless its leftist propaganda! (I’m being slightly sarcastic.

  • http://pulse.yahoo.com/_TJYZV7JWWJCPG7BX65EM6UOHZ4 Skowhegan Resident

    Post Office? I thought they were out of business already.  They are still around , golly gee, who would have known

  • http://pulse.yahoo.com/_TJYZV7JWWJCPG7BX65EM6UOHZ4 Skowhegan Resident

    Post Office? I thought they were out of business already.  They are still around , golly gee, who would have known

  • OldWench

    That’s the dumbest comment I’ve ever seen on here.  How do you propose all the people who live in small towns to send and receive mail or use postal services if they have to drive 30 miles to pick up or send mail?  Businesses need mail service every day.  They’ve already cut so many workers that we don’t get our mail until after 5pm most days, tracked packages show no movement until they are delivered and the unions aren’t the ones making the crap business decisions that make them less competitive.  

  • OldWench

    I just listened to the video you must be talking about.  I’m not sure why you think this is some huge issue that needs to be reported on.  He basically voiced the same anger millions of American workers feel towards the Tea Party for the way they have been attacking unions, which are the organizations that protect the rights of workers.  He’s not a candidate and if he wants to call the Tea Party politicians SOBs all the more power to him.  If Obama said that, it would be another story, but that’s not what happened.

  • OldWench

    Um…although I don’t belong to a union and never have…I agree with Hoffa on this one.  I wouldn’t vote for any Republican now that the Tea Party has hijacked their party even if they paid me a million dollars.

  • Anonymous

    violent rhetoric?  take the sobs (tea party) out by voting for their opponents?  fox news got you worked up into a lather over this?  are you serious?

  • Anonymous

    Yet another case of where the union will fail to make concessions in light of the obvious and the USPS as we know it will cease to exist. Good Riddance. UPS and FedEx kick their *ss.

  • http://www.facebook.com/ken.bouchard1 Ken Bouchard

    But should we also close all public libraries, as Kindle and such take over the need for books and printed other matter? I still need my checks mailed, my magazines, and such. I guess it is that can you really rely on your email? I suppose online email is fairly reliable, but I cannot read my email without electricity and the internet. Here in Maine, that is not always available.

  • Anonymous

    Boo hoo. Lots of people work outside in the weather. Get over yourself and your union.

    By the way, how much do you suppose our soldiers in Iraq and Afghanistan make? I bet they’d be psyched to walk through some snow instead of what they’re doing.

  • http://www.facebook.com/ken.bouchard1 Ken Bouchard

    But costs are still less for USPS than for FEDEX or UPS especially for small items.
    The reason, is that you may often have to pick up your package at the post office, thus saving all the gas needed to transport said packages.

  • http://www.facebook.com/ken.bouchard1 Ken Bouchard

    Nail it shut as far as I’m concerned…

  • Anonymous

    OMG….I can’t even believe someone posted this!

    WOW….talk about Boo-Hoo….and what happened to that precious 40 hour work week the labor unions so lovingly provided for these industrious, laborious people?  These folks are union Wolly, why are you claiming they work 6 days a week?  I thought the whole concept of a five day work week and the weekend was the work of the precious unions.  Are you saying these union folk are getting stiffed by their own union?   I think not.  Once again, the left lies, and lies, and lies continuously…apparently it IS what they do best!

    Now lets go ask a Fed Ex or UPS employee these same questions that Wolly proposed above.  My guess is they’d say “yeah, I don’t mind it, it’s what I do, and I like what I do, if I didn’t, I’d go look for something else”…pretty much the same as the rest of us non-union, non-pampered, real American workers would say.

  • Anonymous

    UPS is Union….

  • Anonymous

    Closed on Saturday is better than a Monday……..

  • Anonymous

    Don’t punish rural Americans.  Whatever the solution, it should affect everyone in exactly the same manner and to exactly the same extent.

  • Moose

    Sorry LOL.. The MPG never comes out and tells about this that been going on for years.

  • Moose

    If it was not for the unions we all would be getting $5 per hour and management would be getting $15 to $30 per hour.So thank the  ( UNIONS )

  • Anonymous

    Perfect. This happens on Obama’s watch and it will be the end of his BS.

  • Anonymous

    More layoffs on the way… watch the ripple effect, as your neighbors can no longer afford to buy goods and services in your community. More businesses will close. Your own layoff gets closer… Republicans cheer.

  • Moose

    You do not need a degree to make $25 a hour.. At least they are working its call to many with degree’s in this case making $50k to $95k per year..  If someone gets hurt lets put them in a Post Office and make them Post Master out of site out of mind. Really smart of the PO.. Collins has a degree but his she worth 178k per year. ( NOT ).. 

  • OldWench

    Government employees get pensions because they DON’T get Social Security.  What would you propose they use to retire? 

  • Anonymous

    FedEx is the USPS largest customer. They give millions of packages a day. It is called SMARTPOST.

    Maine has over 400 Post Offices. Some within just a few miles of each other.  Small towns should be able to combine service areas and make a huge reduction in costs alone in rents. Reduce one day and make 5 day a week mail service. Or, reduce delivery at least and just open the office for a few hours each day.

    I run a company, if I run out of money I close.  This stuff has been known for a long time, just getting pushed to the next person to handle. Now we are at a turning point.

    What I do not understand is why the public has such a hard time understanding that they are broke and layoffs and cuts WILL NEED TO BE DONE or the system will crash. It is not something they want to do, rather it is something they must do.

    I do not want to see anyone lose thier job either, but we can’t keep paying for something that does not work.

    Does anyone really grasp that this country is ready to colapse? It is because we are not willing do run this country as a business.  I know it is tuff. And it will hurt. But my God peeps, PLEASE see the light here. GMC was only the tip of the iceburg. Banks, Gov agencies the list is going to get larger soon.

    I love my Chevy truck, but the bail out should of NEVER happened.   We have to get over ourselves and get into real issues. The country is BROKE. Cuts will need to be made.

    IMO, get rid of the IRS, start a flat sales tax. That way the poor pay the least and the rich pay the most. It also insures that ALL AMERICANS will pay taxes. NO ONE gets a free pass, NO ONE. Ilegalls will pay, drug dealers will pay, Corp America will pay, GOV employees will pay.

    That will take care of the 30-40 million that do not pay any taxes at all.

    Yeah, I am upset, the private sector pays and pays and pays while our Gov keeps getting a free pass.

    I SAY, IF THE CONGRESS CAN’T BALANCE THE BUDGET, they then can not run for office again. Let someone in who is willing to do just that. RUN THIS COUNTRY BALANCED!!!

  • Anonymous

    So is the USPS.

  • Anonymous

    Be happy to.     Nov 6 2012.

  • http://pulse.yahoo.com/_HBI72U5F3VMZRIYZWJLCMT4RYM Wendy

    Then why did they donate $1 MILLION to the MDA over the weekend??? 

  • yowsayowsa1

    UPS isn’t run by the government.

  • http://pulse.yahoo.com/_JFBKOI7EXRX7MUJFO4JAI3LTQ4 James

    Much of this is blamed on the rise in use of e-mail and online payments, etc.  My concern is what will happen to folks who are not connected, and have no wish to be, like my elderly mother.

  • yowsayowsa1

    They close for lunch now.

     A working stiff with a 9 to 5 job has to get somebody else to do his mail business.

  • Anonymous

    Try going to cspan.org you can watch the hearing on the post office. Do you really think that the post office is losing money because of the union ?? Is the post office losing money because of the internet ? Now people say any one can deliver mail go an take the test as i did an its not easy to pass .

  • Anonymous

    How far should a person half to drive to get to a post office  ??

  • Anonymous

    How far should a person half to drive to get to a post office  ??

  • Dan Troop

    The USPS has been going broke for the past 15 years. Part of the problem is the union but the major problem is technology. Since the invention of email, except for businesses, and may of them have gone paperless, very few people send snail mail anymore and that meant great losses in revenue. Doesn’t anyone remember USPS tryign to get a bill passed in Congress allowing them to charge a fee for email?

    Time for a complete restructure of USPS and it’s not going to be pretty!

  • Anonymous

    They had one on tuesday you can go to cspan.org an see it

  • Anonymous

    Whats up with u rude people all jobs can be hard,I feel bad for the mailman, but we all must do our jobs  hard or easy thats life

  • Anonymous

    One thing I don’t understand about the USPS, is why does it cost so much to rent a mail box at the post office,.Where as if you buy your own box, place it out by the road; then your mail gets delivered to you at no cost . It seems as though it would be the other way around.

  • http://www.facebook.com/people/Lisa-Priest/100002122632449 Lisa Priest

    I feel if all the top paying job figures took a 5% pay cut that they wouldnt even notice it would help alot. Just like our politicians too, if they all took a 5% paycut look what that would save us each year. With what they get paid they would never notice it. They have everything paid for when there on the clock so what does it really cost them out of there own pocket. Luxury Money? Just saying !!!

