OTHER VOICES

Presidential pay-to-play

Posted March 13, 2013, at 3:28 p.m.

President Barack Obama’s money men have taken a welcome step away from the ethical abyss: They will now disclose the names of those who donate $250 or more to the new advocacy group Organizing for Action, which is intended to advance the president’s second-term agenda. Jim Messina, the group’s national chairman, promises to post the donors’ names and the precise amount of their donation quarterly on the group’s website.

This transparency is critical to avoid the corrupting influence of hidden contributions. If someone wants to put $1 million or more on the table as a way of seeking influence with the president, at least it will now be visible.

The new tax-exempt organization is being formed under Section 501(c)(4) of the Internal Revenue Code, a broad category for tax-exempt “social welfare” groups. Federal rules do not require public disclosure of donors and amounts to such groups, as would be required if they were operating under the rules of the Federal Election Commission.

But the fact remains that Organizing for Action still presents an opportunity for abuse. Obama is no longer a candidate but a sitting president. To encourage individuals to make unlimited contributions to a group closely associated with him is unseemly.

Messina declared, “[W]e can’t and we won’t guarantee access to any government officials,” but then he went on to describe “updates” and “briefings” that Obama and the administration will deliver “on the legislative process,” to which the donors and volunteers will be invited. “These are not opportunities to lobby,” he said.

Nice thought, but will it deter a big donor determined to speak to the president?

Messina has portrayed the new group as a grass-roots counterweight to the “special interests” and an attempt to “rebalance the power structure” away from the “highest paid lobbyists on K Street.” But by soliciting unlimited contributions from individuals, and giving them access to the White House, Obama undermines the claim that he is above the special interests and comes across as just another hawker in the unlimited-money sweepstakes.

The Washington Post (March 11)

SEE COMMENTS →

ADVERTISEMENT | Grow your business
ADVERTISEMENT | Grow your business

Similar Articles

More in Opinion