October 19, 2017
Court News Latest News | Poll Questions | Haunted Maine | Obamacare | National Anthem Protests

Comments for: Attorney for defendant in Kennebunk prostitution case says evidence against his client just ‘innuendo and hearsay’

ALFRED, Maine — The case against Mark Strong Sr., charged in connection with the Kennebunk prostitution investigation, is based on “innuendo and hearsay,” not real evidence, Strong’s attorney Daniel Lilley said in court Wednesday as he argued to have the case dismissed. Lilley, representing Strong, 57,… Read More
Guidelines for posting on bangordailynews.com

The Bangor Daily News and the Bangor Publishing Co. encourage comments about stories, but you must follow our terms of service.

  1. Keep it civil and stay on topic
  2. No vulgarity, racial slurs, name-calling or personal attacks.
  3. People who harass others or joke about tragedies will be blocked.
The primary rule here is pretty simple: Treat others with the same respect you'd want for yourself. Here are some guidelines (see more):

  • Anonymous

    I saw a video of the Zumba instructor in action.
    She doesnt look guilty to me.
    Turn her loose already.

  • Anonymous

    You went to hooker, you got caught. Face the music, that’s what you get when you do sleazy things. . Innuendo and hearsay, ;yeah right, lawyer talk for i am doing my best to get you out of your crime.

  • Anonymous

    looks like some of the mud may stick to the Kennebunk Police Dept before this is over

    • Dan Troop

      The only mud I have seen thus far is what Strong’s attorney is throwing around and so far I don’t see that sticking anywhere.

      • The Great White Hope

        Watch some of the zumba videos there is plenty of mud in those!

        • Anonymous

          Was there actual mud? I must have missed some of it, I’ll check again.

          • The Great White Hope

            There is some mud on the dildos.

          • Anonymous

            Oh nice, I’ll pay closer attention in future. Thanks.

  • JohnR

    ………”is based on “innuendo and hearsay,” not real evidence, Strong’s attorney Daniel Lilley said” then should have added…… Oh yeah and lots and lots of video but not real evidence. LOL!

  • Anonymous

    “Lilley says his client began the investigation at the request of Wright,
    who said she was being harassed by the department. During the
    investigation, Lilley says Strong learned of the officer-involved
    shooting of Katherine Paulson and a romantic relationship between Audra
    Presby, the department’s lead investigator in the case, and her
    superior.”

    You say “harrassment”, I say “investigate”. You say “learned of”, I say- both of those cases were all over the news and you can’t make us believe you (Mr Strong) were the first person to “discover” this.

    Mr Lilley- call the whole thing off. The only person spreading gossip here is the lawyer for the defendant.

  • Yawningattrolls

    This is such a comedy – everybody “Zumba”!

  • Anonymous

    Give these people a fine or something and move on. I am so sickened by money wasted on this trial. Why can’t the state spend the money of getting through the huge backlog of child porn creeps in Maine.

You may also like