  • http://www.facebook.com/people/Lisa-Priest/100002122632449 Lisa Priest

    I feel if all the top paying job figures took a 5% pay cut that they wouldnt even notice it would help alot. Just like our politicians too, if they all took a 5% paycut look what that would save us each year. With what they get paid they would never notice it. They have everything paid for when there on the clock so what does it really cost them out of there own pocket. Luxury Money? Just saying !!!

  • http://www.facebook.com/people/Lisa-Priest/100002122632449 Lisa Priest

    I feel if all the top paying job figures took a 5% pay cut that they wouldnt even notice it would help alot. Just like our politicians too, if they all took a 5% paycut look what that would save us each year. With what they get paid they would never notice it. They have everything paid for when there on the clock so what does it really cost them out of there own pocket. Luxury Money? Just saying !!!

  • http://www.facebook.com/people/Lisa-Priest/100002122632449 Lisa Priest

    I feel if all the top paying job figures took a 5% pay cut that they wouldnt even notice it would help alot. Just like our politicians too, if they all took a 5% paycut look what that would save us each year. With what they get paid they would never notice it. They have everything paid for when there on the clock so what does it really cost them out of there own pocket. Luxury Money? Just saying !!!

  • http://www.facebook.com/people/Lisa-Priest/100002122632449 Lisa Priest

    I feel if all the top paying job figures took a 5% pay cut that they wouldnt even notice it would help alot. Just like our politicians too, if they all took a 5% paycut look what that would save us each year. With what they get paid they would never notice it. They have everything paid for when there on the clock so what does it really cost them out of there own pocket. Luxury Money? Just saying !!!

  • http://www.facebook.com/people/Lisa-Priest/100002122632449 Lisa Priest

    I feel if all the top paying job figures took a 5% pay cut that they wouldnt even notice it would help alot. Just like our politicians too, if they all took a 5% paycut look what that would save us each year. With what they get paid they would never notice it. They have everything paid for when there on the clock so what does it really cost them out of there own pocket. Luxury Money? Just saying !!!

  • http://www.facebook.com/people/Lisa-Priest/100002122632449 Lisa Priest

    I feel if all the top paying job figures took a 5% pay cut that they wouldnt even notice it would help alot. Just like our politicians too, if they all took a 5% paycut look what that would save us each year. With what they get paid they would never notice it. They have everything paid for when there on the clock so what does it really cost them out of there own pocket. Luxury Money? Just saying !!!

  • Anonymous

    Te wisest thing to do is to put out requests for bids and disband the Post Office completely. This has been a money losing expense on  taxpayers for decades, and a very profitable business for unions.  Any Coporation tht loses money either tightens it’s belt or it gets out of that business.  It is obvious that the Post Office cannot rfun it’s own affairs, and should now turn it over to a business that can make it profitable.  A lot of conditions would have to be put into any contract that is out sourced, adn should be limited by a time schedule to any succesful bidder.

    Most mail that comes now is only junk mail.  Some of our older citizens of which I am one get their bills by mail, but most other mail, except for packages is done through the internet.  Charging internet usefr fees is not an answer, it is only another tax of which we now have too many!

    Bite the bullet government and post office officials.  Put it up for bid as soon as possible!  

  • Anonymous

    Te wisest thing to do is to put out requests for bids and disband the Post Office completely. This has been a money losing expense on  taxpayers for decades, and a very profitable business for unions.  Any Coporation tht loses money either tightens it’s belt or it gets out of that business.  It is obvious that the Post Office cannot rfun it’s own affairs, and should now turn it over to a business that can make it profitable.  A lot of conditions would have to be put into any contract that is out sourced, adn should be limited by a time schedule to any succesful bidder.

    Most mail that comes now is only junk mail.  Some of our older citizens of which I am one get their bills by mail, but most other mail, except for packages is done through the internet.  Charging internet usefr fees is not an answer, it is only another tax of which we now have too many!

    Bite the bullet government and post office officials.  Put it up for bid as soon as possible!  

  • Anonymous

    Te wisest thing to do is to put out requests for bids and disband the Post Office completely. This has been a money losing expense on  taxpayers for decades, and a very profitable business for unions.  Any Coporation tht loses money either tightens it’s belt or it gets out of that business.  It is obvious that the Post Office cannot rfun it’s own affairs, and should now turn it over to a business that can make it profitable.  A lot of conditions would have to be put into any contract that is out sourced, adn should be limited by a time schedule to any succesful bidder.

    Most mail that comes now is only junk mail.  Some of our older citizens of which I am one get their bills by mail, but most other mail, except for packages is done through the internet.  Charging internet usefr fees is not an answer, it is only another tax of which we now have too many!

    Bite the bullet government and post office officials.  Put it up for bid as soon as possible!  

  • Anonymous

    Te wisest thing to do is to put out requests for bids and disband the Post Office completely. This has been a money losing expense on  taxpayers for decades, and a very profitable business for unions.  Any Coporation tht loses money either tightens it’s belt or it gets out of that business.  It is obvious that the Post Office cannot rfun it’s own affairs, and should now turn it over to a business that can make it profitable.  A lot of conditions would have to be put into any contract that is out sourced, adn should be limited by a time schedule to any succesful bidder.

    Most mail that comes now is only junk mail.  Some of our older citizens of which I am one get their bills by mail, but most other mail, except for packages is done through the internet.  Charging internet usefr fees is not an answer, it is only another tax of which we now have too many!

    Bite the bullet government and post office officials.  Put it up for bid as soon as possible!  

  • Anonymous

    The Obama administration will NOT want mass layoffs in the postal service now with the unemployment rate currently at 9.1%   That wouldn’t help Obama’s re-election efforts at all.
    I don’t see Donahoe’s plan being enacted without a lot of back room deals being made.
    Too much money involved going to the ‘higher ups’ for it to slide through without a battle.

    They will come up with  some compromise and tell us about it later.
    The phrase “…we have to pass this so that you can find out what is in it…” comes to mind.

    I received a letter from a friend in Canada recently and the cost of their stamps = 59 cents. OUCH!

  • Anonymous

    What about cops, corrections officers, and firemen? 

  • Anonymous

    There are too many issues in this article to discuss.  The biggest problem is the union contract there are no outs in it and management can blame themselves for that.  I think that if you can’t afford to pay then you can let them go but try and prove that.  Whoever negotiated for managment must have been a union representative in sheeps clothing.

  • Anonymous

    I don’t think has ANYTHING to do with whose “watch” this is on, and has more to do with the outdated mode of delivery.  There is no question that email and electronic delivery are the demise of the USPS.  The Post Office survived just fine prior to the electronic age.  Wow.  This is not “just another example” of the government gone wild.  

    Also, the reason those guys are paid so well is because of a little thing called trust… something that is hard to come by these days.  The carriers have to be trust worthy folks, which unfortunately, in today’s day and age comes at a price.  Isn’t that neat?  We now have to pay people for things that we used to have pride in.

  • Anonymous

    I think they should close a day a week, but how about Monday instead of Saturday?  Saturday is the only day some people can make it to the post office.  A lot of the rural offices should just close though because they have ridiculous hours…for example 9-11 and then 1:30-3:30…why bother???  USPS is good for Media Mail and then lighter packages…up to about 3 pounds.  Other then that FedEx is the way to ship packages.

  • Anonymous

    Try workimg in 140+ degree weather with 50+ lbs of gear with bullets flying? The USPS pays to much in wages, along with payroll and benefits this could top $45+ per hour. I hope that Gov don’t give them an open check?  Obama has already grown GOV 7-10% in the  past 3 years and AMERICA has lost private sector jobs. Now he wants to spent $300 BILLON in Job creation talk about growing GOV.These jobs would be in union related fields like road building ect,the kind of jobs we need in AMERICA are ones that are going to last and put real $$ into the small towns all across this nation. Obama add more Money to our debt so the unions can put more $$ into your campagn and your pockets.Gov is starting to see what we are not going to stand for,we can’t aford to let our guard down and give Obama 4 more years. Lets drill for oil and gas here in our own country and put people to work here, is this to easy?

  • Anonymous

    Because that is money collected at Post Offices as donations by the public. 

  • Anonymous

    that just shows how smart you are.  204bs don’t get bonuses and neither do level 17 eas.  but go ahead and keep making stuff up if you would like.

  • Anonymous

    that just shows how smart you are.  204bs don’t get bonuses and neither do level 17 eas.  but go ahead and keep making stuff up if you would like.

  • Anonymous

    just like fedex, right?

  • Anonymous

    just like fedex, right?

  • Anonymous

    i used to work for the post office.  i’ve never worked at a facility where people whine so much while they make 25 dollars an hour with great benefits.  75% of them also take hour long breaks and slow down to a crawl delaying mail when they are told to stop talking and actually do something.  most management are wusses and don’t do anything and the union sucks any extra money out of the place by filing bs grievances and getting free money.  thats the problem with the po.  weak management and out of control unions.  they should all be proud of themselves.

  • Anonymous

    They shouldn’t be unionized either.

  • Anonymous

    They shouldn’t be unionized either.

  • Anonymous

    You know that $25/hr for a standard 2,000 hour work-year is $50,000, right?

