April 23, 2018
Opinion Latest News | Poll Questions | Waffle House Hero | Royal Baby | Stoned Pets

Fight for ease of voting


In the latest battle in the war over voting rights, the Justice Department announced last Thursday its plans to sue Texas over its strict voter identification law, a decision that comes just weeks after Attorney General Eric H. Holder Jr. also promised to challenge the state’s redistricting plan.

States such as Texas with particular histories of racial discrimination at the polls had been required to “preclear” proposed changes to voting practices. Federal courts had blocked both of these laws under that preclearance regime last summer, citing the disproportionate effect they would likely have on poor and minority voters. Then the Supreme Court in June invalidated the Voting Rights Act’s Section 5, and Texas wasted no time in charging ahead with both.

As devastating as the court’s ruling was for the federal government’s ability to protect the franchise, significant portions of the Voting Rights Act still stand. Holder plans to challenge both of Texas’ proposed laws — and, presumably, others like them that have recently passed in other states — in a circuitous route through the portions of the Act that remain.

It’s good to see the Justice Department so emphatically opposes laws that would check minority rights. Unfortunately, fighting them is far easier said than done. Without the preclearance requirement, the Justice Department will have to rely on the Voting Rights Act’s Section 2, which prohibits measures “adopted with the purpose, and will have the result, of denying or abridging the right to vote on account of race, color or membership in a language minority group.”

Section 2, often used to dispute redistricting proposals, may not work against photo identification laws.

Ultimately, the ideal solution to this problem is for Congress to update the act. That way, the Justice Department wouldn’t have to fight laws such as the one in Texas with piecemeal measures on a case-by-case basis.

As we celebrate the achievements of the civil rights movement, we shouldn’t have to mourn the death of one its most significant and necessary achievements.

The Washington Post (Aug. 25)

Have feedback? Want to know more? Send us ideas for follow-up stories.

You may also like