April 20, 2019
Bangor Latest News | Bangor Homelessness | Bangor Metro | Local Spirits | Today's Paper

Event or assembly, city says Occupy Bangor must work with it

John Clarke Russ | BDN
John Clarke Russ | BDN
Jim Frye of Bangor closes the tie-back door on a tent that was erected Sunday, Nov. 20, 2011, and that he and others slept in overnight. He said he and other Occupy Bangor participants held a gathering at Peirce Park into the early hours of Monday morning.

BANGOR, Maine — While still working to file a temporary restraining order request against the city, Occupy Bangor members attended a public workshop with city councilors and staff members Tuesday night.

The workshop was called to clarify ordinances and legal language and offer a forum for both city officials and Occupy members to speak.

“I asked for this meeting so we’re all on the same page,” said Councilor Joe Baldacci, who later questioned the need to require a city event permit for demonstrators. “My concern is we were just floating along … and this situation kind of evolved and developed.”

Eight of the nine councilors were present, as was Bangor City Solicitor Norm Heitmann, City Manager Cathy Conlow, Parks and Recreation Department Director Tracy Willette and Police Chief Ron Gastia. About 18 Occupy members attended as well.

Conlow opened things up by talking about the concerns city staff members have with the Occupy encampment’s permanent structures, overnight camping and failure to apply for a permit for their occupation of Peirce Park, which began Oct. 29.

Heitmann then explained what constitutes a park, of which Bangor has 34, and what ordinances and policies they are governed by. He also repeated an important point about Occupy Bangor’s contention that they are holding an assembly, not an event.

“We’re getting too caught up in making a distinction between an event and an assembly, but that really has little bearing on things,” he said. “And as far as First Amendment assembly issues, you do not have greater or lesser First Amendment rights if you are part of a group. The First Amendment is the First Amendment. It stands for everyone whether they’re part of a group, a pair or a single person.”

The situation in Bangor mirrors that in Portland, where OccupyMaine members are in talks with city officials over safety and health concerns at the movement’s 24-hour-a-day camp at Lincoln Park.

“We had a meeting yesterday with city officials and they gave us a list of safety violations and concerns they had,” said OccupyMaine spokeswoman Katherine Hulit of Falmouth. “They didn’t say we had to leave, but they did have some things they wanted us to address.”

Hulit, a full-time student as a double major in gender studies and philosophy at the University of Southern Maine, was attending a rally at McPherson Square in Washington, D.C., Tuesday night, but planned to be back in Portland on Saturday.

“We’re kind of letting our members take the time to digest food and information over the holiday,” said Hulit, who says the group has 30 to 50 people camping overnight at the park. “The city of Portland has been very cooperative with us and we want to extend that same cooperation.”

OccupyMaine has been at either Monument Square or Lincoln Park since Oct. 1.

In Bangor, Councilor Charlie Longo compared Occupy movement members, who believe the nation’s financial resources and democratic processes no longer belong to the majority of citizens, to the Pilgrims who came to America to escape persecution.

Law student Logan Perkins of Eddington, who works in Bangor, was the first to take the podium for the public comment section of the workshop.

“We in no way meet the definition of a public event and I won’t stipulate that Occupy Bangor meets the complete definition of a public assembly either, but our activity is protected speech,” said Perkins, who was helping to work on the temporary restraining order.

“The basic legal position [behind the protection order] is the parks ordinance and the events ordinance are unconstitutional as applied to Occupy Bangor” because of the First Amendment, she said.

After elaborating on parts of Bangor’s ordinances that she thinks allow Occupy to continue to operate 24 hours a day at Peirce Park, Perkins offered a four-part proposal to the council:

• Occupy would retain 24/7 access to a portion of the park between the Bangor Public Library’s property line up to the left edge of the Peirce statue.

• Allow Occupy to remain in the park during open hours (6 a.m. to 10 p.m.) without having to fill out a permit.

• Allow the group to maintain a portable toilet, which they would pay for, and a fire pit, which would be removed daily at 10 p.m.

• Allow them to maintain a finite number of political/educational signs on site.

In all, nine citizens spoke before councilors offered their thoughts.

Councilor Ben Sprague commended the speakers for their passion and said he’d like a better explanation for how long Occupy members plan to stay at the park. Councilor Geoffrey Gratwick said that while he sympathizes with Occupy’s ideals, he thinks councilors should uphold the law governing Bangor’s parks.

“The rules we have are the rules we have to abide by,” said Councilor Jerry Durgin.

“I agree with what you’re saying,” Councilor Pat Blanchette said. “We’ll look at our ordinances and work with you.”

Councilor Sue Hawes agreed, saying she’d like to move quickly and look at the permits process as well as the group’s four-part proposal.

Mayor Cary Weston pledged to schedule another public meeting within a week or two and provide plenty of notice.

Last week, Willette requested that Occupy Bangor members get an event permit by Friday and remove several makeshift structures at the site by the time the park closed Sunday night.

Two of the large canopies were torn down by members over the weekend, but another one was erected in protest of the city’s request.

Have feedback? Want to know more? Send us ideas for follow-up stories.

You may also like