  • Anonymous

    You know that $25/hr for a standard 2,000 hour work-year is $50,000, right?

  • Anonymous

    You know that $25/hr for a standard 2,000 hour work-year is $50,000, right?

  • Anonymous

    You know that $25/hr for a standard 2,000 hour work-year is $50,000, right?

  • Anonymous

    “It is impossible to bargain collectively with the government.”

    The founders of the labor movement viewed unions as a vehicle to get
    workers more of the profits they help create. Government workers,
    however, don’t generate profits. They merely negotiate for more tax
    money. When government unions strike, they strike against taxpayers.
    F.D.R. considered this “unthinkable and intolerable.”

    Government collective bargaining means voters do not have the final
    say on public policy. Instead their elected representatives must
    negotiate spending and policy decisions with unions. That is not exactly
    democratic – a fact that unions once recognized.

    their should be no unions for peole who hold government jobs and that includes the usps.  if your not alllowed to make a profit then what is the union their for?  to negotiate for my tax money.  i’m calling bull.

  • Anonymous

    “It is impossible to bargain collectively with the government.”

    The founders of the labor movement viewed unions as a vehicle to get
    workers more of the profits they help create. Government workers,
    however, don’t generate profits. They merely negotiate for more tax
    money. When government unions strike, they strike against taxpayers.
    F.D.R. considered this “unthinkable and intolerable.”

    Government collective bargaining means voters do not have the final
    say on public policy. Instead their elected representatives must
    negotiate spending and policy decisions with unions. That is not exactly
    democratic – a fact that unions once recognized.

    their should be no unions for peole who hold government jobs and that includes the usps.  if your not alllowed to make a profit then what is the union their for?  to negotiate for my tax money.  i’m calling bull.

  • Anonymous

    “It is impossible to bargain collectively with the government.”

    The founders of the labor movement viewed unions as a vehicle to get
    workers more of the profits they help create. Government workers,
    however, don’t generate profits. They merely negotiate for more tax
    money. When government unions strike, they strike against taxpayers.
    F.D.R. considered this “unthinkable and intolerable.”

    Government collective bargaining means voters do not have the final
    say on public policy. Instead their elected representatives must
    negotiate spending and policy decisions with unions. That is not exactly
    democratic – a fact that unions once recognized.

    their should be no unions for peole who hold government jobs and that includes the usps.  if your not alllowed to make a profit then what is the union their for?  to negotiate for my tax money.  i’m calling bull.

  • Anonymous

    “It is impossible to bargain collectively with the government.”

    The founders of the labor movement viewed unions as a vehicle to get
    workers more of the profits they help create. Government workers,
    however, don’t generate profits. They merely negotiate for more tax
    money. When government unions strike, they strike against taxpayers.
    F.D.R. considered this “unthinkable and intolerable.”

    Government collective bargaining means voters do not have the final
    say on public policy. Instead their elected representatives must
    negotiate spending and policy decisions with unions. That is not exactly
    democratic – a fact that unions once recognized.

    their should be no unions for peole who hold government jobs and that includes the usps.  if your not alllowed to make a profit then what is the union their for?  to negotiate for my tax money.  i’m calling bull.

  • Anonymous

    “It is impossible to bargain collectively with the government.”

    The founders of the labor movement viewed unions as a vehicle to get
    workers more of the profits they help create. Government workers,
    however, don’t generate profits. They merely negotiate for more tax
    money. When government unions strike, they strike against taxpayers.
    F.D.R. considered this “unthinkable and intolerable.”

    Government collective bargaining means voters do not have the final
    say on public policy. Instead their elected representatives must
    negotiate spending and policy decisions with unions. That is not exactly
    democratic – a fact that unions once recognized.

    their should be no unions for peole who hold government jobs and that includes the usps.  if your not alllowed to make a profit then what is the union their for?  to negotiate for my tax money.  i’m calling bull.

  • Anonymous

    “It is impossible to bargain collectively with the government.”

    The founders of the labor movement viewed unions as a vehicle to get
    workers more of the profits they help create. Government workers,
    however, don’t generate profits. They merely negotiate for more tax
    money. When government unions strike, they strike against taxpayers.
    F.D.R. considered this “unthinkable and intolerable.”

    Government collective bargaining means voters do not have the final
    say on public policy. Instead their elected representatives must
    negotiate spending and policy decisions with unions. That is not exactly
    democratic – a fact that unions once recognized.

    their should be no unions for peole who hold government jobs and that includes the usps.  if your not alllowed to make a profit then what is the union their for?  to negotiate for my tax money.  i’m calling bull.

  • Anonymous

    First of all, let’s let the dirty little secret out of the bag.  Postal Service employees aren’t covered by the same rules the rest of the government workers are covered by.  That’s because the second-worst president in the last hundred years (Carter) allowed them to negotiate for pay and benefits.  They don’t pay anyway near the same amount of money for their benefits that all the rest of the federal employees pay.  And a “no lay-off clause,” whoever heard of that?  Who could run a business if they couldn’t lay people off when times were tough lol?

    There are two courses of action that will solve this problem.  We abolish their current contract and severely limit their collective bargaining rights until the changes are made to make the UPS break even.  Or, we can completely privatize the UPS and it will survive and be profitable with about 25% of the employees it currently has.

    The current system is a fraud.  It isn’t a government agency, but is subsidized whenever it loses money (which it always does).  

  • Anonymous

    Just out of curiosity, do you get paid overtime for that sixth day?

  • Anonymous

    How do politicians perfect that look where they act like they are looking at you but they really aren’t?

  • Anonymous

    I think it will be just another nail in Obama’s coffin. The prices have been steadily rising for mediocre service at best. Easily once a month I get someone else’s mail in my box, which makes me wonder what I am not getting of my own.
    All business owners must advance with the changing times. The US Government seems to have a hard time with this. No different than a cassette factory updating to CD’s.
    Don’t get me wrong, I would like to see the USPS continue. Obviously electronic bill paying is not secure.

  • Anonymous

    I think it will be just another nail in Obama’s coffin. The prices have been steadily rising for mediocre service at best. Easily once a month I get someone else’s mail in my box, which makes me wonder what I am not getting of my own.
    All business owners must advance with the changing times. The US Government seems to have a hard time with this. No different than a cassette factory updating to CD’s.
    Don’t get me wrong, I would like to see the USPS continue. Obviously electronic bill paying is not secure.

  • Anonymous

    I think it will be just another nail in Obama’s coffin. The prices have been steadily rising for mediocre service at best. Easily once a month I get someone else’s mail in my box, which makes me wonder what I am not getting of my own.
    All business owners must advance with the changing times. The US Government seems to have a hard time with this. No different than a cassette factory updating to CD’s.
    Don’t get me wrong, I would like to see the USPS continue. Obviously electronic bill paying is not secure.

  • Anonymous

    I think it will be just another nail in Obama’s coffin. The prices have been steadily rising for mediocre service at best. Easily once a month I get someone else’s mail in my box, which makes me wonder what I am not getting of my own.
    All business owners must advance with the changing times. The US Government seems to have a hard time with this. No different than a cassette factory updating to CD’s.
    Don’t get me wrong, I would like to see the USPS continue. Obviously electronic bill paying is not secure.

  • Anonymous

    I delivered the Bangor Daily news for 10 years as a kid growing up. I had 80 customers. I have no desire to ever be a postal worker delivering mail. Biting dogs, ice covered steps, snow galore in the driveway, bone chilling wind chills, etc etc, granted they deliver a lot of junk mail but I would not want to walk in their shoes.

  • Noah

    What causes these catastrophes?

    Dumping 120,000 postal workers increases the unemployment statistics.  Adding the Borders loss of 60,000 or more, increases them even more.  There are lot more.  Let’s not even consider how many American’s jobs are overseas.

    The bigger those figures rise, the more the presidential hopefuls like it.  The electronic media goes ape.  A new poll every day piles on the bad news favoring the GOP-Tea Party people. 

    Meanwhile, as the figures continue to rise, the Polls hastily add Obama’s slip within the hearts of the public.  Wall Street drops a couple of hundred points and presidential hopefuls whip the public into a frenzy of hope . Romney and Perry capitalizing on the misfortune of thousands of unemployed.  Nonetheless, promising to get everyone a job.   No descriptive plan – just a promise.

    If elected – everyone will be employed. 

    It’s in the same political world as Social Security and Medicare which are considered doomed.  

    Cut the heathcare, slash Social Security and kick out Medicare.  These are the answers by the GOPer-Tea Party ensemble.  Elimination of these programs will restore health and vitality to the country.

    Forget the Bush Tax Cuts to the rich.  They need to stay in place so they can continue to take people off unemployment, by providing many jobs.  Ignore the monopolistic control by the oil companies and the $10 million dollar executive salaries.  And stop rapping the oil moguls for racking up more than $10 billion profit in the last quarter.

    Perhaps Congress could take a wage cut and drop their medical and pension benefits.  Same across the land with governors and state legislatures.  Time for some of these overpaid politicians to get into the unemployment lines.

