President Barack Obama’s poll numbers are sliding. Around Christmastime, his average approval rating, according to RealClearPolitics, was nearly 54 percent, 12 points higher than his average disapproval rating of 42 percent. Now his numbers have flipped. His average approval rating at 46.6 percent is roughly 2 points lower than his disapproval rating at 48.3 percent. If these numbers hold, P Obama is never going to get re-elected.
Obviously, Obama is not up for re-election, which raises the question: How important are approval ratings for his second term? House Republicans aren’t suddenly going to stop listening to him if his numbers decline. They’re already ignoring him and not embracing his agenda. In the elections of 2014, vulnerable Senate Democrats are competing in states where the president’s approval rating has stunk for a long time. It won’t be affected by a national drop; it can’t go much lower. In this constricted climate, Obama’s falling approval ratings may be less important than for past presidents, except in one key area: implementing health care reform. It is the president’s signature legislative achievement, but he needs to convince the public to sign up. To do that, he still needs them to trust him.
The traditional view of the approval rating is that it gives us a fix on the status of the president’s power to persuade other lawmakers on a given day. If the president’s approval rating is high, politicians will be more easily convinced. They won’t want to upset voters who are apt to listen to the president or who are rooting for him. Or, as in high school, they’ll simply want to associate themselves with the ideas of the popular guy. Approval rating is the power setting on the bully pulpit.
For this reason, on many issues, even if the president’s approval rating were 5 points higher, it wouldn’t matter. Partisanship has made any presidential connection toxic. When the president associates himself with an issue, it is more likely to turn Republicans against it and therefore decrease its chances of passing. We’re seeing this with immigration reform, where Obama has purposefully stayed in the background during Congressional negotiations at the advice of Republicans who say if he campaigns for the measure, he will make it harder for them to pass the bill. (Immigration reform will pass only if Republicans believe that it is in their self-interest, which has little to do with Obama’s popularity.)
As a political matter, the president’s approval rating should matter for Democrats up for re-election in 2014. If Obama is unpopular, the thinking goes, he will drag House and Senate Democrats down. We saw this with President Bush in 2006, where Democrats picked up five seats in the Senate and 30 seats in the House. As John Sides points out, the share of seats controlled by the president’s party depends in part on presidential approval.
But Democrats are already facing a grim landscape next year. The nine most vulnerable seats are either held by a Democrat or are open seats where a Democrat is retiring. In states like Montana, Arkansas, Alaska, Louisiana, West Virginia, and North Carolina, the president’s approval ratings are already so low that the decline in his national standing isn’t going to change things much. In some key Midwestern contests like Iowa, Michigan, and Minnesota, however, the president’s weakness could matter.
In the House, there are nine toss-up races, according to the Cook Political Report. Eight of them are Democratic seats; life for these candidates will get harder as Obama becomes more of an albatross. The one Republican in a toss-up district gets to breathe easier because his opponent is busy trying to enliven discouraged Democrats and define himself as distinct from Obama. The GOP candidate’s strategy gets easier, too, the more trouble the president gets in. He simply ties his opponent to the man at the top. This phenomenon also holds for those seats in the next category of competition—the 11 seats that are leaning toward the Democrat and the 10 leaning toward the Republican.
According to members of the Bush and Clinton years, low approval ratings act like gravel on the road, making everything bumpier. “Members of Congress use approval ratings when determining if they should or should not support the president’s agenda,” says Dan Bartlett, former counselor to George W. Bush. “The lower the number, the more political freedom they believe they have.” Mark Penn, who was Bill Clinton’s pollster and top strategist during his re-election and second term makes a similar point about the “Rule of 50.” “The Rule of 50 is the minute [your approval rating] falls below 50, everybody piles on you and before you know it you’re at 38, 35, because it becomes to the political advantage for everyone to whack you,” he said recently. “And the minute you’re above 50, everybody has to think twice about whacking you, and so you can actually build capital up.”
Matthew Dowd, George W. Bush’s former pollster, says Obama is facing the kind of permanent break that Bush faced in his second term. It’s not just that Obama’s approval ratings are down that’s a problem, says Dowd, the important point is that people see him as less honest and trustworthy than they once did after the spate of recent controversies. “Once you lose ‘honest and trustworthy’ and credibility, which is also what happened to George Bush, people start to say, ‘I don’t trust this guy on anything.’ Once your gut connection on values cracks, there’s no getting it back. … My guess is that wherever Obama’s number settles, barring some big external event, it won’t get above that.”
Preliminary evidence suggests that people are no longer giving the president the benefit of the doubt. In a CNN poll last month, only 37 percent of the public thought that the IRS controversy led to the White House, now 47 percent think it does. If people had more faith in the president’s honesty, perhaps they would instinctively assume he’s blameless, thinking he could never do such a thing.
Health care may be the issue where the president’s slide in the polls matters the most. The Affordable Care Act is the president’s signature legislative achievement and its implementation is the president’s No. 1 priority for his second term, according to aides. The administration and the president’s political arm, Organizing for America, are engaged in a monthslong effort to encourage voters to sign up for the program. Senior Democratic senators have encouraged the White House to use the president more in this effort. If his standing with the public is diminished, it will make that hard sell harder. If younger voters don’t sign up, costs might balloon as only the chronically ill join the program.
It has become a feature of the modern presidency that every second-term president has to defend against a crisis born in their first term. This hampers his ability to achieve new things. For President Obama, the risk of low approval ratings is that they may diminish his ability to protect what he has already achieved.
John Dickerson is a writer for Slate.