    Alas, when it’s time to cut, it’s the workers who get the first bite.  The boys and girls at the top will continue to claim an outlandish salary, while many of the GOP Tea Party people will groan about a letter carrier’s $36,000 pay.

    The ultimate  goal is a below minimum wage rate, eliminating it altogether as the total goal.  No in between.   Just rich and poor.

    Cut welfare and limit unemployment benefits.  Kill any and all proposals that would permit seniors to buy their medication at lower prices. 

  • Anonymous

    More violent rhetoric from the left. How is ending public sector unions scorched earth? And do you not believe FedEx and UPS would pick up where the USPS left off? Saying ending the wars is in no way NOT supporting the troops. Do you believe the troops want to stay? And you believe Public sector unions are the only non-corporate voice in congress.

    I am sorry, but nonunion companies have jobs that support the middle class. Lots of nonunion jobs in Texas, and plenty of middle class there. To believe that unions, and only unions, are responsible for the middle class is ridiculous. See how much of your dues go to political contributions, and we will see who truly has too much influence in congress. GM was STOLEN from bold holders(who in a bankruptcy are the first to be paid) and given to the UAW. Who did the UAW support?? The same people who then rewarded them with their very own car maker free of its debts. INSIDE JOB! And where are you getting this, America is progressive? I think it is clear FOLLOWING the path of the European countries like France, Greece, Portugal, and Spain is not a winning path. They all have your progress. Low retirement ages, fixed pensions, short work weeks, government healthcare, and BANKRUPT. Just like us because of, medicare, medicaid, bailouts, Rx drug program, soon to be social security, and “free”(read paid for by your taxpaying neighbor) healthcare.

    Government has no money of its own. All its money comes from us, the people. Over 40% pay no federal income tax. Wake up from your coma and realize you can not keep robbing the “rich” to pay for the poor.

  • Anonymous

    That is correct… the Postal Service is not a government agency. And I say 4 days a week is plenty for getting the junk we get in our mailboxes. So many people have gone to paperless statements for bills and pay online. It is mostly ads and catalogues etc in my MB these days, and the occasional card. I think we can get on fine with only 4 days a week Tuesday-Friday. 

    Having said that, I do appreciate the mail delivery folks and the folks who have to put up with really obnoxious patrons at the window in the PO. As for the whining about the mail carriers and their cushy jobs, I can say that most other outdoor workers do not walk that many miles per one work day, have to put up with weather AND violent dogs (my neighbor’s dog BIT the mail lady and a couple other folks before he was eventually put down… and the neighbor blamed the mail lady… who LOVES dogs by the way)

    Let’s trim the number of days and be done with the discussion. Everyone get on paperless billing and pay bills online and live in the 21st century.

    Heck, I even deposit my checks online via my phone! No need to go to the bank either.

  • Noah

    You’re just “nit wit it.”

  • Noah

    Slam the workers.  That’s the creed of the GOPer-TP group.  Cut their pay.  They make too much.   Anybody can do their job.  The only people who should receive a big salary are those with their rear ends implanted behind a big mahogany desk.

    I’d like to see  one of these posters  tackle just one half of an unplowed street and unshovelled  driveways during a snowstorm.  Listening to their reactions when customers bemoan a late delivery on a sweltering 80 degree high humidity day, would be interesting.  Trying to keep envelopes dry during a rainstorm would provide yet another interesting highlight of those people who are quick to condemn the working class.

  • Anonymous

    I like doing away with Congressional Franking privileges. Great idea. And do away with ALL ad flyers. THAT is one big reason folks don’t want to lower the number of days… the grocery flyer! OMG

  • Anonymous

    what do you mean “half” to drive? are you saying half the distance from one point to another? Or do you mean “have” to drive?

  • Anonymous

    if you don’t have electricity, where do you live? Most people actually have that now. I think we’d be spending money better to make sure Maine is totally wired for internet and that getting cheaper for people. Post Office? We don’t really need it. You can even get stamps online now. Maybe just regional POs and not one in every corner of every little town. My town has a regional. But within a ten minute drive there are at least 5 others. Wasteful.

  • Anonymous

    it is already privatized… let not the United States in the US Postal Service fool ya!

  • Noah

    He or she was just pointing out some of the challenges faced by postal carriers.  I didn’t think they were “boo-hooing.” 

    It’s the inability of some people to understand the job functions of their workers that result in massive lay-offs.

    I pointed out how slippery the sidewalks and driveway were to our mail carrier.  He raised his boot and showed me his clamp ons.  “Nothing to it,” he said.  

    Most of these put downs by the anti labor, anti left and anti freeze people typify where our country is, in having respect for the working man and woman.

    You don’t hear them boo-hooing when oil execs bemoan their troubles about having sore backs with carruing their $10 million paychecks home.

    GOP-Tea Party goal – attack the workers.

  • Noah

    The Tea Party-GOPer Mainfesto.

    “…own guns.”

    My, my, aren’t we dangerous people to mess around with?

  • Noah

    Glenn  Beck overflow isn’t it?

  • Anonymous

    If these folks are paid well, then good for them.  I wish you were paid well too, iTHINKsoToo, TLMMSW, John Dickenson…

    No need to bash people who only make $60,000 a year.

    From the mail I get, it seems most of the postal service customers are retailers who bulk mail advertisements and catalogues.

    Quick messages now go by email; packages go via FedEx and UPS.

    Maybe the retail industry needs to pay more for junk mailings and heavy catalogues.  That wouldn’t hurt my feelings.

  • Anonymous

    If these folks are paid well, then good for them.  I wish you were paid well too, iTHINKsoToo, TLMMSW, John Dickenson…

    No need to bash people who only make $60,000 a year.

    From the mail I get, it seems most of the postal service customers are retailers who bulk mail advertisements and catalogues.

    Quick messages now go by email; packages go via FedEx and UPS.

    Maybe the retail industry needs to pay more for junk mailings and heavy catalogues.  That wouldn’t hurt my feelings.

  • Noah

    You must not mention management.  It’s those walking the rounds each who are to blame.   Those scrubbing the floors, chasing the bad guys, hauling freight, nursing patients.  fighting fires, saving lives.

    Same everywhere.  Those working their butts off are being deprived of the Social Security and Medicare benefits they have contributed to as working people.  

    It’s the GOPer-Tea Party manifesto.

  • Anonymous

    I took the test years ago and received a 93….then completed the supplemental  application process but opted to go to Grad School……you know to get another one of those silly degrees you people are bemoaning about…..you guys are hilarious……awwwwww walking in snow,  getting wet in the rain, slippery side walks, 80 degrees ….kinda like what the rest of us have to contend with while living in Maine….If your job is so difficult and tedious do what other people do….look for another job….except with no college degree and a limited skill set there is no way you will be making the $$ you were making being a postal worker….beggars can’t be choosers…….LMAO.

  • Noah

    The GOPer-Tea Party Central Committee will defer all comment.  It’s their opinion that  workers and retirees are the malaise facing this country.

    Oil company big wigs pull down $10 million annual salaries.  The companies, all controlled by one corporation, are the biggest contributors to Congress.

    Consequently, a panel attempting to determine the cause of high gas prizes flunked.  Protected by some on the panel who ruled that executives should not have to answer certain questions.

    It is incredulous that some of these posts slam workers pulling down $25 grand a year, without even considering the $187,000 annual paid to members of Congress.  This does not include full medical and hospital benefits, with extra remuneration paid if you serve on any committee. It also does not include full payment for offices and staff.

    Postal service execs also receive tremendous salaries.  No cuts considered – naturally.

    The GOPer-Tea Party intends to kill all unions along with collective bargaining.  All public service sectors are targeted.  Maine is one of several states being filleted under direct orders from Central Command at GOPer-Tea Party HQ.

  • Anonymous

    We have a post office inside the Hardware Store.  Why can’t little stores in small towns do the same thing?  No need for a seperate P.O. building.  Works well here.

  • Anonymous

    I could give Cliff Guffey some adjectives… but I don’t think he would like them. I understand that these guys are in a constant struggle to get what they need for their unions, but I think that is a little bit much eh? It’s pretty clear that the postal service is hurting, and these cuts weren’t proposed to help rich fat cats or torture working individuals, why does this guy think that people are actually going to believe what he says?

  • Anonymous

    I could give Cliff Guffey some adjectives… but I don’t think he would like them. I understand that these guys are in a constant struggle to get what they need for their unions, but I think that is a little bit much eh? It’s pretty clear that the postal service is hurting, and these cuts weren’t proposed to help rich fat cats or torture working individuals, why does this guy think that people are actually going to believe what he says?

  • Anonymous

    *and some nouns too!

  • Anonymous

    *and some nouns too!

  • Anonymous

    It’s evident you don’t know anything about the Tea Party.  We’ve been in deep trouble for years now and the Tea Party folks were only “elected” a few months ago.  They are being demonized by the MEDIA and you are falling for it.  These aren’t by any means rich people.  They are down to earth people who haven’t been in the Poliical arena forever that are upset about the way our Country is going.  Small Government is not a bad thing, Balancing our budget is not a bad thing, getting rid of the waste, fraud, and abuse is needed badly, can’t you see that we cannot keep spending money that we don’t have.  We are in debt to China and only pay the interest on our debt.  THIS IS WRONG. 

  • Anonymous

    It’s evident you don’t know anything about the Tea Party.  We’ve been in deep trouble for years now and the Tea Party folks were only “elected” a few months ago.  They are being demonized by the MEDIA and you are falling for it.  These aren’t by any means rich people.  They are down to earth people who haven’t been in the Poliical arena forever that are upset about the way our Country is going.  Small Government is not a bad thing, Balancing our budget is not a bad thing, getting rid of the waste, fraud, and abuse is needed badly, can’t you see that we cannot keep spending money that we don’t have.  We are in debt to China and only pay the interest on our debt.  THIS IS WRONG. 

  • Noah

    Just like other government-run services, police, fire, etc., I have deep respect for the working man and women who bring the mail to my door each day.
     
    As an aside, I saw the test.  Even for a part time delivery person, it’s overwhelming. 
     
    Just as the dogs that bark, bite and chase you, ignore some of these disparaging comments.  
     
    Most of the negativism is from the deep seated GOPer-Tea Party anti-worker and anti-union people.  Many of whom have never walked more than a mile in their lives.

  • Noah

    Just like other government-run services, police, fire, etc., I have deep respect for the working man and women who bring the mail to my door each day.
     
    As an aside, I saw the test.  Even for a part time delivery person, it’s overwhelming. 
     
    Just as the dogs that bark, bite and chase you, ignore some of these disparaging comments.  
     
    Most of the negativism is from the deep seated GOPer-Tea Party anti-worker and anti-union people.  Many of whom have never walked more than a mile in their lives.

  • Noah

    End the monopolistic control of oil companies.

  • Noah

    You’ve got to kidding?  “Robbing the rich to pay for the poor.”

  • Noah

    You’ve got to kidding?  “Robbing the rich to pay for the poor.”

  • Noah

    You’ve got to kidding?  “Robbing the rich to pay for the poor.”

  • Noah

    You’ve got to kidding?  “Robbing the rich to pay for the poor.”

  • Noah

    You’ve got to kidding?  “Robbing the rich to pay for the poor.”

  • Noah

    That’s what all of the Tea Party cadre are hoping for.

  • Anonymous

    Post Master General Donahoe should step down as Post Mater, the size of payroll for any  Busniess should only be 35%-45% of there gross income. The unions across this great nation have bled the company’s dry and that is why so many companies have moved overseas. The postal service should take a lesson from FED-X or UPS, they are great companys and they treat there people right. we could get by without the postal service, they should hire a private company to turn them around. What is Donahoe making for a salary? any man at the top of any company should run that company in the black not in the red, if Donahoe was working in the private sector and run that company the same way as the USPS year after year that company would either have to fire him or go under!!!!

  • yowsayowsa1

     Typical liberal reply.

     Real glad these postal workers are well paid without knowing where that money actually comes from.

     The PO is just another government entity being run into the ground because of the simple premise that it is somebody else’s money.

  • Anonymous

    I agree, remember Cliff Clavin from Cheers?

  • Anonymous

    If Cliff Clavin can pass the test , even you could!

  • Anonymous

    If Cliff Clavin can pass the test , even you could!

  • Anonymous

    Newman from Seinfeld didn’t work on bad weather days.

  • Anonymous

    Newman from Seinfeld didn’t work on bad weather days.

  • Anonymous

    I made a bomb shelter from catalogs!

  • Anonymous

    I made a bomb shelter from catalogs!

  • Anonymous

    I made a bomb shelter from catalogs!

  • Anonymous

    I made a bomb shelter from catalogs!

  • Anonymous

    I made a bomb shelter from catalogs!

  • Anonymous

    I tried to get a job at the post office, but Cliff Clavin and Newman  who had lower test scores got my job.  Explanation, my IQ was over 78.

  • Anonymous

    I tried to get a job at the post office, but Cliff Clavin and Newman  who had lower test scores got my job.  Explanation, my IQ was over 78.

  • Anonymous

    I tried to get a job at the post office, but Cliff Clavin and Newman  who had lower test scores got my job.  Explanation, my IQ was over 78.

  • Anonymous

    I tried to get a job at the post office, but Cliff Clavin and Newman  who had lower test scores got my job.  Explanation, my IQ was over 78.

  • Anonymous

    I tried to get a job at the post office, but Cliff Clavin and Newman  who had lower test scores got my job.  Explanation, my IQ was over 78.

  • Anonymous

    I tried to get a job at the post office, but Cliff Clavin and Newman  who had lower test scores got my job.  Explanation, my IQ was over 78.

  • Anonymous

    I tried to get a job at the post office, but Cliff Clavin and Newman  who had lower test scores got my job.  Explanation, my IQ was over 78.

  • Anonymous

    I tried to get a job at the post office, but Cliff Clavin and Newman  who had lower test scores got my job.  Explanation, my IQ was over 78.

  • Anonymous

    I tried to get a job at the post office, but Cliff Clavin and Newman  who had lower test scores got my job.  Explanation, my IQ was over 78.

  • Anonymous

    I tried to get a job at the post office, but Cliff Clavin and Newman  who had lower test scores got my job.  Explanation, my IQ was over 78.

  • Anonymous

    I tried to get a job at the post office, but Cliff Clavin and Newman  who had lower test scores got my job.  Explanation, my IQ was over 78.

  • Anonymous

    I tried to get a job at the post office, but Cliff Clavin and Newman  who had lower test scores got my job.  Explanation, my IQ was over 78.

  • Anonymous

    I tried to get a job at the post office, but Cliff Clavin and Newman  who had lower test scores got my job.  Explanation, my IQ was over 78.

  • Anonymous

    I’m self employed and do not receive overtime  even when i work over 50 hours a week.

  • Anonymous

    I’m self employed and do not receive overtime  even when i work over 50 hours a week.

  • Anonymous

    I’m self employed and do not receive overtime  even when i work over 50 hours a week.

  • Anonymous

    I’m self employed and do not receive overtime  even when i work over 50 hours a week.

  • Anonymous

    I’m self employed and do not receive overtime  even when i work over 50 hours a week.

  • Anonymous

    I’m self employed and do not receive overtime  even when i work over 50 hours a week.

  • Anonymous

    Who works anymore?

  • Anonymous

    (U.S. SENATE) – U.S. Senator Jon Tester is demanding to know why the head of the U.S. Postal Service made $800,000 in total compensation while eliminating local Montana positions as the organization is dealing with a multi-billion-dollar shortfall.    He makes $800,000 plus a year what a joke.

  • Anonymous

    Ok somewhrinmaine, Lets say you are a mail carrier. Now be honest. What are you willing to cut out of your job?

    *all overtime
    *cut your salary in half
    * do away with half of your medical benifits
    *up your medical deductible to $5,000.oo
    *pay for your own uniforms
    *buy your own mace so you can defend youself against wild dogs
    *accept that mgt will continue to get same pay
    *accept you will be fired if you get sick while working in 0 degree winter weather
    *accept that you will use you own vehicle on the job
    *accept you will only be working part time in the future
    *accept now that you are a part timer, you now lose your medical benifits
    *accept if a Canadian applies for your job the Canadian will get it as they don’t need benifits
    *accept that the republicans don’t give a damn about you, your wife, or your children.

    Good luck in the future. Better start looking for a new job. Nobody cares.

  • Anonymous

    Ok somewhrinmaine, Lets say you are a mail carrier. Now be honest. What are you willing to cut out of your job?

    *all overtime
    *cut your salary in half
    * do away with half of your medical benifits
    *up your medical deductible to $5,000.oo
    *pay for your own uniforms
    *buy your own mace so you can defend youself against wild dogs
    *accept that mgt will continue to get same pay
    *accept you will be fired if you get sick while working in 0 degree winter weather
    *accept that you will use you own vehicle on the job
    *accept you will only be working part time in the future
    *accept now that you are a part timer, you now lose your medical benifits
    *accept if a Canadian applies for your job the Canadian will get it as they don’t need benifits
    *accept that the republicans don’t give a damn about you, your wife, or your children.

    Good luck in the future. Better start looking for a new job. Nobody cares.

  • Anonymous

    Thank you you have made my point!

  • Anonymous

    If the rich paid the rate I do I would not mind, but they do not. There are layers upon layers of loopholes and deductions only the rich can take. This has gotten out of control. When I pay a higher effective tax rate than Warren Buffet and I can barely keep gas in my car and own NOTHING, we have a problem. It is in the national best interest to have policies that help middle class people thrive. That is not the direction the GOP and the right wing have taken us. Some european countries have gone too far, granted, but we treat our workers like crap here. Ever increasing productivity and profit are not finding there way to wages. How many more decades do you want workers wages to stagnate? It has been 30 years of stagnation. The wealthy have not had it bad at all. For the wealthy, the recession is something they see on the news and say “those poor people”. They see increase after increase. It has become so imbalanced, people are too overworked to have a life. We are the worst country in the world for maternity leave, we have none. We have no paid vacation. Many get no sick time. I am one of those. I have an advanced degree and travel over 150 miles a day to work. Nothing closer to home and I can’t sell the house I am in because greedy bankers screwed up the housing market. I get no sick pay, no vacation, no severance, no paid holidays, no health benefits. If I get sick i have to be a leech on the system because I cannot afford insurance at over $2500 a month. That would be more than half my take home pay. Meanwhile, the wealthy see double digit increases every year in net worth and profits for corporations. They don’t pass anything on to the workers anymore. This can continue for a while, but soon, we, the working poor and barely middle class will not have it anymore. There will be rebellion. Republicans are all for not only letting this continue but giving even more to the elite. More tax breaks, more deductions, and a piece of buying up the public enterprises that they want to privatize. This is ugly. It is against what america is all about. Opportunity, bah! That was another age. The chances my daughter, bright and industrious, will ever live with any security or piece of mind is slim. Yet, the elite rich will have every opportunity handed to them. They cannot fail when working slobs like me pay higher effective tax rates than they do. Unions keep a balance between labor and corporations. Corporations own congress, unions have less influence than ever. The GOP outlawing unions is akin to the democrats outlawing churches. It kills the organizing base. Workers now have nothing. That is the GOP wet dream. Corporations having complete control over the populous. So we can work for next to nothing and they can enjoy not millions but billions off our sweat. 40% paying no federal income tax is because many are seniors on fixed income, unemployed, under-employed, disabled or just plain poor. Many GOP candidates want to abolish the minimum wage. This wage is not enough to survive on, full time. Thats why so many are on food stamps while working. Higher wages mean less reliance on social programs. Robbing the rich, please! You cannot be that convinced by the corporate media that has Americans hating on the poor, while Wall Street sucks the life out of us. BDN articles about $5 food stamp fraud get thousands of views. Articles about the mortgage crisis and the fraud and abuse that cost us over a trillion dollars get few readers. You are shilling for those who want to reduce people to their own slave laborers. Robbing the rich, please! Have you no shame. The GOP exploits religion and xenophobia to get votes. Do they act on these things in power, no way! It has been enough to permit the robbery of the middle class since Reagan. We are the richest nation in the world if you count dollars. If you count moral decency, we have sunk to the bottom. the America that delegitimizes democratic presidents is disgusting and not worthy of its flag, constitution or power. Your GOP monsters did it to Clinton and now Obama. Impeachment is for high crimes, not indiscretions. Your party has no morals whatsoever. Liberals are really into harmony and expel their own when they cross the line at all. Look at Anthony Weiner vs. David Vitter. Morality, party of christians, small government (biggest deficits). It is a gigantic lie. You are all frauds. Letting the economy languish to get an R in the white house….this is treasonous to me. I may seem like the angry liberal now, but there will be 200 million more of me soon if this assault continues. You think liberals are weak because we have higher standards of decency, but you will see how weak we are. We will elect presidents you will call illegitimate. We will take this country back if we do not get back to a fair playing field. Robbing the rich? I imagine they will make a tasty meal for some poor and hungry soul.

  • Anonymous

    If the rich paid the rate I do I would not mind, but they do not. There are layers upon layers of loopholes and deductions only the rich can take. This has gotten out of control. When I pay a higher effective tax rate than Warren Buffet and I can barely keep gas in my car and own NOTHING, we have a problem. It is in the national best interest to have policies that help middle class people thrive. That is not the direction the GOP and the right wing have taken us. Some european countries have gone too far, granted, but we treat our workers like crap here. Ever increasing productivity and profit are not finding there way to wages. How many more decades do you want workers wages to stagnate? It has been 30 years of stagnation. The wealthy have not had it bad at all. For the wealthy, the recession is something they see on the news and say “those poor people”. They see increase after increase. It has become so imbalanced, people are too overworked to have a life. We are the worst country in the world for maternity leave, we have none. We have no paid vacation. Many get no sick time. I am one of those. I have an advanced degree and travel over 150 miles a day to work. Nothing closer to home and I can’t sell the house I am in because greedy bankers screwed up the housing market. I get no sick pay, no vacation, no severance, no paid holidays, no health benefits. If I get sick i have to be a leech on the system because I cannot afford insurance at over $2500 a month. That would be more than half my take home pay. Meanwhile, the wealthy see double digit increases every year in net worth and profits for corporations. They don’t pass anything on to the workers anymore. This can continue for a while, but soon, we, the working poor and barely middle class will not have it anymore. There will be rebellion. Republicans are all for not only letting this continue but giving even more to the elite. More tax breaks, more deductions, and a piece of buying up the public enterprises that they want to privatize. This is ugly. It is against what america is all about. Opportunity, bah! That was another age. The chances my daughter, bright and industrious, will ever live with any security or piece of mind is slim. Yet, the elite rich will have every opportunity handed to them. They cannot fail when working slobs like me pay higher effective tax rates than they do. Unions keep a balance between labor and corporations. Corporations own congress, unions have less influence than ever. The GOP outlawing unions is akin to the democrats outlawing churches. It kills the organizing base. Workers now have nothing. That is the GOP wet dream. Corporations having complete control over the populous. So we can work for next to nothing and they can enjoy not millions but billions off our sweat. 40% paying no federal income tax is because many are seniors on fixed income, unemployed, under-employed, disabled or just plain poor. Many GOP candidates want to abolish the minimum wage. This wage is not enough to survive on, full time. Thats why so many are on food stamps while working. Higher wages mean less reliance on social programs. Robbing the rich, please! You cannot be that convinced by the corporate media that has Americans hating on the poor, while Wall Street sucks the life out of us. BDN articles about $5 food stamp fraud get thousands of views. Articles about the mortgage crisis and the fraud and abuse that cost us over a trillion dollars get few readers. You are shilling for those who want to reduce people to their own slave laborers. Robbing the rich, please! Have you no shame. The GOP exploits religion and xenophobia to get votes. Do they act on these things in power, no way! It has been enough to permit the robbery of the middle class since Reagan. We are the richest nation in the world if you count dollars. If you count moral decency, we have sunk to the bottom. the America that delegitimizes democratic presidents is disgusting and not worthy of its flag, constitution or power. Your GOP monsters did it to Clinton and now Obama. Impeachment is for high crimes, not indiscretions. Your party has no morals whatsoever. Liberals are really into harmony and expel their own when they cross the line at all. Look at Anthony Weiner vs. David Vitter. Morality, party of christians, small government (biggest deficits). It is a gigantic lie. You are all frauds. Letting the economy languish to get an R in the white house….this is treasonous to me. I may seem like the angry liberal now, but there will be 200 million more of me soon if this assault continues. You think liberals are weak because we have higher standards of decency, but you will see how weak we are. We will elect presidents you will call illegitimate. We will take this country back if we do not get back to a fair playing field. Robbing the rich? I imagine they will make a tasty meal for some poor and hungry soul.

  • Anonymous

    why is the post master general making $800,000+ a year when there are going under? he should be put in jail and have to pay for his own way.

  • Anonymous

    why is the post master general making $800,000+ a year when there are going under? he should be put in jail and have to pay for his own way.

  • Anonymous

    why is the post master general making $800,000+ a year when there are going under? he should be put in jail and have to pay for his own way.

  • Anonymous

    why is the post master general making $800,000+ a year when there are going under? he should be put in jail and have to pay for his own way.

  • Anonymous

    why is the post master general making $800,000+ a year when there are going under? he should be put in jail and have to pay for his own way.

  • Anonymous

    Enough layoffs and the system WILL crash.  Businesses and manufacturers depend on people having money to buy their goods and services. Once no one but you in your neighborhood is still employed, how long will your own job last?

    As for the people who don’t pay taxes because their income is extremely low–are you sure you want to emphasize that the Tea Party likes to cut taxes on  millionaires and make people earning $20,000 per year pay taxes?

  • Anonymous

    The Tea Party thinks laying people off = creating jobs. Double-think is second nature to them.

  • Anonymous

    Don’t be too quick to hold up Texas as a model for Maine…

    Governor Rick Perry hasn’t been shy in reporting that, despite the ongoing economic crisis, Texas continues to create more new jobs than any other state in the nation. It’s a “Texas Miracle” as Perry calls it. Perry attributes this job growth to his successful implementation of conservative principles such as low taxes and minimal government regulation. However, as Harold Meyerson points out, Perry neglects to mention the quality of the jobs created in Texas. According to the Bureau of Labor Statistics, Texas ties with Mississippi for the highest percentage of workers in minimum wage jobs.
    Although low-wage jobs may bring more businesses to Texas (greater access to cheap labor will often do that), this type of job creation does little to break the cycle of poverty. It comes as no surprise that Texas ranks 4th highest in the percentage of individuals living below the federal poverty line. That’s some “miracle.” [http://friendsofjustice.wordpress.com/2011/08/18/rick-perrys-texas-miracle-or-not/]

    Virtually all of those new jobs are in the government sector, not in private enterprise. [http://www.usnews.com/news/blogs/rick-newman/2011/08/16/how-rick-perry-created-jobs-in-texas]. There are Federal gov’t jobs (Army bases & NASA) and state gov’t jobs (Texas: Up 8.4 percent. U.S.: Down 0.1 percent). Texas also accepted $6.4 billion in stimulus money from Washington. Of course Perry is very, very, very much against stimulus money… unless it’s coming HIS way.

  • Anonymous

    Don’t be too quick to hold up Texas as a model for Maine…

    Governor Rick Perry hasn’t been shy in reporting that, despite the ongoing economic crisis, Texas continues to create more new jobs than any other state in the nation. It’s a “Texas Miracle” as Perry calls it. Perry attributes this job growth to his successful implementation of conservative principles such as low taxes and minimal government regulation. However, as Harold Meyerson points out, Perry neglects to mention the quality of the jobs created in Texas. According to the Bureau of Labor Statistics, Texas ties with Mississippi for the highest percentage of workers in minimum wage jobs.
    Although low-wage jobs may bring more businesses to Texas (greater access to cheap labor will often do that), this type of job creation does little to break the cycle of poverty. It comes as no surprise that Texas ranks 4th highest in the percentage of individuals living below the federal poverty line. That’s some “miracle.” [http://friendsofjustice.wordpress.com/2011/08/18/rick-perrys-texas-miracle-or-not/]

    Virtually all of those new jobs are in the government sector, not in private enterprise. [http://www.usnews.com/news/blogs/rick-newman/2011/08/16/how-rick-perry-created-jobs-in-texas]. There are Federal gov’t jobs (Army bases & NASA) and state gov’t jobs (Texas: Up 8.4 percent. U.S.: Down 0.1 percent). Texas also accepted $6.4 billion in stimulus money from Washington. Of course Perry is very, very, very much against stimulus money… unless it’s coming HIS way.

  • Anonymous

    Don’t be too quick to hold up Texas as a model for Maine…

    Governor Rick Perry hasn’t been shy in reporting that, despite the ongoing economic crisis, Texas continues to create more new jobs than any other state in the nation. It’s a “Texas Miracle” as Perry calls it. Perry attributes this job growth to his successful implementation of conservative principles such as low taxes and minimal government regulation. However, as Harold Meyerson points out, Perry neglects to mention the quality of the jobs created in Texas. According to the Bureau of Labor Statistics, Texas ties with Mississippi for the highest percentage of workers in minimum wage jobs.
    Although low-wage jobs may bring more businesses to Texas (greater access to cheap labor will often do that), this type of job creation does little to break the cycle of poverty. It comes as no surprise that Texas ranks 4th highest in the percentage of individuals living below the federal poverty line. That’s some “miracle.” [http://friendsofjustice.wordpress.com/2011/08/18/rick-perrys-texas-miracle-or-not/]

    Virtually all of those new jobs are in the government sector, not in private enterprise. [http://www.usnews.com/news/blogs/rick-newman/2011/08/16/how-rick-perry-created-jobs-in-texas]. There are Federal gov’t jobs (Army bases & NASA) and state gov’t jobs (Texas: Up 8.4 percent. U.S.: Down 0.1 percent). Texas also accepted $6.4 billion in stimulus money from Washington. Of course Perry is very, very, very much against stimulus money… unless it’s coming HIS way.

  • Anonymous

    I hope one day ALL workers will realize that Republicans hate workers. And I hope it happens before we’re saddled with even more Republicans elected to important positions. They aim to destroy America… at least the America most people live in (as vs. the Koch brothers, who bankroll the TP).

  • Anonymous

    You need to stop being a productive part of the economy and get a job at the Post Office… if it still exists in awhile.

  • Anonymous

    Am I the only one that loved the Newman character on the Seinfeld Show?  So well played and so realistic.

  • Anonymous

    Am I the only one that loved the Newman character on the Seinfeld Show?  So well played and so realistic.

  • Anonymous

    And I live in a town of less than 5,000 in central maine.  We have one town office that serves our town and three tiny towns surrounding it, yet there are 4 post offices.  What gives??  If any private company conducted their business that ineffeciently, I would hope they would fold.  That’s just bad business.

  • Anonymous

    And I live in a town of less than 5,000 in central maine.  We have one town office that serves our town and three tiny towns surrounding it, yet there are 4 post offices.  What gives??  If any private company conducted their business that ineffeciently, I would hope they would fold.  That’s just bad business.

  • Anonymous

    Raise the bulk mail rates, over half of what is delivered is being delivered for a ridiculously low rate.  That ends up as a subsidy for the businesses (profit and non-profit) that take advantage of sending out the 100,000,000,000 pieces of junk mail each year (that’s the U.S. alone).  The more you mail, the cheaper it gets.

  • weezy

    sorry, your facts do not apply to Maine carriers…salaries for carriers  never top $55k, even after 25 years, consisting of many years of diligent on time work, having your deliveries measured, your route timed, your sick days monitored, and being a long term employed taxpayer, which is almost unheard of now in Maine.  You must memorize all city streets and know which of the 44 local routes that all 600 streets plus businesses are on…requiring months of training.  And since many move numerous times a year, you must know who has moved out and who has moved in daily.

  • Moose

    You know it true but whatever.Play dumb if it makes you feel better..

  • Anonymous

    What are you talking about. USPS is a financially independent organization.  The monies don’t co-mingle with federal dollars. It isn’t like social security which both parties rob daily. The fact is the post office is a bloated partially archaic organization and is paying the price.  The government did force them to be more responsible and pay into there own pension fund. Do you want it to run short? Good thing they did. Look where they are now. At least they can care for some of their retirees.

  • Anonymous

    What are you talking about. USPS is a financially independent organization.  The monies don’t co-mingle with federal dollars. It isn’t like social security which both parties rob daily. The fact is the post office is a bloated partially archaic organization and is paying the price.  The government did force them to be more responsible and pay into there own pension fund. Do you want it to run short? Good thing they did. Look where they are now. At least they can care for some of their retirees.

  • Anonymous

    What are you talking about. USPS is a financially independent organization.  The monies don’t co-mingle with federal dollars. It isn’t like social security which both parties rob daily. The fact is the post office is a bloated partially archaic organization and is paying the price.  The government did force them to be more responsible and pay into there own pension fund. Do you want it to run short? Good thing they did. Look where they are now. At least they can care for some of their retirees.

  • Anonymous

    What are you talking about. USPS is a financially independent organization.  The monies don’t co-mingle with federal dollars. It isn’t like social security which both parties rob daily. The fact is the post office is a bloated partially archaic organization and is paying the price.  The government did force them to be more responsible and pay into there own pension fund. Do you want it to run short? Good thing they did. Look where they are now. At least they can care for some of their retirees.

  • Anonymous

    What are you talking about. USPS is a financially independent organization.  The monies don’t co-mingle with federal dollars. It isn’t like social security which both parties rob daily. The fact is the post office is a bloated partially archaic organization and is paying the price.  The government did force them to be more responsible and pay into there own pension fund. Do you want it to run short? Good thing they did. Look where they are now. At least they can care for some of their retirees.

  • Anonymous

    What are you talking about. USPS is a financially independent organization.  The monies don’t co-mingle with federal dollars. It isn’t like social security which both parties rob daily. The fact is the post office is a bloated partially archaic organization and is paying the price.  The government did force them to be more responsible and pay into there own pension fund. Do you want it to run short? Good thing they did. Look where they are now. At least they can care for some of their retirees.

  • Anonymous

    Lithium. I recommend lithium.

  • http://www.facebook.com/people/Jason-Scott/1379715869 Jason Scott

    I’m honestly not trying to put down USPS workers, but I do have to question certain practices:
    1) it’s never a good idea to cut customer benefits when they already have plenty of other options. Cutting Saturdays, in particular, is only going to drive more folks to UPS, FedEx, etc. more often … and they won’t come back as much.
    2) In my town, we have one local post office … it’s less than one mile from a larger post office in the next town. Our post office has hours that even a banker would envy: opens at 8:30, closes at 5 … and it’s only open about 2 hours on Saturday. I had a PO box there for a couple years and could only get my mail on Saturday, because MY job starts before 8 and ends after 5 — I could never get there.
    3) At Christmas time, I went to the local Post Office to get my mail and send some gifts. It was 9:30. The post office was scheduled to open at 10. On a Saturday. During their busiest season of the year. Except they hung up a sign saying they wouldn’t be open until 11. And they were still going to close at noon. Ummm … customer service? I think not. There were 50 customers in the lobby who shared the poor customer service sentiment.

    From my perspective as a customer, the USPS tends to show that it doesn’t want my business — it makes it very difficult for me to use them. (Yes, I realize I can slap a stamp on an envelope and drop it in my mailbox and it’ll get picked up … but I seldom need that particular benefit. I’ve mailed one reply card from home that way in the last 2 years.)

    They need to focus on customer needs and find efficient, economical ways to fill them. Cutting services will only hasten their demise.

  • http://www.facebook.com/people/Jason-Scott/1379715869 Jason Scott

    I’m honestly not trying to put down USPS workers, but I do have to question certain practices:
    1) it’s never a good idea to cut customer benefits when they already have plenty of other options. Cutting Saturdays, in particular, is only going to drive more folks to UPS, FedEx, etc. more often … and they won’t come back as much.
    2) In my town, we have one local post office … it’s less than one mile from a larger post office in the next town. Our post office has hours that even a banker would envy: opens at 8:30, closes at 5 … and it’s only open about 2 hours on Saturday. I had a PO box there for a couple years and could only get my mail on Saturday, because MY job starts before 8 and ends after 5 — I could never get there.
    3) At Christmas time, I went to the local Post Office to get my mail and send some gifts. It was 9:30. The post office was scheduled to open at 10. On a Saturday. During their busiest season of the year. Except they hung up a sign saying they wouldn’t be open until 11. And they were still going to close at noon. Ummm … customer service? I think not. There were 50 customers in the lobby who shared the poor customer service sentiment.

    From my perspective as a customer, the USPS tends to show that it doesn’t want my business — it makes it very difficult for me to use them. (Yes, I realize I can slap a stamp on an envelope and drop it in my mailbox and it’ll get picked up … but I seldom need that particular benefit. I’ve mailed one reply card from home that way in the last 2 years.)

    They need to focus on customer needs and find efficient, economical ways to fill them. Cutting services will only hasten their demise.

  • Anonymous

    For once I have to tell the Bangor Daily News  I want to appreciate them  for running that photo of Susan Collins.
     It brought me back to my love of the Japanese Print era called Ukiyo-e.
    I kudddya sworn Collins reminded me of a kabuki actress depicting a Japanese courtesan
    in a 18th century Utamaro print.

  • Anonymous

    I don’t normally reply but here goes.  Spent 24 years in the USAF so i know all about heat and cold.  did not get paid for overtime.  Spent a lot of my holidays away from home missed a lot of my childrens events.  Paid for my own uniforms much to most peoples beleaf otherwise.  If i remember when i grew up the mail man did not have a truck and he walked his entire route after bing dropped off.  there was no mace back then he got along with the dogs.  Now consider this those that are employed but the post office ought to be thankful that they have a job that has all the benifits.  Think of those that have lost their jobs becuase of a bad economy.  I think anyone reading this knows where it is going so i will close now.  Have a nice day.  :)

  • Anonymous

    Again..union problem. From last months APWU ( American Postal Workers Union) newsletter”… the APWU will fight tooth and nail to stop any reduction in delivery days or reductions in personnel…”   

  • Anonymous

    UPS doesn’t work weekends.

  • Anonymous

    FEDEX drivers aren’t even considered employees of FEDEX.Think no benefits.

  • Anonymous

    Attack workers and privatize everything and then charge even more for services and pay less for workers. If you can’t move it to China, privatize it.

  • Anonymous

    Former military service people make up a lot of the postal service.
    Do you really want to hurt them more?

  • Anonymous

    Do you understand the difference between tv comedy and real life?

  • Anonymous

    The Postal Service hasn’t used any taxpayer
    funding for more than twenty-five years. It pays for it’s operations
    through the sale of it’s services and products. In the past four years,
    operational revenues at the USPS have exceeded costs by $611 million. Customer
    satisfaction and delivery of the mail on time are at record highs.
    The problem lies elsewhere: the 2006 congressional mandate that the USPS
    pre-fund future retiree health benefits for the next 75 years, and do so within
    a decade, an obligation no other public agency or private firm faces. The
    roughly $5.5 billion annual payments since 2007 — $21 billion total — are the
    difference between a positive and negative ledger.
    If the health care mandate were to be amended, the USPS would be in good financial shape.

  • Anonymous

    Not true. UPS delivers on Saturday but it costs extra. Since UPS provides a decent service I don’t hold it against them. UPS provides a far better service in my opinion. 

  • Anonymous

    Until you have had the experience you can’t really have any clue exactly what we do as postal employees. But you know what they say about opinions everyone has got one and the majority are ignorant. Until you have done any part of what we do whether it’s carry mail, deliver mail, sort mail, and the many many jobs out there, keep your ignorance to yourself. Thank you

  • Anonymous

    Until you have had the experience you can’t really have any clue exactly what we do as postal employees. But you know what they say about opinions everyone has got one and the majority are ignorant. Until you have done any part of what we do whether it’s carry mail, deliver mail, sort mail, and the many many jobs out there, keep your ignorance to yourself. Thank you

  • Anonymous

    I see no reason why workers can’t voluntarily work on weekends if they want to. Especially a worker owned unionized shop.

  • Anonymous

    I’m confused. 

    You said: UPS doesn’t work weekends.

    I said: “Not true” since they will deliver on Saturday. 

    You said: I see no reason why workers can’t voluntarily work on weekends if they want to.

    So are we agreeing that UPS works on Saturdays?

  • Anonymous

    I’m confused. 

    You said: UPS doesn’t work weekends.

    I said: “Not true” since they will deliver on Saturday. 

    You said: I see no reason why workers can’t voluntarily work on weekends if they want to.

    So are we agreeing that UPS works on Saturdays?

  • Anonymous

    Getting rid of human rights is wrong. Screwing people out of their retirements is wrong. Intimidating elected officials is wrong. Organizing millions of people against These United States is not only wrong, it’s illegal, seditious, and an act of war. Just sayin’ since you brought it up. And hasn’t Hoffa been dead for decades. How is he saying anything, nevermind anything to upset you and your co-conspirators?

  • Anonymous

    I’m saying I’ve never seen a UPS truck on the weekend, but if they want to work and it is offered, why not, with overtime.
    As part of their work schedule, weekends are not required.

  • Guest

    Apparently it’s not OK to disagree with glmmsm and his ilk…

  • Guest

    It’s evident you don’t know anything about the Tea Party! They most probably orchestrated and funded 9-11. The police and firemen who got tricked into responding and going to their deaths, fast or slow, were all unionized public employees. Thee airline employees were mostly union people. The Airtraffic controllers that Reagan screwed out of their rights, jobs, and pensions were unionized public employees. When those facts are presented to Tea Partyers they laugh and go “Boo Hoo! They were way overpaid and knew the risks when they took those jobs. They sat around eating donuts and goofing off with health insurance and human rights while the rest of us worked out butts off. Booh Hhooo!” You’d have to be deaf dumb and blind not to see it. To these baggers I say, your days are numbered, and bite me.

  • Guest

    There is no financial emergency. It isn’t like, Oh No! Someone burned half of our dollar bills and now there’s no money. Think about money like blood flowing through your veins. It doesn’t matter how much you’ve got if it’s not getting to the places it’s needed and/or if it’s not flowing fast enough. Money, to be properly understood, should be described the same way miles per hour are. I hope that helps. It would have made way more sense for the FED to print the money. Borrowing it from China was stupid and the result of electing stupid people to office, by which I mean people who don’t know what the FED is and does and don’t understand Macro Economics.

  • Anonymous

    A comment I can’t seem to find asked what “double-think” is. The word was coined by George Orwell in the novel Nineteen Eighty-Four. It describes the act of simultaneously accepting two mutually contradictory beliefs as correct.

  • Anonymous

      Why are we “borrowing” money from China???  And why are we ONLY paying the INTEREST on our debt??  Would you really run your household that way?  And would you then look your friends in the face and tell them you had “no financial emergency”? 

  • Anonymous

      Why are we “borrowing” money from China???  And why are we ONLY paying the INTEREST on our debt??  Would you really run your household that way?  And would you then look your friends in the face and tell them you had “no financial emergency”? 

  • Anonymous

      Why are we “borrowing” money from China???  And why are we ONLY paying the INTEREST on our debt??  Would you really run your household that way?  And would you then look your friends in the face and tell them you had “no financial emergency”? 

  • Anonymous

      Why are we “borrowing” money from China???  And why are we ONLY paying the INTEREST on our debt??  Would you really run your household that way?  And would you then look your friends in the face and tell them you had “no financial emergency”? 

  • Anonymous

      Why are we “borrowing” money from China???  And why are we ONLY paying the INTEREST on our debt??  Would you really run your household that way?  And would you then look your friends in the face and tell them you had “no financial emergency”? 

  • Anonymous

      Why are we “borrowing” money from China???  And why are we ONLY paying the INTEREST on our debt??  Would you really run your household that way?  And would you then look your friends in the face and tell them you had “no financial emergency”? 

  • Anonymous

    In 2006 the congress passed a “poison pill” law that forced the USPS to pay for the next 75 years of expected benefits in 10 years. This was in addition to USPS overpaying on their pension liabilities by more than $50 billion. Right now, the US government is holding onto over $60 Billion in postal service funds above and beyond what they need for their pension system. Why was this done? Well UPS happened to give the sponsors of the law a very handsome campaign contribution. They poisoned the USPS. Now there is a bill that seeks to return the over-payments back. This will get blocked by the GOP who want to bust the postal service and privatize with UPS. That’s why the postal service is in trouble. Look up any of the facts I presented here. They are all on the congressional record from the postmasters testimony on the Hill earlier in the week.

ADVERTISEMENT | Grow your business

Marketplace Coupons

ADVERTISEMENT | Grow your business